Conference Session

Refining Manufacturing Education Practices

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Christoph Johannes Sielmann P.Eng., University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Casey James Keulen, University of British Columbia, Vancouver; Abbas Hosseini, University of British Columbia, Vancouver

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

British Columbia, where he serves as the program advisor for the Manufacturing Engineering undergraduate program. Casey’s research interests include multi-campus instruction and the development of open educational resources.Abbas Hosseini, University of British Columbia, Vancouver ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Reflections on Multi-campus Teaching in a New Manufacturing Engineering ProgramAbstractIn 2019, the University of British Columbia (UBC) initiated a new multi-campus manufacturingengineering program involving two campuses situated over 450 km apart. Each institution isresponsible for managing its own curriculum and specialization within manufacturing

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 7

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sandra Walter Huffman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Kaitlyn Becker, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John Liu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Rebecca E Zubajlo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Warren P. Seering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

Letters. His research is supported by the Department of Commerce, Department of Defense, Massachusetts Technology Collaborative, Schmidt Futures, National Science Foundation, MIT, and industry partners.Prof. Warren P. Seering, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyRebecca E Zubajlo, Massachusetts Institute of Technology ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 ‭Reflections on the Implementation of Short, Authentic Oral‬ ‭Assessments in a University Manufacturing Course‬1‭ ) Introduction: Why Authentic Exams? Why this class?‬ ‭Most technical engineering assessments are high-stakes written exams where student success‬ ‭depends on finding correct, numerical answers to well-defined

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 4

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Dalya Ismael, Old Dominion University; Vukica M. Jovanovic, Old Dominion University; Murat Kuzlu, Old Dominion University; Charles Lowe, Old Dominion University; Lisa Bosman, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

principles. These topics were aligned with specific learningoutcomes, as outlined in Table 1, to ensure students developed competencies in recognizingenvironmental challenges, applying whole life cycle thinking, and assessing inclusive andsustainable business models.Throughout the course, participants completed photo-voice assignments to reflect theirunderstanding of the EOP topics. The photo-voice assignments required students to submit animage that represented a sustainability concept discussed in class and to write a short narrativeexplaining its relevance. The assignment prompt encouraged students to connect their selectedimages to lean engineering principles, environmental sustainability, and responsible businesspractices. By requiring students

Conference Session

Project-Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

Photovoice reflections as well as written and oral presentations during andat the end of the term and are based on evaluating the level of practical knowledge gained by the studentsduring the development of such projects. As a general outcome, students became more involved duringclass time, and also they have shown interest in other research areas, being involved in extra courseresearch activities. Details related to the intervention and lessons learned will be provided so otherengineering instructors can easily re-create in the classroom. Overall, many different fields ofengineering instructors can benefit from this project-based approach to combine theory and practice toprepare the students to become better problem solvers and obtain practical

Conference Session

Refining Manufacturing Education Practices

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Arif Sirinterlikci, Robert Morris University; Jameela Al-Jaroodi; Anthony Moretti, Robert Morris University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

six individual skillmodules covering skills such as dependability, responsibility, independence, persistence,integrity, and ethics. The main goal is to create multiple opportunities to teach and reinforcesoft skills within the regular technical curriculum in the high schools. This paper discussesthe integration of the soft skills modules into the technical curriculum developed viaexamples, and outlines its potential uses in this engineering department’s curriculumincluding its manufacturing engineering program. The paper concludes with a discussion ofthe implementation of this project and provides some preliminary feedback from theparticipating high schools and reflections of the authors. It also includes future workopportunities such as

Conference Session

Virtual and Augmented Reality Application in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Israa Azzam, Purdue University; Farid Breidi, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI); Faisal Aqlan, University of Louisville

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

Society of Phi Kappa Phi, placing her among the top 10% of Purdue Graduate students. Her academic journey reflects a commitment to advancing knowledge and contributing to technological innovation in XR control systems. Her professional aspirations include applying for an Assistant Professor position upon completing her Ph.D. This career trajectory aligns with her desire to leverage her accumulated experience and knowledge to mentor and guide emerging talents. A central component of her vision is inspiring and supporting aspiring scholars in pursuing academic and professional excellence, facilitating impactful change within our field.Dr. Farid Breidi, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Dr. Farid

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

critical thinking skills,which further hinders their ability to grasp geometric concepts effectively [4]. Teaching andlearning geometry is challenging, with studies showing that students' attitudes and willingness toengage with the subject significantly impact their success [5].Gaining insight into characteristics of Gen Z learners can benefit mathematics teachers inestablishing classroom norms and designing instruction that helps students achieve highstandards. Gen Z students are constantly engaged with digital media and prefer interactive andtechnology-enhanced learning environments. They thrive in settings that offer immediatefeedback and opportunities for collaboration, reflecting their social and connected nature.Although Gen Z is the first

