Conference Session

STEM Pipeline: Pre-College to Post-Baccalaureate

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Julie Trenor, University of Houston; Olga Pierrakos, James Madison University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

discussion with graduate students andfaculty as an informative experience in addition to their daily access to mentors: Page 13.1372.7 “Well, there was one of our events that we do every Wednesday [in the REU program]… one of them was having a panel of people who were going for or had Ph.D.’s and they talked to us about benefits of a Ph.D. It definitely threw a kink into my plans; made me consider graduate school a little bit more. So, yeah, it gave me pause and [caused me to] think a little harder about everything.” 1. Past Performance AccomplishmentsThe REU experience served as a positive performance

Conference Session

Choice and Persistence in Engineering Education and Careers

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado Boulder; Jacquelyn F. Sullivan, University of Colorado Boulder

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

importance of the following variables in the decision for admission to your engineering degree program(s). Data from 49 respondents representing 42 U.S. institutions in 25 states plus DC. Important and Neither Not at all Extremely Important nor Important and Top 22 Admission Criteria Important Unimportant Unimportant n % n % n % High school grade point average (GPA) 41 91% 3 7% 1 2% ACT or SAT Math 41 89% 2 4% 3

Conference Session

Identity and Culture

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tiago R. Forin, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Robin Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kristen Hatten, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Meisenbach, R. J. (2008). Working with tensions: Materiality, discourse, and (dis)empowerment in occupational identity negotiation among higher education fund-raisers. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 258-287.Norander, S., Mazer, J. P., & Bates, B. R. (2011). “D.O. or die:” Identity negotiation among osteopathic medical students. Health Communication, 26, 59-70.Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Page 25.371.21 Sage Publications.Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach

Conference Session

Persistence and Retention II: Curricular Issues

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Thomas F. Wolff, Michigan State University; Steven M. Cramer, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Barbara A. Masi, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

inEngineering Attritition.” Proceedings, 2006 ASEE Annual Conference, 2006, paper 2006-1336.[4] Ohland, M. W., Camacho, M., Layton, R., Long, R., Lord, S., and Wasburn, M., (2009). “How We MeasureSuccess Makes a Difference: Eight Semester Persistence and Graduation Rates for Female and Male EngineeringStudents.” Proceedings, 2009 ASEE Annual Conference, 2009, paper 2009-705.[5] Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N.M (1997). Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences.Boulder, CO, Westview Press.[6] Donaldson, K. M. and Sheppard, S.D., (2007). “Exploring the Not-So-Talked About Undergraduate Pathway:Migrating Into Engineering.” Proceedings for the International Conference on Research in Engineering Education,Honolulu, HI, 2007.[7] Mendez, G

Conference Session

Trends in Engineering Education 2

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Conrad Tucker, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathy Schmidt Jackson, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Linda C. Schmidt, University of Maryland, College Park; Gül E. Okudan Kremer, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Peifeng Yin

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

–232, June 2002[3]. Hanfmann, E. (1941). A Study of Personal Patterns in an Intellectual Performance. Character and Personality, 9, 315 – 325. Page 24.1215.15[4]. Klein, G. S. (1951). A Personal World through Perception. In R. R. Blake & G. V. Ramsey (Eds.), Perception: An Approach to Personality. New York: The Ronald Press Company.[5]. Witkin, H. A., Karp, S. A. and Goodenough, D.R. (1959). Dependence in Alcoholics. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, Vol. 20,493-504.[6]. Kagan, J. (1958). The Concept of Identification. Psychological Review, 65, 296 – 305.[7]. Kagan, J. (1966). The Generality and

Conference Session

Student Learning, Problem Solving, and Critical Thinking 1

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Claudia Elena Vergara, Michigan State University; Mark Urban-Lurain, Michigan State University; Jon Sticklen, Michigan State University; Abdol-Hossein Esfahanian, Michigan State University; Hannah McQuade, The Center for Engineering Education Research; Andrew League, Michigan State University; Chris John Bush, The Center for Engineering Education Research; Michael Cavanaugh, Michigan State University, Center for Engineering Education Research

