Paper ID #25200Monitoring and Controlling a Construction Project in the ClassroomCol. Brad Wambeke P.E., United States Military Academy Colonel Brad Wambeke is the Civil Engineering Division Director at the U.S. Military Academy, West Point, NY. He received his B.S. from South Dakota State University; M.S. from the University of Min- nesota; and Ph.D. from North Carolina State University. He is a member of ASEE and is a registered Professional Engineer in Missouri. His primary research interests include construction engineering, lean construction, and engineering education.Major Todd Mainwaring, United States Military
Paper ID #25531Longitudinal Integration of the Same Design Project in Multiple StructuralEngineering CoursesDr. Matthew Swenty P.E., Virginia Military Institute Matthew (Matt) Swenty obtained his Bachelors and Masters degrees in Civil Engineering from Missouri S&T and then worked as a bridge designer at the Missouri Department of Transportation. He returned to school to obtain his Ph.D. in Civil Engineering at Virginia Tech followed by research work at the Turner- Fairbank Highway Research Center on concrete bridges. He is currently an associate professor of Civil Engineering at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI). He
Paper ID #27076Improving Student Writing Outcomes Through Dynamic Feedback, DesignOriented Projects and Curriculum ModificationMr. Matthew Willi Brand, University of California, Irvine Matthew Brand is a PhD student focusing on sediment transport and modeling coupled human-natural systems in the Civil and Environmental Engineering Department at the University of California, Irvine. Matthew’s work focuses on modeling the interactions between sediment transport and the natural and built environments in coastal estuaries. More specifically, this work investigates how hydromorphodynamic processes, regulations and habitat
Paper ID #25095Learning by Doing: Collaborative Active Learning Hands-On Project-BasedHomework for a Large Gateway Engineering ClassDr. Ricardo Zaurin P.E., University of Central Florida Dr. Zaurin obtained his Bachelor Degree in Civil Engineering from ’Universidad de Oriente’ in Venezuela in 1985. In 1990 he earned a MSc in Information Technology. He has been civil engineering professor with teaching experience at his Alma Mater (Universidad de Oriente) from 1986 until 2002. Dr. Zaurin moves to USA and completes another MSc, this time Structural and Geotechnical Engineering. Upon completing multidisciplinary PhD on
Paper ID #27223Call It What You Want: Blending Project-based Learning and the FlippedClassroom Model in a Civil Engineering CourseDr. Angel Ari Perez-Mejia, Quinnipiac University Ari Perez-Mejia earned his undergraduate degree in civil engineering at the Universidad Tecnologica Centroamericana (UNITEC) in Honduras, and did his graduate work at the University of South Carolina. He received his PhD in 2014 and joined the engineering faculty at Quinnipiac University that same year. His interests are in the conservation of archaeological sites and in engineering education. c American Society for
. Toaddress this, we developed a framework that helps students (1) understand the relevance ofcontent in lower-level civil engineering courses to real-life applications, (2) make connectionsthrough course content across civil engineering sub-disciplines, as well as non-engineeringcourses, and (3) understand impacts and create value in the broader, holistic perspective of theirprojects.Additionally, we created a common project platform upon which to build and further developproject objectives in selected required technical design courses. This will facilitate the synthesisof all sub-discipline components to fit together as part of the overall system. The framework wasintroduced in the freshman introduction to design course with the intent for it to be
within the Envision Rating System, present case studies, and to coachthem in how to apply it to their projects. This has led to multiple benefits. Because the materialis presented by an outside consulting firm, rather than faculty, it is possible that the studentsattach more credibility to it. The effort is also timed better, coming in the middle of the projectdevelopment stage, rather than toward the end.In response to call for papers: Applications of Sustainability Rating Systems in Civil EngineeringCurriculumIntroduction and BackgroundSustainability has been becoming increasingly important in civil engineering. Robinson andSutterer stated in 2003, “Sustainability must become a fundamental consideration in all civilengineering design and
Paper ID #25354Board 15: Introducing Students to Engineering by Helping Them RePictureTheir WorldLynn Mayo P.E., RePicture Engineering, PBC Lynn Mayo holds a M.S. in civil engineering from Stanford University and a B.S in civil engineering from Bucknell University. After working for over 30 years as a civil engineer, she became CEO of RePicture Engineering, PBC. RePIcture Engineering is dedicated to increasing interest and diversity in engineering by telling the stories of engineering projects, engineers, and organizations. Through the RePIcture.com site, we are helping students discover careers shaping the future and
