,” one might think there is less reason for civil engineers to be involved in study abroad programs. However, many of the largest and most innovative designs for such structures are now in the Middle East and Asia. Our programs in CEE first started with a unique program whereby students took a class in the design of skyscrapers and analyzed the design of a building they would visit. They then toured the actual structure and in some cases met the designers. This program expanded to include traffic issues in major cities such as Beijing. These programs were supplemented with water resource programs offered in Latin America. As a result, about 70% our graduating CEE students have a study abroad
Engineering: Testing, quality, assurance, and quantifiable improvement. NJ: Wiley.[12] Sommerville, I. (2011). Software engineering 9th Edition. ISBN-10, 137035152[13] Chemuturi, M.: Mastering Software Quality Assurance: Best Practices, Tools and Techniques for Software Developers. J. Ross Publication Inc. (2010) ISBN: 978- 1604270327[14] Tenbergen, B., Daun, M.: Industry Projects in Requirements Engineering Education: Application in a University Course in the US and Comparison with Germany. Proc. 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 2019. DOI: 10.24251/HICSS.2019.925.[15] Daun, M., Salmon, A., Tenbergen, B., Weyer, T., Pohl, K.: Industrial case studies in graduate requirements engineering
. The Evaluation Consortiumserves as a training practicum site for graduate students in the field of program evaluation and isactive in the design and implementation of innovative evaluation methodologies at the regional,national and international level.The assessment team is focusing on identifying intermediate success, programmatic weaknessand areas in need of modification or alteration as the TabLab materials, projects, and relatedprograms are developed, implemented and fully tested. Summative evaluation is focusing onshort-term and long-term learning, transfer of knowledge to other courses, and transfer of abilityto use the instrumentation across content. Data is being collected from students, faculty, studentsand other educators using the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dr. Johnson’s research focuses on design tools; specifi- cally, the cost modeling and analysis of product development and manufacturing systems; computer-aided design methodology; and engineering education.Dr. Bugrahan Yalvac, Texas A&M University Bugrahan Yalvac is an associate professor of science and engineering education in the Department of Teaching, Learning, and Culture at Texas A&M University, College Station. He received his Ph.D. in science education at the Pennsylvania State University in 2005. Prior to his current position, he worked as a learning scientist for the VaNTH Engineering Research Center at Northwestern University for three years. Yalvac’s research is in
studies we have continued to improvelearning effectiveness through changes in the computer agent design27. Important innovationsinclude offering students control over the timing of feedback16, using social strategies motivatedby the field of collaborative group work1, 10, and developing agents that demonstrate alignmentwith student goals17.The underlying thesis of this research is that offering a dynamic self-paced learning environmentfor student use outside of the lecture room is the best practical means for integratingsophisticated design and analysis experiences into undergraduate engineering curricula.Furthermore, the machine-monitored internet chat-based tutorial environment we use to achievethis goal offers an excellent opportunity for
authors cited their affiliation as the Center for Research inApplied Phrenology; the acronym CRAP, a dead giveaway, was apparently overlooked by themanuscript editor. To their delight, a few weeks later they received a notice of acceptance, basedon a rigorous peer review process, and a bill for $800, with directions to send payment to a postoffice box in the United Arab Emirates.2The incident created a whirlwind of commentary in the blogosphere and is but one of severalrecent, deliberate hoaxes aimed at online journals, particularly open access (also dubbed“predatory”) journals. But it also raises important questions in regards to the integrity ofpublished research in STEM-related fields and the ethics of editors and publishers who resort tolying
in Nigeria” was awarded the best DEI paper in the International Division of ASEE at the 2023 Conference. He is the Founding President of the African Engineering Education Fellows in the Diaspora, a non-governmental organization that leverages the experiences of African scholars in engineering education to inform and support engineering education policy, practice, and pedagogies in Africa. His research revolves around the professional development of STEM educators and researchers in low-resource contexts for which he employs culturally relevant pedagogy and the contextualization and validation of measurement instruments with a keen interest in sub-Saharan Africa.Tierney Harvey, University of OklahomaHaley Taffe
, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM). She served the NSF ADVANCE grant initiatives as a co-Principal Investigator, working to improve practices to recruit and retain women of color in STEM and enhance institutional climate at USD. Other current research grants support pathways for veterans in higher edu- cation, and the NSF program called, ”Revolutionizing Engineering & Computer Science Departments.” Her co-authored books include The Borderlands of Education (with Susan Lord), Mentoring Faculty of Color, and Beginning a Career in Academia: A Guide for Graduate Students of Color. She is past-Vice President (2017) of the Pacific Sociological Association, and an appointed consultant to the American Sociological
Paper ID #43897Board 128: Work in Progress: Toward a Common Sci Comm StrategyMr. Mark Blaine, University of Oregon Mark Blaine is a professor of practice who works at the intersection of storytelling and science, producing stories, developing experiential courses, and training scientists with audience analysis, strategic communication, and storytelling tools. He also works with media researchers to translate their work to best practices in science communication for journalists and strategic communications teams. At the Knight Campus, he has designed a novel, holistic approach to training scientists that seeks to
Chemical Engineering. He is a registered Professional Engineer in Tennessee. He has nineteen years of industrial experience in industrial process and product development in the detergent, paper, and packaging industries. He teaches capstone design, value engineering and engineering economy at the undergraduate level, and technical innovation and advanced engineering economy in the graduate Engineering Management program. His research interests include product development, technical innovation, entrepreneurship, and design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 A Comprehensive Approach to Power Sector Workforce DevelopmentAbstractThe University
Paper ID #40799From De Facto To De Jure and Beyond. It’s More Than Just Weather. WhatThe ”Chilly” Climate Really Feels Like for Black Doctoral Students inSTEMDreama Heaven Rhodes, Arizona State UniversityMotahareh Darvishpour Ahandani, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus I am Motahareh Darvishpour Ahandani, and I am currently pursuing my Ph.D. in Engineering Education System and Design at Arizona State University. I serve as a Research Assistant and bring with me six years of industry experience as a woman engineer. My research interests revolve around the mental health of international engineering graduate
international research team, I had the opportunity to work with senior leaders at Nazerbayev Univer- sity, KIMEP University and Kasipkor, a holding company establishing 2 new colleges (Astana) and 4 interregional centers (Atyrau, Ust-Kamenogorsk, Ekibstuz and Shymkent). My research team Technical Vocational Education Training (TVET) focused on examining the technical education system that is seen as a catalyst for the country’s ambition to be an international leader in the emerging green economy. My doctoral research explores the similarities and differences of physical and virtual place making, and the extent to which the approach may impact the learning experience for students and/or the shape of online learning spaces in
/10.7771/1541- 5015.141012. Pedersen, S. and Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. Educational Technology Research & Development, 51(2), 57–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF0250452613. Watson, W. R. and Fang, J. (2012). PBL as a framework for implementing video games in the classroom. International Journal of Game-Based Learning, 2(1), 77–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijgbl.201201010514. Ash, K. (2012). Educators evaluate ‘flipped classrooms. Education Week, 32(2), s6–s8.15. Bell, F. (2011). Connectivism: Its place in theory-informed research and innovation in technology-enabled learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning
anticipation of the actualdevelopment of new programs for either undergraduate or graduate students, a pilot course inrenewable energies was conducted during the summer of 2021. The course was offered forjunior/senior undergraduate students and had a broad presentation of renewable energies,theories, and practices associated with each. For this pilot course, a series of invited speakerlectures were offered. Experts in the field covered technical aspects of solar, wind, andbioenergy, as well as business, legislative and geopolitical aspects. Students taking the courseparticipated in an end-of-semester survey about their perception of renewable energies, theassociated industries, and their interest in pursuing jobs related to them. This paper will
Genevieve Gierke is graduating from Michigan Technological University in April 2012 with a bachelor’s degree in biomedical engineering and a certificate in Global Technological Leadership from the Pavlis Institute for Global Technological Leadership. She is currently researching polymeric coatings for im- plantable devices through controlled release of nitric oxide at Michigan Tech.Ms. Mary Raber, Michigan Technological University Mary Raber currently serves as Associate Director for the Institute for Leadership and Innovation and Director of the Enterprise Program at Michigan Technological University. She has overseen the imple- mentation and growth of the Enterprise Program at Michigan Tech since its inception in 2000, and
