Conference Session

Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alma H. Rosales, Colorado State University; Andrea M. Leland, Colorado State University; Olivera Notaros, Colorado State University, ECE Department; Richard F. Toftness, IEEE High Plains Section; Thomas J. Siller, Colorado State University; Michael A. De Miranda Ph.D., Colorado State University; Alistair Cook, Colorado State University; Melissa D. Reese, Colorado State University; Zinta S. Byrne, Colorado State University; James Warren Weston, Colorado State University; Anthony A. Maciejewski, Colorado State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Figure 1: New teaching and learning model with a thread dedicated to professional formation(research, design, and optimization tools), and professionalism (communication, culturaladaptability, ethics, leadership, and teamwork).The professional formation thread – While the new pedagogical and organizational modeldramatically changes the educational landscape in the department, with broad impacts to theculture and discipline as a whole, this paper focuses on the professional formation thread, anddiscusses how the innovative structure provides a framework for developing professional skillsmore effectively and meaningfully. It examines the important role of the professional formationthread champion – a former Fortune 500 executive – and her

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bingbing Li, California State University - Northridge; Robert G. Ryan, California State University - Northridge; Nancy Warter-Perez, California State University - Los Angeles; Yong Gan, Cal Poly Pomona; Hadil Mustafa, California State University - Chico; Helen Cox, Institute for Sustainability, California State University - Northridge; Li Ding, California State University - Northridge

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

engineers who are critical thinkers, engage inhumanistic inquiry, have awareness of ethical and social justice issues, and are innovators andgood citizens. In fact, these qualities have been included in the “A to K” learning outcomesdefined by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) for all engineeringprograms [2]. Of these eleven learning outcomes, there are four that are most relevant to liberalstudies education: (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context; (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning; (j) a

Conference Session

Assessment I: Developing Assessment Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

So Yoon Yoon, Texas A&M University; P.K. Imbrie, Texas A&M University; Teri Kristine Reed, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

students, exploratory factor analyses identified an underlying factor structure of thescale with 38 items loaded onto one of five factors (Leadership Opportunity, Team Motivation,Engineering Practice, Innovative Changes, and Ethical Actions and Integrity), along with goodreliability evidence.I. Introduction “Our aspiration is to shape the engineering curriculum for 2020 so as to be responsive to the disparate learning styles of different student populations and attractive for all those seeking a full and well-rounded education that prepares a person for a creative and productive life and positions of leadership” (p. 52)1.As we face rapid changes in technology, society, and the world, the National Academy ofEngineering

Conference Session

Student Teams, Groups, and Collaborations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori C. Bland, George Mason University; Stephanie Marie Kusano, University of Michigan; Aditya Johri, George Mason University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

discussed most oftenas cognitions, behaviors, and dispositions. We organized these into three broad categories:self-management, task management, and team management, which can be used as aframework for future research. By providing students the opportunity to own the problem andits outcomes, engineering competitions can empower students to think like, act as, andbecome professional engineers.IntroductionEngineering is a professional discipline. Engineers work largely within professional codes ofconduct and are often required to obtain professional licensure to practice. As a professional,they are not only required to abide by certain codes – such as ethics – but are also expected togain skills such as being able to communicate effectively

Conference Session

Student Success III: Affect and Attitudes

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cole H. Joslyn, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Morgan M. Hynes, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, cannot be addressed with technical knowledge alone. The interdisciplinary nature ofengineering and these complex challenges require engineers with diverse experiences,knowledge, perspectives, skills, etc. However, current preparation of engineers often leaves themunsure about their role in society1. Therefore, it is necessary that we better prepare engineers tooperate in social contexts considering both historical and contemporary issues with ethical,economic, global, political, and environmental impacts. It is also necessary for engineers todevelop as persons able to critically examine the presuppositions of beliefs and value systemsbased on the perspectives and opinions of others rather than passively accepting them as reality. The

Conference Session

Research Methods II: Meeting the Challenges of Engineering Education Research

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nathan E Canney, Seattle University; Angela R. Bielefeldt, University of Colorado - Boulder; Greg Rulifson P.E., University of Colorado - Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Paper ID #14697Exploring Interviews as Validity Evidence for the Engineering ProfessionalResponsibility AssessmentDr. Nathan E Canney, Seattle University Dr. Canney teaches civil engineering at Seattle University. His research focuses on engineering educa- tion, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and the role of the public in engineering decisions. Dr. Canney re- ceived bachelors degrees in Civil Engineering and Mathematics from Seattle University, a masters in Civil Engineering from Stanford University with an emphasis

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Innovation Through Propagation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

current research focuses on three distinct but highly correlated areas – innovative design and entrepreneurship, engineering modeling, and global competency in engineering. She is currently associate editor for the AEE Journal.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering

