Paper ID #38036Introducing Engineering through the Sociotechnical Histories of EverydayTechnologiesDr. Sarvnaz Lotfi, Loyola University, Maryland Sarvnaz Lotfi holds a PhD in Science, Technology, and Society. Her historical research into R&D, busi- ness, and valuation as well as her commitment to radically rethinking STEM pedagogy draw inspiration from early-20th-century pragmatist philosopher and education reformer, John Dewey. She is currently a Postdoctoral Teaching Fellow at Loyola University Maryland where she teaches in the Departments of Engineering and Philosophy.Dr. Raenita A. Fenner, Loyola University, Maryland
Paper ID #41503Teaching to Transgress in a Technology and Society CourseDr. Stephanie Hladik, University of Manitoba Dr. Stephanie Hladik (she/her) is an Assistant Professor in the Centre for Engineering Professional Practice and Engineering Education at the University of Manitoba. She holds BSc and MSc degrees in Electrical Engineering, as well as a PhD in Learning Sciences, all from the University of Calgary. Her research interests lie at the intersections of design, equity, and education. She is deeply interested in the roles that facilitators (informal educators, teaching assistants, parents, and others) play in the
Paper ID #37847Hybrid engineering: An auto-ethnographic story of hybrid curriculumdevelopment, learning, and teachingProf. Eunjeong Ma, Pohang University of Science and Technology Trained in Science and Technology Studies, my teaching and research areas include intersections between technology/engineering and society. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023Hybrid pedagogies in the making?: A case study of hybrid engineering discipline and cultureEunjeong Ma, Pohang University of Science and TechnologyAbstract: This is an auto-ethnographic account of encounters with
education, collegiate service-learning, and sustainable energy installations in Latin America. Steve has experience in multi-disciplinary collaborations, in addition to collaborations with businesses, non-profit organizations, and community- based organizations. Involved in efforts that engage communities in designing, implementing, and maintaining varied sustainable energy technologies and using them as vehicles for economic and community development.Sarah Aileen Brownell, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) Sarah Brownell is the Director of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program and a Lecturer in Design, Development and Manufacturing for the Kate Gleason College of Engineering at the Rochester Institute of
Paper ID #42612Board 133: Work in Progress - A Pilot Course on Effective and EnduringAdvocacy: Leading with Compassion in STEMJacqueline Rose Tawney, California Institute of Technology Jacqueline Tawney is a Ph.D. candidate in GALCIT (Graduate Aerospace Laboratories of the California Institute of Technology). Jacque is a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellow, and a leader and organizer for many student groups. In the Kornfield group within Caltech’s Chemical Engineering department, Jacque researches associative polymers, their rheological properties, and their potential for agricultural and industrial
the National Academies, Dr. Butler was an analyst for the U.S. Congress Office of Technology Assessment, a research associate in the Department of Environmental Health of the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, conducted research at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, and practiced as a product safety engineer at Xerox Corporation. He has directed numerous National Academies studies on engineering and environmental policy topics. Dr. Butler earned his BS and MS degrees in electrical engineering with a concentration in biomedical engineering from the University of Rochester and his PhD in public policy analysis from Carnegie Mellon University. He is a recipient of the National Academies’ Cecil
Engineering & Society, University of Virginia. Before joining UVA. she was a research fellow at National Institutes of Health, and worked for Drexel University as assistant research professor.Dr. Jongmin Lee, University of Science and TechnologyDr. Sean Michael Ferguson, CSUCI This paper is a joint project of Drs. Sean Ferguson, Sharon Ku, Jongmin Lee, and our amazing RA Yixiang Sun. Sean Ferguson was Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering and Society’s Science, Technology, and Society (STS) Program at the University of Virginia from 2014-2022. He currently has been working with a team at NYCU in Taiwan and UST in Korea to run a global virtual classroom. In addition, with collaborators at California State
Paper ID #42171”I’m Not Like a Human Being”: How the Teaming Experiences of AfricanAmerican Females Reveal the Hidden Epistemologies of Engineering CultureKaitlyn Anne Thomas, University of Nevada, Reno Ms. Thomas is a doctoral student at University of Nevada, Reno in Engineering Education. Her background is in structural engineering. She received her bachelor’s and master’s degrees in civil engineering from Southern Methodist University. Her research focus is in epistemology and epistemic injustice.Dr. Kelly J Cross, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Cross is currently an Assistant Professor in the Biomedical Engineering
