: Routledge, 2017, pp. 122-137.[2] J. D. Cross and C. A. Carman, ―The relationship between faculty diversity and student success in public community colleges, Community College Journal of Research and Practice, pp. 1-14, 2021, doi: 10.1080/10668926.2021.1910595.[3] J. W. Curtis, ―Faculty diversity and minoritized student outcomes: An analysis of institutional factors‖, in Trends in Academic Employment, working paper ed., S. Shulman, Ed. Fort Collins, CO: Colorado State University, 2021. Accessed March 1, 2022 from Center for the Study of Academic Labor: https://csal.colostate.edu/[4] S. A. Annamma, D. Connor, and B. Ferri, ―Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race
Multicultural EngineeringProgram Endowment, the Penn State National Society of Black Engineers Endowment, AirProducts & Chemicals Inc., Ametek Inc., Bechtel, Boeing, BP Corporation North America Inc.,Chevron Products Company, General Motors Fdn. Inc., Marathon Petroleum Company LP,Northrop Grumman Corp., Phillips 66 Company, PPG Industries, Shell Oil Company, andTextron Inc.References[1] M. Ashley, K. M. Cooper, J. M. Cala, and S. E. Brownell, “Building Better Bridges into STEM: A Synthesis of 25 Years of Literature on STEM Summer Bridge Programs,” CBE—Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 4, p. es3, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1187/cbe.17-05- 0085.[2] A. Persaud and A. L. Freeman, “A model for underrepresented minority students’ success
Water G G Supply F G C S Q
is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under GrantNos. Grant Nos. 1821638, 1821439, and 1821445. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions orrecommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarilyreflect the views of the National Science Foundation.References[1] M. Koretsky, S. Nolen, B. Self, C. Papadopoulos, J. Widmann, M. Prince, D. Dal Bello, “For Systematic Development of Conceptests for Active Learning,” in Proceedings EDULEARN 19 (11th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies), 2019, vol. 1, pp. 8882–8892.[2] M. D. Koretsky, B. J. Brooks, R. M. White, and A. S. Bowen, “Querying the Questions: Student Responses and
. Maldonado, “Chapter 16: Retention and Persistence of Women and Minorities Along the Engineering Pathway in the United States,” in Cambridge Handbook of Engineering Education Research. 2014.[4] R. M. Rincon, and N. Yates, “Women of Color in the Engineering Workplace: Early Career Aspirations, Challenges, and Success Strategies,” 2018, SWE, NSBE.[5] Episode 75: Joan Williams on Navigating Gender Bias Preferences in the Workplace, in SWE Diverse, J. Williams, Ed. 2019: SWE All Together.[6] A. H. Wingfield, “Being Black - but Not Too Black - in the Workplace,” Business, 2015.[7] K. E. Rambo-Hernandez, R. A. Atadero, C. H. Paguyo, M. Morris, S. Park, A. M. A. Casper, B. A. Pedersen, J. Schwartz, R. A. M. Hensel, “Valuing Diversity
://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.429.1402&rep=rep1&type=pdf[4]. East Carolina University, College of Engineering and Technology, Department of Technology Systems, Information and Computer Technology, Available: https://cet.ecu.edu/techsystems/undergraduate-programs/information-computer-technology/ [Accessed: 28 Jan 2022][5]. Popoviciu, C., Sawyer, C., "Building the Campus-as-a-Lab Platform", 2022 ASEE Annual Conference[6]. LoRa Alliance LoRa — “LoRa documentation”, [Online] Available: https://lora.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ [Accessed: 28 Jan 2022].[7]. Gaddam, S. C., and Rai, M. K., "A Comparative Study on Various LPWAN and Cellular Communication Technologies for IoT Based Smart
implement a Designspine-based curriculum or improve their existing curriculum. Future work will focus oncomparing the results of our DesignSpine framework and implementation with other designframeworks.REFERENCES1. Committee on the Engineer of 2020, Educating the Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. 2005, National Academy of Engineering: Washington DC.2. Davies, A., D. Fidler, and M. Gorbi, Future Work Skills 2020. 2011, University of Phoenix Research Institute.3. Olawale, D., J. Sanchez, and S. Spicklemire, UIndy Engineering DesignSpine: Engineering Leadership Development through Interdisciplinary Teams and Early Exposure to Real Life Problems, in American Society for
attending and writing up and expression. approved seminars) are required6. Illinois- 4/8 All engineering students must None that are apparentUrbana- complete 18 hours of approvedChampaign courses distributed as follows: 6 hours of Humanities and the Arts; 6 hours of Social and Behavioral Sciences; 3 courses in Cultural Studies, 1 course each in Non- Western/U.S. Minority Culture(s); U.S. Minority Culture(s); and Western/Comparative Culture(s)6. Michigan- 8/8 Engineering
