Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Programs and Courses Session 5

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Azim Houshyar, Western Michigan University; Bob White, Western Michigan University; Steven E. Butt, Western Michigan University; Tycho K. Fredericks, Western Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Engineering and Applied Sciences medical engineering initiative. Page 24.411.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Development and Implementation of the Industrial and Entrepreneurial Engineering Program at Western Michigan UniversityIntroductionThe industrial engineering (IE) degree was first offered at Western Michigan University in 1959.It was the only engineering program at the university until mechanical engineering and electricalengineering were added in the mid 1970’s. The IE program obtained EAC accreditation in 1979and has maintained

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Evaluating Student Behaviors and Attitudes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd M. Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Genisson Silva Coutinho, Purdue University, West Lafayette; M. D. Wilson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Stephen R Hoffmann, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

include an attitude theory based instrument forcollecting information entrepreneurship orientation, a multi-part socio economic statusinstrument, and several additional questions developed by the authors to collect information toexplore ties between demographic and attitude measures of entrepreneurship.Instrument – Entrepreneurship ComponentThe attitude theory component, consisting of 75 Likert-type items, is a modified version of theEntrepreneurial Attitudes and Orientation (EAO) instrument originally developed by Robinson etal16. This instrument, developed in the early 1990’s, used two discrete populations: a populationof entrepreneurs and a population of non-entrepreneurs. The goal of the instrument is toestablish an attitude theory based

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karl D. Schubert FIET, University of Arkansas; Leslie Bartsch Massey, University of Arkansas; Alan E. Ellstrand, University of Arkansas

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

literature, and the media.Yet, once past the title and initial discussion, the focus invariably is on entrepreneurship – notinnovation. This focus on entrepreneurship is fueled by the excitement of “the start-upexperience,” the aura of its founders as entrepreneurs, and the community for economicdevelopment. “Entrepreneurship leverages innovation to create value” [10] and “entrepreneursneed to search purposely for the sources of innovation” [11] to be successful. Whereas“[i]nnovation – or practical creativity – is mainly about making new ideas useful [and] aninnovator…solve[s] old problems with new ideas…or solve[s] new problems with old ideas usedin radically different ways.” [12] Innovation is possible without entrepreneurship

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University; Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University; Thomas A. Litzinger, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3): 223-231. 3. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, H. J., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 4. Bender, D. D., & Weimer, M. (2005). The phenomenology of change: How do individual faculty manage the instructional change process? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec. 5. Borrego, M., Froyd, J. E., & Hall, T. S. (2010). Diffusion of engineering education innovations: A survey of

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 3

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Prateek Shekhar, University of Michigan; Aileen Huang-Saad, University of Michigan

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

starting acompany in their assessment process. Such assessment results will help practitionersbetter design course content and pedagogy to meet the desired learning outcomes, andalso simultaneously provide the research community with data to identify whichconceptualizations or constituent constructs of EM are most frequently targeted in currentengineering entrepreneurship programs.AcknowledgementsThis work is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation through grant number1531533. The opinions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent theNational Science Foundation. 8References[1] N. Duval-Couetil, M. Ladisch, and S. Yi, “Discovery to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Teaming and Collaboration

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

David Pistrui, Acumen Dynamics, LLC; John K. Layer, University of Evansville; Sandra L. Dietrich, Eastern Michigan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. The Behavior latent variable is defined by the DISC instrument as a measurement model,where the four manifest variables Dominance (D), Influence (I), Steadiness (S), and Compliance(C) are depicted in Figure 3 [18] [19]. D I BEHAVIOR S C Figure 3. Hypothesized KEEN-TTI DISC Measurement ModelIn a similar fashion the Motivation and Skills latent variables are described by specific manifestvariables derived from TTI questionnaire items. The Motivation latent model is described by sixmanifest variables: Theoretical (TH), Aesthetic (AE

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Epicenter Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheri Sheppard, Stanford University; Shannon Gilmartin, Stanford University; Helen L. Chen, Stanford University; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Angela Shartrand, VentureWell; Laurie Moore, National Center for Engineering Pathways to Innovation (Epicenter); Emanuel Costache, SageFox Consulting Group; Andreea Mihaela Fintoc; Qu Jin, Stanford University; Calvin Ling, Stanford University; Florian Michael Lintl, Stanford University; Leticia C. Britos Cavagnaro, Stanford University; Humera Fasihuddin, VentureWell; Anna K Breed

