dynamics. By including a diverse set of students as the problem solvers in the videosused in class, the author would not only get some help expanding the tool, but also do so in away that expanded the diversity of possible role models that the students were exposed to as partof their class experience. The rest of the paper explores the theoretical foundation of the project,the methodology used, some preliminary assessment results, and the future avenues of researchfor the project.Background and Literature Review:Open Educational Resources and the Mechanics Map Project:The line of research discussed in this paper was born out of a necessary expansion of theMechanics Map Project [1], an online resource for engineering statics and dynamics. With
Engineering StudentsIntroduction Engineering in the United States is growing stagnant from a lack of change. According toEngineering by the Numbers for the year 2021, many of the top-producing universities forengineers either remained the same from the previous year or, in the case of George Tech (thetop school), graduated fewer students in 2021 than in 2020 [1]. Much of the conversationsurrounding engineering today is much the same as it has been for years. There is not enough“supply,” i.e., engineers, to meet the demand for engineers in today's economy [2],[3]. Manyhave proposed that diversifying engineering can change this narrative and meet the demand forengineers [2],[3]. Much of the literature surrounding engineering
engagement in STEM education and careers.Amy Hurst, New York University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023The Impact of Participating in an Afterschool Professional Training Program on Youth Employees (RTP)1. IntroductionAfterschool STEM training programs for youth provide valuable opportunities to learn hands-on,real-world technical and social skills and develop STEM career interests [2,21]. However, manyyouths, especially in urban contexts, face financial pressures and may instead take afterschooljobs in non-technical fields such as food service or retail [5,30]. Paid out-of-schooltime (OST)professional training programs that can offer youth learning experiences while earning an
(BVI). Most media available for instruction are visual, and manyconcepts are taught visually, making them inaccessible to students with BVI. In addition to thewider use of alternative text (alt text) [1], swell paper printing, braille touch pads, sonification,and other technologies, individual instructors have made strides in using 3D printing to makegraphical engineering content more accessible [2]. Other studies have been done to show theeffectiveness of 3D printing in delivering instruction to students with visual impairments [3]-[4].Ready access to 3D printable media for engineering education remains elusive despite 3Dprinting technology becoming widespread, partially due to cost and partially due tocomplications in transforming flat
toevaluate knowledge gains.Keywords –experimental-centric learning, hands-on, curiosity, engagement.IntroductionLaboratory experiments help students understand basic chemistry ideas. Simple experiments work best, butcomplicated experiments can cause confusion and boredom. Over time, students may forget what they learnedand cannot use the information in other areas [1], [2]. There is often a disconnect between the teachingmethods used by educators and the learning styles of individual students, leading to a lack of engagement andunderstanding. There have been numerous studies conducted on this topic, and several factors have beenidentified as contributing to the gap between teaching and learning, including teaching methods that are notaligned with
) elements of the course. We propose this alignment beimplemented in classes either as a stand-alone course or an accompanying lab to help studentsunbox reservoir simulation. IntroductionBackgroundThe need to minimize risks and maximize returns associated with alternative petroleum reservoirdevelopment options is the compelling motivation for the task of reservoir performance prediction.Such predictions are necessary for investment and operational decisions. Reservoir simulation is astate-of-the-art performance prediction tool that deploys physics, mathematics, programming, andreservoir engineering to formulate and implement reservoir fluid flow models as a computerprogram [1]. Thus, students are typically
. There is a needto bridge this knowledge gap in order to position each accepted student to succeed in graduatestudies.Since 2018 the department has offered a self-paced online course sequence consisting of twocourses, three credit hours each which are typically taken Fall/Spring or Spring/Summer, forstudents with a BS degree in a non-CHE science or engineering field. This two-course sequenceserves as a “bridging course” and teaches the core concepts in chemical engineering to students,covering material including material and energy balances, thermodynamics, transportphenomena, and reactor design. The course content, organization and continuous improvementhave been previously presented and documented [1-5].Now that the two-course sequence has