] Burke, A., Okrent A., & Hale, K. (2022). The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2022. National Science Foundation (NSF). National Center for Engineering and Science Statistics (NCESS). Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221[6] Delahanty, C., Herring, S., Timby, T.A., & Genis, V. (2021, July), Education in a Remote World: Focus on Workforce Readiness. Paper presented at 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual Conference. https://peer.asee.org/education-in-a- remote-world-focus-on-workforce-readiness[7] Farrell, O., Brunton, J. A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. Int J Educ Technol High Educ 17, 25 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239
our world, as explained by Aldrich et al. [6].How can civil engineering stakeholders use the CEBOK3?The four steps to fulfill this objective are awareness, understanding, acceptance, and utilization.Each stakeholder (students, faculty, practicing engineers, employers, and customers) will have adifferent use of the document and will require different approaches to make them aware,understand, accept, and utilize the CEBOK3.The CEBOK3 is a reference document, and readers should treat it as a manual. ASCE formattedthe CEBOK3 to present the categories and outcomes in a logical progression. Individuals canread the introduction to understand the purpose and scope of the CEBOK3, then go to thespecific sections(s) where the CEBOK3 defines individual
stand with the calibration structure and rendered on SolidWorks The finished model of the device has a modular design that will allow doing the calibrationsection in a lab setting and the testing outdoors. Additionally, the aim of the final design was tomaximize the usage of percentages of resources. The so-called product life cycle refers to the totalamount of time from material, manufacturing, assembly, and usage [8]. The life cycle of objectswas covered in the class Computer Aided Engineering.B. Electronics An S-type load cell with a maximum capacity of 100 kg was used in conjunction with anHX711 load cell amplifier and an Arduino Uno microprocessor. The load cell contains four straingauges
., “Designed to Make a Difference,” Pitt Magazine, Fall 2020. 2. ABET Student Outcomes, Criterion 3, https://www.abet.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria/criteria- for-accrediting-engineering-programs-2021-2022/, accessed December 31, 2021. 3. Tutunea, M., Rus, R., and V. Toader, "Traditional Education vs. E-learning in the Vision of Romanian business students," International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46-55, 2009. 4. Hsiung, S. and W. Deal, "Distance Learning Teaching Hands-On Skills At A Distance," Technology and Engineering Teacher, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 36-41, 2013. 5. Sheikh, M.I. and A. M. Basharat
. Morris, P. S. Lewis, and D. L. Sexton, "The concept of entrepreneurial intensity: A conceptual and empirical assessment.," in Thirteenth Annual Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson Park, MA, 1993: Babson College Press, pp. 441-442.[11] P. J.W. and J. W. Carland, "Intrapreneurship and innovation in manufacturing firms: An empirical study of performance implications," Academy Entrepreneurial Journal, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 87-96, 1996.[12] S. Devaraj and M. J. Hicks. (2016). Advanced manufacturing in the United States: The shift toward diversified industries & an educated workforce [Online]. Available: http://conexus.cberdata.org/files/Conexus2016-AdvMfg.pdf.[13] G. R. Stuart, C
, and for different institutions tocollaborate to gain insights on the broader higher education population. If you are interested inusing the instrument with your learners (either in programs, classes, or informal settings) pleasecontact the authors.References [1] B. Cyphers and G. Gebhart. (2019) Behind the one-way mirror: a deep dive into the technology of corporate surveillance. Accessed on: Feb 1, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.eff.org/wp/behind-the-one-way-mirror. [2] M. Murtagh, I. Demir, K. Jenkings, S. Wallace, B. Murtagh, M. Boniol, M. Bota, P. Laflamme, P. Boffetta, V. Ferretti et al., “Securing the data economy: translating privacy and enacting security in the development of datashield,” Public Health Genomics
Rinehart for their support andassistance on the continuing improvement on the project for this course, and the execution of thisstudy.References[1] G. B. Wright, "Student-centered learning in higher education." International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 92-97, 2011[2] R. Kay, "Evaluating the instructional architecture of web-based learning tools (WBLTs): Direct instruction vs. constructivism revisited." Journal of Interactive Learning Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 33-51, Jan. 2013[3] S. A. McLeod, “Kolb - learning styles,” Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html, Oct. 2017.[4] I. Georgiou, C. Zahn, and B. J. Meira. "A systemic framework for case
