marginalized populations at the organizational level. Her current research projects include exploring relationships between STEM graduate student funding types, educa- tional experiences, and skill development, as well as examining the relationship between Responsibility Center Management (RCM) and administrative outcomes. She holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education from Virginia Tech, an M.B.A. from Lynchburg College, and a B.A. in Spanish from Mars Hill College.Dr. Lisa D. McNair, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Lisa D. McNair is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she also serves as Director of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and
conceptualized as comprising two dimensions:leadership competence and policy control [16], [17]. Leadership competence encompasses one’sbeliefs about their skills for organizing and leading groups and policy control is a person’s beliefthey can influence decisions about policy in an organization or community [16]. Understandingcivil engineering undergraduate students' sociopolitical control beliefs may provide insight abouttheir agency to participate in activities that promote systemic change related to infrastructureinequities.MethodsParticipants and ProceduresStudy data for this project included survey responses to validated scales measuring: criticalconsciousness, system justification beliefs, social empathy, and sociopolitical control
. As a result, student advice presented in this paper reflects on theuntimely shift to online learning and provides insights to future online learners, from a group ofunwilling online students, on how to succeed in online courses.MethodsAt the conclusion of the 2020 spring semester, 233 students (across 67 project teams) in the FirstYear Engineering (FYE) program at a public Midwestern STEM-oriented university were givena group assignment. This assignment asked student teams to provide advice for future onlinestudents on how to succeed in the online learning environment through a survey administeredusing the university learning management system. The assignment administered builds onprevious research conducted in 2019 to obtain student advice
homework, in class exercises and discussions,quizzes and exams. The EML was infused into the course by revising one of the homeworkassignments and turning another one into a class project. The two assignments combined targetthe entire course learning outcomes listed above.Implementation and RelevanceThe EML assignments were composed of an in-class activity and a follow up report, andreplaced the traditional homework assignments targeting the same course learning outcomes. Thefirst assignment was executed early in the semester in week 3; the second assignment wasscheduled towards the end of the semester, in week 11.Assignment 1:This assignment was designed to help students learn the fundamentals of descriptive statisticsand how to characterize a
morale.Throughout this process, the organizers learned the importance of communicating a clearproblem statement, collecting structured stakeholder feedback early, keeping an open mind,utilizing low fidelity prototypes, and employing project management tools. Over the past year,organizers gained experience from their successes and failures, and these valuable lessons can beapplied to any organization seeking to manage the unexpected.I. IntroductionThis case study focuses on the EcoCAR Mobility Challenge organizers’ effort towardimplementing contingency thinking to address stakeholder value and organizational stressors inan ever-changing COVID-19 environment.A. Historical Competition BackgroundFor over 30 years, Argonne National Laboratory has managed multi
of abilities required to succeed professionally in theinformation age. The top four of these skills include critical thinking, creative thinking,collaboration, and communication [1]. In a typical engineering education curriculum, criticalthinking is addressed effectively. Also, students develop their collaboration skills via project-basedcourses that have become increasingly widespread in engineering education in the last twodecades. Furthermore, communication skills are often addressed through the inclusion of atechnical communication course or by otherwise satisfying the communication component ofestablished general education requirements. Laboratory experiences and project-based coursesemphasize the development of technical communication
native of the Republic of Liberia. Growing up as a kid, he has always been interested in computers, how they work, and their evolving applications. As a result of his curiosity regarding the use of computers, he developed a strong desire to enter the engineering field, which supersedes the goal of just finding a steady job. He holds an MSc. in Computer Engineering and is very passionate about Engineering Education and its application in developing countries. Over the years, he had led several student-centered projects and programs that promote STEM Education and Innovation. Collins creates and uploads Tech-Education-related content via Facebook and YouTube helping others improve their technical skills and remain
