. He has additional appoint- ments in the Jonathan M. Tisch College of Civic Life and the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach at Tufts. His current engineering education research interests focus on community engagement, service-based projects and examining whether an entrepreneurial mindset can be used to further engi- neering education innovations. He also does research on the development of reuse strategies for waste materials.Dr. Nathan E. Canney, CYS Structural Engineers Inc. Dr. Canney conducts research focused on engineering education, specifically the development of social responsibility in engineering students. Other areas of interest include ethics, service learning, and sus- tainability
California, San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UC San Diego and the President of eGrove Education, Inc. She incorporates education innovations into courses (Peer Instruction, Project- based learning), prepares next generation faculty, advises student organizations, hears cases of academic misconduct, is responsible for ABET, and is committed to fostering a supportive environment for di- verse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16 curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization.Dr. John E. Bell, Michigan State University JOHN BELL Professor, Educational Technology, College of Education. John Bell earned his
Epistemologies.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is a Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, and the Editor of the Journal of Engineering Education. Her research focuses on the interactions between student mo- tivation and their learning experiences. Her projects focus on student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, development of problem solving skills, self-regulated learn- ing, and epistemic beliefs. She earned a B.S. in Bioengineering from the University of Vermont, and M.S. and Ph.D. in Bioengineering from Clemson University.Dr. Elizabeth G. Creamer, Virginia Tech Dr. Elizabeth G. Creamer is professor emerita, Educational Research and
. Carla B. Zoltowski, Purdue University, West Lafayette Carla B. Zoltowski is an assistant professor of engineering practice in the Schools of Electrical and Com- puter Engineering and (by courtesy) Engineering Education and Director of the Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Program at Purdue University. She holds a B.S.E.E., M.S.E.E., and Ph.D. in Engineer- ing Education, all from Purdue. Prior to this she was Co-Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue where she was responsible for developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her research interests include the professional formation of engineers, diversity, inclusion, and equity in engineering, human-centered
asengineers.First-year engineering programs can also influence a student’s major selection. Students whocomplete a program that allows them to explore the different disciplines available to them havereported the experience confirms their decision to pursue a particular discipline or provides themwith the information to make their discipline selection [12]. This study also reported that eventhough students found first-year engineering programs helpful, most students were unaware ofthe matriculation model their institution used at the time of application.Details About Our ProjectTheoretical FrameworkWe plan to use Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT) as the framework for our project. SCCTstrives to explain the interdependent relationship of people and their
for 13 years in primary pharmaceutical process development, first at SmithKline Beecham and later at GlaxoSmithKline before joining Imperial College London. His main educational research evolves around experiential learning, particularly participatory design, which takes techniques proven to be successful in modern project management and applies them to an educa- tional setting. One key feature is involving students as major stakeholders in designing their own learning.Dr. Colin Paul Hale,Dr. Umang Vinubhai Shah, Imperial College LondonProf. Klaus Hellgardt, Imperial College London c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Hearing you loud and clear: the student voice as a driver for
Paper ID #27011Restructuring the Engineering Activities in a Pre-college Summer ProgramProf. Richard Wayne Freeman P.E., U.S. Coast Guard Academy Prof Richard Freeman is an Assistant Professor at the United States Coast Guard Academy in Mechani- cal Engineering. He is course coordinator for Engineering Experimentation. He is currently working on projects and capstones involving CubeSats and ThinSats. Prof Freeman has previously taught at North- western University, Valparaiso University and Iowa State University. Prof Freeman can be reached at richard.w.freeman@uscga.edu. c American Society for
. TABLE II FINAL COURSE GRADE Final course grades are displayed in the box graphs shown in Fig. 1. The box plotsindicate that the mean averages between the treatment and the control groups are nearlyidentical, with only a 2.03% difference as seen in Table II. Referring to Fig. 1, the maximumfinal course grade exceeds 100%, due to extra credit given during the project (exam #2). Thereare a number of outliers for each semester and for both groups. This is due in part to studentswho stopped attending the course and did not withdraw. Fig. 1 indicates that the median finalcourse grades for both groups was identical, once again indicating that the hybrid laboratory hadno negative effect on the student learning