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Poster Session

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eunseob Kim, Purdue University; Lucas Wiese, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Hector Will, Oakland City University; Alejandra J. Magana, Purdue University at West Lafayette (COE); Martin Jun, Purdue University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

, reflectiveobservation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation, created by contextualdemands. Thus, ELT's implications for the course's design consisted of guiding learners throughrecursive processes of experiencing, reflecting, thinking, and acting to respond to the learningsituation. That is, "immediate or concrete experiences are the basis for observations andreflections. These reflections are assimilated and distilled into abstract concepts from which newimplications for action can be drawn. These implications can be actively tested and serve asguides in creating new experiences" [5]. Specifics of how ELT guided the course implementationare described in the section below.3. The CourseThe course titled Industrial IoT Implementation for Smart

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 3

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Anis Fatima, Michigan Technological University; John L. Irwin, Michigan Technological University; Muhammad Wasif, NED University of Engineering and Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

module was developed to illustrate the functioning of a digital twin systemand was applied to two key courses: Smart Manufacturing and the Internet of Things (IoT). Bothcourses are offered to students in their senior years. To assess the impact of this teaching moduleand the effectiveness of the pedagogy applied, a questionnaire-based survey (Appendix A) wasconducted, focusing on the implementation of feminist pedagogy principles in the classroom.Feminist pedagogy, as discussed by various scholars, promotes values such as knowledge co-creation, empowerment, and reflection, which were identified as the primary tenets guiding ofthis study [20] . Feminist pedagogy has significant implications for engineering education, as itchallenges the

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Kenton Blane Fillingim, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Lauren Heinrich, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; Ashley Gannon, Oak Ridge National Lab; Thomas Feldhausen, Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

rate their confidence from the course from two perspectives: DED parameter developmentand CAM strategy development. These perspectives are driven in relation to what they see byinspecting the process stability and printed part quality. Survey questions were phrased to representdifferent levels of cognitive thinking for the respective application, as shown in the bulleted listbelow, followed by open-ended reflection on beneficial, confusing, or absent process factors todrive future workshop iterations. • Remember common DED parameter development process and failures • Understand how process parameters and toolpath strategies influence the print geometry • Apply understand of DED processes to develop process parameters and toolpath

Conference Session

Redefining Manufacturing Education Practices

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

aims to encourage continuousimprovement in engineering and technology education and ensure that graduates have thenecessary knowledge and skills to meet industry and society's evolving needs.ABET accreditation holds significant value for students, faculty, and programs, as it proves thatthe program has met rigorous standards and is dedicated to providing quality education.Accreditation by ABET also offers recognition and professional development opportunities forgraduates.2.4. Service LearningService learning is an educational method that blends community service with academicinstruction, reflection on the service experience, and connecting it to personal and social growth.Its aim is to offer students practical opportunities to use their

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Weihang Zhu, University of Houston - COE; Mariam Manuel, University of Houston - COE; Paige Evans, University of Houston; Peter Weber, University of Houston, College of Technology (MERGED MEMBERSHIP WITH COE)

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

reported thatteachers had “a critical lack of understanding and knowledge relating to framing the designchallenge, the use of technology and the scaffolding of the creative and reflective designprocess” ( (Smith, Iversen, & Hjorth, 2015), p. 22). Kostakis et al. (2015) conducted a pilotqualitative study that examined educational benefits of 3DP and design with 33 high schoolstudents in Greece (Kostakis, Niaros, & Giotitsas, 2015). They stressed the importance ofpreparing teachers for such projects and the need of possessing technological skills and in-depthunderstanding of 3DP and EDP. Several studies in East Asia introduced 3DP to PSTs and developed a TPACK-basedcurriculum (Sullivan & McCartney, 2017; Yi, Park, & Lee, 2016

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Md Fashiar Rahman, University of Texas at El Paso; Tzu-liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso; Richard Y Chiou, Drexel University; Jakia Sultana, University of Texas at El Paso; S M Atikur Rahman, University of Texas at El Paso; Selim Molla, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

many institutions struggle to sustain,widening the gap in educational quality and industry readiness. Digital laboratory modules usingcomputer simulations offer a cost-effective and scalable solution to overcome the challenges oftraditional manufacturing education. By leveraging simulation tools and virtual labs, institutionscan provide students with realistic, interactive learning experiences without expensive physical 3equipment. These modules allow students to experiment with complex manufacturing processes,design prototypes, and analyze production systems in a risk-free environment. Additionally, digitallabs can be easily updated to reflect

