Assistant Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Sate University. She received her M.S. in Counselor Education, Student Affairs Administration from Radford University and M.S. in Career and Technical Education and B.S. in Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise both from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and Sate University. Page 11.887.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Lessons Learned: Implementing a Large-Scale Peer Mentoring ProgramAbstractBeginning in 1992 with the creation of the
, W., Watford, B. (2009). Implementing a Peer Led Model in a Large Scale PeerMentoring Program.[5] Watford, B., Clater, C., Kampe, J., Edmister, W. (2006). Lessons Learned: Implementing aLarge-Scale Peer Mentoring Program. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the AmericanSociety for Engineering Education. Retreived 25 September fromhttp://soa.asee.org/paper/conference/paper-view.cfm?id=2138. Page 15.528.9
to prepare and load materials by the administrative staff, and occasionalproblems with the server or computer equipment. Overall, the online environment provides theFreshman Programs with a means to keep a large-scale program organized and to achieve itsgoals.This paper will describe the key features used by the instructional team and by the students, withan analysis of the lessons learned for implementing, maintaining, and improving an onlineenvironment that supports a large-scale and dynamic program. Page 7.1171.1 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition
Paper ID #27366Facilitating a Student-Led, Large-Scale Engineering Bridge Camp: TwelveYears of Tips from the TrenchesAdrienne Steele, Louisiana State University Adrienne Steele has 20 years experience in STEM education. Currently, Adrienne works at Louisiana State University as the Assistant Director of Student Programs and Outreach in the Chevron Center for Engineering Education. Her current responsibilities include managing a large peer mentoring program, fa- cilitating all aspects of a first year student bridge camp, assisting faculty members with outreach activities and grant proposals, and working with other
-12 Ohio teaching license in Mathematics. Currently, she is working on completing her Masters in Data Analytics and Applied Statistics and her PhD in En- gineering Education surrounding digital barriers and technological learning aids for cognitively disabled engineering students.Kaitlin Fair, Georgia Institute of Technology c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Lessons Learned: Strategies for Creating and Mentoring Diverse Graduate Student CommunitiesIntroductionAs both professional societies and university campuses take more active measures to promotediversity awareness and competency, graduate student inclusion is often a secondary focus afterundergraduate
comprehension and retention [34, 42, 58, 59]. Even simple strategies, such asend-of-class “minute papers” that ask students to reflect on what they learned in class and whatremains unclear can provide opportunities for students to organize their understanding [60]. Thisapproach is effective regardless of instructor level of experience and across levels of studentability [61]. The reflective process can be effectively integrated into a peer review process [52,54].Identity as writing engineersAs seniors in a chemical engineering degree program, the students in our study have begun toform engineering identities. The structure of our program—as is typical of many—in whichstudents take technical writing early in their degree programs in the English
Implementing Peer tutoring in an online course Colin Neill, Joanna DeFranco, Amanda Neill The Pennsylvania State UniversityPrevious research in a large scale experiment provided no evidence that working on a successfuland effective team had a positive effect on individual student performance. Thus, to facilitateindividual learning, we implemented peer tutoring while students worked on an effective team inan online graduate software engineering course. This paper presents an online peer tutoringdesign. The results of a constant comparative qualitative analysis will be presented in order toprovide insight into the success of this peer tutoring implementation.I
State University Ernesto Cuesta is a PhD student in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) in Blacksburg, VA. He holds a B.Sc. in Telecommunications Engineering and an M.S. in Project Management. Before beginning his doctoral studies, he spent eight years in the telecommunications industry, leading data-center swaps and managing large-scale network deployments. As a Graduate Teaching Assistant, he supports Virginia Tech’s interdisciplinary IDPro course, mentoring students through project-based learning and facilitating teamwork across engineering disciplines. His research interests center on student motivation in experiential learning environments
