: Needs of Returning and Direct-Pathway Students,” in 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, Indianapolis, Indiana: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2014, p. 24.1238.1-24.1238.13. doi: 10.18260/1-2--23171.[13] J. J. Varney, “The role of dissertation self-efficacy in increasing dissertation completion: sources, effects and viability of a new self-efficacy construct,” College Student Journal, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 932–947, Dec. 2010.[14] Committee on Effective Mentoring in STEMM, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEMM. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2019, p
Expertise and Knowledge Fluency in Design and Innovation,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research, A. Johri and B. M. Olds, Eds. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.[6] A. W. Johnson and J. E. S. Swenson, “Open-Ended Modeling Problems in a Sophomore- Level Aerospace Mechanics of Materials Courses,” presented at the 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2019. Accessed: Nov. 02, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/open-ended-modeling-problems-in-a-sophomore-level-aerospace- mechanics-of-materials-courses[7] E. Treadway, J. E. S. Swenson, and A. W. Johnson, “Open-Ended Modeling Group Projects in Introductory Statics and Dynamics Courses,” presented at the
–329, 2005, publisher: American School Counselor Association. [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732626 [4] M. Kargarmoakhar, M. Ross, Z. Hazari, M. Weiss, M. Georgiopoulos, K. Christensen, and T. Solis, “Computing Pathways: A Quantitative Inquiry into the Dynamic Pathways of Students in Computing with Gender Comparisons,” 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, Jun. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10194755-computing-pathways- quantitative-inquiry-dynamic-pathways-students-computing-gender-comparisons [5] J. Margolis and A. Fisher, Unlocking the clubhouse: Women in computing. MIT press, 2002. [6] J. Zhu, L. Zahedi, and M. S. Ross, “Evaluating Publications’ Keywords in Computer
his team received for the best paper published in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008, 2011, and 2019 and from the IEEE Transactions on Education in 2011 and 2015. Dr. Ohland is an ABET Pro- gram Evaluator for ASEE. He was the 2002–2006 President of Tau Beta Pi and is a Fellow of the ASEE, IEEE, and AAAS. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Introduction Engineering classrooms have adopted team-based learning as a popular and effectivepedagogy for a long time [1-3]. Given the booming of computer-assisted learning technologies,instructors could easily observe the different ways of interaction and collaboration across teamsand among team
on by the engineering students inthe spring 2019 section of ME 450 Aircraft Design. The new motors were researched, procured,and installed on the Stewart platform during the spring of 2019. However, testing of the largermotors by these students was severely limited due to the moving of the new School ofEngineering to new facilities (including all new laboratories) during the summer of 2019. Besides the changing of student team members from the original group, this movebrought additional challenges to the project since the simulator and all the associated equipmenthad to be disassembled and boxed up for the relocation to the new lab space. But the move hasrecently been completed, and now a new multidisciplinary team of five
., Honeycutt, C. F., Judson, E., Krause, S. J., Middleton, J. A., Hjelmstad, K. D., Hjelmstad, K. A., Mayled, L., & Culbertson, R. J. (2019, June). Examining effects of an evidence-based professional development program on student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) conference, Tampa, FL.[14] Mayled, L., Ross, L., Krause, S. J., Hjelmstad, K. D., Judson, E., Middleton, J. A., Culbertson, R. J., Hjelmstad, K. L., & Glassmeyer, K. (2019, June). Impact of evidence- based active learning faculty development on low-SES engineering students’ achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE
,” Race Ethnicity and Education, vol. 8, issue 1, pp. 69-91, 2005.[10] S. M. Lord, M. M. Camacho, C. E. Brawner, J. B. Main, and C. Mobley, Military veteran students’ pathways in engineering education (Year 5), ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, June 16-19, 2019, Tampa, Florida.[11] J. B. Main, M. M. Camacho, C. Mobley, C. E. Brawner, S. M. Lord, and H. Kesim, “Technically and tactically proficient: How military leadership training and experiences are enacted in engineering education,” International Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 35, no. 2. pp. 446–457, 2019.[12] C. Carrigan, E. A. Riskin, J. L. Borgford-Parnell, P. N. Mody-Pan, D. Wiggin, and S. Cunningham, Learning from Pell-eligible
levels over the past two decades. [1,9] AlthoughSTEM education research has flourished, there has yet to be equal activity in the propagation of theseinnovations, as the National Research Council (NRC) highlighted. [10] The NRC called for the propagationof engineering education research into practice, including adopting evidence-based practices. Further, theneed for more successful propagation has also been highlighted by an ASEE report [11] that included anappeal to funding agencies to use resources to propagate better efforts that have proven successful.Although educational innovations have been produced over the past few decades, Rogers highlights aneed for knowledge of how to implement the innovation correctly and a lack of underlying
