: Framed within Latino critical race theory. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 33(8), 810-823.Coso-Strong, A., Kendall, M. R., Henderson, G., & Basalo, I. (2019, June). Impact of Faculty Development Workshops on Instructional Faculty at Hispanic-serving Institutions. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Coso-Strong, A. C., Kendall, M. R., & Henderson, G. (2022). Voices of Engineering Faculty at the Margins, Handbook of STEM Faculty Development, 15.Crisp, G., Doran, E., Carales, V. D., & Potts, C. (2020). Disrupting the dominant discourse: Exploring the mentoring experiences of Latinx community college students. Journal for the Study of Postsecondary and Tertiary
, “Collaborative research: Supporting agency among early career engineering education faculty in diverse institutional contexts: Developing a framework for faculty agency,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition 2019, American Society for Engineering Education, 2019. Accessed: Feb. 08, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10148508[30] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis,” Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 589–597, Aug. 2019.[31] Consumer Reports, “Costs of ADHD Tests,” Jul-2010.
%, respectively (ASEE,2019). The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2019) projected higher job growth for computationalroles (12%) compared to mechanical, electrical, and computer hardware engineering (4-6%).Reflecting this demand, computer science and computer engineering faculty emerged with thehighest salaries in academia, surpassing their engineering counterparts (ASEE, 2022).These disciplinary distinctions permeate beyond academic and professional spheres, influencingsocialization, enrollment, and persistence, and carrying significant implications forunderrepresented groups. Hocker and colleagues (2019) pinpoint challenges in academiacontributing to a noteworthy doctoral dropout rate in engineering, particularly impacting womenand URMs. The prevalence
effective college teacher. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Institutional Data as Motivation for Course-Level Change in EngineeringIntroduction and BackgroundFor decades, studies have called for attention to recruiting and retaining a diverse studentpopulation in STEM fields and increasing the numbers of STEM graduates [1, 2]. Multiplestudies have documented an “achievement gap” in terms of success for under-representedminorities (URM) [3] and first-generation college students [4], and also provide a multitude ofsuggestions for better supporting these students at the institutional and classroom levels [3, 5].In 2019, ASEE
taxonomy on which our work in thispaper is based. We would also like to thank Dr. Chelsea Andrews at the Tufts Center forEngineering Education and Outreach (CEEO) who helped co-create the disability and designdiscussion exercise with Dr. Desen Ozkan, one of the authors of this paper. Additionally, wethank Dr. Ethan Danahy and Dr. Jenn Cross for implementing this discussion exercise in theirfirst-year engineering computation classes.ReferencesAmerican Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). (2016). Engineering by the Numbers: ASEE Retention and Time-to-Graduation Benchmarks for Undergraduate EngineeringAndrews, C., & Upadhya, R., K. (2019). Lessons from the Long Sixties for Organizing in Tech. Science for the People. 22(1). https
scientists,” Sci. Educ., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 180– 192, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2- X.[8] L. Doyle and T. L. Nilsson, “Flipping the classroom: Do student learning gains and perceptions vary based on gender?,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa Bay, FL, 2019.[9] J. D. Stolk, Y. V. Zastavkerq, and M. D. Gross, “Gender, motiviation, and pedagogy in the STEM classroom: A quantitative characterization,” presented at the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT, 2018.[10] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, “Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesian, gay, and bisexual students
Engineers-Year Four. 2019 American Society forEngineering Education Annual Conference Proceedings.[6] Olson, R., & Acero, A. (2018). Introducing changemaking engineering into an OperationsResearch course: Some unexpected results. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.[7] Przestrzelski, B., Reddy, E., & Lord, S. M. (2018). Integrating Social with Technical:” Bringin your Trash module for a Materials Science Class. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings.[8] Reddy, E., Przestrzelski, B., Lord, S. M., & Khalil, I. (2018). Introducing social relevanceand global context into the introduction to heat transfer course. ASEE Annual ConferenceProceedings.[9] Roberts, C. A., Olson, R., Lord, S. M., Camacho, M. M., Huang, M. Z., & Perry, L. A. (2017
, “Balancing engineering and religious identities,” in 2016 IEEE Frontiers inEducation Conference (FIE), Oct. 2016, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2016.7757555.[33] G. G. Gonzales, “Embodied Resistance: Multiracial Identity, Gender, and the Body,” SocialSciences, vol. 8, no. 8, p. 221, Jul. 2019, doi: 10.3390/socsci8080221.[34] M. Jennings, R. Roscoe, N. Kellam, and S. Jayasuriya, “A Review of the State ofLGBTQIA+ Student Research in STEM and Engineering Education,” in 2020 ASEE VirtualAnnual Conference Content Access Proceedings, Virtual On line: ASEE Conferences, Jun.2020, p. 34045. doi: 10.18260/1-2--34045.[35] K. Kaufman-Ortiz and H. Rodriguez-Simmonds, “Where are the Gays? A SystematizedLiterature Review of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and
