Paper ID #37605Board 157: Conducting the Pilot Study of Integrating AI: An ExperienceIntegrating Machine Learning into Upper Elementary Robotics Learning(Work in Progress)Ms. Geling Xu, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach Geling (Jazz) Xu is a Ph.D. student in STEM Education at Tufts University and a research assistant at Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach(CEEO). She is interested in K-12 STEM education, playful learning, MakerSpace, LEGO education, making and learning, and course design. Her current work at Tufts CEEO Fetlab is on integrative AI and Novel Engineering for upper elementary school
) J. Geoff Knowles, PhD, Bryan College Jung Han, PhD, Purdue University Todd Kelley, PhD, Purdue University Abstract TRAILS is an integrated STEM education program designed to partnersecondary teachers in engineering technology education with science teachers toimplement integrated STEM curriculum. This year, an NSF scale-up grant wasfunded to continue research and implementation of the TRAILS project, TRAILS2.0. The continuation of this work is now expanded to include a collaboration ofpartners. The TRAILS 2.0 project will address the needs of diverse populationsin rural school settings. TRAILS seeks to impact underserved, underrepresentedstudents
, and Computing (CEISMC). She is involved with engineering education innoMr. Jeffrey H. Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology After 14 years in the middle and high school math and engineering classroom where Mr. Rosen was working on the integration of engineering and robotics into the teaching of the core curricula classrooms. He has now been at Georgia Tech’s CEISMC for the pasDr. Marc Weissburg ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 A Case Study Investigating High School Teachers’ Implementation of an Engineering-focused Biologically Inspired Design Curriculum (Fundamental Research)AbstractThis research study explores teachers’ implementation of an
et al. found that to enable teachers to teachCS and CT in an integrated manner, teachers need support staff, physical resources, willingness toexperiment, and the ability to notice student responses. Teachers faced many obstacles thatimpeded successful integration of CS and engineering into the elementary curriculum. Theystruggled to justify the time spent on CS and engineering when it was not part of standard,state-mandated curriculum. Despite the obstacles, support staff of PD researchers was a veryhelpful resource that enabled integration.3 MethodologyTo mitigate these challenges, it is first important to identify promising practices and techniques soteachers can be trained in those practices. We wanted to learn more about what
curriculum andprofessional development programs in the future. In addition to the most frequently used fields for PCK models in the literature (contentknowledge, general pedagogical knowledge, and contextual knowledge), our study come up withengineering integration PCK domain distinctively due to engineering’s interdisciplinary nature.Similarly, Yeter (2021)’s results also demonstrated that unit-specific content knowledge andinterdisciplinary application were distinctive domains in his instrument development study to elicitelementary teachers’ engineering PCK. To sum up, we hope that the framework of EIPCK willguide educational practitioners and researchers in the development of an instrument to elicitteachers' pedagogical content knowledge
“…specific instructional practices that supportstudents’ integration of engineering with concepts and practices from other STEM subjects,” aspressing issues driving professional development [1]. However, since curriculum innovationsthat work in some educational settings may not work in others [3], educators need guidance onhow to balance innovation and implementation that can be sustained and maintained throughteacher-informed classroom practices, especially when meeting the needs of diverse learners.Understanding how and why innovations in engineering education work is necessary forreplicating success across classrooms and school districts.Middle school engineering continues to be an important area of research. With growing evidenceof positive
Paper ID #40217Board 159: Developing An Assessment Toolkit for Pre-college SummerEngineering Workshops (Works-in-Progress)Dr. Tamecia R. Jones, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Tamecia Jones is an assistant professor in the STEM Education Department at North Carolina State Uni- versity College of Education with a research focus on K-12 engineering education, assessment, and infor- mal and formal learning environments.Dr. Leah Bug, North Carolina State University at Raleigh Dr. Leah Bug has over 35 years of experience teaching both formal and informal K-20 STEM education, with over 20 years in designing and
andrelationships to understand how failure and frustration might manifest to shape motivation andinterests, despite children spending most of their waking hours outside of school environments[36].Parents, Emotional Socialization, and LearningAlongside educators and typical classroom spaces, families and out-of-school contexts often playan important role in the learning and development of children [37], [38]. Ma and colleagues [39]discuss several domains of learning outcomes for young children (e.g., behavioral involvement,personal involvement, intellectual involvement) all of which include parents or caregiversplaying an integral and influential role. The parent-child relationship itself has been found toinclude several relational domains, which also