author then posesthe question to students, why doesn’t the door move (reaction forces in the former case and zero 𝑟𝑟 × ����⃗���⃗ 𝐹𝐹 in the latter case)?References[1] S. Brail, “Quantifying the Value of Service-Learning: A Comparison of Grade Achievement,” in International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, pp. 148-157, 2016.[2] Y. El-Glaly,W. Shi, S. Malachowsky, Q. Yu, and D. E. Krutz, “Presenting and Evaluating the Impact of Experiential Learning in Computing Accessibility Education,” in 2020 IEEE/ACM 42nd International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering Education and Training (ICSE-SEET), Seoul South Korea: Association for Computing Machinery
] M. Yilmaz, J. Ren, S. Custer, and J. Coleman, “Hands-on summer camp to attract K-12 students to engineering fields,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 144–151, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1109/TE.2009.2026366.[4] L. Nilson, Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors, vol. 3. 2010.[5] J. C. Carroll et al., “Lessons learned in K-12 engineering outreach and their impact on program planning (evaluation),” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., vol. 2017-June, 2017, doi: 10.18260/1-2--28622.[6] R. Feldhausen, J. L. Weese, and N. H. Bean, “Increasing student self-efficacy in computational thinking via STEM outreach programs,” SIGCSE 2018 - Proc. 49th ACM Tech. Symp. Comput
% of positive feedback. The study's findings contribute to theconstruction technology body of knowledge by encouraging increase awareness of innovativeand promising technologies so future workforces are equip and ready to tackle the challenges ofthe industry.References[1] P. Gaire, D. Vital, M. R. Khan, C. Chibane, and S. Bhardwaj, “Adhoc mobile power connectivity using a wireless power transmission grid,” Sci. Rep., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97528-5.[2] F. Carbonero, E. Ernst, and E. Weber, “Robots Worldwide: The Impact of Automation on Employment and Trade,” 2020.[3] E. Paus, Confronting dystopia: The new technological revolution and the future of work. 2018.[4] P. Pradhananga, M
) Daytime 13 Fall 2020 Adjunct Faculty (S) Evening 4 Full-Time Faculty (M) Daytime 15 Spring 2021 Adjunct Faculty (B) Evening 5 Full-Time Staff (K) Daytime 15 Fall 2021 Adjunct Faculty (B) Evening 13 Full-Time Faculty (M) Daytime 13 Spring 2022 Adjunct Faculty (B) Evening 15Project 1 – Strain GagesThe first project is an
in the next question inorder to collect common words that students might want as part of the list in the future (“If youused [emotion not listed here] above, what word or phrase did you need?”). The final questionpresented to students is shown in Figure 1, with the emotions listed in the order shown. Figure 1: The pilot question as presented to students in the Qualtrics softwareData CollectionStudents from four classes at three universities were assigned OEMPs in their classes as part of alarger research project [1], [2], [17]. The scope and format of the OEMP(s) assigned in eachclass varied, as shown in Table 1 below.Table 1: Pilot survey question participation. Of 188 students who consented to the survey across
. Finally, they mentioned how exploring projectsin a controlled, low-risk environment allowed them to explore areas of research that otherwisethey would not have been able to explore.The Icarus Program was created with the goal of improving sense of belonging, students'engagement and providing students with an opportunity to have out of the classroom experiencesto apply some of the technical knowledge they were learning in their courses while alsodeveloping a cohort and closely interact with their peers and professors. We consider that thisgoal was fulfilled based on the faculty members' perceptions.References[1] J. S. Eccles, "Families, Schools, and Developing Achievement-Related Motivations and Engagement," in Handbook of socialization: Theory
expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.Reference[1] G.-M. Chen, “A model of global communication competence,” 2005.[2] A. Jaiswal, T. Karabiyik, P. Thomas, and A. J. Magana, “Characterizing Team Orientations and Academic Performance in Cooperative Project-Based Learning Environments,” Educ. Sci., vol. 11, no. 9, Art. no. 9, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/educsci11090520.[3] S. Asonitou, “Improving teamwork and communication skills through an action research project,” in Proceedings of WSEAS Conference, Special Session: New Trends and Technologies for Marketing, Management, Economics and Information Processing II, 2013, pp. 14–16.[4] A. J. Magana
students?" 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013, June. ASEE Conferences, 2013. https://strategy.asee.org/19695 [3] B. Maheswaran, "Teaching an Accelerated Course via Team Activities: Assessment and Peer Rating of the Team Impact". 2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana, 2016, June. ASEE Conferences, 2016. https://peer.asee.org/26015 [4] B. Maheswaran, C. S. Stransky, and H. Kumarakuru, "Innovative Energy Elevator: a Physics and Engineering Wonder!". 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018, June. ASEE Conferences, 2018. https://peer.asee.org/30667 [5] B. Maheswaran, N. B. Tedori, E. J. Whitmore, B. L