. “’I didn't know what antiBlackness was until I got here’: The unmet needs of Black students at Hispanic-ServingInstitutions,” Urban Education, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 330-357, 2021.https://doi.org/10.1177/004208592110449489[22] P. K. Cornejo and K. Orner. (2019, June). “Life cycle thinking and engineering indeveloping communities: Addressing international sustainability challenges in the classroom,” in2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, FL (USA), June 2019.https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33065[23] H. Yi. “Robotics and kinetic design for underrepresented minority (URM) students inbuilding education: Challenges and opportunities,” Computer Applications in EngineeringEducation, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 351-370, 2019.[24] N. P. Rentsch and
show that BIPOC students had an immediate increase in their withdraw rates during COVID, depicted in Figure 1, while White students had a decrease in their withdraw rates, depicted in Figure 2. This trend is particularly alarming because historically before COVID, BIPOC withdraw rates were lower than White students withdraw rates. However, during COVID, BIPOC students withdraw rates were higher than White students. Further investigation revealed that when comparing withdrawn students by race, student classification, and residential status pre-COVID (Spring 2017-Fall 2019) and during COVID (Spring 2020-Spring 2022), BIPOC Sophomores and BIPOC residential student populations saw large proportional increases in total number of withdrawn
. DePaola, "Revolutionizing Transfer: A Novel and Holistic Programmatic Model that Eliminates Barriers to Student Success," in Proceeding of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (accepted for publication)., 2021.[34] D. Jenkins, H. Lahr, A. E. Brown and A. Mazzariello, "Redesigning Your College Through Guided Pathways: Lessons on Managing Whole-College Reform From the AACC Pathways Project," Community College Research Center, New York, 2019.[35] T. Bailey, S. S. Jaggars and D. Jenkins, "What we know about guided pathways," Community College Research Center, New York, 2015.[36] E. R. Felix and M. F. Castro, "Planning as strategy for improving Black and Latinx student equity: Lessons from nine California community
the numbers,” Washington, D.C., 2019.[3] American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE), “Profiles of engineering and engineering technology by the numbers,” Washington, D.C., 2021.[4] U.S. Census Bureau, “STEM Majors Earned More Than Other STEM Workers,” Census.gov, 2021. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/06/does-majoring-in-stem- lead-to-stem-job-after-graduation.html (accessed Jan. 05, 2022).[5] S. Burke and K. M. Collins, “Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills,” Women in management review, 2001.[6] B. J. Avolio, B. M. Bass, and D. I. Jung, “Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership,” Journal of occupational
their workthat impinge on self-/advocacy in engineering.References [1] I. Villanueva, R. A. Revelo, and J. A. Mejia, “Professional development of Latinx engineers on hidden curriculum: An exploratory study,” in IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2019, pp. 1–5. Accessed: Sep. 07, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9028632/?casa_token=IlEutod 0MsYAAAAA:56av6jlwQiST1cOOXdRMfi6yjeyFAjDszVw6TwcC1ruk5FSeOS dB7wa_8Ga_3_3DMNhoRj5h [2] V. Sellers and I. Villanueva Alarcón, “What strategies do diverse women in engineering use to cope with situational hidden curriculum?,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, 2021. [Online
. Frierson, Eds., Emerald Publishing Limited,2019, pp. 153-181.[23] T.L. Skipper. What makes the first-year seminar high impact? An exploration of effectiveeducational practices. (Research Reports No. 7). Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina,National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience & Students in Transition, 2014.[24] Z. S. Wilson-Kennedy, G. S. Byrd, et al. (eds). Broadening Participation in STEM (vol. 22):Effective Methods, Practices, and Programs, Emerald Publishing Limited, 2019. ASEE 2021[25] S. I. Jabar and & P. R. Albion, “Assessing the reliability of merging Chickering andGamson’s several principles for good practice with Merril’s different levels of instructionalstrategy
health, safety, and welfare even though they are truly qualified. Actions to addressall three of these issues are discussed and progress towards the goal of inclusiveness for adiverse population of ET grads are presented.Background Information - Diversity of Engineering and ETAccording to the National Center for Education Statistics 2019/20 data [1] the diversityamong the nation’s 2-yr institutions is higher than in 4-yr institutions. For example,54.7% of the STEM associate degree graduates were White as compared to the 59.8% ofbachelor degree graduates. Associate degrees in ET prepare graduates for careers wherethey are commonly referred to as technicians. Students also attend 2-yr institutionssometimes earning pre-engineering degrees intended
