Academy Major Todd Mainwaring is a junior rotating faculty member. Todd is a 2007 graduate of the United States Military Academy. He has earned two Masters of Science from Stanford University: one in Civil Engineering (Sustainable Design and Construction) and another in Management Science. His areas of interest include energy efficient building design, industrialized construction and life cycle assessment. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Monitoring and Controlling a Construction Project in the ClassroomThe planning phase of construction is relatively easy to implement in a classroom setting.Exercises that demonstrate and assess estimating and scheduling techniques are
, considering the same cohort of students, how did they perform on the projectthe second time in steel design compared to the first time in reinforced concrete design? Third,the students’ knowledge on basic structural analysis and plan reading was measured at thebeginning and end of each course. What level of knowledge did they have when entering therespective course? Were students’ perceptions of their knowledge gains during the coursessupported by assessed knowledge gains? Student design project grades and pre- and post-surveys were used to answer the researchquestions. Students completing the project for the first time in steel design had slightly highergrades than those completing the project the first time in reinforced concrete design
revisited forspecific course projects in the Civil and Environmental Engineering curriculum. The commoncourse project platform was introduced in the freshman surveying course, where studentscollected geographical data. This project platform was revisited throughout the freshman yearthrough the development of site plans and topographic maps of the project site in graphicalcommunications and geographical information systems courses. This method provides afoundational context for a civil engineering site development that will be used in future coursesfor designing a multi-story building in a structural design course, analyzing soil samples forfoundation design in a soil mechanics course, and developing a stormwater management plan ina water resources
for Individual Terms of a Sawtooth Forcing FunctionAdding a summation to the equation in Figure 10 gives Figure 11, which was used to createFigure 8.Figure 11: Equation for the Fourier Series Representation of a Sawtooth Forcing FunctionSummaryThe examples presented in this paper only scratch the surface of what an instructor can do withlive math in the classroom. In addition to having a plan for changing some parameters in asystematic fashion as part of a lesson, the instructor can use Mathcad to make changes that werenot planned, spurred by a suggestion or a question from the class, or an idea that occurs to theauthor during their explanation of the planned presentation.Using live math in the classroom works in any class where an instructor
is also known as visual-spatial skills and these are different from other forms ofintelligence such as verbal ability, reasoning ability, and memory skills. Spatial skills are linkedto professional and academic success [3], [4]. For example, when designing or constructing apumping station or piping systems within a treatment plant, it is always challenging to develop athree-dimensional mental picture of the space when looking at plan view and section views of aspace. Those who are skilled in developing that clear mental picture make fewer mistakes andare more efficient designers or constructors. Spatial training has been shown to have a strongimpact on developing these visual-spatial skills as measured by success on standardized
and plan for future events [3].Risk management and resilience are critical for planning, design, operation and maintenance of avariety of engineering systems for the built environment in the United States, including buildings,transportation, energy, water and food systems. For example, one of the prime lessons fromHurricane Sandy in 2012 was that we should design resilient infrastructure systems to ensure theadaptability for the future [4]. Currently, the importance of risk and resilience of engineeringsystems is increasingly appreciated in professional practice and research, yet these conceptscontinue to be absent from most traditional engineering curricula. Recent disasters and extremeevents have further highlighted the need to produce
student was required to evaluate the proposed design and plan to meet at least one of theUN Sustainable Development Goals. This resulted in each design team working to address atleast one of these goals. These goals will be incorporated into the proposed design which willalso consider the Envision rating system. Students expanded their focus beyond the design toconsider the overall plan, construction, maintenance and life cycle of the project. Theincorporation of both criteria helped to guide student decisions, evaluate the environmentalimpact of their designs and address the benefits the proposed design had on their respectivecommunities. Students were encouraged to be creative and think outside of the box whendeveloping their design
