methods are crucial to make students participate, getmore involved at learning in a significant way, that will last their lifetime. Keywords: excellence in engineering education, interactive teaching methods, hands-on, just in time teaching, peer teaching, clicker, Connect, Jeopardy, CramsterIntroductionDuring the last decade of teaching engineering, the quantity of information to learn hasincreased and the time to acquire this knowledge stayed the same. Maybe the solution tothis problem would be to follow the field of medicine, where they now need to have aBachelor’s degree before starting their doctors program. Skills that used to be part of thebasic formal education of engineers are gone and replaced by new primordial skills
engineering and hydrology. Due to her passion in student learning and success, she is also involved in research in engineering education. She has published several peer- reviewed journals and conference proceedings in her research areas as well as in engineering education. In her teaching pursuits, Sultana integrates real world examples and research with the theoretical knowledge to prepare the future engineers. She has been involved with American Society of Engineering Education Pacific South West section for the past three years. In her current position, Relations with Industry, she collaborates with industry partners to bring their insight in engineering education. She is licensed Professional Engineer from the state of
graduates with Lime Connect is a global nonprofit organization that'sdisabilities face numerous barriers to securing career rebranding disability through achievement. They prepareopportunities. These barriers often prevent individuals with high potential university students and professionals withdisabilities from attaining careers. In fact, the employment disabilities for scholarships, internships and full-timerate for college graduates with disabilities is approximately careers with their corporate partners which include Google,30 percent less than their peers without disabilities, Facebook and Microsoft to name a few. They also have aparticularly in STEM- Science, Technology, Engineering
ASPIRES internship program has three levels targeting students atdifferent stages in their academic careers. The ASPIRES Summer Group Research InternshipProgram is the second level ten-week program for sophomore students who have no previousresearch experience and have at least one more year of courses to complete at Cañada Collegebefore transferring to a four-year university. In addition to allowing students to participate in theprogram as part-time interns, the group setting wherein students work with their peers and facultythey know will give students the supportive learning environment needed to succeed in their firstinternship experience. A collaborative learning environment has been shown to positively impactminority students—improving
, they are inept. Forster3 argues that “The Net generation, it turns out may not beso tech savvy after all”. They rely almost exclusively on Google, Wikipedia and other such Page 13.744.2search engines as major information sources, oblivious of its credibility, reliability and validityfor research. They pay little attention to peer reviewed scholarship. Thus while they may becomputer literate, they are not necessarily information literate although the later uses skills of theformer. The set of skills needed to find, retrieve, analyze and use information is termedinformation literacy (IL). According to the Association of College and Research
AC 2009-1307: INSTRUCTIONAL BENEFITS OF A COURSE MANAGEMENTSYSTEM IN K-12 EDUCATIONPatricia Carlson, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Patricia A. Carlson has taught a variety of professional writing courses at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology and has held ten ASEE Summer Research Fellowships. She is on the editorial board of three professional publications for advanced educational technology and has served as a National Research Council Senior Fellow at the Air Force Human Resources Laboratory. Email: patricia.carlson@rose-hulman.edu Page 14.745.1© American Society for Engineering
comments are provided with the graded draft specification. During t h e first Semester s t u d e n t s a r e g r o u p e d into t h r e e p e r s o n teams. T h e p u r p o s e o f a t e a m is to perform design r e v i e w s o n t h e p r o j e c t o f e a c h team m e m b e r . E a c h s t u d e n t t a k e s a turn in p r e s e n t i n g his o r her p r o j e c t t o the o t h e r t e a m m e m b e r s . These o t h e r t e a m manbers review t h e p r o j e c t t e c h n i c a l l y a n d f r o m a m a n u f a c t u r a b i l i t y , testability, a n d s e r v i c e a b i l i t y p e r s p e c t i v e . Each student is responsible for calling the meeting, running it, and for writing the meeting minutes of
