thefollowing categories: Leadership, Learning About Learning, Teamwork, Technical Writing,Technical Presentation, Professional Responsibility and Ethical Decision Making. By completingthis assignment, students are expected to recognize their areas of improvement and plan toachieve their professional goals while completing the program. In this paper, we discuss the PIPassignment, student learning outcomes, students’ perceptions and future improvement that can bemade on the assignment.1. IntroductionPersonal Improvement Plan (PIP), also called Personal Development Plan (PDP) or IndividualDevelopment Plan (IPD), is a written plan that frameworks a student’s professional goals andsteps needed to meet those goals. The Personal Improvement Plan generally
Paper ID #9130Student Engagement Online – Does gender make a difference? A Pilot Studyin One Engineering and Technology CourseAngela D Hutson-Stone, Indiana University Purdue University, IndianapolisDr. Julie M Little-Wiles, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis Dr. J. M. Little-Wiles is currently a Visiting Lecturer in the Department of Technology Leadership and Communication in the School of Engineering and Technology at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI) where she teaches courses in Leadership Philosophy, Leadership Theory, Ethics, Technical Writing and International Management. Prior
macroethical and practical conceptualization of engineering work.As early as 1999, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Board of Directorsrecognized this need and declared, in an official statement, “ASEE believes that engineeringgraduates must be prepared by their education to use sustainable engineering techniques in thepractice of their profession.”1 Engineering professional disciplinary societies have responded byincluding sustainability as part of Engineers’ Codes of Ethics: the first “fundamental canon” ofthe American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Code of Ethics includes that engineers “shallstrive to comply with the principles of sustainable development;”2 the American Institute ofChemical Engineers (AIChE) includes
on current issues and vice versa.Ethics Students should consider ethical situations inherent in the practice of engineering.Teamwork (Team) In K-12 engineering education, it is important to develop students’ abilities to participate as a contributing team member.Engineering Communication Communication is the ability of a student to effectively take in Page 24.555.4(Comm-Engr) information and to relay understandings to others in an
relationships of thewords. Although there were connections established as seen in Figure 2, we could determinewhether there were accurate since the frequency of words doesn’t necessarily define theirassociations with other words. In addition, the concept map was missing some key elements in Page 24.1353.5the class (e.g., shear stress, ethics, and tension). However, it was apparent that the first level was 4accurate, as analysis, FBDs, equilibrium, and forces were the central concepts of a student’sapproach to the class
ethical codes ofconduct expected of and adhered to by the engineering profession. Following this introduction to Page 24.613.4ethics, classes were team taught by faculty in concert with practicing engineers from localindustry and government. Faculty shared their research experiences, while engineers fromindustry presented various projects and even ethical dilemmas they encountered in theworkplace.Engineers participating from industry were recruited via personal contacts made at conferencesand career fairs, telephone calls to local firms’ outreach departments, as well as being drawnfrom members of the College of Engineering’s industrial advisory
Paper ID #10525Challenging Students’ Values and Assumptions Through Project-Based Learn-ingDr. Diana Bairaktarova, The University of Oklahoma Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Practice in the College of Engineering, School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at University of Oklahoma. Diana has over a decade of experience working as a Design Engineer. Her research is focused on human learning and engineering, i.e. understanding how individual differences and aptitudes affect interaction with mechanical objects, and how engineering students’ personality traits influence ethical decision-making
: Designing for the Future of the Field convey it succinctly: “Becauseengineers’ work directly affects the world, engineers must be able and willing to thinkabout their ethical responsibility for the consequences of their inventions in anincreasingly interlinked world environment”5.In the centennial issue of the Journal of Engineering Education (Jan 2011), an essay onhow to engage future engineers suggests, “engineering education has a funny, maybeeven neglectful relationship to people” and there is a call to re-imagine engineeringeducation as something more “socio-technical”6. Rigorous engineering educationresearch is needed to advance fundamental understanding of the nature of today’sincreasingly socio-technical engineering work, as well as