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

National Science Foundation (NSF)under awards 722221 and 0939065. Any opinions, findings and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe NSF.References[1] Bernold, L. E., Spurlin, J. E., & Anson, C. M. (2007). Understanding our students: A longitudinal study ofsuccess and failure in engineering with implications for increased retention. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(3), 263-274.[2] Denning, P. J. (1992). Educating a new engineer. Communications of the ACM, 35 (12), 82-97.[3] Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2005). Integrated engineering curricula. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147-164.[4] National Research Council (Ed.). (2002

Conference Session

ERM Potpourri

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Denise Wilson, University of Washington; Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Mee Joo Kim, University of Washington- Seattle; Elizabeth Burpee; Rebecca A Bates, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Tamara Floyd Smith P.E., Tuskegee University; Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University; Nanette M Veilleux, Simmons College

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

which students tend toward at that particular institution.Bibliography 1. Pascarella, E.T. & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 2. Inman, P. & Pascarella, E. (1998). The impact of college residence on the development of critical thinking skills in college freshmen. Journal of College Student Development, 39(6):557-568. 3. Brint, S. & Cantwell, A.M. (2006). Undergraduate time use and academic outcomes: Results from the University of California undergraduate experience survey 2006. Teachers College Record

Conference Session

Studies of Shifting In-person Courses to Online and Students' Online Behavior

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Mohammed F. Farghally, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Mostafa Kamel Osman Mohammed, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Assiut University; Hamdy F. F. Mahmoud, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Assiut University; Margaret O'Neil Ellis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Derek A. Haqq, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Molly Rebecca Domino, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Brett D. Jones, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Clifford A. Shaffer, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

blended offerings. In Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Information technology education, pages 25–30, 2012. [5] Jill E Courte. Comparing student acceptance and performance of online activities to classroom activities. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education, pages 185–190, 2007. [6] Yong Zhao, Jing Lei, Bo Yan, Chun Lai, and Hueyshan Sophia Tan. What makes the difference? a practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8):1836, 2005. [7] Di Xu and Shanna S Jaggars. Performance gaps between online and face-to-face courses: Differences across types of students and academic subject areas. The Journal of Higher Education

Conference Session

Undergraduate Students' Professional Skills and Reflection

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Virginia Charter, Oklahoma State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

assessments (i.e., particularexam questions pass rate, written reports, etc.). The report may not consider the learning processstudents had during their course(s) or throughout their undergraduate program. In other words,assessment-centric self-study reports are not concerned with existing pedagogical practices anddata on how and why engineering students achieve the desired competencies of the requiredoutcomes. Given the emphasis of ABET on continuous improvement, it is surprising, andantithetical to commonly accepted quality assurance and continuous improvement processes, thatABET processes do not formally require student perceptions of their achievement of the studentoutcomes. Although employers and faculty are both recognized as

Conference Session

Preparing Engineering Students for Their Professional Practice

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Kanembe Shanachilubwa, Pennsylvania State University; Megan Ellery; Gabriella M. Sallai, Pennsylvania State University; Catherine G.P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Engineering Education Research Practices and Community

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Javeed Kittur, Arizona State University; Brooke Charae Coley, Arizona State University; Nadia N. Kellam, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Quantitative Research Methods

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel Briggs, North Carolina State University; Jessica Nicole Chestnut, North Carolina State University; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Cheryl Cass, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

heads and graduate program administrators of selectedengineering doctoral programs to assist with survey promotion and distribution. The largenumber of responses will provide our analysis with the statistical power to identify and measurethe significance of identity and motivational profiles of doctoral engineering students.AcknowledgementsThis work was funded by the National Science Foundation, grant # 1535254.References1. Ugwu, D.N., Adamuti-trache, M., 2017. Post-Graduation Plans of International Science and Engineering Doctoral Students Attending U . S . Universities 7, 1–21.2. Long-Chuan, L., Rose, G.M., Blodgett, J.G., 1999. The Effects of Cultural Dimensions on Ethical Decision Making in Marketing: An Exploratory Study. J. Bus

Conference Session

Understanding the Discipline of Engineering

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Tingerthal P.E., Northern Arizona University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

learning are ways of teaching that better connect the component parts of engineeringwork"8(p174). Sheppard et al. identify five key insights for rethinking the education of engineers:“Engineering work is inherently interactive and complex; Formulating problems and solvingproblems are interdependent activities; Engineering has many publics, Engineering incorporatesmany domains beyond the technical; Engineers affect the world.”8(p175) However, pockets ofinnovation suggest that transformation of engineering education is underway. In order tomeasure this transformation, it is important to benchmark the current practice, or 'signaturepedagogy', of engineering.Signature PedagogiesA signature pedagogy “organize[s] the fundamental ways in which future

