Conference Session

Empathy and Human-Centered Design 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nusaybah Abu-Mulaweh, Purdue University at West Lafayette; William C. Oakes, Purdue University at West Lafayette; Paul A. Leidig P.E., Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

inproximity and relationship. The paper will seek to answer one main guiding research questionand two sub-questions: 1. Does the proximity and relationship with the community partner affect the manifestation of empathy in students on service-learning design projects? a. How is empathy manifesting on service-learning projects? b. What factors contribute to the manifestation of empathy in students working on service-learning design projects?ContextThe EPICS program engages students in long-term partnerships with local, regional and globalcommunity partners [6]. Undergraduate students from all engineering disciplines and othermajors across the university earn academic credit within their respective plans of study

Conference Session

Ethical Reasoning and Decision Making

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rockwell Franklin Clancy III, University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Ethics

, however, and to conduct analyses and organize results, thefollowing analyses were planned and hypotheses posed:1. Explore potential differences in ESIT and MFQ responses based on gender, age, prior workexperience, political orientation, and religious affiliation, and MFQ differences based onprevious ethics education.2. Hypothesize that students with previous ethics education would receive higher P and N2scores on the ESIT, based on results from [1].3. Hypothesize that students in this sample would receive lower P and N2 scores on the ESITthan those in [1], since the participants in this sample were non-native-English-speakingstudents.4. Hypothesize that students in this study would receive higher N2 scores after completing a one-semester-long

Conference Session

Construction Engineering Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

David Wesley Martin, Central Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Architectural Engineering, Construction Engineering

Paper ID #28604Evaluating the Evolution of Construction Management Students’ ConflictManagement Styles as a Result of Andragogical MethodsDr. David Wesley Martin, Central Washington University Certified Professional Constructor with twelve years professional experience in civil and construction project management encompassing over $400,000,000 worth of vertical and horizontal construction. An additional fifteen years involved in college level construction management instruction and administration including contract and project management techniques, estimating, disputes resolution practices, planning and scheduling, safety

Conference Session

Perceptions, Projects, and Practical Approaches

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Secil Akinci-Ceylan, Iowa State University; Kristen Sara Cetin P.E., Michigan State University; Benjamin Ahn, Iowa State University of Science and Technology; Bora Cetin, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

consulting firms. Two students indicated thatsolving ill-structured problems during an internship made them feel comfortable solving ill-structured problems. Two students indicated their internship(s) helped them to pre-plan theirsolution, stated by one of the seniors: “I think that's helped me take a step back and look at it alittle more closely before I just jump right into it.” One student also stated their internship helpedthem to use outside resources as in the following example: “… and I realized how many differentsolutions and how easy it is to call a representative and especially how easy it is to call otherpeople and be like, "What have you used and what products would you recommend?" So, that'sprobably what I would have done on this.” It

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 5: Online Teaching and Learning

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Joe Michael Allen, University of California, Riverside; Frank Vahid, University of California, Riverside

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

a lot about what it takes to make anonline course successful. Among key lessons learned were that required synchronous onlinemeetings help keep students engaged and on track, an online chat forum (especially with a TApresent) enables a level of student engagement usually not found in in-person classes, and qualityonline interactive content is highly effective (more so than videos). Readers interested in a shortdemo video of how we run our online course can refer to [17] (full video [18]). In the pastseveral years, we have assisted several other universities to create new online courses modeledafter our course, in some cases simply cloning our entire course for an instructor to step into andteach at their school. We plan to continually

Conference Session

Approaches to Assessment and Student Reflection

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenya Mejia, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Wendy Roldan, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

activity. In future work, we plan ondeploying our survey to institutions with a broad range of student population, departments withvarying engineering and design cultures, and professors with different approaches to the designof reflection activities. ConclusionThrough this survey development process, we have been able to identify four complications thatarise when trying to understand student reactions to reflection. Through understanding studentexperiences, we can find ways to improve reflection activities and at the same time empathizewith students as we learn how properties of reflection can cause diversity of reactions fromstudents. Understanding student reactions to reflection is a promising route

Conference Session

Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kaylee A Dunnigan, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering; Amy Dunford, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Jack Bringardner, NYU’s Tandon School of Engineering

