) advancing engineering design research by integrating new theoretical or analytical frameworks (e.g., from data science or complexity science) and (3) conducting design-based research to develop scaffolding tools for supporting the learning of complex skills like design. He is the Division Chair Elect for the Design in Engineering Education Division for the 2023 ASEE conference.Dr. Jessica E S Swenson, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York Jessica Swenson is an Assistant Professor at the University at Buffalo. She was awarded her doctorate and masters from Tufts University in mechanical engineering and STEM education respectively, and completed postdoctoral work at the University of Michigan. Her current
humanistic approach to engineering education, it is a suitable frameworkto evaluate the impact of sociotechnical engineering courses (i.e., a humanistic approach toengineering education) on students’ attitudes toward and perceptions of engineering.Furthermore, this framework explicitly describes and explains the possible connections betweenstudents’ attitudes toward and perceptions of engineering, making it appropriate for a studyinterested in exploring these relationships. The framework has been used to guide how weconceptualize sociotechnical engineering. The instrument used for this study included items andconstructs that align with all three dimensions of Fila et al.’s [1] framework.MethodsSurvey responses collected from undergraduate
2114242. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions, or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views ofthe National Science Foundation.References[1] P. Moen, “The Uneven Stress of Social Change: Disruptions, Disparities, and Mental Health,” Soc. Ment. Health, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 85–98, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21568693221100171.[2] Z. Abrams, “Student mental health is in crisis. Campuses are rethinking their approach,” Monit. Psychol., vol. 53, no. 7, p. 60, 2022, doi: https://www.apa.org/monitor/2022/10/mental-health-campus-care.[3] T. N. Hanh, Peace Is Every Step. Bantam Books, 1992.[4] J. Kabat-Zinn, Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face
methods in STEM education assessment topromote inclusivity, engage learners, and empower underrepresented and marginalizedcommunities. Such research can then inform future pedagogical practices, curriculum design,evaluation plans, and resource allocation to contribute to a more inclusive and diverse STEMlearning environment and resultantly, the future STEM workforce.ReferencesBattel, K., Foster, N., Barroso, L. V., Bhaduri, S., Mandala, K., & Erickson, L. (2021, October).“We Make the Village”-Inspiring STEM Among Young Girls and the Power of CreativeEngineering Education in Action. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.Bevan, B. B., Barton, A. C., & Garibay, C. (2018). Why broaden perspectives on
Psychologist, 34(1), 118-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005282374Bowman, P. J. (2013). A Strengths-Based Social Psychological Approach to Resiliency: Cultural Diversity, Ecological, and Life Span Issues. In S. Prince-Embury & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), (pp. 299-324). Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4939-3_21Brooms, D. R., & Davis, A. R. (2017). Exploring Black Males' Community Cultural Wealth and College Aspirations. Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men, 6(1), 33-33. https://doi.org/10.2979/spectrum.6.1.02Burrell, J. O., Fleming, L., Fredericks, A. C., & Moore, I. (2015). Domestic and international student matters: The college experiences of Black males majoring in
conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and donot necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. 1Fisher identified significant gender differences in major selection for male- and female-identifiedstudents in computing based on individuals’ attention to “computing with a purpose” [9].However, it is important that we recall Slaton’s cautions against the operation of essentialismwithin this approach to diversity and inclusion and not predicate calls for change on a “naturaldifference” in approaches to engineering, rather we call for a change in values for liberation [10].Our department is at the beginning of a multi-year journey of
structural barriers. Engineering needsto transform into an environment where LGBTQ people can thrive through authenticparticipation if engineering fields hope to benefit in the myriad ways promised by professedvision and value statements throughout the field.AcknowledgmentsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.2046233. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] E. A. Cech and T. J. Waidzunas, "Systemic inequalities for LGBTQ professionals in STEM," Science Advances, vol. 7, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe0933.[2] B. E
this way, futurework will allow for development of targeted interventions aimed at improving help seeking in theundergraduate engineering student population.References[1] S. K. Lipson, E. G. Lattie, and D. Eisenberg, "Increased Rates of Mental Health Service Utilization by U.S. College Students: 10-Year Population-Level Trends (2007–2017)," Psychiatric Services, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 60-63, 2019/01/01 2018, doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800332.[2] D. Eisenberg et al., "The Health Minds Study: 2014 Data Report," 2014.[3] D. Eisenberg, Lipson, S. K., Heinze, J., Zhou, S., Talaski, A., & Patterson, A, "The Healthy Minds Study: 2021 Winter/Spring Data Report.," 2021.[4] D. Eisenberg, M. F. Downs, E. Golberstein, and