, 4: 761–800.7. Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan. 2019. Designing for rightful presence in STEM: The role of making present practices. Journal of the Learning Sciences 28, 4–5: 616–658.8. Jessica R. Chittum, Brett D. Jones, Sehmuz Akalin, and Ásta B. Schram. 2017. The effects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International journal of STEM education 4, 1: 11.9. Sharon Lynn Chu, Rebecca Schlegel, Francis Quek, Andrew Christy, and Kaiyuan Chen. 2017. “I make, therefore I am”: The Effects of Curriculum-Aligned Making on Children’s Self-Identity. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 109–120.10. Jennifer D. Cribbs, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert
high schools that haveJROTC programs. The Project offers a multi-year pathway to JROTC Cadets in order to earn abadge (an award of recognition) from their JROTC programs (Figure 1), and supports the missionof CSforALL, which is to make high-quality CS education an integral part of the educationalexperience for all cadets and teachers.To build capacity for CS and cybersecurity education among the 30 schools invited as part of theDemonstration Project cohort, CSforALL implemented a modified version of their SCRIPTworkshop [6]. This workshop provided a strategic way to encourage and develop evidence-basedCS course (e.g., AP CS Principles) offerings. Each school had a team of educators (e.g.,administrators, teachers, JROTC instructors, and/or
increasingly acknowledging the importance of creativityin engineering design. All recognize that the shifting world presents challenges that requireinnovation, and as such, engineering education should concentrate on training engineers with thecapacity to innovate.The National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and the National Research Council (NRC) Centerfor Education established principles in 2006 to guide pre-college engineering education,including emphasizing engineering design and promoting an engineering mindset thatencourages creativity [8]. However, integrating engineering concepts into pre-college curricularemains difficult, particularly in STEM classrooms. Despite engineering occupying a significantplace in STEM, it is often seen as separate from
, e4usa [7] found that administrators from a singleschool site reported a desire for a more holistic approach to adopting engineering at the highschool level than simply providing a curriculum. This included reporting a desire for professionaldevelopment for teachers, connections to larger curricular and standards movements, andconnections to industry or community. Several studies have also explored the role of administrators within STEM integrationand broader STEM initiatives in order to understand how administrators can facilitate or hinderthe success of such initiatives [8,9]. For instance, in an evaluation of a state-wide multi-yearinitiative to increase the use of STEM integration in high schools, Havice et al. (2019) found
in Singapore which will be discussed later in the paper.Thirdly, STEM Inc., an entity under the Science Centre Singapore, supports schoolsimplementing STEM-related curriculums. Similarly, the Multi-centric Education Research andIndustry STEM Centre at the National Institute of Education (meriSTEM@NIE Centre) alsoplayed a vital role in leading and facilitating STEM education development in Singapore. Lastlyare the ground-up efforts such as STEM co-curricular activities, competitions, research projects,and industrial visits. The current initiatives have demonstrated a relatively surface level of STEMand engineering integration. Many potentials can be seen, and gaps in the system await educatorsto address and further refine.Potentials and
Paper ID #37528Board 151: An After-school STEM Program with a Novel Equitable andInclusive Structure (Work in Progress, Diversity)Dr. Matthew Aldeman, Illinois State University Matt Aldeman is an Associate Professor of Technology at Illinois State University, where he teaches in the Renewable Energy and Engineering Technology programs. Matt joined the Technology department faculty after working at the Illinois State University Center for Renewable Energy for over five years. Previously, he worked at General Electric as a wind site manager at the Grand Ridge and Rail Splitter wind projects. Matt’s experience also
]. Available: https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data[5] U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS, “Employment Projections: Fastest growing occupations,” 2022. Accessed: Feb. 12, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.bls.gov/emp/tables.htm[6] T. Simley et al., “Assessing the Efficacy of Integrating Computer Science, Math, and Science in a Middle School Sphero Robotics Summer Program,” in 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology, RESPECT 2020 - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., Mar. 2020. doi: 10.1109/RESPECT49803.2020.9272479.[7] A. Sullivan and M. U. Bers, “Robotics in the early childhood classroom: learning outcomes from an 8
