teammates who felt excluded in the conversations might not be as motivated towork on those parts of projects. In the role-playing exercise, students were asked to pick rolesand use one of the motivations that were identified by the students.The initial plan was to find intervention methods that instructors could use when they notice thatsome students were being excluded. The students, though, felt that intervention methodstargeted, at specific students would be counterproductive and requested that the inclusivity bepart of the team expectations and training, rather than a targeted intervention.In Fall 2018, the authors administered a pilot survey designed to validate the results of Zhu andMeuth’s [21] survey of communication, teamwork, and
situation. These two incidents highlightedthe complexity of running computerized exams and the unpredictable human errors that comeswith them.Early in the spring of 2016, IT gave their final notice to discontinue service for computerizedexams starting in the fall of 2016. Although this creates an inconvenience, it also presents anopportunity for the course staff to gain full control of the exam infrastructure.Phase II: Self-Supported Computerized ExamThere are two components in self-supported computerized exam that require planning: hardwareand software. Since we no longer can block off a large number of computer labs, we have toresort to the Bring Your Own Device (BYOD) model. Students will need to bring their owncomputers to use in the exams
and forester curiosity, (9) Discovery-based learning, (10) Interleaved course design. In each workshop, the participants had the opportunity to work individually or with apartner to design their curriculum unit. Throughout the face-to-face interactions and online, theteachers shared their educational challenges, resources, their plan to integrate the RET programwith their subject area, as well as the implementation plan of the developed curriculum unit. Theparticipants also had access to meet with workshop leaders to discuss their curriculum unit andreceive feedback. Figure 6. Automation workstation for inspecting 3D printed parts4. Program EvaluationThe program is evaluated in two phases. The first phase is to collect
research, broaden my knowledge base, engage in evidence-based practices to promote the quality of life, and ultimately be an avid contributor to the world of academia through research, peer reviews, and publications.Mr. Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Harding University I am an undergraduate mechanical engineering major anticipating graduation in May of 2019. I am a member of the Beyond Professional Identity research group based in Harding University located in Searcy, Arkansas. I plan to further my studies in engineering education in graduate school particularly in regards to equipping students to work in development and sustainability.Dr. Nicola W. Sochacka, University of Georgia Dr. Nicola Sochacka is the Associate Director
are as follows:I. Collaboratively identify relevant concepts and contexts with students, faculty and practicingengineers. Here we define practicing engineers as having 1) the expertise of the respondingtransportation professionals emphasized combinations of signal timing, urban planning, andtransportation design or expertise on pressurized pipe flow 2.) participants had a range ofexperience from 2 to 17 years, and the sample was approximately 40 percent women. Thisproject is focused on two specific areas of engineering (traffic signal timing and pressurized pipeflow). Specifically, we will use 6 semi-structured interviews with transportation engineers and 6semi-structured interviews with hydraulics engineers to help develop authentically
Engineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.The training is to be applicable to all types of GTA contexts: lab, discussion, and lecture. Becausemany of our engineering students’ career goals are within non-academic settings, students oftenhave little natural motivation to develop effective pedagogical skills. As explained in our previouspaper 1 , the team made a strategic decision to combine the teaching of leadership skills and peda-gogical skills in order to appeal to GTAs who plan to go into non-academic careers. In this paper,we will present our logic model for the iELITE program, which has four categories of inputs:GTAs, Engineering Faculty, Administration (College and Departments), and External Partners (in-dustry sponsors
University ofPuerto Rico, Mayagüez (URPM) to promote community-based “Do-It-Yourself” solutions.Especially after Hurricane María, many isolated communities were left with no choice other thanto respond and adapt relatively independently from government or other aid agencies. Theconcept of Community Resilience is therefore the focus of this study. This concept includes notonly temporary measures of ‘survival’, but also the broader notion of sustainable communitiesand planning [5]. Our approach to community resilience is participatory, with the understandingthat many solutions lie within the innovative capacities of “victims”. We draw upon CreativeCapacity Building (CCB) as an approach to train community members to develop skills to designtheir own