equipment suppliers include theacquisition and installation costs only. The operating and maintenance costs are not included.Impact on CurriculumThe impact of the systems engineering approach to small satellite testing and the potentialchanges in the curriculum are discussed below.Students will be guided to follow a basic system engineering approach to the overall project oftesting small satellites. Each satellite to be tested has common and special characteristics andrequirements that need to be identified and addressed in the process of generating the testingprocedures, scheduling and implementation.The approach discussed here follows the engineering practices and basic procedures establishedby INCOSE (International Council of Systems Engineering
the Writing Across the Curriculum initiative and coordinates the undergraduate writing courses. Currently, she is working on a project examining writing strategies used by engineers in multinational workplaces and the impact of these findings on WAC/WID programs. Her primary research and teaching interests are multilingual writers, writing across the curriculum and writing in the disciplines (WAC/WID), and first-year writing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Impact of Socio-Cultural Factors in Qatar on Females in EngineeringAbstractThis paper provides a detailed insight into the Arab culture, specifically, the perceptions ofQatari culture on women in engineering. The Qatari
education, medium frequency transformer optimization, and electric vehicle fast charger design optimization. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 The Shift from the Two to Four-Year Institute: How Research Experiences Impact Community College StudentsIntroductionResearch is messy and ill-defined. It provides society with new ideas, innovations, andchallenges. Undergraduate research is a project-based learning experience with little structure orguidelines. It can be overwhelming and intimidating to a student. Typical classroom workconsists of textbook-based homework assignments or projects with rubrics, guidelines, andstraight forward
memory in detail, such as howto access and process data in a cache scheme. Therefore, it can be achallenge for a student to learn, design, and implement a multi-core cache memory. In addition, in the aspect of teaching computerarchitecture, a practical teaching methodology is needed. Since thetraditional classroom lecture-based teaching has many limitationson the learning capability, team-based learning methodologieshave been adapted in many disciplines in the areas of science andengineering. For the disciplines of computer science and computerengineering, project-based learning has been used as a popularmethodology in helping students to understand course materialsand to apply theoretical knowledge to solve real-world
to the principles ofoperation and electrical behavior of a number of electronic devices (principally the p-n junctiondiode, the MOSFET, and the BJT). An understanding of the I-V characteristics of these devicesis indispensable to understanding their use in circuits exploiting them as either linear or nonlineardevices. While simulation is valuable, it is arguably not a replacement of the demonstration ofthe I-V characteristics of real devices. A brief survey of ASEE literature on educational use ofcurve tracers is summarized below.Shwehdi et al [1] described a senior design project to build an instrument for measurement of thecurrent gain of NPN BJTs. This was not a curve tracer per se.Beams [2] described curve tracers that used an ad hoc
right or left to reduce the horizontalposition error to a low range acceptable for a locked on target condition. If the rotation constant wastoo high the Drone could gyrate left and right never locking onto target. If the rotation constant was toolow the Drone would take a long time to lock onto the target.In addition to the above the students also needed to understand the Blue Green Red (BGR) and the HueSaturation Value (HSV) color model. The shape of the object or marker did not matter, so long as thecolor was within the HSV high/low limits set in the track/follow code. The students had to insure thoseacceptable HSL colors were not in the area where the Drone was operating.The students did not know how to program coming into the REAP project
in projects andextracurricular activities completed outside the classroom, than those completed within thetransdisciplinary classroom. This information has proved beneficial for program staff as theycontinue to make programmatic improvements.1. IntroductionMultidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary engineering and technology programsare growing in popularity and prior studies have identified advantages to students whoparticipate in these innovative, boundary-crossing programs. Students develop higher levels ofcognitive processing and critical thinking [1], report positive attitudes toward literacy [2],improve research skills [3] and display high levels of teamwork and leadership skills [4]. Thesefindings are by no means
