Conference Session

Questions of Identity

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Ollis, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

origin again, from a new light. Or, inElliot,’s words 15: “We shall not cease from exploration And the end of all our exploring Will be to arrive where we started And know the place for the first time If the premise is correct that many of the “Tech Lit” instructors are bothrepresenting their disciplines to students, and seeking self in the engineering cosmos, thentwo things naturally follow: 1. Their diversity of disciplines works against development of a consensus Page 11.1227.12 version of Technological Literacy, although one could imagine a collection of versions as constituting an encyclopedia of

Conference Session

ELD Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bruce Reid, Pennsylvania State University-Wilkes-Barre

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Libraries

must understand that their staff is always looking to you to set the course.You are their leader, the responsibility is yours. Page 11.324.12Bibliography The Associated Press. (2003). Coach known best for 1980 hockey gold. Retrieved 5/8/2005 from http://espn.go.com/classic/obit/s/2003/0811/1594173.html Bezilla, M. (1995). The coach as a fund raiser. Fund Raising Management, 26, 20-25. Retrieved 6/9/2003 from the Proquest Database. Biro, B. (1997). Beyond success: the 15 secrets to effective leadership and life based on legendary coach John Wooden’s Pyramid of Success. Hamilton, Montana: Pygmalion. Collier, G

Conference Session

Knowing Our Students II

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joachim Walther, University of Queensland; David Radcliffe, University of Queensland

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

s Educational background Family background Learning s na l nce n ti o Innate Traits

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katrina Ramsdell, Virginia Tech; Madeline Schreiber, Virginia Tech; Maura Borrego, Virginia Tech; Michael Alley, Virginia Tech

Conference Session

Effective & Efficient Teaching Skills

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexis Powe, Mississippi State University; Jane Moorhead, Mississippi State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

teach or evaluate these subjects.”2 Developing an effective—and efficient—grading approachis particularly difficult for new educators who lack confidence in their evaluation abilities orthose of their teaching assistants (to whom the grading often falls). Meanwhile, technicalwriting educators constantly seek to reinforce the importance of writing to students outside of thewriting class. Both interests, and ultimately those of students, are served when educators from Page 11.669.2various engineering departments work with technical writing educators to develop a gradingsystem that provides specific grading criteria for the grader(s) to ensure

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald Elger, University of Idaho; Scott Metlen, University of Idaho; Robert Carson, University of Idaho; Tristan Utschig, Lewis-Clark State College; Dan Cordon, University of Idaho; Marie Racine, University of District Columbia; Steven Beyerlein, University of Idaho

: Introduction to Interviewing Techniques. 2004, Worcester Polytechnic Institute.3. Garvin, D. A. (2000). Learning in action: A guide to putting the learning organization to work. Boston, Massa- chusetts: Harvard Business School Press.4. Handy, C. (1995). Managing the dream. Edited by Chawla, S. & Renesch, J. Learning organizations. Portland, Oregon: Productivity Press.5. Knowles, M. (1975). Self-Directed Learning. Chicago: Follet. ISBN 08428221516. Knowles, M. (1984a). The Adult Learner: A Neglected Species

Conference Session

Climate Issues for Women Students

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rose Mary Cordova-Wentling, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign; Cristina Camacho, University of Illinois-Urbana Champaign

Tagged Divisions

Women in Engineering

of U.S. citizens who are training tobecome scientists and engineers, whereas the number of jobs requiring science and engineering(S&E) training continues to grow” (p.1). “If trends continue the United States will lose its abilityto fill the growing demand for science and engineering jobs, yielding [its] global standing tonations such as China and India who are training thousands more engineers and scientists than isthe U.S.” (O’Brien50, 2004, p. 1).The U.S. Department of Commerce62 (1999) projects that by 2010, 50 percent of all U.S. Page 11.1454.2workers will be women. This projection, plus the growth in the science and engineering