ARMprocessors starting Fall of 2016. ARM processors have been widely adopted by industry andhave been used in a wide range of applications based on the current market. In this paper, thetransitional effort in the course development and outcome was described. It generatedmicrocontroller architecture and embedded system software courses providing a balancedapproach between theory and hands-on learning skills through relevant laboratory assignmentsand term projects. The author plans to continue the effort in delivering practical and hands-onlectures and laboratories. In the Engineering Technology Department at Texas A&M University,a resident master’s program will start from this Fall of 2019. The author plans to teach a newgraduate course focused on
. Performed various consulting tasks from USA for several oil companies (Jawaby Oil Service Co., WAHA Oil and Oasis Co., London, England). The responsibilities included production planning, forecasting and reservoir maintenance. This production planning and forecasting consisted of history matching and c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25469prediction based on selected drilling. The reservoir maintenance included: water/gas injection and gas liftfor selected wells to optimize reservoir production plateau and prolonging well’s economic life.Terra Tek, Inc., Salt Lake City, UT, 1985-1987; Director
: Wireless Charger Implementation - In today’s world, and especially in the UnitedStates, municipal rapid transit systems are rare because nearly all require substantial governmentsubsidies to maintain financial viability. In response, this project proposes a new personal rapidtransit architecture with a unique economic design. The solution is to build an ultra-lightweightand low-cost transit system with autonomous vehicles that carry one or two passengers at a time.The initial concept demonstration is planned to be used for the REU site.A 2017 REU participant has made a tremendous impact on the program and this project. Herecently graduated at NC State University with an electrical engineering degree. Theopportunities granted to him by the UGRS
, defined dichotomy, defining rough ideas, and transition from rough idea to sketch–had strong positive influence on the specific design engineering attributes of – imagination,innovation, and design solution definition. These relationships demonstrate that the designsolutions can be innovative following C-K theory. These correlations also provide evidence tofurther the belief that biomimicry is a significant approach to enhancing engineering curricula.Our instructional resources have resulted in design concepts that more closely resembledbiological inspiration, learning from nature to innovate rather than copying, as opposed tobiological imitation that closely resembles the observable features of biological systems.Research ApproachOur plan to
gain morefamiliarity with engineering and the engineering design process [e.g. 8, 9], there is a need tobetter specify what exactly is important for teachers to learn. For instance, while teachers shouldbe familiar with the steps of an EDP, research suggests that this is not sufficient to productivelyfacilitate students’ engineering. In a prior project [10], we documented how teachers’ attention tosteps of an EDP can be a barrier for their meaningful engagement with their students’engineering. When a teacher focused solely on students progressing through each step of theEDP, she missed productive aspects of students’ thinking that deviated from the linear processshe had planned [11]. These findings motivated us to consider how to support
a public middle school ina Midwestern city. The students in this class are enrolled in 7th and 8th grade. It requires anunderstanding of the students’ preference and responses on various learning topics to bridge thegap between the college and K-12 classroom. A graduate student with an interdisciplinarytraineeship on global sustainability served as the primary instructor for the course, with the supportof the host teacher. The schedule for the visiting instructor is: (1) in week 1-2, the instructorobserves the class and accepts training on K-12 education; (2) during week 3-6, the instructorassists the host teacher during the course and develop a lesson plan; (3) in week 7-9, the instructorteaches the designed module and collects reflections
teams that exist inworkplaces within the United States and abroad. As such, the purpose of this paper is to describethe process of creating and subsequent plans for implementation of an interdisciplinary capstonecourse at a large research-intensive institution in the Southeast US. The challenges associatedwith developing a course that meets the need of each disciplinary capstone experience and spansthe boundary of different approaches to pedagogy, knowledge structure and learning will beexplored as well.Background and ObjectivesOne of the most common complaints among recruiters of engineering graduates is a failure ofuniversities to properly prepare their students to collaborate within a diverse workplaceenvironment [1], [2]. Students typically
sought to identify what features if any were consistent throughout all thedocuments. The features identified in the summaries from the semesters of the interventionwere used to review the summaries from the previous year(s). Once the structural features ofthe summaries were identified, one of the second authors read the summaries looking for thesame structural elements to confirm the structural patterns. Then the board comments/scores were also collected for the semesters used to identifyany patterns of improvement. This strategy did not work out as planned due to a few anomaliesinvolved in the semesters included in the study. There was no clear evidence of improvementbetween the semesters studied. As a result, word counts of the
Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #25044 Planning in the Community & Regional Planning program. He has served as a graduate research assis- tant on an NSF-funded project, Revolutionizing Engineering Departments, and has been recognized as a Graduate Studies student spotlight recipient and teaching scholar. Jordan studies learning in authentic, real-world conditions utilizing Design-Based Research methodologies to investigate design learning and social engineering, in which he studies urban planners who design real-world interventions for commu- nities and students who use design to learn. A member of the Grand Portage Band of
peer mentors are rising sophomores, juniors, andseniors, most of whom have previously participated in a similar summer bridge program and whoshare common academic interests and life experiences with PTG participants.Peer mentoring activities include the completion of weekly one-on-one and small group meetingsof mentors and their assigned participants. Mentors follow weekly discussion guidelines toencourage participants’ learning and reflection; topics include syllabus review, study planning,goal setting, time management, and networking on campus, among other topics.In addition to formal peer mentoring activities, the bridge program environment provides frequentopportunities for participants to create informal connections with one another and
talks, and completing a mentor profile assignment. While the SciComm program expanded graduate students’ understanding of variousSTEM careers, only three graduate students (21.4%) indicated their career intentions shifted as aresult of the SciComm program. Most graduate students still maintained their intended careerintentions (n=8, 57.1%). Two graduate students’ (14.3%) career plans changed over the 2017-2018 academic year, but indicated the SciComm program did not impact this change.SciComm Program Perceptions Based on inductive coding of the qualitative data, it appeared that participants had bothpositive perceptions of the program and suggestions for improvement. Further, participants citedadditional benefits from the program
.[16] M. Krishnamurthy, D.A. Pezza, K.J. Fridley, D.B. Hains, “The Practitioners’ Point of View of the ASCE Body of Knowledge.” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. Salt Lake City UT, June 23-26, 2018. https://peer.asee.org/31120.[17] S.J. Ressler and D.R. Lynch. “The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge and Accreditation Criteria: A Plan for Long-term Management of Change.” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. Vancouver BC, June 26-29, 2011. https://peer.asee.org/18392.[18] ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. 2019. ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD: 2019
FAA,and major aerospace companies (eg, Lockheed-Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing and itssubsidiaries). Likewise, this history and UAF’s support of student-led design programs has alsodrawn interest from the aerospace industry for future collaboration. Companies see these activitiesas being particularly relevant on resumes.Future Efforts.With the great success in the courses and design team activities to date, UAF is next planning onextending these opportunities to other venues.UAS Operations. UAF intends to extend its existing UAS investigation and UAS design coursesto include a course where these assets are utilized to accomplish a realistic arctic research or publicservice mission. Students will examine the operational and data requirements
purpose, follow certain rules, andinteract with each other and with their surrounding environment.” A more general “handbook”defining the discipline and practice of “systems engineering”, available from the InternationalCouncil on Systems Engineering8, has been used to train engineers in a variety of topics,including: 1) technical processes (i.e., business mission, stakeholder needs, system requirements,design definition operation, maintenance, and disposal); 2) technical management processes (i.e.,project planning, risk management, and quality assurance); 3) agreement processes (i.e.,acquisition and supply); and 4) organizational project-enabling processes (i.e., life cyclemanagement, human resource management, and knowledge management). These
several professional organizations including the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and American Society of Chemical Engineering Education (ASEE) where she adopts and contributes to innovative pedagogical methods aimed at improving student learning and retention.Martin A. Watkins, University of New Mexico Martin A. Watkins is a PhD student in Educational Linguistics at the University of New Mexico. He earned his BA degrees in Deaf Studies (ASL/English Interpretation) and Linguistics from California State University, Northridge, and his MA degree in Linguistics from Gallaudet University. His research em- ploys critical ethnography and discourse analysis to investigate language ideologies and language plan
