Conference Session

Faculty Development Division (FDD) Technical Session 10

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yi Wang; Fangyuan Chai; Yuan Liu; Jun Zhu; Jing Jin

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division (FDD)

, “SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models”, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, no.36, pp.717-731, 2004.[31] L. S. Aiken and S. G. West, Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, Inc,1991.[32] H. Song and M. Zhou, “STEM teachers’ preparation, teaching beliefs, and perceived teaching competence: A multigroup structural equation approach”, Journal of Science Education and Technology, no.30, pp.394-407, 2021.[33] I. DeCoito and P. Myszkal, “Connecting science instruction and teachers’ self- efficacy and beliefs in STEM education”, Journal of Science Teacher Education, vol.29, no.6, pp.485-503, 2018.[34] K. P. Goodpaster

Collection

2024 South East Section Meeting

Authors

Stephanie Laughton, The Citadel; Timothy A Wood, The Citadel

Inventories and Beyond,” CBE-Life Sci. Educ., vol. 9, pp. 1–5, 2010, doi: 10.1187/cbe.09.[42] S. Hood et al., “‘I like and prefer to work alone’: Social anxiety, academic self-efficacy, and students’ perceptions of active learning,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2021, doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-12-0271.[43] T. Araghi, C. A. Busch, and K. M. Cooper, “The Aspects of Active-Learning Science Courses That Exacerbate and Alleviate Depression in Undergraduates,” CBE Life Sci. Educ., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1–15, 2023, doi: 10.1187/cbe.22-10-0199.[44] E. A. Holt, C. Young, J. Keetch, S. Larsen, and B. Mollner, “The greatest learning return on your pedagogical investment: Alignment, assessment or in-class

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Technical Session 4: Engaging Authentic Engineering Practices

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azizi Penn, Purdue University; Rachel E. Higbee, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University; Siddika Selcen Guzey, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Morgan M Hynes, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Tamara J Moore, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE)

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)

, teachers reinforceautonomy, contribute to increased intrinsic motivation in their students, and positively affectstudent engagement and feelings of competence [17] [18]. Students with self-efficacy who knowthey have successfully solved problems in the past believe in themselves and are more likely tosucceed in future problem-solving opportunities [19]. The integrated STEM curricula developedfor middle school students for the current study aim to support student autonomy andcompetence needs by giving students structured opportunities to make choices and reflect upontheir decisions in an engineering design project [5]. By helping students feel independent andcompetent, we support students' intrinsic motivation. The curriculumdesigners' motivation

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 2 - Beliefs, Motivation, and Pedagogy

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deeksha Seth, Villanova University; Robert P. Loweth, Purdue University ; James C. O'Brien, Villanova University

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

and A. Kolmos, “Student conceptions of problem and project based learning in engineering education: A phenomenographic investigation,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 792–812, 2022.[15] E. M. Starkey, A. S. McKay, S. T. Hunter, and S. R. Miller, “Piecing together product dissection: how dissection conditions impact student conceptual understanding and cognitive load,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 140, no. 5, p. 052001, 2018.[16] E. M. Starkey, S. T. Hunter, and S. R. Miller, “Are creativity and self-efficacy at odds? an exploration in variations of product dissection in engineering education,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 141, no. 1, p. 012001, 2019.[17] C. A. Toh, S

Conference Session

ERM: Design!

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mohamed Jalal, University of Ottawa; Hanan Anis, University of Ottawa

learning environment (Cooper, Blattman,Hendrix, & Brownell, 2019). Three features of a learning environment contribute to students’development of project ownership: discovery, iteration and collaboration, with the last twofeatures being responsible for students’ development of emotional ownership of their projects(Corwin et al., 2018). A growing sense of project ownership helps students become more tolerantof obstacles and to persevere when facing challenges (Ryoo & Kekelis, 2018; Corwin, Graham,& Dolan, 2015) which in turn increases students’ self-efficacy and motivation (Corwin et al.,2015), encourage students to pursue a long-term career goals in science (D. I. Hanauer et al.,2012), and helps students achieve a better understanding

