, which more nearly reflects the environment in which a professionalengineer will have to work; students must learn how to function as a team by planning theteam’s activities and the tasks associated with a project, all within the framework ofmilestones and the deliverables.As we have discussed in our earlier paper [1], one of the major assignments has been theresearch-based final report – a necessity in a course where the students come fromdifferent disciplines and represent different levels of experience within an engineeringprogram. While some, like Irish, might argue that such an assignment is an academicrather than an engineering genre, the final report is far more than just an exercise in“knowledge assembly” [17]. “Staged” assignments are
based on individual expertise.Each team member had the same number of pieces to write and was assigned an editing buddyfrom within the team. The idea was that an individual would create a training and assessmentpiece and then have their editing buddy provide feedback. The plan was designed to optimize ourprogress in moving forward.Before actually beginning to create training documents or tutorials we held several brainstormingsessions about different tools we could use. We realized early on that different competencieswould require different methods of training and assessment, and we explored many possibilities.Several team members looked into already created materials that are provided by librarywebsites, teaching librarians, or commercial
[1]. Assessment of every aspect of curricular, co-curricular, and larger educational environmental aspects is the norm. Evidence-based decision-making leads those working in every aspect of higher education today to seek out or deviseassessment tools and plans to observe efficacy and introduce well-considered evidence-basedchanges where room for improvement in outcomes seems indicated. The National Survey ofStudent Engagement, or NSSE, is a widely applied instrument in the U.S. and Canada. NSSEallows participating institutions to get a periodic high-level snapshot of how their incoming First-year and near-graduation (Senior) students compare to one another, and compare to those fromother similar institutions, in their self-perceptions of
-level 3Dprinting sessions for returning students and/or expanding the program to other middle schools inthe local area.References 1. Gonzalez, S. and D. Bennett. (Fall 2014). Planning a 3D Printing Service in an Academic Library. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship. 78. DOI:10.5062/F4M043CC 2. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 Framework Definitions. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf 3. Johnson, M., M.J. Clapp, S.R. Ewing, and A.G. Buhler. (2011). Building a Participatory Culture: Collaborating with Student Organizations for 21st Century Library Instruction. Collaborative Librarianship. 3(1), 2-15
volunteer coordinator who changes each year, the librarians, andtheir particular knowledge and skill strengths, and the ever-changing access to resources.Developing Library InstructionFrom the very beginning the librarians worked with course coordinators to decide howmuch and what kind of information the students needed. They knew some students wouldbe familiar with public libraries and some could be familiar with the UBC Library systemif they had previously taken Humanities 101. The 2nd year coordinator’s initial passionand interest in making an accessible course helped to shape the approach the librarianstook with each subsequent class as the years passed. In meetings to plan the library’spresentation each coordinator has brought their own
to the presentation was positive, and we will keep them abreast of ourprogress as part of our plan to gain endorsement of the program at the College level.Teamwork WorkshopOur literature review on engineering students’ workplace readiness identified explicit instructionin teamwork skills as an unfulfilled need.9, 10 Although our survey did not specifically ask aboutteamwork, we acted on this trend in the literature. One of the survey authors worked with theScience and Engineering Library’s instruction coordinator to develop a workshop, Team Skills:Library Tools for Collaboration, to address this deficit.The workshop covers “soft” team skills like meeting facilitation (e.g., effective and energizingice breakers and brainstorming); project and
to Knovel’s success was application of this experience in the development of information products for applied scientists and engineers. Page 15.916.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 New Knovel InterfaceAbstractIn the past year Knovel interface has undergone several facelifts and some more seriouschanges. This paper discusses user centric approach to design and implementation of newgraphic user interface. New features, including Knovel Lab, Data Search, autocomplete,spell checker, browse interface, My Knovel and Knovel Math are discussed. Currentwork and plans for the future
previous section, even the proximity in printed textbooks is far from ideal. In thebooks studied, 36.6 percent of the references were to objects that were not proximate (see Table3). Page 23.1008.7Intelligent digital composition should be able to overcome this limitation. For example, a devicescreen could be divided into two windows – one with the text being read, and the other withreferenced material. With high resolution note-pad devices, 100 percent proximity should beachievable. This type of next-generation e-textbook could improve proximity and potentiallyimprove student learning as compared to printed textbooks. In planning research