Instructor and the Tenured Faculty”, International Journal on E-Learning, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5-22. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 2008.[2] M. Goryll, T.J. Thornton, C. Wang, S.M. Phillips, D. and Allee, “Online Undergraduate Laboratories in Electrical Engineering”, 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp 1-4, 2019.[3] Y. Astatke, C.J. Scott, K.A. Connor, J.O. Ladeji-Osias, “Online Delivery of Electrical Engineering Laboratory Courses”, ASEE Conference, 2012[4] M. Perales, L. Pedraza, and P. Moreno-Ger, “Work-In-Progress: Improving Online Higher Education with Virtual and Remote Labs”, 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), pp. 1136-1139, 2019.[5
] T. Estrada and S. Atwood, “Factors that Affect Student Frustration Level in Introductory Laboratory Experiences,” en, in 2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceed- ings, San Antonio, Texas: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2012, pp. 25.629.1–25.629.7. DOI: 10. 18260/1-2--21386. [8] E. Burkholder, A. M. Price, M. Flynn, and C. E. Wieman, “Assessing problem-solving in sci- ence and engineering programs,” in 2019 Physics Education Research Conference Proceed- ings, Provo, UT: American Association of Physics Teachers, Jan. 2020. DOI: 10.1119/ perc.2019.pr.Burkholder. [9] S. Fitzgerald, R. McCauley, B. Hanks, L. Murphy, B. Simon, and C. Zander, “Debugging From the Student Perspective,” en, IEEE Transactions on
theoptimization applications was designed to be consistent with the activation of the neuralnetworks reported in MRI studies on engineering students, physics professors and hapticlearners. The effectiveness of the optimization approach would confirm the assertion put forth inan ASEE previous presentation that engineering physics is a universal donor degree. It wouldalso provide a means by which to implement the recommendation presented in another previousASEE paper in which the engineering students’ conclusion was “the learning of physics beingirrelevant in their third semester after completing introductory physics”. The contrast betweenthe van Hiele learning model and Bloom’s taxonomy model on educational learning objectives inthe learning of physics is
Hydrology and Water Resources Engineering and an M.S. in Geological Sciences.Dr. Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan Dr. Cynthia Finelli is Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Professor of Education, and Director and Graduate Chair for Engineering Education Research Programs at University of Michi- gan. She is Fellow of both the ASEE and the Institute for Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), associate editor for the European Journal of Engineering Education, and member of the Governing Board of the Research in Engineering Education Network. She was previously chair of EECHA, chair of the ERM Division of ASEE, co-chair of the ASEE Committee on Scholarly Publications, deputy editor for
% of these students had applied toengineering). Historically, students not in the CoE were not allowed to enroll in engineeringcourses, with the exception of a version of the hands-on first-year design (FYD) course that wasoffered specifically to pre-engineering students from 2014 to 2019 (with 60 to 120 seatsavailable each year). Historical data found that only a small percentage of the pre-engineeringstudents ultimately transferred into the CoE (~15%). This was likely due to a combination of thechallenges, such as meeting the grade requirements in core transfer courses (e.g., math, physics,chemistry) and/or students losing their motivation for engineering. A new initiative in the CoEextended the opportunity to ES students (in this study
for 11weeks) and their group final presentation and ability to answer questions well (50 points).Table 3 shows the course grading percentages for all components of the course for 2018, 2019,2021, and 2022, both pre-project and post-project, so that a comparison of individual versusgroup work can be made. Table 4 shows the project grade, comprehensive final exam grade (thesame final exam is given each year, with only minor edits), and overall course grades withaverages and standard deviations. For a control, the year 2018 is presented. In 2018, there was noproject. Please note that 2020 is not presented as it was during COVID, and the course wastaught asynchronously and remotely with a different final exam. In 2019, when the project
results todetermine the mean and median response for each item on the survey, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test will be used to assess the level of statistical significance. A follow-on conferencepaper detailing these results will be submitted in time for the 2024 ASEE Annual Conference. 11References[1] ABET, "Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019-2020," 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria-for-accrediting- engineering-programs-2019-2020/#GC3. [Accessed 20 1 2023].[2] Herring, Cedric, “Does Diversity Pay? Race, Gender, and the Business Case for Diversity
and pedagogical responses," Journal of Education for Teaching, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 507-516, 2020.[9] A. Dallal and R. M. Clark, "Progressive Use of Active Learning in Electrical Engineering Courses," in ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019.[10] A. Dallal, A. Dukes, and R. M. Clark, "Student performance in partially flipped ECE laboratory classes," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 2020.[11] T. D. Hobbs and L. Hawkins, "The results are in for remote learning: It didn’t work," Wall Street Journal, vol. 5, 2020.