all possible fronts. In response to the newest body of knowledge, the RTBCommittee is preparing an action plan to do just that.This paper summarizes the changes made to the CE-BOK between the 2nd and 3rd editions andexplains how the CE-BOK is and always has been the foundation of ASCE’s RTB effort. It willexplore how ASCE has historically used the CE-BOK as a catalyst to influence change in theprofessional preparation of civil engineers, and how it may be used in the future. Potentialhurdles to implementation will be shared, particularly considering significant changes that havebeen made. For example, CE-BOK3 has added an affective domain to some of its traditionalcognitive outcomes, which no doubt will present a challenge for implementation
at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Kyle’s primary teaching duties include courses in geotechnical engineering and construction materials. His research interests include behavior and monitoring of in-place foundations and retaining structures. In addition to his teaching and research duties, Kyle is involved in geotechnical consulting and Engineers Without Borders.Dr. Matthew D. Lovell, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Matthew Lovell is an Associate Professor in the Civil Engineering Department at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, and he currently serves as the Interim Senior Director of Institutional Research, Plan- ning, and Assessment office. He is also serving as the director of the Making Academic
value beliefs better predict plans to continue into an engineering career. Afterthe first year of engineering school, both expectancy and value beliefs decreased. The decreasein expectancy belief was expected since during the first year of college, students are transitioningfrom high school to harder college-level courses. The decrease in value belief was not easy toexplain. The paper notes (bold added): “What is more difficult to explain, however, is the finding that at the end of the year, students reported enjoying engineering less and viewed it as less important and useful than they did at the beginning of the year. One explanation may be that freshmen are idealistic at the beginning of their college careers and that
develop an updated CEBOK, the Second Edition ofthe Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge (CEBOK2), which was published in 2008. In thesubsequent years, ASCE developed a plan for the long-term management of CEBOK on aneight-year cycle which led to the formation of the CEBOK3TC which began work in October2016. This paper concludes with a discussion on the update from CEBOK2 to CEBOK3.Why is this historical review and summary important to the civil engineering profession? Tomaintain the momentum of the educational and professional reform activities initiated by ASCEin the mid-1990’s (called the Raise the Bar Initiative), the successful processes of the past andthe associated “lessons learned” must be clearly communicated to future leaders and
Plan from 2009-2014, and Chair of the American Public Health Association’s Physical Activity Section from 2015-2016. Dr. Bornstein currently serves on several national committees including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Committee on Physical Activity Communications, the American Heart Association’s Expert Advisory Group on Physical Education and Physical Activity Policy in Schools, and he’s currently Chair of the National Physical Activity Plan’s Communications Committee. Locally, Dr. Bornstein is a member of the Mayor’s Health and Wellness Committee for the City of Charleston, and he is Chair of The Citadel’s Fitness Pillar.Mr. John H. Lewis Jr, The Citadel John Lewis has worked at the OECD
Students for Humanity (SESH) which assists with post-earthquake recovery in developing nations. In addition, she has previously been engaged in Cal Poly’s Society of Women Engineers colle- giate chapter as a leader and as an advocate for women in STEM to elementary school, middle school, and high school students in California. After graduation, she plans to pursue a masters degree in structural engineering to further her understanding of the interaction between architecture, structures, and construc- tion.Mr. Mark William Wright LEED Green Associate, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo Mark Wright is an undergraduate architectural engineering student at California Polytechnic State Uni- versity, San
ensure that all students attain marketable skills as part of theirhigher education. 60x30TX is a statewide plan developed by the THECB to enhance theworkforce of the state through higher education. As stated in the introduction to the plan: “Texas has become increasingly engaged in a global economy dependent on skilled and knowledgeable workers. Most of those workers come from higher education. Although Texas is improving at increasing college completions for students from groups that traditionally have not earned certificates or degrees in large numbers, the state has not improved quickly or broadly enough to keep up with the changes in demographics. Completions in Higher education must
scaled test.This study required the students to utilize engineering knowledge and practices to design andconstruct the tower using easily accessible materials and tools. The tower was constructed perthe 2018 Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI) Seismic Design Competition rulesand guidelines defining the design details and the two ground motions applied. As the studentsdid not plan to enter into the EERI SDC, they designed beyond the guideline restrictions to testthe use of seismic isolators. The tower was experimentally tested using the Shake Table II byQuanser available at SFSU with and without isolators. This project built upon the students’background in structural analysis, design, and mechanical vibrations. However, their
