times for two-hour sessions. All course materialsand homework were retained as data. This study chronicles the learning of the student andhighlights abilities the student mastered as well as difficulties that were encountered. By the endof the course, the student able to read and sketch both orthographic and isometric views of parts.There was also evidence that the student created and used spatial imagery of parts that included3D aspects.Literature reviewGraphical communication is a fundamental part of engineering. Correspondingly, spatialreasoning ability is a predictor of success in engineering school. The ability to mentally rotate3D objects seems especially important [1]. Students’ abilities in these areas can be increasedthrough
, Gül3, and Lee, Kristen4 1 Penn State Brandywine 2 Penn State Berks 3 Iowa State University 4 University of San FranciscoAbstractThis work presents the results of an assessment instrument designed to assess the progressivelearning of ethics in the engineering curriculum at different stages known as acclimation,competency, and proficiency, and to determine the relation of the development stages with threecomponents that contribute to learning: interest, knowledge and strategic processing. Thequestions in the instrument were defined following the Model of Domain Learning (MDL) tocapture the
traditionalteaching methods. The proposed VR teaching modules allow students 1) to experience the senseof being present in a virtual queuing system environment that is representative of a real-worldengineering situation, 2) to expand their natural perceptive abilities and authentic experience, and3) to eliminate the need to deal with any expensive equipment or risky environments to understandthe application of queuing theory. The purpose of the research is to investigate how well studentsgained conceptual knowledge of queuing theory using the developed VR teaching module.Queueing theory is defined as the mathematical study of waiting lines. In this study students wereprovided a conceptual queuing theory quiz after the VR teaching module, and then they
the Challenger launchdecision, the Alaska Airlines flight 261 crash, and the Piper Alpha oilrig fire. We received 47responses in the Fall 2016 semester and 101 responses in the Spring 2017 semester fromundergraduate and graduate students enrolled in Purdue’s Aeronautics and Astronauticsdepartment. Our initial statistical analysis indicates that there may be a correlation between astudent’s performance in and exposure to systems engineering-related classes and the student’sperformance on our survey.1 IntroductionAs the complexity of the systems we build increases, so does the demand for systems engineers[Hutchison et al., 2016; SERC, 2013; Chaput & Mark, 2013]. 23% of all engineers in the U.S. areover the age of 55, which means there
interview data from educators who did not perceiveany significant challenges also sheds light on the circumstances and strategies that facilitateeffective ESI instruction.IntroductionEthics has been recognized as an important part of engineering education and professionalresponsibility. The inclusion in accreditation criteria [1] and professional codes [2] providesan impetus for fostering ethical awareness and judgment. In a systematic literature reviewof engineering ethics education articles, Hess and Fore found that 65% of the interventionswere justified or motivated by ABET accreditation [3]. Despite its importance, there are anumber of “systemic barriers to effective ethics education” [4, p. 346]. One challenge is alack of student engagement
-oriented teaching strategies [1], [2]. After a review ofcurrent literature, Prince concluded that engineering faculty should consider new instructionalmethods, including active learning strategies, in their classrooms, as he found compellingevidence regarding the efficacy of student-centered teaching practices [3].In a meta-analysis of 225 studies, Freeman et al. evaluated instructional practices inundergraduate STEM classes to better understand the impact of active learning on students [4].The authors found that student performance on examinations or concept inventories was higher,approximately 6%, with active learning instruction. Further, their analysis demonstrated thatstudents were 1.5 times more likely to fail a course if they were enrolled
graphically by frequency of response. TheInternal Review Board at our institution waived full board review and granted approval forcampus dissemination of the survey instrument. Prior to taking the survey, respondents wereasked to electronically indicate their acceptance to a consent statement or to opt out.Results and DiscussionOne hundred ninety five students and twenty faculty responded to the survey, Table 1. Sixfaculty and five students were interviewed. Four of the six interviewed faculty had tenure. Anoversight on the survey instrument was that we did not ask the faculty if they had tenure so wecould not make downstream comparisons on this basis. Table 1: Students and faculty members that responded to questions by survey and interview
