)IntroductionThe diversity of the U.S. population is changing with predictions indicating that by 2050 therewill be no “majority race.” Already, Latino and Black communities make up 30% of thecountry’s population [1]. However, this current level of diversity is not reflected in the STEMfields. In engineering, there has only been a small increase in Hispanic graduates from 8.5% in2011 to 11.9% in 2019 and almost no increase in Black graduates (4.2% to 4.3%). Over 50% ofthe engineering graduates nationwide continue to be White [2]. Increasing diversity in STEM isrequired to solve important problems faced by society through a wider array of solutions [3].Unfortunately, Black, Latino, and Indigenous youth often close the door to STEM careers earlyin their
between teams. This work is incredibly important for thecompany, but doesn’t count much toward individual career progress. According to productivity logics, this is actually how it is supposed to work. Media studiesscholar Melissa Gregg [1], in her analysis of self-help literature, points out that people seekingcareer success are encouraged to identify the types of work that are most important and eliminatenon-essential tasks or delegate them to others. The small team leader is doing what he knows isnecessary for his own career progress. The central tension in this story, however, arrives whenwe consider those to whom the non-essential tasks are delegated, the ability of those individualsto resist or otherwise exercise agency in response, and
assignments with lower stakes were duethroughout the week: a reading/lecture quiz, a survey to submit questions, and a shortenedhomework assignment. Finally, we changed some content near the end of the course to allowstudents to connect the course to their own career aspirations, which we expect can aid in long-term retention. Specifically, students chose among several possible topics to cover in the finalweeks, covered via typical pre-recorded lectures and reading, and also guest lectures. They wrotean abstract-length reflection on how they could use what they learned in this course later in theircareers. Overall, students remained engaged with the course throughout the semester andprovided favorable comments and evaluations of the course, including
) and desired personal characteristics for the graduatestudents (e.g., critical thinking, problem-solving approach, data preparation, analytics, andpresentation). The contributions from the advisory board were the driving force for the newdirection and strategy for the graduate program. Industry professionals suggested and inputsfrom the board were successfully incorporated.A study by Stelyn (2019) suggested the perception of students played an important role in thestructure for the new course providing a learning experience. The student feedback and studentfocus group were used in generating new course structure, operations, and the course impact fortheir career. Student evaluations of teaching and learning and student suggestions on
autistic adults often have difficulty joining or remaining in theSTEM workforce [5]. With the goal of creating maker programming to enable autistic youth toengage in the EDP with peers and to prepare autistic youth for future careers, a multidisciplinaryteam created the Inventing, Designing, and Engineering for All Students (IDEAS) MakerProgram. IDEAS brings together experts in maker education, autism inclusion, engineering,co-design, and research to bring interest-driven maker clubs into autism-inclusion public schoolsin New York City. The following paper describes the ways in which IDEAS supports autisticlearners in both in-person and online formats, and how IDEAS teachers responded to adversityby redesigning the curriculum for remote learning
divided among fourresearch mentors.WorkshopsAs part of the Research Scholars Program, the following workshops were developed to introducestudents to different aspects of research: 1. Formulating Your Research Vision 2. Submission & Review Process 3. Getting Your Paper Noticed 4. Academic vs. Industry Research 5. Research Next Steps: Building into Grad School and/or Entrepreneurship 6. Promoting Undergraduate Research on Your ResumeThe first workshop is aimed towards students just starting on their research journey while most ofthe other workshops are aimed at showing students how they can use their research experience toadvance their academic and professional careers. The workshops are organized and hosted by theauthors with guest
students from both programs, a focus on anintroduction to digital logic has superseded the goal of learning the fundamentals of electronics.PurposeThe purpose of this qualitative work-in-progress is to explore the development of a DE coursethat utilizes ubiquitous, affordable, and accessible, tools and practices to provide students with anauthentic, hands-on approach to learning and are applicable and relatable to students’ academicinterests and future career plans.Course BackgroundOne section of DE with 20-24 students is offered each semester and is taught by the sameinstructor. The course typically consists of an even mix of CST and ET students. Prerequisitesfor the course include Finite Mathematics or demonstrated equivalent competencies
