Paper ID #11297Innovation Sandbox: Engineers in a Multidisciplinary PlaygroundDr. Robert S Crockett, California Polytechnic State University Robert Crockett received his Ph.D. from University of Arizona in Materials Science and Engineering. He holds an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University and a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from University of California, Berkeley. He is currently Professor and Director of the General Engineering Program at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. Dr. Crockett is a specialist in technology development and commercialization of advanced materials and manufacturing processes
conferences and published The Journal of Electronic Commerce. He was also a Vice President at the First National Bank of Chicago, where he founded and managed the bank’s market leading professional Cash Management Consulting Group, initiated the bank’s non credit service product management organization and profit center profitability programs and was in- strumental in the breakthrough EDI/EFT payment system implemented by General Motors. Dr. Ferguson is a graduate of Notre Dame, Stanford and Purdue Universities and a member of Tau Beta Pi.Dr. Sridhar S. Condoor, Saint Louis University, Parks College of Eng. Page
Paper ID #11487Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by UtilizingIntegrated Online ModulesDr. Ronald S Harichandran P.E., University of New Haven Ron Harichandran is Dean of the Tagliatela College of Engineering and is the PI of the grant entitled Developing Entrepreneurial Thinking in Engineering Students by Utilizing Integrated Online Modules and a Leadership Cohort. Through this grant entrepreneurial thinking will be integrated into courses spanning all four years in seven ABET accredited engineering and computer science BS programs.Dr. Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven Maria-Isabel
Urbana-Champaign and manages research at the Product Lifecycle Management lab. His research in mechanical engineering focuses on the role of information and semantics in managing and improving product design and manufacturing. He has also worked as a senior research fellow and senior lecturer at the University of Michigan.Kimber J Andrews , University of Illinois Urbana Champaign Kimber Andrews is a PhD candidate in aesthetic education at the University of Illinois Urbana Champaign.Dr. Maryalice S. Wu, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Maryalice is the interim Executive Director and supervisor of the Statistics, GIS, Data and Survey research group in the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of
include an attitude theory based instrument forcollecting information entrepreneurship orientation, a multi-part socio economic statusinstrument, and several additional questions developed by the authors to collect information toexplore ties between demographic and attitude measures of entrepreneurship.Instrument – Entrepreneurship ComponentThe attitude theory component, consisting of 75 Likert-type items, is a modified version of theEntrepreneurial Attitudes and Orientation (EAO) instrument originally developed by Robinson etal16. This instrument, developed in the early 1990’s, used two discrete populations: a populationof entrepreneurs and a population of non-entrepreneurs. The goal of the instrument is toestablish an attitude theory based
enhance theseintrinsic motivators.2.2 Resiliency5Globalization, competition and existing dynamic market conditions require engineers toconstantly innovate, to work and adapt under uncertain conditions and to quickly learn andrecover from mistakes and fails. This requires a high level of “resiliency” defined as theability to overcome and rise above adversity and difficult situations. Page 26.89.3Resiliency describes one´s ability to move forward with optimism and self-confidence evenwhen we are immersed in adversity. It is a mental state motivated by our thoughts, which arein part formulated by our success and our interpretations of past and current
learned in their studies, altered theirview of other disciplines, and gave them the confidence to work on business ideas (new and old)after the event. While many graduates from fields considered a part of the creative class won’tstart their own businesses, the development of an entrepreneurship mindset and use of theassociated tools will be essential as they solve the grand challenges of society. Page 26.504.24ReferencesAkker, J. Van den, Koeno, G., Mckenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. London ; New York : Routledge, 2006.Barab, S., & Duffy, T. (2012). From Practice Fields to Communities of Practice. In
