, and forthcoming results suggest a link between these experiences and the career trajectories of female scientists. She continues to perform research on issues of inclusion, identity, and diversity in science through collaborations with GAMES, the Committee for the Status of Women in Astronomy, and other organizations.Dr. Ayesha Sherita Tillman, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Ayesha Tillman is an Illinois -STEM Education Initiative postdoctoral research associate currently work- ing on several evaluations funded by the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health. Ayesha Tillman received her Bachelor of Science in Psychology from Arizona State Univer- sity and her Master of Arts in
Director of the Women in Engineering Program at RIT. She is responsible for the Page 26.1329.1 initiatives to inspire, educate, recruit, support and retain girls and women engineering students focused on engineering careers. She has a BS in Industrial Engineering and has worked with IBM and Kodak as an engineer and pursued a career in sales and marketing with both Kodak and Learning International. During her career sabbatical to raise her two boys, Jodi ran a successful direct sales business for 16 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015
, Andrea served as the Director of the Equal Opportunity in Engineering (EOE) Program at The University of Texas at Austin for 11 years. Andrea joined UT in 2001 after six years in industry, where she had a successful career as a structural engineer for Kellogg Brown & Root and HDR Engineering, Inc. As EOE Director, Andrea led Cockrell School of Engineering efforts to recruit and retain ethnically underrepresented students as well as students with backgrounds or experiences that contributed to the overall diversity of the School. During her term, Andrea raised more than $3.7 million in private and public grants to support the EOE program and its mission. While EOE was under her direction, UT Austin ranked as
-pointof the discussions, the individual groups would report to the larger group where large-groupdiscussions would follow. The four program directors and four graduate assistants also met as adiscussion group and participated in the overall group discussions by sharing our viewpoints andpast experiences with the larger group.Individual outside-group activities were used to reinforce group discussions. A series of weeklyjournaling assignments (4) focused on the scholars’ fears and anxieties about the new program;current and future academic expectations; future academic and career related activities; andmentorship. Weekly journaling prompts were based on themes generated by the individual peergroups during their discussion meetings. In their
Paretti, Virginia Tech Marie C. Paretti is an Associate Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech, where she co- directs the Virginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on com- munication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring com- munication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teach
-based categorization of writing tasks andprojects in undergraduate engineering curricula is critically formative in working toward theholistic integration of writing across courses for the sake of preparation and conceptual-basedstudent understanding of writing practices. Page 26.370.3Introduction Instructors who work in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) areasare aware that their students, particularly upper-division undergraduate students, often resistwriting. This happens despite various large-scale studies that emphasize the importance of writingto careers in STEM-related industries1-3. One cause of this
supported by parentswho themselves had both expectations and concerns about their children entering anexperimental pilot program. This paper explores those hopes and concerns, and facultymembers’ responses to them. Page 26.677.2Literature ReviewTransition to college life holds many promises of independence, new friends, experiences, andcareer prospects. However, along with the excitement comes anxiety and fear that mayundermine positive feelings and, if left unchecked, may make it difficult for some students tocontinue their academic career. After all, the freshman year is the toughest one students face intheir lifetime [1]. If these fears are not
Page 26.990.3global leader of innovation.Colleges of Engineering across the country and the globe are experiencing this reality. Feweryoung people enroll in engineering programs than in the past, and many who do either drop outof such programs at a high rate or become dissatisfied with their career options and seekemployment in other professions after graduating.8 The 2002 report, Engage to Excel, indicatesthat increasing retention is the most efficient way to boost STEM graduates, and identifies keychanges engineering faculty members can make to their curriculum and teaching to fosterretention. Key is the need for intellectual and personal engagement, something often stifled byuninspiring courses and unwelcoming faculty.7 Retention also