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Program Development & Desired Outcomes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sergio William Sedas, Tecnológico de Monterrey

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

enhance theseintrinsic motivators.2.2 Resiliency5Globalization, competition and existing dynamic market conditions require engineers toconstantly innovate, to work and adapt under uncertain conditions and to quickly learn andrecover from mistakes and fails. This requires a high level of “resiliency” defined as theability to overcome and rise above adversity and difficult situations. Page 26.89.3Resiliency describes one´s ability to move forward with optimism and self-confidence evenwhen we are immersed in adversity. It is a mental state motivated by our thoughts, which arein part formulated by our success and our interpretations of past and current

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Research Technical Session 7

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jessica Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Kathryn Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Daniel Michael Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University and Central Queensland University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

-course mod- ule focused on creativity and problem solving leadership and is currently developing a new methodology for cognition-based design. She is one of three instructors for Penn State’s Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on Creativity, Innovation, and Change, and she is the founding director of the Problem Solving Research Group, whose 50+ collaborating members include faculty and students from several universities, as well as industrial representatives, military leaders, and corporate consultants.Dr. Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette S¸enay Purzer an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering Education and is the Director of As- sessment Research for the Institute for P-12 Engineering

Conference Session

Assessing Entrepreneurship and Innovation

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Todd M. Fernandez, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

reliability; and further work that needs to be undertaken to create aninstrument able to guide and inform the teaching of effectuation in the classroom.Theoretical frameworkThe theory of effectuation was first proposed by Sarasvathy in the early 2000’s as an explanationfor how expert entrepreneurs act when faced with decisions at the early stage of venture creation1,15 . The work takes a grounded theory approach to unpacking the entrepreneurial behaviortermed ‘intuitive’ by Knight13 in 1921. The intuition that Knight names, and which Sarasvathyexplains, describes the behavior of individuals when faced with highly uncertain situations whereit is impossible to make meaningful calculations of risk 13. Sarasvathy proposed that expertentrepreneurs

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Creativity and Innovation

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sine Celik, Aalto University; Senni Kirjavainen, Aalto University; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University Design Factory

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

security challenge. This group deeply elaborated on privacy concernsalready in their first report and used the privacy aspect as a starting point for ideatingsolutions for their challenge: “It is important to find a solution for our challenge as IoT devices are getting more common everyday and it is very likely that soon everyone is an IoT user. Because of this privacy will be an issue, since IoT is important as it guarantees equality and freedom. If IoT devices are not secured, soon everyone will have spying devices at home and the data these devices collect can be used against their users.” (group E, first report)A further four groups (L, N, R, S) increasingly raised privacy concerns. Their reports

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Antti Oskari Surma-Aho, Aalto University; Tua A. Björklund, Aalto University; Katja Holtta-Otto, Aalto University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Differences on Student Innovation Capabilities,” in ASME International Design and Engineering Technical Conferences, 2014.[3] T. C. Kershaw et al., “A Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Examination of the Development of Innovation Capability in Undergraduate Engineering Students,” in Volume 3: 17th International Conference on Advanced Vehicle Technologies; 12th International Conference on Design Education; 8th Frontiers in Biomedical Devices, 2015, p. V003T04A008.[4] J. Walther, S. E. Miller, and N. W. Sochacka, “A Model of Empathy in Engineering as a Core Skill, Practice Orientation, and Professional Way of Being,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 123–148, 2017.[5] M. Kouprie and F. S. Visser, “A framework for empathy

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Epicenter Session

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gregory Wilson II, University of Georgia

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

learned in their studies, altered theirview of other disciplines, and gave them the confidence to work on business ideas (new and old)after the event. While many graduates from fields considered a part of the creative class won’tstart their own businesses, the development of an entrepreneurship mindset and use of theassociated tools will be essential as they solve the grand challenges of society. Page 26.504.24ReferencesAkker, J. Van den, Koeno, G., Mckenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational design research. London  ; New York  : Routledge, 2006.Barab, S., & Duffy, T. (2012). From Practice Fields to Communities of Practice. In