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 2

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Paul C. Lynch, Pennsylvania State University Erie, The Behrend College; Mark Rubeo, Pennsylvania State University, Behrend College; Christopher Henri Annear, Pennsylvania State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

. The curriculum will be delivered in multiple levels,or “tiers.” This paper will detail the development of the so-called level one (core) curriculumwhich covers a broad range of topics and is intended to build foundational knowledge for anunexperienced audience. Additional METAL training levels, still in development, will providedeep dives into industry-relevant and advanced topics.3 METAL Level One (Core)METAL trainings are intended to cover a wide range of industry relevant topics in metalworkingbeginning with basic, foundational knowledge and progressing through advanced university-level research topics. The training curriculum is colloquially referred to as “tiered” or“stackable” reflecting that each subsequent level builds upon

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 4

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Gimantha N Perera, University of Arizona; Hannah Budinoff, The University of Arizona; DAVID MANFORD, The University of Arizona

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

ratings. Positive ratings (scores of 3, 4, and5) were primarily justified by students highlighting the role of risk-taking in growth, creativity, andconfidence-building. They valued calculated risks in supportive environments like engineering projects,emphasizing self-belief, preparation, and the acceptance of failure as key drivers for willingness to takerisks. Negative ratings (scores of -5 to -1) were less common and typically attributed to discomfort withuncertainty, a preference for guidelines, or a lack of confidence. Some students expressed a desire to takemore risks but struggled with hesitation or internal barriers. The most frequent ratings were 2 and 3.These responses reflected a balanced approach to risk-taking, where students

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 8

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yalcin Ertekin, Drexel University; Irina Nicoleta Ciobanescu, Drexel University; Richard Y Chiou, Drexel University; Tzu-liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

process through cutting-edge technologies like industrial PCs, HumanMachine Interface Controllers, Various sensing and tracking devices and vision cameras.This paper emphasizes the growing significance of project-based learning, noting its alignment with newtechnological trends such as Industry 4.0 and smart manufacturing and assembly. The integration of smart andsustainable manufacturing in capstone topics mirrors this shift, contributing to the development of leadershipskills, creativity, and innovation among students. With over 65% of capstone projects focused on manufacturing,energy, and sustainability, students engage with open-ended projects that reflect real-world uncertainties andrequire them to determine optimal solutions. Through this

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ziling Chen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Zhen Zhao, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John Liu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

[10, 13],particularly in manufacturing programs where iterative experimentation, physical manipulation ofequipment, and real-time data collection are essential [14–18].Among the emerging solutions for remote labs, simulation-based platforms have garneredattention for their wide accessibility and relatively low setup costs. These virtual environmentsenable students to practice and visualize engineering concepts without geographic or schedulingconstraints. However, although simulations can effectively reinforce theoretical knowledge, theyoften lack the physical realism and unpredictability of authentic lab work [19–23]. Updating orexpanding simulation environments to reflect changing industrial practices can also be expensiveand time-consuming

Conference Session

Project-Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hannah D Budinoff, The University of Arizona; Andrew Wessman; Kargi Chauhan

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

, students were asked to complete the modulesin class in a self-paced activity. This self-paced format seemed to be a good fit for studentsexploring standards, with one student saying: Personally, I really preferred this type of module for AM standards over the typical lectures. Not to say that technical standards and AM standards aren't important, but it would be difficult to fully learn and understand them by just sitting through lectures about them. I thought the reflections and case study were the best activities to have gone through in the modules. Showing how to find standards and then trying to apply them and give reasoning to where they can be used was a good exercise, and made the overall topic

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 5

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jordan Osborne, Illinois State University; Jeritt Williams, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

easier to use, interestingly, studentsreported that they found the physical robots more engaging. This preference likely reflects thehands-on nature of robotics education and the students' predisposition to enjoy said nature oftasks. Despite 84% of participants acknowledging that the VR environment was a reasonablerecreation of their lab space, students noted the inherent differences between controlling a virtualand a real robot. One student stated, “Being there in person and not in VR made you feel moreaccomplished when you finished a task.” Similarly, another student wrote, “Jogging the physicalrobot is more engaging because you have actual consequences with the physical robot. In VR, Iwas engaged because I have little experience in VR.” While

Conference Session

Refining Manufacturing Education Practices

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Hengtao Tang, University of South Carolina; Ramy Harik, University of South Carolina