availability of time which led to the creation of Project Days, in whichthe students would work on their project individually with the instructor present so that promptfeedback could be given on their designs. The extensive planning necessary to flip a classroommeans that a detailed schedule of topics is typically available to the students at the outset of thecourse. That detailed schedule proves invaluable when students plan how to best work on theproject. One drawback of problem-based learning is that students report spending more timeworking on the course [19] which increases the time requirements on an already crowded studentschedule. However, this is offset by the use of the flipped format as students spend approximately20 % less time outside of
Foundation Design Environmental Environmental Engineering Environmental Engineering Engineering Water/Wastewater Treatment Water/Wastewater Treatment Transportation Transportation Engineering Transportation Engineering and/or Engineering Highway Design Planning Traffic Design Highway Design Transportation Planning and Management Traffic Design Water Resources Water Resources Engineering Water Resources Engineering Engineering Hydraulics Hydraulics and/or Hydrology Hydrology Construction Construction
Engineers (ASCE) serves as the Lead Society for the Civil Engineering ProgramCriteria [1]. The EAC/ABET General Criteria and the Civil Engineering Program Criteria definethe minimum requirements for accreditation of Civil Engineering programs.ASCE’s Committee on Accreditation (COA) has adopted an eight year cycle for reviewing andrevising the civil engineering program criteria. The plan for long term management of change wasdiscussed by Ressler and Lynch [2]. To initiate the cycle, the ASCE Committee on Education(COE) assembled a Task Committee to review the current Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge(BOK) and to determine if revisions are needed. The BOK defines the knowledge, skills, andattitudes necessary for entry into the practice of civil
information, although in sophomore and junior level courses students wereencouraged to take the survey with an opportunity to earn bonus points, while the students in thesenior level course volunteered to take the survey without bonus points.Table 1. Survey questions related to high-impact learning activities Student (high‐impact learning) Related Questions What is your definition or understanding of a high‐quality learning activity (something that you do to learn)? What is your definition or understanding of a high‐quality learning strategy (something that you plan and execute)? Do you have any examples other than this that you would like to suggest as a high‐impact learning activity or strategy? As you answer the
sought to identify what features if any were consistent throughout all thedocuments. The features identified in the summaries from the semesters of the interventionwere used to review the summaries from the previous year(s). Once the structural features ofthe summaries were identified, one of the second authors read the summaries looking for thesame structural elements to confirm the structural patterns. Then the board comments/scores were also collected for the semesters used to identifyany patterns of improvement. This strategy did not work out as planned due to a few anomaliesinvolved in the semesters included in the study. There was no clear evidence of improvementbetween the semesters studied. As a result, word counts of the
.[16] M. Krishnamurthy, D.A. Pezza, K.J. Fridley, D.B. Hains, “The Practitioners’ Point of View of the ASCE Body of Knowledge.” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. Salt Lake City UT, June 23-26, 2018. https://peer.asee.org/31120.[17] S.J. Ressler and D.R. Lynch. “The Civil Engineering Body of Knowledge and Accreditation Criteria: A Plan for Long-term Management of Change.” American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. Vancouver BC, June 26-29, 2011. https://peer.asee.org/18392.[18] ABET. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs, 2019 – 2020. 2019. ABET, Inc., Baltimore, MD: 2019
incorporateelements of this learning into our own courses so they hear about the value of this from civil andenvironmental engineers. We have several plans for improving our learning in these areas andare confident our efforts will be fruitful. We think the valuing of the humanities and socialsciences is broader than just a civil engineering or even an engineering focus. We are educatingfuture leaders and feel their effectiveness in society extends beyond framing things within anengineering or civil engineering context. In fact, we are concerned this may be to their detrimentand are still discussing our priorities in these areas.Alabama. We struggle with addressing the relationship of humanities to the practice ofengineering. We do this fairly effectively in
