and electronic imaging. She is a member of ASEE, SWE, Tau Beta Pi and Eta Kappa Nu. Page 23.944.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 One Last Tool for Their Toolbox: Preparing Students for Capstone DesignIntroduction:In many electrical engineering programs, students are required to demonstrate the success oftheir capstone design project by building and testing a prototype. Depending on the nature andcomplexity of the design specifications, the final product may be a composite of analog anddigital, hardware and software, discrete
Optimization, Design, and Engineering Education Lab) Group. His research group currently performs research in the areas of system design, manufacturing, and their respective education. His system design research focuses on developing computational representation and reasoning support for managing complex system design through the use of Model Based approaches. The goal of Dr. Morkos’ manufacturing research is to fundamentally reframe our understanding and utilization of product and process representations and computational reasoning capabilities to support the development of models which help engineers and project planners intelligently make informed decisions. On the engineering education front, Dr. Morkos’ research
; student engineering identity development; institutional diversity and equity policy; history and theory of higher education.Dr. Erin E. Doran, Iowa State University Dr. Erin Doran is an Assistant Professor of Higher Education at Iowa State University.Dr. Sarah Rodriguez, Iowa State University Sarah Rodriguez, PhD, is an assistant professor of Higher Education at Iowa State University. Dr. Ro- driguez’s research addresses issues of equity, access, and retention for Latina/o students in the higher education pipeline, with a focus on the intersections of gender and race/ethnicity for Latinas in STEM. She has experience coordinating large-scale interdisciplinary research projects focused on engineering and other STEM
investigator for the “Back-To-Basics” project aimed at engineering student retention.Nikhil Satyala, University of Texas-Tyler NIKHIL SATYALA received the Bachelors degree in Electronics and Communication Engineering from the Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University (JNTU), India in 2004. He is currently pursuing his Masters degree at the University of Texas at Tyler, while working as a research assistant. His research interests include embedded systems, dual-core processor architectures and microprocessors. Page 12.152.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 A Virtual Machine
prototyping platform. Although the main focus of the labs is onarchitectural design, hardware implementation, and hardware / software verification; eachassignment also involves both a functional correctness as well as an optional performanceoptimization component. Only by analyzing the interactions between the graphics application,middleware, architecture, and logic levels can the performance optimization goal be achieved.Each subsequent challenge builds upon those previous, such that by the end of the semesterstudents will have designed and implemented a fully-functional OpenGL-compliant graphicsprocessor, capable of running significant applications. The course was introduced in the Spring of2011 and the results from the final course project
anengineering perspective (within the BS-EET program). The AAS-EET to BS-EET transfertransition is further described in Strangeway et al.15 Although it was not required that the seniorproject was a design project, all BS-EET senior projects were design projects that wereindistinguishable in level and scope from projects completed by traditional BSEE students at thesame institution.Since fall term 2003, 231 students from these AAS-EET programs transferred into the BS-EETprogram at MSOE, 44 are currently attending, six have changed programs to EE, and 147 havegraduated to date. The graduation rate, not counting students currently in the BS-EET programand those who changed programs to EE, is 81 percent. If students who left the program beforegraduation in
could become significant undertaking for the instructor and has likelydissuaded adaptation into some courses. With a better understanding of the time commitment andpossible avenues for implementation, more instructors could be compelled to try.In this work, an instructor in the field of Electrical and Computer Engineering converted threecourses to competency-based grading and allowed unlimited resubmissions for all quizzes, exams,and homework assignments (only final projects were exempt from resubmission). Data weregathered regarding the number of resubmissions, the faculty time grading, and the impact of theinfinite resubmission policy. In two semesters, these data are compared for three different courses,as well as compared to previous
