Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Mirth, St. Cloud State University

: Issues and observations”, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 21(5), 341–347, 2009.[6] Bhatia N, Drew J. “Applying lean production to the public sector”. The McKinsey Quarterly, Jul;3(1):97-8, 2006.[7] Robinson M, Yorkstone S., “Becoming a lean university: The case of the University of St Andrews”. Leadership and Governance in Higher Education: Handbook for Decision- Makers and Administrators. 2014.[8] Langer, Tobias, Lean University, 2012.[9] Thirkell, E. and Ashman, I., “Lean towards learning: connecting Lean Thinking and human resource management in UK higher education”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(21), pp.2957-2977, 2014.[10] Barton, H. and Yazdani

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Holly Golecki, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Sara Lamer, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Elizabeth McNeela, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Thomas Tran, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Aasiyah Adnan, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

-PEER), vol. 9, no. 2, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.7771/2157-9288.1244.[5] S. Y. Yoon, M. Dyehouse, A. M. Lucietto, H. A. Diefes-Dux, and B. M. Capobianco, “The Effects of Integrated Science, Technology, and Engineering Education on Elementary Students’ Knowledge and Identity Development: Effects of Integrated STEM Education on Students,” Sch Sci Math, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 380–391, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1111/ssm.12090.[6] R. L. Dodge and A. F. Rodriguez, “Expanding Science And Engineering Outreach Programs Through Cooperation With The Girl Scout Council In El Paso, Texas,” in 1998 Annual Conference Proceedings, Seattle, Washington, Jun. 1998, p. 3.273.1-3.273.4. doi: 10.18260/1-2--7114.[7] S. Kim, C. Laschi, and B. Trimmer, “Soft robotics

Conference Session

PCEE Session 12: STEM, Technology, and Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Wilson-Lopez, Utah State University - Engineering Education; Jennifer Taylor, University of Colorado Boulder; Ivonne Santiago, University of Texas at El Paso

. Prism, 31(3), 17. 811 Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, Cl L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L.(2018). Report of 2018 National Survey of Science and Mathematics Education (NSSME+).Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research Inc.12 Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.13 Kruidenier, D., & Morrison, S. (2013). Avoid the banking model in social and environmentaljustice education: Interrogate the tensions. Educational Studies, 49, 430-442. DOI:10.1080/00131946.2013.82580314 Kennelly, J. (2011). Citizen youth: Culture, activism, and agency in a neoliberal era. NewYork: Palgrave McMillan.15 Saldaña

Conference Session

Technological and Engineering Literacy - Philosophy of Engineering Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Banglong Liang; Haojing Chang

cultivating top-notch innovative talents.However, the extracurricular learning system needs further pilot verification to better balancethe improvement of scientific research literacy and the pressure on students’ curriculum.References[1] H. Heo, K.Y. Lim, and Y. Kim, “Exploratory study on the patterns of online interaction and knowledge co-construction in project-based learning.” Computers & Education, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1383-1392, 2010.[2] D.Drinka, and M. Y. M. Yen, “A Project-Centric Curriculum Design.” College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 25-34, 2006.[3] R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Chemical Engineering Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Konstantinos Apostolou, McMaster University; Amin Rajabzadeh, McMaster University

: https://en.unesco.org/themes/building-knowledge-societies/oer. [Accessed 2022].[2] D. Wiley, "Defining the "Open" in Open Content and Open Educational Resources," [Online]. Available: http://opencontent.org/definition/.. [Accessed 2022].[3] Creative Commons, "About the Licenses," [Online]. Available: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/. [Accessed 2022].[4] T. J. Bliss and M. Smith, "A Brief History of Open Educational Resources," in Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science, R. S. Jhangiani and R. Biswas-Diener, Eds., London, Ubiquity Press, 2017, pp. 9-27.[5] O. M. Belikov and R. Bodily, "Incentives and barriers to OER adoption:," Open Praxis,, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 235-246, 2016.[6] M. T

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alan Cheville, Bucknell University; Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY; Rebecca Thomas, Bucknell University; Stewart Thomas, Bucknell University; Robert Nickel; Stu Thompson, Bucknell University

supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.EEC-2022271. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation.References[1] National Science Foundation, “IUSE/Professional Formation of Engineers: Revolutionizing engineering and computer science Departments (IUSE/PFE: RED),” vol. 2017, no. May 15d. 2017.[2] D. Kotys-Schwartz, D. Knight, and G. Pawlas, “First-Year and Capstone Design Projects: Is the Bookend Curriculum Approach Effective for Skill Gain,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition. Louisville, KY, 2010.[3] B. Akbar, J. L. Brummet, S