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Evaluating Student Behaviors and Attitudes

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Daniel M. Ferguson, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Kathryn W. Jablokow, Pennsylvania State University, Great Valley; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University; Senay Purzer, Purdue University, West Lafayette; Jessica Dolores Menold, Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

engineers. After interviewing 53 engineering innovators abouttheir experiences as an innovator and qualitatively analyzing the interview data, weidentified twenty unique characteristics of engineers who had demonstratedextraordinary innovative behavior (Ferguson D., 2013). This finding was corroborated bya separate focus group study (Ferguson D. et al., 2014). We then initiated a modifiedDelphi study with 150 engineering innovators drawn from academic, corporate, andentrepreneurial organizations to examine the complex constructs associated withengineering (Ferguson D, Purzer S, Ohland M, Jablokow K, & Menold J, 2014). Delphistudy participants were nominated as extraordinary engineering innovators from large,medium and small firms; from many

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: Entrepreneurship and IP

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Thomas M. Katona, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo; Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park; Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Poly’s Orfalea College of Business and Penn State’s Engineering Library,Mark Bieraugel and Paul McMonigle, respectively, for their assistance refining the literaturesearching methodology for this paper.References:Ashford SJ, Tsui AS. 1991. Self‐regulation for managerial effectiveness: the role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal 34( 2): 251– 280.Atkins, L., Martinez-Moreno, J. E., Patil, L., Andrews, K. J., Wu, M. S., Dutta, D., Hug, B. & Bresler, L. (2015). Fostering innovative skills within the classroom: A qualitative analysis from interviews with 60 innovators. Proceedings of the 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA.Author, 2018. Blinded for review.Bernal, A., Brackin

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Samarth Gupta, Purdue University; Greg J. Strimel, Purdue Polytechnic Institute

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

/Publications/Reports/134539.aspx.3. National Academies Press. Educate to innovate: Factors that influence innovation. (2015). Available at: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/21698/educate-to-innovate-factors-that-influence- innovation-based-on-input.4. Guerra, R. C. C., Smith, K. A., McKenna, A. F., Swan, C., Korte, R., Jordan, S, & MacNeal, R. Innovation corps for learning: Evidence-based entrepreneurship to improve (STEM) education. Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) Conf. Proc. 1-5 (2014).5. Blank, S. Embrace failure to start up success. Nature. 477(7363), 133 (2011).6. Blank, S. Innovation corps: A review of a new national science foundation program to leverage research investments. (2012).7. National Science Foundation. NSF fosters

Conference Session

Post BS Entrepreneurship Education Needs

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew Borchers, Kettering University; Sung Hee Park, Kettering University; Michael Harris, Kettering University; William Riffe, Kettering University; Massoud Tavakoli, Kettering University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, journals and funded projects. Engineering curricula are crowded, however, and leave little room for new courses. Beginning with the “writing across the curriculum” movement in the 1980’s, the literature reveals that many disciplines have mounted “across the curriculum” movements. These include writing, mathematics, critical thinking, citizenship, ethics and other fields. Given crowded engineering curricula, an “across the curriculum” approach is a logical means to address the need to add entrepreneurial thinking without adding additional courses. Measurement tools are a critical requirement to assess the efficacy or any curriculum intervention. This is especially true when dealing with a new and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Design

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenneth Cook, Lawrence Tech University; Jerry Cuper, Lawrence Tech University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

from different operating divisions that have technical or businessissues. They are brought together to develop new or innovative products to make their divisionssustainable and profitable. It is very important to establish the entrepreneurial mindset by theCEO/professor (CEO/P) that fosters teamwork with a free spirit of brainstorming. This structureprovides real-world situations as in industry. The CEO/P acts as a mentor who providesencouragement and instills confidence that the employees/students (E/S) can deliver the producton time while meeting the project objectives.4BrainstormingThe E/S brainstorm as a group over several meetings and their ideas are recorded. To helpdevelop creativity, the CEO/P uses several methods such as asking E/S to

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 8

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Pradeep Kashinath Waychal, Western Michigan University; Vinit Kishor Agham; Vediya Sitaram Raghuvanshi, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur; Jayantrao Bhaurao Patil, R. C. Patel Institute of Technology, Shirpur; Pramod Jagan Deore