provided an example of how “bigdata” and algorithms determine credit scores: “The algorithm that's used to determine that is so mysterious. No one really knows what's going into it and how different companies aggregate that data and make a determination on someone[’s score]. A lot of people say the algorithm isn’t going to discriminate, but [it can]” (P02 White man domestic student).The concern regarding the inner workings of AI models and smart devices was intensified amongECE students who, reflecting on their own lengthy training, realize that most users lack thisexpertise and might unknowingly expose themselves to risks. “All of us are using small AI toolsat home with Siri and Alexa, and I feel all these tools are
Effective & - Build connections with peers in the course via discussion. Enduring Advocacy - Provide feedback on course outline (first opportunity for co-creation). - Discussion on critical pedagogy as it pertains to the How We instructors’ advocacy framework, both as an example of Conceptualize what they will be asked to do (with a framework of their 2 Advocacy: choice) and to deepen their understanding of the current Frameworks & course’s guiding principles. Scholars - Opportunity to dive deeper into particular framework(s
ideologies [3]; these perspectives are also alignedwith Radoff et al.’s description of narrow thinking [13]. Previous research has looked at howundergraduate engineering students align with these common narratives in interviews and focusgroups with students [10, 13], surveys [19], student classwork [15], and whole class discussions[7, 14]. The four common narratives that are pertinent to this study are technocracy, free marketidealism, technological neutrality, and technological determinism.Technocracy is a decision making approach guided by the belief that all problems can andshould be solved through technology [21]. Here, technological solutions are privileged, oftenwith little consideration of the social, political and historical context of the
interpersonalconflicts.Acknowledgements: This work is supported by the National Social Science Fund of China(AIA220013).References Brown P R, Matusovich H M. Career Goals, Self-Efficacy and Persistence in Engineering Students. IEEEFrontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2016. Chenchen Zhu and Luze Han. 2021. CV chatbot based on “STAR” method. In Proceedings of HumanInterface Technologies 2020/21 Winter conference (CPEN541). ACM, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6 pages. Choi D S, Loui M C. Grit for Engineering Students. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. David D. Woods. Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering [J].Reliability Engineering and System Safety,2015(141):5-9. French B.F, Immekus J C, Oakes
reasons why certain topics are more popular than others. 2. Conduct a demographic analysis of the students to find out if there is any connection between the groups they identify with and the module they choose. 3. Examine the impact of these DEI-themed modules in an upper division algorithms course taken by all students in the computer engineering track in our department.References: 1. National Academy of Sciences. (2011). Expanding Underrepresented Minority Participation: America's Science and Technology Talent at the Crossroads: The National Academies Press. 2. Handelsman J., Elgin S., Estrada M., Hays, S., Johnson T., Miller S., Mingo V., Shaffer C., and Williams J., “Achieving STEM Diversity: Fix the
Grant No.2306178. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendation expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] J. Trevelyan, “Transitioning to engineering practice,” Eur. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 821–837, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1080/03043797.2019.1681631.[2] Z. S. Byrne, J. W. Weston, and K. Cave, “Development of a Scale for Measuring Students’ Attitudes Towards Learning Professional (i.e., Soft) Skills,” Res. Sci. Educ., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1417–1433, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11165-018-9738-3.[3] R. P. Aleman and et al, “Mind the Gap: Exploring the Exploring the Perceived Gap Between Social and Technical Aspects
intersectionality include [13]–[15]. Researchers who have exposure tothis area already will likely recognize that one Crenshaw citation [16] that is used to signal thatintersectionality is being considered. We ourselves are guilty of including just this citation as asignal that we are trying to do something more than just examining our population data, but wefall short when we do not prioritize reading and theorizing beyond that shallow attribution.We call on ourselves and our fellow researchers to recognize that intersectionality is an entirefield and one which we must approach with some humility. We encourage our fellow researchersto recognize (y)our own positionality and limitations, and know when you need to invitesomeone(s) else. We do want to caution
