underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and multivariable
professional careers. Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) is theemerging project delivery method of the time and is often accompanied by the use of BuildingInformation Modeling (BIM). Construction management programs across the nation haveadapted to the changing industry needs and trends by incorporating IPD and BIM into existingcourses or creating new courses. Although educating students about the differences between IPDand other more traditional project delivery methods is seemingly straightforward, teaching thecollaborative skills needed for IPD is difficult, especially when students lack the discipline-specific expertise upon which IPD relies. These educational challenges make the relationshipbetween industry and academia of utmost importance.This
GK-12 Outreach Program] improved fellows’ communication skills, increasedtheir sense of community involvement, and impacted career and future plans of theundergraduate fellows.” 9As one, male, engineering undergraduate stated, “If you cancommunicate with 8-year-olds, then communicating with everyone else becomes less of achallenge” 9 Page 26.1528.3 Figure 1: The Model – Energy Engineering and Education Outreach Student 2The Model evolved from the author’s graduate experience working with two programs describedlater in the paper. Both programs have been successful at North Carolina State University.There were many lessons learned 2
overarching assessment methodology.In an extensive review of the literature, Seymour and colleagues reviewed published studies andconference proceedings examining the impact of undergraduate research experiences on studentoutcomes 4. Based on their review, they clustered the most commonly indicated benefits tostudents of such programs. These included: increased interest in specific areas of research andstudy among participating students; increased recruitment of underrepresented groups inresearch-based experiences; gains in research and research-based skills; clarification, refinement,and confirmation of educational- and/or career-related goals; increases in the understanding ofthe research process; and increases in both self-confidence of ability
research allows them to learn about recent discoveries and innovations,share about them in the classroom, and thereby encourage and stimulate students to pursueengineering and computer science careers such as industrial automation. The paper will describeprogram activities, research projects, outcomes, and lessons learned from a National ScienceFoundation-sponsored Research Experiences for Teachers program. Participants were recruitedfrom science, technology, engineering and math departments in high schools and collegesthroughout the U.S. Special effort was made to recruit teachers and instructors from districts andtwo-year colleges with large numbers of underrepresented minority students. Program objectiveswere to 1) provide opportunities for
workers in industrial automation andcontrol. In addition, it is necessary to invest in research to help maintain America’s leadership inthese areas. This paper describes a summer program designed to provide a research environmentfor undergraduate students to learn about mechatronics, robotics, and automated system design.The goal is to help participants to understand the research process, to acquire laboratory skills, toexpand their perspectives on science and engineering research, and to have a lasting influence ontheir career paths. Participants spent 10 weeks working on a research project with a mentor and agraduate student. Survey data suggests that students learned from the research experience andwill build on the experience in pursuing
management, architecture, and civilengineering programs (2-year, 4-year, and graduate degrees, 950 in total), only seven percentprovide courses with IRC related learning outcomes. A follow-up national survey toconstruction, architecture and civil engineering faculty suggests the barriers to teach codes arethe lack of available resources and low cognitive student learning perceived in teaching about theIRC. In response to these findings an online course was developed. Students learn how codeswill influence their professional careers, identifying the difference between prescriptive andperformance based codes and communicating how codes relate to the performance of a structure.Student learning outcomes are created through multiple active learning
, ecosystems, careers, diversity and curriculum. This round ofcategorization was done by two investigators sequentially; first one investigator, then theother (working from the first investigator’s coding), followed by discussion to come toagreement.This second round of coding was refined by revisiting actual worksheets to better understandthe context of questions, going back to some of the question-authors for clarification, andallowing for classification not just of complete questions, but also the larger issues embeddedin some of the questions.4.2 Key Themes IdentifiedFive themes emerged from categorizing the 46 questions that were written by Summitattendees in the “Re-search” session. These are: 1) Educational Aims, 2) Students Are Not Allthe Same
Engineering Concepts to Harness Future Innovators and Technologists) project. Professor Harriger’s current interests include application development, outreach to K-12 to interest more students to pursue computing careers, applying IT skills to innovating fitness tools, and wearable computing.Prof. Bradley C. Harriger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Brad Harriger has over 30 years of experience teaching automated manufacturing and has authored/co- authored several related articles. Professor Harriger has served in several leadership roles with Society of Manufacturing Engineers and the American Society for Engineering Education, and is a founding mem- ber of an international Aerospace Automation Consortium, serving on
Paper ID #13434Aligning ”making” with Manufacturing Technology EducationDr. Marilyn Barger, FLATE: Florida Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence Dr. Marilyn Barger is the Principal Investigator and Executive Director of FLATE, the Florida Regional Center of Excellence for Advanced Technological Education, funded by the National Science Founda- tion and housed at Hillsborough Community College in Tampa, Florida since 2004. FLATE serves the state of Florida as its region and is involved in outreach and recruitment of students into technical career pathways; has produced award winning curriculum design and