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

program origin stories,” in ASEE annual conference & exposition, 2019.[3] Deloitte and The Manufacturing Institute, “2018 Manufacturing Skills Gap Study,” Deloitte United States. Accessed: Jul. 01, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/manufacturing/articles/future-of-manufacturing- skills-gap-study.html[4] L. Avendano, J. Renteria, S. Kwon, and K. Hamdan, “Bringing equity to underserved communities through STEM education: implications for leadership development,” Journal of Educational Administration and History, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 66–82, 2019.[5] D. Reider, K. Knestis, and J. Malyn-Smith, “Workforce education models for K-12 STEM education programs: Reflections on, and implications for, the

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 8

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jeritt Williams, Illinois State University; Jaby Mohammed, Illinois State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

focused on a low-cost, customizable module. Team 3 emphasized a versatile, safe designthat is easily adaptable to different lab setups. In many cases, the students also discussed lessonslearned and self-reflected on their development in their oral presentations. The following sectionwill discuss limitations and opportunities for next steps from the faculty instructor’s perspective.Limitations and Next StepsFuture work should consider further refinement and revision of these prototypes. This can bedone in a variety of ways. First, notably absent from this work, is the actual testing of the productbeyond fitment and basic movements with the industrial robot. This is mainly due to timeconstraints in the project term. However, this could be enhanced

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 7

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Oluwadamilola Daniel Afe, Virginia State University; Zhenhua Wu, Virginia State University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

”, which providesnot only an excellent pedagogy resources to educate next generation of engineers on conceptsrelated Industry 4.0., also an outstanding research infrastructure for Smart Manufacturing.AcknowledgementThis work was supported by a subaward from GENEDGE through the Department of Energy GrantNo. DE-MS0000029. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed inthis material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the DOE andGENEDGE.Reference[1] MTConnect® Standard Part 1 - Overview and Protocol, Version 1.3.0, 2014[2] MTConnect®Standard Part 2 –Device Information Model, Version 1.3.1, 2015[3] https://pypi.org/project/requests/[4] https://pypi.org/project/xmltodict/[5] https://pypi.org

Conference Session

Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sajan Saini, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Erik Verlage; Anuradha Murthy Agarwal; Drew Michael Weninger; Samuel Serna Otalvaro; Saif Rayyan; Glenda Simonton Stump, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Trevor Morrisey, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Christian Gabbianelli, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Ira Fay, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Caitlin Feeley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Jeff Bertrand; Bhargav Vipul Upadhyay; Achint Jain; Richard Eberhardt, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Alan R. Kost, University of Arizona; John Ballato, Clemson University; Kapil Chalil Madathil, Clemson University; Sri Priya Sundararajan; Kenan Cicek; Dominic Gastaldo; Judith Perry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Eric Klopfer; Randolph E. Kirchain Jr., Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Richard Roth, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Frank R. Field III, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Moore, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; George Westerman, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Lionel C. Kimerling, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

communications.Learners can access sims (i)-(iii) from anywhere with an internet connection and a standardcomputer to practice the process steps in a safe, repeatable, and effective manner.K7-8 Acculturation: Augmented Reality GamesOur most recent exploration of non-conventional learning tools includes the creation of an ARGgame [23] designed to introduce young-learners (8th grade focus) to the ray optics phenomena ofrefraction, total internal reflection, and light-guiding via straight and curved waveguidecomponents (see Fig. 8). The ARG has been designed as a miniature narrative, which a middle-school educator can independently deploy, instead of requiring specialized game designer staff tooversee. This purposeful ARG-in-a-box methodology is intended to enhance

Conference Session

Manufacturing Division (MFG) Technical Session 6

Collection

2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Zhen Zhao, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; John Liu, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

resources. Paired T-tests confirm that thedesired increases in program design (p-value = 0.034) and program delivery (material) aresignificant (p = 0.034).Figure 3. Average employers’ preferred level of engagement in the PWD program acrossdimensions.Additionally, employers indicated varying levels of desired engagement across the differentdimensions of the PWD program, as illustrated in Figure 3. For instance, they typically prefer tooffer input, suggestions, or teaching materials once every cohort but show a strong desire toconstantly provide ongoing resources and support for employees. This variation underscores thenuanced ways employers want to engage, reflecting how each activity aligns with theirworkforce needs and organizational goals.4.2