. Page 14.668.2NCETE Teacher Professional Development Positioning of the teacher as developer of lessons facilitates coherence with otherlearning activities occurring in each teacher’s classroom. Specifically, teachers can situate theengineering design concepts into their curriculum by crafting a lesson rather than attempting tofit a pre-packaged generic lesson into an existing and, perhaps, rigidly structured curriculum.The lesson development opportunities provide teachers with an active learning experience,wherein they first experience exemplary engineering design challenges as participants and thencreate design challenges. Formative feedback was provided by peer teachers and professionaldevelopers as the teachers developed the lessons
, and J. Kampe, “Lessons learned: Implementing a large- scale peer mentoring program,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Chicago, IL, June 2006.9. E. Hart, A. Mott, and S. Furterer, “Piloting an undergraduate engineering mentoring program to enhance gender diversity,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Virtual, June 2020.10. V. Washington and J. Mondisa, “A need for engagement opportunities and connections: understanding the social community outcomes of engineering undergraduates in a mentoring program,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 110, pp. 902-924, May 2021.11. M. McCullough et al., “ENGAGE 2Be Engineers mentoring program for minority students,” in Proceedings, ASEE Annual
accomplished in the past year and what I wanted to accomplish in thenext three years. Only occasionally did I meet with my department chairs over the years todiscuss my career, however. I also started my faculty career before the implementation of aformal faculty mentoring system, and did not have the friendly advice of a trusted colleague toguide me, nor did I actively seek out such advice.I was in a quandary: according to the plan—never articulated in the academy, but generallyunderstood by all—everything was fine. Like Balboa upon finding the Pacific Ocean, rather thanjoy, I was professionally void. While large-scale research was fun and rewarding, I found that itlacked a certain satisfaction. Perhaps it was that as projects get bigger, one moves
post assessments within group, with a p-value of.05. A two-sample t-test assuming unequal variance was used to compare the two groups.Open ended survey questions were analyzed by performing a content analysis. Each responsewas entered into a computer software, then codes were assigned to the response inductively. Theinitial codes were later condensed into fewer codes based on program learning outcomes. Directquotations of responses that are provided in this document are verbatim to illustrate the responsesby theme.Class activitiesA one credit class was used to provide interaction between the students, time for assignments anddeliver course content. The first day, the faculty mentor gave an overview of the classexpectations and peer mentoring
interface through molecular dynamics.Naser Haghbin, Fairfield University Dr. Naser Haghbin is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Innovation Annex at Fairfield Univer- sity’s School of Engineering and Computing. With a distinguished career in Mechanical Engineering, he focuses on advancing industrial automation, robotics, and smart manufacturing. Driven by an inter- disciplinary approach, he seamlessly integrates traditional and advanced manufacturing processes with CNC machining, contributing significantly to academia and industry. Moreover, he excels in operating two fully automated robotic paint shops, showcasing his expertise in manufacturing processes, practical automation, and robotics in large-scale
benefits and challenges of working with astatewide program for underrepresented minorities in a state with a low population of minoritystudents and with differing institutional characteristics across campuses. Such benefits andchallenges will be analyzed within the context of a strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, andthreats (SWOT) analysis1. Initially, the LSAMP Indiana program goals will be provided.Drawing upon evaluation reports, the authors will then present the SWOT analysis of theLSAMP Indiana program. Finally, lessons learned from conducting a large-scale diversityinitiative and transferable ways to engage the next generation of underrepresented students inSTEM educational and professional development activities will be identified.Program
of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Iowa State University. He is currently the director the Iowa State University Information Assurance Cen- ter, which has been recognized by the National Security Agency as a charter Center of Academic Excel- lence for Information Assurance Education. He teaches network security and information warfare and has written a textbook on network security. For a non-technical audience he co-authored a book on security literacy and has given numerous talks on security. His current funded research is targeted at developing robust countermeasures for network-based security exploits and large scale attack simulation environ- ments and is the director of the Internet-Scale Event and