Paper ID #9937Leadership in Multidisciplinary Project Teams: Investigating the emergentnature of leadership in an engineering education contextMegan Kenny Feister, Purdue University Megan K. Feister is a doctoral candidate in the Brian Lamb School of Communication at Purdue Uni- versity. Her research focuses on organizational identity and socialization, team communication, ethical reasoning development and assessment, and innovation and design. Megan holds a B.A. in communica- tion from Saint Louis University and a M.A. in Organizational Communication from the University of Cincinnati.Dr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue
Code of Ethics to class work (d, f).A few supplementary student learning outcomes are as follows:6. Identify and relate real-world/cooperative education experiences to coursework, and reflect on the connection between classroom learning and software engineering practice (i).7. Comprehend global software engineering concepts and challenges (a, h).Course DesignLectures: The course material primarily focuses on the first five Knowledge Areas (KAs) of theSoftware Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK)3: software requirements, design,construction, testing, and maintenance. While the remaining KAs are covered in a newlydeveloped upper-level course (CS 6028- Large Scale Software Engineering), a brief introductionis given to a few topics such as
Louisville.Case studies tie together technical, ethical, and procedural aspects of engineering and requirestudents to undertake higher order thinking in order to synthesize the relevant issues. Casestudies require students to synthesize the facts and engineering principles they have learned. Amajor objective of the case studies is to expose students to some aspects of the modern practiceof engineering, namely: teamwork, problem and data analysis, design creation, presentation anddefense of a designed solution, and professional ethics. In the fabric of a first year course, wherestudents do not have existing engineering principles to build upon, case studies help introducethe engineering profession, teamwork, critical thinking, and presentation of
face the challenges of the future. The ten traits include 1) analyticalskills, 2) practical ingenuity, 3) creativity, 4) communication skills, 5) business &management skills, 6) high ethical standards, 7) professionalism, 8) leadership, 9)dynamism/agility/resilience/flexibility, 10) desire to be a lifelong learner.Research ApproachThe study takes a quantitative approach to analyzing an on-line survey conducted with anational sample of 289 African American student and alumni members participating in up tothree types of non-curricular activities: BGOs, MEPs, NSBE. “Students” in this study aredefined as current undergraduate members of an organization and “alumni” are members whoare no longer enrolled as undergraduate students (i.e., graduate
had a significant impact on both education and practiceof engineering and related disciplines. The history of practice in many engineering disciplines is,in large part, the story of failures, both imminent and actual, and ensuing changes to designs,standards and procedures made as the result of timely interventions or forensic analyses. Inaddition to technical issues, professional and ethical responsibilities are highlighted by therelevant cases. Student learning was assessed through surveys and focus group discussions.Students were asked specifically about the technical lessons learned, as well as their response tothe case studies. Case study questions were included on homework assignments andexaminations. Survey questions linked student
information; determine any restrictions, limitations, and/or constraints; develop aresearch topic list and organize the project using project management tools and techniques. Allof these tasks were to be performed with consideration given to the economic, social, political,ethical, technical, health, and safety aspects of the project environment.In the Second IPR students developed a few courses of action (COAs) and used a specificprocedure, modeled after the military decision making process (MDMP), to evaluate the COAsand select the best one. Students performed some preliminary calculations to help determine thefeasibility of their COAs.For the third IPR, students provided their design description and specifications and performed allthe necessary
mathematics,science, engineering and technology,c. an ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results toimprove processes,d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate toprogram objectives,e. an ability to function effectively on teams,f. an ability to identify, analyze and solve technical problems,g. an ability to communicate effectively,h. a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning,i. an ability to understand professional, ethical and social responsibilities,j. a respect for diversity and a knowledge of contemporary professional, societal and globalissues, andk. a commitment to quality, timeliness, and continuous improvement.Only