Paper ID #39306Characterizing student argument justifications in small groupsociotechnical discussionsDr. Chelsea Joy Andrews, Tufts University Chelsea Andrews is a Research Assistant Professor at Tufts University, at the Center for Engineering Education and Outreach (CEEO).Ms. Fatima Rahman, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach STEM Education graduate student at Tufts University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Characterizing student arguments against a technology in small group sociotechnical discussionsIntroductionUniversities across the
particular, thearchetypal figure of Victor Frankenstein offers students a model of a negative “possible self” thatcautions against rogue engineering practices. The paper analyzes themes from Shelley’s novel asthey were used in courses in science, technology, and society (STS) to foster ethical reflection onthe perils of practicing irresponsible, presumptuous, unaccountable, and biased techno-science.IntroductionMary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein is widely regarded as a foundational work of early sciencefiction that cautions against misguided and unethical science and engineering. As such, the novelshould be poised to help engineering undergraduates cultivate moral imagination and acommitment to socially responsible techno-science. Along this line, a
, including the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), theNational Academy of Engineering (NAE), and the National Science Foundation (NSF), all agreethat social responsibility is a vital component of an engineer's professional formation.[7]–[9]. They emphasize that social responsibility must be a guiding and transformativeexperience in the education of engineers. Social responsibility refers to an activity or actionwithin science and technology that is socially responsible if it satisfies certain ethical principles,and socially irresponsible if it does not satisfy those principles [10].” In a sense, socialresponsibility goes beyond the ethical obligation engineers have to society and the environmentby including agency towards
, male engineer-managers with close ties to industry owners exerting control over state apparatuses, engineering academies, and professional societies. Business professionalism has been made the official ideology of the organized engineering profession, one which reproduces a culture of disengagement. This focuses efforts toward individual careers and upward mobility in corporate hierarchies rather than collective or systemic change toward safer, healthier, and more just workplaces and worlds. 3. Engineers’ societal status and timing of unionization – US engineers nominally enjoy a high societal status owing to their associations with business and technology that are both highly valued in US society
Paper ID #37848Minoritization Processes in Structural Engineering Diversity WorkDr. Lara K. Schubert, UCLA; Cal State Los Angeles; Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo Lara K. Schubert is a research affiliate at the UCLA Center for the Study of Women. She is a former full-time structural engineer who works in feminist studies of science and technology, teaching on these topics at California State University, Los Angeles and California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Minoritization Processes in Structural Engineering Diversity
education might frame amore engaged, critical and politicized sensibility in the twenty-first century engineeringcurriculum. How are nationality (and nationalisms) conforming the experiences of Engineeringteachers and learners? We ask, that is, how it is that an individual identifies themself with bothan ethnic or national collective and the putative universality of technoscience, or finds themselfstruggling to do so.For this brief overview of interrogative possibilities, we work with the case of two influentialnodes of global engineering education as they functioned in an especially fraught geopoliticalmoment: the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States and SharifUniversity (previously Aryamehr University of Technology) in
student success; and (c) cultivate more ethical future scientists and engineers by blending social, political and technological spheres. She prioritizes working on projects that seek to share power with students and orient to stu- dents as partners in educational transformation. She pursues projects that aim to advance social justice in undergraduate STEM programs and she makes these struggles for change a direct focus of her research.Devyn Elizabeth ShaferDr. Brianne Gutmann, San Jos´e State University Brianne Gutmann (she/her) is an Assistant Professor at San Jos´e State University. She does physics education research with expertise in adaptive online learning tools, identity-responsive mentoring and community