whatthey need to do to reach their educational goals.Pedagogic Practices and Approaches to Engineering and Technology Learning CommunitiesStudents in all learning communities are given guidance on study skills and introduced to thevarious services on campus that support student success. These include our Math AssistanceCenter as well as the Writing Center, the Speaker’s Lab and other relevant tutoring resources. Inaddition, there are other template topics common to every learning community at IUPUI. Theseare detailed in the Template for First-Year Seminars at IUPUI and some of them include thefollowing: understanding the structure of higher education, developing basic communicationskills important in an academic setting, understanding critical
Director Academic Support Center and Instructor, English Composition and First Year Seminar at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. B.A. and M.A. from West Virginia University in English. Interests include college writing, first year experience and peer tutoring administration. Member of College Reading and Learning Association, National Academic Advising Association and National Association for Developmental Education.Robert Martinazzi, University of Pittsburgh-Johnstown Professor of Mechanical Engineering Technology at the University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown. B.S. Aerospace Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh, M.S. Mechanical Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University
generation to the next has told stories to educate and entertain sincehumans left Africa 200,000 years ago1. Children in K-12 learn about the world through firsthearing stories, then reading stories, writing stories and telling stories. In college, students maytake a writing intensive course in which they research a course topic or case study2 and presenttheir findings as an oral story to their peers. They learn by teaching others through stories.There are many different methods of faculty storytelling in the classroom. A teacher may relay astory they have read or heard to emphasize a point, encourage students to tell their ownexperiences that relate to a lecture subject, create a hypothetical story to encourage deeperthinking of a concept or share
Women in Computer Science (WiCS), the Director of the Computer Science Fellows program, and is a KEEN Fellow. She has authored and co- authored over fifty peer-reviewed papers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Code Hardening: Development of a Reverse Software Engineering Project AbstractIn CSI 2334, “Introduction to Computer Systems” (CompSys), at Baylor University, we introduce agroup project to the students whose purpose is to simulate a team project on the job. Group projectsare used very frequently to provide a similar learning environment which capitalizes on the benefitsof peer-to-peer instruction, or cooperative learning. In this group
health of a company. She has published her research in Journal of Business Logistics, International Jour- nal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management and peer-reviewed proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Mary E. Campbell, Texas A&M UniversityMary K. McDougal, Texas A&M UniversityMs. Lauren Neala Holder, Texas A&M University Ph.D. student in geoscience education at Texas A&M University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engagement in Practice: Engaging Undergraduate Students in a Multidisciplinary Service-Learning EnvironmentBackground and motivationIn today’s integrated society, professionals and students alike
), Team activity tracking (tool) Systems and (2) environmental monitoring Information exchange indicator (tool) monitoring (tracking the team’s environmental Stakeholder/customer feedback (tool) conditions) Project plan (artifact) Assisting team members to perform their Discussion boards (tool) tasks. Assistance may occur by (1) Mid project peer evaluation (artifact) Team
Holliday (2007), in a qualitative approach, data are gathered from various sources and evaluatedin a hierarchy to provide new concepts.18 In addition, the nature of this type of research isexploratory and open-ended.19 In the review of ASEE papers it was found that the range ofreferences used in literature review papers was between 30 to 40 papers.20,21 Therefore, more than30 peer-reviewed research papers published after the year 2000 were extracted from fourdatabases: Web of Science, Scopus, Engineering Village, and ASCE Library. The key words usedin search engines include: leadership development in civil engineering, leadership in civilengineering, leadership in construction education, leadership and civil engineering curriculum. Wenarrowed the
development and expanding awareness of opportunities. All of these activities have fostered a tight-knit learn- ing community and provided ample opportunities for peer mentoring and networking with alumnae. Because we focus on recruiting first-year students and retaining them through graduation, the program has grown from nine freshmen in the first year to over forty students now who range from fresh- men to seniors. Our recruitment efforts have become more successful as the program has grown which we attribute to the active involve- ment of current students in recruiting and a record of the programs accomplishments. Retention is higher than expected; moreover, re- tention rates are increasing. Students are excelling academically and
