Scotia. It is located on the downtown Sexton Campus, and serves the facultiesof Architecture, Engineering and Planning. A small campus with approximately 2,500 studentswithin those faculties, it makes up about 15% of Dal’s total enrollment of approximately 17,000students. Dal’s Department of Civil and Resource Engineering is comprised of 19 professors and7 adjunct professors, while the Mechanical Engineering Department is comprised of 12professors and 7 adjunct professors.Woodward Library at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Vancouver, British Columbiaserves the faculties of Applied Science, Dentistry, Forestry, Land & Food Systems, Medicine,and Science. The approximately 6,500 undergraduate and graduate engineering students make
evaluation is based on two tests, 5-6 written quizzes or a course project,assignments or lab sessions and a final exam. Courses are planned according to a semesterschedule, comprising 16 weeks of instruction and 2 weeks of exams. On average, each course isassigned 6 ECTS credits, which are equivalent to 180-hours student dedication.The study consisted in changing the methodology of the Relational Databases course (henceforth“DB course”) to an active learning one during second semester 2012. This course is mandatoryfor students of Industrial Engineering and Computer Engineering. Additionally, this course isprogrammed to be taken in the third year of the major, with the duration of the entire curriculumbeing six years. Up until the semester preceding
. 2. Watersheds and their functions Activity in google earth 3. Controlling water/ power development Dam construction 4. Fluid mechanics; pumps, open channels Non-Newtonian Project flow 5. Water treatment Water treatment filtering project Page 26.1505.5 6. Water system park Creation of a water parkTable 3: CBI Challenges for other Developed Courses.Developed Course CBI Challenge 1. Nanotechnology Develop a new multi-million dollar idea using nanotechnology (research plan, technical publication, patent
level, and coauthored a senior level laboratory in acoustics. He recently served as an AP Reader for the AP Physics exam, and is interested in developing materials to help K-12 teachers with units on sound and waves, and to incorporate crash safety topics into their physics curriculum. Page 26.1554.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 The Introductory Physics Laboratory as a Consulting FirmAbstractMany students in our calculus-based introductory physics courses plan to pursue careers in hightechnology industries. The laboratory curriculum entitled Mechanics, Inc. is
Standards for Technological Literacy (STL)developed by the International Technology and Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA,2007).The TeachEngineering team viewed the NGSS release as an unprecedented opportunity todeliver meaningful K-12 engineering curriculum to educators nationwide. In addition to therecently released Common Core Math Standards (CCMS), the NGSS challenges K-12 educatorsto redesign their teaching methods to promote active student involvement in the learning process.Its Performance Expectations include higher-level learning accomplishments1, such as plan andconduct, show, analyze, develop and evaluate, to ensure that students are actively engaged in
obviouslycould not be effectively assessed at the end of the first class. However, plans are in place toperform assessments of retention and understanding in future classes. This process has begun asthis group of students has moved on to the next class in the sequence.The third objective to enhance interest and encourage excitement was assessed through studentsurveys administered at the end of the class. Student responses were anonymous, and they werein the form of level of agreement or disagreement with various statements. The studio instructionapproach melded lecture, discussion, and laboratory activities into integrated sessions, so thesurvey statements mostly focused this combined studio approach. Here are survey statements andsummarized responses
valence were found tobe positively related to control beliefs. 27 It would make sense that FTP could also be anappraisal antecedent, playing a role in students' beliefs as described in CVT, contributing toacademic achievement emotions. Students normally have a few long-term career goals but characterizes students withstrong FTP is their goals that are accompanied with well-devised plans and directions, Page 26.1622.3whereas students with weak FTP have goals that are un-substantiated and fantasy-based.Students' time perspectives allows them to imagine the goal fully and feel an emotionalconnection to both the value of completing particular
widely, from a median of 396min to 3140 min. The collection of schools with the highest use attributed this to severalfactors: anytime access to individual computers for students, compulsory completion ofprescribed KA topics with consequences for non-compliance, close teacher monitoring ofstudent progress, well-planned integration of KA with curriculum, and extended instructionalblocks focusing on mathematics.1 Exploratory analyses of years 5 and 6 from the largestcollection of associated schools found a positive relationship between time spent on KA andnumber of problem sets completed to proficiency with performance (better than predictedperformance in the California Standard Test) and attitudes (lower math anxiety, higher mathself-concept and