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Julie Martin, The Ohio State University; Chiebuka Egwuonwu, The Ohio State University; Isabel Miller, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

speakers Sheri Sheppard,Sara Atwood, Elif Miskioğlu, Adam Carberry, Kaela Martin, Kelly Cross, Nicole Pitterson,Idalis Villanueva Alarcón, Rachel Kajfez, Marie Paretti, Sarah Zappe, Holly Matusovich, BrianHelmke, Maura Borrego, and Paul Gannon for sharing their expertise with the VCoP. Finally, weappreciate the VCoP members who participated and provided valuable feedback.References[1] A. L. Pawley, A. R. Carberry, M. E. Cardella, M.-I. Carnasciali, S. R. Daly, J. L. Gorlewicz, G. L. Herman, M. M. Hynes, S. S. Jordan and N. N. Kellam, "The PEER Collaborative: Supporting engineering education research faculty with near-peer mentoring unconference workshops,” presented at the 121st American Society for Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Eileen Johnson, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Joseph Mirabelli, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Sara Vohra

advisory board members Jennifer Cromley, AllisonGodwin, and Nicola Sochacka for feedback on the research design and analysis. The authors alsothank the students for participating in the survey.References[1] A. Danowitz and K. Beddoes, "Effects of COVID-19 on Engineering Students’ Baseline Stress," in Proceedings of the AAEE2020 Conference, 2020.[2] S. K. Lipson, S. Zhou, B. Wagner III, K. Beck, and D. Eisenberg, "Major differences: Variations in undergraduate and graduate student mental health and treatment utilization across academic disciplines," Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, vol. 30, pp. 23- 41, 2016.[3] K. Jensen, S. R. Vohra, J. F. Mirabelli, A. J. Kunze, I. Miller, and T. E. Romanchek

Conference Session

LEES 4: Understanding and Disrupting Engineering Cultures

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Radoff, University of Maryland College Park; Chandra Turpen, University of Maryland College Park; Fatima Abdurrahman, University of Maryland College Park; Danjing Chen, University of Maryland College Park; David Tomblin, University of Maryland College Park; Amol Agrawal; Sona Chudamani

set of data with the question,“How is our imagination being constrained by current social structures in society and when doesit break free from these narrow constructions of engineering practice?” From the set of twelveinterviews, we selected two FG interviews for closer analysis, which had evidence of both“narrow” and “expansive” reasoning. These focus groups were: Malik, Serena, Molly, & Joanna(M+S+M+J) and Dustin & Harveen (D+H) (all pseudonyms). Within these FG interviews, ourco-authoring team collaboratively identified candidate focal segments that: (a) exhibited highly“narrow” design thinking where implicit assumptions about the status quo were dominating theimagination, and (b) exhibited more “expansive” or liberatory design

Conference Session

Engineering Technology Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Carmen Cioc, University of Toledo; Noela A Haughton, University of Toledo; Sorin Cioc

Tagged Divisions

Engineering Technology Division

Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Combining Problem-Based Learning with the KEEN ‘s Framework for Entrepreneurially Minded Learning in a Fluid Mechanics Course: Pilot ImplementationAbstractThis paper describes the implementation and the results of problem-based learning (PBL)pedagogy infused with the Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network’s 3C’s in a senior levelAdvanced Fluid Mechanics course within the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET)program. The work, a close collaboration between engineering and education faculty, aligns withthe New Research Areas (National Engineering Education Research Colloquies 2006), ABETCriteria for

Conference Session

ERM: Lessons Learned from COVID (COVID Part 2)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gianluca Guadagni, University of Virginia; Deepyaman Maiti, University of Virginia; Farzad Shafiei Dizaji, University of Virginia

February 2022).[6] U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR)’s June 2021 report “Education in aPandemic: The Disparate Impacts of COVID-19 on America’s Students”. Available at:https://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/20210608-impacts-of-covid19.pdf (Accessed: 10February 2022).[7] Faulkner, B., Earl, K. and Herman, G. (2019) ‘Mathematical Maturity for Engineering Students’,International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 5(1), pp. 97–128.doi:10.1007/s40753-019-00083-8.[8] Zavala, G., & Dominguez, A. (2016, June), ‘Engineering Students' Perception of Relevance ofPhysics and Mathematics’ Paper presented at 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, NewOrleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.26664. doi