Paper ID #39198Divergence and Convergence in Engineering Leadership, Entrepreneurship,Management, and PolicyDr. Kathryn A. Neeley, University of Virginia Kathryn Neeley is Associate Professor of Science, Technology, and Society in the Engineering & So- ciety Department of the School of Engineering and Applied Science. She is a past chair of the Liberal Education/Engineering & Society Division of ASEE and isDr. Rider W. Foley, California State University, Channel Islands Dr. Rider W. Foley is an assistant professor in the science, technology & society program in the De- partment of Engineering and Society at the
struggles against all forms of domination andoppression.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (Award#2233622). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in thismaterial are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.The authors would like to thank Max Skorodinsky for his helpful comments on a draft of thismanuscript. References[1] A. Menier, R. Zarch and S. Sexton, “Broadening gender in computing for transgender and nonbinary learners,” 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT
, gender and sexuality studies(WGSS) or ethnic studies empowers minoritized engineering students to develop criticalconsciousness relative to the culture of engineering. Our work investigates the influence of twosuch courses on student attitudes and motivation by gathering both qualitative and quantitativedata from students in two STEM-themed courses in WGSS and ethnic studies, “Gender andSTEM” and “Race and Technology.” We argue that in these courses students acquire skills thatenable them to critically reflect on both the socially constructed nature of STEM and on thehistorical patterns within engineering culture that exacerbate existing inequities and injusticedespite claims of “neutral” objectivity. In preliminary data, students report that
Paper ID #42156The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation &Identity FormationDr. Timothy Duane Reedy, University of Maryland, College ParkDr. David Tomblin, University of Maryland, College Park David is the director of the Science, Technology and Society program at the University of Maryland, College Park. He works with STEM majors on the ethical and social dimensions of science and technology. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 The Power of Place: A Critical Examination of Engineering Enculturation and Identity FormationAbstract
tobranching out beyond their discipline. Speaking of interdisciplinary research integrating socialand technological innovation, Leo said “This needs to not be something that people are doing off the side of their desk as one more thing, as is so often the case with academia. So, it’s to recognize that we need a structure that enables folks who are serious about doing this [non-traditional research], to be able to not do some other things for a while, while they engage in doing this.” (00:10:55–00:11:10)In an example of a later phase of a problem-solving mindset, after defining this structural problemfor engineering faculty, Leo went on to suggest possible solutions to encourage more faculty toget involved with cross
, 22 Patrick et al,23 and Johnson24 propose cultural change strategies for engineering educatorsand practitioners. Tonso calls for cultural change in engineering education based on feminist critiquerather than “cosmetic changes,”19 Riley urges us to strengthen cultures of accountability and fidelity tocore public and professional values in the wake of high profile engineering scandals,20 Kim and hercolleagues call for shifts in engineers’ moral formation to foster ethical practice in industry, 22, 25-27Patrick and her colleagues advocate for educational reform to replace technical silos withinterdisciplinary collaboration between engineers and STS (science and technology studies) scholars,23and Johnson urges us to grapple with the inherent
Paper ID #43601Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training among EngineeringMaster’s StudentsElana Goldenkoff, University of MichiganDr. Erin A. Cech, University of Michigan ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Left on their Own: Confronting Absences of AI Ethics Training amongEngineering Master’s StudentsAbstractAlthough development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies has been underway fordecades, the acceleration of AI capabilities and rapid expansion of user access in the past fewyears has elicited public excitement as well as alarm. Leaders in government and academia, aswell as members of the
understand students’experience of the integration of the engineering and liberal arts, which is a focus of the ASEE LEESdivision.Rationale and BackgroundIn the pursuit of promoting the integration of the liberal arts and engineering, a voice that is often missingis of the students who are actually experiencing the convergence of the two during their collegeeducation. Framing engineering as a humanistic vocation which can be a notable function of a liberal artseducation, has the potential to develop and sustain pro-social beliefs among students and also contributeto their holistic formation as individuals and professionals.There have been voices predicting that engineering will be the liberal arts of the 21st century given theincrease in technology
