and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 3Presenter Name(s):1) Last Yang First Lija Affiliation Member, K-12 Educator2) Last Portsmore First Merredith Affiliation Member, University Faculty3) Last Milto First Elissa Affiliation MemberContact Person’s Name: Lija YangContact Person’s Email: lija.yang@tufts.eduContact Person’s Phone: 617-627-5888 Page 18.21.2Contact Person’s Alternate Phone
! Deadline Friday, January 23, 2015 by 5:00PM EST Presenters will be notified of acceptance status by March 14. Late submissions will not be accepted. Advanced Workshop Registration will open December 6, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 1Presenter Name(s):1) Last Heil First David Affiliation Foundation for Family Science & Engineering2
person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 3Presenter Name(s):1) Last Holly, Jr. First James Affiliation Purdue University2) Last Glancy First Aran W. Affiliation University of Minnesota3) Last Moore First Tamara J. Affiliation Purdue UniversityContact Person’s Name: James Holly, JrContact Person’s Email: jhollyjr@purdue.eduContact Person’s Phone: 313-461-5663 Page 18.24.2Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: 651-263-84332015-ASEE-K12Workshop-Proposal-RehashYour Trash
! Deadline Friday, January 23, 2015 by 5:00PM EST Presenters will be notified of acceptance status by March 14. Late submissions will not be accepted. Advanced Workshop Registration will open December 6, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last Schell First William Affiliation Montana State University2) Last Glime First John
more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last Vezino First Beau Affiliation University of Arizona2) Last Weiler First Scott Affiliation Amphitheater Middle School3) Last First AffiliationContact Person’s Name: Beau VezinoContact Person’s Email: beauvezino@email.arizona.eduContact Person’s Phone: 4802081967 Page 18.6.2Contact Person’s Alternate Phone:Creative Engineering & Programming with MaKey MaKey invention
. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 1Presenter Name(s):1) Last Oakes First William Affiliation Purdue University EPICS2)Contact Person’s Name: William OakesContact Person’s Email: oakes@purdue.eduContact Person’s Phone: 765-494-3892Contact Person’s Alternate Phone: 765-418-8029 Page 18.20.22015-ASEE-K12-Proposal-Form_EPICS_SL_submit.docx
! Deadline Friday, January 23, 2015 by 5:00PM EST Presenters will be notified of acceptance status by March 14. Late submissions will not be accepted. Advanced Workshop Registration will open December 6, 2013. SUBMISSION INFORMATIONProvide the first and last name of each presenter, including affiliations. If there is more than onepresenter, designate one person as the organizer and provide only that person’s contactinformation. The organizer is responsible for communicating to co-presenters.Number of Presenters: 2Presenter Name(s):1) Last Moskal First Barbara Affiliation Professor, Colorado School of Mines2
: Practices and Analyses]. 2015. No. 1. Pp.7-17.[2] Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D.R., Edström K. Rethinking Engineering Education: TheCDIO Approach. (In Russian). M. 2015. P. 89.[3] Ivanov V.G., Galikhanov M.F., Barabanova S.V., Guzhova A.A. Presidential Program for the Training ofEngineers. Experience of a Research University// IGIP/ICL Intern.Conf. Dubai, 2014. ID: 282.[4] Programma razvitiya Kamskogo innovatsionnogo territorialno-proizvodstvennogo klastera na period do 2020goda [Development Program of Kama Regional Innovation Production Cluster for the Period till 2020] (in Russian;approved on April 17, 2012). Page
education in Russia in numbers. / A.L.Arefiev, M.A. Arefiev / / HigherEducation in Russia. - 2012 . - № 3 - p.122 -131 . S. 125.2 . Presidential Decree of 7 May 2012 № 594.+ Page 20.35.6
Appropriate Technology, 2013 Masters Thesis.Mortenson Center for Engineering in Developing Communities, CU Boulder(8) Bitler, M., & Haider, S. J. “An Economic View of Food Deserts in the United States.Understanding the Economic Concepts and Characteristics of Food Access” Department ofAgriculture-Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS) 2009(9) City-Data. Westwood neighborhood in Denver, Colorado (CO), 80219 detailed profile.Visited October 2012. .(10) Re:Vision International. Our Impact. Visited October 2012. Page 20.38.6.Page 20.38.7