Conference Session

Student Success II: Self-Regulatory, Metacognitive, and Professional Skills

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Aubrey Wigner, Arizona State University; Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Shawn S. Jordan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

software forthe following categories.20 Table 3: ABET Criteria 3 - Student Outcomes a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility

Conference Session

Student Teams, Groups, and Collaborations

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maya Rucks, Louisiana Tech University; Marisa K. Orr, Louisiana Tech University; David E. Hall, Louisiana Tech University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

responsibility is the desire to dosomething to meet societal needs. Vanzdoort discusses the micro levels of social responsibilitysuch as ethical codes for engineers and macro levels of social responsibility such as societaldecisions about technology. He states that knowledge of the social aspects of engineering isnecessary because of the environment in which engineers work [1]. Research also suggests thatthere is a need for global competence in the engineering profession. Lohmann, Rollins, and Hoeyresearched the importance of learning about cultures and issues worldwide [2]. Their studyconcluded that international study is key to becoming a successful global engineer. Thoughtechnical skills are necessary, they are not sufficient. To obtain ABET

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Innovation Through Propagation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Susan M. Lord, University of San Diego; Denise Rutledge Simmons P.E., Virginia Tech; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education, Shuman is the Founding Editor of Advances in Engineering Education. He has published widely in engineering education literature, and is co-author of Engineering Ethics: Balancing Cost, Schedule and Risk - Lessons Learned from the Space Shuttle (Cambridge University Press). He received his Ph.D. from the Johns Hopkins University in Operations Research and a B.S.E.E. from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Shuman is an ASEE Fellow

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Innovation Through Propagation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

from Purdue University. Her research is focused on identifying how model-based cognition in STEM can be better supported by means of expert technological and computing tools such as cyber-physical systems, visualizations and modeling and simulation tools.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Innovation Through Propagation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Program Evaluator, the Editor-in- Chief for the IEEE Transactions on Education, a Senior Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education, and an Associate Editor for the International Journal of STEM Education.Dr. Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh Larry J. Shuman is Senior Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Distinguished Service Professor of industrial engineering at the Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh. His research focuses on improving the engineering education experience with an emphasis on assessment of design and problem solving, and the study of the ethical behavior of engineers and engineering managers. A former Senior Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education

Conference Session

Research Methods II: Meeting the Challenges of Engineering Education Research

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Maura J. Borrego, University of Texas - Austin; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Lisa R. Lattuca, University of Michigan; Prateek Shekhar, University of Texas - Austin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

investigation of the ethical behavior of engineering undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 101(2): p. 346.10. Holsapple, M.A., et al., Framing faculty and student discrepancies in engineering ethics education delivery. Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 101(2): p. 169.11. Burt, B.A., et al., Out-of-classroom experiences: Bridging the disconnect between the classroom, the engineering workforce, and ethical development. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2013. 29(3): p. 714-725.12. Finelli, C.J., et al., An Assessment of Engineering Students' Curricular and Co‐ Curricular Experiences and Their Ethical Development. Journal of Engineering Education, 2012. 101(3): p. 469-494.13

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Facilitating Student Success and Inclusion

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie P. Martin, Clemson University; Samuel S. Newton, Clemson University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

ensuring aspects of quality and validity ininterpretive research in engineering education for capturing the social reality under study17. Thisframework serves as a guide for both “making the data” and “handling the data” in qualitativework, establishing measures for process reliability and theoretical, pragmatic, procedural,communicative, and ethical validation17. An in-depth examination of our quality considerationsfor “making the data” can be found in our previous paper8. We are also currently developingquality assurance steps for “handling the data,” and will describe these steps in a futurepublication.Our qualitative research utilizes a one-on-one, semi-structured interview method8 derived fromMcIntosh’s “serial testimony” technique18,19. We

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yupeng Luo, California State University - Fresno; Wei Wu, California State University - Fresno; Zhanna Bagdasarov, California State University - Fresno

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

member of ASCE, a member of DBIA, Green Globes, and National Institute of Building Science. He is also a board member of USGBC Central California Chapter, and a Senior Fellow of the Environmental Leadership Program (ELP).Dr. Zhanna Bagdasarov, California State University - Fresno ”Dr. Zhanna Bagdasarov is an Assistant Professor of Management at California State University, Fresno. She received her Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from the University of Oklahoma. Her research interests focus on ethical decision making in organizational contexts, trust repair between leaders and subordinates, and the influence of emotions in the workplace. She has published her work in such outlets as Journal of Business

Conference Session

Assessment I: Developing Assessment Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Wajid Hussain, The Islamic University in Madinah; Fong K. Mak P.E., Gannon University; Mohammad Faroug Addas, The Islamic University in Madinah

