Resources make the decision based on apparent qualifications? How do we ensure faculty is prepared to teach for the College? Dimension 2- Course Assignments 10, 11, 13, Who and what determines which course(s) adjunct faculty will 14, 15, 16 teach and which specific adjunct faculty to assign to a specific course? Dimension 3- Faculty Performance 18, 19, 20 Are adjunct faculty rated? If so, by whom? How often? Dimension 4- College Communication Who is tasked with informing adjunct faculty of
. [Online]. Available: https://michaelhyatt.com/why-after-action-reviews-are-so-important/ K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.[4] A. Badir, J. Liao, T. Kunberger, G.I. Papkov, L.D. Nguyen, and R. O’Neill, “Exam wrappers, reflection, and student performance in engineering mechanics,” in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition 2018, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, June, 2018.[5] P. Gezer-Templeton, E. Mayhew, D. Korte, and S. Schmidt, “Use of exam wrappers to enhance students’ metacognitive skills in a large introductory food science and human nutrition course,” Journal Of Food Science Education, vol 16, no. 1, pp. 28-36, 2017.[6] K.J. Metzger, B.A. Smith, E. Brown, and P.A.G. Soneral, “SMASH: A
, 2006, 170(3):971-986. [3] Thursby J G , Kemp S . Growth and Productive Efficiency of UniversityIntellectual Property Licensing[J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(1):109-124. [4] Kao C , Hung H T . Efficiency analysis of university departments: An empiricalstudy[J]. Omega, 2008, 36(4):p.653-664. [5] Liu wei , Cao jianguo, Zheng linchang, et al. Evaluation of scientific andtechnological innovation capability of Chinese universities based on principal componentanalysis [J]. Research and development management,2010(06):125-131. (in Chinese) [6] Dong yelu. Evaluation of scientific and technological innovation ability ofChinese universities based on factor analysis [J]. Research on scientific management,2015(6):32-34. (in Chinese) [7] Guo
inaugural Faculty Associate for Mobile Learning. He has a Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Wyoming (Laramie, Wyoming). He has approximately 25 publications/presentations. He is a member of the American Society for Engineer- ing Education (ASEE). He is the recipient of David S. Taylor Service to Students Award and Golden Apple Award from Boise State University. He is also the recipient of ASEE Pacific Northwest Section (PNW) Outstanding Teaching Award, ASEE Mechanical Engineering division’s Outstanding New Edu- cator Award and several course design awards. He serves as the campus representative (ASEE) for Boise State University and as the Chair-Elect for the ASEE PNW Section. His academic research
those who did not to determine if thereexists a similar pattern to that found with students who took the surveys and those who did not.Question Q20 – How do you think you are doing in your engineering courses? – was only addedto the mid-semester survey in the fall 2019 semester. The main motivation when the survey wasfirst done was assessing student performance in their mathematics and science courses. Theauthors plan to report on results of this newer survey question in future work.References[1] S. Gratiano and W. Palm, Can a five-minute, three-question survey foretell first-yearengineering student performance and retention?, Proceedings of the 123rd ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA.[2] M. Anderson-Rowland, A first year
. When reading, I try to connect the things I am reading about with what I already know.Reference[1] G. Mason, T. R. Shuman, and K. E. Cook, "Inverting (Flipping) Classrooms – Advantages and Challenges," presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia, 2013/06/23, June 2013. Available: https://peer.asee.org/19842[2] R. Bachnak and S. C. Maldonado, "A Flipped Classroom Experience: Approach and Lessons Learned," presented at the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2014/06/15, June 2014. Available: https://peer.asee.org/19942[3] C. J. Prust, R. W. Kelnhofer, and O. G. Petersen, "The Flipped Classroom: It's (Still) All About Engagement," presented at
work under the auspices of the National Science Foundation (NSF) undergrant number # 1644743. However, any items expressed in this paper do not necessarilyrepresent the views of NSF or its affiliates.References[1] M. Z. Lagoudas, S. Y. Yoon, and R. Boehm, “The Implementation and Assessment of an I- Corps Site: Lessons Learned,” Proceedings of the 126th American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference and Exposition, Tampa, FL, USA, 2019.[2] G. Lichtenstein, and T. Monroe-White, “Entrepreneurial mindset assessment reviews,” 2016. Available: https://venturewell.org/wp-content/uploads/EMAR-v1-1.pdf[3] S. Zappe, “Avoiding construct confusion: An attribute-focused approach to assessing