learning and being actively engaged with the topic with the help of learning ma-terial [1]–[3]. Freeman’s analysis of student performance in undergraduate STEM disciplinesshowed that students are 1.5 times more likely to fail when they are only exposed to verbal lec-turing [3]. The focus of learning is slowly shifting towards more student-centered learning andaway from instructor-centered learning as pedagogies broaden.Several important unit operations covered in the chemical engineering curriculum involvepacked or fluidized beds where surface interactions of solids and fluids are very important. Flu-idized beds are commonly used in industrial applications such as surface coating, catalytic crack-ing, heat transfer, adsorption, and combustion [4
meaningfulmentoring, and deep-rooted and critical evaluation consist of.IntroductionGraduate teaching assistants (GTAs) perform an important role in engineering departments and areusually required to teach in a variety of subjects and settings. Additionally, they are paid for the workthey do in this area, so are expected to be reasonably good in the role and are often relied upon to bean important role model for younger students [1]. However, there are times when the professionaldevelopment needs of GTAs have been neglected, for example through inadequate training which isusually accompanied by a loss of motivation [2]. Hence, it is important to pinpoint training needsamong the GTA population. In our particular context, we employ approximately 170 GTAs in
, achieving improved learning and motivationresults with the group that used a flipped classroom approach. Similarly, [1] studied a universitycourse in organic chemistry, using a Likert-type survey to measure the effect on learning throughgrade comparisons and student perceptions. While no significant differences were noted ingrades, most students viewed flipped classroom videos positively. Finally, [9] investigated thetopic in a secondary school science course. They measured the effect on learning through a pre-test and post-test and student perception via a Likert-type survey. In this case, more excellentlearning was achieved in the flipped classroom group, and there was a positive perception ofusing this strategy.Additional research has
involves the contribution of studentsand faculty from chemical engineering, electrical engineering, and computer sciences, as a partof a Capstone design project looking for innovations on undergraduate engineering education.The chemical engineering lab-on-a-kit will contribute to modernize unit operations laboratoriesand provide opportunities for K-12 experimental demonstrations and outreach initiatives.IntroductionLaboratory-based courses provide engineering students with important skills including hands-onexperimentation, team dynamics, troubleshooting, and communications. These and other skillshave been recognized as well-defined pillars supporting the relevance of practical work inengineering majors[1], [2]. Unit operations laboratories (UOLs
prioritize diversity in training the next generation of technical experts,researchers, and leaders, it is essential to address any institutionalized inequities that may hindertheir success. This push for diversity includes enrolling students with increasingly distinctbackgrounds, cultures, prior training, learning styles, and goals. However, simply enrolling amore diverse student body does not guarantee a diverse set of graduates [1]. Instead, to provideequitable instruction to all students, universities must not only focus on academic factors toimprove achievement gaps, but also socioemotional aspects that will encourage students to persistwithin their academic track, as posited by the heads-and-hearts hypothesis [2]. In this context,equity is
theteaching and learning of a physics course through the students' perception. The modifiedILD has the same three stages as the original ILD, with two main differences in whoperforms the experiment and when it is performed. Specifically, the three phases in themodified ILD are 1) predict, 2) experiment (by students working in groups, not theinstructor), and 3) reflect (in groups, not individually). The first phase, prediction, beginswith the analysis of a physical situation in which students have to predict the behavior ofthe situation based on the knowledge imparted in the session by the instructor. This occursat the end of the instructor's exposition. The second phase occurs in the laboratory sectionof the course and relates to students' experience
-regardless of background [1]. With a projected increase in STEM jobs of 8 percent by 2029 (ahigher rate than non-STEM jobs [2]) there is a need to address the equitable cultivation of aSTEM workforce that is diverse and culturally relevant.In order to broaden the interest of young learners in STEM, many educators are including art intheir STEM activities (making STEAM the new acronym.) This inclusionary practice has thepotential to encourage a more diverse population of learners to become engaged in STEMpractices [3]. With arts-inclusive STEM programming, we prepare students to beinterdisciplinary collaborators who can add new perspectives to the increasing demand forinnovation.Even with governmental initiatives and inclusive practices to increase
Engineering EducationBackground/MotivationThe research on self-concept has been occupying a significant portion of the studies contributingto the advancement of educational psychology. As much as the topic has gained popularity in thepast decades, it suffered due to the lack of a concrete definition in its early years of advent [1].As interest in it grew, self-concept also gained strength, clarity, and structure. It grew strong as itgained a definition explaining how it might play an important role for a student and for aneducator [1]. Clarity was provided when it was differentiated from some parallel concepts inself-theory and affixing a space for self-concept in an individual’s perceptions, and not a justplaceholder [2]. Structure was added by