the solutions andconsider any additional feedback, they engage metacognitively: they self-assess what they havelearned, and what they still need to know. They are self-directing their learning. According toAmbrose et al., 27 the key metacognitive skills to becoming self-directed learners are "studentsmust learn to assess the demands of the task, evaluate their own knowledge and skills, plan theirapproach, monitor their progress, and adjust their strategies as needed" (p. 191). When thesemetacognitive skills are nurtured, students' complex cognitive reasoning skills are enhancedwhich affect goal setting and improved performance.DiscussionDiscipline-based educational research seeks to understand impediments to student learningwithin a given
distinguish among the different parts of a problem; canthe learner use this skill to debug and troubleshoot a computer program?), evaluating (can thelearner justify a stand, decision or solution to a given problem?), and, finally, creating (can thelearner plan and generate a novel product, point of view or solution to a problem?).In an earlier study 3 we found that there are two barriers for student success in computerprogramming courses: a good understanding of programming concepts and the ability to applythose concepts to write viable computer programs. Factor analysis showed that studentunderstanding of computer programming concepts falls in two meta-conceptual groups: an“algorithmic” (repetition, selection and classes) and a “structural” (methods
. Awareness of thesocial and historical context of science and society motivates internal change as well as anexternal commitment to social justice. There are multiple ways to facilitate emerging engineersto thinking about diversity, categories, social science, and social justice. We chose to do so withrace because of the overwhelming evidence that race is socially constructed9, 10, 11, yet thecontinued belief by many in popular culture and some scientific disciplines that it is largelybiological.GAMES Lesson Plans: An Integration of ScienceIn this paper, we present two examples of social and engineering education integration atGAMES. These examples were carried out in the 2013 (n=29) and 2014 (n=32) offerings of thesummer campThe social context and
withweekly progress were used to document the tasks performed by the students, and also providedformative feedback to the course. For example, remarks such as “we haven’t done this in class”or “needed a lot of revision” helped the instructor to adjust the pace of lecture instruction.3.3 Weekly ScheduleThe following rubric was provided to students to plan and schedule their work:Week 1: Design area selectionList and describe the method that is being used to select a topic and why. Present a shortdescription of how you came to the decision, which could be a literature search, personalcommunication, or other method. Page 26.1309.6Week 2: Identification
reflection pieces that we received, most students (14/16) mentioned that Page 26.1318.8they wished they had more time to complete further designs, which is a sign the their high level of engagement with the project. Moreover, roughly half (7/16) of the reflections described incremental improvement to their original design concept, which is an important part of engineering optimization. Most student reflections mentioned that they should have spent more time on an initial plan, developed their idea more fully before
members starting a chain of catalyticpositive changes in sanitation and hygiene.” This care statement aligns with her research onsustainable and equitable funding schemes for sanitation campaigns. But rather than developingengineering solutions or economic models, her focus is now on how to measure the impact ofsanitation interventions―an endeavor that could inform funding plans akin to social impactbonds.While in India, Sarah focused on sanitation and hygiene metrics specifically for the collaboratorsat ESI. She hopes to continue working with Dr. Hariharan to research metrics for socialimpact―unencumbered by any sense of obligation to build anything.Case study of Student B:When Devika arrived at the KGC, she had taken the course two years prior
the camp and personnelinvolved, and future plans based on evaluations from the current year. In summary, outcomeshave been achieved, and the majority of students felt their experiences were particularlyrewarding. The intent is for this review to provide guidance and inspiration to other aerospaceengineering programs seeking to engage high school students into their program of study.Camp Selection and StructureThe aerospace engineering (AE) camp, Camp SOAR (Summer Opportunities in AerospaceResearch), provided an opportunity for students entering their junior and senior year of highschool to explore the major and learn more about AE at Texas A&M University (TAMU). From