Conference Session

Technology Integration in Manufacturing Curriculum

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University; Perihan Fidan, Tennessee Technological University; Suhas S Alkunte, Old Dominion University; Orkhan Huseynov, The University of Alabama in Huntsville; Mohammad Alshaikh Ali, Tennessee Technological University; Vivekanand A Naikwadi, Tennessee Technological University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

manufacturing under guidance of Dr. Fidan. He also works as student manager of iMakerSpace Innovation lab at Tennessee Technological University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Unique Instructional Delivery of Additive Manufacturing: A Holistic ReviewAbstractAdditive Manufacturing (AM), often referred to as 3D Printing (3DP), has emerged as atransformative technology compared to traditional manufacturing across industries such asaerospace, healthcare, and automotive. With this evolution, the demand for specialized educationand training in AM is growing. This brief concept paper provides a condensed review ofdistinctive instructional delivery methods in the field of AM, reflecting the dynamic nature

Conference Session

Redefining Manufacturing Education Practices

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Siqin Dong, Old Dominion University; Mileta Tomovic, Old Dominion University; Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

successful outcome.D. X-ray InspectionAfter the reflow soldering process, the PCB with all of the components is sent for an X-rayinspection test. This test is used to gauge the quality of the solder joints. During the test, x-rayspenetrate the silicon in IC packages and reflect off the metal joints, creating a grayscale imagedepicting metal in a darker hue. This image shows the precision of the solders and whether anydefects exist, such as open solder joints, misaligned parts, or lifted pins beneath the IC packets.The X-ray image of the PCB is then compared to a reference image to identify any differences.If any misalignments are discovered, the component is sent back for repair.MethodsA SimEvents model of PCB assembly process is designed and

Conference Session

Technology Integration in Manufacturing Curriculum

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Yue Zhang, Georgia Southern University; Haijun Gong; Lianjun Wu

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

criteria for accrediting engineering and engineering technologyprograms reflect the importance of standards competence for students. Specifically, the 2023-2024 Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) criterion 5d states, “The curriculum mustinclude a culminating major engineering design experience that 1) incorporates appropriateengineering standards and multiple constraints, and 2) is based on the knowledge and skillsacquired in earlier course work.” [1] Also, the Engineering Technology AccreditationCommission (ETAC) criterion 3 states student outcomes of “an ability to conduct standard tests,measurements, and experiments and to analyze and interpret the results” (3.A.4) and “an abilityto conduct standard tests, measurements, and experiments

Conference Session

Design Experiences in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Sheng-Jen Hsieh, Texas A&M University; Susan Pedersen, Texas A&M University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

more of the things that were positiveand do them even better.Future directions include implementation of the improvements above; development of newmodules focusing on interfacing other devices (such as robots); and development of modulesfocused on industrial applications of automated systems—such as manufacturing systems—tohelp learners see the big picture of how systems are integrated.AcknowledgementsThis material was supported by the National Science Foundation’s Improving UndergraduateSTEM Education (IUSE) Program (award no. 2044449). Any opinions, findings, andconclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do notnecessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.Bibliography[1] Giffi

Conference Session

Virtual and Augmented Reality Application in Manufacturing Education

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Richard Chiou, Drexel University; Isher Singh; Arjuna Karthikeyan Senthilvel Kavitha, Drexel University; Tzu-liang Bill Tseng, University of Texas at El Paso; Md Fashiar Rahman, University of Texas at El Paso; Nijanthan Vasudevan, Drexel University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

components involves strategic utilization ofBlender and SolidWorks software. Blender's “. blend" file format seamlessly integrates into Unity'sassets for designing the fan. SolidWorks-generated components are reimagined in Blender forcompatibility with Unity as shown in Figure 2. The wind turbine model is sourced from the Unity3D Asset Store, providing a pre-built foundation [3].Within Unity 3D, the design process continues with the creation of essential elements, leveragingmesh colliders and scripting for user interaction as shown in Figures 3, 4, 5, and 6. The additionof reflections enhances visual appeal, contributing to a more immersive and realistic userexperience. The design process seamlessly integrates Blender, SolidWorks, and Unity 3D

Conference Session

Project-Based and Experiential Learning in Manufacturing

Collection

2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Akbar M. Eslami, Elizabeth City State University; Kuldeep S Rawat, Elizabeth City State University; Chandra Bhushan Asthana P.E., Elizabeth City State University; Scott Bradshaw, Elizabeth City State University

Tagged Topics

Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Manufacturing Division (MFG)

to comprise anAdditive Manufacturing Skills sub-scale. The content reflects the specific skills identified in theproject design. Students respond using a 6-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Completely Uncertain)to 6 (Completely Certain).Cronbach's coefficient alpha was calculated to assess the internal consistency of each scale. TheEngineering Skills Self-Efficacy sub-scale values were good and consistent with those reportedin previous research. The value was borderline for the newly developed Additive ManufacturingSkills scale, suggesting that the number or content of the items may need to be reviewed.The means for all the scales were above the mid-point, suggesting that students had confidencein their abilities. As more data is collected in