curriculum and in considering the impact on the electronic measurement practices acrossall courses. Several of the key best practices are summarized below: • Utilization of common platforms when appropriate. A single mobile measurement platform is to be used throughout the curriculum in order to minimize costs for students and avoid requiring students to constantly learn new hardware platforms. • Utilization of a flipped lab environment as appropriate. With a mobile studio platform, the weekly lab is envisioned to serve as an open meeting where students can work on their experiments, ask questions, and demonstrate performance, but is no longer the sole work time for building and testing their projects. This allows
assistants. It is suggested that video chat or pictures beused to troubleshoot labs. It is also suggested that online basic tutorial videos on items such asbreadboards, batteries, basic troubleshooting skills and other items students need to use bedeveloped.3.6.4 Learning Outcomes for the Laboratory ComponentThe original proposal for our online course research project concluded that most of theeducational objectives of a laboratory experience could be replicated online. However, summer Page 22.1549.82010 experience also indicated that there were three learning outcomes that could not bereplicated. These include instrumentation, psychomotor, and
current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of engineering education research, and she was part of a team that studied ethical decision-making in engineering students.Dr. Harry Courtney Powell, University of Virginia Harry Powell is a Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Charles L. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Virginia. After receiving a Bachelor’s Degree in Electrical Engineering in1978 he was an active research and design
Transforming Undergraduate Education inEngineering (TUEE), a framework for developing Knowledge, Skills, and Abilities/Attitudes(KSAs) was proposed. In Phase I of the project [5], industry participants shared that they foundcurrent training of graduates to be inadequate to meet present industry needs and out of sync withfuture requirements. They identified core competencies and an array of skills and professionalqualities needed in a “T-shaped engineering graduate—one who brings broad knowledge acrossdomains, deep expertise within a single domain, and the ability to collaborate with others in adiverse workforce.” Among the 36 KSAs that were identified, 9 correspond to knowledge, 14 toskills, and 13 to abilities. Besides non-technical and interpersonal
pedagogical and organizational model treats the undergraduate degreeas a complex system, giving consideration to the interconnectivity and integration of fundamentalconcepts across the program. This holistic approach emphasizes knowledge integration and weaveskey threads (creativity, foundations, and professionalism) throughout the curriculum, stitching to-gether and reinforcing relevant themes from the freshman to senior years.With the goal of showing students why math is critical to becoming a successful engineer, thispaper focuses on the foundations thread of the RED project. Even though the foundations threadencompasses topics in both math and science, this paper shines a light on mathematics and the roleit plays in retention. The paper
began teaching at the University of Utah later that year. He has taught one or more classes at the university every year since that time, including seven years he spent working in industry. Since 2000, he has primarily taught introductory circuits courses. His research interests, which have recently been revived, focus on spiking neural networks.Prof. Angela Rasmussen, University of Utah Dr. Angela Rasmussen is the Director of Mentoring and Advising, Director of Electrical Engineering Senior Projects, and Associate Professor in the Electrical and Computer Engineering Department at the University of Utah. Dr. Rasmussen graduated with a B.S. in Computer Engineer(1996), summa cum laude and top student in her
theoretical courses before they obtain the knowledge and skill setnecessary to complete a meaningful technical project. This long wait time between studentsentering the engineering and technology (ET) program and when they have had the opportunityto apply content knowledge to a meaningful technical project does have a negative impact on thestudent enthusiasm and motivation to stay in the degree2. Identifying this challenge, severalengineering educators have updated their curricula to engage students in hands-on designprojects in the first-year curriculum. While this method potentially keeps students motivated, it isoften difficult to find an engineering project that first-year students can succeed in, due to theirlimited technical knowledge and
andinteractive learning approaches and realistic examples, such as PETL (Wang, 2010), problem- Page 26.1062.2based learning (Yilmazer & Sekar, 2011), project-based learning (Carroll, Geiser, & Levine,2014), example-based learning (Hoffbeck J. , 2014) and visualization (Devore & Soldan, 2012).The work presented in this paper fits in this topic as it presents new interactive materials andexamples that increase engagement, even in large ( enrollment >150) classes.A third group of papers recently published in ASEE were concerned with the specifics ofteaching and learning about concepts in DLD. Peterson & Clark (Peterson & Clark, 2012