Conference Session

Professional Graduate Education & Industry Duplicate Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Donald Keating, University of South Carolina; Thomas Stanford, University of South Carolina; John Bardo, Western Carolina University; Duane Dunlap, Western Carolina University; Eugene DeLoatch, Morgan State University; Albert McHenry, Arizona State University; Joseph Tidwell, Arizona State University; Niaz Latif, Purdue University; Dennis Depew, Purdue University; Mark Schuver, Purdue University; David Quick; Roger Olson, Rolls-Royce; Samuel Truesdale, Rolls-Royce; Jay Snellenberger, Rolls-Royce; Stephen Tricamo, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Harvey Palmer, Rochester Institute of Technology; Mohammad Noori, California State Polytechnic University; Kathleen Gonzalez Landis, University of Arizona; Ronald Bennett, University of St. Thomas

industry for competitiveness and the nation’s defense.Whereas the nation invested heavily during the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s, and 90’s in the graduateeducation of the U.S. scientific workforce for basic academic research, we have not as a nationplaced a balanced emphasis in the further professional education of the nation’s graduateengineers who enter industry and are the nation’s primary creators, developers, and leaders ofU.S. technological progress for competitiveness and national security purposes.As a consequence of this unbalanced emphasis, lasting over four decades, the U.S. engineeringworkforce in industry is the nation’s most underdeveloped resource for innovation. The nation ispaying the price for long-term underdevelopment of the U.S

Conference Session

Hurricane Katrina

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

W. Robert Story, Virginia Tech; Brian LeCroy, Virginia Tech; Christina Pace, Virginia Tech; Michael Palmer, Virginia Tech; Leigh McCue, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Ocean and Marine

. Page 11.309.32.0 Case Studies2.1 Inland Storms: The Edmund FitzgeraldSevere weather has threatened vessels on the Great Lakes for years. For example, during theGreat Lakes Storm of 1913, at least 19 ships sank, killing 248 aboard.7 In the 1970’s, perhaps themost mysterious of Great Lakes shipwrecks occurred, the wreck of the S.S. Edmund Fitzgerald.When the Edmund Fitzgerald set out for Zug Island on November 9, 1975 there was a galewarning issued by the National Weather Service. Winds were reported at speeds greater than 50knots, and waves were estimated to be over 10 feet high.8 The Fitzgerald continued to move outinto the storm, which proved deadly. They were out of sight and off the radar in just minutes.The members of the ship did not send

Conference Session

Professional Graduate Education & Industry Duplicate Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Duane Dunlap, Western Carolina University; John Bardo, Western Carolina University; Donald Keating, University of South Carolina; Thomas Stanford, University of South Carolina; Eugene DeLoatch, Morgan State University; Albert McHenry, Arizona State University; Joseph Tidwell, Arizona State University; Niaz Latif, Purdue University; Mark Schuver, Purdue University; Dennis Depew, Purdue University; Roger Olson, Rolls-Royce; David Quick; Stephen Tricamo, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Samuel Truesdale, Rolls-Royce; Jay Snellenberger, Rolls-Royce; Harvey Palmer, Rochester Institute of Technology; Mohammad Noori, North Carolina State University; Kathleen Gonzalez Landis, University of Arizona; Ronald Bennett, University of St. Thomas

,Engineering, and Public Policy (COSEPUP)3 has pointed out, graduate education in engineeringhas evolved primarily in the United States as a byproduct of a national science policy forscientific research. The United States has not had a coherent policy for the graduate developmentof the vast majority of its domestic engineering graduates in the U.S. engineering workforcewhose professional careers are not centered on academic scientific research but rather arecentered on creating, developing, and innovating new, improved, and breakthrough technologyin industry for competitiveness and the nation’s defense.Whereas the nation invested heavily during the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s, and 90’s in the graduate

Conference Session

Factors Affecting Student Performance

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abel Fernandez, University of the Pacific; Camilla Saviz, University of the Pacific; Jeff Burmeister, University of the Pacific

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Camilla M. Saviz, Ph.D., P.E., holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Clarkson University, an MBA from the New York Institute of Technology, and a Ph.D. degree in Civil and Environmental Engineering from U.C. Davis. She is currently an associate professor in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of the Pacific. Dr. Saviz' research interests include measurement and modeling of hydrodynamics, water quality, and sediment transport in surface water systems. She has also served as co-principal investigator on several studies to develop and implement strategies to enhance the quality of engineering education.Jeff Burmeister, University of the Pacific Jeffrey S

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Curricula

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Oerther, University of Cincinnati; Cathy Maltbie, University of Cincinnati; Baikun Li, Pennsylvania State University-Harrisburg; Jin Li, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee; Amy Pruden, Colorado State University; Peter Stroot, University of South Florida

Tagged Divisions

Environmental Engineering

review, discussion and labs. readings, discussions and labs class presentation, and labs. discussions and labs.University of Cincinnati, Daniel B. OertherUC is a comprehensive, research-extensive institution offering doctoral degrees from thirteencolleges. The program of Environmental Engineering and Science (EE&S) within theDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering is one of the strongest programs at UC witha compliment of twelve faculty and research expenditures above $4M per year. Because of thetremendous strength of the EE&S program, the PI was afforded the opportunity to develop a newand highly experimental

