Paper ID #34482Computer Interfacing to Real-world: Low-cost ApproachDr. Rungun Nathan, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Rungun Nathan is a professor and program chair for the mechanical engineering in the division of engineering at Penn State Berks. He got his BS from University of Mysore, DIISc from Indian Institute of Science, MS from Louisiana State University and PhD from Drexel University. He has worked in Electronic Packaging in C-DOT (India) and then as a Scientific Assistant in the Robotics laboratory at Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India. He worked as a post-doc at University of Pennsylvania in
C. Hahne. Controlling quad-copters a project-based approach in the teaching of application design. In Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2014 IEEE, pages 961–968, April 2014. doi: 10.1109/EDUCON.2014.6826216. 7. Meriel Huggard and Ciar´an Mc Goldrick. Droning on: Reflections on integrating uav technology into a computer engineering design laboratory. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education, pages 504–509. ACM, 2016. 8. PHANTOM 2 User Manual. http://www.mshtools.com/ardrone/ARDrone4 Developer Guide.pdf, 2015. Accessed: 2016-01-20. 9. C. Nitschke, Y. Minami, M. Hiromoto, H. Ohshima, and T. Sato. A quadrocopter automatic control contest as an example of
University of Waterloo. He is the author of a textbook on power electronics, published by Prentice-Hall. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Indiana. He is a senior member of IEEE. Ahmed’s current interests include embedded system design, electric vehicle, and VHDL design. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Software Hardware Integration of System Design Discipline in Electrical and Computer Engineering TechnologyAbstractThe paper expounds the practices utilized in teaching an undergraduate curriculum in Electricaland Computer Engineering / Technology from the perspective of System Design. This approachis a paradigm shift from the piecemeal
mandate change when appropriate and necessary. • Be staffed with qualified faculty, and, support continuous professional development. • Receive adequate budgetary support for laboratory and teaching equipment, computer access and software, appropriate faculty development, and other reasonable and necessary needs. • Be administered by supportive and qualified administrators. • Maintain access to library and other reference materials, computers and computer software, laboratory and shop facilities as necessary to support the educational process. • Continually assess the impact of University, College, and Departmental requirements such as the University Core Curriculum, service courses both inside
; manufacturing engineering; quality; environmental, health and safety; and others. Before joining National University, he acquired 12+ years of voluntary involvement with higher education, including adjunct teaching and research in engineering at the University of Colorado and formal advisory involvement in both science and engineering at the University of Texas. Other past professional and academic activities include being a founding member and officer in the Central Texas Electronics Association; past chairman of IBM’s Materials Shared University Research Committee; Ph.D. Recruiting Coordinator for IBM’s Systems Technology Division; and executive sponsor for 3M division’s
a combination ofengineering, science, computer science, information systems, project management,telecommunications, electronics, and quality assurance topics. Every degree program requires acourse in Integrated Technology Assessment, which is equivalent to a “CAPSTONE” course.Where necessary, students are provided access to a “Virtual Laboratory” for gaining laboratoryexperience.Anwar et.al.3 provided an overview of the engineering technology programs at EC, in a paperpresented at the 2005 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Anwar4 presents details of theBEET program at EC in an article to be published in the Journal of Pennsylvania Academy ofScience.2.2 Characteristics of EC Students As stated in Section 1.0, Excelsior College
. This way, technology andengineering schools that would like to implement such a system for teaching fundamentalEngineering & Technology (ET) theory to students will not be deterred by the high costs ofimmersive facilities (e.g. CAVE). This framework can be included in the form of PBL-basedexercises or within course curriculum in ET departments/schools. PBL involves efforts on part ofthe students that involves active learning and solving real-world like problems. The proposedprototype framework can be used for such PBL exercises as demonstrated with examples in thispaper.Introduction The effectiveness of the use of non-traditional instructional methods in aiding studentlearning has been demonstrated by several notable authors
Paper ID #19377An Interdisciplinary Experimental Engineering Projects Course DevelopmentDr. Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State University Faruk Yildiz is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering Technology at Sam Houston State Uni- versity. His primary teaching areas are in Electronics, Computer Aided Design (CAD), and Alternative Energy Systems. Research interests include: low power energy harvesting systems, renewable energy technologies and education.Mr. Keith L. Coogler, Sam Houston State University Dr. Keith L. Coogler is an instructor of engineering technology at Sam Houston State University. He received a BS