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

learningmathematics and English on the cost effective 25 USD ‘Akash’ tablets. We explained the following four principles of developing innovative entrepreneurialcompetencies [13]; (a) The competencies can be developed, b) Diversity is the key, c) Start bychoosing a challenge, d) RBIS (Research-Based Instructional Strategies) catalyze development ofthe competencies. In the rest of the document, entrepreneurship would mean innovative entrepreneurship,wherein one solves problem(s) in an innovative way and makes cost-effective and ethicalsolutions available to people who are facing the problem(s). We then identified broad challenge areas such as education, health, energy, security,efficient enterprises, urban infrastructure, environment, and

Conference Session

Assessment

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jacob Dean Wheadon, Purdue University; Nathalie Duval-Couetil, Purdue University, West Lafayette

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

Economics, 18(1/3), 13–40.Barringer, B. R. (2009). Preparing Effective Business Plans: An Entrepreneurial Approach. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Barringer, B. R., & Ireland, R. D. (2010). Entrepreneurship: Successfully Launching New Ventures. Boston: Prentice Hall.Blank, S., & Dorf, B. (2012). The Startup Owner’s Manual: The Step-By-Step Guide for Building a Great Company. K & S Ranch.Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longman and Green.Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Alexandra Mary Jackson, Rowan University; Samantha Resnick, Rowan University; Rebecca Hansson, Rowan University; Cheryl A. Bodnar, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

entrepreneurs' definitions, but mentioned only afew times throughout student interviews, for example, Participant 42 stated; "Entrepreneurialmindset is really just creating a new form of mental habits that will allow you to see the biggerpicture of things to make connections and values through what your work is." However, it seemsthat some of the more frequent codes such as Innovation and Business Skills were nothighlighted by entrepreneurs in previous studies. This could be due to students' lack ofexperience in the field and the fact that students are only learning about entrepreneurial mindsetin the classroom, as opposed to entrepreneurs who have real world experience with the benefitsof EM.Faculty in Zappe et al.’s study said that they believe that

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship Teaming and Collaboration

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrew L Gerhart, Lawrence Technological University; Donald D. Carpenter, Lawrence Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

partnered with The Henry Ford, both of which are located in the Detroitmetro area. As a result, Lawrence Tech‟s camp was focused on exploring creativity, innovation,and ingenuity as it relates to the American experience and manufacturing. In subsequentsummers, Boston University and St. Louis University will host summer enrichment opportunities Page 25.364.3in their respective metro areas. (Themes, details, and objectives for the Boston and St. Louiscamps had not been finalized by the time of publication of this paper.)2. Lawrence Tech Summer Enrichment ProgramThe Detroit metro area is well known as being the world‟s automotive industry capital and

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 4

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Erin A. Henslee, Wake Forest University; Lauren Lowman, Wake Forest University; Michael D. Gross, Wake Forest University; Anita K. McCauley, Wake Forest University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

collection. Through GORP, the observer can select codes forobserved classroom activity for both the instructor(s) and students. Observations are coded in 2-minute intervals until the class session is over. If the observer makes a mistake, they can note itduring the next interval, and adjust the data accordingly by hand, after class. Data isautomatically analyzed in GORP and can be exported to a spreadsheet for further analysis.The COPUS evaluation process was also part of the development of this Work-in-Progress. Wefollowed the clustering convention put forth by Stains et al. [86] in order to better capture thebroader types of instructor and student behaviors that we were interested in at this stage in thestudy -- who's talking, who's working, who's

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Innovation Beyond the Classroom

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alexander Joseph Zorychta, University of Virginia; Elizabeth P. Pyle MBA, University of Virginia

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, theprograms available to students clearly developed the skills and knowledge necessary for venturecreation. There seemed to be a gap between the cultivation of skills and knowledge for newventure creation and the engagement of students in actual new venture creation.Looking more broadly, this phenomenon does not seem to be limited to the University ofVirginia. According to data, the number of entrepreneurship programs offered at institutions ofhigher education has been skyrocketing since the 1970’s [1–3]. However, there has beeninsufficient evidence to support that an increase in traditional curricular entrepreneurshipeducation leads to an increase in venture creation [4,5]. As of 2012, approximately 2,100colleges and universities in the United