engineering design,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo. Conf. Proc., 2013.[3] C. Garibay and R. M. Teasdale, “Equity and Evaluation in Informal STEM Education,” New Dir. Eval., vol. 2019, no. 161, pp. 87–106, 2019.[4] B. Williams, J. Figueiredo, and J. Trevelyan, Engineering Practice in a Global Context. 2013.[5] R. E. Dunlap and K. D. Van Liere, “The ‘new environmental paradigm,’” J. Environ. Educ., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 10–19, 1978.[6] A. Byars-Winston, “Toward a framework for multicultural STEM-focused career interventions,” Career Dev. Q., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 340–357, 2014.[7] C. Kivunja and A. B. Kuyini, “Understanding and Applying Research Paradigms in Educational Contexts,” Int. J. High. Educ., vol. 6, no. 5, p
Design for Learning (UDL) framework,” in 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Covington, KY, USA, Oct. 2019, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028693.[A5] C. C. Hain, W. C. Turek, A. E. Zaghi, and A. Hain, “Board # 156 : Experiences of Pre- College Teachers Working with Undergraduate Engineering Students with ADHD in Research Laboratories,” presented at the 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Columbus, Ohio, Columbus, Ohio: ASEE Conferences, Jun. 2017. doi: 10.18260/1-2-- 27786.[A6] M. Chrysochoou et al., “Redesigning Engineering Education for Neurodiversity: New Standards for Inclusive Courses,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference, ASEE Conferences, Jul. 2021.[A7] A
Hidden Factors that Could Compromise Equitable and Effective Engineering Education,” in 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), Oct. 2018, pp. 1–3. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2018.8659294.[16] B. A. Burt, A. McKen, J. Burkhart, J. Hormell, and A. Knight, “Black Men in Engineering Graduate Education: Experiencing Racial Microaggressions within the Advisor–Advisee Relationship,” Journal of Negro Education, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 493–508, 2019.[17] S. Claussen, J. Y. Tsai, K. Johnson, J. Blacklock, and J. A. Leydens, “Exploring the Nexus Between Student’s Perceptions of Sociotechnical Thinking and Construction of their Engineering Identities,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021
., & Lanning, R. (2019, June). Engineering students’ perceptions of belongingness in civil engineering. In 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.Cech, E. A. (2023). Engineering ableism: The exclusion and devaluation of engineering students and professionals with physical disabilities and chronic and mental illness. Journal of Engineering Education, 112(2), 462-487.Clouder, L., Karakus, M., Cinotti, A., Ferreyra, M. V., Fierros, G. A., & Rojo, P. (2020). Neurodiversity in higher education: A narrative synthesis. Higher Education, 80(4), 757- 778.Coghill, E. M. (2020). An Introduction to Neurodiversity. Supporting Neurodiverse College Student Success: A Guide for Librarians, Student Support
Association for the Advancement of Science, pp. 1101– 1102, 15-Sep-2017.[14] K. M. DeGoede, B. Read-Daily, and J. C. B. Abreu, “GIFTS: Strengthening Inclusive Group Dynamics,” Jul. 2019.[15] S. Lezotte, H. Hartman, S. Farrell, and T. R. Forin, “Disability and Engineering : A Case of ” Othering ”? Disability and Engineering : A Case of ‘ Othering ’?,” ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., 2014.[16] R. M. Johnson, M. K. Bothwell, D. Montfort, and K. Furman, “Measuring the conceptualization of oppression and privilege,” in CoNECD 2019 - Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity, 2019.[17] R. Walton, K. R. Moore, and N. N. Jones, Technical Communication After the Social Justice Turn: Building Coalit
generate anawareness among faculty of the power they possess and the impact of their work, not only inresearch settings, but in the classroom, too.References[1] S. Ambrose and M. Norman, “Preparing engineering faculty as educators.,” Natl. Acad. Eng., vol. 36, no. 2, p. 25, 2006.[2] S. Baum and M. McPherson, “Improving teaching: Strengthening the college learning experience,” Daedalus, vol. 148, no. 4, pp. 5–13, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1162/daed_e_01757.[3] D. M. Riley, V. Henry, and L. C. Leighton, “What makes faculty adopt or resist change in engineering education?,” presented at the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2013, p. 23.1367.1-23.1367.20. Accessed: Jan. 16, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org
Critical Race Perspective. International Journal of Advanced Counselling, 43(3), 283-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447- 021-09437-xBork, S. J., & Mondisa, J. L. (2022). Engineering graduate students’ mental health: A scoping literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 111(3), 665-702.Bork, S. J., Tuladhar, A., & Mondisa, J. (2019, June). Board 134: Methods for Conducting a Scoping Literature Review on Engineering Graduate Student Mental Health (Work in Progress). Paper presented at 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Tampa, Florida. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2—32242Costa, A. C. D. S., Menon, V., Phadke, R., Dapke, K., Miranda, A. V., Ahmad, S., Essar, M. Y., & Hashim, H. T