engineering courses for over five years. His previous research involved thermal management systems for military vehicles. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference Using the SCALE-UP Method to Create an Engaging First Year Engineering Course (Extended Abstract) 1 David J. Ewing – The University of Texas at ArlingtonAbstractTo meet the growing demands for professional engineers, much emphasis has been placed onrecruiting and retaining increasing numbers of engineering students. In response, the Universityof Texas at Arlington (UTA) performed a
. The paperalso presents the results of the implementation of the curriculum, as well as a comparison of theoutcomes of the online course with those from a regular, face-to-face course. Student performanceon labs and tests in the two parallel sections of the course are compared. Additionally studentsurveys conducted in both the online and face-to-face courses are used to document and comparestudents’ perceptions of their learning experience, the effectiveness of the course resources, theiruse of these resources, and their overall satisfaction with the course.1. IntroductionOne of the main recommendations of the 2012 President’s Council of Advisors on Science andTechnology (PCAST) report, “Engage to Excel,” is to address the retention problem in
changing the pitch of the blades to keep thesurfaces above the “overhang” threshold of 45 degrees. Metal 3D printing, unlike FDM printing,requires higher consideration for detrimental design features and potential failure-modes. Mostof the design features of concern are described in detail in the following section.III. Design feature issues in Metal 3D printingIn designing for metal AM (specifically in the SLM process), a number of design features mustbe eliminated before starting a build job [3]. Due to incompatibility with the powder melting © American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Figure 1. Highlighted overhanging regions and
education suffers from a lack of student interest and learningchallenges due to extensive mathematical concepts, operations with geometry and the abstractionof concepts [1, 2]. Different approaches have been proposed to address the challenges, such ashands-on-experimentation [2], the inclusion of computer aided design tools [3] and, morerecently, augmented reality (AR) techniques [4]. Recent rise in popularity of 3D-enabled screensand highly improved capabilities of graphical processing units (GPUs), it is now possible togenerate complex and real-time 3D visualizations that facilitate teaching of broad scientifictopics [5]. Literature survey shows that 3D visualization assisted teaching has been proposed forvarious fields such as anatomy [6
questions were designed togage how much impact the sessions have had regarding knowledge of and attitudes toward theengineering profession. Both objective and subjective question forms were utilized.MotivationWriting on Dartmouth College’s achievement of awarding more than half of its undergraduateengineering degrees in Spring 2016 to women, Dean of Engineering Joseph Helble stated “Weneed to educate increasing numbers of talented and creative engineers, drawn from all corners ofsociety” [1]. That is absolutely true. To reach those far corners, recruitment of diverseengineering candidates cannot happen just during freshman year of college, or even during highschool. Many researchers have demonstrated that perceptions of technical careers in general
learners access toeducational experiences that typically have been limited by the need to be present in a physicalclassroom. However, MOOC virtual environments presents unique challenges for bothinstructors and learners. One of these challenges is the lack of face-to-face interaction, whichaffects how learners engage with one another and with the instruction team. From aconstructivist perspective, this is problematic because social interaction and communication arevital to meaningful learning [1]. Communication is also necessary for instructors to answerquestions, clarify concepts, and guide learners through their knowledge construction.In order to facilitate social interaction and communication, MOOCs often use discussion forumswhere learners can
theamount of diversity that can be displayed within the context of a single assignment. It isimportant to note that we are not analyzing the assignment solutions for correctness but onlylooking at the thinking and organizational strategies used at this time.2. Theoretical Foundations based in Writing to LearnLearning to program is a complex process that could benefit from Writing to Learn (WTL)strategies. The struggles of novice programmers is well documented [1]. A commonly citedfactor is “fragile knowledge,” which is knowledge that is incomplete and superficial [2].Students who effectively employ metacognitive strategies, such as reflection and self-assessment, are more likely to master the problem solving skills that are essential toprogramming
learning activities and real-life scenarios applied in her courses, students experience the application of technical concepts being taught and non-technical skills for big picture problem solvingDr. Michael Robinson P.E., Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Michael Robinson is an Associate Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Collaborative Process Leading to Adoption of ASCE BOK3 Consistent with ABETAbstractThe Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Department of Civil and Environmental Engineeringidentified the coming release of ASCE BOK3 and the new ABET 1-7