both curriculums - PC Data Acquisition & Control. Use outside expertise for specialized topics until tenure track positions could be justified and current faculty could obtain additional training. Network professionals used for adjunct teaching and guest lectures. 4-Utilize an existing classroom as a temporary classroom/lab for the new courses. Obtain network equipment through industry and university donations.Challenge - A separate university support staff oversees lab computers. Their charge is to Page 11.1289.6maintain properly operating computers correctly configured for software and networkapplications. This was not
education in Six Sigma and also perform Six Sigma course projects. Atthe end of the course, they each receive their Six Sigma Green Belt certificate.ENTC 333 Product Development The Product Development Cycle is formally introduced to the students in the newlyestablished Product Development Course. This course was added to the curriculum based onfeedback from the program’s Industry Advisory Council. Emphasizing the product developmentcycle was a suggestion the IAC made to better prepare students for the follow on capstoneexperience as well as an industry relevant teaching. Through a series of lectures and laboratories,the students are led through the product development life cycle, from ideation to termination.The course uses a classical
Technology faculty was encouraged to share their successes in terms of what wasgoing well in the classes they taught that were related to the outcomes being discussed. Thefocus was on the positive aspects of their teaching rather than dwelling on problems and issuesthat needed to be resolved. As the faculty began to trust one another the dialogue continued tobe more open and informative. This discussion and analysis of the curriculum took quite a bit oftime, but was extremely beneficial in developing meaningful outcomes. This process providedthe faculty with a much better understanding of what was happening in other courses beyondtheirs and a better perspective of how the curriculum could provide the students with a buildingblock experience.Eleven
for prototyping and debugging.Educational platforms currently available are in the form of microcontroller populated boards(hard core processors) or programmable logic device boards. In the later, students can instantiatea configurable, soft core processor comparable to the one provided in the former. This leaveseducators with two distinct options for teaching embedded systems and low level programmingcourses (Note: there can be hard core processors within a programmable logic device, howeverthis paper is referring to a hard core processor as a stand-alone component).This paper is a dialogue between two faculty members, one defending design using hardcomponents, assembly and laboratory testing, and the other using soft components
of extensive industry experience in Silicon Valley working in the semiconductor industry performing software development, application engineering, de- sign, testing and verification of digital integrated circuits. He has taught electrical and general engineering classes at Pitt-Johnstown since 2004. His research and teaching interests include Semiconductor circuit Testing and Verification, Low Power Design Analysis, Digital and Embedded Systems, Electromagnetic Wave Scattering, and IC Design Au- tomation Software development. He has authored or coauthored 26 publications and he holds one US patent and another under review. He can be reached at maddu@pitt.edu 225 Engineering and Science Building University of
and approved for allmajor courses. Well-defined faculty-driven curriculum design and review processes havebeen in place for many years. Faculty members conduct assessment and attempt to Page 12.1474.2improve their courses and the degree program, by modifying teaching techniques,exercises and assignments to maximize learning. This has been an ongoing workloadexpectation at the course level for more than a decade, and is embedded in thedepartmental culture.To coordinate the assessment and evaluation process to the program level, the departmentformed an Assessment Committee to oversee the assessment activities and coordinateactions to spur continuous
3MIET 410 Mine Production Technology 3MEET 410 Industrial Operations 3GNET 499 Engineering Technology Projects 3Core Skills Social Science 3 Total 15It remains to be proven if we will be able to develop on online version of these courses in everyinstance. Italicized courses are either already offered or in development. We will need toinitially rely on the availability of some transfer coursework in the student’s area, on campusresidency, or other online courses to round out these requirements. Common market agreementsand fee structures will need to be developed. A low residency program may develop to fill insome supervision intensive laboratories. Our