, function to privilege and perpetuate certainunderstandings of the field. Autoethnographic techniques are used to construct three accounts ofthe student’s encounters with an upper level administrator, various members of faculty, and anacademic advisor. Critical analysis of these experiences using a prior evidence-based model ofstories ‘told’ about engineering in the public discourse reveals tensions between the freshmanstudent’s values and career interests and the emergent, dominant discourse he observed in hisundergraduate program. These tensions are described in terms of: i) The prioritization of nationaleconomic recovery and growth over the life and career goals of individuals; ii) A predominantfocus on the quantitative and technical aspects of
member of the NASPA Center for Women National Board and co-founded the University of Michigan Women in Student Affairs chapter. Jennifer’s research interests include the culture of busy, the intersection of women’s higher education career ascension and professional development, and women’s leadership development. She is currently a doctoral student at New England College and holds her M.Ed. in Higher Education Student Affairs from the University of Vermont and a B.A from Oakland University.Mr. Stefan M Turcic II, University of Michigan Stefan Turcic is a recent graduate from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, MI, where he received his M.A. in Higher Education from the Center for the Study of Higher and
different language.Additionally, a summary of the development of the educational program in the Dominican Republic,including organization of content, selection and admission procedures and the general goals of theprogram will be presented. Finally, data based on a pre post survey instrument evaluating students’engineering self-efficacy and understanding and interest in engineering content and concepts, futureeducational and career opportunities, as well as satisfaction of the program will be presented. Additionaldata regarding the tracking of those Dominican students who have graduated from the program will alsobe shared to highlight the potential benefits of building a similar program.General findings include that Dominican students participating
design experiences throughout the four years, nurturing a solid foundation of professionalskills, such as teamwork and innovation.This research aims to discover if and how a learning community and group identity can beformed between engineering students with diverse career interests enrolled in a new, design-based multidisciplinary engineering degree program at a large public highly research-activeuniversity. Initial data indicates that students in this new GE+ degree program are still findingeach other and forming their community. Using mixed-methods analysis informed by educationresearch — including surveys and small focus groups — we explore the ways in whichcommunity is nurtured and hindered amongst the first-year and returning students
Paper ID #12972Implementation of a Novel Second-Year Mechanical Engineering Course tothe CurriculumProf. Sandra Anstaett Metzler P.E., Ohio State University Professor Sandra Anstaett Metzler received her B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from Purdue Univer- sity in 1983. Dr. Metzler received her M.S. in Mechanical Engineering and her D.Sc. in Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering from Washington University in St. Louis in 1997 and 2000, respectively. Dr. Metzler worked in the automotive industry for General Motors, beginning as a high-school intern in the Engineering Test Garage and continuing through her undergraduate career
provide many students with important opportunities fromwhich they can take away what is important and relevant to them.IntroductionThe graduate student experience is multidimensional. Being a graduate student includes manysocialization experiences that encompass the academic, social, and professional aspects ofgraduate education. Socialization in the sense that it is discussed in this paper aligns with thedescription offered by Ann Austin1: Socialization for doctoral students is largely about making sense of graduate school and the academic career, developing one's interests and areas of strength, determining how one's values and commitments relate to those in the profession, and developing one's own sense of place and
becomingproficient in them may require inculcation throughout a student’s academic career. It may beinstructional for students to experience interdisciplinary courses and even projects for whichstudents could take full responsibility: from assessing requirements, designing an initial plan,assigning and managing workload, to creating a prototype and collaboration with other studentsand faculty.Badges as Competency Credentialing and Life-Long LearningThe challenges that emerge with teaching competencies required for the 21st century are alsoaligned with challenges of evaluating and credentialing those competencies in the classroomsetting and “selling” them to a potential employer. Recently, digital badges or microcredentialshave gained attention in the world