institutions. Next, to identify job descriptions,organizational careers websites were accessed to identify current job openings. For instance, ifcompany X was identified, the Careers Section was reviewed from company X using thekeywords: Systems Engineer and Systems Engineering. Then, the job description was aggregatedto a data frame for analysis based on organization domain, roles, life cycle phase, tools, andmethodologies. Each indicator was explored using frequency distribution to derive such patterns. Figure 1. Methodology for systems engineering job description 1. Patterns in Systems Engineering RolesEmergent parents for activities were captured by using the roles defined by the SystemsEngineering Research Center through the
Question 57: Free-text response: Question 58: Was ECAC helpful in finding a BME job, internship or other BME career opportunity? Why or why not? Question 59: What were your career goals when you started in the BME program? Question 60: Did your career goals change? If so, when did they change, and how are they different now? Question 61: When you applied for college, to what other undergraduate BME programs were you offered admission? Question 62: Why did you choose UT Austin BME?Academic
Paper ID #37107Preparing Prospective Engineers for Artemis: Analyzing theEfficacy of MOOCs in a Specific Area of Expertise (WIP)Joselyn Elisabeth Busato Undergraduate Student Bucknell Class of 2024Elif Miskioglu (Assistant Professor) I am an early-career engineering education scholar and educator. I hold a B.S. in Chemical Engineering (with Genetics minor) from Iowa State University, and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from The Ohio State University. My early Ph.D. work focused on the development of bacterial biosensors capable of screening pesticides for specifically targeting the malaria vector
that pairing experienced with new instructors can provide successful mentoring and growthopportunities for both professionals [11],[16],[17].Meanwhile, a non-appreciated tradition in engineering academia is assigning teaching duties to a recentgraduate without any teaching experience. Studies have already shown that graduate students can besuccessful in a co-teaching role, plus they benefit from mentored experience towards a career in academia[8],[17]. As co-teachers, graduate students can potentially relate closer to the students in that classroomgiven how recently they endured through a similar learning experience for those topics. Moreover, thelimited experience of graduates can potentially be more beneficial to students as the questions
Paper ID #37460Expansion of Biomedical Devices in an Engineering DesignProject to Promote Student WellnessIsabel MillerSara Rose Vohra Sara Vohra is an undergraduate studying Bioengineering with a minor in Chemistry at the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. Her interests lie in education as well as medicine with a future career goal as a physician.Calvin CostnerKarin Jensen Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Associate Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and
Force and the Navy who do not choose a career in a construction field.Enlisted personnel who choose a construction trade skill first attend basic training for the specificservice. After successful completion of basic training soldiers and airmen who have contractedfor a construction trade skill -- electrician, carpentry-masonry specialist, plumber, engineertechnician, or heavy equipment operator -- will attend additional training related specific to thatskill. The shortest school is 7 weeks (Army Electrician and Plumber) and the longest is 17 weeks(Army Engineer Technicians). The Air Force has similar trade skills however their training isaligned with the national public sector construction trades apprenticeship programs. Air ForceProfessional
) Marisa K. Orr is an Associate Professor in Engineering and Science Education with a joint appointment in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at Clemson University. Her research interests include student persistence and pathways in engineering, gender equity, diversity, and academic policy. Dr. Orr is a recipient of the NSF CAREER Award for her research entitled, ”Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com NSF RIEF: Influence of Self-Efficacy and Social Support on Persistence and Achievement in Chemical Engineering Sophomores: Measuring
Paper ID #38247Virtual Communities of Practice: Social Capital’s Influenceon Faculty DevelopmentChiebuka EgwuonwuIsabel MillerKarin Jensen Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Associate Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering student career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post
