Education, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 29-45, 2009, Art. no. Electronic.[2] S. M. Reich and J. Reich, "Cultural Competence in Interdisciplinary Collaborations: A Method for Respecting Diversity in Research Partnerships," American Journal of Community Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 51-62, 2006, Art. no. Electronic.[3] A. Kakar, "Teaching analogies and metaphors to enhance communication in interdisciplinary and cross-functional groups," M. S. Electronic thesis, Grado Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 2008.[4] S. Kim, L. D. McNair, and M. C. Paretti, "Self-Organizing Units in an Interdisciplinary Course for Pervasive Computing Design," in American
the MIDFIELD database,” Esource Coll. Transit. Newsl. Natl. Resour. Cent. First-Year Exp. Stud. Transit., vol. 7, no. 4, p. 4, Mar. 2010.[6] D. R. Krathwohl, “A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview,” Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 212–218, 2002.[7] B.S. Everitt, S. Landau, M. Leese, D. Stahl. Cluster Analysis, 5th Ed. Wiley & Sons, 2011.
OF STUDENTS = 32 1 2 3 . . . . . . CRITICAL THINKING RUBRIC RUBRIC COURTESY OF W. S. U. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY PULLMAN, WA. 99164. LIKERT SCALE WEIGHT DISTRIBUTION : 1 : Strongly Disagree; 5 : Strongly Agree1 Concept Mapping 3 4 3 . . . . . . 32 Structured Content 3 4 4 . . . . . . 4 Data Collected by Mysore Narayanan.APPENDIX E : Bar chart generated based on EXCEL Spreadsheet data
hasbecome the basis for a series of lab activities in Photovolatics II, our new battery-based solar course.System Design Loads: A 1-Watt LED light (Holly Solar) was chosen to run from dusk to dawn automatically (per charge controller setting which is up to 12 hours on June 21 in Peru) [6]. A 12 VDC powered USB port provides constant power for phone charging (2 amps x 5 V). These loads add up to 43.5 Watt-hours per day, or 3.6 Amp-hours/day for a 12 VDC system.Load assessmentDesign name: Peru systemInput the watts and quantity of the load (s)How many hours will you run the light during the shortest day of the year? Hours/ Average Load Watts Quantity Total Watts
organization and is a member of the American Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Mr. Behzad Beigpourian
thematic ‘semi-structured’ interviews (Flick, 2009). Resultswill be coded using open coding technique (Glaser & Strauss, 1999). Data collection should starton the second semester 2019. We expect to collect around 600 participants in the quantitativephase and around 30 in the qualitative phase.ReferencesAuthor (2019). Antro-Diseño. Santiago: Ediciones UC (in press)Burke, R.J., (2007). Women and minorities in STEM: a primer. In R.J. Burke and M.C. Maitis (Eds.), Women and Minorities in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Upping the numbers (pp. 3-7). Bodmin, Cornwall: MPG Books Ltd.Cabrera, A. F. & La Nasa, S. (2000). On the path to college: Three critical tasks facing America's disadvantaged. Center for the
with Character, Building Connections, andEngaging in Extraordinary Conversations. New York, NY: SelectBooks, Inc., 2017.[7] D. Kiel, “4 Strategies for Closing the Coaching Gap for Mid-Level Academic Leaders,”Academic Impressions, April 3, 2018. [Online]. Available: Academic Impressions,https://www.academicimpressions.com/4-strategies-coaching-academic-leaders. [Accessed April3, 2018].[8] K. Rockquemore. Finding Your Post-Tenure Pathway. Inside Higher Ed. 2017. [Online].Available: Inside Higher Ed, https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2017/08/30/introductory-advice-academics-who-have-just-become-tenured-essay. [Accessed August 30, 2017].[9] S. Jaschik, Unhappy Associate Professors. Inside Higher Ed. 2012. [Online]. Available:Inside Higher Ed
Tool for EngineeringDesign Assessment. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education. Seattle, WA. Bodnar, C., Clark, R., Besterfield-Sacre, M. (2015). Lessons learned through sequential offerings of an innovation andentrepreneurship boot camp for sophomore engineering students. The Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship. 6(5), 52–67. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S., & Weilerstein, P. (2013). Entrepreneurship: Its role in engineering education. NationalAcademy of Engineering The Bridge: Linking Engineering and Society, (Summer), 35–40. Chesler, N., Arastoopour, G., D’Angelo, C.M., Bagley, E., & Shaffer, D.W. (2013). Design of a professional practice simulatorfor educating and motivating first-year
is this Important? • Recent article to illustrate idea • Cultural diversity lesson • Student panel Required: • Global Engineer PowerPoint • GlobeSmart Profile • Cultural Intelligence video • Whiteboard or large paper for notes • Student Volunteer(s)Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright ©2018 American Society for Engineering Education Session CEED 442Working in
and industry to cooperate in providing the very bestprogram for the engineering students, bulding a strong foundation for their selected career.Advisory Board The constituency for a particular program consists of three parts, the student(s), thefaculty for the program, and the industry community served by the graduates. The board doesnot have to be particularly large or complex, it simply must be able to evaluate the effectivenessof a particular program in fulfilling the expectations of the students in preparing for their futurecareer and the needs of the industrial opportunities for the student. While the particularcurriculum generally cannot be tailored to a specific industry within the local area, it can providesome emphasis for