studentexpectations without compromising the instructors’ standards. Overall, ungrading offers anopportunity to engage students in the learning and assessment process while instillingaccountability and agency.References:Blum, S. D. 2020. Ungrading: Why Rating Students Undermines Learning (and What to DoInstead). Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. 1st Edition. 10Butler, R. Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation: The effects of task‐involving and ego‐involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology58(1):1 – 14. May 2011.Dosmar, E. A Case Against Grades. The Teaching Professor. June
). https://peer.asee.org/36045[6] Fiegel, G. L., and Derbidge, N. (2015). “Introducing Soil Property Evaluation inGeotechnical Engineering – Some Food for Thought.” Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24364[7] Allen, E., Seaman, J., Lederman, D., and Jaschik, S. (2012). "Conflicted: Faculty and OnlineEducation, 2012." Inside Higher Ed.[8] Kinney, L., Liu, M., and Thornton, M. (2012). “Faculty and Student Perceptions of OnlineLearning in Engineering Education.” Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference &Exposition, San Antonio, Texas. https://peer.asee.org/21387[9] Jolley, D.F., Wilson, S.R., Kelso, C., O’Brien, G. and Mason, C.E. (2016). “AnalyticalThinking, Analytical Action
other video chat options for virtual instruction.References[1] National Center for Education Statistics, '"Number and percentage of undergraduate studentsenrolled in distance education or online classes and degree programs, by selected characteristics:Selected years, 2003-04 through 2015-16," 2018. [Online]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov[Accessed Jan. 25, 2022].[2] M. Cameron, et al., "2019–20 National Postsecondary Student Aid Study (NPSAS:20): FirstLook at the Impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic on Undergraduate StudentEnrollment, Housing, and Finances (Preliminary Data)," 2021. [Online]. Available:https://nces.ed.gov [Accessed Jan. 25, 2022].[3] A. G. Cavinato, R. A. Hunter, L. S. Ott, and J. K. Robinson, “Promoting student
Rates in Engineering Fields,” American Society for Engineering Education, San Antonio, TX,2012.4 B. L . Yoder, “ Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks forUndergraduate Engineering Schools, Departments, and Programs,” American Society for EngineeringEducation, Washington D.C., 2016.5 S. S. Steinberg, “The relations of secondary mathematics to engineering education,” Mathematicsteacher, Vol. 42, No. 8, 1949.6 C. Adelman, “Women and men of the engineering path: A model for the analysis of undergraduatecareers,” U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC, 1998.7 M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of freshman engineering students:Models for determining student attrition in
the learning management system forinstruction, and grading policies and procedures (Table 1). Rubrics are used to grade all courseelements, and prior work by our group has demonstrated high inter-rater consistency using thisapproach [14]. During the semester, there are weekly group meetings where peer leaders haveopportunities to troubleshoot and clarify any questions with the faculty instructor(s). Table 1: Structure of one-day peer leader training. Section No. Training Focus Components Covered Course learning 1 Course Overview Objectives & elements Peer leader roles
curricula,” Transactions of the ASABE, 55(6), 2371-2378, 2012.[2] VanDeGrift, T. and Liao, S., “Helping First-Year Engineering Students Select a Major,” Paper presentedat the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, June 24 -28, 2017.[3] Brozina, C., and Meyers, K., “Engineering Major Discernment: A Model for Informing Students andOffering Choice,” Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, Florida, June16-19 2019.[4] Lent, R., Brown, S. D., and Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual Supports and Barriers to Career Choice: ASocial Cognitive Analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47 (1), 36 – 49.[5] Lent, R.W., Schmidt, L., Schmidt, J., and Pertmer, G., “Exploration of Collective Efficacy Beliefs inStudent
review by Texas A&MUniversity-Corpus Christi Institutional Review Board (IRB Number: TAMU-CC-IRB-2021-0227).References [1] Overview of the Internet of Things. Series Y: Global Information Infrastructure, Internet Protocol Aspects and Next-Generation Networks, Recommendation ITU-T Y.2060, (2012, June), ITU-T, Telecommunication Standardization sector of ITU, International Telecommunication Union. [2] Gayle, M., & Mangra, D. (2021, November), Engineering by Remote Online Learning During COVID-19, 2021 Fall ASEE Middle Atlantic Section Meeting, Virtually Hosted by the section. https://peer.asee.org/38430[3] Hsieh, S. (2020, June), Remotely Accessible 3-D Printer for Teaching CNC Programming: Lessons