Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - Innovative Teaching Strategies II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Matthew Alexander, Texas A&M University - Kingsville; NAZMUL RAHMANI, Texas A&M University - Kingsville

helpful for expanding this work to a more complete survey of faculty thatfit this category, including Hispanic faculty at Hispanic-serving institutions.References[1] C. Carrigan, Riskin, E. A., O'Leary, K., Yen, J., Mody-Pan, P.N., O'Donnell, M., "On- Ramping to Academia: Women’s Experiences of Transitioning from Nonacademic to Academic Careers," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2015, 11492.[2] S. Parks, Dietz, L., "Mid-Career Change: Benefits and challenges of leaving industry for academia," presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2017, Conference Paper ID # 18302.[3] S. Fleishman, Braun, J., "Caution! Rough Road Ahead – the Transition from Industry Professional

Conference Session

PCEE Session 11: Engineering Outreach / Summer Programs

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joanna Skluzacek, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Eric Severson, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Nathan Petersen, University of Wisconsin - Madison; Martin Johnson, University of Wisconsin - Madison

has worked at the University of Wisconsin since 2010.Eric Loren Severson Eric L Severson (S'09-M'15) received the B.Sc. and PhD degrees in electrical engineering from the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA in 2008 and 2015, respectively where he also worked as a post doctoral associate through 2016. He is currently an assistant professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Dr. Severson is an associate director of the Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium (WEMPEC) and fellow of the Grainger Institute for Engineering. His research interests include design and control of electric machines and power electronics, with focus areas in magnetic bearings, bearingless motors, flywheel energy

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 2: Instruction & Learning Delivery

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Naman Gulati, University of Toronto; Angy Higgy, University of Toronto; Hamid Timorabadi, University of Toronto

Paper ID #36757Work In Progress: CodeCapture: A Tool to Attain Insightinto the Programming Development ProcessNaman GulatiAngy HiggyHamid S Timorabadi (Assistant Professor, Teaching Stream) Hamid Timorabadi received his BSc, MASc, and PhD degrees in Electrical Engineering from the University of Toronto. He has worked as a project, design, and test engineer as well as a consultant to industry. His research interests include the application of digital signal processing in energy systems and computer networks. He also has deep interest in engineering education and the use of technology to advance the learning

Conference Session

Engineering Ethics Division: Computing, Technology, and AI

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kerrie Hooper, Florida International University; Trina Fletcher, Florida International University

influences people’s ethicalbeliefs and considerations. Another interesting topic in ethics is human flourishing theories. Terrell Bynum first coined the termflourishing ethics in 2006. Since then, many researchers have been applying flourishing ethics as theirparadigm for AI ethics. In Stahl (2020) ’s book, he stated, ”The central thesis of this book is thatflourishing ethics can enlighten AI ethics and guide the development of practical interventions. Anotherexample is Reiss (2021), in his paper on the use of AI education, who argued that education shouldsupport human flourishing, which will widen to non-human surroundings since it benefits humans too.There are two general categories of Flourishing Ethics (FE) –1. Human-Centered Flourishing

Conference Session

DEED Technical Session 7 Design Mental Frameworks

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jarod White, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

, another can be optimized, and the third area is necessarily unbounded. Design Triad There is a further balance between engineering, design and product. The engineering considerations are about feasibility; is it possible to make, how is it built? The design part is focused on the customer experience. The product aspect is keyed to the need/s addressed. While many engineering courses in innovation and entrepreneurship focus on business (and in some cases, human) values, students should also be given opportunities to develop deep technical expertise. There is another balance between feasibility (engineering), viability (business) However

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 13: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #2

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian O'Connell, Northeastern University

Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education, 2009, pp. 337-341.[3] J.-I. Choi and M. Hannafin, "Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design," Educational technology research and development, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 53-69, 1995.[4] C. F. Quigley and D. Herro, An educator's guide to steam: Engaging students using real- world problems. Teachers College Press, 2019.[5] K. Cennamo and D. Kalk, Real world instructional design: An iterative approach to designing learning experiences. Routledge, 2019.[6] B. Giddens and C. Stasz, "Context Matters: Teaching and Learning Skills for Work," Centerpoint, 1999.[7] S. Avargil, O

Conference Session

LEAD Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Nagel, James Madison University; Kyle Gipson, James Madison University; Matthew Caulfield, James Madison University

(2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02579-x. [6] Oglensky, B. (2008). The Ambivalent Dynamics of Loyalty in Mentorship. Retrieved from SAGE Open Journal: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0018726708089000. [7] Eller, L. S., Lev, E. L., & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: a qualitative study. Nurse education today, 34(5), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.020. [8] Lunenburg, F. (2010) From Safe Spaces to Brave Spaces. Formal Communication Channels: Upward, Downward, Horizontal, and External. Retrieved from Focus on Colleges, Universities, and Schools: http://www.nationalforum.com/Electronic%20Journal%20Volumes/Lunenburg%2C%20Fre d%20C%2C

Conference Session

Social Identities and STEM Experiences: Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Austin Peters, University of San Diego; Susan Lord, University of San Diego

Exposition 2016: New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 26-29 June 2016.[5] S. R. Burckhard and J. Kant, The PEEC experiment: Native Hawaiian and Native American Engineering Education. Brookings, SD: Jerome J. Lohr College of Engineering, South Dakota State University, 2016.[6] “The Mālama Honua Worldwide Voyage,” Hōkūleʻa, 20-Aug-2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.hokulea.com/worldwide-voyage/. [Accessed: 18-Feb-2022].[7] F. S. Allaire, “Navigating uncharted waters: First-generation Native Hawaiian College students in STEM,” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 305–325, 2017.[8] T. T. Nguyen, O. Francis, S. Miller, D. Kuehu, K. McLean, J. L. Irvine, and N

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa Higgins, Boston Children's Museum; Michelle Cerrone

. References [1] L.S. Vygotsky, L. Semenovich, and M. Cole, Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978. [2] Z. Aguirre-Muñoz and M. L. Pantoya, M. L. “Engineering Literacy and Engagement in Kindergarten Classrooms.” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 630-654, 2016. [3] D. Bairaktarova, D. Evangelou, A. Bagiati, and S. Brophy. “Early Engineering in Young Children’s Exploratory Play with Tangible Materials.” Youth and Environments, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 212-235, 2011. [4] J. Blank and S. Lynch. “Growing in STEM. The Design Process

Conference Session

Graduate Studies Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kacey Beddoes, San Jose State University; Sarah Grajdura, University of California, Davis

Students and Implications for Persistence and Well-Being,” J. High. Educ., vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 988– 1013, 2018.[8] J. Beckmann, “Gendered career expectations in context: the relevance of normative and comparative reference groups,” Br. J. Sociol. Educ., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 968–988, 2021.[9] D. Bonner and M. C. Dorneich, “Increasing female middle school student interest in stem: Requirements for game-based learning applications,” Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 133–146, 2021.[10] S. L. Eddy and S. E. Brownell, “Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines,” Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 1–20, 2016

Conference Session

Educational Research and Methods (ERM) Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Isabella Stuopis, Tufts University; Kristen Wendell, Tufts University

and Instruction. Theauthors would like to thank all of the learning assistants who participated in the research.References[1] Y. Cao, C. Smith, B. D. Lutz, and M. Koretsky, “Cultivating the next generation: Outcomes from a Learning Assistant program in engineering,” presented at the 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2018. Accessed: Oct. 24, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/cultivating-the-next-generation-outcomes-from-a-learning-assistant- program-in-engineering[2] V. Otero, S. Pollock, and N. Finkelstein, “A physics department’s role in preparing physics teachers: The Colorado learning assistant model,” American Journal of Physics, vol. 78, no. 11, pp. 1218–1224, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1119