agricultural vehicles," IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symp, pp. 473-478, May 2008.[6] C. Aloisio, et.al., “Next generation image guided citrus fruit picker,” IEEE Int. Conf. Technologies for Practical Robot Applications, pp. 37-41, Apr. 2012.[7] ABET, “Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs“, http://www.abet.org/, Oct. 2012.[8] S. Batchelder et.al., “An Analysis of Future Sustainable Aquatic Farming”, Interactive Qualifying Project Report, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-031212- 191226/unrestricted/Final_Paper.pdf, Mar. 2012.[9] B. Ingram et.al., "A code of ethics for robotics engineers," ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction, pp.103-104, Mar. 2010.[10] M
Teaching Enterprise Application Development”, Information Systems Education Journal, Vol. 4, No. 50, pp 1-7, August 8, 2006 [16] Auer, M. E., Pester, A. 2007. Toolkit for Distributed Online-Lab Grids. In: Advances on remote laboratories and e-learning experiences, 2007, University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain. [17] V. J. Harward, J. A. del Alamo, S. R. Lerman P. H. Bailey, J. Carpenter, et. al., "The iLab Shared Architecture: A Web Services Infrastructure to Build Communities of Internet Accessible Laboratories," Proceedings of the IEEE , vol.96, no.6, pp.931-950, June 2008. [18] Felknor, C., DeLong, K. 2006. iLabs Service Broker Complete Machine Build, 2006, MIT iCampus, Cambridge MA, USA
development will be discussed.Overview of Engineering Curriculum DevelopmentsThe quality of engineering education and the ability to recruit a U.S. engineering workforce hasbeen a growing concern among engineers in university and industrial settings. In the 1990’s,ABET, the engineering accreditor of postsecondary degree-granting programs, revamped theprogram outcomes and assessment criteria to improve quality by implementing the EngineeringCriteria 2000 (EC2000).5 Beginning in 2001, all accredited engineering programs were requiredto demonstrate that their graduates possess the following eleven skills (known as a-k): ≠ Ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering; ≠ Ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to
and J. Brooks Zurn, “Evaluation of Tablet PCs for engineering content development and instruction”, Proceedings of the 111th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 20-23, 2004.2. Kuldeep S. Rawat, George B. Riddick, and Lakiesha J. Moore, “Work in Progress – Integrating Mobile Tablet- PC Technology and Classroom Management Software in Undergraduate Electronic Engineering Technology Courses”, 38th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2008.3. Amelito Enriquez, “Developing an Interactive Learning Network Using Tablet PCs in Sophomore-Level Engineering Courses”, Proceedings of the 114th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual
students who have insufficient Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationrequisites for one or more courses. To avoid problems during registration, students, inincreasing numbers, are visiting advisors first to make sure they have the proper requisitesand to receive advisement on courses to take. In Fig. 3, the black squares indicate the totalpercentage of registrations in all courses of the respective program appearing to violaterequisite(s). 25 21.1 20
and industry partners, LTU administrationdecided to expand its global engineering program in early 2003 to include Chineseinstitutions. LTU’s President and Provost visited various Chinese universities in late 2002and early 2003 resulting in a Memorandum of Agreement with the Shanghai Universityof Engineering and Sciences (SUES) in 2003.LTU’s Global Engineering partnership in ChinaBeginning in the 1980’s China initiated a multitude of internal and external reformsdesigned to align its economic and educational infrastructure with Western standards.According to Li Deshui, head of the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics (NBS), China'seconomic growth reached a seven-year high at 9.1 percent in 2003. Official statisticsshow China's automobile
Reasoning Skills," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 87, no. 1, 1998, pp. 29-34.[3] Drake, M., Griffin, P., Kirkman, R., and Swann, J., “Engineering Ethical Curricula:Assessment and Comparison of Two Approaches,” Journal of Engineering Education, toappear.[4] Rest, J., Development in judging moral issues, University of Minnesota Press,Minneapolis, 1979.[5] Thoma, S.J., "Do moral education programs facilitate moral judgment? A meta-anaylsisof studies using the Defining Issues Test," Moral Education Forum, vol. 9, no. 4, 1984, pp.20-25.[6] Schaefli, A., J. Rest, and S. Thoma, "Does moral education improve moral judgment? Ameta-analysis of intervention studies using the Defining Issues Test," Review of EducationalResearch, vol. 55, no. 3, 1985
