education students receive. This background allowed thecourse committee to design a course for non-technical majors which achieves learning objectivesthrough application of technical concepts. All graduates enter into a military career ascommissioned officers and are expected to make informed decisions on topics ranging from spaceoperations to routine military installation maintenance and management. To address this widerange of occupational responsibility, the primary learning goal is for the students to be able tointegrate and advocate for sustainability principles in plans and decisions affecting the builtenvironment at the conclusion of the course. Course design worked backwards to accomplish thisgoal beginning with the summative assessment and
Paper ID #23786Work in Progress: Biomedical Prototype Design in Collaborative Teams toIncrease Students’ Comprehension and EngagementKiersten Lenz, University of New Mexico Kiersten Lenz is a graduate student at the University of New Mexico in Biomedical Engineering. She has previous experience as a secondary science teacher at the high school level. Based on her observations as both a teacher and a student, Kiersten believes that the most effective way to teach is through creative lesson plans paired with collaborative problem-based learning.Prof. Eva Chi, University of New Mexico Eva Chi is an Associate Professor in
strives to provide a clear “roadmap” to STEM degree attainment[10], [11], [12], [13]. Scholarship recipients will develop degree plans early in their academictrajectory and will meet quarterly with a dedicated STEM academic advisor to monitor andevaluate their progress towards the Associate in Science Transfer (AS-T) degree. Many WCCSTEM students intend to transfer to a nearby regional university, and the two institutions willpartner to provide a comprehensive transfer navigation strategy [14] and optional researchopportunities [15]. Table 1. Summary of Relevant CCSE Survey Report Data. Difference from comparison groups (2017
the REU Site was conducted by the Social and Behavioral Sciences ResearchConsortium (SBSRC) at UNL. The evaluation plan included surveys conducted with thestudents before and after their time in the program and focus group sessions conducted with thestudents and interviews with their faculty mentors. The evaluation plan also includes follow-upsurveys with the participating undergraduate students one year after their completion of theprogram. Since this is the first year of this program, this data has not yet been collected. Thequantitative data collection (pretest, posttest) was conducted by the UNL Office of GraduateStudies and the results were sent to the SBSRC for analysis and reporting. The qualitative datacollection (i.e., interviews and
field and prior engineering identity studies. In particular, we seek tounderstand which factors may influence Hispanic students’ engineering identity development.We begin by answering the following research questions: 1. How do the engineering identity, extracurricular experiences, post-graduation career plans, and familial influence of Hispanic students attending a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI) differ from those of Hispanic students attending a Predominantly White Institution (PWI)? 2. How do the same measures differ for Hispanic students attending a PWI from those of non-Hispanic white students at that PWI? 3. How do the same measures differ for Hispanic students attending an HSI from those of non-Hispanic
mathematics learning community anchored by the UTA Student Chapter of the MAA (Mathematical Association of America), on which we have built strong support programs to ensure academic success and professional development for our SURGE scholars. • An institutional initiative to improve undergraduate retention and graduation rates, which overlaps well with the SURGE program in goals and plans. • A vibrant regional economy that provides ample opportunities to place our SURGE scholars in internships and permanent jobs. Many of our SURGE alumni work at major corporations in the region. They are great assets to our SURGE scholars for career mentoring and job placement.The MAA Student Chapter in the UTA
Paper ID #21334A Conceptual Model for Engineering Major ChoiceDr. Joyce B. Main, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Joyce B. Main is Assistant Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She holds a Ph.D. in Learning, Teaching, and Social Policy from Cornell University, and an Ed.M. in Administration, Planning, and Social Policy from the Harvard Graduate School of Education.Xinrui (Rose) Xu, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering) Xinrui (Rose) Xu is a doctoral student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She also serves as a career consultant
. Plan Monitor Plan Monitor Plan Monitor Transition Team Start Design Evaluate to Life Long Up and Project Process Flow And Refine Learning Research Sheet Design Re*lect Re*lect Re*lect Design Project