this project is to teach students to understand basiccryptography techniques, how cryptography is used in protecting sensitivedata, understand the basics of Internet hygiene, and how social engineeringcan be used to steal your identity. The lesson is broken into 3 activities: (1) ModernSubstitution Ciphers: Caesar Cipher and other Basic Ciphers, (2) Modern Encryption:Encryption: Public-Key, and (3) Social Engineering: Mortimer’s Social Public-KeyMedia. In the Substitution Cipher activity, students will learn to use simple Introduction to Public
classroom andcombine pre-recorded videos, in class activities and lectures (which distance students cancomplete on their on schedule or connect to in real time using video conferencing software),online assessments and bona fide course-integrated research and development projects. Whererelevant certifications existed (and are available to be taken by students), the courses weremapped to the objectives for these certifications. Courses have targeted EC Council’s CertifiedEthical Hacker and Certified Hacking Forensic Investigator certifications and CompTIA’sSecurity+ certification.The graduate certificate is designed to be able to be completed in conjunction with a graduatedegree program or on a stand-alone basis. The certificate is designed, in
robot’senvironment by means of laser projection. Zieliński provides an object-oriented approach forrobot programming [10]. Freund et al. discuss a process-oriented approach to efficient off-lineprogramming of industrial robots, presenting two approaches: automatic trajectory generationand tech-in/playback programming using virtual reality techniques [11].In industry, the most widely used method for robot programming is by using teach pendants [12].A user uses the pendant to guide a robot along the path of completing a desired task. At the sametime, at different points along the path, coordinates are recorded. After the task is complete, therecorded points can be played back at a slower speed to verify the accuracy of the program. Anactive focus of research
the picture when thinking aboutimplementing diversity and inclusion policies and programming within higher education institutions. Given the persistent gap in underrepresented groups pursuing aviation careers, and after areview of the prior research, a pilot project was conducted during the summer of 2018 and included aquantitative questionnaire that was administered to select aviation students. Given that existingresearch indicates a need for a more holistic approach to diversity and inclusion policies andprogramming, the primary research question was “Do diversity and inclusion policies impactcollegiate students’ considerations for leaving an (aviation) academic program?”Methods Much of the existing research that is conducted
sent to their classrooms. The participant pairs are assigned and then the students split intotwo classrooms with one lead teacher and multiple aids in the room. The agenda consists ofbuilding the Kano (30 minutes), a two-part lesson plan to learn some basics of programming theKano (an hour and a half before lunch and an hour after lunch) and time to work on their selfselected projects for the showcase (about an hour). The two teachers are given the same set ofslides and teaching directions to go through the curriculum provided. At the end of the day, thestudents present their projects at the showcase to each other and family members. They are alsogiven certificates for participating and information on how to access their projects later. Lastly
Mechanical Engineering Technology,Electrical Engineering Technology or Mechatronics Engineering Technology majors.The mission of the Robotics concentration is to conduct world-class research and teaching to trainfuture generations of thinkers and creators.Robotics concentration students at [University Name] will be a part of an intellectually stimulatingenvironment where they will participate in project-based courses and are encouraged to make high-impact contributions to research.The undergraduate Robotics concentration is designed to help students meet their professionalobjectives. Each course in this concentration contains a significant level of robotics and automationprinciples for high-demand occupational areas. Students choose to use this
experiences, and the connection between the two.Dr. Kadri Akinola Akanni Parris, Ohio State University Dr. Kadri A.A. Parris is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Engineering Education at The Ohio State University (OSU). He is the holder of a Master’s Degree in Transportation Engineering and received his Doctorate in Civil Engineering (Geotechnical) with a concentration in Pavement Design, both at OSU. In addition, he holds Project Management Professional (PMP) certification with the Project Management Institute (PMI). Dr. Parris is actively involved in curriculum design, introduction of innovative pedagogies of engagement and the practice of engineering education through teaching several courses across the department
Hospital, Royal Oak, and was a research associate in radiology, nuclear medicine, and bio- mechanics at Wayne State University. Ken has taught at Lawrence Tech evening programs as an adjunct instructor since 1965. His senior projects class, where students generate project ideas, research, design, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Paper ID #24614manufacture, and assess the market for inventive products is the capstone course. Cook also has enjoyeda long side career in magic finding his hobby very useful in teaching. A highlight for his students eachyear is the two-hour magic performance he offers as a