Conference Session

Best Papers in K-12 / Pre-college Division

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Towson University; Elizabeth Anne Parry, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

in the PreK-12 setting was acceleratedwith the release of A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Conceptand Core Ideas and the subsequent standards document, The Next Generation ScienceStandards.1,7,8 Engineering is still, however, a recent and complex challenge for teachers, Page 26.592.3particularly those at the elementary level, who often lack self confidence and self efficacy withregard to teaching engineering.1,2 Teachers’ self confidence in a subject is linked to both howthey perceive it and their knowledge of the subject itself.19 Elementary teachers receive little tono training in engineering in either pre

Conference Session

Research Methods and Studies on Engineering Education Research

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Javeed Kittur, Arizona State University; George K. Karway, Arizona State University; Mohammad Zaid Alrajhi, Arizona State University; King Saud University; Brian Carl Nelson, Arizona State University; Seungki Shin, Seoul National University of Education

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, K. L. (2015). Recommendations for Practice: Designing Curriculum for Gifted Students/Uygulamaya Yönelik Öneriler: Üstün Zekali Ögrenciler Için Müfredat Tasarimi. Türk Üstün Zeka Ve Eğitim Dergisi, 5(2), 157–166.36. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage publications.37. Kittur, J. (2020). Measuring the programming self-efficacy of Electrical and Electronics Engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Education, 63(3), 216-223.38. Kittur, J., & Brunhaver, S. (2020) Developing an Instrument to Measure Engineering

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eduardo Santillan-Jimenez, University of Kentucky; Julia E. Parker, University of Kentucky ; Keren Mabisi, University of Cincinnati; Carissa B. Schutzman, University of Cincinnati; Mark Crocker, University of Kentucky

Tagged Divisions

Graduate Studies

], conferences [10], and professional developmentprograms [14]), as well as the outcomes sought (e.g., work readiness and career self-efficacy [16,17], improved career motivation, adaptability, construction, and decision-making [9, 11, 13], aswell as professional growth, development, and/or identity [10, 12, 14]). A recent review by Jianget al. provides an excellent and comprehensive review of the literature on career exploration andsuggests a future research agenda [18]. Interestingly, the authors of this review identifiedinvestigating the real-time experiences of individuals engaging in career exploration as adesirable aspect of future research, which should also adopt a longitudinal design.Lynch et al. have previously described a Preparing Future

Conference Session

Global Community Engagement in Engineering Education

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aditya Johri, Virginia Tech; Akshay Sharma, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

participation showed significant positive effects on all 11 outcome measures: academicperformance (GPA, writing skills, critical thinking skills), values (commitment to activism andto promoting racial understanding), self-efficacy, leadership (leadership activities, self-ratedleadership ability, interpersonal skills), choice of a service career, and plans to participate inservice after college. The study further found that performing service as part of a course (servicelearning) significantly adds to the benefits associated with community service for all outcomesexcept interpersonal skills, self efficacy and leadership and benefits associated with course-basedservice were strongest for the academic outcomes, especially writing skills. Overall

Conference Session

Experiences of Underrepresented Students in Engineering

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University; Oenardi Lawanto, Utah State University; Sherry Marx, Utah State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

,especially in the transfer program, to be formative indicators of their success. Many participantsindicated that earning good grades in the transfer program increased their confidence andengineering self-efficacy. Persistence in a chosen engineering disciplinary major and re-enrollment on a semester-by-semester basis were other ways that participants assessed theirsuccess. All of these success measures have been previously reported in the engineeringeducation literature (Table 2).Table 2. Participant Success Measures Previously Reported in Engineering Education LiteratureSuccess Measure Participants Used as Success Measure in Engineering (# participants) Education LiteratureEarn engineering Skyler

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rui Li, New York University; Vikram Kapila, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Victoria Bill, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Jack Bringardner, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Ingrid Paredes, New York University Tandon School of Engineering

. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 2017. 1(1): p. 31-44.23. Okita, S.Y., The relative merits of transparency: Investigating situations that support the use of robotics in developing student learning adaptability across virtual and physical computing platforms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 2014. 45(5): p. 844-862.24. Stork, M.G., Supporting twenty-first century competencies using robots and digital storytelling. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 2020. 4(1): p. 43-50.25. Durak, H.Y., Yilmaz, F.G.K., and Yilmaz, R., Computational thinking, programming self-efficacy, problem solving and experiences in the programming process conducted with robotic activities. Contemporary Educational

Conference Session

CIT Division Technical Session #8

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mercy Jaiyeola; Sarah Lee, Mississippi State University; Allen Parrish

Institute (ABI), ComputingResearch Association (CRA-W), Center for Minorities and People with Disabilities inInformation Technology (CMD-IT), among others, have been established to increase therepresentation of women and minorities in computing studies and beyond, and they haverecorded success thus far25-26.Apart from the immediate results on academic performance, recruitment, persistence across thecomputing pipeline, self-efficacy, etc., what is the impact of these schemes on the eventualemployment outcome of the underrepresented minorities?Many BPC efforts in the existing literature have designed and deployed solutions aimed atremoving one or more barriers to representation, after which the impact (of the solution) on therepresentation of

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mathew Kuttolamadom, Texas A&M University; Michael Alexander Liu, Texas A&M University; Jyhwen Wang, Texas A&M University; Bruce L. Tai, Texas A&M University; Samuel F. Noynaert, Texas A&M University; Dinakar Sagapuram, Texas A & M University; Marian S. Kennedy, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

participant research self-efficacy. The findings from thesesurveys were collated and discussed. Based on these, certain program changes were suggested.Additionally, an internal evaluator, served to assess the effectiveness of VIP teams in terms ofproviding enriching research experiences, as well as resulting student inclination/intent to pursueadvanced STEM study. In this capacity, certain research questions were asked that sought toelucidate how the construction of the team affected its performance, how VIPs affect learningexperiences differently as compared to traditional single student projects, specific metric-basedeffectiveness queries, and how it could contribute to the students’ inclination to pursue advancedstudy and STEM careers; these were

Conference Session

Learning from Industry

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Trevion S. Henderson, University of Michigan

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

self-efficacy beliefs and outcome expectations, that go beyond the scope of thepresent study.27 Still, the analysis in this paper, which was designed to explore relationshipsbetween undergraduate co-curricular experiences and post-graduation retention, is useful in thatit provides some evidence for the efficacy of particular high impact practices for enhancingprofessional advancement in industry.Finally, the survey used in this study ascertained student involvement in particular practices, aswell as the length of time (i.e., in months) or degree of involvement (e.g., not involved,moderately involved, extremely involved). The survey did not ascertain information about thenature of student involvement. Simply put, not all HIPs are created

Conference Session

Design Thinking and Creativity

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Valentine, RMIT University; Iouri Belski, RMIT University; Margaret Hamilton, RMIT University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

fourth years, the creativethinking skills of engineering students significantly declined between first and fourth years ofstudy. Upon evaluating engineering students‟ perspectives of their problem solvingcapabilities, Steiner et. al. [12] found that students‟ confidence (self-efficacy) in their abilityto solve problems declined between first and fourth year of study. These outcomes suggestthat it cannot be conclusively stated whether engineering students‟ creativity skills improveover the period of studying a year degree, and is likely to depend on numerous contextualfactors.Creativity has been demonstrated to be highly domain-specific and that the creativity aperson demonstrates is not simply transferrable between domains [13]. This suggests

Conference Session

Electrical and Computer Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anthony A. Maciejewski, Colorado State University; Tom Chen, Colorado State University; Zinta S. Byrne, Colorado State University; Melissa D. Reese, Colorado State University; Branislav M. Notaros, Colorado State University; Ali Pezeshki, Colorado State University; Sourajeet Roy, Colorado State University; Andrea M. Leland, Colorado State University; Laura B. Sample McMeeking, Colorado State University; Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