violations. She has published several papers, including ”Ch˘osunjok as a Marginalized Diaspora in South Korea” (The Taiwanese Political Science Review, 2019) and ”Politics of Memory in East Asia and Democratization of Memory in the Post-Cold War Era: Do the Wartime Memories of Jeju, Okinawa, and Nanjing Compete?” (Discourse 201, 2017, written in Korean).Dr. Davis Chacon-Hurtado, University of Connecticut Davis Chacon-Hurtado, Ph.D.,is an Assistant Research Professor at UConn. He co-directs the Engineering for Human Rights Initiative, which is a collaboration between UConn’s Office of the Vice Provost for Research, the College of Engineering, and the Human Rights Institute, to promote and advance interdisciplinary
Abstract In order to inform a discussion of silenced communities within systemic processes, we examine the ASEE Diversity Recognition Program (ADRP) as a step towards amplifying re- flexive and critical activities already occurring within ASEE. In light of recent concern over the ADRP as a means of disrupting minority marginalization in Engineering Education1 , we reflect on the origins of the program as well as how to proactively shift the program’s cultural context to one of greater criticality about Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in engineering, broadly. To investigate this more deeply, our research questions for this study were: What have other organizations used to anoint2 member
construction decision mak- ing, sustainable design and construction, applications of machine learning and AI in construction, and engineering education. Dr. Uddin is also dedicated to serve his profession and the community. He is a member of ASEE, ASCE, TRB and CRC, and serves as the VP of the ASCE Tennessee Section and Sec- retary for the ASCE Holston branch. Dr. Uddin is active with ASEE engineering technology division and served as ETD program chair for CIEC in 2017 and 2018. Dr. Uddin also served as the Editor-in-Chief for Journal of Engineering Technology from 2019 to 2021. Dr. Uddin received outstanding researcher award, outstanding service award and sustainability leadership award from his college.Dr. Keith V
2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Jun. 2011, p. 22.684.1-22.684.21. Accessed: May 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/exploding-pipelines-mythological- metaphors-structuring-diversity-oriented-engineering-education-research-agendas[4] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Layton, and M. M. Camacho, “Beyond pipeline and pathways: Ecosystem metrics,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 32– 56, 2019, doi: 10.1002/jee.20250.[5] S. Lancaster, Connect! Blink Publishing, 2022.[6] A. L. Pawley, “Universalized Narratives: Patterns in How Faculty Members Define ‘Engineering,’” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 309–319, 2009, doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2009.tb01029.x
/0162243913504305Cech, E. A., & Rothwell, W. R. (2018). LGBTQ Inequality in Engineering Education. Journal of Engineering Education, 107(4), 583–610. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20239Cech, E. A., Waidzunas, T., & Farrell, S. (2017). The inequality of LGBTQ students in U.S. engineering education: Report on a study of eight engineering programs. Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE).Cech, E. A., & Waidzunas, T. J. (2011). Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: The experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students. Engineering Studies, 3(March1). https://doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.545065Cieminski, M. (2019). Queer(y)-ing technical practice: Queer experiences in student theater
in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director of the Integrated Design Engineering (IDE) program. The IDE program hosts a BS degree in IDE accredited by the ABET EAC under the general criteria and a new PhD degree in Engineering Education. Bielefeldt is a Fellow of the ASEE and a licensed P.E. in Colorado. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Paint Bucket Model of Dis/ability in STEM Higher Education: Axioms 1-3AbstractDis/ability is a complex, evolving, and nuanced concept. Recognizing the absence of a cleardefinition of dis/ability, the first author proposed a “paint bucket dis/ability
M.S. in Industrial Engineering, and a Ph.D. in Engineering from the University of Arkansas. His research interest includes decision quality, resilient design, set-based design, engineering and project management, and engineering education. During his time at the University of Arkansas, Eric has served as Principal Investigator, Co-Principal Investigator, or Senior Personnel on over 40 research projects totaling over $6.6 Million, which produced over 50 publications (journal articles, book chapters, conference proceedings, newsletters, and technical reports). He is an active member of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) and International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE) where he has served in
. Didion, N. L. Fortenberry, and E. Cady, Colloquy on Minority Males in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. 2012, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.[3] Y. E. Pearson, Inclusion, Diversity Now Factor Into Accreditation Standards. PE Magazine, 2019.[4] NSPE Adopts New Policy on Diversity. 2017: NSPE Today.[5] Transforming Undergraduate Education in Engineering Phase III: Voices on Women's Participation and Retention. 2017.[6] R. Reisberg, The University Experience: Retention to Degree, in ASEE-TUEE-WIE Discussion Starter. 2015, ASEE.[7] C. Corbett, and C. Hill, Solving the Equation: The Variables for Women's Success in Engineering and Computing. 2015: AAUW[8] L. L. Long III, T. S