Total 15Italicized courses are either already offered or in development. We will need to initially rely onthe availability of some transfer coursework in the student’s area, on campus residency, or otheronline courses to round out these requirements. Common market agreements and fee structureswill need to be developed. A low residency program may develop to fill in some supervisionintensive laboratories. Our industrial advisory board has also indicated general support, offeredsome laboratory solutions, and will be called upon to share their concerns throughout thedevelopment process.5. MIET 101 – New Miner Training Course Units OverviewUnit 1: Line of AuthorityThis lesson is included in the New Miner Training program in the form of a
issues. Those thathave no practical value or that merely serve the short term needs of an industry sponsor are notsuitable. Another challenge is setting the scope of work and level of difficulty to be appropriatefor ET seniors. Successful project management among the team members and their relationshipto the faculty and external sponsors requires an array of communication and soft skills.Resources must be factored into the planning process: e.g. fabrication capabilities, technicalsupport and/or the cost of purchased components/services. In small teaching institutions, theabove issues are especially critical and must be carefully weighed.This paper discusses the structure, approach and evolution of capstone projects within ourCollege. It compares
14.481.54 through 15 in Figure 1) for each course objective. In a nutshell, a course evaluation iscomposed of various metrics measured by the two different class participants, theinstructor and the students. Student input is explained in Section 4. All assessmentmetrics done by the instructor use traditional student work, such as homeworks,laboratories, quizzes, laboratories, projects, and exams (from now on denoted as“assignments”). This section, however, details a modified way to use assignment gradesto better measure each course objective. As the grade of an assignment may not entirelyreflect the various course learning objectives addressed in the assignment, all workrequired from the student is directly matched to a course learning objective
course in engineering foundationsand engineering applications. Based on these learning outcomes and objectives, each facultycreated syllabi appropriate for their campuses depending on class size, demography of theirstudents, and availability of laboratory resources. At the author’ campus, the size of theengineering technology program was rather size small compare to other campuses; the programhad about 35 students with a mission to reach out to students, who for genuine reasons cannot geta college or a university engineering technology education in a large campus environment. Mostof these full-time students commute to classes daily. The new freshman engineering courseconsists of a lecture-recitation component titled “Engineering Foundations
Laboratory at Case Western, Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Cal Tech, Ames Research Center at Stanford, and the Johnson Space Center at Texas A&M Universities) and the U.S. Navy (at its SPAWAR Research Center in San Diego). She has also served as a Fulbright scholar at the Nokia Wireless Communications Research Center at the University of Oulu in Finland in 2009. She is a senior member of the IEEE. Dr. Yaprak serves as an ABET IEEE/ETAC Commissioner since 2012. Currently, she serves as Program Director of Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) at the National Science Foundation (NSF). She manages a large and diverse portfolio of awards on STEM education and workforce development.Prof. Wen Chen, Wayne State University
Paper ID #24719Strategies to Improve Student Engagement in a Facilities Planning Coursethrough Hands-on Learning ActivitiesDr. Gonca Altuger-Genc, State University of New York, Farmingdale Dr. Gonca Altuger-Genc is an Assistant Professor at State University of New York - Farmingdale State College in the Mechanical Engineering Technology Department. She is serving as the Graduate Program Coordinator for the School of Engineering Technology. Her research interests are engineering education, self-directed lifelong learning, virtual laboratories, and decision-making framework development for de- sign and manufacturing
EngineeringTechnology that includes a senior level capstone course in analog integrated circuit design. Thiscourse includes a two credit hour (six contact hours per week) laboratory in which studentswould normally perform six to eight individual “canned” experiments. Recently the author hasre-structured the laboratory to become a term-long group project in the area of analog integratedcircuits. This paper describes the results of one of these team projects.IntroductionThe objective of this capstone course is to expose senior EET majors to the design process foranalog integrated circuits by working as a member of a design team. Upon completion of thiscourse, a student will have been exposed to the processes of working in a team, picking an idea,researching the