incorporateelements of this learning into our own courses so they hear about the value of this from civil andenvironmental engineers. We have several plans for improving our learning in these areas andare confident our efforts will be fruitful. We think the valuing of the humanities and socialsciences is broader than just a civil engineering or even an engineering focus. We are educatingfuture leaders and feel their effectiveness in society extends beyond framing things within anengineering or civil engineering context. In fact, we are concerned this may be to their detrimentand are still discussing our priorities in these areas.Alabama. We struggle with addressing the relationship of humanities to the practice ofengineering. We do this fairly effectively in
and areas for improvement. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop SeminarsI Learning to Teach: Justifies importance of formally learning to teach and introduces a model instructional strategy that will be a road map for the ETW.II Principles of Effective Teaching and Learning: Introduces Lowman’s3 two-dimensional model of teaching and provides a compendium of learning principles.III Introduction to Learning Styles: Examines Felder’s Learning Style Dimensions4 and discusses how to accommodate all styles of learners.IV Learning Objectives: Introduces Bloom’s taxonomy5 of educational objectives and shows how to write appropriate and useful learning objectives.V Planning a Class
part of the resilience process. The responsestate also requires well-orchestrated logistic management. Once the event is over, a strategic andwell documented damage assessment is required. This damage assessment will help identify sourcesof new or different nature of vulnerabilities. The magnitude of the damages will help identify if thelevel of damages requires a disaster declaration by the government. Alternative recovery effortsshould be planned ahead of time and be implemented as soon as possible to minimize amplificationof damages. Recovery alternatives must focus on the objectives of reducing the level of risk andimproving the level of target vulnerability with higher resilience. The state of engineering practice,codes and regulations
Chair or Chairperson To man (verb) to staff, to run, to operate Man-hours Work hours, hours worked, staff hours, person hours, hours Mankind Humanity, human race, human beings, people Manmade Artificial, synthetic, manufactured, crafted, machine made Manpower Work force, labor force, personnel, workers Guys Everyone, people, folks● Plan ahead. Include statements about inclusion and diverse learning needs in your syllabus.● Embrace diversity in content and practices ○ Assume students are diverse in ways you can’t see. Race, national origin, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, physical and
the courses includes: test plan creation, test case generation, program inspections,black-box testing, white-box testing, GUI testing, and the use of testing tools. The prerequisite forCEN4072 is the data structures course. The grading policy for the course is based on 2 midtermexams (25 % each), a group project (25%), attendance and class participation (5%) and a finalexam (20%). The course is structured as a lecture section with no lab component, and students areexpected to work on the project outside of class on their own time, with some in class question ses-sions. The textbook currently used in the course is “Foundations of Software Testing”’ by Mathur[21]. Other reading material includes class notes and tutorials on testing tools.The
needs to“plan and carry out fair tests,” which involves identifying failure points and difficulties, thenidentifying and gathering relevant data [9]. Designers are intentional and can explain the designrationale with each suggested iteration. Experienced designers run quick, valid tests, conductfocused diagnostic troubleshooting, and actively look for potential faults. These help them moveefficiently through progressively better ideas and prototypes. This stands in contrast to naivedesigners who tend to run random and confounded experiments, brush aside unanticipatedresults, and often remain intent on original ideas [8], [10]. Though novice engineers may beengaging in iteration, they may not be able to explain their choices and their practices
inductive loads is also used to highlight theissues of having an unbalanced power system. The student experience is based uponmeasurement and data acquisition to develop visual frameworks coupled with traditionalwhiteboard discussions.This paper contains a description of the course, its learning outcomes, lecture plans, assignments,laboratory experiments, and exam content. Student assessments, evaluations, and opinions arealso included to show the benefits of how the class improved student understanding of powerquality. A rubric was designed and employed which provides prognostics and analytics about theperceived value of the course. Lastly, a conclusion of the course from the instructor’s point ofview, including lessons learned and future
, scaling-up from a pilot processto a full-sized product plant is not a linear scaling as many processes, transformations, flow,chemical reactions and heat transfer are not together linearly scalable. That is: scale-up is(usually) possible but requires careful planning and “watching the dials and turning the knobs”on the first series of runs. Our first class sequence is a bench design, our second class sequenceis a small pilot and third year will be a full pilot plant with subsequent years scaling to fullproduction. Even then, we will have start-up issues and fine tuning to deal with as we continueto iteratively improve – watching the dials and turning the knobs as necessary.By using the “pilot approach,” and managing the specific changes made to