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

, novelty, and quality in order to evaluate thestudent’s level of design ideation expertise.BackgroundThe phases of engineering design are often taught as having a circular, iterative nature. Anengineering product or process is designed through phases of (i) defining the problem, (ii)brainstorming solutions, (iii) planning a solution, (iv) prototyping, (v) evaluating the solution, andfinally (vi) reflecting for iteration, shown in Figure 1. Figure 1: Simple infographic conveying six phases of engineering design iteratively.In practice, the activities associated with each engineering design phase are highly interdependentand do not simply progress in a neat iterative circle, as implied by common infographics for theengineering design process

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Technical Session 3: Diversity in Mathematics Education

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Lee Singleton, Whatcom Community College; Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College; Todd Haskell, Western Washington University

Tagged Divisions

Mathematics

time frame allotted each day was a challenge, with activitiesusually taking longer than planned. As the activities are refined, the time estimates for eachactivity are becoming more accurate, and tend to fit well into the 50 minute time periods. Forlonger class sessions, multiple activities could be used together.Time always seems to be a big factor when deciding whether or not to try an intervention. Thesame amount of time was spent on each topic for classes using models vs. non-models since eachcourse went through similar activity sheets. Active learning can take a little more time than justlectures. For example, four days were spent on volumes of revolution using activity sheets (withmodels or electronic visuals), versus three days

Conference Session

Materials Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Grace M. Lu, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Dallas R. Trinkle , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Andre Schleife, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Cecilia Leal, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jessica Krogstad, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Robert Maass, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Pascal Bellon, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Pinshane Y. Huang, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nicola H. Perry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Matthew West, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Timothy Bretl, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Geoffrey L. Herman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Materials

= 7.8 ∗ 10−3 ). The increase between 2018 and 2019 may haveoccurred due to the new inclusion of freshmen in the survey. The freshmen have only beenexposed to one module in MSE 182 rather than the two in MSE 201, which had previously beenthe first course with integrated computational tools in the MSE curriculum. We conclude thatexposure to the computational modules is fulfilling students’ desire for more computation in theirMSE classes, but that more modules are still desired. We are exploring whether modules can beadded to more MSE classes and plan to expand the number of modules in MSE 182 and MSE422, which currently only have one.6 ConclusionSince the survey of employers of MSE students by Thornton et. al. 1 , our department hasintegrated

Conference Session

Faculty Development Research

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Fethiye Ozis P.E., Northern Arizona University; Kyle Nathan Winfree, Northern Arizona University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

undergraduate respondents, the largest portion (26.3%)were from Environmental Engineering Program. Also, our college is unique to have AppliedSciences combined with Engineering, we had 3.5% of the respondents from Physics.7. Future WorkWe plan to continue with additional surveys, and seek responses from broader student body todetermine and rank the behaviors establishing rapport in engineering classrooms. In addition, ourgoal is to further develop the blended faculty professional development and educate our facultyon the behaviors that establish rapport. To understand the real impact on students, we willcontinue to study the instructor behavior, and student feedback correlating the impact of rapporton student resilience and retention in a longitudinal

Conference Session

Busting a Career Move? When and Why or Why Not?

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Adrienne R. Minerick, Michigan Technological University; Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Cindy Waters, Naval Surface Warfare Center; Beena Sukumaran, Rowan University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

. She is Chair of the ASEE Long-Range Planning Committee and a member of the Engineering Deans Council as co-chair of the EDC Undergraduate Experience Committee. She is also a member of the Executive Committee for the Global Engineering Deans Council. Carpenter is a past Vice President of Professional Interest Councils for ASEE and past President of WEPAN. Currently she chairs a Pilot Program Ad-Hoc Committee for the Gulf Scholars Program for the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine. She is an ASEE PEV for General Engineering, Dr. Carpenter regularly speaks at the national level on issues related to the success of women in engineering and innovative STEM curricula.Dr. Cindy Waters, Naval Surface

Conference Session

Student Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Karina Sylvia Sobieraj, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Student

because my advisor can be pretty critical too. There's a lot of times where you don't necessarily feel built up or whatever.” (Kelly)Negative Mentorship A relationship between a “She was not planning to student and his or her have an undergraduate superior that has impacted student come work under her, student in an unfavorable so she just like wasn’t very

Conference Session

First-Year Programs: Major Choice

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brian J. Smith, University of Notre Dame; Elizabeth Kerr, University of Notre Dame