and areas for improvement. ExCEEd Teaching Workshop SeminarsI Learning to Teach: Justifies importance of formally learning to teach and introduces a model instructional strategy that will be a road map for the ETW.II Principles of Effective Teaching and Learning: Introduces Lowman’s3 two-dimensional model of teaching and provides a compendium of learning principles.III Introduction to Learning Styles: Examines Felder’s Learning Style Dimensions4 and discusses how to accommodate all styles of learners.IV Learning Objectives: Introduces Bloom’s taxonomy5 of educational objectives and shows how to write appropriate and useful learning objectives.V Planning a Class
these skills in a specific context. By applying teamwork and leadership skills in thesolution of civil engineering problems, civil engineers must then establish goals, plan tasks, andmeet objectives, thereby achieving the ABET General Criterion 3(5). The greatest gap, althoughstill considered minor, exists between the CEBOK3 and the CEPC. The CEPC only requirescivil engineers to explain the basic concepts of leadership, which is cognitively below the abilityto apply leadership, and does not include diversity and inclusion. The CEBOK3 also includesthe affective domain, which requires the civil engineer to demonstrate the skills to internalize orvalue the human experience. The authors’ opinion is that although important in a civilengineer’s
onmember design and the use of the design aides within the AISC Manual. While the majority ofthe examples were instructor lead, almost all lectures required students to assist in findingsolutions using the think-pair-share (TPS) collaborative learning strategy, in which students thinkindividually and share their ideas with classmates. TPS examples are a powerful learning tooland help student identify areas of weakness if they struggle while attempting to solve a problem.Since TPS examples can take more time to execute, they could be more easily and regularlyincluded within a flipped classroom model. Finally, if all of the examples planned for a lecturewere completed, lecture occasionally ended early to acknowledge and reward students for
the guidelines of the directions or approaches directions or follows through on assignment without going beyond approaches to the untested and potentially the guidelines of the assignment in the risky approaches to the assignment final product assignment in final product Solving Only a single Considers and rejects Having selected Develops logical consistent problems approach considered less acceptable among alternatives, plan to solve problem, and used to solve the approaches to solving develops a logical recognizing
) have never been mentioned N- Repeat what has already been said Like you have pointed out, there are things that are beyond our without any further exploration control but still, plan can be made for those too. (G1 W13) Outside OE+ Draw on personal experience Since my father is a contractor, I have seen him placing bids knowledge for the project which is within his capacity and not beyond the limit (G2 W 3) OC+ Critique/interpret/ cite course materials Like stated in the article, the codes typically exist for
rating system is endorsed by ASCE, American Public Works Association(APWA), and American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC), and is being used byinfrastructure professionals to design, plan, build, and maintain sustainable infrastructure. Themetric is comprised of sustainability credits in five categories: quality of life, leadership,resource allocation, natural world, and climate and resilience. Credit areas have variable points,levels of achievement, and a list of documentation needed to achieve each level. The levels ofachievement range from “improved” to “restorative”, and projects may gain extra “innovation”points for exceeding the credit requirements. After the Envision checklist is complete for aproject, the project is evaluated by
. Davis P.E., The Citadel William J. Davis is Dept. Head & D. Graham Copeland Professor of Civil Engineering and Director of Construction Engineering at The Citadel in Charleston, SC. His academic experience includes: transporta- tion infrastructure planning and design, infrastructure resilience, traffic operations, highway safety, and geographic information systems. His research interests include: constructing spatial databases for bet- ter management of transportation infrastructure, improving transportation design, operation, safety and construction, understanding long-term effects of urban development patterns, and advancing active living within the built environment for improved public health. He teaches
surveyed in this study and in the literature,increased exposure to material, the ability to start and stop a video that is available for reviewanytime, the ability to work additional problems, the ability to take responsibility for the learningand work with peers, and the ability to directly engage with the instructor in a group settingimproves the learning environment. However, it is important to carefully plan and execute theeffort. To accomplish this, it is critical that the pre-lecture technology, in-class activities, and theinstructor are effective and able to keep the students engaged.Research DesignThis study investigates the impacts of a Partially Flipped Classroom (PFC) instructional model ina junior level geotechnical engineering course