business studentsdid not participate in clinic observations. Based on clinic observations, the engineering studentspresent problem ideas to business students who vet the concepts from a business standpoint.Working in multidisciplinary teams, students identify and address a specific unmet clinical needand develop a commercially viable solution or product. The engineering students focus onproblem solving and design of the solution while the business students focus on developing abusiness and marketing plan. The students enrolled in the “Special Topics in EngineeringBiomedical Innovation” are expected to spend a minimum of 4 hours per week outside of classdeveloping a solution, designing, building and testing prototypes. An engineering
these skills, not related to professional ambitions, come into play. Interestingly, aminority of students (14.3%) do not agree that English-language skills are important in thesecontexts, which suggests that their decision to study at a North-American institution is likely forother academic reasons. It should be noted that of those that did not agree on the importance ofEnglish-language skills, half indicated they were planning to stay in Canada after graduation(data not explicitly shown), which suggests a perception that communication skills are notrelevant to engineers or necessary for future success, even in an English-speaking environment. 45 42 40 35
powerful, GD seemed almosttoo flexible and complicated to a number of students whose computer literacy was stilldeveloping. In following semesters, we plan to use BBL as main platform, supplemented byGD.Introduction“Introduction to Engineering Design” is a course taken mostly by first- and second-year studentsin the Mechanical and Mechatronic Engineering programs at California State University, Chico.This course represents the first engineering design experience for most students in the programs.Students are instructed to keep a notebook in most of lab- and project-oriented courses in ourcurriculum, including “Measurements and Instrumentation” and the senior Capstone designproject. Specific format of these notebooks may vary, depending on the
, members together provide leadership, create a economic, environmental, and societal context collaborative and inclusive environment, establishi) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives engage in life-long learning 6) an ability to develop and conduct appropriatej) a knowledge of contemporary issues experimentation, analyze and interpret data, and usek) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering judgment to draw conclusions engineering tools necessary for systems engineering 7) an ability to acquire and apply new knowledge as practice
on thedesign of bridges in Oregon.The class was co-taught by two faculty members, one from history and one from civilengineering. The design and execution of the course was a combined effort, with a unified set ofreadings and integrated instruction that exposed students to multiple viewpoints on the subject.The central goal was to provide civil engineering students with a broad perspective on the factorsthat influence engineering design, going beyond the purely technical to explore issues associatedwith aesthetics, place, politics, and economics.This paper describes the class structure and content, as well as issues raised by the uniquestructure of the field portion of the class and problems encountered during planning andexecution. A
collaboratively to improve andextend this type of entrepreneurial learning even further into the program. The impact on ABETand KEEN outcomes are addressed. Student feedback is also positive. The pervasiveness of theapplication of entrepreneurial mindset is present in student reflections, project technicaldocuments, design reviews, oral exams, and other student work. The entrepreneurial mindset hasbecome part of the culture of our program in a short time, which we view as a positive outcome.The experiences of the participating faculty members are presented in the paper, as well asstudent reflections on the application of entrepreneurial mindset in their courses and designprojects. Planned next steps are also addressed in the paper.IntroductionEngineers
process to using thosemethods is equally important to achieve the desired results in colleges thatcurrently use lectures as the primary mode of teaching. The planning processinvolved in such a transition and its effectiveness was investigated by using themechanical engineering department in a leading R1 university as case-study,where a departmental policy of promoting active learning methods inundergraduate classes was newly implemented. Professors and teaching assistantsinstructing mechanical engineering courses in this college were interviewed tounderstand the steps they went through to transition to using more active methodsof teaching. Data collected from instructors-of-record in 5 different sophomoreand junior level courses revealed their
featured pre-defined inquiry questions and design problems,pre-planned investigations, did not ask for model generation, and did not call for mathematizingbeyond very simple linear measurement. Though Practice 8 was demonstrated in Classroom B,there was little opportunity for it in Classroom A, so it was not included in the analysis.This review informed the decision to focus on practices 4, 6, and 7, which involve working withdata, explaining phenomena, designing solutions, and engaging in argument from evidence. Toanalyze the student data for these three practices, we broke them down into sub-practicesaccording to NGSS Appendix F [1] for grade band 3 to 5 (see Table 1).For each classroom, we coded for sub-practices first with the richer data