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

classes and/or careers. Similar frustrations were expressed withregards to the engineering career fair (which occurs near the beginning of each Fall semester).While the engineering career fair was not a tracked CE/EVEG exploration event (see Table 1),students in each general classification (but particularly lost EVEG students) reported negativeexperiences in terms of available employers, providing valuable insight and supporting thenotation that post-graduation plans strongly influence major selection. Among the eventsdiscussed within the discernment papers, the student panel discussion appeared to be the mostsuccessful, due to the relatively high student participation (42 total experiences) and overallpositive impact across all student major

Conference Session

Educational Interventions and Pedagogy in Biomedical Engineering - June 22nd

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Eileen Haase, Johns Hopkins University; Harry R. Goldberg, Johns Hopkins University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical Engineering

demonstrate that overallknowledge is not diminished when peer instruction is the primary form of learning.IntroductionThe authors, along with many other engineering educators, have been strong proponents ofactive learning. Active, collaborative, cooperative, and problem‐based learning have beendemonstrated repeatedly to be more effective than lecture alone [2]. Students are 1.5 times lesslikely to fail in courses that use active learning [3]. When one of the authors was granted aFulbright Scholar Award to teach a biochemistry course in Uganda, the plan was to reproduceteaching methods used in the United States such as clicker questions, think-pair-share, and teamactivities which would be easy for the students to adopt [4]. However, within the first

Conference Session

Student Motivation, Identity, and Resilience

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Saira Anwar, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Muhsin Menekse, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Ahmed Ashraf Butt, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Educ. Res., vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 287–298, 2004.[7] S.-M. R. Ting and R. Man, "Predicting academic success of first-year engineering students from standardized test scores and psychosocial variables," Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 75–80, 2001.[8] J. C. F. De Winter and D. Dodou, "Predicting academic performance in engineering using high school exam scores," Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 27, no. 6, p. 1343, 2011.[9] B. D. Jones, M. C. Paretti, S. F. Hein, and T. W. Knott, "An analysis of motivation constructs with first‐year engineering students: Relationships among expectancies, values, achievement, and career plans," J. Eng. Educ., vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 319–336, 2010.[10] R. Steinmayr, A. F. Weidinger, M

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods Division (ERM) Best Paper Finalists

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Andrew Forney, Loyola Marymount University; Sunai Kim, Loyola Marymount University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Baccalaureate,” Soc. Sci. Q., vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1169–1190, 2011.[17] S. L. Morgan, D. Gelbgiser, and K. A. Weeden, “Feeding the pipeline: Gender, occupational plans, and college major selection,” Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 989– 1005, 2013.[18] J. Price, “The effect of instructor race and gender on student persistence in STEM fields,” Econ. Educ. Rev., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 901–910, 2010.[19] J. D. Speer, “The gender gap in college major: Revisiting the role of pre-college factors,” Labour Econ., vol. 44, no. December 2016, pp. 69–88, 2017.[20] L. Russell, “Can learning communities boost success of women and minorities in STEM? Evidence from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,” Econ. Educ. Rev

Conference Session

NSF Grantees: First Year Programming (1)

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Brett Tallman P.E., Montana State University; Tessa Sybesma, Montana State University; William J. Schell IV P.E., Montana State University; Bryce E. Hughes, Montana State University; Monika Kwapisz, Montana State University; Emma Annand, Montana State University; Shannon Ranch, Montana State University

Tagged Topics

NSF Grantees Poster Session

licensed Professional Engineer. He has also taught high school and attended seminary. You can find more of his engineering education work at educadia.org or on his YouTube channel.Miss Tessa Sybesma, Montana State University Tessa is in her fourth year of study at Montana State University and has participated with a campus re- search team for the last year. She is currently enrolled in Industrial and Management Systems Engineering and has interests in facilities planning, change management, and project management. She also finds ed- ucation, human development, and peer support to be motivating topics. While at MSU Tessa has been involved with CRU, a campus ministry, and is currently vice president of Alpha Pi Mu, an

Conference Session

Engineering Physics and Physics Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Genaro Zavala, Tecnologico de Monterrey and Universidad Andres Bello; Angeles Dominguez, Tecnologico de Monterrey and Universidad Andres Bello