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 8: Survey and Instrument Development

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Melissa G. Kuhn, Old Dominion University; Joanna K. Garner, Old Dominion University; Shanan Chappell, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineering, “STEM assessment tools: Retention surveys: Students leaving engineering,” 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/secured/director/retention/leaving.aspx. [Accessed: 10- Oct-2018].[5] Assessing Women and Men in Engineering, “STEM assessment tools: LAESE: Longitudinal assessment of engineering self-efficacy,” 2008. [Online]. Available: https://www.engr.psu.edu/awe/secured/director/diversity/efficacy.aspx. [Accessed: 10- Oct-2018].[6] F. S. Laanan, “Studying transfer students: Part 1: Instrument design and implications,” Community College Journal of Research and Practice, vol. 28 no. 4, pp. 331-351, Aug. 2010. [Online.] Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10668920490424050

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 22: Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hadi Ali, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus; Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Engineering Design. Retrieved April 2018, from Presentations from the 2nd Learning Innovation Showcase, Institute for the Science of Teaching & Learning, Arizona State University: https://istl.asu.edu/presentations/scaffolded-prototyping-activities-product-based- learning-engineering-designShulman, L. S. (1986). Those who can understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. W. (2009). How and When Does Complex Reasoning Occur? Empirically Driven Development of a Learning Progression Focused on Complex Reasoning about Biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 610–631.

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 17: Student Cognitive Development

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eunsil Lee, Arizona State University; Adam R. Carberry, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

, October, 2016.[4] J.E. Rhodes, “A theoretical model of youth mentoring,” in Handbook of Youth Mentoring, D.L. DuBois and M.J. Karcher, Ed. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Press, 2005, pp. 30-43.[5] C. Pfund, A. Byars-Winston, J. Branchaw, S. Hurtado, & K. Eagan, “Defining attributes and metrics of effective research mentoring relationships,” AIDS Behavior, vol. 20, pp. S238- S248, April, 2016.[6] P.A. Mabrouk, “Development and Implementation of an Effective Graduate Student Mentoring Program in Support of Undergraduate Research Experiences,” Perspectives on Undergraduate Research & Mentoring (PURM), October, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.elon.edu/purm/2017/10/26/development-and-implementation-of-an-effective

Conference Session

Using Technology to Enhance Education

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Chen, California Polytechnic State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Initiative, March 2006. Available on-line at http://www.educause.edu/7ThingsYouShouldKnowAboutSeries/7495, accessed Feb. 5, 2009. .2 EDUCAUSE, “7 Things You Should Know About… Lecture Capture,” EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative, December 2008. Available on-line at http://www.educause.edu/7ThingsYouShouldKnowAboutSeries/7495, accessed Feb. 5, 2009.3 http://www.apple.com/education/mobile-learning/, accessed Feb. 5, 2009.4 Hrastinski, S., “Asynchronous and Synchronous E-Learning,” EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), 2008.5 Russell, T.L., The No significant Difference Phenomenon, 5th ed. (Montgomery, AL: International Distance Education Certification Center), 2001.6 Felder, R.M., “A Longitudinal Study of Engineering Student Performance and

Conference Session

Student Learning

Collection

2009 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University-Great Valley; Pamela Vercellone-Smith, Penn State Great Valley; Sally Sue Richmond, Penn State Great Valley

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

Conference Session

Engineering Identity

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heather Perkins, North Carolina State University; Marissa A. Tsugawa-Nieves, University of Nevada, Reno; Jessica Nicole Chestnut, North Carolina State University; Blanca Miller, University of Nevada, Reno; Adam Kirn, University of Nevada, Reno; Cheryl Cass, North Carolina State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

physics. “When I was a kid my father took me to the physics lab…. Whenyou're a kid it ha[s] a great influence on you, because ... your dad just looked like an Einstein.”For Sean, being a good son was tied up in being a good teacher and a good engineer, as successin one indicates success in the others. He also drew on his experiences and identity as a non-native speaker when talking about his work teaching engineering, as demonstrated in thefollowing quote: “One of my students asked me, ‘Oh my god. I got a minus work, a negative work.’ ... Don't feel bad about the negative work…. This negative means that this is work out of your system, not into your system. For example, the pump work, and the rankine cycle is positive