in one's profession requires students to have a deep understanding of the nature anddemands of their profession [21]. This expectation then falls upon educators to know how todesign and manage a learning environment that offers reliable forms of assessment that supportthe students’ developing career identity.2.4 Learning ProgressionsShavelson and Kurpius [22] described learning progressions as a sequence of successively morecomplex ways of reasoning about a set of ideas. These sequences depend on instruction andinteractions with students' prior knowledge and in constructing new knowledge. The goal is tomove learners from being a novice to an expert through extensive experience and practice. Theauthors alerted that learning progressions are
Teaching Scholar, a Graduate Academy for Teaching Excellence Fellow, a Global Perspectives Fellow, a Diversity Scholar, a Fulbright Scholar, an inductee into the Bouchet Honor Society, and received the prestigious NSF CAREER award. Homero serves as the VT Engineering Education Chair for Equity and Inclusion, and the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Incoming Chair for the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of Táchira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. © American Society for
a largerproject. Next, we establish the criteria for quality, ethics, and equity that we considered. Then,we step through the purpose, theory, sampling, and instrumentation sections in light of thecriteria established. Finally, we present the decision we came to in light of those criteria and ournext steps. In making this process transparent, we hope to help new engineering educationresearchers understand the complex considerations that come with executing a research project. 2. Positionality & ContextThe research team is composed of the Principal Investigator (PI) who submitted the originalgrant proposal to the National Science Foundation (NSF) and received the CAREER grant inwhich this work is situated; and four graduate students
. The U.S.West Point Academy was selected to include populations of students seeking professional military careersand supported by curriculum experiences formalizing learning in many professional skills such asteamwork and leadership. The University of Tennessee Knoxville population includes students pursuingcivil engineering careers and experiencing fewer structured learning experiences in typical professionalskills topics. The data collected shows positive student perceptions towards project-based learningcourses which supports this pedagogy as applicable in training trusted professionals. Some variationswere observed between the two populations, but general trends showed agreed positive value toprofessional skills and technical skills
ANOVA. The satisfaction scale consists of three items on a 5-pointscale ranging from 1 to 5, where 5 = very satisfied. Reflective Assignments For the 1st PBL project, students were asked to answer the following questions: ▪ Do you think what you learn is important for your professional career? ▪ Where do you think you will be using everything you learned? ▪ How would you explain the project and your contribution to the project in a job interview? ▪ How would you explain how your strengths helped you contribute to the project in a job interview? ▪ How would you explain in a job interview how your weaknesses affected your ability to
, appropriateness, value, and economic impact an invention can have on a user or a 3INVENTION EDUCATION: POSITIONING YOUTH AS AGENTS OF CHANGE community. This is extremely important when considering a “bring-to-market” business plan an inventor could follow to patent, market, and distribute their invention. There are a growing number of invention educators designing IvE experiences to supportyouth engagement in STEM. Many of these experiences focus on advancing innovation andentrepreneurship, 21st-century skills, improving youth self-efficacy, STEM career awareness,and increasing standardized math and science scores (Couch et al., 2019
developed codebook that shows the salient themes that emerged from our collected data isshown in Table 6, which includes the applied codes, definitions of these codes, and code countsfor each of the respective years.Table 6 - Codebook and frequency of relevant codesCode Definition Example Quote 2019 2020 2021Major Participants shared that they “It helped me develop a better 3 2 3Exploration had time to explore the understanding of what I want different majors offered by to pursue as a major and a the university College of career. I now have a better Engineering during the understanding of which
particularly appreciate engineers that can speak Spanish and/or Portuguese. Have at least a realistic plan of where they want to be in 5 and 10 years, especially if they plan to stay on the technical side or want to move into management; this does not mean a candidate is locked into a particular career path, but they at least have a plan (which can change based on circumstances). It may not be “cool” to go to your professor for help, but it is a very good idea to meet up with coworkers/management. Students are not typically expected to spend time in other departments to learn what they do, but in the professional world it is imperative that engineers know what other groups are doing around