course or multiple courses.For each course that each student receives honors credit, they are required to explain how theproject will enhance the learning outcomes on a proposal.2.3 Tech FridaysTech Fridays are held three times per semester and are designed and facilitated by peer mentorsand faculty. In addition, industry partners and speakers are invited. Activities are scheduled to bethree hours long and consist of lesson plans and a guided lesson. The lesson plans are printed andprovided to help students with formation in case they get lost or stuck during the lesson. Mentorswalk the room and help the students individually to make sure everyone can persevere whilechallenges are issued to advanced students to keep them working. The Tech
of laboratory learning.Dr. Tony Ribera, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Tony Ribera serves as the Director of Assessment in the Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. He most recently worked at the Indiana University School of Medicine where he served as the Director of Program Evaluation in the Office of Medical Student Education. Tony has a PhD from Indiana University in Higher Education and Student Affairs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work-in-Progress: Developing a Multi-dimensional Method for Student Assessment in Chemical Engineering Laboratory CoursesIntroduction:The impetus for this
Ed.D. in Academic Leadership/Higher Education and an MS degree in Applied Technology/Instructional Design. She has over 10 years of experience teaching, designing instruction, and doing qualitative research both in and outside of a library context. Her research interests focus on library and technology-based instructional planning and course design, assessment and evaluation topics, as well as online teaching and learning.Alyson L. Froehlich, University of Utah c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Teach-Flipped: A Faculty Development MOOC on How to Teach FlippedAbstract: The objective of this NSF project was to help faculty learn to
, yet in this paper, we focused on specific tasks to allowus to create the foundation for implementing the overall study.Overall study: 1. To determine if a correlation exists between track choice and career choice, 2. To determine if a correlation exists between track choice and obtaining an internship/co- op, 3. To determine if a correlation exists between undergraduate research experience and entry-level BME/BIOE industry jobs, and 4. To determine industry perceptions of bioengineering student competencies.Objectives of this works-in-progress study: 1. Review the literature on BME/BIOE curriculums 2. Review departmental data as a pilot of the planned study 3. Develop instruments to acquire data needed for our study
forward until obstacle is detected Lab #5: Avoid obstacle using lidar (introduce path planning) Lab #6: Turtlebot mapping and localization (team projects exploring obstacle avoidance using vector field histograms and other advanced algorithms)An example of MATLAB code to move the Turtlebot forward for 10 seconds is shown in figure2. This is considerable less code and less steep learning curve than would be necessary inPython or C++ in a Linux environment. ipaddress = '192.168.1.1‘ % IP of Turtlebot (will depend on your setup) rosinit(ipaddress) % start ROS robot = rospublisher('/mobile_base/commands/velocity'); % publish velocity topic velmsg = rosmessage(robot); % get message format for velocity tic
oralcommunication, leadership, planning, and teamwork in preparation for a more successfulindustry sponsored senior capstone course. In the course, students enter knowing little of whatengineering writing looks like, where to go for engineering background research, how to scopeprojects, create project timelines, etc.The curricular structure of the course does not allow for long term projects as students completetwo projects during the course of the semester. The first projects are developed frominternational humanitarian partners that the works with during the summer. Each project teamconsists of four to six students, an on campus faculty or staff member from a differentdepartment who is familiar with the international non-governmental organization and
, personalconceptualizations and prior learning experiences related to the problem [11]–[13]. Taskinterpretation is broadly defined as students’ judgment about the required cognitive processes toanswer a problem [14]. Studies reported that people who can self-regulate appropriately (i.e.,engage in coherent planning, enacting, and monitoring activities) based on a correct andcomplete interpretation tend to be more successful in academia [15], [16], problem-solving [17]–[19], and engineering design [4], [20], [21].Task Interpretation in Self-Regulated Learning Task interpretation refers to one’s understanding of a problem, including knowledge ofthe required cognitive process to solve it [14]. Students’ interpretation of tasks is considered asan important work