that any analysis that does nottake intersectionality into account does not adequately address the manner in which Blackwomen are subordinated16. Being sure to look at the Black woman as she is, both a woman and ablack person, is both powerful and insightful. The studies in this literature review use anintersectionality lens by looking specifically at African American women.For the African American woman faculty member oppressions take the form of invisibility,isolation, and other barriers that stand in the way of career advancement as faculty. Malcom,Hall, & Brown discovered in their analysis almost forty years ago that, “[t]he more an individualresembles the ‘typical scientist’ the lower are the costs. Each deviation from the norm raises
, re- spectively, from the University of Minnesota. His B.S., in Biochemistry and Neuroscience with a Com- puter Science minor, is also from the University of Minnesota (2003). His research interests include secure distributed systems, low-power computing and ad-hoc networking, and security usability. In 2013 he received the NSF CAREER award for work on secure next-generation medical systems.Dr. Eleanor C Sayre, Kansas State University Eleanor Sayre is a researcher in physics education, specializing in the intersection of undergraduate stu- dents’ epistemologies, identity development, and community participation. Her PhD in physics is from the University of Maine, and she is currently an Assistant Professor in the
engineering education. He was trained as a Manufacturing Process Specialist within the textile industry, which was part of an eleven- year career that spanned textile manufacturing to product development.Dr. Justin J HenriquesMr. Sancho Sequeira Page 26.509.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015Work in progress: Development and Implementation of a Cornerstone Course: Engineering Opportunities Abstract In response to the vision presented in the Engineer of 2020 Project, many engineeringeducators are redesigning courses
electrokinetics, predominantly di- electrophoretic characterizations of cells, and the development of biomedical microdevices. She earned a NSF CAREER award and was nominated for Michigan Professor of the Year in 2014. Research within her Medical micro-Device Engineering Research Laboratory (M.D. – ERL) also inspires the development of Desktop Experiment Modules (DEMos) for use in chemical engineering classrooms or as outreach activi- ties in area schools (see www.mderl.org). Adrienne is currently co-Chair of ASEE’s Diversity Committee and PIC I Chair; she has previously served on WIED, ChED, and NEE leadership teams and contributed to 37 ASEE conference proceedings articles.Dr. Ann Saterbak, Rice UniversityDr. Jennifer Cole
Page 26.643.8Table 3: Interview Questions - End of Sophomore Year 1. Are you still a _______ major? (If not: why did you switch? [Move to SWITCHER set of questions]) How is the second year going? What are some big events that occurred in the last year? What are some things you have enjoyed? Found difficult or frustrating? 2. Why do you like engineering? What is motivating you through the tough classes? a. What are your particular interests within _______ engineering? 3. What is your ideal career now? Why? 4. What are some specific qualities of a job and company that you are looking for? Why are these qualities important? a. Do you already know of companies where you’d like to work? If so, which ones? b. Which quality is the most
called AerosPACE. All authors are former students who took theAerosPACE course. The paper does not present a rigorous research approach, but rather,particular focus is placed on the first-hand student experience and consequent translation oflearned skills into the workforce. The evolution of the industry-sponsored program is outlinedincluding lessons-learned, student experiences and achievements. A methodology which otherindustry sponsors could use to replicate and scale similar projects in other fields is discussed. Toconclude the paper, the authors (all alumni of the program who are now working in industry)offer their thoughts on how the program has impacted their early careers in industry.IntroductionPrior to reviewing the project in
meet ever increasing societal demands. Nine of 24 outcomes are focused onprofessional skills, describe student skills needed to meet career challenges, and include targetlevels of cognitive development required to prepare students for professional practice.Based on this vision for future engineers set forth in ASCE BOK 2, faculty in The CitadelDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) adopted 22 student outcomes, eightof which are directly focused on developing student professional skills and competencies. Theseoutcomes are mapped across a subset of the 34 courses offered in the civil engineeringcurriculum. Embedded indicators are used to measure student attainment of the material andresults are compared to established Department
of a capstone design instructor workshop forthe 2014 Capstone Design Conference.1. IntroductionEngineering capstone design projects are intended to provide a culminating experience forseniors where they solve a complex, open-ended design challenge that requires the integration ofmany of the engineering concepts mastered over their undergraduate careers. The students are intheir final year of study and are preparing to transition out to the workforce, graduate studies, orto the military or public service.According to the 2005 comprehensive national survey of capstone design programs conducted byHowe[1], 98% of the 444 engineering programs at the 262 responding institutions (representingabout 26% of all programs) included capstone projects as
underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering.Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez, Arizona State University Prior to joining the ASU Electrical Engineering faculty in 1990, Dr. Armando A. Rodriguez worked at MIT, IBM, AT&T Bell Laboratories and Raytheon Missile Systems. He has also consulted for Eglin Air Force Base, Boeing Defense and Space Systems, Honeywell and NASA. He has published over 200 tech- nical papers in refereed journals and conference proceedings – over 60 with students. He has authored three engineering texts on classical controls, linear systems, and multivariable
course topics were developed.Student Learning OutcomesBy the end of the course, students should be able to: 1) Great each student in the class by their first and last name. 2) Convey to another person a broad notion of “What is engineering?” 3) Set both short- and long-term goals in their academic careers. 4) Create (and stick to) a personal schedule for studying. 5) Understand their preferred learning style and be aware of all learning styles. 6) Be aware of the resources available to them for tutoring, academic advice, personal advice, and professional advice. 7) Work cohesively and effectively as a member of a team. 8) Communicate their ideas in both verbal and written form. Table 1. ENGR 204
survey, the alumni of WPI’s program attributed elements of career and professionalsuccess to their project-based learning experiences8. These findings are not surprising, as theyare consistent with research that discusses employers’ reports of the abilities and skills neededfor success in the engineering profession. Furthermore, the study found that female alumnireported more positive impacts than males in 36 of 39 areas, suggesting that project-basedlearning could also be an effective strategy for attracting and retaining women in engineering9.Nonetheless, some engineering educators remain skeptical about project-based and experientialeducation, and initiatives to substantively engage engineering students in authentic work remainthe exception
describe key components ofthe efforts, share feedback from our NC CC colleagues and transfer students, and discuss bestpractices for other institutions seeking to create or strengthen their ties with community colleges.Background and motivation Page 26.296.2American students are more and more utilizing the community college system as a steppingstone to access four-year institutions. While students seeking a variety of bachelor’s degreesbegin at community college, the pathway has become a particularly viable means for studentspursuing STEM degrees. In fact, a 2005 study estimated that 20% of engineering degree holdersbegan their academic careers
tools and application and having also total quality management diploma and being quality master holder dealing with all quality systems as documentation , CAPA management , RCA , facility maintenance and also ISO 9000/2008 expert in addition to being certified from Bernard Castle in UK as sterile area facility Design expert as per ISO regulations . Egyptian pharmacist graduate of 2007 who started my career as a research and development pharmacist in SEDICO pharmaceuticals in EGYPT for about 2 years dealing with new dosage forms formulation and then rotated to Methodology and stability department in which i dealt with dosage form analysis and innovation of new methods of analysis dealing with all laboratory
University. He teaches context-centered electrical engineering and embedded systems design courses, and studies the use of context in both K-12 and undergraduate engineering design education. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2010) and M.S./B.S. in Electrical and Com- puter Engineering from Purdue University. Dr. Jordan is PI on several NSF-funded projects related to design, including an NSF Early CAREER Award entitled ”CAREER: Engineering Design Across Navajo Culture, Community, and Society” and ”Might Young Makers be the Engineers of the Future?” He has also been part of the teaching team for NSF’s Innovation Corps for Learning, and was named one of ASEE PRISM’s ”20 Faculty Under 40” in 2014. Dr
concern or question expressed on pre-experience survey was: how can successfulwomen achieve work/life balance and have success in both family and career? Other commonconcerns expressed by participants on the pre-program surveys included: overcoming feelings of“inadequacy” or the imposter syndrome;1 how to speak up when silenced, interrupted, orignored; and how to negotiate for what participants need to be successful.The qualitative responses, both on the pre-program survey and from observations of discussionin the first session, suggest a deeper motivation for participating: many participants feel isolatedin their work. For the participants in this project, the presence of a structured and facilitatedprogram offered certain advantages over less