technology project had a high impact in the areas oftime management, engineering career awareness and planning, research methods and techniques,critical thinking concepts, and unit systems and conversions. From previous research we haveconfirmed the fact that engineering students with the demographics of The University of Texas atEl Paso prefer a class that uses technology.Finally, from the attitudinal survey, as a whole, the majority of the students were actively engagedin the different activities required to do the 3D technology project. Comments like the followingwere written on the open-ended questions of the survey: • Question 48. What new technical and engineering concepts did you learn from this project? o “I learned how to use
pricing, traffic simulation, and engineering education.Dr. William J. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is a professor in Civil & Environmental Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. He received his Ph.D. in civil engineering from Georgia Tech and is a registered professional engineer. His research interests focus on transportation infrastructure planning and design, highway safety, and active living by design. He teaches courses in engineering management, transportation engineering, geographic information systems, and land surveying. Page 26.219.1 c American
many of the other non-traditional activities, two exchange trips are made with teammembers traveling to their opposite foreign location. Ideally the first trip occurs near the initiation of theproject for planning, organizing and conceptualization. This early face to face meeting has been found tofacilitate the formation of personal relationships that endure during the project execution and enhanceboth the outcome of the project and the cultural experience. To further enhance the experience, duringeach visit, the visiting students are lodged with the host students for a total emersion into the culture ofthe country. The framework of this international capstone project addresses key variables identified asnecessary for maximum impact: customers
within the constructionism approach that underlies thepedagogical philosophy of this study. The project to develop the CooL:SLiCE cyberlearningplatform and planned evaluations within this cyber environment are next discussed.CooL:SLiCE Cyberlearning Environment The CooL:SLiCE project supports sustainable engineering education by leveragingcyber-technology’s role in learning environmentally responsible lifecycle engineering. A multi-institutional team of researchers from Wayne State, Penn State, and Oregon State universities arecollaboratively developing the innovative distributed cyberlearning platform to facilitate students’consideration of the range of human controlled and initiated impacts products have on the naturalenvironment. The
, three assessment tools were developed.1. CRP Proposal. The student teams propose their product in the form of a short memo report describing their product selection, parameter selection and the initial design of experiments (testing methodology). The proposal provides an opportunity for instructor feedback on the team-specific project plan. Often resubmissions are requested for clarity or alternative experimental plan. The instructor must approve the proposal before purchases can be made.2. Project Workspace. The students maintained a PBWorks.com12 workspace to document their progress, tabulate raw data, and manage their team efforts. PBWorks.com is web-based management tool designed as wiki-styled pages for collaborative projects
Engineering, Smith College, and UMass – Amherst). Their research analyzedpersistence in engineering and related STEM majors as well as career interests. The studytested the hypothesis that the primary causes of underrepresentation of women in STEMincluded women having a lower self-assessment in STEM skills compared to males, aswell as family planning and work – life balance issues. Cech et al. also established a newcategory of a self-assessed “Professional Role Confidence,” which they defined asmeasuring the personal comfort level that a qualified female feels with fitting intoengineering as a career. Men reported a significantly higher comfort level compared towomen with respect to Professional Role Confidence.The prospect that gender influences
andinvestigation of more complex circuits, and 3) use of open-source software such as FreeMat fordeveloping analytic solutions to complex circuits. We plan to alternate between the threemodalities (hands-on, circuit simulation, numerical analysis) throughout the term. Hands-onactivities will involve setting up basic circuit law and series/parallel experiments; basic first-order RC and RL step response; building and measuring an audio amplifier using an op-amp;working with diodes and transistors as light emitters and switches as well as in switching circuitsfor motor control; use of photo, IR and ultrasound sensors in a microcontroller application, withassociated conditioning circuits; and characterizing frequency response of first- and second