, students recognize the importance of solving problems completely with thecorrect comprehension of physical and mathematical meanings of variables in the governingequations.References[1] M. S. a. C. C. B. Z. Dymond, "The Influence of Grading Bias on Reinforced Concrete Exam Scores at Three Different Universities," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, June 24-17, 2018.[2] A. Karimi, "Bringing Uniformity in Topic Coverage and Grading Fairness in Multiple," in International Mechanical Engineering Congress, 2015.[3] A. C. K. a. W. Sander, "Grades and Student Evaluations of Teachers," Economics of Education Review, pp. 59-63, 1999.[4] C. E. Work, "Nationwide Study of the Variability of Test Scoring by Different
REACT is currently limited to teachers within the state, we feel the best way to reachother states is by sharing our model with other research institutions around the country. We arecurrently working with a research group at Cornell University to implement a similar annualworkshop that will serve their region. 10References[1] A. King, “From Sage on the Stage to Guide on the Side,” Coll. Teach., 2010.[2] C. Papanastasiou, “School, teaching and family influence on student attitudes toward science: Based on TIMSS data for Cyprus,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 71–86, Jan. 2002.[3] J. Osborne, S. Simon, and S
Summary and Future DirectionThe authors piloted a ND EPSCoR NATURE bridge camp at TMCC during the summer of 2019.The authors wanted to prepare participants for college in a manner that would also get themexcited about and interested in pursuing a STEM degree and career. The structure of the campconsisted of face-to-face sessions and three independent projects aimed at developing a mindsetthat will ultimately help participants succeed in college. Each independent project built uponknowledge gained during that face-to-face sessions and previous independent project(s). Theauthors believe this systematic process of progressively giving the participants moreresponsibility and less instruction over the course of the camp helped to promote the self
community was purposefully expanded to include center and university, parents andwomen of color in STEM to further improve the self-efficacy of the girls [27], [28].MethodologyThis research is part of a larger exploratory, longitudinal, 2-year mixed methods study. Theinitial phase was focused on unveiling areas of challenge in student perception, CT thinkingpractices, and STEM +CT integration. Student voice was optimized to help refine and evolve theintegration of STEM and the CT activities. CT thinking practices were pulled by the universityresearch team from Weintrop et al.’s Taxonomy of CT [15]. Those practices include DataCollection, Data Creation, Understanding a System as a Whole, Understanding the RelationshipBetween Parts of a System
will soon build on the current momentum from this seedgrant project to scale up our study.AcknowledgmentsThis work is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant#1738214. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this paper,however, are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.References[1] M. H. Davis, “Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensionalapproach,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 113-126, 1983.[2] J. J. Shah, S. M. Smith, and N. Vargas-Hernandez, “Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness,” Design Studies, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 111-134, 2003.[3] Ş. Purzer, W. P. Myers, and D
, and economic criteria and reflects balance of dimensions13. Uses and/or creates innovation(s) in its specific field to achievesustainability14. Worked with experts from other disciplines (i.e., outsideengineering) to enhance process or final designMethodsIn Fall 2019, 35 civil engineering seniors at The Citadel were recruited to apply the SustainableDesign Rubric to their capstone projects. In place of one of their regular Water and WastewaterSystems classes, students attend an active 1.5 hour session to learn about and apply the Rubricthrough individual reflection and group discussions. For participating in the session, studentsearned bonus points on one of the course’s design projects. Students were in their first semesterof a two-semester
-Constructive-Interactive: A Conceptual Framework for Differentiating Learning Activities,” Top. Cogn. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–105, Jan. 2009.[4] S. Freeman et al., “Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 1–6, 2014.[5] C. E. Wieman, “Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., vol. 111, no. 23, pp. 8319–8320, 2014.[6] M. Stains et al., “Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities,” Science (80-. )., vol. 359, no. 6383, pp. 1468–1470, 2018.[7] P. Shekhar and M. Borrego, “After the workshop: A case study of post-workshop implementation of active
-scale prototype (Figure 1)using toy cars but says it will be easy to build to scale. The team is confident that once the codeis refined, it will be simple to build a bigger scale system.The design could have other uses outside of construction work zones. It could also be useful inpublic safety, for hurricanes and other emergencies, especially to close roads and route traffic inone direction. If there’s a power outage, and traffic lights are inoperable, this system can be usedat these locations, a s well. Figure 1: Traffic Solver Proof of ConceptRobotic HandAnother senior design team is improving a robotic hand for sign language application. The teamwas tasked to add wrist and arm movements to spell particular letters