, USA: The National Academy of Engineering, 2005.[29] E. Cady, N. L. Fortenberry, M. Drewery, and S. A. Bjorklund, "Validation of surveys measuring student engagement in engineering, Part 2," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Austin, TX, USA, 2009, pp. 14.1344.1-14.1344.20.[30] M. A. de Miranda, K. E. Rambo-Hernandez, and P. R. Hernandez, "Measuring Student Content Knowledge, iSTEM, Self-Efficacy, and Engagement through a Long-Term Engineering Design Intervention," in ASEE 123rd Ann. Conf., New Orleans, LA, USA, 2016, 10.18260/p.25694.[31] A. M. Pettigrew, R.W. Woodman, & K.S. Cameron, “Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research,” Academy Of Management Journal, 44(4), 697-713

Conference Session

Collaboration and Communication in Problem-based Learning

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mohsen M. Dorodchi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Nasrin Dehbozorgi, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Aileen Benedict, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Erfan Al-Hossami, University of North Carolina at Charlotte; Alexandria Benedict, University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

socialization [14]. He argued that learning occurs through interactions andcommunications with others, and further examined the impact of social environments in thelearning process. Consequently, he proposed that a learning environment needs to promote andmaximize collaboration, peer instruction, and social learning through discussion, collaboration,and feedback. Furthermore, Bandura proposed a social learning theory arguing that people canlearn new information and behaviors through socializing [26]. This theory guides educators torecognize how important it is to practice proper models of study skills and teamwork in theclassroom to construct self-efficacy of the learners.Social learning can be implemented in different ways, however, the main notion of

Conference Session

Research Informing Teaching Practice I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George D. Ricco, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Noah Salzman, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Russell Andrew Long, Purdue University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

level. Several studies in higher education have demonstrated the effect of faculty on studentachievement. Within the engineering context, Vogt (2008) found that faculty distance (definedas courses taught in a large lecture format with limited opportunities to interact directly with theprofessor) had a strong negative influence on self-efficacy, academic confidence, andGPA.6 These effects can be particularly pronounced among female students, who tend to report Page 25.1146.5greater numbers of negative interactions with professors and a corresponding loss of academicconfidence.32 Further evidence of the effect of a faculty member on

Conference Session

Community Engagement Division Poster Session

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Malinda S Zarske, University of Colorado, Boulder; Dana E Schnee, University of Colorado, Boulder; Angela R Bielefeldt, University of Colorado, Boulder; Derek T Reamon, University of Colorado, Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Community Engagement Division

; Truch, N. (2010). Assessing Self-Efficacy, Identity, Morality, and Motivation in a First-Year Materials Engineering Service Learning Course. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Louisville, KY.[11] Olsen, L., & Washabaugh, P. D. (2011). Initial Impact of a First-Year Design-Build-Test-Compete Course. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings. Vancouver, BC, Canada.[12] Sheppard SD, Gilmartin S, Chen HL, et al. Exploring the Engineering Student Experience: Findings from the Academic Pathways of People Learning Engineering Survey (APPLES). Engineering. 2010;(September).[13] Knight, D. W., Carlson, L. E., & Sullivan, J. F. (2003). Staying in Engineering: First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention. American Society of

Conference Session

ELOS Technical Session 5 - Remote, Virtual, and Digital Realities

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deborah Moyaki, University of Georgia; Isaac Damilare Dunmoye, University of Georgia; Cheryl T. Gomillion, University of Georgia; Dominik May, University of Wuppertal; Nathaniel Hunsu, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Experimentation and Laboratory-Oriented Studies Division (DELOS)

experimental platforms in chemistry laboratory education and its impact on experimental self-efficacy," INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, vol. 17, no. 1, 07/09/ 2020, doi: 10.1186/s41239-020-00204-3.[10] D. May, L. T. Smith, and C. Gomillion, "Student motivation in virtual laboratories in bioengineering courses," in 2022 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2022: IEEE, pp. 1-5.[11] C.-H. Huang, "Using PLS-SEM Model to Explore the Influencing Factors of Learning Satisfaction in Blended Learning," Education Sciences, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 249, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/5/249.[12] I. D. Dunmoye, D. Moyaki, A. V. Oje, N. J. Hunsu