that theparticipants of the larger study are from a privileged group (white men). The results also suggestthat white men’s allyship can increase due to interrogation of other white men, as well asmentoring by a PI of color. Thus, in this autoethnographic study, we will provide insights on theimpact of equity research within the context of collaborative efforts between researchers fromracially marginalized and privileged groups.IntroductionRacialized minoritized populations have been historically barred from participation in highereducation [1]. In recent decades there has been increased access due to interventions likeaffirmative action and other policies. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM) higher education
College Graduates (NSCG), over 50% of bachelor’sdegree recipients between 2008 and 2017 attended some community college, and 25% earned anassociate’s degree in their path to achieve educational attainment goals and pursue careeradvancement [4]. Reasons for attending a community college vary, but the primary reason is toearn credits towards a bachelor’s degree.Many STEM careers now require a 4-year degree [1]. Over the past two decades, the NationalResearch Council (NRC) has called on community colleges to broaden participation and expandpathways to STEM degrees to meet the goal of the President’s Council of Advisors on Scienceand Technology [8] of an additional one million STEM professionals to be produced in the UnitedStates by 2025.Research on
declare their major on the entrance to theirfirst year.I. IntroductionThe experiences accumulated by students during their first year in college have a lastingimpact on the rest of their academic lives [1]. The sense of career and institutional belonging,as well as the self-efficacy beliefs of students, have been identified as crucial factors for theirpersistence and success [2] [3]. We argue that both these factors are affected by the awarenessfirst-year students have about their chosen field of study. This is particularly true forinstitutions admitting students into a specific major since their first college year.An assessment of the reasons reported by first- and second-year students in the host institutionfor choosing an engineering major
) whatare the best practices to formulate student assignments given student outcomes for ETACprograms, and b) how to devise and setup up standard rubrics in a LMS for unbiased scoring ofstudent work products.KEYWORDS: Geospatial Literacy, ETAC, ABET, Assessment, Evaluation, ContinuousImprovement, Rubric Assessment, Student Learning Outcomes, Engineering Technology.1. IntroductionEngineering and engineering technology (ET) programs at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs)value accreditation status because it encourages confidence among students that the educationalexperience offered by the institution meets high standards of excellence, enhances theiremployment opportunities, provides access to federal grants and scholarships, and satisfies
paper presents the process of redefinition of the laboratory activity, as well as acomparative analysis of the results of students that completed the activity before and after itsredefinition.1. IntroductionCEC-322 Microprocessor Systems Laboratory, students are asked to implement real applicationsof embedded systems. These implementations are carried out using a Texas Instrumentsdevelopment board that equips a microcontroller based on an M-family ARM microprocessor[1].Examples of laboratory activities in this class include implementing a graphic dial system basedon the use of potentiometers, implementing a light sensor using a photodiode, and implementinga solution that uses a stepper motor with multiple types of modes of operations among
was to provide an early-career, technology-oriented degree to professionals that addressleadership, management, and technical knowledge. Once completed, the degree will expand thegraduates’ career opportunities and add value to their organizations. [1], [2]Literature ReviewThe origin of the MSEM program differs from many other online master’s programs inengineering management, in that other online programs were often designed around existingengineering management or industrial engineering courses in corresponding degree-grantingdepartments. [3], [4], [5] This originating agency concept is common, though for EngineeringManagement programs, the courses may be interdepartmental or cross-disciplinary. [6], [7]However, Tennessee Tech University
Design and constraint principles. The methodology andresearch approach presented in this paper could be used as a scalable model for otherundergraduate EM program to help students meet graduation requirements in an accreditedprogram while giving them the chance to experience global perspectives in EM applicationsearly on in their academic careers.IntroductionPursuit an undergraduate degree in Engineering Management (EM) can be rigorous for anystudent under normal circumstances. It becomes even more complicated if the student aims tocomplete the program within four years and participate in an international study-abroad program.According to a 2016-17 study [1], only 5.3% of the 2% of US college undergraduate studentswho study abroad are