Louisiana Tech University. His current activities focus on project based learning and online student assessment. Page 26.246.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 ASSESSING THE EFFECT OF ONLINE HOMEWORK ON STUDENT LEARNING IN A FIRST CIRCUITS COURSEIntroductionTo meet the needs of today's students and to maximize efficient use of faculty resources,electronically delivered homework is becoming ever more popular in higher education. Inmathematics, for example, online homework can be found for a wide range of courses at avariety of schools, ranging from community colleges
interest students to attend graduate school afterdegree completion. REU participants are matched with a Primary Investigator (PI) and GraduateMentor as well as a project based on students’ interests.To produce Engineers of 2020, this REU Program integrated aspirations of the National Societyof Engineers from the early 2000s. The select stated objectives were to “produce engineers withtechnical competence and a broader array of professional skills,” improve “retention of studentsand broader participation of women and [underrepresented] minorities” (URM), enable smoothtransitions between community colleges and four-year universities, and “introduceinterdisciplinary learning in the undergraduate environment” [2]. The year 2020 is no longer adistant
engineering terms and formatting (g1) - Perform professional presentations individually and as part of a team using effective visual techniques (g2)SLOs AssessmentThe purpose of the assessment process is to develop a reliable and a consistent approach toassess student outcomes6. Developing an assessment process starts by identifying the studentlearning outcomes (SLOs)4, then assessing whether the assessment process achieves theseoutcomes, and finally provides evidence of improvement based on the analysis of those results.In our EE program, the assessment of the student learning outcomes is based on the followingdirect and indirect measures: a) Direct Measures Student performance on exams, tests, and projects are used to measure specific
specializations. This paper considersthe recruitment aspect of this project. Demographic studies indicate that our target audiencestrongly identify with being “geeks”, something that no New Zealand tertiary traininginstitute incorporates into its marketing strategy. In response, a novel website, hard-copy“geek hero” publication and clothing range was created. The publications have beenextremely well received by secondary school students, teachers and career advisors.Informative and promotional posters have also been created for display in secondary schoollaboratories and classrooms. Whilst final enrolment numbers are not at this stage known, oneindicator of the success of our initiatives can be seen in the unprecedented increase in pre-enrolment
Engineering and Computer Science at Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Ariz.. His areas of interest are systems and control, global learning, and engineering pedagogy.Dr. Sheryl L. Howard, Northern Arizona University Page 25.486.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 ECE Curriculum Improvement to Incorporate Global LearningI. introductionTraditional Electrical Engineering curricula include courses in the fundamentals of electrical engi-neering, senior elective courses in specialized topics, and a capstone senior project. Labs providestudents with experience in hardware and software
grained data as follows: foreach assignment, project, or test the instructor must provide a triple: 1. A mapping from the item to the course outcomes. For a test it would map each question; for an assignment or project it would map the grading rubric. 2. The data showing how each student did on the individual questions (or rubric). 3. The actual exam or assignment (simply for documentation purposes).Here is an example of the mapping for an exam that had four questions. Question 1 has an x in column ii, which, looking in Table 3,means it was about “An understanding of how to use interaction diagrams to help define requirements.” Some questions can andtypically do have multiple x’s, meaning it addresses several of the course
B. MakramDr. Rajendra Singh, Clemson University Dr. Rajendra Singh is currently D. Houser Banks Professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering and the Director of the Center for Silicon Nanoelectronics at Clemson University. With proven success in operations, project/program leadership, R&D, product/process commercialization, and start-ups, Dr. Singh has over 33 years of industrial and academic experience of photovoltaic (PV) and semiconductor industries. From solar cells to integrated circuits, he has led the work on semiconductor and PV device, materials and processing by manufacturable innovation and defining critical path. He has published over 340 papers in various journals and
- grams. She has numerous chapters, articles, and papers on technology-supported teaching and learning as well as systems-change stages pertaining to technology adoption.Kathy Ann Gullie PhD, University at Albany-SUNY Dr. Kathy Gullie has extensive experience as a Senior Evaluator and Research Associate at the University at Albany/SUNY. She is currently the principal investigator in several educational grants including an NSF engineering grant supporting Historically Black University and Colleges; ”Building Learning Com- munities to Improve Student Achievement: Albany City School District” , and ”Educational Leadership Program Enhancement Project at Syracuse University” Teacher Leadership Quality Program. She is also