. Teachers College Press.13. Jones, G. (2002). Cyber schools: an educational renaissance. New York, NY: ibooks.14. Kenney, J. & Newcombe, E. (2011). Adopting a blended learning approach: challenges encountered and lessons learned in an action research study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15:1.15. Leonard, D.A., & DeLacey, B.J. (2002). Designing hybrid online/in-class learning programs for adults. Harvard Business School.16. Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11:1, 27-42.17. Loendorf, W. R. (2004). A course investigating technology in world
the institution, allowing for athorough understanding of their existing academic offerings. Our Graduate Research Assistantcollaborates with the various academic representatives to design a program that integrates theirinstitution’s offerings into the statewide ecosystem.As part of this collaborative effort, a preliminary course equivalency assessment is conducted.This involves an examination and comparison of the courses already established at theinstitutions. This initial evaluation allows us to identify potential areas of alignment and establishthe groundwork for the integration of those courses into the program.Through these engagements, we not only provide valuable insights into the benefits of optinginto the program but also actively
instructional change. Bonwell and Eison [9] list issues such asmaintaining faculty-student interaction in large classrooms, increased pre-class preparation, anda difficulty in covering all required course content within limited class time as a few of thesemajor obstacles preventing active-learning from achieving widespread use. Faculty egos andlimited incentives to change also discourage new practices, especially when the course is sharedamong multiple instructors. For these reasons, an optional recitation course offered outside of thetraditional class structure would be the best choice for ease of implementation that does notaffect other professors and their unique teaching styles. A single instructor could create asupplemental course with innovative
-boats on board for the number of passengers and crew? Did the TITANIC’s owners? Why or why not? 2. Would your answer change if you found out (hypothetically) that the TITANIC’s owners pressured the British Board of Trade’s decision not to increase the number of lifeboats? 3. How do you think that the belief that the TITANIC was unsinkable (i.e., the engineers had designed the ship as safe as the technology allowed) impact this ethical responsibility? 4. How would you convince your boss of the need to exceed the legal requirements for a design – especially if there were substantial costs associated with the redesign? 5. This is a case where the code of ethics forces the engineer to “overdesign
University.Norman Fortenberry, National Academy of Engineering Norman Fortenberry is the founding director of the Center for the Advancement of Scholarship on Engineering Education (CASEE) at the National Academy of Engineering. CASEE is a collaborative effort dedicated to achieving excellence in engineering education--education that is effective, engaged, and efficient. CASEE pursues this goal by promoting research on, innovation in, and diffusion of effective models of engineering education. Page 13.499.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Engineering and the Media: Building a New
instructional designers andprofessors for suggestions on course design. Therefore, a study examining the effect on studentperformance related to course design is well supported by the literature [12], [14], [16].A. Specific Aims / Research Questions:This analysis is centered in the following four research questions: 1. Is there a difference in student performance, between students in online courses vs. students in remote and face-to-face delivery modes? 2. Is there a difference in student performance, between students in courses influenced by deliberate instructional design processes vs. students in courses not influenced by deliberate instructional design process? 3. How do the students perceive their
going to have a substantial mechanical design component, to take a CAD course Page 14.1101.12for their technical elective.Results of Integration and ConclusionOver the past five years, the Electronics and Telecommunications faculty have moved the focusof their programs towards product/system development. While the Programs will always delivera well-rounded curriculum that prepares students for general careers in the Electronics andTelecommunication industries, the faculty believes that the future of engineering and engineeringtechnology in the United States depends on graduates that understand innovation andentrepreneurship as well as the
and attitudestowards uncertainty and robust decision making for climate change adaptation and riskmanagement.The first author of this paper is a PhD student, an EED member, and would like to self-nominatethis paper for the best student paper award. Thank you for your consideration.Key words:climate change adaptation, robust decision making, game-based learning, innovative pedagogy,uncertainty, risk1.0 Introduction1.1 Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) Problems can be defined as deeply uncertain when impact analysts cannot agree on theconceptual models that could be used to represent probable futures, the probability distributionsrepresenting uncertainty of parameters in the future, and/or how to value the different outcomes[1