others do team projectswith two or three people on a team. All projects are managed by the student(s) and all projectshave team members from the company sponsoring the project. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference for Industry and Education Collaboration Copyright2018, American Society for Engineering Education Session ETD 325Students doing individual projects qualify for entry in the annual Missouri SouthernUndergraduate Research Symposium. In the spring of 2016, we had students take 1st and 2ndplace and in the spring of 2017, we had one student take 1st place in their respective categories.4. Project DeliverablesThe
Cruz. At UMBC, faculty areencouraged to attend monthly teaching and learning center training. Monthly workshops atteaching and learning center at Alaska.yes. Teaching academy, meets once a month during lunch (at the collegelevel). Typically attended by faculty in the first two years. Summer faculty institute at Baylor.Faculty are encouraged to attend, but not required. With the pressures of the tenure track, theyoften don’t go. For teaching, faculty are encouraged to sit in on other people’s classrooms. 3. How is the information provided during orientation(s) reinforcedduring their first year? Second year and on through promotion?Workshops held on a regular basis to discuss teaching, research, and other topics. Grant writingworkshops are
closest match available in the market; anexplanation is provided about why the proposed design is cost-effective. Results from selectedapplications using the dynamometer have been presented. Potential other applications for thedynamometer have been proposed. It is hoped that this paper will help other engineering educatorsbuild their own dynamometer using the designs described in this paper.Acknowledgements:The authors would like to thank Denso Foundation for their support for senior design projects at Trineduring 2015-2017. The dynamometer discussed here was built using funding from Denso Foundation.References:[1]. Harding, G. L., & Prygoski, M., & Burns, J., & Carmichael, B. J., & Engstrom, M. S. (2018, June), APortable Engine
includes a prediction of an even greater shortage: To grow our nation’s science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) capacity and ensure that Americans nationwide can participate in a science and engineering (S& E) intensive economy, the United States must foster its Skilled Technical Workforce (STW) – individuals who use S & E skills in their jobs but do not have a bachelor’s degree. Rapid changes in the nature of work, education, technology, workforce demographics, and international competition have led to the National Science Board (NSB, Board) to conclude that our competiveness, security, and research enterprise require this critical, but often overlooked segment of our STEM-capable workforce. Adding to
data that could be of use wouldbe to test the various implementations with a different course instructor, and look for similarperformance differences. In conclusion, when some of principle problems associated withteaching and learning programming are analyzed, modified lecture with SI seems to offer somepositive initial results.References[1] D. Sleeman, “The challenges of teaching computer programming,” Communications of theACM, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1986.[2] S. Sentance and A. Csizmadia, “Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies froma teacher’s perspective,” Educ. Inf. Technol., Vol. 22, pp.469-495, 2017.[3] M. Ben-Ari, “Constructivism in computer science education,” Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on
also technology transfer and universityresearch administrators.References[1] H.A. Howard, D. Zwicky, M. Phillips, “Academic Libraries Support Cross-Disciplinary Innovation and Entrepreneurship,” Libraries Faculty and Staff Scholarship and Research, Paper 206, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/lib_fsdocs/206 [Accessed February 15 ,2019].[2] J.P. Shipman and B.A. Ulmer, ed. Information and Innovation. A Natural Combination for Health Sciences Libraries. Lanham, Boulder, New York: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.[3] C. Elliott, J. Dewland, J.R. Martin, S. Kramer, and J.J. Jackson Sr., “Collaborate and Innovate: The impact of academic librarians on the commercialization of university
classrooms,” International Journal of Science Education, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 687–698, Jul. 1999, doi: 10.1080/095006999290516.[2] S. L. Westbrook and E. A. Marek, “A cross-age study of student understanding of the concept of diffusion,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 649–660, 1991, doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280803.[3] E. A. Marek, C. C. Cowan, and A. M. L. Cavallo, “Students’ Misconceptions about Diffusion: How Can They Be Eliminated?,” The American Biology Teacher, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 74–77, 1994, doi: 10.2307/4449757.[4] U. Wilensky and M. Resnick, “Thinking in Levels: A Dynamic Systems Approach to Making Sense of the World,” Journal of Science Education and Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Mar
] Rattan, A., Good, C., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). “It's ok — Not everyone can be good at math”: Instructors with an entity theorycomfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(3), 731–737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012[2] “Minority Serving Institutions: Americas’ Underutilized Resource for Strengthening the STEM Workforce,” The NationalAcademies Press, Washington DC (2019). DOI: https://doi.org/10.17226/25257[3] Yosso, T. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race ethnicityand education, 8(1), 69-91.[4] Smith, J. M., & Lucena, J. C. (2016). Invisible innovators: how low-income, first-generation students use their funds ofknowledge to belong in