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

categories with well-defined learninglevels selected for the classification of specific PIs. The Learning Domains Wheel wasimplemented with Venn diagrams to represent details of the relationship of popular learningdomains categories, interpersonal skills, and the types of knowledge. INTERPERSONAL IT skills Teamwork Affective Professional ethics Leadership Drawing Life-long learning

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Marcia Pool, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Rohit Bhargava, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; P. Scott Carney, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Dipanjan Pan, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Andrew Michael Smith, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

 Complete a research boot campFocus on foundations of engineering process and the (training on research skills,introduction scientific method, scientific writing and scientific writing, presentation,to cancer presentation, and literature research skills. All ethics, team-building andresearch, lectures are heavily weighted toward laboratory safety)—first offeringresearch discussion and student participation. Students was in conjunction with existinginitiation produce two videos (5 min each) in a team for REU boot camp a broader audience. Students identify a faculty

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Assessment and Research Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

George E. Hassoun, Notre Dame University - Louaize, Lebanon

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

of individual assessments (points in time) are stated, includingbreadth and depth limitations, coverage limitations, and circumstantial limitations.Since Nyquist-Shannon’s sampling theorem uses ideal sampling to address the question ofsampling frequency, and because ideal sampling is based on the so-called unit impulse function,the widely accepted one-or-two-hour exam is suggested as a practical approximation of the unitimpulse function. Under this assumption, it is argued that an adequately weighted homeworkassignment could also be considered as a practical approximation of the unit impulse function,provided a high ethical standard is adhered to. This brings up the issues of ethics and plagiarismin modern engineering schools, and the need

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Classroom Practice

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Emily Dringenberg, Kansas State University; Ruth E. H. Wertz, Valparaiso University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

of Engineering Education 26 (2010).10 Adams, R. S., Turns, J. & Atman, C. J. Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design studies 24, 275-294 (2003).11 Pavelich, M. J., Olds, B. M. & Miller, R. L. Real‐world problem solving in freshman‐sophomore engineering. New Directions for Teaching and Learning 1995, 45-54 (1995).12 Bucciarelli, L. L. Designing engineers. (MIT press, 1994).13 Downey, G. & Lucena, J. When students resist: Ethnography of a senior design experience in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education 19, 168-176 (2003).14 Perry, W. G. Forms of intellectual and ethical development. New York: Holt, Rinehart and

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia; Judith Shaul Norback, Georgia Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

; Civil&and&mechanical&engineering,&assessment&of&professional&ethics,& Mechanical&Engineering,& student&comprehension&from&&nonverbal& teaching&and&learning&in&engineering&education,&learning&through& Literacy/Philosophy& communication& historical&engineering&accomplishments,&engineering&management& U.S.&Military&Academy& Transdisciplinary&approach&to&developing& 5& Computer&science

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nebil Buyurgan, Missouri State University; Martin P. Jones, Missouri State University; Kevin M. Hubbard Ph.D., Missouri State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

translating an engineering design into a product, identifying ethical engineeringpractices and potential design failures, improving teamwork and communication skills. Theoptions evaluated for the new course included:  Option 1: Include engineering design process and group project content comprising approximately 10% of the course.  Option 2: Include engineering design process and group project content comprising approximately 25% of the course.  Option 3: Include engineering design process and group project content comprising approximately 50% of the course.  Option 4: Include engineering design process and group project content comprising approximately 75% of the course.The following factors are

Conference Session

Classroom Practice II: Technology - and Game-Based Learning

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bob Brennan P.Eng., University of Calgary; Lauren Vathje, University of Calgary; Marjan Eggermont, University of Calgary

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

approaches2,10.3. Design of the study3.1 Second-year computing tools for engineering designFollowing research ethics board approval, this study was conducted in the Fall 2015 term in theSchulich School of Engineering second year course, Mechanical Engineering 337 “ComputingTools for Engineering Design” – at the University of Calgary, Canada. This course is acontinuation of the first-year computing course, Engineering 233 “Computing for Engineers”,where students are introduced to computer systems and programming in a high-level language(Java11). The goal of this second-year course is to provide students with experience in applyinghigh-level software (in this case, MATLAB12) to the solution of mechanical engineering designproblems.Since its introduction

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Assessment and Research Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer Deboer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nick Stites, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Edward J. Berger, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jeffrey F. Rhoads, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Charles Morton Krousgrill, Purdue University, West Lafayette; David B. Nelson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Craig Zywicki, Purdue University; David A. Evenhouse, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Quality Engineering. His current work primarily investigates the effects of select emergent pedagogies upon student and instructor performance and experience at the collegiate level. Other interests include engineering ethics, engineering philosophy, and the intersecting concerns of engineering industry and higher academia. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 WIP: Rigorously Assessing the Anecdotal Evidence of Increased Student Persistence in an Active, Blended, and Collaborative Mechanical Engineering EnvironmentBackgroundThis work in progress describes an ongoing study of an active, blended, and collaborative (ABC)course environment used in a core mechanical