Paper ID #38035Board 155: Broadening Participation and the Mission of Engineering forUS All (e4usa) through Design Projects That Engage Students withDisabilities as Stakeholders (Work in Progress)Dr. Jennifer Kouo, The Institute for Innovation in Development, Engagement, and Learning Systems (IDE-ALS) at the Johns Hopkins University School of Education Dr. Jennifer Kouo is an Assistant Research Scientist at the IDEALS Institute. Jennifer’s areas of expertise include Universal Design for Learning, technology integration, assistive technologies, and serving stu- dents with a range of disabilities, particularly autism spectrum
technology education to T&E education. These standardswere offered as a voluntary resource for Pennsylvania’s schools and guided T&E curriculum,instruction, assessment, and teacher preparation until the adoption of the Science, Technology &Engineering, Environmental Literacy and Sustainability (STEELS) standards in July of 2022.Like the previous Pennsylvania standards, the STEELS feature an integrative science and T&Eperspective [6]. The T&E standards within the STEELS were developed on the followingfoundational beliefs: • Every student is capable of technological and engineering literacy. • Technology and engineering can be explored through an integrated and active learning process. • Iteration and reflection
examined. After careful consideration, the Robolink Co-drone [1] was chosenas the experimental platform for students to study drone flight, control and stabilize a drone.However, developing a set of comprehensible lectures proved to be a difficult task. Based onthe requirements of the certificate program, the lectures were designed to cover the followingtopics: (a) an overview of fundamentals of drone flight principles, including the forces actingon a drone such as lift, weight, drag, and thrust, as well as the selection of on-boardcomponents and trade-offs for proper payload and force balance; (b) an introduction to theproportional-integral-directive (PID) controller and its role in stabilizing a drone and reducingsteady-state errors; (c) an
their learning to theirclassroom curriculum. The second part of the iRIDE program is a two-week-long Summer Academy facilitated by the programlead and teachers from the affiliated middle schools.Students from affiliated schools apply for the Academyand immerse themselves in an extensive engineeringprogram through hands-on projects and other activitiesgeared towards engineering. In the two weeks, studentstour the university campus, participate in hands-on STEMactivities, attend guest speaker sessions from varyingengineering fields, and complete a Capstone Project usingtheir prior experiences and community dynamics (see Figure 3: Summer 2022 CohortFigure 4 for Summer Academy
thoseunderrepresented in STEM, succeed and persist in STEM coursework and programs[5-8]. An ELErequires administrators, teachers, counselors, community members, and parents to workcollaboratively to understand the foundational practices required to improve all students’outcomes[9]. Understanding of the importance of diverse and culturally relevant learningenvironments in engineering education is growing[10]. However, the field lacks effective PD(Professional Development) models and curriculum for developing and sustaining ELEs in ruralsettings to improve students’ pursuit of postsecondary engineering programs. Rural schools oftenlack access to engineering professionals or rigorous high-quality engineering education[11]. Webelieve that needs to change.This
Capobianco et al.’s [23] andFralick et al.’s [22] studies. In that time, there has been significant growth in the profile of engineering inpre-college education, which may have resulted in these participants having more exposure to diverseengineers than the participants had in previous studies. For example, the Next Generation ScienceStandards (NGSS) were released in 2013 [6]. These standards seek to integrate engineering into thescience curriculum across grade levels. While not all states adopted NGSS, by 2018, 70% of states hadeither adopted NGSS itself or developed state-specific standards based upon NGSS, including Ohio,where this study occurred [39]. Additionally, toys which seek to market STEM to specifically to girls,such as GoldieBlox [11
Paper ID #38531Biologically Inspired Design For High School Engineering Students (Workin Progress)Dr. Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is Associate Director and Principal Research Scientist at Georgia Institute of Tech- nology’s Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics and Computing (CEISMC). Her research focuses on improving K-12 STEM education through research on curriculum development, teacher pro- fessional development, and student learning in integrated STEM environments. Dr. Alemdar is currently PI and co-PI on various NSF funded projects. Her expertise includes program
work. Mathematical modeling is an interdisciplinary mathematics topic that is critical andnecessary in STEM and non-Stem fields. The use of mathematical modeling in engineeringproblems has the potential to facilitate mathematics teachers’ understanding of engineeringconcepts and is advantageous as mathematical modeling is a practice standard in themathematics educational standards(i.e., Common Core State Standards for Mathematics [19]).In addition, mathematical modeling in engineering problems can help teachers counter the notionat the K-12 level that engineering is more or less a structured process of trial and error [4].These types of integrated problems would also allow K-12 mathematics teachers to gain a betterunderstanding of the