whiteheterosexual cisgender woman. The researchers also represent undergraduate student, graduatestudent, and faculty roles in a variety of engineering and/or engineering education fields. Thiswork is deeply rooted in the experiences of oppression and marginalization of the LGBTQ+authors in STEM and seeks to find ways to undermine the systems of oppression that havecaused harm to them and others.Methods This research used focus groups and individual interviews to explore the experiences ofLGBTQ+ STEM undergraduate students at a large R1 university in the U. S. southwest. Datacollection occurred in Fall of 2020. Interview and focus group recruitment was achieved using acall that was sent to out to all graduate and undergraduate students through
, maintaining health, expressing humanity throughthe arts, and experiencing joy has been a major trend throughout human history. At the sametime, engineering has also been used for destructive purposes, including the development of toolsand processes that subjugate and inflict violence upon humans, other living things, and theenvironment. A critical juncture in the path that engineering has taken occurred during the 2ndWestern Industrial Revolution from the mid 1800’s to the early 1900’s. During this time,enterprises for capitalist accumulation of wealth and power came to dominate the field ofengineering and engineers became wedded to the interests of corporate capitalism. Today thelegacy of this shift persists. While there continue to be engineers
by other students and how instructors can work todisrupt these dynamics and support all students in engaging in more careful classroominteractions.References[1] D. Ozkan and C. Andrews (2022). “Perspectives of Seven Minoritized Students in a First-Year Course Redesign toward Sociotechnical Engineering Education”. Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. https://peer.asee.org/41382[2] Fries-Britt, S., George Mwangi, C. A., and Peralta, A. M. (2014). Learning race in a U.S. context: An emergent framework on the perceptions of race among foreign-born students of color. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035636[3] Ross, M. B. Capobianco, and A
knowledge and skills in both. Also, this work providesa novel perspective from individuals who might not have necessarily experienced traditional conceptionsand practices of engineering, which are often artificially separated from societal contexts andresponsibility.References[1] W. K. Jenkins, “Today’s Engineering Education Is a Liberal Arts Education of the Future [Point of View],” Proc. IEEE, vol. 102, no. 9, pp. 1306–1309, 2014.[2] S. B. Sample, “Engineering education and the liberal arts tradition,” IEEE Trans. Educ., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 54–57, 1988.[3] K. L. S. Bernhardt and J. S. Rossmann, “An integrative education in engineering and the liberal arts: An institutional case study,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Engineering, 3) and comparing these tocontent from the new study that is publicly available. An additional aim of this article is to raiseawareness of the upcoming NAE report and encourage thought-provoking discussions about it atthe ASEE 2024 Annual Conference.IntroductionEngineering has long been characterized by the benefits it imparts on society. As early as the1800’s when American engineers began to delineate professional guidelines and codes ofconduct, engineering has been associated with “societal uplift” [1, p. 2]. Current day, theforemost engineering professional societies have similar mission and vision statements such as“advancing engineering for the benefit of humanity” [2], “engineered and natural systemswork[ing] in harmony for the
contexts, and perceived future outcomes. Withthat, and in relation to whether one identifies HC as active or passive, People of Color (POC) andmarginalized identities have operated in a world that is curtailed to and normalized/s theexperience of whiteness. Because of this, a POC woman might feel a HC that perpetuates andnormalizes the status quo of cisgender-heterosexual white male engineers as active whereas awhite male might identify a professor including nontraditional engineers of color into theircurriculum as active. HC can be identified as active or passive for different reasons based ondifferent identities. Through the lens of sociology and symbolic interactionism theory, passive is defined asindividuals who “receive society in a
which led me topiqued their reflect on the ethical responsibilities of engineers. …it teaches an important lesson ininterest: how a limited perspective can lead to unequitable technology.” “This class was unlike any other class, whether in college or high school, I have everStudent 4’s taken before. Prior to taking this class, when I saw EG or ENG followed by numbersreflection testifies on my schedule I expected to do critical thinking, but in a math, or science sense.to the viability of This class shifted that expectation drastically. Each time I entered this class,weaving critical especially later in the semester, I was challenged with new ideas of what it
SelvesThe psychological concept of possible selves, developed by Hazel Markus and Paula Nurius,examines how people use both positive and negative imaginations of the self to guidemotivation, behavior, and identity construction, including ethical formation [4]. According to theauthors, possible selves facilitate self-knowledge informed by “the ideal selves we would verymuch like to become” as well as “the selves we are afraid of becoming” [4]. As such, possibleselves function as “cognitive manifestation[s]” of persistent “goals, aspirations, motives, fears,and threats” and operate as “the essential link between self-concept and motivation” [4].Importantly, the authors argue that the possible selves people construct, though numerous andvaried, are