Conference Session

Joint Session: Entrepreneurially-Minded Learning in the Classroom

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Timo Bunk, Stanford University; Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Helen Chen, Stanford University

something successful at the end.”(I18M, Pos. 19).4.2.4 Fellow Students Proposition 2.4: ME218 attracts highly motivated and talented students and creates an environment where friendship and partnership flourish.Ten interviewees emphasize the connections and the quality of their ME218 classmates. “EdCarryer will tell you on day one: ‘This is hard, and we will take up your whole life for thisyear.’” (I12M, Pos. 29). Thereby he creates that feeling that the students “[…] are all in theMarines together […]” (I15M, Pos. 22). The preselection process at Stanford University andME218’s image leads to the situation that “[…] the people around you are phenomenal.” (I01M,Pos. 34).During ME218, students collaborate closely and spend much time together. Their

Conference Session

Inclusivity at Two Year Colleges

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Yowell, University of Colorado Boulder; Gabe Hanzel-Sello; Gary Barnak, Saddleback College; Michael Venn, Community College of Baltimore County

material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos.(HRD 1834628 and HRD 1834608). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] NASEM, "Expanding underrepresented minority participation: America’s Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads," National Academy of Engineering, Washington, 2018.[2] X. Y. and R. Larson, "STEM crisis or STEM surplus? Yes, and yes. Monthly Labor Review," 2015. [Online]. Available: http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2015/article/stem-crisis- or-stem-surplus-yes-and-yes.htm.[3] T. Dinh and Y. L. Zhang, "Engagement in

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 1: Innovative Approaches to Teaching Energy-Related Concepts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Mativo, University of Georgia; Jacob Lancaster, University of Georgia

. The solution occurs where theminimum area for heat transfer needed to provide adequate heat transfer out of the system12.6kW is achieved. Figure 1 indicates that this point occurs at approximately 0.0465m2 (72in2).Using this area, students determined the minimum volumetric flow required to provide adequatecooling is 0.69 m3/s, as shown in figure 2. Figure 1: Solution for most efficient radiator output Figure 2: Required Volumetric flow rate for given Radiator area Taking these solutions into account the team decided to add a factor of safety andincrease the total radiator area 20%. Resulting in the selection of a radiator with a 0.058 m2 (90in2) cross section for the final design and a fan that has

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Victor Garcia; Peter Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Diane Golding, University of Texas at El Paso; Irma Torres-Catanach; Nora Cuvelier, University of Texas at El Paso; Crystal Cholewa; Karla Ayala Mendoza

Conference Session

Mechanical Engineering: Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Muhammad Rahman, Wichita State University

://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/what-is-project-management[2] Accessed Feb. 6, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.pmi.org/about/learn-about-pmi/who-are-project-managers[3] Accessed Feb. 5, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.usability.gov/what-and-why/project-management.html[4] Accessed Feb. 13, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/project-manager-qualities[5] S. M. Shariff et al., "Assessment of Project Management Skills and Learning Outcomes inStudents’ Projects," in 6th International Conference on University Learning and Teaching(InCULT 2012), Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 90 (2013) pp. 745 – 754.[6] P. N. Mustaro and R. Rossi, “Project Management Principles Applied in Academic

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James Huff, Harding University; Amy Brooks, Oregon State University

in thismaterial are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NationalScience Foundation. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the anonymous reviewersfor their constructive feedback that helped us to improve this paper. Lastly, we thank the studyparticipants themselves for allowing us to learn important insights from their lived experiencesof shame in the context of engineering.References[1] J. P. Tangney and R. L. Dearing, Shame and guilt. Guilford Press, 2003.[2] J. L. Huff, B. Okai, K. Shanachilubwa, N. W. Sochacka, and J. Walther, “Unpacking professional shame: Patterns of White male engineering students living in and out of threats to their identities,” Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amy Chan Hilton, University of Southern Indiana; Shelly Blunt, University of Southern Indiana; Zane Mitchell, University of Southern Indiana

Undergraduate Education (EHR/DUE) and Division of Engineering Education and Centers (ENG/EEC), where she worked in multiple STEM education and research programs, including the IUSE, TUES, STEP, WIDER, S-STEM, Noyce, REU, and ERC. She also served as Associate Chair and was on the faculty in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at the Florida A&M University-Florida State University College of Engineering.Shelly B. Blunt (Associate Provost for Academic Affairs) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Capacity-Building to Transform STEM Education Through Faculty Communities in Learning Analytics and