Conference Session

Statics and Dynamics Topics

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Amir Yazdi, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Shraddha Sangelkar, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Eric Constans, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Joseph Lahmann, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Bryson Halsey, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

, werecommend that the projection method be considered for adoption by instructors who teach fourbarlinkage analysis to undergraduate students.References[1] A. Cayley, "On Three-bar Motion," Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. VII, pp. 136-166, 1876.[2] S. Roberts, "On Three-bar Motion in Plane Space," Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, vol. VII, pp. 14-23, 1875.[3] C. W. Wampler, "Solving the Kinematics of Planar Mechanisms," Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 387-391, 1999.[4] R. Norton, Design of Machinery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2012.[5] K. J. Waldron and G. L. Kinzel, Kinematics, Dynamics and Design of Machinery. Wiley, 2004.[6] G. H. Martin, Kinematics and Dynamics

Conference Session

NSF Grantees Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Fogarty, California State University, Sacramento; Robin Altman, California State University, Sacramento; Jennifer Lundmark

with theimportance of student leadership development, many faculty in the workshop expressed barrierssurrounding their ability to actively support that development. Figure 4 shows that the workshopreduced all but one of those identified barriers. After the workshop, faculty concerns wereprimarily focused on student resistance and not having enough time as opposed to not knowinghow to support student leadership development which was the most frequently cited barrieralong with not enough time in the pre-workshop survey. When you think about fostering student leadership development, which factor(s) make engaging with this process feel uncomfortable or too challenging

Conference Session

Project Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tumkor Serdar, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown; William Fetrow, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown

., Predicting the Effects of Dimensional and Material PropertyVariations in Micro Compliant Mechanisms, M.S., Brigham Young University, 2001.[3] Subaşı, Levent. Synthesis of compliant bistable four-link mechanisms for two positions. MSthesis. 2005.[4] Howell, Larry L., Compliant Mechanisms, John Wiley & Sons Inc., 2001[5] Farhadi Machekposhti, D., Tolou, N., & Herder, J. L. (2015). A review on compliant jointsand rigid-body constant velocity universal joints toward the design of compliant homokineticcouplings. Journal of Mechanical Design, 137(3), 032301.[6] Pham, M. T., Teo, T. J., & Yeo, S. H. (2016). Investigation of the Mechanical Properties of3D Printed Compliant Mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference onProgress

Conference Session

Design Experiences in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Katie Basinger, University of Florida; Benjamin Elgan, University of Florida; Sean Niemi, University of Florida

continuous improvement efforts in the Spring 2022 semester. Surveysare deployed after each assignment and will be evaluated in a similar manner to the work inprogress presented here. We will also evaluate for statistical differences in the groups based onthe changes made to the course in Spring 2022. We will continue to identify ways to improvestudents' learning experience in the experiential CNC course. The team plans to submit a fullpaper to the Manufacturing Division in 2023.References [1] S. A. Ambrose, M. W. Brideges, M. DiPietro, M. C. Lovett, M. K. Norman, How Learning Works, Jossey-Bass: Wiley, 2010, [E-book] https://firstliteracy.org/wp- content/uploads/2015/07/How-Learning-Works.pdf [2] J. D. Vermunt, “The regulation of

Conference Session

Environmental Engineering Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Joe Moore, Carnegie Mellon University; Cheyu Lin, Carnegie Mellon University; Katherine Flanigan, Carnegie Mellon University

they: gained both greater understanding ofsmart cities and appreciation for the relevance of coding, sensing, and data analysis to Civil andEnvironmental Engineering contexts; and they improved their abilities to analyze data, integratesensing, and make data-informed decisions.Works CitedAkhter, F., Khadivizand, S., Siddiquei, H. R., Alahi, M. E. E., & Mukhopadhyay, S. (2019). IoT Enabled Intelligent Sensor Node for Smart City: Pedestrian Counting and Ambient Monitoring. Sensors 2019, Vol. 19, Page 3374, 19(15), 3374. https://doi.org/10.3390/S19153374Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart Cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance, and Initiatives. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10630732.2014.942092, 22(1), 3

