design derived from the exercises.There are many ways of using class exercises in the classroom setting. For a small class size, theteacher may simply use an exercise to engage students in discussion and hands-on practice. Forlarger classes, the students can be assigned to small groups using the class exercise as aninstrument leading to group projects. Woods and Howard [12] effectively used class exercisesfor Information Technology students to study ethical issues. Day and Foley [13] used class timeexclusively for exercises, having their students prepare for class with materials provided online.Bishop and Verleger [14] presented a comprehensive survey of the research that revieweddifferent ways of using class exercises in the classroom, often
Culture; 444 Harrington Tower; College Station, TX 77843; Telephone: (+1) 979.8621713; e-mail:yalvac@tamu.eduLisa Brooks, Texas A&M University Lisa Brooks is a graduate student of Science Education at Texas A&M University. She holds an M.Ag. degree in Entomology from Texas A&M University and a B.S. degree in Animal Science from Rutgers University. She specializes in research focusing on the design of learning environment that support transfer of learning to practical situations. Address: Texas A&M University; Teaching, Learning, and Culture; 343 Harrington Tower; College Station, TX 77843; Telephone: (+1) 979.696.5034;e-mail: lisaabrooks@tamu.eduChristine Ehlig-Economides
teachingengineering design. The results also seem to indicate that these teaching qualities take severalyears to develop through the STOMP model. Complementary experiences, such as professionaldevelopment workshops, that are coupled with STOMP may accelerate these positive results.Further studies that investigate how to best prepare teachers for teaching engineering content inthe classroom will be an important accompaniment to this one. Further study of STOMP and itsimpact on student learning is also important for a more complete understanding of the program.Longitudinal data on STOMP and how individual teachers change over the course of theirenrollment in the program will also give a better idea of how the program impacts teachers.Bibliography1. Head, E
AC 2009-1678: HIGH SCHOOL TEACHERS ENGINEERING DESIGN LESSONPLANNING THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTCameron Denson, Utah State University Cameron Denson is a post doctoral research associate for the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education at Utah State University. He earned a Ph.D. in occupational studies from the University of Georgia. His research interests include diversity initiatives and increasing student self-efficacy in science and math through infusing engineering design into 9-12 technology education. Previously, he was a middle school technology educator in North Carolina, active in the community activism and grassroots initiatives.Nathan Mentzer, Utah State University
, having worked as a software engineer, project lead and manager before becoming Assistant Professor and Department Chair for Electrical Engineering at the Ateneo de Davao University.Dr. Holly M Matusovich, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Holly M. Matusovich is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. She is current the Assistant Department Head for Undergraduate Programs and the former Assistant Department Head for Graduate Programs in Virginia Tech’s Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and practice related to graduate student mentoring. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, was nominated for a Graduate
Grade for Program Assessment? October 2003http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/do-grades-make-the-grade.pdf Accessed1/2/16[19] Regan, P. J. (2010). Read Between the Lines; the Emancipatory Nature of FormativeAnnotative Feedback on Draft Assignments. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 23(6), 453–466. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-010-9168-2[20] Beare, P. G. (1986). The Contract--An Individualized Approach to Competency-BasedLearning and Evaluation. Proceedings of the annual conference of the international society ofIndividualized instruction, Atlanta Georgia.[21]Suslick, K. S. (2005). A non-coercive, menu driven grading scheme, 1–2. Journal ofChemical Education 62(5), p408-9.[22] Green, K. H., & Emerson, A. (2007). A new
, with an additional appointment in Ophthalmology. His primary teaching is in human and animal physiology. He is the Co-Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research and Associate Director of the Northwestern University Inderdepartmental Neuroscience Graduate Program. Formerly, he was the Associate Director of the VaNTH Engineering Research Center in Bioengineering Educational Technologies, and chair of the Biomedical Engineering Department at Northwestern. He is a fellow of the American Institute of Medical and Biological Engineering, the Biomedical Engineering Society, and the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology. His research interests are
received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Texas A&M University. His research interests in educational research include modeling student success, modeling student team functioning, and multi-disciplinary engineering education. His technical research interests include solid mechanics, experimental mechanics, nonlinear materials characterization, microstructural evaluation of materials, and experiment and instrument design. Page 11.1322.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 The Quality of Solutions to Open-Ended Problem Solving
AC 2010-1634: CONFLICT BEHAVIOR AND ITS INFLUENCE ONENGINEERING DESIGN TEAMSXaver Neumeyer, Northwestern UniversityAnn McKenna, Northwestern University Ann F. McKenna is the Director of Education Improvement in the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science at Northwestern University. She also holds a joint appointment as a Professor in the School of Education and Social Policy as well as a Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering and is the co-Director of the Northwestern Center for Engineering Education Research (NCEER). She received her BS and MS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Drexel University and Ph.D. in Science and Mathematics Education from the University of