in the same residence hall community, it is hoped that an academicallysupportive peer group will enhance the overall experience.Such integration does not come easily. A coordinated plan has been developed to join the Page 14.749.3Cornerstone Experience and the Residential Experience to address the challenges encountered bythe development and implementation teams. These issues include facility location andcomposition including design and construction, gender balancing in a residence hall withpredominantly engineering degree program students, segregating engineering students or mixingwith other majors on single residence hall floors, development
need, meanwhile drawing upon the insights of non-engineeringclassmates to weigh technology against culture, cost, educational capabilities and operationalrequirements.Throughout the process, students are required to reflect on the process as well as on theirsuccesses and struggles. Comments from students over the three years of the course are used tohighlight specific learning outcomes. ● “Perhaps my view was too idealistic at the start of the course, but I am now at least aware that despite the best of intentions, many factors have to be well thought out before a large-scale project can help those in need sustainably. Furthermore, I am now aware of practical ways to account for the needs of project beneficiaries and ensure these
Minority Undergraduates: A Longitudinal Study of Program Outcomes 1986-1996. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 2000: p. 114-119.2. Morley, R., J. Havick, and G. May, An Evaluation of the Georgia Tech Summer Undergraduate Program of Research in Electrical Engineering for Minorities. Journal of Engineering Education, 1998. 87(3): p. 321-325.3. Good, J., G. Halpin, and G. Halpin, A Promising Prospect for Minority Retention: Students Becoming Peer Mentors. The Journal of Negro Education, 2000. 69(4): p. 375-383.4. May, G., Advising and Mentoring. 2006, Georgia Institute of Technology: Atlanta.5. Watford, B., et al. Lessons Learned: Implementing a Large-Scale Peer Mentoring Program. in
serviceprovider.Student learning was assessed using formal and informal methods. Informal assessmentsconsisted of whiteboard presentations, open-ended questioning, demonstrations, journal write-ups, and teacher observations. These were used to guide daily activities and lessons. Formalassessments consisted of pre and post assessments. Subject produced drawings were used toelicit students’ pre- and post-program knowledge. Draw a Robot and Draw an Engineerassessments were used. A survey instrument was developed and implemented to elicit tinkeringand technical self-efficacy. An earlier developed instrument that was validated using a sample ofresponses of 200 engineers to develop the items was modified for use with youth. Observationsof project activities by
theNGSS [34]. The urgent need for large-scale teacher PD to support schools for effective adoptionof NGSS has been highlighted recently [35]. Unfortunately, as reported in a study of NGSS-focused PD [31], participating teachers experienced significant challenges in aligning lessons tothe NGSS because of (1) limited time, materials, and curricular resources and lack of continuedsupport and (2) lack of assessments to support teacher transition away from the old sciencestandards. According to [31], incorporating the NGSS in classroom teaching and learning wasadditionally challenging because new NGSS-aligned assessments were not adopted by the schooldistricts, resulting in a mismatch between classroom instruction vs. the student learning outcomes.For
Abstract 1299 Establishing an Integrated Mathematics, Engineering, and Science Curriculum: Lessons Learned James D. Nelson, Bernd Schröder College of Engineering and Science Louisiana Tech University Ruston, LA 71272AbstractThis paper presents successes, failures, and lessons learned from implementing a fully integratedmathematics, science, and engineering curriculum at the freshman and sophomore level. In theacademic year 2000-2001 the program is in its second year of full
Paper ID #41324Professional Skills to Support Interdisciplinary Work: Lessons Learned froma Successful Collaboration between Universities, Training Programs, and ProfessionalSocietiesDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Assistant Dean for Graduate Student Services at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published dozens of peer-reviewed works
Annual Conference and Exposition, 2001. 8. Mary R. Anderson-Rowland, Dana C. Newell, “Lessons learned in a successful underrepresented minority retention program,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2005. 9. Bevlee Watford, Carrie Slater, Jean Kampe, Whitney Edmister, “Lessons learned: Implementing large-scale peer mentoring program,” American Society for Engineering Education, 2006. 10. Kelly Crittenden, James Nelson, Galen Turner, “Increasing student success in Engineering and Science through a freshman enrichment program,” American Society of Engineering Education, 2008. 11. Arturo Fuentes, Stephen Crown, Robert Freeman, Horacio Vasquez, Cristina