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Physics and Physics

/24772[5] G. Zavala and A. Dominguez, “Engineering students’ perception of relevance of physics and mathematics,” in 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, pp. 26664.1 – 26664.20, 2016. https://peer.asee.org/26664[6] J. W. Creswell, Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 4th ed., Boston: Pearson, 2011.[7] A. Field, Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, 5th ed., Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2017.[8] OECD, Science Competencies for Tomorrow's World: Volume 1: Analysis, OECD, 2007. Available in https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264040014-en

Conference Session

Design Across Curriculum 1

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Robert P. Loweth, University of Michigan; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Jiangqiong Liu; Kathleen H. Sienko, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

statements that do not align with true stakeholder needs.Furthermore, other studies have shown that engineering students may struggle to collect andanalyze qualitative stakeholder data as part of their problem identification and definitionprocesses [10], [13], [19]. These data collection and analysis challenges are partially related tostudent difficulties encountered while planning information gathering interactions withstakeholders [10], [13], finding and accessing stakeholders who can best provide neededinformation [10], [13], and translating conflicting or ambiguous stakeholder responses intospecific needs and/or requirements [10], [18], [19]. Problem identification and definitionprocesses also generate large amounts of qualitative data that

Collection

2019 ASEE Zone I Conference & Workshop

Authors

Wei Xie; Jared Auclair; Jinxiang Pei

Methodology and Technology InnovationsDriven by the challenges and industry needs, we are developing new methodologies (i.e., big dataanalytics, risk analysis, DoE and AI) for end-to-end biomanufacturing risk management and real-time production process control, which can facilitate QbD, PAT, continuous and flexiblemanufacturing. Operations research (OR) typically focuses on finding the optimal design,planning and operational decisions for complex stochastic systems, such as integratedbiopharmaceutical manufacturing system. The OR methodology development forbiopharmaceutical supply chain is still in its infancy [7].State-of-the-art OR analytical models and methodologies for biopharmaceutical operations andsupply chain management have several key

Collection

2016 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Ryan Milcarek; Michael Garrett; Ryan Falkenstein-Smith; Jeongmin Ahn

papers discussing resilience in civil engineeringfor civil infrastructure resilience to earthquakes.18,19 Besides the literature, world organizations are calling for resilience engineering. Forinstance, the call for resiliency in cities, building and technologies is on the rise. The UnitedNations Office of Disaster Risk Reduction has issued the ‘Making Cities Resilient’ report, whichcalls for more careful planning of cities and the inclusion of the most vulnerable individuals withincities in order to improve the ability of the city to recover from disaster.20 While much of the focusin developmental studies has been placed on collaboration, strategy and strong governance, therehas also been mention of technological innovations that will

Collection

2020 St.Lawrence Section Meeting

Authors

Kathryn Dimiduk; Orlay Santa; Hadas Ritz; Lesa Carter

component ofimproving the general level of teaching effectiveness across the college.Introduction and motivationAs a teaching center, MTEI’s goal is to assist all faculty in improving their courses and teachingskills. For faculty at the beginning of their teaching careers, we provide information, support andfeedback for a strong start in teaching so they build confidence and identity as goodteachers. For highly skilled teachers, MTEI offers assistance with planning and assessment ofnew approaches, or technology, or learning activities they created. Both of these groups offaculty are highly motivated and seek out and welcome assistance. For teachers needingsignificant and more specialized support, their departments frequently encourage them to

Conference Session

Computers in Education Division Technical Session 5: Online Teaching and Learning

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kenneth Reid, Virginia Tech; Max Mikel-Stites, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Computers in Education

,process, or system. 1. Develop a plan of study for your undergraduate career 2. Articulate holistic issues that impact engineering solutions 3. Solve problems using systematic engineering approaches and tools 4. Model an engineering system 5. Synthesize information from several sources 6. Communicate information effectively 7. Contribute effectively to an engineering teamThe second course is a project-based course. Student teams are formed, and each section has a specifiedproject. Student teams progress through an engineering design process to design and prototype a deviceaccording to their section. Foundations of Engineering (2) (ENGE 1216) course objectives are as follows:Foundations of Engineering (2): As a

Conference Session

Research! Research! Research! in Faculty Development

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Ariana C. Vasquez, Colorado School of Mines; Amy Hermundstad Nave, Colorado School of Mines; Sam Spiegel, Colorado School of Mines