Conference Session

ECE Division Technical Session 4: Student-centered Learning and Teaching Methodologies

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alex Phan, University of California, San Diego; Huihui Qi, University of California, San Diego

explain their thought process [4,5]. In utilizing the “think aloud''method, students have the opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge of the topic or concept.Their ability to answer the question(s) in a complete manner is assessed using a predeterminedrubric. Examiners may provide hints, delve deeper into a particular aspect, and dynamicallyadjust questions to facilitate further discussion. This is in stark contrast to the traditional writtenexamination in which students are given fixed questions on a written test in which they wouldread thoroughly and write their answers on paper [5]. While oral examinations have been widelyadopted as an alternative form of assessment to traditional written examinations, they are notcommonly implemented in

Conference Session

WIED: Analysis, Challenges, Success, and Impacts

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori Houghtalen, Abilene Christian University; Timothy Kennedy, Abilene Christian University; Jody Jones, Abilene Christian University; M. Suzanne Clinton, University of Central Oklahoma; Kimberly Merritt, Oklahoma Christian University

Director of Engineering) Dr.Timothy J. Kennedy P.E., is the Executive Director of Engineering and an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at Abilene Christian University. His professional experience has focused on water reuse, water and wastewater treatment. Additionally, he has an interest in point of use treatment technologies for developing regions and how to better prepare students to immediately contribute to the engineering industry.Jody Jones (Assistant Professor of Finance) Jody L Jones, EdD. is an assistant professor of finance at Abilene Christian University. His teaching area(s) are financial institutions and theory. His research interests are gender equity in finance and student

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 4: Student Experience & Competencies

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brandon Chi-Thien Le, Texas A&M University; Sunay Palsole, Texas A&M University

? Benefits, Challenges,and Impact on Students”, American University, June 25, 2020, [Online] Available:https://soeonline.american.edu/blog/technology-in-education[15] H. Wu, Y. Hsu, F. Hwang, “Teachers' Adoption of Technology in Classrooms: Does SchoolSize Matter?” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6, 63-85, 2007,10.1007/s10763-006-9061-8[16] Pew Research Center, Internet/Broadband Fact Sheet, 2021 [Online]. Available:https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/[17] M. Muro, S. Liu, J. Whiton, S. Kulkarni, “Digitization and the American workforce,”Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings, November 2017, [Online][18] C. Feijao, I. Flanagan, C. Van Stolk, S. Gunashekar, “The global digital skills gap

Conference Session

Student Division Technical 1: Diversity, Equity, Inclusivity (DEI)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brenden DrInkard-Mcfarland, The Ohio State University; David Delaine; Zachary Smith, The Ohio State University

theimplementation of engineering projects, the partnership can contribute to the reciprocal,social intersection of engineering and urban gardening in an easily translational manner.References[1] R. Asomani-Boateng, “Closing the Loop: Community-Based Organic Solid Waste Recycling, Urban Gardening, and Land Use Planning in Ghana, West Africa,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 132–145, Dec. 2007, doi: 10.1177/0739456X07306392.[2] R. G. Bringle and J. A. Hatcher, “Campus–Community Partnerships: The Terms of Engagement,” Journal of Social Issues, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 503–516, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1540-4560.00273.[3] K. Lambert-Pennington, K. M. Reardon, and K. S. Robinson, “Revitalizing South

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 12: Work-in-Progress Postcard Session #1

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Corey Kiassat, PhD, MBA, PE, Quinnipiac University; Michael Ben-Avie, Quinnipiac University