theresulting PhotoModeler outcome of the section. In Figure 4 the PhotoModeler view of the entirefactory is visible. Figure 3. A portion of the sugar and rum factory ruin and the PhotoModeler modelEducational ObjectivesHorton and Holden each hold full-time teaching appointments and were interested in providingunique educational opportunities for students involved in the project as they produced results thatcould be useful to the Park in attaining its objectives. The NPS also has a mission to providetraining opportunities for future cultural preservationists. The principal investigators sought toassure that the coursework and on-site project offered opportunities for the following educationalobjectives: 1. Students will learn and apply
is the experiences afforded students in the laboratory setting. Indeed, manyengineering technology students excel in coursework that fosters the tactile-kinestheticeducational domain. A host of students here at Alfred State College have alluded to thebenefits experienced in a laboratory setting where they are able to apply the theorypresented during lecture. This added dimension of application has been cited numeroustimes as the main reason for selecting an engineering technology curriculum over anengineering science curriculum. If the aforementioned can be agreed upon, thensimulating an industrial experience can also afford another opportunity to develop these
collectively supportfive four-year ET undergraduate programs:[1] ‚ Architectural Engineering Technology (AET) in the Architecture Department ‚ Audio (AuET), Electronic (EET) and Computer Engineering Technology (CET) in the Electrical & Computer Engineering Department ‚ Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET) in Mechanical Engineering Department Page 12.417.2The curriculum of each ET program is designed such that students must complete: ‚ One 4-credit lecture/laboratory course in a basic science elective ‚ Two 4-credit lecture/laboratory courses in algebra-based physics ‚ Four 3-credit All University Curriculum (AUC
Processing Industries. Williams holds an M. S. in Mechanical Engineering Technology from Purdue University and is certified as a Vibration Analyst Category III from the Vibration Institute.Joseph Kmec, Purdue University Joseph F. Kmec is currently Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering Technology at Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. His teaching areas of concentration are energy-based and include Applied Thermodynamics, Internal Combustion Engines, Motorsports, and Power Plant Systems. His recent activities involving student projects include engine simulation, power plant performance analysis, and nuclear technology. He may be reached at: kmecjf@purdue.edu
internet based and half laboratory based 4. The flexibilities afforded by an on-linecourse are well-suited to many students as they can be made to fit with their work schedules andfamily commitments. It is important to point out this portion is asynchronous, but is paced on aweek-by-week basis. Our college is trying to minimize student trips to campus. This hybridapproach fits well with that goal, and also reduces required carbon emissions inherently bydesign. The faculty, however, felt that a hands-on approach is too important to abandon. They are notwilling to relinquish personal contact, nor direct observations of the students and criticalinstructor-student interactions. Discussions about making “marathon” laboratory sessions once amonth
Paper ID #10552Low Power Energy Harvesting with a Thermoelectric Generator through anAir Conditioning CondenserDr. Faruk Yildiz, Sam Houston State UniversityMr. Keith L. Coogler Dr., Sam Houston State University Dr. Keith L. Coogler is an instructor of industrial technology at Sam Houston State University. He re- ceived a BS in Design & Development and holds a MA in Industrial Education and an Ed.D. in Higher Education from Texas A&M University – Commerce. His primary teaching area is Construction Manage- ment. Research interests include: automation, electronics, alternative energy, and ”green” construction
in the fields of CAD/CAM/CIM, Robotics and Automation, Machine vision, ISO 9000 and Lean Six Sigma. He has published several papers, in these areas, in various national & international conferences and journals. He has won several teaching awards including the recent academic excellence award, NISOD 2008, from the University of Texas at Austin.Karla Ramirez, University of Texas, Brownsville Page 14.698.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Implementing the use of Statistical Analysis Tools for the Optimization of Manufacturing Processes in the automotive
and Evaluate Programs. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Number 71, fall 1997, Jossey-Bass Publishers page 33-39 5. Palloff, Rena and Pratt, Keith. Building Online Learning Communities: Effective Strategies for the Virtual Classroom, 2nd Edition, , Jossey-Bass, 2007, pages 205-226.. 6. Flory, Isaac and Hackworth, John R., The Administration of Senior Design Projects in a Distance Learning Environment. ASEE 2005 Annual Conference Proceedings. 7. Hackworth, John R. and Jones, Richard L. Assessment Methods for Comparison of On-Campus and Distance-Learning Laboratory Courses in an Engineering Technology Program ASEE 2004 Annual Conference Proceedings