Conference Session

Faculty Development Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah Zappe, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Sam Spiegel, Colorado School of Mines; Deb Jordan, Colorado School of Mines; Megan Sanders, Colorado School of Mines

as they are also at a point of transition to a new Director. Formore information about the evaluation, please feel free to contact the author team.References:Jordan, D., Spiegel, S., Sanders, M., Cutler, S., & Zappe, S. (2022). Lessons Learned: Findingsfrom an External Evaluation of a STEM Teaching and Learning Center (Lessons Learned Paper#2 of 2). American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition,Minneapolis, MN.POD Network (2018). Defining what matters: Guidelines for comprehensive center for teachingand learning (CTL) evaluation.https://podnetwork.org/content/uploads/POD_CTL_Evaluation_Guidelines__2018_.pdf 5Appendix 1. 6

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Michelle Jarvie-Eggart, Michigan Technological University; Alfred Owusu-Ansah, Michigan Technological University; Shari Stockero

,” MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.[2]​​V. Vankatesh, and F. Davis, (2000). ”A Theoretical Extension of the Technology AcceptanceModel: Four longitudinal field studies,” Management Science, 46(2), 186.[3] J. Case, and G. Light, (2014). Framing Qualitative Methods in Engineering EducationResearch. In A. Johri and B. Olds (Eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Engineering EducationResearch (pp. 535-550). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.doi:10.1017/CBO9781139013451.034.[4] Vedel, J. Ramaprasad, and L. Lapointe, “Social Media Strategies for Health Promotion byNonprofit Organizations: Multiple Case Study Design,” J Med Internet Res, vol. 22, no. 4, p.e15586, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.2196/15586.[5] M. Jarvie-Eggart, A. Owusu-Ansah, and S. L. Stockero, “Factors

Conference Session

Imagining the Research Agenda for ASEE LEAD

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Meagan Kendall, University of Texas at El Paso; Meg Handley, Pennsylvania State University; Brian Novoselich, United States Military Academy; Matthew Dabkowski

and experiences to develop student's leadership and other professional Experiences skills [41] 3 Undergraduate Coaching Developing the engineering leadership of undergraduate students through coaching [42] 7 Diverse Student Workshops Workshop-based co-curricular EL development for diverse student populations [43] Out-of-class 2 SHPE Social-cognitive Society of Hispanic Professional Engineers (SHPE)'s Social-cognitive leadership theory [44] experiences Leadership Theory 2 International Experience International project-work/experiences for undergraduate students [45

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tracy Hammond, Texas A&M University; Kerrie Douglas, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Vimal Viswanathan, San Jose State University; Vinayak Krishnamurthy; Hillary Merzdorf, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Morgan Weaver, Georgia Institute of Technology; Wayne Li, Georgia Institute of Technology

ASEE Chester F. Carlson Award, the 2020 TEES Faculty Fellows Award, and the 2011 Charles H. Barclay, Jr. '45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. She has also been recently appointed as the Speaker-Elect of the Faculty Senate. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu.Julie S Linsey (Professor) Georgia Tech © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Sketchtivity, an Intelligent Sketch Tutoring Software: Broadening

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Aileen Huang-Saad, Northeastern University; Aida Lopez Ruiz, New Jersey Institute of Technology; Jacqueline Handley, University of Michigan

, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 163–166, 2013, doi:10.1002/sce.21032.[3] K. P. Cross, Adults as Learners. Increasing participation and facilitating learning. 1981.[4] P. Shekhar and A. Huang-Saad, “Examining engineering students’ participation inentrepreneurship education programs: implications for practice,” IJ STEM Ed, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 40, Jun.2021, doi: 10.1186/s40594-021-00298-9.[5] P. Shekhar, A. H. Saad, and J. Libarkin, “Understanding student participation in entrepreneurshipeducation programs: a critical review,” The International journal of engineering education, vol. 34, no. 3,pp. 1060–1072, 2018.[6] S. Harding, Objectivity and Diversity. 2015. Accessed: Oct. 02, 2016. [Online]. Available:http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books

Conference Session

ETD - A Technology Potpourri II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samia Afrin, East Tennessee State University; Christopher Hudson, East Tennessee State University

housed within safety and health of industry. Since 1990’s, theconcept of ergonomic awareness became discernible within enterprises. The continuous researchhas yielded to a certain level of knowledge about how to improve product quality and productivity.Workers safety and benefits of process improvements are now widely acknowledged in industry[1] [2]. Meanwhile, the application of ergonomic process is very limited in household sector. Theword “housekeeping” has demonstrated as better technique that affect industrial quest forcontinuous improvement by eliminating of waste in a cluttered area [3]. Later, the housekeepingconcept turned out to be as 5S program.Main framework of 5S program was first proposed by Osada in 1991 [4] and then Hirano in1995