Conference Session

Leadership and Strategic Planning

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Keynton, University of Louisville; James Fiet, University of Louisville; Pankaj Patel, Ball State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

. REFERENCES 1. Fiet, J.O. 1996. The informational basis of entrepreneurial discovery. Small Business Economics, 8: 419-430. 2. Demsetz, H. 1983. The neglect of the entrepreneur. In Joshua Ronen (Ed.), Entrepreneurship. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books. 3. Kirzner, I. (1997) “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach.” Journal of Economic Literature 35: 60–85. 4. Kaish, S. and B. Gilad. 1991. Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: Sources, interests, general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6: 45-61. 5. Langlois, R. N. (1994), ‘Risk and uncertainty’, in The Elgar Companion to AustrianEconomics, edited by P. Boettke, Cheltenham

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Rachana Ashok Gupta, North Carolina State University at Raleigh; Marshall Brain, North Carolina State University at Raleigh

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

collaboration, and (v) the following steps if they want to participate. Once interestedEEP teams approach the instructors, and then the teams are selected as potential sponsors basedon three primary criteria:(1) Need of the ECE skills to create the product for the EEP team’s product idea.(2) Scope of work and technical feasibility for ECE SD team to finish in one year,(3) Quality of EEP team’s market & customer study and business plan.Selecting the ECE team as design and implementation engineers (Second semester)Selected EEP team/s are invited to participate in the “pitch your project” event with all otherexternal sponsors in the following spring semester to the ECE SD class. ECE SD team membersare provided information about the EEP team (but not

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Innovation in First-Year Programs

Collection

2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

William A. Kline, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; William D. Schindel, ICTT System Sciences; Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University; Ashley Bernal, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Cory Hixson, Rowan University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, undergraduate design canvas can improve both student learningand successful product design.Another objective of the work is to develop a “meta-canvas” approach that is comprehensive andrigorous, yet customizable, such that faculty can develop a canvas to suit their specific course(s).Customizability for different faculty approaches is vital, but an underlying metamodel used alsohelps make it clear where the boundaries to customizability lie. Existing canvases, with theirinherent complexity, may be better suited to more advanced courses, and a customizable canvasapproach may broaden the impact of the canvas concept from first-year design through capstonedesign and beyond. Faculty may utilize different approaches or have different learning

Conference Session

ENT Division Technical Session: EM Across the Curriculum I

Collection

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Seyed Mohammad Seyed Ardakani, Ohio Northern University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

plan(s) and elevations of their building as well as the framing plan. Appendix 5 shows an example of the building layout. The evaluation rubric for the layout is shown in Table 2. 72% of students scored at least 90%, 16% between 75% and 90%, and 6% between 60% and 75% as well as below 60%.3- Design Handbook- 60%: Each member must submit a design handbook that includes hand calculations and/or software results of their building. The evaluation rubrics for the design handbook is shown in Table 2. 26% scored at least 90%, 42% scored 75% to 90%, 26% between 60% and 75%, and 6% below 60%.4- Written proposal- 5%: problem description, constraints, alternative solutions, analysis and design of each solution including hand calculations or

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Sandra Furnbach Clavijo PE P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Kishore Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

el ut od O M s es on

Conference Session

Entrepreneurship and Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access

Authors

Meg West, Ohio State University; Meagan Eleanor Ita, Ohio State University; Laine Rumreich, Ohio State University; Rachel Louis Kajfez, Ohio State University; Krista M. Kecskemety, Ohio State University

Tagged Divisions

Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation

, “Entrepreneurship Education, and Training: A Survey of Literature,” Life Science Journal, vol. 11, no. 1s, 2014. 2. The Kern Family Foundation, “Engineering Unleashed,” https://engineeringunleashed.com/, 2021, (accessed January 2021). 3. A. R. Peterfreund, E. Costache, H. L. Chen, S. K. Gilmartin, and S. Sheppard, “Infusing innovation and entrepreneurship into engineering education: Looking for change as seen by ASEE Members,” Proceedings of the 2016 ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, June 2016. 4. W. F. Massy, T.A. Sullivan, and C. Mackie, “Improving measurement of productivity in higher education,” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, vol. 45, no. 1, 15–23, 2013. 5. S. R. Brunhaver, J. M. Bekki, A. R