–288, 2011[3] C. Kuhn and Z. Castaño, “Boosting the career development of postdocs with a peer-to- peer mentor circles program,” Nat Biotechnol, 12;34(7):781-3, Jul 2016.[4] M. Broberg, B. Bose, R. Pineda-Mendez, D. Devine, R. Gehr, C. G. Jange, J. McDermott, M. Loui, and J. Eisma, “Lessons learned - preparing graduate students and postdoctoral researchers for tenure track careers through mentoring circles,” Paper presented at the 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 26-29, 2022. 10.18260/1-2—40662. Available: https://peer.asee.org/40662.[5] R. A. Layton, M. L. Loughry, M. W. Ohland, and G.D. Ricco. (2010). Design and validation of a web-based system for assigning
Paper ID #30640Highlights and Lessons Learned from a Partially Flipped CivilEngineering Classroom StudyDr. Kimberly Warren, UNC Charlotte Dr. Kimberly Warren is an Associate Professor at UNC Charlotte who specializes in the field of Geotech- nical Engineering, a discipline of Civil Engineering. She holds her Civil Engineering degrees from Vir- ginia Tech and North Carolina State University. Her disciplinary research primarily involves the use and monitoring of geosynthetic materials (polymeric materials) incorporated into Civil Engineering Structures including roadways and earth retaining structures. She is currently
develop grade level appropriate lesson plans based ontheir experiences. The five-week program consisted of teachers conducting team-based research,weekly meetings with graduate student mentors, reviewing journal articles, attendingprofessional development meetings, and building scientific written and verbal communicationskills. The weekly themes were 1) Orientation, Literature Review and Introduction to Python, 2)Introduction to OpenCV and Basics of Computer Vision, 3) Introduction to Machine Learning,4) Implement the Monitoring, and 5) Analyzing Data, Developing Lessons and ResearchPresentations (see Table 2 for detailed program agenda).Table 2. PATHS-UP Virtual RET Program Monday Tuesday Wednesday
learning for a large introductory mechanics course using mobile phone data capture and peer feedbackAbstractProject-based learning (PBL) has been shown to result in many benefits, including improvedconceptual understanding and enhanced skills in communication, teamwork, and creativity, allwidely acknowledged to be core capabilities for engineers. However, implementations of PBLfrequently rely on large course staffs or small class sizes to be effective. In this paper we present aPBL implementation strategy used in an introductory dynamics course at the University of Illinoisat Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), which scales up to 500 students per term. This large-scale usageof PBL relies on two key implementation
Clarkson University Potsdam, New York, U.S.A {dhou, yuliu}@clarkson.edu Abstract This paper summarizes the best practices and lessons learned from organizing an effective remote REU Site during COVID-19. Our REU Site is a three-year program that is designed to offer closely-mentored summer research experience to a cohort of ten students in each of the three years. COVID-19 has disrupted our site by forcing us to split our second cohort to two groups, two students in summer 2020 and seven students in summer 2021. However, the experience that we gained in summer 2020 by mentoring the two students virtually online
13.998.2Different approaches to mentoring GSIs currently exist in current literature and practice. Westudied examples of previously implemented faculty-student mentoring, peer mentoring in pairs,and centralized peer mentoring programs for comparison with the EGSM initiative.Faculty-graduate student teams can effectively give the GSI a teaching internship opportunitywhere the GSI shares the teaching responsibilities with a faculty mentor 3, 4, 5or even serves as theprimary instructor with the faculty member in a supervisory role.6 In some cases, faculty- andGSI-development professionals provide consulting and mentoring services.7 This technique hasproved effective for helping the graduate student grow as a teacher and prepare for an academiccareer. While
Paper ID #12344Virtual Peer Teams: Connecting Students with the Online Work Environ-mentDr. Thalia Anagnos, San Jose State University Dr. Thalia Anagnos is a professor in the General Engineering Department at San Jose State University, where she has taught since 1984. From 2009 to 2014 she served as co-Leader of Education, Outreach, and Training (EOT) for the George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES), a consortium of 14 large-scale earthquake engineering experimental facilities. As co-Leader of NEES EOT she also served on the leadership team for the NEES REU program.Ms. Alicia L Lyman-Holt