Conference Session

Engineering Libraries Division Technical Session 3: Technology

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ryan Barlow, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; Adrian Rodriguez, University of Texas at Austin; Oscar Rios, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand; James Eakins, zyBooks, A Wiley Brand

describing certain types of visualelements, such as phase diagrams and phase transformation plots in materials science andengineering, T-s, h-s, and P-v diagrams in thermodynamics, output response plots in controlsystems, as well as other common visual elements in mechanical engineering courses; and (4)Writing text for animated visual elements that describe in detail all dynamic processes andmovements in the animation. This paper describes our guidelines in detail, and presentsexamples from three different zyVersions used in mechanical engineering courses. Thesestandards can be modified for use across various engineering disciplines and will enable authorsof online content to provide higher quality material that meets accessibility

Conference Session

Utilizing Technology to Train Chemical Engineering Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Liberatore, The University of Toledo; Uchenna Asogwa, The University of Toledo

capturing video, the team developed themes of each video and created scripts andvisuals. Scripts included on-camera dialogue that presenters usually read like a news anchor.Scripts were kept simple with concise sentences for easy flow of information. Scripts included anintroduction and a body. The introduction was generally less than 1 minute to introduce thepresenter(s) and give audience a high-level objective of topic presented. The body consisteddetailed text and references to visuals and any drawing on the tablet.To align with attention spans of humans, engage a wide audience, and communicate effectively,each video was kept as short as possible with a goal of between 5 to 7 minutes. After videos wererecorded, the software application iMovie

Conference Session

Multidisciplinary Engineering Division Technical Session - Empathy, Metacognitive Skills, and Perceptions of Success

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Stephanie Lunn, Georgia Institute of Technology; Cristi Bell-Huff, Georgia Institute of Technology

, itinvolves the visualization and recreation of mental images that are shared with listeners through adynamic interplay of verbal and non-verbal communication from both the speaker and listener(s).In the context of pedagogy, storytelling has been shown to encourage self-awareness [23],enhance professional development [24, 25], and cultivate empathy [26, 27].3 Our ApproachLegacy refers to the value we create for other people and places in the world. The story of aperson’s life reflects their legacy. In the Exploring LegaCs experience, we met for weekly, virtualmeetings to learn about effective storytelling, to share personal experiences, and to consider thelegacy that engineering students want to leave. The design of the Exploring LegaCs program

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiffani Williams, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Yael Gertner, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Nancy Amato, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Adrienne Gulley, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Jancie Harris, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign; Mahesh Viswanathan, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign

students had little to no prior experience in computing,they have made a smooth transition into graduate school and secured full-time employment inthe tech industry.SummaryOur iCAN program is the first of its kind in the state of Illinois from a large public university.Our graduate certificate in computing fundamentals provides a high-quality credential from aleading computer science department. Graduates of our program are prepared to pursue techcareers in industry or pursue a full graduate degree in computer science. Thus, our programbrings together non-computing college graduates from diverse areas of expertise andbackgrounds in an accelerated graduate certificate program that broadens participation incomputing.References[1] A. Ivey, S. R

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Ethics Education Assessment

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Green, LeTourneau University; David Dittenber, Cedarville University

similarpurpose to institutional honor codes (and will fully align with existing institutional policies) butwould have the advantage of being more clearly related to the opportunities and challengesassociated with engineering education. Student and faculty perceptions of these new codes ofethics will be assessed and reported.Additionally, given the similar nature of the two universities included in this preliminary study,further research in this area could be expanded to include different types of institutions withmore varied contexts.AcknowledgmentsAny opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper are those ofthe author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of their institutions. The authors thank thestudents and

Conference Session

Biomedical Engineering Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sabia Abidi, Rice University; Renata Ramos, Rice University; Laurel Chen, Rice University; Victoria Kong; Aidan McAnena, Rice University

audience interested in the field of bioengineering. Afterwatching these student-produced videos, new students can assess their own understanding andperception of learning via suggested questions and surveys. This approach, namely the use ofvideo medium and student voice, has the potential to benefit both the creator and consumer ofthe videos, specifically in communication skills and understanding of courses.References Cited[1] D. Zhang, L. Zhou, R. O. Briggs, and J. F. Nunamaker, “Instructional video in e-learning:Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness,” Information &Management, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 15–27, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.01.004.[2] D. S. Kreiner, “Guided Notes and Interactive Methods for