Session 2155 Revisiting the Urgency for Reform of Faculty Reward Systems to Advance Professional Graduate Education for Engineering Practice and Technology Leadership D. R. Depew, 1 G. R. Bertoline, 1 M. J. Dyrenfurth, 1 A. L. McHenry, 2 E. M. DeLoatch, 3 P. Y. Lee, 4 H. J. Palmer, 5 J. W. Bardo, 6 D. D. Dunlap, 6 S. J. Tricamo, 7 D. A. Keating, 8 T. G. Stanford 8 Purdue University 1/ Arizona State University East 2/ Morgan State University 3 California Polytechnic State University 4 / Rochester Institute of Technology 5 Western Carolina University 6/ New Jersey Institute
ideal performance of your neighbor's diesel generator, assuming that the engine undergoes an air-standard Diesel cycle with a compression ratio of 26.0. The air in the piston-cylinder is at 105. [kPa] and 15.0 [C] just prior to the isentropic compression process. The maximum temperature in the cycle is not to exceed 2200 [K]. For cold air-standard we assume constant specific heats at 300 [K]. Draw the P v and T s diagrams for the cycle. The highest pressure in the cycle is: Answer: [0/5 tries] The amount of heat transferred into one cycle is: Answer: [0/5 tries] The work out of the isentropic expansion process for one cycle is: Answer: [0/5 tries] The thermal
us havebeen dragged into the assessment process by accrediting agencies, it must be a servant forimprovement not a process for its own sake or for the sake of accreditation. EleanorRoosevelt once said “Learn from the mistakes of others, you can't live long enough to makethem all yourself.” Engineering faculty must learn from the mistakes of others, deal with thedifferences among evaluators, and share what is learned to improve our lot in assessment.References[1] Blanchard, S. M., et. al., Rubrics Cubed: Tying Grades to Assessment to Reduce FacultyWorkloads, session 1609, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition.[2] Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, Effective for
Society for Engineering EducationBackgroundEngineering programs at UMD are relatively new, originating in the mid 1980’s with threeprograms that were prescribed to be different from those existing on the Twin Cities campus of theUniversity of Minnesota. Our original mix of programs, consequently, was an interestingcollection of Computer Engineering, Industrial Engineering, and Materials ProcessingEngineering, in order to avoid the “traditional” programs that existed in the Twin Cities. As ourprograms have matured, the restrictions imposed by the Twin Cities campus have relaxed, and thethree original programs evolved into Electrical and Computer, Industrial, and ChemicalEngineering programs, respectively. Two years ago we added a Mechanical
, 1997, p viii.6. Brumm, T. J., S. K. Mickelson, B. L. Steward and A. L. Kaleita-Forbes, “Competency-based outcomes assessment for agricultural engineering programs,” International Journal of Engineering Education, 2004, in press.7. Brumm, T.J., A. Ellertson and S.K. Mickelson, “Using ePortfolios to Develop and Assess ABET-Aligned Competencies,” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, American Society for Engineering Education, Nashville, TN, June 2003.8. Mickelson, S.K., T.J. Brumm, and B.L. Steward, “Using Competency Feedback to Assess Agricultural Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education, American Society for
effectiveness of the proposed model. One of the options might be theGlobalSpec2 web site with such categories as “Sensors, Transducers and Detectors”, “LaboratoryEquipment and Scientific Instruments”, “Networking and Communication Equipment”, “IndustrialMaintenance”, etc.In the wide variety of technology, communications, information systems, and engineeringprofessions, keeping students and professionals current in their field(s) of expertise becomes anissue of competitiveness and employability. That is why a cycling approach in maintaining a goodknowledge management system is so important: knowledge must be periodically updated to reflectchanges in the relevant engineering and technology fields.To this extent, a technology and engineering knowledge
(1997), “Developing and Using Cases to Teach Practical Ethics,” Teaching Philosophy, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 353–385.Additional Resources for Teaching Engineering Ethics: C. E. Harris, M. S. Pritchard, and M. J. Rabins, Engineering Ethics: Concepts and Cases, 2nd ed., Wadsworth/Thompson Learning, 2000. D. G. Johnson, Ethical Issues in Engineering, Prentice-Hall, 1991. M. W. Martin and R. Schinzinger, Ethics in Engineering, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1996. Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science: http://onlineethics.org. National Institute for Engineering Ethics: http://www.niee.org.Biographical InformationJIMMY H. SMITH, Ph.D., P.E., Video Project Director and Executive Producer, Professor of Civil Engineering