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 2: The Study of Identity in Engineering Education

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Nicole P. Pitterson, Virginia Tech; Ashish Agrawal, University of Cape Town; Jennifer M. Case, Virginia Tech; Kevin Krost, Virginia Tech

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

. I guess I really wanted to do research, so I feel like this was the best school for that and I just felt like this would be the best pick for me - Kiran, U2, Biochem Out of all the other choices, I narrowed it down based on distance from the school, cause I'm a commuter. Then, the programs that I have. Back in high school, there's no question like if I'm going to college or not. I'm definitely going to college. So, U2's like my top two schools. Then, also, I love the programs with the scholarships available. - Soledad, U2, ChemEOne distinct finding that indicated a significant difference between institutions was the role ofundergraduate research experience which is very salient at U2. Students discussed

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 10: Understanding Student Experiences

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Behzad Beigpourian, Purdue University; Frank Luchini; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

scale, accounting for reverse-coded questions.Psychological safety uses seven-point Likert scale and conflict and cohesion are each five-point Likert scales. In addition to using Edmondson [3]’ seven-item questionnaire forpsychological safety, CATME includes Jehn and Mannix [15]’s questions for measuringconflict, and measures of cohesion from Carless and de Paola [16] and Loughry and Tosi[17]. In appendix A, we provided all questions and sub-questions collected by CATME andused in this study.ResultsIn this paper, we used simple linear regression to measure the relationship betweenpsychological safety and the perception of students about team outcomes (conflict andcohesiveness). We explored this relationship for individual and as a consensus

Conference Session

Maker Communities and Authentic Problem Solving

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christopher Rennick, University of Waterloo; Carol Hulls P.Eng., University of Waterloo; Derek Wright P.Eng., University of Waterloo; Andrew J. B. Milne, University of Waterloo, Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering; Eugene Li, University of Waterloo; Sanjeev Bedi P.Eng., University of Waterloo

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

W 2017 S 2017 ECE Design Days allowed me to integrate knowledge 91% 91% from across my ECE courses. (Likert) ECE Design Days was well-aligned with the content of 79% 83% my ECE courses. (Likert) I learned something new during ECE Design Days. 97% 91% (Likert) I enjoyed how the event became more and more open- 88% 82% ended. (Likert) Five years from now, I will likely recall ECE Design 89% 91% Days as being: (Positive/Negative) I think that future 1B students should participate in 98% 91% something like ECE Design Days. (Likert)Table 2 Anecdotal feedback on ECE Design Days Student comments I will remember being

Conference Session

Teaming & Collaborative Learning

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Tejasvi Parupudi, Purdue University; Sarah Knapp, Purdue University; Amelia Chesley, Purdue University; Nathan Mentzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Dawn Laux, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

learning communities, and courseintegration (Gardner, 2013; Smith, R. 2011; Wilcox, P., Winn, S., & Fyvie- Gauld, M. 2005;Tinto & Goodsell, 1994; Enke, 2011). These methods of managing and enhancing first-yearundergraduate experience have been well-researched and seem generally successful; however,large-scale partnered-teaching efforts that span more than one institutional department arerelatively uncommon in the context of large public research universities. At a large publicresearch university, a new Integrated First-Year Experience among 3 introductory freshmancourses—Introductory Composition, Fundamentals of Speech Communication, and DesignThinking in Technology, has been implemented. In total, the integration involved over 500 first

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Curricula and Pathways

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sarah E. Parikh, Foothill College; Lori Silverman, Foothill College

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

2014: Indianapolis, Indiana.9. Blash, L., et al., A Long & Leaky Pipeline: Improving Transfer Pathways for Engineering Students. 2012, The Research & Planning Group of California Community Colleges.10. Commission, C.P.E., California Postsecondary Education Commission to close doors on November 18. 2011, California Postsecondary Education Commission.11. Commission, C.P.E. Detailed Data. 2011; Available from: http://www.cpec.ca.gov/.12. Ulate, D., Discussion on Chancellor's Common Student ID Number, S. Parikh, Editor. 2016.