WebLabs can be generalized by theSingle Output) and can be accessed and controlled directly block diagram at Fig. 1, and presents the following elements:through mobile devices. The interface includes dashboards andgraphics, real-time monitoring of the equipment image and • the system or equipment which is controlled remotely;adjustment of reference values for the control, which iscomputationally implemented through discrete PID • monitoring system by sensors, that acquire process(Proportional, Integral and Derivative) controllers. The work variables in real time; may include electronic signalapproaches the accomplishment of the following experiments:determination of the characteristic
the students’ work in the context of ABET Outcomes 1, 5, and 6, relating toworking in teams to design experiments, analyzing and interpreting data and drawing appropriateconclusions. This paper presents sample experiments that were designed by the studentsinvolving the use of basic concepts in vibrations, mechanics of material, and heat transfer.IntroductionFor engineering students, laboratory experiments constitute an essential part of their curriculum.The engineering theories become observable and a few times palpable during these experiments.In general laboratory experiments are designed to have a single path to reach the desired results.Although this approach is effective in connecting the theories and the results, it does not offer
country of Trinidad and Tobago; I came to Oklahoma to study Mechanical Engineering at Oral Roberts University due to God. I am beginning a post-undergraduate career at Johnson Controls in Wichita Kansas on June 5th as a Mechanical Engineer 1.Miss Benitha Ndayisenga, Oral Roberts University I am a mechanical engineering major in my last year at Oral Roberts University, and my name is Benitha Ndayisenga. I have a keen interest in developing and upgrading mechanical systems, and I have been actively involved in several engineering projects during my academic career. The elbow project can enhance the learning chances for undergraduate mechanical engineering students. After graduating, I want to work in mechanical
use of latent variable models to analyze variability and change over time. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Designing the Laboratory Experience from the Ground Up: Custom Laboratory Equipment and Writing-Intensive PedagogyAbstractThis work details two dimensions involved in designing the educational experience in an under-graduate engineering mechanics laboratory course, centered around the course goals. The twomain goals in the course were: 1) to provide students with hands-on learning experiences in ma-terials testing to enable them to connect these experiences with theoretical concepts taught inthe related lecture course, and 2) to
learning is well established [1], educational needs havechanged in many ways over the past few years. This is partly due to Covid isolation and itsripple effects, and partly due to a rapidly evolving broader context for how people socialize andaccess, distribute and retain information. A forty-year study from 1976-2017 showed increasedlevels of loneliness and isolation in the 2010’s was strongly correlated with fewer in-personinteractions [2]. Prior to the pandemic a significant portion of college students reported feelinglonely [3]. Students have a deep need for connection [3], which is more pressing in light of theMental Health crisis in the United States which was exacerbated by Covid isolation [4]. Collegestudents have also reported feeling
Environmental Health Literacy to Raise Awareness of Antibiotic Resistance Daniel B, Oerther Missouri University of Science and Technology, 1401 North Pine Street, Rolla, MO 65409AbstractThe process of how to engage with communities (i.e., community engagement) is animportant skill for engineers to acquire, and the skill is well suited to experientiallearning (i.e., learning through doing). To educate engineers to perform communityengagement, a module was developed and incorporated as part of three differentengineering courses, namely: 1) science, technology, engineering, art, and math(STEAM) diplomacy (dual-level graduate and undergraduate, elective); 2) public
All movement [1, 2] has universities throughout the worlddeveloping campus-wide entrepreneurship initiatives in the form of new centers, degrees,minors, courses, accelerator programs, and student organizations. Many engineering faculty arebecoming involved in teaching entrepreneurial thinking due to the connection betweenengineering design and opportunity recognition, often associated with entrepreneurship.However, dissemination and sharing practices have yet to be fully optimized across engineeringfaculty and their institutions [3]. The dissemination of best teaching practices can be done through a variety of formats.Yet, within the academic setting, journal manuscripts, and conference proceedings are the mostwell-documented
and improving the quality of research to examine effective practices on a large scale. She oversaw the recent development of csedresearch.org, a K-12 CS Education Research Resource Center with manually curated data from over 1,000 article summaries and a list of over 150 instruments for studying computing education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Centering K-8 CS Teachers’ Experiences During a Day of Dialogue for Teachers and Researchers (RTP) Adrienne Decker1 and Monica M. McGill2 1 University at Buffalo 2