interests include engineering as a socially just profession in service to humanity and holistic ap- proaches to engineering education such as ethics of care, humanistic education, and spirituality. He holds a B.S. in Industrial Engineering and a M.Ed. specializing in math education and has worked as an engi- neer, a pastor, and a high school math teacher. Page 24.491.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Engineering Education as a Spiritual VocationAbstractSpirituality and engineering education are often kept in separate compartments of our lives. Theymay slip
–2002 period to 27 papers in 2009 to 36 in 2012 and 52 in 2013.Additionally, the Code of Ethics for the National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE)states that engineers have an ethical obligation to hold paramount the health, safety and welfareof the public in the performance of their professional duties (NSPE website at www.http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.html visited on January 3, 2014). The Code alsoaddresses sustainability: “Engineers shall strive to adhere to the principles of sustainabledevelopment in order to protect the environment for future generations” in the section aboutProfessional Obligations (NSPE website at http://www.nspe.org/Ethics/CodeofEthics/index.htmlvisited on January 3, 2014). But how do we include
Paper ID #10076Immersive Community Engagement ExperienceDr. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski, Ph.D., is Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University. She received her B.S. and M.S. in electrical engineering and Ph.D. in engineering education, all from Purdue University. She has served as a lecturer in Purdue’s School of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Dr. Zoltowski’s academic and research interests include human-centered design learning and assessment, service-learning, ethical reasoning development and assessment, leadership, and assistive technology.Ms. Antonette T
integrated leadership, ethics, and globalization curriculum at BYU and was recently appointed Weidman Professor in Leadership.Dr. Gregg Morris Warnick, Brigham Young University Gregg M. Warnick is the Director of the Weidman Center for Global Leadership and Associate Teaching Professor of Engineering Leadership within the Ira A. Fulton College of Engineering and Technology at Brigham Young University (BYU). The center provides oversight for leadership development and inter- national activities within the college and he works actively with students, faculty and staff to promote and develop increased capabilities in global competence and leadership. His research and teaching interests include developing global agility
sequence, students work to design and construct prototypesof human-powered vehicles for a client with cerebral palsy who lives in the local community. Aclient with cerebral palsy provides not only a real, client-based design experience, but also anopportunity requiring that the students develop a new customer persona differing from the“myself-as-the-customer” model; this process has proved challenging for many of the students.Ideally, by the end of the academic year, students should learn the importance of disassociatingthemselves from the customer as well as understand the ethical obligations associated with beingan engineer.A critical component of this sophomore project is the development of identity and communityamong a cohort of students. The
addition, during intense, annual multi-day retreatsat Cornell University (winter) and Norfolk State University (summer), trainees come together forfurther technical training, professional development, program self-reflection and redesign.Most of the education and training part of the program is delivered in four courses: (1) Technicaland Professional Writing (6 weeks); (2) Training in Independent Research (12 weeks); (3) BestPractices in Teaching and Learning (8 weeks); and (4) Ethics and Intellectual Property (4weeks). The sequence of short, focused modular courses provides a framework conducive to thecycle of (re-)design, enactment, and study of the proposed graduate training activities. It allowsfor students to learn and practice in the same
statement; generating andevaluating ideas and specifications; leading and managing the process; and communicating the Page 24.44.3outcomes. Students formed teams following these procedures to complete two projects over onesemester. The course objectives are as follows: 1. Turn an idea into a final design. 2. Develop a problem statement, analyze proposed solutions and evaluate the final design. 3. Find a solution that meets technical, ethical, environmental, legal, etc. requirements. 4. Build ethics into the design process. 5. Use computer aided design software Autodesk Inventor. 6. Work with the Arduino platform, an open-source
“soft” skill development inundergraduate engineers3. Many of these programs were designed to address the six“professional” skills of the ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 (EC2000) Criterion 3 Outcomes,which include teamwork, ethics, communication, understanding of engineering impacts, passionfor life-long learning, and knowledge of contemporary issues2. Page 24.623.2While many curricular programs can help engineering undergraduates to develop these skills andattributes, co-curricular activities also present a unique opportunity for students to develop these“professional” learning outcomes and other “soft” skills related to engineering education