Digital Logic courses in Computer Science curriculum, andfor recruiting undergraduate researchers in cybersecurity related disciplines. We relate anecdotalsuccess in using the tool for such engagements and context for student involvement as part of anobject-oriented and agile software engineering project.1. IntroductionDigital logic instruction is typically a core component of Computer Science (CS), ElectricalEngineering (EE), and Computer Engineering (CpE) curricula. Most often, students are exposedto digital logic concepts early in their programs as a foundational steppingstone. CS students donot typically explore digital logic concepts further during their programs except as backgroundknowledge for courses like Computer Architecture or
practices in engineering education. His current duties include assessment, team development, outreach and education research for DC Colorado’s hands-on initiatives.Dr. Beverly Louie, University of Colorado Boulder Beverly Louie is the Faculty Advancement Research Associate in the University of Colorado Boulder’s College of Engineering and Applied Science. Formerly she was the Director for teaching and learning initiatives in the Broadening Opportunities through the Broadening Opportunity through Leadership and Diversity (BOLD) Center, Director for the Women in Engineering Program and senior instructor in en- gineering courses ranging from first-year projects and chemical engineering unit operations. She holds B.S
, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.Dr. Chris Swan, Tufts University Chris Swan is Dean of Undergraduate Education for the School of Engineering and an associate pro- fessor in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. He has additional appointments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engage- ment, service-based projects and examining whether an entrepreneurial mindset can be used to further engineering education innovations. He also does research on the development of sustainable materials management (SMM) strategies.Dr. Daniel
approaches to a broader audience.Dr. Edwin van Hassel, University of Antwerp Edwin van Hassel is an assistant professor at the Faculty of Transport and Regional economics, Antwerp University where he is also teaching three courses. He has an engineering degree in naval architecture and he has a PhD in applied economics. His main research interest and expertise is in inland navigation, port hinterland transport, ship design and transport modelling. He holds a PhD with a topic in the field of inland waterway transport. More recently the scope of his work has been extended to maritime cost chain modelling. He also is involved in several research ranging from logistics projects to infrastructure cost benefit analysis and
setting. Lab space was limited to~16-18 students per room, with two rooms available to the two sections of the lab. While themajority of students enrolled in the F2F section of the class, various restrictions and quarantineevents for students living on campus meant that a sizeable portion of students might beparticipating virtually during a given week. To accommodate the varying needs of all thesestudents, the introductory and expository portions of the course were streamed live and recordedvia the Zoom web conferencing platform. The instructor would deliver a prelab lecture and discussmaterial in one room with the content streamed live and projected in the second laboratory room.Students working remotely could follow along synchronously and all
,experimentation, and "learning by doing" to demolish the myth that STEM careers are only formen, encouraging more girls to participate. Colden, an academician from the School of PhysicalSciences, had a similar opinion, stating that face-to-face activities such as science fairs, wherehigh school students can carry out experiments and projects, are crucial to increasing interest inSTEM.SpeakersTo construct the interview protocol, the researchers of this study built a list of possible questionsthrough brainstorming. Then, considering the length of the interview, we categorized thequestions into themes and rephrased them to focus on the objective of the interview. Four mainthemes turned out to be the most important 1) culture and family, 2) professional
answering individual/groupquestions as needed. Throughout the course of the semester, students would complete a project(in teams) and three examinations. Mid-March 2020, however, COVID-19 forced AE 30 to moveto an online modality. A synchronous online class format was adopted for AE 30 for theremainder of the Spring 2020 semester. In the online class format, students joined a synchronousclass meeting for lecture and another one for lab through the videoconferencing software Zoom.Office hours also became an online Zoom meeting. Instead of walking around lab to answerquestions, the instructor and the few students that attended lab would talk through questions as agroup via Zoom. In the online environment, students were able to share their computer
and include topics in structural engineering, earthquake engineering, construction man- agement, transportation engineering, and engineering education. She also advises the Student Chapters of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) at New Mexico Tech.Ms. Janille A. Smith-Colin, Southern Methodist University Janille Smith-Colin is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and a Fellow of Caruth Institute for Engineering Education at Southern Methodist University (SMU). She also leads the Infrastructure Projects and Organizations Research Group at SMU, whose mission is to advance sustainability and resilience goals through