forBiomedicine, BioScience, Volume 65, Issue 2, February 2015, Pages 183–188.[11] Beigpourian, B., & Ohland, M. W. (2019, June), A Systematized Review: Gender and Racein Teamwork in Undergraduate Engineering Classrooms Paper presented at 2019 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition , Tampa, Florida. 10.18260/1-2--32011[12] Ruha Benjamin, Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code, SocialForces, Volume 98, Issue 4, June 2020, Pages 1–3.[13] Accreditation Criteria and Support Documents,http://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditationcriteria/ Accessed on March 4, 2021[14] National Society of Professional Engineers. 2013. NSPE Engineering Body of Knowledge.http://www.nspe.org/sites/default/files/resources/nspe-body-of-knowledge.pdf
graduate students discouraged by the tone of U.S. policies and rhetoric,” ASEE Prism, pp. 24–29, Mar. 2019.[2] E. Redden, “International student numbers decline,” Inside Higher Ed, Nov. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2020/11/16/ survey-new-international-enrollments-drop-43-percent-fall[3] R. M. Lehman and S. C. Conceic¸a˜ o, Motivating and Retaining Online Students: Research- Based Strategies That Work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Brand, 2014, ch. Concerns and Opportunities for Online Student Retention.[4] P. Bawa, “Retention in online courses: Exploring issues and solutions—a literature review,” SAGE Open, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2016.[5] T. Wolf, C. V. Hollot, R
engineering content or methods (Perkins Coppola, 2019).All these aspects of pre-college engineering education including teacher training, curricularalignment with state standards, and policy decisions are not simplified when you add thechallenges that remain regarding socio-cultural perceptions of engineering. One program,Engineering for Us All (e4usa) funded by the National Science Foundation aims to address someof these issues.The e4usa project, led by five US universities, began in 2018 with the goal of creating an all-inclusive high school level engineering curriculum. An introductory course was designed anddeveloped to introduce engineering to high school students with an eye toward providing studentswith college credit for completing the course
institutions.References[1] I. E. Allen and J. Seaman, "Online Report Card Tracking Online Education in the United States," Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group, LLC., 2016.[2] The University of Texas at Dallas, “Educational Technology Services (ETS) Annual Report,” Page 4, 2018-2019, https://dox.utdallas.edu/report31038[3] Fadda, D. and Rios, O., 2019, “Online Computer Aided Design Class,” 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 15 - 19, 2019, Tampa, Florida, USA[4] Fadda, D. and Vinay, R., 2019, “Teaching Computer Aided Design Online,” Proceedings of the ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference, The University of Texas at Tyler, March 10-12, Tyler, Texas, USA.[5] A. Venna, “Instructing face-to-face: Professors cite
Construction Engineering and Management,” Proc. 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[4] Maryam Tabibzadeh and S. Jimmy Gandhi, “Comprehensive analysis of current engineering risk management curriculum,” Proc. 123rd ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[5] W. Robison, Ethics Within Engineering. NY, USA: Bloomsbury Academic, 2017.[6] ASME Policies, Section 15.7 Ethics[7] IEEE Policies, Section 7.8 IEEE Code of Ethics[8] https://riskinnovation.org/think-differently/orphan-risks/[9] S. Hearn, “Outcome Mapping”, http://www.theoryofchange.org/wp-content/uploads/ toco_library/pdf/2001-Hearn-Presentation-Outcome-Mapping-Building-Learning.pdf (accessed August 6, 2019).[10] E. DeBartolo
Initiatives to Promote Engineering Success,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 2018.[2] P. Treuer, and L. Whisler, “Entangled learning: An overview,” retrieved from https://www.EntangledLearning.org, 2019.[3] L. Whisler, and P. Treuer, “How to entangle peer educators,” Synergy, 10, 2017.[4] A. Badir, J. Liao, T. Kunberger, G.I. Papkov, L.D. Nguyen, and R. O'Neill, “Exam Wrappers, Reflection, and Student Performance in Engineering Mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June, 2018.[5] P. Gezer-Templeton, E. Mayhew, D. Korte, and S. Schmidt, “Use of Exam Wrappers to Enhance Students’ Metacognitive Skills in a Large
at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago, IL, April 2003.[5] Gainsburg, J., "The mathematical modeling of structural engineers", Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(1), 3–36, 2006.[6] Gainsburg, J., "The mathematical disposition of structural engineers", Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(5), 477–506, 2007.[7] Cardella, M., “Mathematical Modeling in Engineering Design Projects: Insights from an Undergraduate Capstone Design Project and a Year-Long Graduate Course” Research Gate, Purdue University, 2019.[8] Khan, M., Ibrahim, M., and Wu, N., “A study on Measuring Self-Efficacy in Engineering Modeling and Design Courses", Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, June 24