. Maxwell and Z. H. Merchant, "Using Mobile Learning to Improve Low Success Rate in Engineering Courses," in Proceedings of the 125th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2018.[3] S. B. Velegol, S. E. Zappe and M. L. Brannon, "Online modules enable prerequisite review and mastery during design courses," in Proceedings of the 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, 2014.[4] "Learning Glass," [Online]. Available: https://www.learning.glass/. [Accessed 3 February 2019].[5] H. L. Weiss, "Work in Progress: Using Videos for Improvement in Knowledge of Prerequisite Material," in Proceedings of the 126th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida, 2019.[6] C. J. Brame
universaldesign for learning and quality improvement, as described in this work, will be increasinglyimportant.References:[1] J. Allen, I. Elaine|Seaman, “Digital Compass Learning: Distance Education Enrollment Report 2017.,” Babson Surv. Res. Gr., May 2017.[2] F. Martin and S. Kumar, “Frameworks for Assessing and Evaluating e-Learning Courses and Programs,” in Leading and Managing e-Learning, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 271–280.[3] “Quality Matters Rubric.” [Online]. Available: https://www.qualitymatters.org/qa- resources/rubric-standards/higher-ed-rubric. [Accessed: 16-Oct-2019].[4] M. G. Moore, “Three types of interaction,” Am. J. Distance Educ., 1989.[5] T. Anderson, “Getting the mix right again
wide range of projects. I am interested in exploringavenues to democratize this form of education to help more students from all backgrounds haveaccess to these opportunities. References [1] Vosniadou, Stella. How Children Learn. Educational Practices Series, I nternational Bureau of Education, 2001. [2] S. Bell. Project-Based Learning for the 21st Century: Skills for the Future, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83:2, 39-43, 2010. [3] Y. Li, A. H. Schoenfeld, A. A. diSessa, A. C. Graesser, L. C. Benson, L. D. English, and R. A. Duschl. Design and Design Thinking in STEM Education. Journal for STEM Education Research, 2: 93–104, 2019. [4
energy for the transformation (c) Transmission- or energy distribution system that distributes energy to the system component (d) Control system, Composed of sub-systems for controlling, supervising and inspection of other systems’ state and performance, creating man/machine interface, and establishing the human safety system (e) Frame system that keeps the whole system together in space, and (g) Helping system(s) that Solves different necessary helping tasks [15]. The design process using this method starts with the identification of the sub-systems needed for the
communication courses: https://bulletin.engin.umich.edu/courses/techcomm/ Students are required to take Exposition and Argumentation (English 1120) during the freshman year. Students are also required to take one of four communication-related courses: Engineering Communications and Computations Missouri University of (CIV ENG 2003), Writing and Research (English 1160), Technical Writing Science and Technology (English 3560), or Principles of Speech (SP&M S 1185). http://catalog.mst.edu/undergraduate/degreeprogramsandcourses/environmentale
Yes 3 model(s) did your Did you update yourElectrical Engineering group use? Other project plan often, 4 Did you ever have (Select all that based on new
”, Cambridge University Press, 2018.[2] L. Hellsten, S. Martin, L. McIntyre and A. Kinzel, ”Women on the Academic Tenure Track: An Autoethnographic Inquiry”, International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011.[3] National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, ”Survey of Doctorate Recipients”, National Science Foundation, 2015.[4] J. Roy, ”Engineering by the numbers”, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019.[5] Y. Yang and D. Carroll, ”Understanding Female STEM Faculty Experiences of Subtle Gender Bias from Microaggressions Perspective”, in Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Expo, 2016.[6] A. G d’Entremont and H. Gustafson, ”PANEL: Gender bias in student evaluations of
. A. Mason, “Online Mathematics Homework Increases Student Achievement,” AERA Open, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 233285841667396, 2016, doi: 10.1177/2332858416673968.[10] R. A. and T. Williams, “The Effectiveness of Online Homework in an Introductory Science Class,” J. Coll. Sci. Teach., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 28–31, 2006.[11] S. Hauk, R. A. Powers, and A. Segalla, “A Comparison of Web-based and Paper-and- Pencil Homework on Student Performance in College Algebra,” Primus, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 61–79, 2015, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2014.906006.[12] J. T. Callahan, “Assessing Online Homework in First-Semester Calculus,” Primus, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 545–556, 2016, doi: 10.1080/10511970.2015.1128501.[13] P. G. Larose