and future career field, such as advisors, faculty members from whom they takeclasses, professors in their major, internship supervisors, employers or administrators, andthrough volunteer/community activities, seminars/workshops, and conferences. The pathway-to-graduate school strategy is intended to encourage all promising undergraduate students toapply for graduate school and assist them in creating a portfolio which will make themcompetitive to receive financial support. This strategy enriches the intellectual fabric of theUniversity by developing a mechanism that integrates the experience and expertise of theengineering undergraduate students into the College’s scholarship – such as conducting researchand presenting the findings. UC is
DevelopmentIntroductionAlbert Einstein once said, “intellectual growth should commence at birth and cease only atdeath.” 1 To develop students who can achieve lifelong learning is a goal of higher education.2Because lifelong learning is vital to an engineer's career, the accreditation board for engineeringand technology (ABET) included lifelong learning as one of its student outcomes. ABET statesthat by graduation students should have "a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage inlife-long learning."3At The Ohio State University’s Engineering Education Innovation Center (EEIC), students areoffered a wide range of engineering courses through the first-year engineering program and asenior-year multidisciplinary capstone program. A requirement for all first
professionaldevelopment opportunity. The workshops will be offered to all undergraduate engineeringstudents at one medium size university. In the workshops, participants will engage in facilitatedguided reflection exercises designed to elicit their thoughts and descriptions about who they areand their purpose in their engineering studies. Participants will be asked to write a personalstatement on how they see themselves in their studies and how they envision the person theywish to become in their future career. Page 26.742.2This paper presents the work in progress of this research study, highlighting the researchapproach, methods, and design. Future plans
Electronics Engineering Technology program went through a change infocus, a major curriculum revision, and a name change. The Electronic Systems EngineeringTechnology (ESET) program, as it is now named, has a strong focus on embedded system-basedproduct and system development3 and prepares students for long-term careers that cut acrossmany industry sectors including automotive, energy, oil/gas, communications, medicaltechnology, semiconductor and quality-of-life. In fact, the value proposition of offering anexperiential learning-based degree that prepares students for careers in electronics-based productdevelopment has proven to resonate well with both transfer and freshman students and has had asignificant impact on recruiting and outreach. In
. Page 26.492.9 Figure 7. Former students/employees who have moved onto careers in healthcare. In afew short years, the center has helped students bridge the gap from academia to industry. Page 26.492.10 Question 1: Understanding of healthcare systems and their problems 20 15 Sample size = 19 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Question 2: Understanding of how I.E. can be applied to health
career Current 10 1.50 0.527 opportunities in your subject I am confident about teaching the Previous 8 3.38 0.518 0.029 application of my subject to everyday Current 10 2.90 0.316 life During the last 12 months, how much Previous 8 51.63 47.848 0.0231 PD have you participated in for Current 10 2.80 6.546 interdisciplinary collaboration (hours) *Significant at α = .05 1 Did not pass for equality of variances; therefore Satterthwaite method was usedTables 2-4 report the results of the statistical analysis when comparing the results of the pre- andpost-program surveys for the current
an assistant editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, has been a guest editor of Educational Psychology Review, served on editorial board for top educational research journals, and currently sits on the editorial board of Learn- ing and Instruction. In 2006 she was awarded the U.S. National Science Foundation CAREER grant award and received the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers from the President of the United States. She has conducted and advised on educational research projects and grants in both the public and private sectors, and served as an external reviewer for doctoral dissertations outside the U.S. She publishes regularly in peer-reviewed journals and books. Dr. Husman
in theConstruction Science Management (CSM) degree plan in the Engineering TechnologyDepartment at Texas State University and is a required course for the American Council forConstruction Education (ACCE) accreditation. Additionally, the ACCE accreditation requires aspecific course outcome related to using modern technology to solve construction relatedproblems through the use of computers in the scheduling of construction projects. It has becomeincreasingly essential for students pursuing a career in the construction industry to have anunderstanding of Project Management Software (PMS)7-10. Therefore, it is required and vital tothe students’ education to learn how to use modern PMS. The CPMS course at Texas State University has been
, and engaging her students with interactive methods.Mr. David B Kanipe, Texas A&M University After receiving a BS in Aerospace Engineering in May 1970, followed by a MS in Aerospace Engineering in August 1971 from Texas A&M University, Mr. Kanipe accepted a position with NASA at the Manned Spacecraft Center in Houston and began his professional career in November 1972. A month after his arrival at NASA, the last Apollo mission, Apollo 17, was launched. Obviously, that was exciting, but in terms of his career, the commencement of the Space Shuttle Program in November 1972 was to have far more impact. As a result, David was able to begin his career working on what he says was the most interesting and
, yet rewarding, challenge withinundergraduate engineering programs. Effective writing and presentation skills are valuable forany profession. Effective communication skills, however, don’t just happen, especially for someengineering students as a strong preference to developing analytical and problem solving skillsisn’t uncommon. It can be difficult to develop communication skills that are likely to affectstudent’s careers during a time where they often do not hold them in high regard.The materials area within the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at MississippiState University (MSU) repeatedly experiences the situation described in the aforementionedparagraph. For example, it is much easier to motivate many students to calculate