exists about suchprograms. However, in order to create a program that would be the signature of the departmentand the center of its identity, the design team decided to design a program from the ground up,instead.Having made that decision, the committee members looked to the research literature to find asystem for designing such a program. While graduate programs in engineering education areincreasing in number, they are still relatively few. Worldwide, there are twenty-nine institutionsthat specifically offer engineering/STEM education doctoral programs (ASEE-SD and CELT,2019). As such, there is not a large body of established curricula to inform what and how PhDstudents in engineering education are taught.Our own department of engineering
Paper ID #27395An Improved Cellphone-based Wearable Electrocardiograph Project for aBiomedical Instrumentation Course SequenceDr. Charles Carlson, Kansas State University Charles Carlson received a B.S. degree in Physics from Fort Hays State University in 2013 as well as B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Kansas State University in 2013, 2015, and 2019, respectively. Charles is currently a Graduate Teaching and Research Assistant in Electrical and Computer Engineering at Kansas State University (KSU). He works in the KSU Medical Component Design Laboratory and is interested in engineering
of College Science Teaching, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 14-20, 2007.[8] M. Prince and R. Felder, "Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases," ed: Journal of Engineering Education, 2006, pp. 123- 138.[9] M. Nelson, B. Ahn, and C. Nelson, "Make to Innovate: Blending of Project-based Learning and Flipped Classroom Pedagogies to Provide Real-world Engineering Experiences to Engineering Students ", 126th Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019: ASEE, pp. 1-21.[10] H. L. Tuan *, C. C. Chin, and S. H. Shieh, "The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning," International Journal of Science Education, vol. 27, no. 6
Paper ID #29565Effects of High School Dual Credit Introduction to Engineering Course onFirst-Year Engineering Student Self-Efficacy and the Freshman Experience(Evaluation)Ms. J. Jill Rogers, University of Arizona J. Jill Rogers is the assistant director for ENGR 102 HS at the University of Arizona. ENGR 102 HS is an AP-type, dual credit college level, introductory engineering course offered to high school students. In 2014, the ENGR 102 HS program won the ASEE best practices in K-12 and University partnerships award. Over the years Rogers has developed K-12 science summer camps, conducted K-12 educational re- search
sharing presentations are an instructional tool that can be utilized by otherengineering educators at the university level to provide holistic benefits to students.References[1] E.A. Stephan, L. Whisler, and A. Stephan, “Work in progress: Strategic, translational retention initiatives to promote engineering success,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June 2018.[2] L. Whisler, A. Stephan, and E.A. Stephan, “Promoting metacognitive awareness in a first-year learning strategies course for cohorted general engineering students,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2019, Tampa, Florida, USA, June 2019.[3] E. Kjolsing, and L.V. Den Einde, “Peer instruction: Using isomorphic
Michigan Tech, since 2019. Prior, he was an Associate Professor in the Mechatronics Engineering Department at the German Jordanian University, where he spent 10 years. His industrial experience includes 5 years in software development. He was a senior software engineer in the Laser Color Science and Imaging Department, at Lexmark International, Inc. in Lexington, Kentucky, and with MathWorks, Inc. in Natick-Massachusetts working on software quality engineering for embedded DSP programming using MATLAB and Simulink. His research focus is on unmanned vehicle perception, image analysis, control systems, and mechatronics. Dr. Rawashdeh is a Senior Member of the IEEE. He has worked on projects funded by the NSF, Ford
, 2019.[12] M. Ong, N. Jaumot‐Pascual, and T. Ko. Lily, "Research literature on women of color in undergraduate engineering education: A systematic thematic synthesis," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 109, no. 3, pp. 581-615, 2020.[13] M. Borrego, K. Jennifer, L. D. McNair, and K. Beddoes, "Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review," Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 472-512, 2013.[14] B. Beigpourian, and M. W. Ohland, "A systematized review: Gender and race in teamwork in undergraduate engineering classrooms," In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, June 15-19, 2019.[15] N. M