development and analysis of educational technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 PRIME: Engaging STEM Undergraduates in Computer Science with Intelligent Tutoring SystemsIntroductionThis NSF IUSE project focuses on the design, development, and evaluation of PRIME, anintelligent tutoring system for introductory computing. We define computing as the creativedesign, implementation, and analysis of artifacts to solve computational problems. Leveragingadvanced intelligent tutoring systems technologies, PRIME will provide integrated problem-solving and motivational support dynamically tailored to individual students over the course oftheir problem-solving sessions. PRIME is being
that participants were screened in an attempt to work withfaculty who may feel overwhelmed or believe they could be performing more optimally. Thework was also similar in that the PI followed up with participants over the term of the project tohelp participants keep the training in mind.McKenna, Johnson, Yoder, Guerra and Pimmel [2] evaluated the efficacy of virtual facultydevelopment. Their work also assumed that faculty development works best when it is timedistributed and since travel to a meeting is prohibitive in terms of time and money theyimplemented a virtual format for faculty development. The development focus was on creatingand maintaining communities of practice for the adoption of research based teaching practices.The work being
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Preliminary Findings on Students’ Beliefs about IntelligenceAbstractThe goal of this project is to better understand the beliefs that undergraduate students hold abouttheir own intelligence and how these beliefs change during their undergraduate engineeringeducation. The research team has used the theoretical framework established by Carol Dweck onMindset and how different fixed and growth mindsets affect success. Fixed mindset individualsbelieve that their intelligence is an unchanging trait, while people with a growth mindset believethat through effort they can grow and develop greater intelligence. Prior researchers have shownthat individuals with a growth mindset respond to
security. Education inthe field of cybersecurity suffers from natural difficulties because of these factors. Any tool thatcan ease the way of students and educators alike to explore cybersecurity is vital to meeting thedemands of a more interconnected world than ever.Offering courses in cybersecurity is an effective way to educate about the theoretical aspects ofsecurity. However, a workshop of recognized experts run by ACM's education board determinedwithout a doubt that studying theory is not enough to prepare a potential cybersecurityprofessional (McGettrick, 2013). In the light of the shift of infrastructure from physical toelectronic control and the rising number and severity of cyber-attacks, the DETER project wascreated (Mirkovic, et al
engagement with those ideas. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Engineering Design In Scientific InquiryAbstractThe Engineering Design in Scientific Inquiry (EDISIn) Project addresses the engineeringpreparation of secondary science teachers by embedding engineering design into a science coursefor single-subject STEM education majors (future secondary teachers), and developing asequence of lesson plans and annotated video for faculty who seek to embed engineering designin their science courses. While undergraduate laboratories are rich with designed experimentalapparatus, it is rare that students themselves play a role in designing and producing artifacts inthe service of
engineers (28 hydraulicsengineering students and 24 transportation engineering students) participated as subjects in thedata collection efforts. Based on our current literature review, this is the largest eye-tracking /reflective interview study of problem solving that has been conducted to date. The interview andvisual attention data was used to document seven (comprehensive, experimental effect,familiarity, judgement, simplicity, speed, and stepwise) problem solving rationales in response tothe transportation engineering questions and five (speed, familiarity, accuracy, confidence andsimplicity) problem solving rationales in response to the hydraulics engineering questions.Project GoalsThere are four main goals associated with this project. They
and Environmental Catalysis Group in 2017 under Dr. Mark Crocker and Dr. Eduardo Santillan-Jiminez, where her work was one of UK CAER’s first collaborative projects with the University of Grenoble Alps Pagora Engineering School of Pulp and Paper processing. Focusing on the thermochemical degradation process of cellulosic biomass during conversion to bio-oil, Sarah traveled to Grenoble, France for three months to begin her research and has since continued the project at UKCAER. In her time at UK CAER Sarah has been awarded a UK Summer Research Grant, a Kentucky Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research, Research Scholars Program (EPSCoR RSP) Grant, and a National Science Foundation International Research