engineers. After interviewing 53 engineering innovators abouttheir experiences as an innovator and qualitatively analyzing the interview data, weidentified twenty unique characteristics of engineers who had demonstratedextraordinary innovative behavior (Ferguson D., 2013). This finding was corroborated bya separate focus group study (Ferguson D. et al., 2014). We then initiated a modifiedDelphi study with 150 engineering innovators drawn from academic, corporate, andentrepreneurial organizations to examine the complex constructs associated withengineering (Ferguson D, Purzer S, Ohland M, Jablokow K, & Menold J, 2014). Delphistudy participants were nominated as extraordinary engineering innovators from large,medium and small firms; from many
. Page 26.1658.12ReferencesAnthony, S., Johnson, M. W., Sinfield, J., & Altman, E. (2008). The innovator’s guide to growth: Putting disruptive innovation to work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.Bilen, S. G., Kisenwether, E., Rzasa, S. E., & Wise, J. C. (2005). Developing and assessing students’ entrepreneurial skills and mind-set. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(2), 233–243.Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The startup owner’s manual: The step-by-step guide for building a great company. Pescadero, CA: K & S Ranch.Christensen, C. (1997). The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Harvard Business Review Press.Duval-Couetil, N., Gotch, C. M., & Yi, S. (2014). The
. Merrill, "CEDA: A research instrument for creative engineering design assessment," Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, vol. 2, no. 3, 2008.3. C. Charyton, and J. Merrill, "Assessing general creativity and creative engineering design in first year engineering students." Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 2, 2009.4. M. Perl, "Developing creativity and innovation in engineering and science," Inter. Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 23, no. 27, 2008.5. H. S. Fogler, S. E. LeBlanc, B. Rizzo, Strategies for Creative Problem Solving, 3rd ed., Prentice Hall, 2013.6. T. Simpson, R. Barton, and D. Celento, "Interdisciplinary by design," Mechanical Engineering, vol. 130, no. 9, 2008.7
National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow. He received his B.S. in Civil Engineering in 2011 with a minor in philosophy and his M. S. in Civil Engineering in 2015. His research focuses on understanding engineers’ core values, dispositions, and worldviews. His dissertation focuses on conceptualizations, the importance of, and methods to teach empathy within engineering. He is currently the Education Director for Engineers for a Sustainable World and an assistant editor for Engineering Studies.Mr. Paul D. Mathis, Purdue University, West Lafayette Engineering Education PhD undergraduate student at Purdue University. Previously a high school educa- tor for six years with a masters in education curriculum and BS
26.917.3sustainability, as described in the previous section. At least one instructor “flipped theclassroom” for this introductory portion, assigning students to watch several sustainability-related TED Talks8 outside of class and discussed and debated the topics in class. Followingthis, they were assigned a project consisting of the following five basic steps: 1. Identify a product with opportunities for improvement in sustainability. 2. Research product’s current design and manufacture. 3. Analyze sustainability of current design and manufacture. 4. Identify alternative design and manufacturing approaches which may increase product’s sustainability. 5. Communicate proposed solution(s) through written and oral summary reports.Some students at
the assessment of that academy.References 1. Kumar, S., & Hsiao, J. K. (2007). Engineers learn “soft skills the hard way”: Planting a seed of leadership in engineering classes. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 7(1), 18-23. 2. Galloway, P. D. (2008). The 21st Century Engineer: A Proposal for Engineering Education Reform, ASCE Press, Virginia 3. Creed, C. J., Suuberg
in meeting the challenges associated with preparing students to succeed in aglobal economy1. In other words, our current education practices lack instruction on how toincorporate the customers’ needs into a technical solution. To accomplish this and ensure theU.S.’s economic competitiveness, known effective pedagogies must be integrated with anentrepreneurial mindset. This mindset will take engineering education beyond providing studentsjust a technical background, but will develop innovative thinkers who consider the value to thecustomer in their solutions. Page 26.69.2Although many colleges offer courses focusing on innovation and