and BA in Spanish language & literature from North Carolina State University, and a MS/PhD in civil engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Exposing Undergraduates to Design, Fabrication, and Large-Scale Experimentation in a Structural Steel Design CourseAbstractDuring Fall 2017, Spring and Fall 2018 quarters, various hands-on design, fabrication, and large-scale experimental projects were incorporated into a 10-week undergraduate structural steeldesign course offered in the Department of Architectural Engineering at California PolytechnicState University – San Luis Obispo. Through these projects students
emerging needfor students to understand the role of sustainability in infrastructure design. Intertwining thesetwo areas with a service learning case study on sustainable infrastructure design provideslearners with access to modeling of practitioner’s ability to apply new knowledge in real time.This study reports on a pilot semester-long project, in which students develop learning skills,with a focus on sustainability by working with a non-profit developer to document Envisioncredits for a transit-based development. In this case study, weaving learning theory, sustainableinfrastructure design and service learning together provides students with 1. access to tools foridentifying new knowledge needed, 2. an understanding of the complexities of
Paper ID #26363A Real-World Approach to Introducing Sustainability in Civil EngineeringCapstone DesignDr. Leslie R. Brunell P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science) Leslie Brunell, PhD, PE is a Teaching Professor at Stevens Institute of Technology. She coordinates both the civil and multidisciplinary engineering senior design projects. These projects are the culmination of the undergraduate engineering experience. Students design an innovative solution to a complex problem. She has recruited professional sponsors who mentor the civil engineering design projects. The projects expose the civil
integrate a set of “risk and resilience” focused coursesinto engineering education for workforce towards a hazard-resilient built environment. A set ofthree individual courses, namely, 1) Introduction to Risk and Resiliency in Engineering, 2)Reliability and Optimization Methods in Engineering, 3) Sensing and Data Analytics forInfrastructure Systems will be developed and incorporated into curriculum. These three courseshave been designed to be help address the fundamental knowledge and techniques needed forengineers to conduct the assessment, design and management of engineering systems to achievehazard resilience. The paper provides details about the rational and course objectives, coursecomponents, and sample course projects for design and
Paper ID #27685Student Perceptions of High-Impact Learning Activities and Teaching Strate-giesDr. Veera Gnaneswar Gude P.E., Mississippi State University Veera Gnaneswar Gude is a faculty member of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department in the Bagley College of Engineering at Mississippi State University. He has degrees in Chemical (B.S.) and En- vironmental Engineering (M.S., Ph.D.) disciplines with over 18 years of academic, industry, and research experiences on various Chemical and Environmental Engineering projects. He is a licensed professional engineer and a board certified environmental engineer (BCEE). He
Paper ID #26692Work in Progress: Integrating Civil Engineering Design Software into theCurriculum to Enhance Career Readiness SkillsProf. Todd M. Brown P.E., University of Hartford Todd Brown, P.E. received his MSCE from the University of New Hampshire in 1984. He worked as an environmental engineer in the Army for 4 years and then 28 years at Tighe & Bond working on contaminated sites, industrial and municipal wastewater treatment, collection systems, water transmission mains and urban redevelopment projects. In 2016, he became an Applied Assistant Professor in the Civil, Environmental, and Biomedical Engineering
post-doctoral fellowship at Lawrence National Laboratory focusing on developing a modern computational framework for the nonlinear seismic analysis of Department of Energy nuclear facilities and systems. This work seeks to expand the under- standing of soil structure interaction for these structures and the means of modeling this behavior both theoretically and experimentally. In addition to her research experience, Dr. Wong also has worked for the public and private engineering sectors in the areas of water infrastructure, transportation, data systems, and project management. She joined San Francisco State University in 2014 as lecturer and is currently an assistant professor of Civil Engineering in the School of