, “Engineering by the numbers: ASEE retention and time-to-graduation benchmarks for undergraduate engineering schools, departments and programs,” 2016.[2] N. B. Honken and P. Ralston, “Freshman engineering retention: A holistic look,” vol. 14, no. 2, 2013.[3] C. P. Veenstra, E. L. Dey, and G. D. Herrin, “A Model for Freshman Engineering Retention.,” vol. 1, no. 3, p. n3, 2009.[4] W. D. Slanger, E. A. Berg, P. S. Fisk, and M. G. Hanson, “A longitudinal cohort study of student motivational factors related to academic success and retention using the college student inventory,” vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 278–302, 2015.[5] R. D. Robnett, P. A. Nelson, E. L. Zurbriggen, F. J. Crosby, and M. M. Chemers, “Research mentoring and scientist

Conference Session

NEE Technical Session - Innovative Teaching Strategies II

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sami Alshurafa; Laura Wieserman, University of Pittsburgh; Hanan Alhayek; Andrew Rose, University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown

communication survey. The focus was on the student academicdevelopment during the last few years of teaching at a university level. The equation containsfactors to account for additional time needed by students. Moreover, it relates the effects ofvarious personal communication styles in learning.T = (0.03 (2.5 H1 + 3.5 H2 ) + 0.11 (2 M1 + 4 M2 ) + 0.17P) ∗ S (1)Where,T: assignment time estimationH1: input time by outstanding studentH2: input time by excellent studentM1: input time by good studentM2: input time by satisfactory studentP: input time by marginal studentS:1 for either direct or systematic communication styleS:1.1 for spirited communication styleS: 1.2 for considerate communication styleT = 2.5 Tinst S

Conference Session

Energy Conversion and Conservation Technical Session 5: Strategies for Increasing Classroom Engagement

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tooran Emami, United States Coast Guard Academy

Paper ID #37106An Innovation Methodology to Increase StudentsPerformance in Hybrid Classroom and Virtual EnvironmentTooran Emami (Associate Professor) Tooran Emami is a tenured associate professor of Electrical Engineering in the Electrical Engineering Program at the U. S. Coast Guard Academy. Her research interests are in control systems, particularly Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller design, robust control, time delay, compensator design for continuous-time and discrete-time systems, analog or digital filter design, and hybrid fuel cell system design. © American

Conference Session

ERM: Engineering Identity: (Identity Part 1)

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Leyi Chen; Jiabin Zhu; Chaoqun Zheng; Zhinan Zhang

all the studentsafter they complete their first semester. Participants are freshman engineering students from a leading Chineseengineering university S. S has become a domestic first-class and internationallyrenowned university, with profound strength in science and engineering. Up to now, 7participants have been interviewed in the qualitative stage (Table 1). Table 1 Demographic information of interviewees Growth Pseudonym Gender Institute Province environment Alice F School of Mechanical

Conference Session

ERM: Mentoring for Everyone! And Let's talk about Graduate Students

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brayan Díaz, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Cesar Delgado, North Carolina State University (NCSU), Raleigh, NC; Kevin Han, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Collin Lynch, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

, ideas, and backgrounds (p. 3). Similarly, research indicates that employers recognize agap between their expectations and the skills of graduate students in engineering (Markes, 2006;Ramadi E, Ramadi S and Nasr., 2016; Saeki and Blom 2011), and recent graduates recognizethat communication skills, as well as broad analytical and technical knowledge, are important forsuccess in the professional world (Michalaka and Giogli, 2020). These policy documents, inconjunction with the perspectives of employers and students, point to the need for atransformation in teaching-learning that puts students at the center of the process and focuses ondeveloping skills essential for the workplace.To achieve this transformation in the training of engineers, a

Conference Session

Minorities in Engineering Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Deana Delp; Maria Dixon, Arizona State University

Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1-5, 2016.[3] X. Wei, J.W. Yu, P. Shattuck, M. McCracken, and J. Blackorby, “Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) participation among college students with an autism spectrum disorder,” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1539-1546, 2013.[4] A. Hillier, J. Goldstein, D. Murphy, R. Trietsch, J. Keeves, E. Mendes, and A. Queenan, “Supporting university students with autism spectrum disorder,” Autism, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 20-28, 2018.[5] K. Gobbo, and S. Shmulsky, “Faculty experience with college students with autism spectrum disorders: a qualitative study of challenges and solutions,” Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, vol

Conference Session

Mathematics Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gary Koenig, University of Virginia

) Journal,vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 126-141, 2020.[2] R. A. Abumalloh, S. Asadi, M. Nilashi, B. Minaei-Bidgoli, F. K. Nayer, S. Samad, S. Mohd,and O. Ibrahim, "The impact of coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) on education: The role ofvirtual and remote laboratories in education," Technology in Society, vol. 67, 101728, 2021.[3] L. Zetterqvist, “Statistics for chemistry students: how to make a statistics course useful byfocusing on applications,” Journal of Statistics Education, vol. 5, no. 1, 1997.[4] J. Schinske and K. Tanner, “Teaching more by grading less (or differently),” CBE—LifeSciences Education, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 159-166, 2014.[5] T. N. Docan, “Positive and Negative Incentives in the Classroom: An Analysis of GradingSystems and Student Motivation

Conference Session

Pre-College Engineering Education Division Poster Session

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Steve Efe, Morgan State University; Medha Dalal, Arizona State University; Adam Carberry, Arizona State University; David Rogers; Petronella James-Okeke, Morgan State University; Iseunifeoluwa Akinkugbe, Morgan State University; Rachel Figard, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

to participation will bereduced by providing more consistent support through tutorials, help desks, and other resources. Thisrethinking of PBL resources not only provides an opportunity to eliminate barriers but could enhancelearning outcomes by embracing design constraints which closely mirror the real-world constraints of theprofessional disciplines themselves. It is through our work in e4usa+FIRST that we hope to make thesestrides in increasing opportunities for all students, while improving the overall quality of pre-collegeengineering education everywhere. 5References[1] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, and J. Coleman, “Hands-On Summer Camp to Attract K – 12 Students to

Conference Session

First-Year Programs Division Technical Session 10: Best of First-Year Programs Division

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian Robinson; James Lewis, University of Louisville; Nicholas Hawkins, University of Louisville; Thomas Tretter; Fei Bi Chan

of the ENGR 111 course was analyzed with independent samples t-test to explore ifthere were significant differences in these key constructs that could be ascribed to the onlinemakerspace format vs. normal face-to-face.1. Course DescriptionIn the fall of 2014, the J. B. Speed School of Engineering (SSoE) at the University of Louisville(UofL) commenced an endeavor to overhaul the institution’s existing course(s) focused onintroducing students to the fundamentals and profession of engineering. After a nearly two-yearperiod of development, the resultant two-course sequence, required for all first-year engineeringstudents, was inaugurated in the Fall 2016 semester [1-3]. The first component of this sequence,Engineering Methods, Tools, &

Conference Session

ERM: Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

Collection

2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Elsa Villa, University of Texas at El Paso; Ann Gates, University of Texas at El Paso; Patricia Morreale, Kean University; Mohsen Beheshti; Nayda Santiago, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus

, Eds., Stylus Publishing, LLC,pp. 113-134, 2005.[6] NCSES (National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics), “Women, Minorities, andPersons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering,” Nat. Cter. for Sci. and Engr. Stats., NSF,DC, 2020. Available: https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/data/. [Accessed August 1, 2020].[7] National Science Foundation, “Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in scienceand engineering,” Nat. Cter. for Sci. and Engr. Stats., NSF, DC, 2021. Available:https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf21321/. [Accessed Sept. 11, 2021].[8] P. Morreale, A. C. Gates, E. Q. Villa, and S. Hug. “Faculty development for researchinclusion: Virtual research experiences for undergraduates,” in Proceedings of the 2021 ASEEVirtual