students.Best Practices and Practical SolutionsFor engineering programs that are ABET accredited, students are expected to meet outcomes in thearea of the professional and ethical responsibility of engineers and designing within ethicalconstraints by the time they graduate.19 Some of the uncivil and unethical behaviors that students exhibitare in violation of the ethics of the profession. In this section, we will provide answers to the followingquestions: How can you structure your undergraduate classroom to minimize disruptive behavior? Whenthere is incivility or ethical misconduct how should you handle it?Minimizing Disruptive BehaviorResearchers note that the most effective way to minimize disruptive behavior in the classroom is topreclude its
personal ‘dream home’focused them on expressing their individual desires of prestige and success which was oftenmanifested in the design of an ostentatious home with no regard for engaging the community inwhich they placed the home. Samuel Mockbee was quoted from a conference held at PrincetonUniversity to say, “The practice of architecture… also requires active civic engagement. It is inour own self-interest to assert our ethical values and our talents as citizen architects.” [5] Theproject in its current state was clearly disengaging students from reality, culture, and the truerichness of designing to exist and engage within a project’s community. The students needed tobe taught the ethical values and influence they can have on the human
not only the solution to theproblem, but also their process for solving it.14,15 The situations described in the MEAs requirestudents to create and use a mathematical model of a physical system using MATLAB, and dealwith professional issues including ethical dilemmas, conflicting information, andincorrect/missing information.16 The first MEA (MEA1) involved investigation of a cable ferryfailure, and modeling the failed system. The second one (MEA2) involved modeling heattransfer in a laptop, and proposing a new product using the heat transfer model.The module learning outcomes are such that open-text responses to complex situated problemsare desirable; the learning outcomes are: 1. Apply a prescribed process for solving complex
University, Atlanta, Georgia, and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education from Purdue University.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, The University of Oklahoma Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Practice in the College of Engineering, School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at University of Oklahoma. Diana has over a decade of experience working as a Design Engineer. Her research is focused on human learning and engineering, i.e. understanding how individual differences and aptitudes affect interaction with mechanical objects, and how engineering students’ personality traits influence ethical decision-making process in engineering design.Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University Dr. Rachel Louis Kajfez
-development, self-regulation,adaptability, flexibility, executive functioning, core self evaluation, work ethic, persistence, study skills,ethics & integrity, and citizenship.7 Page 24.209.3 Previous studies have investigated the skills that will be required in the 21st Century. Some havefocused on specific skills such as critical thinking, 8,9,10 while others have studied categories of skillsindependently, including cognitive skills, 11,112,13 social skills, 14,15 self-regulation, 16,17 andintrapersonal skills.18 A few other studies have investigated more than one skill or category of skillssimultaneously such as the effect of
alternatives) - Evaluation of the pros and cons of each alternative design are compared. An analysis of engineering ethics, hazards, and failures are considered for health and safety concerns. 5. Implementation - Develop the final solution and fabricate, test, and evaluate design. 6. Reflection and Iteration - Contemplates final design, reviews the failures, and redesigns the product accordingly.Figure 1: Graphical Representation of the Engineering Design Cycle, from Voland 2004Following the engineering design cycle, students are walked through each phase of the cycleusing real world examples. Lectures and homeworks are given for each of the cycle phasesusing different examples in world needs and engineering.This course also
, University of Pittsburgh c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #9405 Larry Shuman is senior associate dean for academic affairs and distinguished service professor of in- dustrial engineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering educational experience, emphasizing assessment of learning and problem solving abilities, and studying the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. He has led the development of a very successful cooperative engineering education program and an innovative study abroad