information, the General Causality Orientations Scale (GCOS) [6] score, andaspect of student learning, as it is how instructors communicate Exams, Quizzes, In-lab Activities, Lab Assignments, Projects, In-class Activities, Class Assignments, or self-identified feedback preferences. Students were recruited for themisconceptions or gaps in knowledge to learners [2] and therefore, a Other, allowing them to enter an additional activity used. Instructors could also select that they do not quantitative data collection in Fall 2020. This quantitative data was used toworthwhile and deserving focus
perceived appropriateness? 4. What are teachers’ rationales for (a) integrating or (b) not integrating specific digital technologies? Literature ReviewEngineering, Technology, and Science: Natural Integration Opportunities for PositiveOutcomesFor decades, educational researchers have espoused integrated science instruction as a means toincrease student engagement, interest in science, and achievement (e.g., Roth, 2001). As a result,many different commercial curricula (e.g., Engineering is Elementary, Project Lead the Way,Lego Robotics) and open-source software (e.g., WISEngineering) exist to facilitate integratedinstruction. Further, design-based, project-based, and problem-based learning can
physics. Perhaps thesubject matter is uncomfortable. How does one justify an ethical position without the experienceof application of an ethical decision? Are ethical guidelines too strict in their interpretation, orare there areas of gray, where the interpretation varies from engineer to engineer based on theirhome teachings, beliefs, and experiences? And given these possibilities, what are theramifications the engineer must understand if an ethical challenge is presented?RamificationsIn projects that encounter an ethical dilemma, there is seldom a simple choice, yes or no, good,or bad, right or wrong. Most problems that have such a decision base are more centered onmoral grounds which are based on youthful teachings in the home. Most ethical
SWIVL device showing (a) the SWIVL base and USB speaker and (b) the marker While using Zoom through the iPad in the primary means of projecting a view of theinstructor to the students, the projector in each classroom runs on a separate computer and it isoften useful to sign into the Zoom meeting with this computer also. Through this computer, anumber of other in-class technologies can be utilized. The simplest method is to use the ShareScreen feature on Zoom from this computer so that the exact image projected onto the screen inthe classroom is shared at full resolution to remote students, reducing issues with the iPadcamera quality. Alternatively, a separate camera can be connected to this computer for differenttypes of demonstrations
Paper ID #32956Equity, Engineering, and Excellence: Pathways to Student SuccessDr. Doris J. Espiritu, Wilbur Wright College Doris J. Espiritu, PhD is the Executive Director of the College Center of Excellence in Engineering and Computer Science and a professor of Chemistry at Wright College. Doris Espiritu is one of the first National Science Foundation’s research awardees under the Hispanic- Serving Institutions (HSI) Program. She pioneered Engineering at Wright and had grown the Engineering program enrollment by 700 % within two years of the NSF-HSI project. Doris founded six student chapters of national organizations
case we could not locate such information [36]. We then performed data processing and endedwith n = 1,775 records for the next step in our analysis. We applied the following Python librariesand packages to process the data: • Pandas: an open-source data analysis and manipulation tool for Python [37]. We used version 1.1.0 in the analysis. • Numpy: an open-source project to enable numerical computing in Python [38]. We applied version 1.18.1. • lxml: a Python library for processing XML and HTML [39], and we used version 4.3.0 in data collection and processing. • Natural Language Toolkit (NLTK): a suite of open-source libraries for symbolic and sta- tistical natural language processing for English written in
their non-ELC peers.BackgroundPrior research has suggested several potential contributing factors to lower rates of academicsuccess and retention within undergraduate engineering. These include lack of support andrecognition [2], inadequate advising [3], and feelings of disconnection to peers and faculty [4]–[6]. In addition to these factors linked with negative student outcomes, research has alsoidentified a host of best practices linked to positive student outcomes. Called high-impactpractices, these include learning communities, first-year seminars, writing-intensive courses,problem-based learning, collaborative assignments, and research and service opportunities [7].Specific to engineering, the use of hands-on collaborative design projects
. They crossed paths at events on campus before attendingthe same open house session for the Ph.D. program. Once they enrolled in the same program,they were part of the same cohort where they took many of the same classes, were part of thesame project teams and reading groups, and eventually shared social circles. Through theseshared experiences, they started talking about their experiences with the Ph.D. program,including similar observations and commonalities. Their similar prior experiences withengineering (especially their prior M.S. degrees at Purdue) and the accompanying uneasecontributed to them interrogating their experiences further, which formed the seed for this work.ScopingWe find it important to note that we write about the soul of