planning and development of a capital investment strategy in the next three-year period for Apple, Inc. to follow its new strategy in building new manufacturing capability in the United States to enhance its design, production, future new product deployment, and market dominance in the US market and support the promotion of Made-in-USA national manufacturing strategy. The expected investment budget is 800 million dollars to 1 billion dollars of the present-day value. This project needs to consider the issues of moving manufacturing activities from Asia to the US, including all the supply chain & supplier issues. The project needs to provide what the strategy should be, how much to
fieldsparticipated in a pilot internship program with a variety of athletics programs on campus.Following an encouraging pilot phase (based on informal interviews/testimonials), we now workto establish a formal research and assessment plan for the internship program Via surveys andinterviews with student participants as well as participants' supervisors (i.e., athleticcoaches/assistants), we seek to investigate the components of the internship and explore how theexperience impacts students career interests and self-efficacy related to pursuing a career in dataanalysis in particular as it relates to sports programs. We introduce the partners, provide anoverview of the anticipated research and assessment plan, and discuss preliminary lessons fromthe program
processes for product production applications such as forming, molding, separating, conditioning, joining, and finishing.5. Utilize 2-D and 3-D computer-aided design systems to create drawings and models for products, machines, jigs, fixtures, and other mechanical devices used in manufacturing environments.6. Read and interpret manufacturing documentation such as blue prints, technical drawings and diagrams, production plans, tooling plans, quality plans, and safety plans.TEC333 also has specific course objectives. Upon successful completion of the course, studentswill be able to:1. Identify geometric characteristic symbols and the other symbols associated with geometric dimensioning and tolerancing.2. Identify features with size and
encourages both horizontal and vertical curriculum alignment. By the end ofthe summer program, participants are expected to produce a final deliverable for theirclassrooms, which may take the form of a lesson or unit-plan, which infuses knowledge gainedfrom their research experience into their classroom practice.WE2NG summer trainings have three distinct “phases” – starting with an orientation week(typically a half-week), followed by four-to-five full weeks focusing on research and curriculumand development, and concluding with a week that consists of a “Showcase of Lessons” (apresentation of the final deliverable) and extended field trip. The orientation week consists of acampus tour, explanation of program expectations, final deliverable
Paper ID #23902How Structures Move: Three Projects in Deployable StructuresDr. Sudarshan Krishnan, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Sudarshan Krishnan specializes in the area of lightweight structures. His current research focuses on the structural design and behavior of cable-strut systems and transformable structures. His accompanying in- terests include the study of elastic and geometric structural stability. He teaches courses on the planning, analysis and design of structural systems. He has also developed a new course on deployable structures and transformable architecture. As an architect and structural
. Agile software development emerged as the most prominent approach to softwaredevelopment around the turn of the millenium. Still widely-adopted, Agile contrasts withprevious approaches that had rigid planning by emphasizing adapting quickly to evolvingcustomer needs. Agile enables responding to change by operating on short intervals of deliveringsoftware to the customer, eliciting feedback, and adjusting accordingly. The Agile principles [5]include: “Business people and developers must work together daily throughout the project, [...]the most efficient and effective method of conveying information to and within a developmentteam is face-to-face conversation, [...and] our highest priority is to satisfy the customer throughearly and continuous
Francis delivered an encyclical on the environment and humanecology. “Laudato de si” [10] which calls upon all peoples of the world, especially those of theChristian faith, to recognize the Earth as sacred and to direct daily actions accordingly. Byfocusing attention on what can be done at the individual and local levels, individuals andcommunities become accountable for preserving resources and living in a more sustainablemanner. Joining in this call are a number of other faith leaders.Germany has been addressing sustainable policy and practices in business, industry and withintheir municipalities for decades. The results are impressive when considering sustainable urbanstructures and planning, renewable energy usage, national recycling