Human Factor in Engineering; John H. Burgess4 – FDA, US Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health5 – Paramedic Emergency Care, Robert S. Porter, Brady, 2nd EditionThomas G. Boronkay, PhD, PE is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology department at theUniversity of Cincinnati. He received his PhD from the University of Cincinnati. He has presented papers at ASEEAnnual Conferences, ASME International Congress, and several international conferences and conductedCAD/CAM/CAE workshops nationally and internationally. He has also served in various capacities on the DEED,EDG and International Divisions’ executive committees.Janak Dave PhD, PE is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Technology department
machining practices book (Kibbe)3 and a lab manual created at Penn state.The lab manual specifically detailed the student’s assignment(s) within each module. Withineach module, the students were required to read the appropriate textbook material (Degarmo andKibbe) pertaining to the module they were assigned, complete the homework assignments, andfamiliarize themselves with the components for each machine. The lab instructor would thendemonstrate the proper operation of the machines to each group of 3 students. Each module wasperformed by a group of 3 students during which they would each manufacture small pre-designed projects as a demonstration of their understanding of each process. This class wasnever intended to train students to be proficient
Introducing Practical County and City Management to Undergraduate Students through the Course “Public Works Engineering and Management Practices” Dr. Fazil T. Najafi and Hammad S. ChaudhryProfessor, Department of Civil & Coastal Engineering, University of Florida/ Ph.D. Student, Department of Civil & Coastal Engineering, University of FloridaIn every country, healthy infrastructure is essential to economic and social developmentof communities, regions, and nations. A public works department focuses on all criticalissues related to city and county infrastructure management and operations. A publicworks engineering and management course has been developed within the
. Page 10.112.3 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2005, American Society for Engineering EducationIt is our conclusion that this short course has been highly successful for those faculty memberswho dedicated themselves to regular participation. Long-term tracking of course participantproductivity in biological or biomedical research areas and/or involving new collaboration(s)with life scientists (in comparison to the Fulton School faculty overall) has been initiated withthe expectation that participants will in the long-term be better positioned for success in suchefforts.References1. For on-line information on this transdisciplinary
capstone course, and for this course projects are selected to build,or perform significant upgrades on a production machine. The end use of these machines is theeducation laboratory. This simplifies the task for students to define the scope of the project, as they havesome experience in the application.Since the focus of the course is plastic manufacturing systems, projects are machines that incorporatesome manufacturing process, such as injection molding, blow molding, extrusion, or bow molding.Figure 3 illustrates a typical project. The basis for this project was a small injection moldermanufactured by Arburg in the 1970’s. Students were charged with renovating the machine to includeadding modern controls, rebuilding the hydraulic system, adding
environment and communications.References Page 10.871.7 1. James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones “ Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and create wealth in Your Corporation ” Lean Enterprise Institute, 2004. 2. A. W. Astin “What Matters in College?: Four Critical years Revised,” Jossey- Bass publishers, San Francisco, 1993. 3. PUGH, S., “ An Engineering student Retention: National and International Perspectives” Proceedings of Engineering Education Conference, pp. 843-851, 1988. 4. C. Moller-Wong and A. Eide “ An Engineering student Retention Study” Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 86, No.1, January 1997.Biographical