TQFP package, but it would also reduce time required in class, and this trade-off should be considered. Two boards were designed at Oregon Institute of Technology. The Sidewinder was designedto be a low-cost replacement for an aging Digital Logic I course. The OwlBoard was designedto be a board that students build in class. The experiences encountered while developing andusing these boards are documented in the following sections.4.2 Sidewinder: Board designed for outside manufacturing This board was originally designed by a student, Dustin Henderson, as part of a indepen-dent study project in PCB design. It was then modified for manufacturing. With all of the troubles encountered when shipping the Sidewinder design
Paper ID #14457Redesigning Computer Engineering Gateway Courses Using a Novel Reme-diation HierarchyProf. Ronald F. DeMara, University of Central Florida Ronald F. DeMara is a Professor in the College of Engineering and Computer Science (CECS) with 23 years of university-level faculty experience in Electrical and Computer Engineering disciplines. He has completed 180+ technical and educational publications, 34 funded projects as PI/Co-I, and established two research laboratories. He serves as the Computer Engineering Program Coordinator, the founding Director of the Evaluation and Proficiency Center (EPC) in CECS, and
must perform an annual assessment. Theprimary reason for this assessment is to demonstrate the learning community is meeting its statedoutcomes. There are three general reasons to assess any project or program- to improve theprogram or project; to inform stakeholders whether the program, or project, is achieving it’sgoals; or to prove a program, or project is meeting, or has met its intended goals. [6]Traditionally, the evaluation in EELC is done via different tools. For the material at hand theevaluation has been done by homework, quizzes, tests, and laboratory reports. In addition tothat, one-on-one interviews are conducted, with each student, twice during the term and wouldidentify weakness and strengths for each student. The interview
Paper ID #32829Introducing Communications to High School Students by Leveraging Zoomasa Communications PlatformProf. Curt Schurgers, University of California, San Diego Curt Schurgers is an Associate Teaching Professor in the UCSD Electrical and Computer Engineering Department. His research and teaching are focused on course redesign, active learning, and project- based learning. He also co-directs an undergraduate research program, Engineers for Explorations, in which undergraduates spearhead real-world engineering challenges that impact the world of exploration and resource conservation. Curt Schurgers received his B.S
Spread Spectrum or OFDM are introduced.We now discuss examples of the experiments and projects that the students were able tocomplete with this setup. We consider experiments in both analog and digital communications.Analog LabsLab #1: Introduction to SDRThis introductory lab is intended to familiarize students with SDR. The lab explores a fewdifferent methods of using SDR, first using Windows, and then transitioning to a Linuxdistribution. This lab employs the RTL-SDR using both analysis and development tools.In Windows, students begin experimenting with SDR#. Because FM radio is one of the strongestcommon signals present within the tuning range of the RTL-SDR, it is chosen as the signal todemodulate in this introductory lab. Students
expertise in the topic proposed (both teaching andresearch) and have been with world-known security and cryptography groups. This project isaddressing the respective tradeoffs between the IWMDs security levels and affording theoverheads. To meet this objective, we have used such methodology for two years in educatinggraduate students and brought them very well up to speed which resulted in successful research(publications in top-tier electrical and computer engineering IEEE Transactions journals for thecase study of fault analysis attacks).The assessment strategy for the proposed integration is two-fold. A pilot project is developed(through work of undergraduate and graduate students) for testing the pedagogy in three phases:(a) education, (b
students that took traditional precalculus versus those thattook the “Engineering Applications of Mathematics” course. Their study showed promisingresults in favor of their new course. Salzman, et al., also adopted the work done by Klingbeil inmodifying their “Introduction to Engineering” course, with one of the bigger changes to theiroriginal course being a shift from open-ended design projects to mathematics focused projects.The data provided in [6] anecdotally shows that the math focused course was beneficial for thefollowing mathematics and science courses. There have been other studies on the impact of anintroductory mathematics course centered around engineering applications on student retention,motivation, and ability in later courses as