undergraduate world where engineersare often working in groups consisting of peers of different levels of age, knowledge andexperience [1]. Therefore, exposing students to a cross-cohort project would introduce them to anenvironment more similar to what they would experience in the future. This type of projects, hashad positive impact on students’ learning by providing the opportunity for them to see theapplication of theoretical course concepts through design and analysis of engineering systems [2].Literature Review: Current research has shown that multidisciplinary group projects inengineering education is beneficial to students since it better reflects the standard practice inindustry [3, 4]. Though this paper is discussing an interdisciplinary
-represented minority freshmen in science, engineering, and mathematicsdisciplines. The core component of the academic program was mathematics preparation,achieved by offering a pre-calculus course. In addition, courses in science (chemistry) and studyskills were offered. This paper will address the importance of offering mathematics preparationas a part of pre-college programs whose goals are to develop under-represented minoritystudents’ performance and reduce the gap between them and their peers from differentraces/ethnicities. In addition, it will spot light the best practices which have been identified.IntroductionCalculus is a core subject for most of science and engineering fields and it affects student’sretention in science, technology
. Ultimately, the GUIDE program will increase the number of technologicallyprepared workers to meet the increasing demands of American industry.The GUIDE ProgramGUIDE’s major goal is to have students in underrepresented groups succeed academically intheir first two years of study by providing financial aid and personal support. To meet thisobjective, the program provides students with: • a mentor team, • weekly engingeering seminars, • weekly career development workshops, • opportunity to participate in end-of-semester and end-of-year reviews, and • annual scholarship of $2,500 for two years.Below is a short description of the peer mentor teams, student demographics, engineeringseminars, career development workshops, and the review
-impacteducational practices; and meaningful relationships with peers, faculty and staff members, andour business/industry, government, and community partners. In order to ensure student successand to meet the needs of a changing marketplace, we must admit better-prepared and morediverse students to our programs. This requires all of us to be able to tell prospective studentsand other stakeholders about the value our programs offer them. Finally, to tell the storypersuasively, we need to answer this question: “What value are we creating for students whochoose to attend our school, and to what extent is this value differentiated from other institutionsor departments offering similar programs?”The GREAT Environments Task Force placed an emphasis on practices
) and Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) recipient. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014Competing with “Real Classes”: The Value of Performing Ensemble Experiencesfor Non-Music MajorsAbstractDuring the fall semester of 2013, the Band and Orchestra Department and EngineeringEducation Department at a large Midwest university launched an academic learningcommunity to give all students enrolled in first-year engineering courses and in Band andOrchestra ensembles opportunities to obtain common academic experiences during theirfirst year, to form collegial relationships with their peers, and to bond academically andsocially via their passions for music. Data from the
Company/Organizational Structure BLS Research around the World Project Management Past/Future NASA Exploration Missions Group Interactions/Crew Dynamics Exercise Mission Scenarios for Exploration of Mars Proposal and Business Plan Writing The Moon and Mars How to Make a Good Presentation Robotics for Space Exploration Time Management Gravitational and Space Biology Leadership Styles Why Grow Plants in Space? Evolution of Food Systems for Space Food Nutrition and Processing for Space Waste Processing and Resource Recovery Systems Studies and Modeling Engineering Design BasicsThe proposal would have to support the design of
X X X needed to solve problem Reporting back to team X X X Digging deeper and solving X X X X X Presenting solution to X audience of experts Writing a report on X problem solution Table 3. Repetitive activities in the problem cycle Tool Activity Peer/Instructor Instructor Report/Presentation Co- Facilitators Evaluations Lectures Templates
majoring in agriculturalengineering or agricultural systems technology: the ABE learning community, which is createdby having students co-enroll for specially selected linked courses, and the ABE living learningcommunity, a reserved portion of a specific residence hall. Other features of the ABE learningcommunity include peer mentors and tutors, faculty-student dinners, and student service learningopportunities. The ABE Learning Community has been described in detail in previouslypublished papers.1, 2, 3We see the ABE Learning Community as key to helping us achieve the intended studentoutcomes of our programs. These outcomes were developed to meet the ABET Criteria 2000.ABET Criterion 3, Program Outcomes and Assessment, states, “Engineering