credit hours.” Among these experiences, the author suggestedsupporting a student organization, participation in conferences, and networking activities withstudents at other schools. In summary, this literature review demonstrates that empirical studies of entrepreneurshipprograms often overlook socio-demographic characteristics and simplify the conceptualization ofco-curricular experiences, suggesting a vague alignment with the curriculum.Conceptual Framework In an effort to work towards a more structured approach to studying the complexities ofengineering entrepreneurship education and its impact on students in higher education, we havechosen to position this analysis in the context of Lattuca et al.’s (2014)30 use of the Terenzini
NSF Pathways to Innovation Faculty Fellow. When not working Joe enjoys improvisational dance and music, running trail marathons, backpacking, brewing Belgian beers and most of all enjoying time with his children and wife. Page 26.287.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Blending Entrepreneurship and Design in an Immersive Environment 1 2 Bryan Boulanger and Joseph Tranquillo1 Department of Civil Engineering, Ohio Northern University, 525 S. Main St, Ada, OH 45810
neglected in the first offeringof this two course sequence was the development of a good assessment approach. This aspectwill be addressed in subsequent offerings of the course.AcknowledgementsThe authors gratefully acknowledge Venture Well (formerly the National Collegiate Inventorsand Innovators Alliance) for funding of this project. The authors also thank the Deans of theCollege of Engineering and the Villanova School of Business for supporting travel to Nicaraguato deliver the January 2014 entrepreneurship workshop to UNI students.References[1] P. Singh, S. Kulkarni, E. Keech, R. McDermott-Levy, and J. Klingler, “Progress on Making Healthcare more accessible to Rural Communities in Waslala, Nicaragua, using Low-Cost Telecommunications, IEEE
26.261.13 undergraduate engineering students?Q54 Other Please list any themes you would like us to consider for future program eventsBibliographical Information[1] NACIE University Presidents Commitment Letter, April 19, 2011, http://www.innovationamerica.us/images/stories/2011/NACIE_Letter- University_Commercialization-20110617084146-20110617215655.pdf[2] The Innovative & Entrepreneurial University: Higher Education, Innovation, & Entrepreneurship in Focus, U.S. Department of Commerse, October 2013.[3] Duval-Couetil, N., Reed-Rhodes, T., Haghighi, S., The Engineering Entrepreneurship Survey: An Assessment Instrument to Examine Engineering Student Involvement
ended. Ideally, the community will create new ways towork together, and will continue to share and develop their expertise.AcknowledgmentsThis work is supported by the National Science Foundation: DUE 1125457.References1. Beach, A. L., Henderson, C. & Finkelstein, N. Facilitating Change in Undergraduate STEM Education. Change Mag. High. Learn. 44, 52–59 (2012).2. Dempster, J. A., Benfield, G. & Francis, R. An academic development model for fostering innovation and sharing in curriculum design. Innov. Educ. Teach. Improv. 49, 135–147 (2012).3. Duderstadt, J. J. Engineering for a Changing World. (University of Michigan, 2008).4. Byers, T., Seelig, T., Sheppard, S. & Weilerstein, P. Entrepreneurship: Its Role in
lastingstories that provide a preliminary direction necessary to guide an expansive and meaningfuldesign effort –those that gets at the heart of a mesmerizing story.AcknowledgmentsThanks to the imagination, innovation and disciplined work of all the students in ME 236 atStanford University. We would also like to remember the wisdom of Professor Cliff Nass, whoinspired the course, and to the generous campus affiliate – REVS, which made the class possible. Page 26.326.13References1. Doody, S. Why we need storytellers at the heart of product development. UX Magazine. 655, April, 2011.2. Karanian, B. Patterson, C. and Sansbury, T. Students Redefine
responsibilities, and market cycle economics.Course FormatIn this course, information on relevant innovation topics is delivered by traditional lecture, classdiscussion, and through readings. The learning strategy keys on the operationalization of thegained knowledge. In our approach, each topic is presented in a lecture or a series of lectures.Students then receive assignments consisting of two parts, the first asks them to reflect on andexplain the implications of the topic within the framework of innovation in materials or materialintensive industries. This ensures the students have completed the suggested readings and haveunderstood the content of the lecture(s). The second portion of an assignment asks the student tooperationalize the knowledge of