Conference Session

Novel BME Courses and Course Adaptations

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Conrad Zapanta, Pennsylvania State University; Keefe Manning, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Biomedical

than 6.0. Thehighest scores were for effectiveness in demonstrating the significance of the subject matter, andthe overall quality of instructor(s). The lowest scores were for adequacy of the physical facilitiesand the instructional resources.For Spring of 2005, the undergraduates rated all nine areas higher than 6.0. The undergraduatesgave the highest scores to the effectiveness in demonstrating significance of the subject matterand the instructor’s interest in whether or not the students understood the course content. Theundergraduates gave the lowest scores for clarity of instructor’s interpretation of abstract ideasand adequacy of physical facilities. The graduate students rated eight out of nine areas higherthan 6.0. The graduate students

Conference Session

Computer ET Curriculum

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeffrey Honchell, Purdue University; Gregory Palmier, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology

by undergraduatesrequires ease of understanding so that design alternatives of computer systems can beapplied.In a paper describing the evolution of computer performance evaluation since the 1960’s,benchmarking was described as the only technique to receive consistent use as aperformance evaluation tool [5]/ Research emphasized the increasing importance ofperformance evaluation by the establishment of the ACM in 1971. The ACM recognizeda need for understanding the relationship between computer system models and the tollsuseful for performance evaluation. More research shows that most undergraduateengineering programs spend significant time on implementing complex hardware andsoftware designs, but do not utilize performance modeling as a tool

Conference Session

Capstone Design Projects in Mechanical Engineering

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kelley Racicot, Washington State University; Charles Pezeshki, Washington State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

/ir/library/pdf/erm0452.pdf7. Olds, B., Moskal, B., & Miller, R. (2005). Assessment in Engineering Education: Evolution, Approaches and Future Collaborations. Journal of Engineering Education. 94(1) 13-26.8. Pellegrino, J.W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.) (2001), Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.9. Sahney, S., Banwet, D.K., & Karunes, S. (2004). Conceptualizing Total Quality Management in Higher Education. TQM Magazine, 16(2) 145-159.10. Tsoukas, H. (2005). Complex Knowledge: Studies in Organizational Epistemology. Oxford Press

Conference Session

Design for Manufacture and Industry

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Semke, University of North Dakota; Richard Schultz, University of North Dakota; James Albrecht, Imation Corp.; Jason Moses, Imation Corp.; Peter Ridl, Imation Corp.

Tagged Divisions

Design in Engineering Education

Faculty Advisor(s): Name(s) Partners: UND Department(s), Company Project Title Description: One- or two-sentence description. BLOCK Problems to Solve (Why work on this project?): 1. Problem/ Benefit #1 DIAGRAM 2. Problem/ Benefit #2

Conference Session

Questions of Identity

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William Jordan, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

Liberal Education

. Page 11.142.2Introduction to Virtue EthicsVirtue ethics is not a new concept. Most people regard it as something that was initiallydeveloped (as far as the Western world is concerned) by Aristotle more than 2300 years ago.Many ethical approaches concentrate on how to make good decisions when faced with difficultsituations. Aristotle’s approach was to emphasize virtuous living. A good person will makegood decisions, so what is important is to become a good person. In the 1200’s ThomasAquinas integrated this philosophy with a Christian perspective on the world. Aquinas’perspective was to dominate Western philosophical thinking for hundreds of years. For much ofthe 20th century virtue ethics was not commonly taught as a viable option by most

Conference Session

Software Engineering Teaching Methods and Practice

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yung-Hsiang Lu, Purdue University; Mark C Johnson, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

steps. All five teams passedthe qualification procedure and entered the final competition. Every team was encouragedto post the latest program (executable without the source code) on their web site in thefifteenth week so that the other teams could test and improve. The final competition washeld on the last day of the fifteenth week. The sixteenth week was used for the students toanalyze their competition results and to finish the final reports. Page 11.1223.7 player 1 player 2 spectator(s) network game serverFigure 2: Two

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

La Verne Abe Harris, Arizona State University; Rajeswari Sundararajan, Arizona State University; David Machado-Aranda, Northwestern University Medical School; David A. Dean, Northwestern University Medical School

injected into the trachea, which was exposed through a small incision in the neck, and allowed to distribute throughout the lungs by holding the animal upright. • The chest was wetted with 70% ethanol and within 30-60 s of DNA delivery. • Electrodes were placed on either side of the chest and the animal