during the pandemic. In addition, the interviewees noted uncertain prospect of the industry as one of the crises theywere facing. Industrial transformation and technological upgrading that threaten traditionalindustries, as well as the slowing down economy due to the Covid pandemic, caused anxietiesamong early career engineers about their job security.Crises resulted from personal strugglesThis dimension mainly illustrates the incompatibility with work that resulted from early careerengineers’ own physical and psychological reactions, including physical repulsion, grievance, andself-confusion. First, some early career engineers noted their physical repulsion at the work environment. Forexample, a process development engineer said
researchers can disrupt the chilly, heteronormativeculture of STEM by modeling inclusive classroom and lab practices. Additionally, we offerinsights on how students negotiate their identity visibility in a chilly, heteronormative, and silentculture. Introduction Despite efforts to increase diversity and inclusion on college and university campuses,Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) programs continue to be largelycisgender, male, heterosexual, and white [1]–[3]This continued lack of diversity is largely due tothe heteronormative, racist, and sexist culture that serves to make STEM spaces inhospitable formarginalized students, and results in high levels of attrition for these groups [1], [4]. In order toaddress this, we
) from inception to 2023. The FSEE serves as a hub for theatre technology, engineering and innovation at Purdue University, and is a recognized leader in education at the nexus of entertainment and engineering within the broad community of entertainment practice.Prof. Rich Dionne, Purdue University, West Lafayette ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Three-year Capstone Design - An innovative interdisciplinary preparation for authentic engineering practiceAbstractEvery engineering student enrolled in an ABET-accredited engineering program encounters aculminating design experience that is formulated to require the use of engineering standards,present a context with
Paper ID #38514Learning the Impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Modules in anUndergraduate Electrical Engineering ClassroomDr. Nina Kamath Telang, University of Texas, Austin Nina Telang is a senior lecturer in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Univer- sity of Texas at Austin. She received the B.Tech degree in Engineering Physics from the Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai in 1989, and the M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame in 1992 and 1995.Mr. Ramakrishna Sai Annaluru, University of Texas, Austin Ramakrishna (Sai) Annaluru is a 5th year graduate student in electrical
networks, their experiences of in/authenticity,and different educational and vocational outcomes in engineering. This may also offer insightinto how students organize their networks into environments where they are more likely toexperience state authenticity. Implications for practice include helping LGBTQ students findcommunity in engineering and other STEM fields through organizations like Out to Innovate andoSTEM.IntroductionThis theoretical paper proposes a framework to understand LGBTQ (lesbian, gay, bisexual,transgender, and queer/questioning) participation in STEM (science, technology, engineering,and mathematics) that reveals how heterosexism and cissexism operate in engineering. Agrowing body of research is demonstrating that LGBTQ people
Paper ID #37415”Studies in the Strategies of Overcomers”: Literature Review of theExperiences of High-achieving Black Male Undergraduate EngineeringStudentsDr. Royce A. Francis, The George Washington University Dr. Royce Francis is an Associate Professor in the Department of Engineering Management and Sys- tems Engineering. His overall research vision is to conduct research, teaching, and service that facilitates sustainable habitation of the built environment. This vision involves three thrusts: 1.) infrastructure management, including sustainability, resilience, and risk analysis; 2.) regulatory risk assessment and
theuniversity. Students who identify as underrepresented on the basis of race and/or gender are lesslikely to have access to technical learning opportunities and technologies [8]. In K-12 contexts,Vakil [9] explains that “research unequivocally shows that high quality STEM learningopportunities in and out of school are largely denied to racially minoritized students” (p.90).Numerous studies have shown that in university programs, students benefit from previoustechnical experience [10], but women are far less likely to have such experiences because ofgendered stereotypes of engineering processes e.g. computer coding [11].There are also challenges arising from students’ interests and the impact of gender stereotypes oncareer choice. For example, Potvin