Conference Session

Robotics

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

S.M. Mizanoor Rahman, New York University; Sonia Mary Chacko, New York University; Sheila Borges Rajguru, New York University; Vikram Kapila, New York University

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

computational thinkingin middle school through game programming [23]. Weese and Feldhausen proposed anothermethod to assess computational thinking of K-12 students based on self-efficacy in solvingproblems with microcontrollers and computer programming [24]. Yasar et al. investigated theessence of computational thinking and tools to promote it in K-12 education [25]. Mostimportantly, the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) have also recommendedincorporation of computational thinking in K-12 science education [20]. However, prior effortshave not considered exploration of computational thinking within the context of robotics-based K-12 STEM education.From the aforementioned literature review, below we discuss the details of two relevant articlesand

Conference Session

First-year Programs Division Technical Session 11: Curricular and Program Innovations

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elisabeth A. Chapman, Clarkson University; Elisabeth Maria Wultsch, Clarkson University; Jan DeWaters, Clarkson University; John C. Moosbrugger, Clarkson University; Peter R Turner, Clarkson University; Michael W. Ramsdell, Physics Dept. Clarkson University; Robert Prout Jaspersohn, Clarkson University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

motivating modern learners indicates that it is important to enable“the millennials” to overcome anxiety and believe that they can learn content and achieve theoutcomes; they must build self-efficacy and take responsibility for their own learning.According to Pryce, some of the best ways to motivate the millennial student are through guidedpractice, repeated and distributed practice, and early and frequent “low stakes formativeassessment with developmental feedback, as well as repeated and distributed practice built intothe course structure.”10 Thus, the development of appropriate class components and assessmentsis essential, especially for a course aimed at first-year students. The assessments must: 1) beperceived as both relevant and valuable to

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Technical Session 30

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julianne Latimer, Georgia Institute of Technology; Mary Lynn Realff, Georgia Institute of Technology; Clara Blue Templin, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jill Fennell, Georgia Institute of Technology; Christie Stewart, Georgia Institute of Technology; Lesley Baradel, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM)

classattendance) [26]. When looking to combine a strengths-based language with individualreflection, a conversation-based strengths-based intervention showed students had high regardsfor their strengths and had higher levels of optimism and self-efficacy throughout the course[27]. Collectively, these programs emphasize the role of strengths-based languages in fostering athriving atmosphere for undergraduate students.Research into CliftonStrengths is also increasing in popularity. Specifically, researchers approveof using a cohesive assessment tool to provide students with a consistent language to discusstheir strengths and other traits. CliftonStrengths has been proven reliable through its evidence ofconsistency over time, where individuals tend to

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Focused on Female Students

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary B. Isaac, HEDGE Co.

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Pre-College Engineering Education

interest in the fields of engineering and technology is an importantpart of the recruiting/engagement effort. Part of the “managing” includes administering surveysand developing appropriate program changes based on data. While data had been collected fromstudent attendees since the first event in 2010 using an instrument whose data had previouslybeen validated in a separate study [9], volunteer role model data were collected for the first timein 2014, specifically to begin examining their experiences in this social learning interaction.Study 1 used a Delphi study to develop the factor model and instrument to measure role modelengagement in the IIBI (and other) event interactions, resulting in a single-factor, five itemconstruct. Replicating data

Conference Session

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP) Technical Session 1

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Martha Cervantes, Johns Hopkins University ; Sydney Danielle Floryanzia, University of Washington and Johns Hopkins University; Jackie Sharp; William Roberts Gray-Roncal; Erik C. Johnson, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