Conference Session

Incorporating Projects into the Curriculum

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Shanzhong (Shawn) Duan, South Dakota State University; Li Qian, South Dakota State University; Teresa Hall, South Dakota State University

Tagged Divisions

Mechanical Engineering

11.1433.12Bibliography1. Amirouche, F. M. L. (1992). Computational Methods for Multibody Dynamics. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.2. Anderson, K. S. and Critchley, J. H. (2003). Improved order-N performance algorithm for the simulation ofconstraint multi-rigid-body systems,” Multibody System Dynamics, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2003, pp.185 – 212.3. Anderson, K.S. and Duan, S. Z. (2000). Highly Parallelizable Low Order Dynamics Algorithm for ComplexMulti-Rigid-Body Systems. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. Vol. 23, No. 2, March-April, 2000,pp. 355-364.4. Barrott, J. L. (2001). Why Should Case Studies be Integrated into the Engineering Technology Curriculum.Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &

Conference Session

Programs for High School Students

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Barbara Christie, Loyola Marymount University

Tagged Divisions

K-12 & Pre-College Engineering

11.3% of theengineering undergraduate degrees. These same race/ethnic groups are projected to make up Page 11.369.4 333.9% of the U.S. population graduating from high school in 2014. Engineering degreesawarded to women have followed a similar trajectory-growth through the 1990’s with apercentage peak in 2000 at 20.6% of the total. In 2003, women represented 20.1% of thebaccalaureates awarded in engineering (Society of Women Engineers). According to Science (Culotta 1993), a publication of the American Association for theAdvancement of Science

Conference Session

Faculty Involvement in International Engineering Education

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jongwon Kim, Seoul National University; Dong Mok Kim, Seoul National University; Stefano Consiglio, Technical University of Berlin; Semih Severengiz, Technical University of Berlin; Guenther Seliger, Technical University of Berlin; Lalit Patil, University of Michigan; Debasish Dutta, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

International

are drawbacks inthis model too. Students often seek advice from the local faculty, and communicate it to theirteam members. This may lead to conflicting views as described earlier, although the chances ofsuch occurrence are low. More importantly, although the instructors grade GPD projects andteams jointly, the “local” instructor determines the final grade for each student at his/herinstitution. The instructor has a much deeper knowledge about the teams and the project works/he has supervised. It is difficult for the “local” instructor to understand the subtle decisionsmade by a team s/he did not supervise. Currently, the “local” instructor follows the progress ofhis “local” students independent of their teams by interacting frequently with

Conference Session

Installing & Assessing Technology Literacy Courses

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Camille George, University of St. Thomas; Elise Amel, University of St. Thomas; Karl Mueller, University of St. Thomas

Tagged Divisions

Technological Literacy Constituent Committee

Wisconsin-Madison No. RED-9452971).6. Felder, R.M., Felder, G.N., & Dietz, E.J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering studentperformance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91, 3-17.7. Isaacs, B., & Tempei, P. (2001). Student projects that celebrate engineering: A path to diversity in the profession.ASEE/IEEE Proceedings- Frontiers in Education Conference, 3, S1F/1-4. Reno, NV.8. Williams, R. (2003). Education for the profession formerly known as engineering. The Chronicle of HigherEducation, 49, B12-13.9. Ettema, R. (2000). A drift in the curriculum. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education andPractice, 126, 21-26.10. Beder, S. (1999). Beyond technicalities: Expanding engineering thinking

Conference Session

Software Engineering Teaching Methods and Practice

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Durant, Milwaukee School of Engineering

Tagged Divisions

Software Engineering Constituent Committee

presentation that counts for 5% of thecourse grade. In this presentation, they summarize the goals and context diagram beforepresenting a few functional and non-functional requirements, with an emphasis on how therequirements can be traced back to use cases, goals, etc.In an effort to increase the actual and apparent objectivity of the evaluation of the presentation,and to let students know, very specifically, how they will be evaluated, a group presentationrubric was developed [Appendix A]. This rubric was created by modifying one that the authordeveloped for senior design presentations and which has been in use for nearly two years. Threerequirements-specific sections were added: Use Case(s), Functional and Non-functionalRequirements, and Postmortem

Conference Session

Course-based Approaches to Entrepreneurship Education

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Doug Abbott, MT Tech of the U of MT; Lance Edwards, MT Tech of the U of MT; John Evans, MT Tech of the U of MT; Leo Heath, MT Tech of the U of MT; Mike Johnson, MT Tech of the U of MT; Timothy Kober, MT Tech of the U of MT; Mary North-Abbott, MT Tech of the U of MT; Roger Oldenkamp, MT Tech of the U of MT