, 2004. Coal: A Human History. Penguin Books.7. Jacobs, Jane. The Economy of Cities (1969) or The Nature of Economies (2001), both from Vintage Press8. Lau, Andrew (2010) "Sustainable Design: A New Paradigm for Engineering Education" in International Journal for Engineering Education, 26(2) 252-2599. Lau, Andrew S. (2004) "Life-centered Design - A Paradigm for Engineering in the 21st Century" ASEE 200410. Lau, Andrew S. (2010) A Philosophy of Sustainability for the 21st century. In Materials Research Insittute, PSU, Summer 2009.11. Lubchenco, Jane (1998) "Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science" Science 279(23 January) 491-49712. McConville, J.R., and J.R. Mihelcic, “Adapting Life Cycle Thinking
requires a focused integration of economics, cultural understandingand market dynamics, with technology. It also requires the facilities to reduce theory to field testsof practical devices usable by anyone in the world.The original motivation for this came from opportunities identified at the interface betweenSpace technology and Renewable Energy technology. However it was quickly seen that there areequally great challenges in the areas of understanding social and economic realities at thecustomer level in various nations, in public policy related to energy and climate change, inadopting innovations across disciplines within and outside science and engineering, and inaesthetics, public relations, and business models. Thus the course has to be
(and throughout the world) could be helpful albeitwithout sacrificing technical degree requirements. As a result, inclusion of arts within thecurriculum may aid in counteracting the reduced enrollment trend and broaden participation inengineering [10], [11]. Studies indicate arts inclusion directly impacts recruitment and retentionof females and underrepresented minorities [11]. Without changes to current higher educationengineering curricula, the lackluster innovation trend in many global economies is likely tocontinue. Unfortunately, limited literature exists that showcases best practices for integratinginnovation and entrepreneurship into mid-level engineering coursework from a STEAMperspective.1.2 Current Approaches and Associated
University. She earned her M.S., and Ph.D. from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. She teaches thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, engineering laboratory, and senior design studio courses. Her research interests include engineering education and targeted drug delivery. In 2022, she was awarded the ASME Best Teacher Award and earned the ACUE Certificate in Effective College Instruction. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Comparative Study on the Role of Bloom’s Taxonomy-based Assignments and Project-based Learning on Student Performance in an Undergraduate Fluid Mechanics CourseAbstractThis paper compares and evaluates the role of two group-based active learning
incentives to change also discourage new practices, especially when the course is sharedamong multiple instructors. For these reasons, an optional recitation course offered outside of thetraditional class structure would be the best choice for ease of implementation that does notaffect other professors and their unique teaching styles. A single instructor could create asupplemental course with innovative teaching methods that does not force other faculty membersto practice new methods, spend more time prepping, or revising course outcomes. Recitation isalso easily testable to determine efficacy without potentially harming students who learn bestthrough traditional methods. A recent study by Gannon University has shown that although asimilar
within this particularpopulation.While on-site in Honduras, the students were integrated into the Montaña de Luz community.They spent the week primarily at the MdL center, eating most of their meals as well as sleepingthere. They implemented their group projects, spent time with children, took a field trip to a localcigar factory and a national park with a well-known waterfall, and visited the local university.Some students also visited a local K-12 school. Three faculty members facilitated the activitieson-site and were fully embedded in all activities.2. Research MethodA convergent mixed methods design, shown in Figure 1, was used within the pilot study. Thisdesign was selected for its effectiveness in developing a holistic understanding by
persistence in the major or their intentions to stay in the profession post-graduation.9,10Much of this research has focused, moreover, on how the culture, climate, and professionalsocialization itself push women out of the field.7,11,12 In this article, we turn this question on itshead and ask: how do women conceptualize their token, or deviant, status as engineeringstudents? In asking this question we contribute a new perspective for understanding how womenconstruct rationales for persistence and exit.Women‟s tokenism in engineering education is structurally and culturally organized.Structurally, women remain a numerically small proportion of their classmates at most majorinstitutions of engineering education. Culturally, engineering education