of organizations she is associated with. Learn more about Sreyoshi’s impact - www.ThatStatsGirl.com ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engineering Interventions in My Science Classroom: What’s My Role? (WIP) Abstract This work in progress paper draws on data from year one of a multi-year project aimed atintegrating engineering into middle-school science classes. The expectation that middle schoolteachers integrate engineering into their science curriculum may be challenging as engineering-related content has not historically been part of teacher preparation. Particularly in rural areas, in-service teacher training related to engineering
. Routledge, 2016, pp. 23–37.[19] S.-C. Fan and K.-C. Yu, “How an integrative STEM curriculum can benefit students in engineering design practices,” Int. J. Technol. Des. Educ., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 107–129, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s10798-015-9328-x.[20] R. K. Yin, Case study research and applications: Design and methods, 6nd Ed. Los Angeles: Cal: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018.[21] M. Llopart, J. M. Serra, and M. Esteban-Guitart, “Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits, limitations, and areas for improvement of the funds of knowledge approach. A qualitative study,” Teach. Teach., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 571–583, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/13540602.2018.1452729.
]. We defined engineering identity as a socio-culturally and personallyconstructed view of yourself as an individual who can do engineering design and who feels asense of belonging within engineering. This definition is an adaptation of the PEAR Institute andthe sociocultural perspectives reviewed by Verhoeven and colleagues. Future studies ofSUPERCHARGE will utilize the Common Instrument for students and educators from the PEARInstitute [7]. The STEM Learning Ecosystem model was used as a lens to explore the factors ofinfluence in engineering and STEM identity development in this study.MethodologyParticipantsThis study is a work in progress and at this time the participants included four undergraduatestudents who were working as curriculum
engagement in the coding exhibit activity, in which they used a computer towrite an algorithm to help deliver medicine to the animals, children compared that with usingcomputers at school to complete assignments. Parents’ experiences with CT and engineering areconsistent with literature suggesting that CT and engineering should be integrated with otherdisciplines [15]; [21]. As Yadav et al. [46] indicate, using CT vocabulary across the curriculumcan reinforce students’ understanding of the terms and help students see their applicability acrossthe curriculum and in daily life. Hence, it is vital to develop parents’ knowledge of CT andengineering and its core components if it is to be infused early into children's education [47].Furthermore, parents
Engineering.Dr. Daniel Cha, University of Delaware Dr. Daniel K. Cha is a Professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at University of Delaware. He has over 30 years of academic and industrial research experience in the area of environ- mental biological processes. Most of his research has focused on microbial degradation of environmental contaminants in natural and engineered systems, and sustainable solutions to wastewater treatment. Dr. Cha received his Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from the University of California at Berkeley. Prior to joining University of Delaware, Dr. Cha also worked as a consulting engineer for an environmental consulting firm and an assistant engineer at a wastewater
Paper ID #40012Is this a good engineering activity? Helping K-12 teachers implementquality activities in their classroomsDr. Stacy K. Firth Stacy K. Firth is an Assistant Professor (Lecturer) in the Department of Chemical Engineering at the University of Utah. In her role, she focuses on Engineering education in grades K-12 and undergradu- ate education. She has developed an inclusive curriculum for a year-long Engineering exploration and projects course that is now taught in 57 Utah high schools. She also developed and provides professional development workshops for Elementary and Secondary science educators to support
computing. This paper discusses the summer program and curriculum, culturally-responsive teaching strategies deployed, student learning outcomes, and perceptions of culturalresponsiveness assessed in the Females are Cyber Starssummer programs.IntroductionMeeting the future cybersecurity challenges requires the United States to utilize all of its availableworkforce talents. There is a shortage of nearly three million cybersecurity professionals and staff. Almost60% of organizations report that they are at an extreme or moderate cyber risk due to the high staff shortage[1]. Although women are a significant resource pool, historically the technology industry has done a poorjob recruiting women in