Paper ID #13613Engineering students teaching hands on engineering design challenges to un-derserved community familiesDr. Amy Hee Kim, Iridescent Amy Kim is the Sr. Director of Content Development at Iridescent, a science and engineering education nonprofit. She is trained in physical chemistry (Ph.D. University of Chicago) with a strong passion for improving STEM education in informal settings. In graduate school, she chose to pursue a career path where scientists can give back to their communities. She was a science policy fellow at the National Academy of Sciences where she learned how to effectively communicate
Paper ID #13155A Hands-on Project approach to Teaching Solid ModelingProf. Randy Shih, Oregon Institute of Technology Randy Shih is a Professor in the Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering and Technology Department at Oregon Institute of Technology. He worked as a design engineer in the automobile sector prior to starting his teaching career in 1984. He has over 30 years of experiences in the areas of CAD/CAE; and he is the author of fifteen CAD/CAE textbooks that are currently being used by many universities and colleges in North America
a current task as being useful forreaching a desired future goal. Students’ perceptions of time can range from positive(i.e., time will make things better) to negative (i.e., current living standards will notimprove over time). The three elements of FTP create connections between morestable long-term career goals and short-term tasks to understand the actions taken bystudents. Students with positive FTPs have been shown to possess and use traitsrelated to increased learning, retention, and valuing of tasks.For this study, FTP was operationalized to assess students’ time orientations in termsof their perceptions of the future in relation to their engineering degree and theirdesire to be an engineer, and their perceived instrumentality of
organizations are encouraged to “bid” on community projects suggested by the South Bend Department of Public Works to apply both technical and leadership skills. These projects have a broader range of stakeholders and more complex constraints than typical academic projects, and participants are Page 26.1577.2 expected to progress from an apprentice to journeyman level of mastery of leadership skills. Continuing Executive Engineering Leadership Education: This offering is designed to support alumni and other engineering professions through key leadership transitions throughout their careers as the progress
c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Training for Leadership and Team Skills from Freshman Year ForwardLeadership and small-group skills for engineers are not only important for interacting with the 3-5 people on a design team during their academic career, but for performing well on professionalengineering teams, which often include customers, support personnel (who are not engineers),and other constituencies in the workplace. This issue is best captured with this quote from Mr.Bock of Google, “What we care about is, when faced with a problem and you're a member of ateam, do you, at the appropriate time, step in and lead. And just as critically, do you step back....". 1Our work
academies for students have been used, and anecdotal informationsuggests that they have had some amount of success. However, while students tend to enjoy suchactivities and learn from them, this approach tends to have limited cost-effectiveness based onthe number of students impacted and the long term yield has not been well documented. Onepotential alternative approach is to target teachers, who play a critical role in the K-12 system.Each teacher interacts with dozens of students annually, and they can be extremely influential ontheir students’ educational and career choices. So, providing teachers valuable resources wouldhave a multiplicative effect in reaching students in the K-12 system. However, a vast majority ofthese teachers have little or
introducingsustainability concepts is two-fold: to enhance undergraduate students’ interest in andunderstanding of sustainability by engaging them in real-world sustainability projects; and toprovide students with necessary knowledge for advancing a career in sustainability withinCCEM. The vertically-integrated problem-based learning (PBL) framework developed in thecourse of this TUES project provides undergraduate students with both knowledge and toolsneeded to address urban sustainability issues in their future careers, whether in industry oracademe. This framework is replicable and can thus be deployed across universities as part of theCCEM curriculum.The PBL framework is developed and implemented at Arizona State University between alower-division construction
skills will be used in a practical setting.9–12 They also improve students’ non-technical skills, such as communication, teamwork, and project management, that are key to asuccessful career as a practicing engineer (and for most other career paths).9 In project-basedlearning, students must consider both the process and the product, as they collaborate on creatingthe deliverables for the project.13 Project work emphasizes learning by doing, and engineeringprojects that involve hands-on work and the generation of a physical prototype can be consideredto be a “mastery experience” that can both improve student learning and also increaseengineering self-efficacy.14,15 However, the benefits of generating a physical prototype accrue tothe students who
Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Continuous Improvement in an NSF S-STEM ProgramIntroductionIn conjunction with a National Science Foundation-sponsored scholarship program, we havedeveloped and maintained a multidisciplinary peer mentoring support system at a comprehensiveuniversity in the Midwest. This program is designed for STEM students and addresses keyprofessional development areas. The student scholars receive financial support and anopportunity to develop academic, professional and life skills through a weekly scholars’ seminar.The seminars familiarize scholars with various university support services, allow participation inmultidisciplinary discussions addressing broad academic and career issues, and
ReadinessAbstractColleges of Engineering have increasingly emphasized the importance of engineering studentsobtaining professional skills relating to global readiness. This paper describes progress in a cross-sectional, longitudinal study to examine the impact that a College of Engineering at a large, mid-Atlantic public institution has on students’ global readiness and related constructs. Data werecollected from first-year and senior undergraduate engineering students for two years (2012-2013and 2013-2014). Research questions examined: 1) previous international experiences of incomingstudents, 2) international experiences that undergraduates have during their academic careers, 3)students’ perceived value of global readiness, 4) activities students perceive to be