using amodern engineering tool. One significant advantage is that we can solve symbolic equations forany variable value. Therefore, the design process generally requires solving problems over arange of variable values to obtain a satisfactory design. An essential part of our approach iseducating our students to question, test, and verify “answers” to all of their problem solutions.Verifying answers is done by developing and implementing test case scenarios to verify theproblem’s validity. Lecture examples and homework problems throughout the course are solvedwith all equations formulated symbolically, and test cases are used to verify the equations. Thecircular shaft design project is divided into multiple phases. Each phase of the project
One” in The Serial Pod- cast and Storytelling in the Digital Age (Routledge, 2016), ”Sweeney Todd as Victorian Transmedial Storyworld” and ”The Sympathy of Suspense: Gaskell and Braddon’s Slow and Fast Sensation Fiction in Family Magazines” (both in Victorian Periodicals Review (49.1: 2016, 49.3: 2016)). Her current book project examines the dynamics of transfictional characters in the British long nineteenth century.Dr. Duane Lewis Abata, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Dr. Abata has worked in academia for over forty years at universities and with the Federal government around the country. He began his career at the University of Wisconsin, served as Associate Dean and Dean at Michigan Technological
understanding of the aims and uses of engineering knowledge. The purpose of this work is to explore if there is a relationship between a participant’srace/ethnic background and the paradigm which they hold, specifically that of the NewEcological Paradigm. This will provide educators and researchers a way to increase ourknowledge for broadening the participation of traditionally marginalized populations inengineering. This project utilized existing survey data of senior engineering students at a U.S.university to investigate this relationship. It is hypothesized that students from traditionallyunderrepresented groups and people of color will be more likely to endorse the New EcologicalParadigm than their White counterparts. A Pearson’s chi-square
with theparticipation of undergraduate computer science students in the last year of their studies to validatethe effectiveness of the CT assessment framework.(c) Computational thinking assessment in formal undergraduate coursesLibeskind-Hadas and Bush [32], assessed student success by scoring the student solutions on theirfinal projects from a Biocomp course at Harvey Mudd College for correct functionality, quality ofdesign, ability to communicate their computational approach in writing, and ability to use theirprogram for scientific exploration as assessed however the framework followed for assessmentwas not clearly described. Mishra and Iyer [33], used a grounded theory-based assessmentframework in an AI course to assess the quality of
taught and collaborated on research related to equity and social justice. With her colleagues at Cal State LA she recently received an NSF grant called Eco- STEM which aims to transform STEM education using an asset-based ecosystem model. Specifically, the Eco-STEM project focuses on shifting the metaphor in STEM education from a factory model to an ecosystem model. This Ecosystem model aspires towards an organic and healthy environment that nurtures students, faculty, and staff to become individuals fulfilled professionally and personally. She is also a co-advisor to Engineers without Borders and Critical Global Engagement at Cal Poly. American c Society
specific, distinct items mentioned by students ranged from zero to four,with an average of 1.6.Essays were also analyzed for non-content-based connections, which were defined for purposesof this study as those connections based in any skills that could be learned in a class that werenot uniquely tied to the class content itself. This could include problem-solving skills that couldbe applied to a wide range of tasks, time management, writing or reflection skills, teamwork, orthe ability to carry out an engineering project. Students provided fewer examples of non-content-based connections between the class and their co-op jobs, with an average of 1.1 specific itemslisted, and overall exhibited a lower level of perceived connections in this area. The
#3: Cold Working and Rockwell Hardness TestingLab #3 focuses on cold working and Rockwell hardness testing. In the demonstration, six HRC indents aremade on three different cold rolled Steel test blocks, and imaged using a 9600 dpi scanner. Using FijI, anellipse is fitted to each indent, and its area and perimeter values are recorded. In research, MeyerHardness, defined as Load in Kgf divided by the projected area of indentation in mm2, is often used.Meyer hardness correlates extremely well with HRC. From the perimeter and the cone angle of thediamond indenter, the depth of the indentation is calculated.For the assignment, students are provided with images of six HRBw indents on three different coldrolled Brass test blocks. They are asked to