performance” [3]. Planned repetition ofexperiences, information, testing, and material in a design course supports the learner as theyexpand their understanding of how best to solve the problem at hand.The literature contains significant discussion of the role of scaffolded assignments in engineeringand engineering design courses [4], [5], and [6]. As described by Tom Eppes et al., scaffoldingorganizes learning into progressively challenging modules in which assistance is graduallyremoved as students develop and practice new skills [7]. Each time students revisit a particularskill or concept, they become more confident in their ability to use it in their coursework. AtPurdue University, Lisa Bosman combined the concept of connected, scaffolded
of the curriculum and teaching from the instructor’s perspective. Seldin11focuses on assessing plan, procedures, preconditions, and products as elements of teachingevaluation. Stevenson and Kokkinn12 propose a method of evaluation of teaching using lists ofevaluative statements. Ramsden and Dodds13 recommend the use of generalized questions inevaluation of content (what should be conveyed to the student) and structure (teaching methods).Recognizing that “[c]ommunication and collaboration with faculty are increasingly important inthe development of both curriculum-integrated and stand-alone “just in time” library tutorials,”Appelt and Pendell14 employ faculty feedback on tutorial structure, discipline-specific content,and content integration
(3), 188-198. doi: 10.1016/j.iilr.2008.06.0046. Jeffries, S. (2000). The librarian as networker: Setting the standard for higher education. In R. Raspa, & D. Ward (Eds.). The collaborative imperative: Librarians and faculty working together in the information universe (pp. 114-129). Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.7. Stoddart, R. A.; Bryant, T. W.; Baker, A. L.; Lee, A.; Spencer, B. (2006). PERSPECTIVES ON…Going boldly beyond the reference desk: Practical advice and learning plans for new reference librarians performing liaison work. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(4), 419-427. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2006.03.0098. Beck, D. M., & Callison, R. (2006). Becoming a science librarian: Accident
to being comprehensive, the search must betransparent and reproducible; it is common to have the search strategy for a systematic reviewundergo peer review by another librarian before searching is carried out. This emphasis onquality search has led to the adoption of a variety of librarian roles in the execution of asystematic review. A 2018 scoping review [19] identified eighteen roles filled by librarians insystematic reviews. In addition to the expected roles of searching, source selection, andevaluation, the authors also documented librarians acting in planning, question formulation andpeer review roles. The roles described are not mutually exclusive; often a librarian will take onseveral of these roles as part of a given systematic
review of theresponses indicated that 26.89 percent (n=82 of 305) answered a usable portion of the survey.The second question was “What research metrics services does your library offer?” The questionis further nuanced by asking respondents to indicate if the service is formal, informal, planning aformal service, investigating or none. Detailed results are given in Figure 1 with 26.89 percent(n=82 of 305) answering parts of the question. With the exception of “One-on-oneconsultations” 56.10 percent (n=46 of 82), only a small number of engineering librariansindicated the existence of a formal service for the list of services posed. Other responsesindicating formal services in existence ranged from low of 3.70 percent (n= 3 of 81) to 7.50percent
first student-run hackathon at Drexel, Dragonhacks, with over 500 partici- pants. She hosts STEM events for over one hundred middle school students. She serves over 500 members by planning numerous IEEE technical and non-technical events, and also serves as a mentor for Women in Computer Science. Savannah completed two co-ops as a Hardware Engineer at Woodward McCoach and a Mission Systems Engineer at Lockheed Martin. She was recently awarded the Alan Kirsch Award, Larry K Wilson Award, and the ECE Department Award for her leadership. For the 2015-16 and 2016-17 year she was awarded the Lillian Moller Gilbreth Memorial scholarship from Society of Women Engineers. In her free time, Savannah volunteers on the Mother
Scotia. It is located on the downtown Sexton Campus, and serves the facultiesof Architecture, Engineering and Planning. A small campus with approximately 2,500 studentswithin those faculties, it makes up about 15% of Dal’s total enrollment of approximately 17,000students. Dal’s Department of Civil and Resource Engineering is comprised of 19 professors and7 adjunct professors, while the Mechanical Engineering Department is comprised of 12professors and 7 adjunct professors.Woodward Library at the University of British Columbia (UBC) in Vancouver, British Columbiaserves the faculties of Applied Science, Dentistry, Forestry, Land & Food Systems, Medicine,and Science. The approximately 6,500 undergraduate and graduate engineering students make