the College of Education at NC State University. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Comparative Analysis on the Engineer of 2020 – A Holistic REU ProgramIntroductionSince the beginning of the millennium, the conceptual Engineer of 2020 established themotivation for early 21st Century engineering curricula [1]. While it has created someimprovement in educational programs, its impact is far more reaching in areas beyond itsoriginal objective, such as Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs). This REU programimproves the traditional REU procedures by incorporating methods that produce the desiredtraits of the Engineer of 2020.The Future Renewable
these exercises, while still retaining the benefits of modular implementation. The benefit ofthese individual modules is that they are self-contained and can be easily implemented into anexisting course. In contrast to larger programmatic implementations, these small-scale modulesare lower in cost and complexity, but also tend to focus on fewer aspects of entrepreneurship andare not necessarily reinforced by the surrounding course content.This paper discusses the implementation of a number of engineering entrepreneurship exercisesand activities into a mechanical engineering senior capstone course sequence. These modulestake the form of 1) an e-learning module, 2) a series of guest lectures, and 3) a businesscompetition. These modules were
requires connecting with individuals regularly. Thiswas more readily accomplished by a large team working a few hours rather than a small teamworking a large number of hours. The philosophy behind the course design stemmed from SethGodin’s apt words on experiential education: “The process involves selling the student on themission, providing access to resources, and then holding her responsible for an outcome thatworks. And repeat. And repeat.”[1]Course ContentTo emphasize the difference between language-specific syntax and general concepts involved inproblem-solving with code, the students learned three different languages. The 10 key conceptswere taught first in JavaScript and then repeated in Python. By repeating the same challenges intwo
, 2016). Society is transitive. Thecultural, moral, technological, economic, environmental, and safety realities of individuals 1 The definition of methodology used here is a collection of methods used to perform the research and analysis. 2 The definition of complex as outlined in Clark, et. al. 2012. along with human beliefs have evolved over time. Students, instructors, and engineers are alla part of society and experience this reality from their own perspective. Case studies, such asthis one, are inherently rooted in Critical Realism.We use a Situative Theory framework to deliver our capstone
for all students tohave their questions addressed fully, we organized tutorials in which approximately 12 studentsworked with a junior SJTU faculty member with experience in writing scientific papers inEnglish (Figure 1). To ensure consistency in teaching across the different tutorial groups anSJTU Professor of Biomedical Engineering, a co-Director of the course who had obtained herdoctoral degree at the University of Oxford and who has many years of experience publishingscientific papers in English, oversaw and monitored the material covered in tutorials. A Chineselanguage version of The Elements of Style by William Strunk, Jr. and E.B. White [1] was used asa textbook for the tutorials. Different tutors adopted somewhat different approaches
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A Course in Differential Equations, Modeling and Simulation for Engineering StudentsIntroductionA course in differential equations generally is taken at a critical point in engineeringcurricula – where a turn is made away from basic math and science courses towardscourses in which basic skills and knowledge are synthesized and applied. This raises thequestion of whether the course should be a mathematics course, an engineering course, ora hybrid. It has been argued [1], with supporting results, that the teaching of differentialequations through the modeling of physical and chemical phenomena is effective becauseit allows students to overcome the cognitive
the majority of users in the US). Since itsversions are backward compatible, and content is never really deleted, its 17 years of operationprobably make it the longest-running learning management system around.The previous paper described Radio Button Response, Option Response (i.e., multiple choicewith more than one correct answer), and Numerical Response problem types, as well as how tocombine them into multi-part problems with calculations that carried forward through some orall of the constituent problems. It also touched on available templates and how to use capabilitiesof the Maxima algebra system, R statistics package, gnuplot plot engine, and Perl scripting [1].Other topics covered by the first paper include pedagogical benefits, such