programs, mentoring, and research opportunities,while the least successful programs emphasized peer mentoring over other activities. Theprogram directors who saw the most increase in women’s degrees also talked of initiating aneven wider range of activities if they could, while directors with low-performing programsdiscussed continuing and expanding the same activities they were already carrying out. Thesefindings suggest that successful retention of women in engineering is aided by programs thatwork within the institutional context and provide a wide range of support and communityprograms for students9. Page 22.1607.4Although successful programs
objectives from Reference 4): Time on taskStudents devote an appropriate amount of time and effort to their studies. Time ManagementStudents keep up in their classes by scheduling their study time so as to operate under the principle that they master the material presented in each class meeting before the next class meeting. Interaction with peersStudents make effective use of their peers by frequent sharing of information and by regularly engaging in group study and collaborative learning. Interaction with facultyStudents interact regularly with their professors both in the classroom and outside of it, positively and with benefit
Perry scheme and require students to provide more documentationof the design process through methods such as journals.ABET stresses that engineering graduates should demonstrate an ability to communicateeffectively (ASEE Prism, 1997). Design projects typically involve written and oral reporting onthe project (Harris & Jacobs, 1995). These writing assignments exist not only to contribute to thedevelopment of communication skills, but also to simulate industry practice. Design projectsalso often involve teamwork. This teamwork helps students to improve their communicationsskills. The National Academy of Sciences (1995) asserts that graduates of engineering programsmust be prepared to work in a global economy. Teamwork highlights the fact that
class size fluctuates between 7 and 45 students, and thecourse is offered every spring semester. The iterations of the course were analyzed under a multi-casestudy to assess the effectiveness of the different approaches used for EDM courses.Data sourcesClass observation. Extensive data collection was made throughout the course. Every class of bothsemesters had at least one well-trained evaluator taking a class on the student interaction and dynamic ofthe class. Each class observation was documented in a memo, capturing general information such as dateand class topic and insights into class dynamics, student participation, and emerging themes recordedbased on CoP concepts. For example, write down instances where students demonstrated
. With theconclusion of the project, each team needs to deliver a working product. Members also need toassess their peers’ work through peer review.Each progress reports are 12% of the project grade adding up to 60% of the overall project grade.Final report, presentation, and successful demonstration are worth 30%. Peer review is theremaining 10% of the grade. 10% extra credit is added to the grade if teams choose to use CADin the design process or utilize additional means not mentioned within the objective section ofthis assignment sheet. Page 22.558.4Student teams conduct relevant fixed-goal laboratories and homework assignments to
evenask, “Why bother?”The BESTEAMS Program is creating training materials that will support faculty in teaching teamskills. Not only will improving team skills increase students’ marketability but is provides anopportunity to improve the engineering learning environment for all students. This is possiblebecause the project team in engineering is becoming a major vehicle for student social andlearning interactions. Social interaction with peers and the influence of positive engineering classexperiences are major factors contributing to the persistence of junior and senior women inengineering and science programs [Brai98]. We can assume the reverse, supported by researchand our own anecdotal observations, that poor socialization among engineering
, prepares students for industry by emphasizing working in teams,speaking and writing skills, and solving ill-defined problems [11].Furthermore, the photonics courses have home pages on the WWW, encourage the use of email,and require the use of technical professional software. Taken together, these changes provide anexcellent discovery-oriented environment to enhance student learning. More importantly, theseundergraduate laboratory courses with high design content stimulate interest in materials, lasers,and physics (areas with declining student populations and student interest).This learning environment has a number of advantages over using traditional lecture styleteaching for teaching photonics. Specifically, with experience-based learning (active