Conference Session

Research Methods I: Developing Research Tools and Methods

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Rachel Roberts, University of Washington School of Environmental and Forest Sciences; Denise Wilson, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

graduates.20 Validatingpsychographic measures that can assess these values is important to evaluating how well thegeneral university education is molding a next generation of consumers and professionalscommitted to more sustainable practices. However, within engineering, such psychographicmeasures also allow us to understand how well instruction in the ABET student outcome relatedto sustainable practice is likely to be internalized and pursued by engineering students throughlifelong learning: “an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability.” 21The National Academy of

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Learning and Engagement

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicholas D. Fila, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

incorporate appropriate qualitative validation methods wherever possible. Whilecommunicative and pragmatic validity are typically emphasized in phenomenographic work8,28,the additional elements of theoretical, procedural, and ethical validation, and process reliabilityfrom Walther and colleagues’ framework will also improve the quality of this work. Table 2,adapted from Walther and colleagues33,34, outlines these concepts and specific procedures used.This paper itself, and the resulting conference presentation, represent one critical step in ensuringthe quality and rigor of the work. In particular, by presenting this work, in an intermediate stage,to a variety of individuals, we receive feedback to support communicative validity8,11.Table 2

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Classroom Practice

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Bill D. Bailey, Kennesaw State University; Gregory L. Wiles P.E., Kennesaw State University; Thomas Reid Ball, Kennesaw State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

% HSOL 20% 10% 0% Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall Spring Fall 2009 2010 2010 2011 2011 2012 2012 Figure 2: Comparison of IET course enrollments by delivery type.18There are two courses that were not converted from traditional to hybrid. The first is a one credithour safety and ethics course. This course only meets 50 minutes per week, so there was littlebenefit in creating a hybrid. The other is the senior project. In this course, teams of studentsmeet with a faculty mentor at times arranged for each team. Although they were not

Conference Session

Communication Across the Divisions I

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Lori Breslow, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Christina Kay White, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Daniel E. Hastings, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods, Liberal Education/Engineering & Society

communicating cross-culturally or identifying problems within their team. The same holds true for visual literacy:Students rated their mechanistic skills like image editing or labeling higher than theirstrategic/critical ones. We assume that most of the students have edited or labeled photos beforeentering college because of their use of social media, so they are familiar with those activities. Incomparison, at each university students reported they were not confident in legal restrictions onuses of visual media. A discussion of these restrictions and proper citations for images can easilybe included either in professional communication courses or in the wide range of ethics coursesthat are already embedded in engineering programs.DiscussionThese

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Classroom Practice

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

M. Austin Creasy, Purdue University (Statewide Technology)

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

data has been used in bothclinical and classroom settings 11 where the video data is used to assess numerous topics relatedto education. Obtaining video data outside of a clinical or classroom setting introduces manydifficulties in the data collection design because of camera and microphone placement 14 andbecause of potential ethical issues related to capturing video data 11, 13. These difficulties need tobe considered in the design of an experiment when capturing video data for analysis and will bediscussed.Most assessment of student learning obtained from a learning cycle in courses similar to themechanics course used in this study uses closed ended questions 8, 17, 18. Closed ended questionshave a unique solution and usually only have a

Conference Session

Research Methods I: Developing Research Tools and Methods

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Freddy Solis, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Alexandra Coso Strong, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering; Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; David P. Crismond, City College of New York

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

situations that were not the specific ones studied? What is involved in making an SOI effort significant? Did it involve contradicting something considered “true”? What is involved in making an SOI effort ethical (e.g., being mindful of how other work is represented, being mindful of inclusion/exclusion)? Challenges and What kinds of challenges did you experience? Did an SOI framing help or hinder you? advice What kinds of challenges did you experience regarding publishing or communicating your work? What help do you wish you had? What advice would you offer to others? Outcomes What was

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Assessment and Research Tools

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Q. Li, University of New Haven; Ronald S. Harichandran, University of New Haven; Maria-Isabel Carnasciali, University of New Haven; Nadiye O. Erdil, University of New Haven; Jean Nocito-Gobel, University of New Haven

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

these characteristics. KEEN has defined 12secondary entrepreneurial behaviors as the learning outcomes grouped into the following fourcategories: Engineering Thought and Action: Apply creative thinking to ambiguous problems Apply systems thinking to complex problems Evaluate technical feasibility and economic drivers Examine societal and individual needs Collaboration: Form and work in teams Understand the motivations and perspectives of others Communication: Convey engineering solutions in economic terms Substantiate claims with data and facts Character: Identify personal passions and a plan for professional development Fulfill commitments in a timely manner Discern and pursue ethical practices