analysis/design principles for UAVs are very similar to the principles developed over the years andused successfully for the analysis/design of manned aircraft. A UAV designer need to know how to integratecomplex, multi-disciplinary systems, and to understand the environment, the requirements and the designchallenges. A UAS is much more than a reusable air vehicle or vehicles. The UAS includes five basicelements: 1. The Environment in which the UAV(s) or the Systems Element operates (e.g., the airspace,the data links, communications system). 2. The air vehicle(s) or the Air Vehicle Element. 3. The groundcontrol station or the Mission Control Element. 4. The payload(s) or the Payload Element. 5. The launchand recovery systems which includes the
experiential learning to beginbuilding patterns in their minds about how water moves past objects.Hands-On Demo. The streamline visualization activity is described to students asDesign-Build-Test-Communicate (DBTC) practice: • Design: a visual that shows how water flows around an ROV to help determine center of drag (aka center of pressure) • Build: prototype using dominoes falling as the ”streamlines” around the ROV • Test: use a rod to start all lines of dominoes falling at once; record video; note where the dominoes fall “slower” around the ROV; interpret how the shape and orientation of the ROV contributes to “slower flow” and increased drag • Communicate: make 1-2 slides on why you chose this design; picture(s) of the
thesis, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, April 2019.[10] S. Holder, and J. Lange, “Looking and listening: A mixed-methods study of space use and user satisfaction,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, vol.9, no.3, pp.4-27, 2014.[11] Y. Lee, E. Young, T.H. Lee, and L. Velez, "Planning library spaces and services for millennials: An evidence-based approach," Library Management, vol.34, no.6/7, pp. 498-511, Aug.9, 2013.[12] J. Briden, “"Photo surveys: Eliciting more than you knew to ask for," in Studying Students: The Undergraduate Research Project at the University of Rochester, Editors, N. F. Foster, and S.L. Gibbons, Association of College & Research Libraries, 2007. [Online
inEngineering,” Worcester Polytechnic Institute Digital WPI, May 2014, Retrieved fromhttps://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all/345[6] R.A. Reiser and W. Dick “Instructional planning: a guide for teachers,” Boston: Allyn andBacon. 1996. 2nd ed.[7] G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding By Design, Published by Association forSupervision & Curriculum Development, 2005, 2nd Expanded Edition.[8] Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University, www.scu.edu/ethics/ethics-resources/[9] S. L. Ash, and P.H. Clayton, “Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The powerof critical reflection in applied learning.” Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education, vol.1, no 1, pp. 25-48, 2009.
,” J. Microbiol. Biol. Educ., vol. 17, no. 1 pp. 156-62. Mar. 2016.[5] A. M. Depelteau, et al., “SYMBIOSIS: development, implementation, and assessment of amodel curriculum across biology and mathematics at the introductory level,” CBE Life Sci Educ.,vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 342-7. Fall 2010.[6] J. S. Krim, et al., “Models and Impacts of Science Research Experiences: A Review of theLiterature of CUREs, UREs, and TREs,” CBE Life Sci Educ., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. ar65. Winter2019.[7] E. Afgan, et al., “The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborativebiomedical analyses: 2018 update,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 46, no. W1, pp. W537–W544,July 2018.[8] “Endicott College Bioinformatics: VCF2FA ,” Endicott College November 26, 2019.[Online
more help with? Is there a team member, advisor, or other person who can help you with those things?3rd Term Questions:Backward-looking (before you started the project): 25. What process did you go through to produce this piece? 26. Does this work tell a story? 27. What area(s) of growth are you most proud of?Inward-looking (how you feel about it right now): 28. What were your standards for this piece of work? Do you feel you met those standards? 29. What does this piece of work reveal about you as a learner, or about how you learn? 30. What did you learn about yourself as you worked on this piece?Outward-looking (how you think others feel about it right now): 31. What grade would you give yourself for this work? 32. If
, doi: 10.1007/s11229-012-0179-7.[5] M. O’Rourke, S. Crowley, and C. Gonnerman, “On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A philosophical framework,” Stud. Hist. Philos. Sci. Part C Stud. Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci., vol. 56, pp. 62–70, Apr. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.10.003.[6] D. Ellis, “Changing the lens: The role of reframing in educational development,” Improve Acad., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 142–150, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1002/tia2.20067.[7] B. K. Jesiek, L. K. Newswander, and M. Borrego, “Engineering education research: Discipline, community, or field?,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 39–52, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01004.x.