Conference Session

Faculty Development II: Building Community Among STEM Educators

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jana Bouwma-Gearhart, Oregon State University; Ann Sitomer, Oregon State University; Kathleen Quardokus Fisher, Oregon State University; Christina Smith, Oregon State University; Milo Koretsky, Oregon State University

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

that could account for constantly changing organization(s) partially due theircontinual re-organization around new goals making them ever more complex, open as a system, and thuspotentially influenced by, and influencing, an intervention (and other environment influences) in novel,unpredictable ways.We looked towards pertinent theory to help make research model decisions. A theory’s usefulness is two-fold, in particular when considering theories to study education interventions and associated change. Atheory must be able to illuminate phenomena of interest, that is, explain and predict. Yet it is also shouldbe practical, meaning potentially informing practice; in our case, this would equate to helping interventionleaders/change agents to

Conference Session

Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Scott Charles Streiner, University of Pittsburgh; Erin McCave, Clemson University; Svetlana V. Levonisova, University of Southern California; Rachel Elizabeth Savage; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California; Lisa Benson, Clemson University; Cheryl Matherly, The University of Tulsa; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

further actions. Reflection on experience was framed as an intentional and dialectical thinking process where a student revisited features of an experience and used one or more lenses in order to assign meaning(s) to the experience that guided future action.28 From this standpoint, reflection the students had before, during, and after the international experience were analyzed. Reflection that occurred during the interview itself did not qualify as ‘Reflection’, as the nature of the interview was to engage the students to reflect on their experiences. Thus coding this way would have been unnecessary and uninformative. 6. Inductive – refers to codes that emerged from out of the interview data, not included in the

Conference Session

Faculty Development II: Building Community Among STEM Educators

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Ken Yasuhara, University of Washington, Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

 engineering education-related awards, and  type(s) of contributions to the field.Ultimately, 47 people were interviewed, with an emphasis on pioneers who were near retirementor had already retired. Resources limited the number of pioneers who could be interviewed andprofiled. Further, not all invited pioneers were interested or able to participate. We acknowledgethat this is just a sample of the many people who have substantially contributed to engineeringeducation and hope that this work can be expanded to include more of them.Data analysisAll 47 interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Using qualitative analysis software(ATLAS.ti), the transcripts were coded for the contributions and impacts reported by thepioneers, drawing primarily on

Conference Session

Works in Progress: Innovation Through Propagation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia J. Finelli, University of Michigan; Jeffrey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University; Larry J. Shuman, University of Pittsburgh

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

remain, as do other questions about effective implementation strategies. Following thepattern of this work in progress, we offer two illustrative research questions:  How should the function of faculty development be addressed at different institutional levels, e.g., departmental, college, institutional, national, and international?  How are faculty engagement with and responses to formal faculty development initiatives characterized, and how might these characteristics, patterns, etc. inform future faculty development initiatives?Bibliographic Information1. Freeman, S., et al., Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, Proceedings of the National

Conference Session

ERM Technical Session 19: Thinking about the Engineering Curriculum

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eunhye Kim, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Nathan M. Hicks, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matilde Luz Sanchez-Pena, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

the MIDFIELD database,” Esource Coll. Transit. Newsl. Natl. Resour. Cent. First-Year Exp. Stud. Transit., vol. 7, no. 4, p. 4, Mar. 2010.[6] D. R. Krathwohl, “A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview,” Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 212–218, 2002.[7] B.S. Everitt, S. Landau, M. Leese, D. Stahl. Cluster Analysis, 5th Ed. Wiley & Sons, 2011.

Conference Session

Teaching Assistants, Supplemental Instruction, and Classroom Support

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Nathan L. Anderson, California State University, Chico

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Educational Research and Methods

data that could be of use wouldbe to test the various implementations with a different course instructor, and look for similarperformance differences. In conclusion, when some of principle problems associated withteaching and learning programming are analyzed, modified lecture with SI seems to offer somepositive initial results.References[1] D. Sleeman, “The challenges of teaching computer programming,” Communications of theACM, Vol. 29, No. 9, 1986.[2] S. Sentance and A. Csizmadia, “Computing in the curriculum: Challenges and strategies froma teacher’s perspective,” Educ. Inf. Technol., Vol. 22, pp.469-495, 2017.[3] M. Ben-Ari, “Constructivism in computer science education,” Proceedings of the twenty-ninth SIGCSE technical symposium on