teaching and learning, and reflection – with a goal of enhancing our collectiveunderstanding of this form of scholarship and the ways to use it in engineering education: ● The systems thinking example highlights an approach for connecting research to practice, which was developed based on a synthesis of design thinking literature, vehicle design literature, and studies of engineering practice. The result of this synthesis was a set of design principles that was used in the development of courses and lessons that prepare students to use systems thinking techniques within the design process. ● The innovation example unpacks the process of developing a framework of design for high- impact innovation
engineering coursework and the design process of undergraduate students in project-based courses.Dr. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Assistant Professor of Ed- ucation at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college-level en- gineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school experience, especially in under-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). http
practices. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 WIP: Undergraduate Research Experiences Survey (URES) and Engineering IdentityABSTRACT: In this work-in-progress paper, we discuss the development and preliminaryresults of a survey about undergraduate engineers’ participation in research outside of classes.We want to know how many students are involved in research, what they do, and what theythink they are learning. In particular, we are interested in what categories of students engagein research (year in college, major, race, gender, GPA, first-generation status, etc.), and howare they benefiting from it. We selected questions from the
AC 2009-1286: COMPARISON OF STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF VIRTUAL ANDPHYSICAL LABORATORIESMilo Koretsky, Oregon State University Milo Koretsky is an Associate Professor of Chemical Engineering at Oregon State University. He currently has research activity in areas related to thin film materials processing and engineering education. He is interested in integrating technology into effective educational practices and in promoting the use of higher level cognitive skills in engineering problem solving. Dr. Koretsky is a six-time Intel Faculty Fellow and has won awards for his work in engineering education at the university and national levels.Christine Kelly, Oregon State University Christine Kelly
18 years, and currently does both research and instructional development in engineering education. Jim has taught courses on the development of reflective teaching practices, and has presented workshops on learning how to learn and developing metacognitive awareness.Dr. Cynthia J. Atman, University of Washington Cynthia J. Atman is the founding director of the Center for Engineering Learning & Teaching (CELT), a professor in Human Centered Design & Engineering, and the inaugural holder of the Mitchell T. & Lella Blanche Bowie Endowed Chair at the University of Washington. She also directed the national NSF-funded Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE). Her research centers
” courses and in senior-level capstone design courses. Page 11.1149.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2006 Strategies for Assessing Course-Specific OutcomesAbstractA proven method for satisfying the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology(ABET) “Criterion 3” requirements is the formulation of outcomes specific to “core” courses in acurriculum, which are tied to the program outcomes. The challenges of assessing such course-specific outcomes are described in this paper, with a focus on practical realities and lessonslearned through seven trials in two different computer engineering courses spanning
: design and problem-solving skills, interdisciplinarycompetence, and contextual competence. The study is also examining institutional andeducational practices and programs that contribute to the success of women andunderrepresented minority students in engineering programs. In this paper, we focus exclusivelyon interdisciplinary competence. Site SelectionThe research team used a nationally representative dataset developed for the EngineeringChange study (Lattuca, Terenzini, & Volkwein, 2006)26, which assessed the impact of the Page 15.710.7implementation of ABET’s outcomes-based EC2000 accreditation criteria, to empirically selectsix case
citations per publication is mostly considerably lower than in, for instance, the medical fields". They list, both for Europe and the world, the top 100 and 250 universities. http://www.cwts.nl/ranking/LeidenRankingWebSite.html• SCImago Institutions Rankings: 2009 world report. This is a research group headquartered at the University of Granada in Granada, Spain. They report a "ranking with more than 2000 of the best worldwide research institutions and organizations whose output surpass 100 scholarly publications during 2007. The ranking shows 5 indicators of institution research performance, stressing output (ordering criteria), collaboration and impact. Analyzed institutions are grouped into five research sectors: Government, Higher
Page 13.1089.3individual’s opportunities for success. Though we faced other difficulties, the selection andacceptance of the ethnographic interview for our methodology was not a stumbling block for theengineers on the team.Grounding our interpretations in the data and not in pre-determined theoretical frameworkproved difficult for us and even more difficult for reviewers of submitted publications. Unlikewith the scientific method where an experiment is designed to confirm or refute a hypothesis,discourse analysis rarely begins from a defined theoretical framework. An accepted practice inethnographic based research is for interpretation of discourse to be grounded in the data not thetheoretical framework [28]. The danger of grounding
a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech. Prior to her time at Georgia Tech, she received her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from MIT and her M.S. in Systems Engineering from the University of Virginia. Her research interests include engineering design education (especially in regards to the design of complex systems), student preparation for post-graduation careers, and innovations in research-to-practice.Dr. Walter C. Lee, Virginia Tech Dr. Walter Lee is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education and the Assistant Di- rector for Research in the Center for the Enhancement of Engineering Diversity (CEED), both at Virginia Tech. Lee’s research interests include co-curricular support
as an officer and Army Aviator. He is a graduate of Michigan State University (BS in Mechanical Engineering) and The Pennsylvania State University (MS in Aerospace Engineering). Major Duling’s research interests are in swashplateless and conventional helicopter rotor dynamics, rotorcraft stability and control, and evolutionary optimization. Page 22.415.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Daily Review Quizzes – a Hindrance or a Help?AbstractThis paper reports on a study of the costs and benefits of conducting frequent in-class reviewquizzes in undergraduate
., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012840Sleimen-Malkoun, R., Temprado, J. J., & Hong, S. L. (2015). Aging induced loss of complexity and dedifferentiation: consequences for coordination dynamics within and between brain, muscular and behavioral levels. From Brain to Body: The Impact of Nervous System Declines on Muscle Performance in Aging. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00140Sloane, F. (2006). Normal and design sciences in education: Why both are necessary. Educational design research, 19-44.Stamovlasis, D. (2016). Nonlinear Dynamical Interaction
that all faculty members hired in the future either have a basic background in research or participate in a required introduction to research and scholarship during their first six months of employment. 4. Develop a scholarship mentoring system for all new faculty members, so that new hires are paired with a successful researcher from their discipline. 5. Develop a basic research course for all graduate students from all disciplines so that all of them have a basic working knowledge of research principles. This step would enhance the ability of students to work with faculty on research projects. Topics in the course could include such things as basic statistics, research designs, qualitative and quantitative
investigation.IntroductionIntroduction of Problem The problem addressed in this research investigation was the creation of a program thatengaged students in science, the development of instruments to assess the program gains ofstudents, to assess the quality of this program, and support other institutions in applying thisprogram to have a more significant impact on the education of students. This article describesthe first three objectives of the answer to this problem forming the foundation for the laterobjective of generalizing the program and assessing the gains of institution over time.Relevance of Program The U.S. falling behind in the area of science and technology compared to othercountries is a legitimate concern. Motivating undergraduates to enter
Paper ID #23080WIP: High-Achieving Students’ Perceptions of and Approaches to ProblemSolving in Introductory Engineering Science CoursesRebecca LeBow, Tufts UniversityDr. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Assistant Professor of Ed- ucation at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college-level en- gineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school experience
through college.Dr. Kristen B Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Associate Professor of Education at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college- level engineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school ex- perience, especially in under-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE). https://engineering.tufts.edu/me/people/faculty/kristen- bethke-wendellProf. Chris Buergin
Engineering Professor. With this opportunity, Hern´an is able to further his understanding of both engineering and education to aid the generations who aim to become future engineers.Dr. Kristen B. Wendell, Tufts University Kristen Wendell is Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Adjunct Assistant Professor of Ed- ucation at Tufts University. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach focus on supporting discourse and design practices during K-12, teacher education, and college-level en- gineering learning experiences, and increasing access to engineering in the elementary school experience, especially in under-resourced schools. In 2016 she was a recipient of the U.S. Presidential
: Note: Students were given the understanding of current divider rules in series, parallel networks. This problem is the application of these concepts and their inter-relationship. Students had not seen a similar problem before.Data Collection: The class survey was tested for reliability and validity before it was used fordata collection. The items were reviewed several times by the researchers and the departmentfaculty for their structure, simplicity and intended meaning. It was then pilot tested on five upperlevel graduate students. Items were revised many times and some were rewritten based on thefeedback from the faculty and the students. After obtaining approval from the
- building in instructional technology.Alana Unfried, North Carolina State University Alana Unfried is a Graduate Research Assistant at the Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University. She works on the Data Analytics team for the MISO Project (Maximizing the Impact of STEM Outreach through Data-Driven Decision Making), funded by the National Science Foundation. Alana’s responsibilities include the development of statistically sound evaluation instruments for teachers and students involved in these campus outreach programs. She also analyzes survey results and related data to understand the collective impact of these pre-college outreach programs. Alana is also a full-time Ph.D. student
-M in 2003, she was the Richard L. Terrell Professor of Excellence in Teaching, founding director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and associate professor of electrical engineering at Kettering University. In her current role, she coordinates faculty and TA professional development in the College of Engineering, conducts rigorous engineering education research, and promotes the growth of engineering education both locally at UM and nationally. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include evaluating methods to improve teaching, studying faculty motivation to change classroom practices, and exploring ethical decision-making in engineering students. She also has established a national
. Sanjeev Bedi P.Eng., University of Waterloo Dr. Sanjeev Bedi is the Director of the Engineering Ideas Clinic. He earned his PhD from the University of Victoria in 1987. As a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Waterloo, his research focus is machining, and he is well known for developing innovative 5-axis tool-positioning and flank- milling techniques. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Engineering Design Days: Engaging Students with Authentic Problem- Solving in an Academic HackathonAbstractThis paper describes the evidence-based use of a hackathon model to address student learningoutcomes in first-year Engineering programs