on pedagogicalmethods, or seeing methods used by other instructors. SEEFs shared common motivations ofjoining a career involving instruction motivated by experiences during student teaching roles,and a desire to improve teaching practices. In addition, the SEEF community referred to Barkleyet al.’s handbook [29] on collaborative learning techniques provided a wealth of teachingmethods, along with Godsell’s sourcebook [30] which provided perspective on differentmethods, their implementation and evaluation, among many other sources. However common toall the SEEFs was interpreting the application of these methods to fit their discipline. Forexample, in Computer Science the jigsaw method was used to explore the ethics of human-computer
external evaluator collects evaluation data on each cohort and each component of thetraineeship according to our logic model-based evaluation plan. At the time of paper submissionwe do not yet have results of the first year’s evaluation.AcknowledgmentThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.DGE-1828942.[1] E. Golde and G. Walker, Eds., Envisioning the Future of Doctoral Education: Preparing Stewards of the Discipline. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2006.[2] C. G. P. Berdanier, A. Talley, S. E. Branch, B. Ahn, and M. F. Cox, "A strategic blueprint for the alignment of doctoral competencies with disciplinary expectations," International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 32
lack of participants understanding other points of view and a lack ofconnectedness with other participants. In prior years, this lack of connection led to studentsstruggling with at least two components of the engineering design process: 1. students werereluctant to collaborate with their peers, as they were often “stuck” on using their own ideas and2. students had difficulty defining the purpose for their designs, or in other words, difficultyexplaining the problem(s) they were trying to solve [13]. These findings were a springboard forconsidering how to effectively integrate empathy and engineering as the thread which weaves theprogram together. Program designers intentionally wove empathy connections with people’sreal-life stories into the
Paper ID #29421Engaging High-School Students in Building Prefabrication (ResourceExchange)Luciana Debs, Purdue University Programs Luciana Debs, is an Assistant Professor of Construction Management in the School Construction Manage- ment Technology at Purdue University. She received her PhD from Purdue University Main Campus. Her previous degrees include a MS from the Technical Research Institute of Sao Paulo (IPT-SP), and BArch from the University of S˜ao Paulo (USP), in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Prior to her current position she worked in design coordination in construction and real estate development companies in Brazil. Her
: Generalizability of the methodology is one of the most important extensions offuture work. Integration of a custom-built sentiment classifier and an automatic ontology buildingfunctionality potentially through a combination of ontology learning techniques will be sought.References[1]. George A. Miller. 1995. WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 11 (November 1995), 39– 41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/219717.219748[2]. M. Hu and B. Liu, "Mining opinion features in customer reviews," in AAAI, 2004, pp. 755-760.[3]. N. Gupta, S. Chandra, Product Feature Discovery and Ranking for Sentiment Analysis from Online Reviews, Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, pp 542-55, 2013.
Technology at Farmingdale YEONG S. RYU graduated from Columbia University with a Ph.D. and Master of Philosophy in Mechan- ical Engineering in 1994. He has served as an associate professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at Farmingdale State College (SUNY) since 2006. In addition, he has conducted various research projects at Xerox Corporation (1994-1995), Hyundai Motor Corporation (1995-1997), and New Jersey Institute of Technology (2001-2003). He has been teaching and conducting research in a broad range of areas of system identification and control of nonlinear mechatronic systems and vibrations in structures requir- ing precision pointing to eliminate the detrimental effects of such diverse disturbance sources
Educational Research Association and American Evaluation Association, in addition to ASEE. Dr. Brawner is also an Exten- sion Services Consultant for the National Center for Women in Information Technology (NCWIT) and, in that role, advises computer science and engineering departments on diversifying their undergraduate student population. She remains an active researcher, including studying academic policies, gender and ethnicity issues, transfers, and matriculation models with MIDFIELD as well as student veterans in engi- neering. Her evaluation work includes evaluating teamwork models, broadening participation initiatives, and S-STEM and LSAMP programs.Mr. Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University at West Lafayette
essentialcomponent of the student outcomes that must be assessed and evaluate and result be used as aninput for continuous improvement of engineering programs [1]. In most undergraduate engineeringcourses, students are assigned to research or design projects. These typically include the capstonedesign course(s) and some other upper division courses in the program. In large classes, studentsare either encouraged or required to complete projects in groups consisting of several teammembers.Formation of design teams and assigning grades to individual team member is a challenging taskfor the instructor. Some instructors have had students take personality tests to help place studentsinto balanced groups [2]. In one study the design formation methodologies were