, focusing on the ways in which industry influence affectsstudent experiential opportunities, student competencies, financial support, and futureopportunities.V. Features of productive industry involvement in engineering technology programsIndustry advisory boards can influence the creation, implementation, and sustainment of anengineering technology program through several factors that promote highly skilled graduatesready to be hired by industry. In the following sections, we analyze the particular ways in whichthe IAB can support students’ career readiness and the educational institution.Experiential learning opportunitiesHigh industry involvement in experiential learning opportunities gives students a chance to seewhat it is like to work in
identity and create afeeling of authenticity in the field.Introduction and Literature ReviewThe benefits of engineering internships to students have been well established in literature [6],[7]. Internships provide opportunities for professional development (such as the improvement oftechnical and communication skills) as well as a look into what a career in engineering entails[8], [9], [10]. Literature has also established the positive influence of quality mentorship onstudents and how these relationships can help retain students in their respective fields [11], [12].It has also been found that internships can impact the persistence of underrepresented groups inengineering [13], [14]. Engineering workplace cultures are frequently male dominated
and a group research project.The GCSP and the EYE program cover the cost for this DCC certification for all active scholars.e. Social ConsciousnessThe social consciousness component involves scholars with service-learning and K-12 outreachprograms to better prepare our students to be contributing citizens locally, nationally, and/orglobally. Many students enter college wanting to pursue a career to serve others and seeengineering careers as altruistic in nature [6]. To develop and deepen scholars’ social awarenessand demonstrate motivation to bring technical engineering experiences to bear on societalproblems, each scholar takes advantage of opportunities provided by service learningorganizations. An example could be volunteering with the
Paper ID #38084STUDENT PAPER: What We Learned, When We LearnedIt, and How We Learned It: Takeaways from an Institution’sAerospace Engineering Capstone ExperienceClaire Schuessler Claire Schuessler is a Master of Science in Engineering student with an Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering concentration at Saint Louis University's Parks College of Engineering, Aviation, and Technology. She also has a BS in Aerospace Engineering with a minor in Engineering Mathematics from SLU, and she is a member of SWE and AIAA. She will be beginning her career as a Systems Engineer for Raytheon Intelligence & Space.Samantha
Engineering and an M.S. degree in Industrial Engineering from Jordan University of Science and Technology (JUST) in 2005 and 2007, respectively. He received his M.Eng. degree in Industrial Engineering/Human Factors and Ergonomics and a Ph.D. degree in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from The Pennsylvania State University (PSU) in 2010 and 2012, respectively. Dr. Ashour was the inaugural recipient of William and Wendy Korb Early Career Professorship in Industrial Engineering in 2016. Dr. Ashour’s research areas include data-driven decision-making, modeling and simulation, data analytics, immersive technologies, and process improvement. He contributed to research directed to improve design and engineering
development as engineers. In this co-op based program,students gain experiences that will help prepare them for careers in engineering after graduation.Cooperative (co-op) experiences have been shown to prepare work-ready graduates, withevidence that students with co-op experiences are more likely to get full time employment aftergraduation and with higher starting salaries [8]. However, co-op experiences have been shown tohave the potential of adding to the psychological distress of students [9], reducing overallwellbeing. With co-op experience being a valuable tool for gaining and applying engineeringknowledge, identifying ways to support students thriving while on co-op is important.Programmatic Context. We explore student thriving at the Iron
students areforced to identify the appropriate stakeholders, interview these stakeholders, and analyze theproblem from the stakeholders’ points of view. Another approach was taken by Korach andGargac [8] where they re-vamped first-year curriculum by incorporating active learning exercisesinto the existing curriculum. Korach and Gargac [8] found that both instructors and studentsbenefited from the addition of entrepreneurial mindset activities. Instructors found the activitiesbetter engaged students in the course and generated excitement around the engineering field whilethe students developed beneficial skills for a successful career. There is no one size-fits allapproach to re-vamping and incorporating innovative thinking into curricula, but the