design and demonstrating how the AmericanInstitute of Steel Construction Manual (AISC) codifies these concepts and theories for thepurpose of design (i.e., low-level Bloom’s taxonomy objectives such as remembering andunderstanding [2]). Time within the classroom typically focused on the practical application ofthese concepts and theories through examples as well as project-based learning (i.e., mid andhigh-level Bloom’s taxonomy objectives such as applying, analyzing, and evaluating [2]). Theexpectation was students would spend a similar amount of time studying for the course whencompared to the prior year (when the course format followed a “traditional” model withclassroom time dedicated to theoretical knowledge and less time allocated towards
department had been struggling with writingexecutive summaries for their final senior design course projects to be reviewed by an advisoryboard panel. Over the years the advisory board had been complaining about the quality andwhat was being communicated in the summaries. This led to a collaboration with a writingconsultant at the university to provide instruction on the executive summary. This paperaddresses the framework used for the intervention employed to help these students write betterexecutive summaries. It also explores the improvement of the summaries based on theintervention adapted for the course coming from a background of genre theory and employingtools from genre analysis. The study examines the writing of executive summaries from
include keeping the fundamental topics (e.g.,soil classification, seepage, mechanical behavior) but limiting the theoretical derivations to allowtime to cover additional topics and incorporate active learning into the classroom. The overallgoal of the small group activities created as part of this project are to expose students to realworld concepts in geotechnical engineering and enhance student learning.The authors have both taught geology for engineers courses at their respective universities andutilized the extensive resources available for geoscience educators through the ScienceEducation Research Center (SERC website https://serc.carleton.edu/highered/index.html). Inaddition, the authors have used materials from the National Center for Case
2 Explain… 3 0 0 0 & Data Analysis 3 Conduct… 3 0 0 0 Critical Thinking 1 Identify/Define… 2 0 1 0 & 2 Explain… 2 0 1 0 Problem Solving 3 Formulate… 2 0 1 0 1 Identify… 3 0 0 0 Project Management 2 Explain… 3 0 0 0Table 1. (Continued) Already Easily With Some
, engineering economics, innovation, andsafety. Additionally, the constituency input also supported significant changes were needed tothe CEBOK [13]. While other references and input also supported the need for a new edition,these were the key inputs that led to the comprehensive revision of the CEBOK.Who Should Be Interested in the CEBOK3?As stated in the preface to the CEBOK3 [3]: “All civil engineers, including students studyingcivil engineering, those who teach civil engineering, early-career civil engineers, those whomentor early-career civil engineers, those who employ civil engineers, those who design civilengineering projects, those who lead and manage groups of civil engineers and civil engineeringprojects, and those who conduct research in
- tivity messaging. Currently, Dr. Bornstein is leading a series of research studies investigating the impacts of physical inactivity and low physical fitness on military readiness and national security. Dr. Bornstein’s research has been featured in over 130 media outlets worldwide, including USA Today, Newsweek, Stars and Stripes, and National Public Radio. Based on his research, Dr. Bornstein has provided numerous briefings to senior military personnel and lawmakers, including briefings at The Pentagon and Capitol Hill. In addition to his research, Dr. Bornstein has held national leadership positions in the physical ac- tivity and public health field including: Project Coordinator for the U.S. National Physical Activity
as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects through- out the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering education, non- verbal communication in the classroom, and learning through historical engineering accomplishments. He has authored and co-authored a significant number of journal articles and book chapters on these topics.Dr. Kenneth J. Fridley, University of Alabama Kenneth J. Fridley is the Senior Associate Dean for the College of Engineering at The University of Alabama. Prior to his current appointment, Fridley served as Professor and Head of the