Tagged Divisions

Faculty Development Division

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators 1: Learning Aids

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mariana Silva, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Eric G. Shaffer, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Nicolas Nytko, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Jennifer R. Amos, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

trained model performs better thanthe other two methods.For this study, the recall parameter is the most useful since we want to identify the students atrisk that could benefit from the course intervention. Our model gives a 57% recall, which isunfortunately not high, but is better than selecting students at random. The instructor plans tocontinue gathering data to improve the classification model.To answer the second research question (can we improve the student experience and performancein the course via an intervention based on early predictions?), we analyzed assessment scoresfrom students in each of the four groups A, B, C and D.Student final grades 125 100

Conference Session

Design in Engineering Eduaction - Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kevin Dahm, Rowan University; William Riddell, Rowan University; Roberta Harvey, Rowan University; Paris von Lockette, Rowan University; Eric Constans, Rowan University; Jennifer Courtney, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Page 12.1400.7The new course structure for fall 2005 incorporated a slightly modified version of the Hoistinatorproject, but this time it was preceded by a simpler 4-week startup project on building rockets outof 2-liter soda bottles. Bottles were modified by the addition of wings, etc., partially filled withwater, and then pressurized and launched. Schools throughout the country are using variousversions of soda bottle rocket projects in science education12,13 and NASA has proposedstandards and lesson plans for grade 5-12 students.14 Specifications and constraints for thisproject were as follows: The goal was to build a rocket that would fly as far as possible, but distance was measured perpendicular to the plane of the launcher

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Farhad Azadivar, University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth; Bradley Kramer, Kansas State University

Ince sion o x Publications f TaFigure 1. Overlap between university activities and economic development agencies actionsTo be sure, the results of center activities can have a significant economic impact. However,each project is intended to directly benefit an individual client in a manner that “scratches theiritch.” There is no grand plan for developing a local, regional, or state-wide economy. Theobjective is to help the client and to enhance the education of the engineering student whiledoing so.Myth #4: Industry trusts Universities

Conference Session

Technology Literacy for Engineering Students

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Camille George, University of St. Thomas; Elise Amel, University of Saint Thomas; Christopher Greene, University of Saint Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Technological Literacy Constituent Committee

interested in how gender affects career choice. She believes strongly in the scientist-practitioner model, using her academic background to solve practical problems and using her problem solving experiences to enhance her teaching. She has received an award for excellence in service learning. Professor Amel has specific expertise developing assessment plans and dissemination approaches through her work on the UST Bush Foundation Grant. She has completed pedagogical presentations and publications about international education and service learning.Christopher Greene, University of Saint Thomas Dr. Chris Greene comes to the University of St. Thomas following a 20+ year career in industry

Conference Session

How to Effectively Teach Using Teams

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Riddell, Rowan University; Eric Constans, Rowan University; Kevin Dahm, Rowan University; Jennifer Courtney, Rowan University; Roberta Harvey, Rowan University; Peter Mark Jansson, Rowan University; Paris von Lockette, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Civil Engineering

bottle rocket project. In the bottle rocket project,students use 0.25 inch thick foam board, duct tape, a 2 liter soda bottle, modeling clay Page 12.1290.6and water to design rockets that can be launched from a nozzle by using pressurized air.This concept has been used at other universities to teach core engineering principles22,and NASA has proposed standards and lesson plans to use for grade 5-12 students23. Therocket project was originally run at Rowan as a one-lab period ice-breaker, which was notincluded in the students’ grades. However, in 2005 this was expanded to a four-weekproject as part of the changes in SEC I. In the current incarnation

Conference Session

Technology Integration in the Classroom for Manufacturing I

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yongjin Kwon, Drexel University; Shreepud Rauniar, Drexel University; Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Horacio Sosa, Drexel University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing

. 419 – 427, 2005. 3. Goldin, D., Venneri, S. and Noor, A., “New Frontiers in Engineering,” Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 63-69, 1998. 4. Goldin, D., Venneri, S. and Noor, A., “Ready For the Future?” Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 11, pp. 61-70, 1999. 5. Kwon, Y., Wu, T. and Ochoa, J., “SMWA: A CAD-based decision support system for the efficient design of welding,” Journal of Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 295-304, 2004. 6. Kwon, Y. and Fischer, G., The University of Iowa, College of Engineering Equipment Fund, “Three-Year Vision Plan for Undergraduate Instructional Laboratories: Simulation-Based, Reconfigurable Integrated Lean