/Engage, a structuredand coached course process of reflection to one´s own identity and personality, while within ateam setting. The rationale for presenting this learning method and practice is that the processdoes not happen by itself; therefore, by definition, it is more based on social rather than naturalscience and hence, cannot by typically coached by engineering educators without solid structureand a step-by-step process description with rationale included. Methods introduced in this papershed light on this matter and we argue that if implemented accordingly, they can be used by avariety of educators. Storytelling Based Learning is a context driven approach that borrows frominterpersonal psychology, organizational psychology, social
toward the task(Pintrich and Schunk, 2002).” (Carberry A. H.-S., 2010)The implication of this research for engineering educators is that as students develop theircompetence for an engineering task, they are better able to perform that task . . . leading tohigher confidence/self-efficacy . . . leading to willingness to take on more complex, challengingtasks . . . leading to intrinsic motivation and learning of competence . . . and onward in a spiralupward of parallel increases in confidence and competence, leading to engineering mastery(Figure 1). Page 26.970.5
networks.References 1. Brennan, J., Ryan, S., Ranga, M., Broek, S., Durazzi, N., & Kamphuis, B. (2014). Study on Innovation in Higher Education: Final Report. LSE Research Online. Retrieved from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55819/. 2. Bulovic, V. & Murray, F.E. (2014). The MIT Innovation Initiative: Sustaining and Extending a 3. Legacy of Innovation. Retrieved from http://innovation.mit.edu/. 4. Dhillon, B.S. (2006). Creativity for Engineers. Singapore: World Scientific Printers. 5. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. “The Future of Open Innovation.” R&D Management, 40(3), p. 213-221. Retrieved from http://corporateinnovation.berkeley.edu/ open-innovation-research/articles
leading his team at his company. He wouldbe engaging in free-traited behavior. This implies that a person could operate within therealms of large comfort zones professionally while having a small comfort zone at a personallevel. In our research, we validate the idea that a person´s personal and professionalrelationship with uncertainty is not directly correlated; rather, they could be considereddifferent comfort zones.Little’s (2005, 2006, 2007) research validates that personally construed action, termedidiogenic action, has the capacity to confront biogenic and sociogenic forces. We similarlyargue that once you start to feel comfortable by “stepping out” of your comfort zone youbegin to change your biogenic disposition in either your personal
aspects of entrepreneurship and innovation. E-Teams are used toprovide interdisciplinary team building experience so that the engineering students learn to workwith other professions. The students are introduced to the extensive entrepreneur ecosystemavailable to them so that those that have viable ideas or just have the drive can pursue their ideasfor products and businesses.References 1. Blank, Steve & Dorf, Bob. (2012). The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. K & S Ranch. 2. Osterwalder, Alexander & Pigneur, Yves. (2010). Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley and Sons. 3. Blank
. Harvard Business Review, 87(12):60–67, 2009.[48] Clayton Christensen. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press, 2013.[49] Steve Blank and Bob Dorf. The startup owner’s manual. K&S; Ranch, 2012.[50] Steve Blank. Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Business Review, 91(5):63–72, 2013.[51] URL www.prezi.com.[52] URL https://hbr.org/2015/01/the-myth-of-the-tech-whiz-who-quits-college-to-start-a-comp[53] Duval-Couetil, Wheadon, Kisenwether, and Tranquillo. Entrepreneurship and abet accreditation
ofPsychological Type, 2008.[2] Hall, D., Cronk, S., Brackin, P., Barker, M., Crittenden, K., “Living With The Lab: A Curriculum To PrepareFreshman Students To Meet The Attributes Of "The Engineer Of 2020”, 2008 ASEE Annual Conference andExposition, June 22-25, Pittsburgh, PA.[3] Gerhart, A., “Campus-wide Course Modification Program to Implement Active & Collaborative Learning andProblem-based Learning to Address the Entrepreneurial Mindset”, 2013 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition,June 23-26, Atlanta, GA.[4] Gerhart, A., “Project-Based Learning and Design Experiences in Introduction to Engineering Courses: Assessingan Incremental Introduction of Engineering Skills”, 2011 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, June 26-29,Vancouver, B.C.[5