includeincorporating predictive modelling, entrepreneurial mindset, and just-in-time learning. Therationale behind how this project was designed and modified will be discussed in relation to thecourse goals and course format and some successes will be highlighted. Finally,recommendations will be given for how this project or a similar version of this project could beimplemented in different contexts.IntroductionIn recent years, first-year engineering design courses have received a lot of attention in literatureas a mechanism to increase retention within engineering programs and build an identity as anengineer [1-4]. It has been considered a best practice among introductory engineering designcourse developers to choose projects which highlight the engineering
understand the operation of any other programming language, or the operation of amicroprocessor. Furthermore, assembly has grown in popularity, ranking as the 10th most popu-lar programming language of 2018 according to the IEEE Spectrum [1], making it an importantjob skill. Time-critical sections, such as interrupt service routines or frequently-executed loop,often benefit from optimization in an assembly language.While some textbooks present assembly without reference to higher-level languages, a commonpedagogical approach consists of teaching students to translate from C to assembly [2] [3] [4] forseveral reasons. First, the widespread adoption of the C language [1] means that C is availablefor most microprocessors and microcontrollers, while C
of Delaware, and her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering (2014) from New York University. She is passionate about translational research and engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A FRAMEWORK FOR QUANTIFYING STUDENT SELF-CONFIDENCE AND TASK CHOICE IN ENGINEERING DESIGN-RELATED ACTIVITIES Jenni M. Buckley, PhD1,3, Sara Grajeda, PhD2, Amy E. Trauth, PhD1, Dustyn Roberts, PhD4,1 1 University of Delaware, Department of Mechanical Engineering 2 University of Delaware, Center for Research in Education and Science Policy 3 University of Delaware, College of Education and Human Development
effectiveness of the lab sequence was evaluated in both a qualitative and quantitativemanner. The performance of students in the lab course (n=21) can be compared to performanceof a control group of students who did not opt into the lab course (n=7) and only attended thetraditional lecture course. Assessment of learning was evaluated in three ways: 1) self-perceivedaccomplishment of lab learning objectives reported by students in the lab course through ananonymous survey, 2) instructor evaluation of learning objectives assessed via lab reports, and 3)student performance on the final exam in the traditional style course, ~10 weeks after the labexperiences concluded. The third assessment technique allows us to evaluate the effect ofparticipating in the
professional work experience closely related to their academic focus area.This simultaneous combination of academic and professional work experience has proven tohave a tremendous positive impact on students’ learning and enables them to fully develop theirprofessional identity as engineers early before they graduate. At the completion of the courses,students submit a written report and give an oral presentation to a broader audience on details ofthe work performed and their findings and learning. The experience that students gain throughthis program directly contributes to the new ABET-EAC Student Outcomes (1) through (7).Using a set of rubrics designed based on the ABET-EAC Students Outcomes and in consultationwith the students’ academic advisors
distribution of faculty on each campus at the time of the merger because theyare indicative of the relative size of each institution regarding human and physical resources andthe number of courses offered on each campus. Table 1. Campus Enrollment (2014) UTB UTPA 8,200 21,000 91% Hispanic 89% Hispanic Table 2. CS Faculty at the time of the Merger UTB UTPA 8
education.Prof. Henry Hess, Columbia University Henry Hess received the Dr.rer.nat. in Physics from the Free University Berlin, Germany, in 1999. He is currently a Professor of Biomedical Engineering at Columbia University, New York, a member of the External Advisory Board of Nano Letters since 2010, and serves as the Editor-in-Chief of the IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience since 2014. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 A hybrid engineering course combining case-based and lecture-based teaching 1. Abstract Engineering and business school courses both aim to teach students to solve problems, but theapproaches they use to reach that objective are traditionally perceived as
learning in bothprograms.IntroductionThis evidence-based practice paper outlines how to implement aspects of kinesthetic learningeffectively in the classroom through an ”escape room” activity for small-sized engineeringprograms.In today’s engineering classrooms, students are often sedentary for the majority of the classperiod. Learning usually occurs visually, auditorily or through reading and writing. Even asactive learning such as a class discussion is going on students are sitting in their seats. However,some students may require movement of some form in order to learn which can also be known askinesthetic learning. VARK (Visual, Aural, Read/write, and Kinesthetic) is one approach used tocategorize these different types of learning styles [1