from kindergarten through higher education [6] and established theRight Question Institute specifically to address this educational goal [7, 8].The QFT has six core components [7]: 1. Determining a question focus that is the topic in which the student will write about whether this is self-chosen or pre-determined by the instructors. 2. Producing questions using a set of four rules that essentially allows the student to ask what is of particular interest to them about the question focus without limitation or judgement. 3. Identifying closed and open-ended questions, and how to use them appropriately. 4. Selection of priority questions. 5. Planning how to continue after the questions have been
toresearch a medical device, current status of FDA approval, and intellectual property relateddocuments for those medical devices. For a medical device that has recently been approved bythe FDA, they are required to develop a business plan for a possible commercialization of thatproduct. What type of assistance can an experienced librarian provide to the new librarian?How can Web 2.0 tools help students keep current with the latest developments in medicaldevices? Increased cognizance of alerting services available from resources such as ASCE, IEEEXplore,Web of Knowledge, ScienceDirect and Engineering Village, is the crucial first step intheir effective use by faculty and students.The experienced librarian can initiate conversations highlighting case
Civil Engineers as Audio-Visual Librarian. In 1978, following the retirement of H C Richardson, the Librarian, Mike became Deputy Librarian and for the best part of a decade worked with Doreen Bayley, the Librarian, in improving services, notably retrospectively converting the Library Catalogues to one online catalogue (the first unified catalogue since 1895). This project was continued after Doreen’s retirement in 1987 with a single computerised index of all ICE publications, and the digitisation of all ICE journals the first engineering institution in the world to carry out such a project. When the ICE building was refurbished c.1990 he planned the Library accommodation. Early in his career at ICE Mike became
onIntellectual Property to be completed in weeks ten to eleven. Paper or online pre- and post-assessments were provided for each session to see what was known at the beginning and the endof each session. Students also completed a graded plagiarism tutorial and quiz. The assessmentresults have been much better. This paper will focus on the changes in the information sessionsand delivery methods, provide assessment data for each area, and chronicle the steps taken to setup this successful collaborative effort with the engineering instructors.IntroductionThe opportunity to teach library information literacy skills to all freshman engineering studentsin ENGR 101, Engineering Problem Solving I, began in spring 2011. Planning effectiveteaching modules
Paper ID #30496The Case for Data Sharing Policies and FAIR Sharing Principles:Analyzing Journals and Articles of Engineering and Medical FacultyChris Wiley, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Physical Science and Engineering Research Data Services Librarian American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 The Case for Data Sharing Policies and FAIR Sharing Principles: Analyzing Journals and Articles of Engineering and Medical FacultyAbstractNumerous government and private funding agencies require data management plans andencourage data sharing. These
anotherdatabase. If they are primarily engineers, I always do this exercise. Every class I have. I will sayI want you to use the engineering databases. Find good resources. Then I would break them intoteams; we use that approach sometimes too. So, the active learning is all the difference in theworld, they get hands-on, then can peek over each other's shoulders, they can work in teams, theycan see how it works, and they can see the results.[I2]"A second theme concerning instruction that arose was that assignments have to be course specificand help the faculty in teaching what they already were planning on teaching:"The second thing is to not make it something that is really time-intensive, to take as much of theworkload off them [faculty members], to
attention to elements on slides being discussed.22 At the same time, make use of drawing tools or turn on the option for participants to view the curser. Live demonstrations involve sharing the computer desktop or a particular application. Open applications beforehand and prepare browsers at websites of interest to prevent dead time. Just as with face-to-face sessions, you can present case studies or prompt students for topic suggestions if illustrating search tools. It can be distracting for participants to move back and forth from applications to the web conferencing software so it may require more planning in advance. Try to slow down when demonstrating, since there may be a delay between what the
participating in this workshopstated in support of the findings in this survey, that “I liked the ethics one because I never reallyconsidered the ethical questions of research before. Ethics in research. This was never coveredin any of my classes, so I enjoyed this and plan to take an ethics course.” This statementprovided by the student further supports our work in relation to the ABET student outcome 4 thatengineering students should have “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilitiesin engineering situations and make informed judgments…” [11].Table 1.3, analyzes professional skills in relation to scholarly communication. Within thissession, we explored concepts around Finding academic resources; Determining the validity of