College Industry Partnerships Division (CIP)

translatedto action as part of a written student development plan with next steps, major milestones, andcontinuous feedback.Program AssessmentWe strive to execute an agile, build-test-build paradigm, where we continually evaluate our trainingmethodology and systems for student support. We do this through qualitative and quantitativeassessments of workshops and training. Through surveys we analyze student engagement, researchoutputs, and self-assessment (e.g., imposter syndrome, self-efficacy, confidence, belonging) whichare indicators of the effectiveness of programs of this nature 7,11 . These surveys are administered atthe beginning, middle, and end of the program so that fellows can see their growth real-time.Finally, we track longitudinal student

Conference Session

PCEE Session 3: Robotics and Design Competitions

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anurag Purwar, Stony Brook University; Amanjeet Bagga, Stony Brook University; Cynthia Colón, Stony Brook University; Imin Kao, Stony Brook University

self-efficacy questions in the pre-camp survey and then repeated them inthe post-camp survey. The post-camp survey also asked them to reflect on their knowledge of thetopics before the camp. Students can judge their abilities only to the extent that they are exposedto a topic since they do not know the threshold for a learning outcome. Therefore, repeating thosequestions in the post-camp revealed some insights.Figure 7: (a) Choice of major pre-camp survey (N=24), (b) Choice of major post-camp survey(N=36) In the two surveys, students were asked to rate their skills on a scale of 1-10 in response to thefollowing four prompts: 1. How confident are you about designing, building, and programming robots? 2. How would you rate your circuits

Conference Session

Innovative Pedagogies Afforded Through Technology and Remote Learning

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Javeed Kittur, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Tahzinul Islam, York University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Undergraduate Students' Development of Computational and Programming Skills

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kelsey Scalaro, University of Nevada, Reno; Indira Chatterjee, University of Nevada, Reno; Ann-Marie Vollstedt, University of Nevada, Reno; Jeffrey C. LaCombe, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Cambridge University press, 1999.[29] K. J. Cross and M. C. Paretti, “African American males’ experiences on multiracial student teams in engineering,” 2020.[30] J. A. Leydens, B. M. Moskal, and M. J. Pavelich, “Qualitative methods used in the assessment of engineering education,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 65–72, 2004.[31] A. R. Carberry, H. S. Lee, and M. W. Ohland, “Measuring engineering design self- efficacy,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2010.[32] S. Elo and H. Kyngäs, “The qualitative content analysis process,” J. Adv. Nurs., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 107–115, Apr. 2008.[33] H. F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,” Qual. Health Res., vol

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mais Kayyali, Florida International University; Mohamed ElZomor, Florida International University; Piyush Pradhananga, Florida International University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Minorities in Engineering

employment may not provide them with the relevant experience employers arelooking for. The Office of International Student & Scholar Services at Florida InternationalUniversity reported a total of 2,738 international students, out of which 57% are at theundergraduate level. The lack of self-efficacy was also exhibited in some of the responses, as itseems students are afraid of the course load. One student explains: “I think the program is verychallenging and intimidating; I wanted to apply but I do not know if I have the ability to do it.”Another respondent describes that being that it is a STEM degree, students need to be well-disciplined to manage this heavier course load and thus suggesting that it is not for everyone.Others expressed “being

Conference Session

Key Educational & Professional Issues of Strategic Importance to the Civil Engineering Profession - and ASCE

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Allen C. Estes, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

awarenessand in some cases specialized training.The student-faculty and student-student relationships are important because a feeling ofbelonging has been shown to increase academic achievement and sustained success inschool18, 19. Students can focus their thoughts on their studies when they feel safe andwelcomed20. Marra et.al.21 identified lack of belonging as a primary reason that studentsleave engineering. Carter and Wilson22 found that interaction with faculty members is thesingle biggest factor in persistence with students of color. Vogt23 reported that academicintegration positively influenced self-efficacy, which affects effort and critical thinking.Svinicki and McKeachie24 contend that responding to the individual student may be thesingle