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

abachelor’s degree program titled “Technology and Business Development,” which the framerspurposely designed as entrepreneurial type program that matched the role and scope of theuniversity as well as a program that did not directly compete with the business administrationprograms offered at the neighboring state funded campuses. The business department wasn’tparticularly fond of the name of the new business program and in the late 1990’s the opportunitypresented itself to change the business offerings at the school and Montana Tech started the newcentury by offering a bachelors program in Business and Information Technology with threeoptions including Business Information Systems, Management, and Entrepreneurship.Historically, the entrepreneurship

Conference Session

Emerging Trends in Engineering Education Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

K. V. Sudhakar, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla; Tadeusz Majewski, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla; Luis Maus, Universidad de las Americas-Puebla

the theoretical relation between the amplitude and frequency is A / x st = 1 / (1 − s 2 ) 2 + ( 2εs ) 2 s=Ω/ωo, (4)where Ω is the frequency of excitation, ωo is the natural frequency of the system, and ε -damping ratio. Page 11.767.4The theoretical characteristic can be compared with the diagram from the experiment. Byknowing the amplitude of resonance then the damping ratio of the system can be calculatedfrom ε=2xst/Ares. With two laboratory stands students can learn about systems with 1DOF, their free andforced vibrations, and what properties the systems with 1DOF have; natural frequency,damping

Conference Session

Innovative Teaching Techniques in Mechanics

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Louis Everett, University of Texas-El Paso; Arunkumar Pennathur; Elsa Villa, University of Texas-El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. Journal of Learning Sciences, 7(3 and 4), 271-312.7. Schwartz, D.L., Lin, X., Brophy, S. and Bransford, J.D. (1999). Toward the development of flexibly adaptive instructional designs. In Instructional Design Theories and Models: volume II (Ed. Reigelut, C.M.), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, p182-213.8. Linn, M.C., Songer, N.B. and Eylon, B.S. (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In Handbook of Educational Psychology (Eds. Calfee, R.C. and Berliner, D.C.), Riverside, NJ: Macmillan, p438-490.9. Anderson, J.R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.10. Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Corbett, A

Conference Session

What's New in Mechanics of Materials?

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Adam Creuziger, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Wendy Crone, University of Wisconsin-Madison

Tagged Divisions

Mechanics

1-12[7] Origins of Misconceptions in a Materials Concept Inventory From Student Focus Groups.Krause, Stephen; Tasooji, Amaneh; Griffin, Richard. ASEE 2004 Annual Conference andExposition: Engineering Education Researches New Heights, 2004, Session 3464, p 1-8[8] The concept of the concept inventory assessment instrument. Evans, D. L.; Hestenes, David.Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 2001, p F2A-1[9] Instructional software: If you build it, they may or may not come. Roskowski, A. Michel;Felder, Richard M.; Bullard, Lisa G. 2001 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Peppers,Papers, Pueblos and Professors, 2001, p 5971-5976[10] Courseware for problem solving in mechanics of materials. Steif, Paul S. 2002 ASEEAnnual Conference

Conference Session

FPD9 -- Technology & Textbooks

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University

Tagged Divisions

First-Year Programs

Proceedings 1, our preliminary work involved an exploratoryclustering of student performance by using internal metrics only. Based on our exploratory Page 11.586.4method using total course points for the students in CSE 131 in fall, 2004, we reportedpreliminary results that seemed to imply a positive benefit for the lecture as wrap up approach,especially for the higher achieving students. The result was tentative.We noted however, that further work was required to confirm the putative effect. In particular,we noted the need for future research to reanalyze the data using a clustering metric(s) externalto the objective measures of performance in CSE

Conference Session

ECE Poster Session

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yakov Cherner, ATeL, LLC; Amin Karim, DeVry University; Ahmed Khan, DeVry University-Addison; Victor Rubanchik, Don State Technical University (DSTU), Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Tagged Divisions

Electrical and Computer

corporate and military training, and academic education, his company developed a new ground-breaking e-learning solutions and relevant authoring tools. Yakov holds an M.S. in Experimental Physics, and Ph.D. in Physics and Materials Science. He has published over 60 papers in national and international journals and made dozens presentations at various national and international conferences and workshops. Dr. Cherner was a Principal Investigator of several government funded educational projects.Ahmed Khan, DeVry University-Addison Ahmed S. Khan, Ph.D. is a senior Professor in the EET dept. at DeVry University, Addison, Illinois. He received his M.Sc (applied physics) from University of Karachi, an MSEE