practicing engineers become licensed but this percentage increases to 50 percent for civilengineers [4]. There are many advantages to becoming a PE. For example, engineering plans anddrawings can only be signed and sealed by a PE no matter if the engineer works in the public orprivate sector [5]. Those engineers who do earn PE licenses have more professionalopportunities, responsibilities, and prestige [6]. According to a 2019 article based on a survey bythe American Society of Civil Engineers, PEs earn higher salaries than non-PEs [7].The Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc. (ABET), a non-governmentalorganization, accredits post-secondary education programs in engineering. ABET accreditation isverification that a collegiate
in engineering literature is self-plagiarism. These results 10suggest that engineering students may need more explicit and robust instruction inpublishing ethics and scientific integrity. Equipped with this knowledge, engineeringlibrarians can plan for focused scholarly communication training, alone or incollaboration with other library departments. Due to their expert knowledge ofengineering sources and literature, engineering librarians are well positioned tocontribute to the scholarly communication system practice by the engineering scientistsand graduate students. While undergraduate students do not conduct and publishresearch as often as graduate
recorded directlyinto the grade book.At first, the author planned to incorporate a quiz into the video itself. Camtasia software allowsquestions to be inserted into a video which can even be reported directly into a BlackBoardcourse’s grade book. However, four videos would mean four tests, each of which would have tobe connected to each BlackBoard course’s grade book. It was determined to separate the testfrom the videos. The solution was simply to create a test directly in BlackBoard’s test manager.The test was then exported and sent to each faculty member. While some professors are usingthe test as part of their grade for the class, others are using it simply as a tool to see if thestudents have watched the video.Measuring the EffectivenessIn
the home server), and if anew version of the toolbar is available it makes the update available for automaticinstallation. This functionality ensures that security updates, link repairs, and othernecessary changes are carried out and that the toolbar continues to function.Libraries that are interested in their own toolbar projects will need to address requiredresources as well as plans for continued maintenance. Ongoing support for the OUEngineering Toolbar has been simple to this date; however, the concept, development,deployment, and maintenance are handled by the author of this article. Discussions withother libraries that provide toolbars highlight that this seems to be a unique situation asmost often toolbars are either constructed by
.) has beenseamlessly integrated with standard engineering content online. Mathcad is a ComputerAided Design platform with calculation, graphing, text formatting and reporting capabilitieswhich can be used to transcribe engineering content, e.g., calculation examples. Challengesencountered during creation of this unique product, product features, expansion plans for theoffering and initial customer response are discussed by an engineer who spearheaded theeffort.Brief Overview of KnovelKnovel is an award-winning, Web-based library of e-references (e-books and databases) forapplied scientists and engineers.Knovel adds value to e-books by making them interactive. Interactive book tools includetables, graphs and equations. There are several
conference type publications. To help students unsure of thefiner points of MS Word, use was made of an interactive tool which is essentially a tailoredMS Word help package. This had already been developed by the Department of MechanicalEngineering and takes the user through the main features of MS Word for technicaldocumentation.Peer feedbackThe software package Aröpa was developed by the Department of Computer Science toenable peer assessment, peer marking, collating results and receiving feedback. Threesubmissions to Aröpa were planned during the project course, with no formal marks assignedto them. The submissions were: 1. Project objectives – the requirement was to submit a description of the project and some clear objectives. 2
topic or content, the librarianalways referred the teams back to the professor for clarification.AssessmentThe librarian is working on assessing her teaching with the teams and learning what the studentsneed in terms of research resources. She has partnered with an Education Librarian to exploredifferent methods to assess the two classes. Currently they are using a one-minute essay todocument what students have learned after the first library session. Later, after the due date ofthe technical paper, they plan to hold focus group sessions with the students to learn about theirresearch needs and how they filled them. Another idea for the fall semester is to follow a fewteams and determine when and how often the students need intervention from the