establishingstructure,14 such as keeping the team on schedule and assigning tasks, and broader descriptorssuch as “getting things done” and making decisions. The fact that all team members consideredbehaviors in this category as indicators of leadership was unsurprising given the project-orientednature of the competitions.For both teams, organizing the team to achieve a goal was the most common project-management behavior mentioned. Many team members associated “making sure everything getsdone” with leadership, a perspective corresponding the functional leadership models.17, 18, 21 Asexplained by a team officer with extensive leadership role experience, “You have to show thatyou’ve thought things out, you have a plan, and that you’re going to execute it
into two equally largesubsets to analyze the effect of year of graduation.Table 5 shows the comparison between the results of recent years and earlier years. In Table 5,column 2 shows the resulting RankDists obtained on the entire data set; column 3 shows theresulting RankDists obtained on the data set from 1949 to 1994; column 4 shows the resultingRankDists applied on the data set from 1995 to 2014.The RankDist values in column 4 are all smaller than those in column 3, indicating that recentyear data reflects the U.S. News ranking better than earlier year data. In the future, we plan toemploy a weight differential model based on the year of hiring to make the rankings moresensitive to recent year data.Figure 2 shows the ranking divergence of
Planning Communications General Knowledge Professional Impact Continuous Learning Initiative Quality Orientation Cultural Adaptability Innovation Safety Awareness Customer Focus Integrity Teamwork The key actions are designed to validate experiential learning in an engineering workenvironment through clear, definable, instantly measureable, and readily observable metrics thatare consistent with the visions and missions of Iowa State University and the College ofEngineering. They “align with existing employer assessment, development and performancemanagement practices” [4, p. 124
studies that can help improve teaching, learning, and educational policy decision makings using both quantitative and qual- itative research methods. Her current research project in National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter) focuses on measuring engineering students’ entrepreneurial interests and related individual characteristics. Her Ph.D. dissertation involved using statistical modeling methods to explain and predict engineering students’ success outcomes, such as retention, academic performance, and grad- uation.Mr. Calvin Ling, Stanford UniversityMr. Florian Michael Lintl, Stanford University Florian is studying Environmental Planning and Ecological Engineering at the Technical University
areas of creative design, machine design, fluid power control, and engineering education.Alexa Coburn, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Alexa is a third year Mechanical Engineering student from Huntington Beach, California. She attends Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo and plans on graduating in June 2016. Alexa recently had a Space Operations internship at Raytheon Space and Airborne Systems and plans to go back for a second internship this summer. While attending school, Alexa is a part of an educational research team where she develops hands-on learning activities that facilitate student understanding of dynamics concepts. Alexa is passion- ate about working with children and young adults
chairs USC’s STEM Consortium.Dr. Cheryl Matherly Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education at The University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Dr. Matherly’ directs the NanoJapan program, funded by the National Science Foundation in order to expand international research opportunities for students in STEM fields. She is the recipient of two Fulbright grants for international education administrators (Germany and Japan.) She has an Ed.D. in Education Leadership and Culture Studies from the University of Houston.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and
include effects of student-centered active learning, self-regulated learning, and incor- porating engineering into secondary science and mathematics classrooms. Her education includes a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Dr. Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa Dr. Cheryl Matherly is Vice Provost for Global Education at The University of Tulsa, where she has responsibility for the strategic leadership of the university’s plan for comprehensive internationalization. Page 26.186.1 Dr. Matherly’ co-directs the NanoJapan
participants with the five Q-sets that represent thefull range across the aspects of out-of-class involvement being investigated and asking theparticipants to rank the statements on the cards according to provided instructions. The itemswere developed from the literature reviews and a practice focus group held with four AfricanAmerican college students. The Q-sets focused on five themes: reasons for participating in out-of-class activities, reasons for not participating in out-of-class activities, types of out-of-classactivities in which they participate or plan to participate, positive outcomes of participation, andnegative outcomes participation. Each set of cards was discussed in four steps: brainstorm, compare and record, sort and rank