education context.Following research questions guided this study: 1) How do student-facilitated asynchronous online discussions effect peer interaction in a graduate level engineering course? 2) How do student-facilitated asynchronous online discussions effect critical thinking in a graduate level engineering course?MethodologyResearch context Preconstruction Project Engineering and Management is a required course for theConstruction Engineering and Management specialization in a civil engineering department at alarge Midwestern university of USA. The goal of the course is to provide students with anunderstanding of construction complexity and change in project management skills. Main coursetasks included
works… for sustainable[3] Design a system… to meet desired needs within such performance realistic constraints as… sustainability.EnvE BOK Explain the need for and ethics of integrating sustainability Design a complex system, process,AAEE 2009 throughout all engineering disciplines and the role [of] or project to perform sustainably[5] environmental engineers…. Evaluate the sustainability of Quantify environmental releases or resources consumed complex systems…. for a given engineered processABET Criterion 3, c: design a system… within realistic2015 constraints such as … sustainability.[4] CE: Include principles
on conservation of energy, momentum, and manyother relevant concepts. This course transformation focused on engaging students both inside andoutside of the classroom by incorporating elements of a flipped class and allotting dedicated in-class time for daily group activities. Additionally, a hands-on group project in which studentsdesigned, built, and tested a popsicle stick bridge was implemented in this course offering. Thecourse transformation also included implementation and analysis of exam wrappers. PDTF B collaborated with instructors on ME 320, a junior-level Dynamics course andEECS 140, a freshman-level Digital Logic Design course. For the Dynamics course, the PDTFworked with an experienced professor who had been
advocate for methods that canincrease the creativity and innovation allowed in civil engineering projects. Performance BasedDesign (PBD) is an example where the creativity of solutions can flourish by removingconventional code-based prescriptions. PDB requires fundamental knowledge but allows thefreedom to connect and apply that knowledge in new forms. The creative idea becomes aninnovation when it is built or implemented and proven through operation. However, an innovationdoes not become disruptive and alter society without diffusion of that knowledge [7]. Other civilengineers need to hear about, form an opinion of, and either implement or reject the innovation inother projects. The creative/ innovative cycle from formulation to diffusion needs
: N/A semester credit hours (or equivalent) of engineering topics appropriate to the program, consisting of engineering and computer sciences and engineering design, and utilizing modern engineering tools.Project Management. Both the CEBOK3 and the CEPC outcome statements (Table 9) requirethe explanation of basic concepts of project management. As such no gap exists and theCEBOK3 outcome is fully addressed. Compliance with the ABET criteria assures attainment ofthe CEBOK3 outcome. No changes to the ABET criteria are
7 Experiment Methods & Data Analysis 4 Humanities 8 Critical Thinking & Problem Solving Technical Professional 9 Project Management 16 Communication 10 Engineering Economics 17 Teamwork & Leadership 11 Risk & Uncertainty 18 Lifelong Learning 12 Breadth in Civil Engineering Areas 19 Professional Attitudes 13 Design 20 Professional Responsibilities 14 Technical Depth 21 Ethical Responsibilities 15 SustainabilityInitially the committee attempted to classify all 21
. Military Academy Dr. Brock E. Barry, P.E. is Professor of Engineering Education in the Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering at the United States Military Academy, West Point, New York. Dr. Barry holds a Bachelor of Science degree from Rochester Institute of Technology, a Master of Science degree from University of Colorado at Boulder, and a PhD from Purdue University. Prior to pursuing a career in academics, Dr. Barry spent 10-years as a senior geotechnical engineer and project manager on projects through- out the United States. He is a licensed professional engineer in multiple states. Dr. Barry’s areas of research include assessment of professional ethics, teaching and learning in engineering
Total Cost = Based on prices in this table Demo $71.25 Total estimated build time: 60 minutes Figure 4. Critical Pick Building DimensionsClassroom ImplementationDisplay the 2x6 beam at the front of the class, but do not have anything connected to it. Let thestudents build their answer as they work to solve the problem. Bruhl et al3 and Bruhl, Hanus, andKlosky4 discuss the importance of developing engineering judgement and using self-discovery inthe classroom. This demo can function as an IBLA to help develop engineering judgement ifpresented beyond the traditional instructor guided demo method. The scenario is as follows; thestudents are new project engineers on a job site. The project