components.Mechatronics is a newer branch of mechanical engineering that is a synergistic combination ofmechanical, electrical, electronics, computer science, control techniques, and informationsystems. Integrating mechatronics content in mechanical engineering curriculum has been achallenge since it has been viewed as a significant deviation from traditional courses. In the past,pedagogical approaches like semester-long, project-based classes, or linking mechatronics toother engineering disciplines, have been used to integrate mechatronics into the mechanicalengineering curriculum, with varying results. Furthermore, teaching an interdisciplinary class ofthis nature within a semester is a difficult pedagogical endeavor. To overcome these issues, thetopics and
Northridge were able to graduate as mechanical engineerstrained to think, design, and operate using system-level skills.Bibliography[1] Kirkpatrick, A., & Danielson, S., ASME VISION 2030’S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MECHANICALENGINEERING EDUCATION. Paper presented at 2012 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition[2] Youssef, G., & Kabo, J. M., Machine Design: Redesigned Paper presented at 2015 ASEE AnnualConference and Exposition[3] Katz, R., Integrating Analysis and Design in Mechanical Engineering Education Procedia CIRP, Volume36, 2015[4] Towhidnejad, M., & Hillburn, T., An Overview of GRCSE: Graduate Reference Curriculum for SystemsEngineering Paper presented at World Congress on Engineering Education 2013[5] Lee, T
. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Work in Progress: Sustainable Engineering Education in Mechanical Engineering Curriculum Dr. Huihui Qi, Grand Valley State UniversityIntroductionSustainable development is a global goal nowadays. Engineers play an unreplaceable role in theglobal sustainable development. As a result, the importance of sustainable engineering educationhas been widely recognized by engineering educators. In addition, ABET [1] has two studentsoutcome criteria for sustainability: students should have (c) an ability to design a system,component or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic,environmental, social, political, ethical
these quickly developing requirements comes an expectation of employeeexperience and skill sets. For individuals seeking a career in mechanical engineering, movingforward with the tools necessary for success in this continuously evolving world begins withhigher education. This paper is the first of a three-part series to report on the progress of BoiseState University’s Mechanical and Biomedical Engineering Department’s mission to implementa revolutionized curriculum in their academic program. This paper will describe theestablishment of goals and processes used to design a curriculum that will provideundergraduates with an effective foundation for the future. Integrating a change of thismagnitude necessitated consideration of a multitude of
been focused on teaching junior and senior engineering design classes as well as educational and curriculum development. He is coordinator of the first new ME-Practice course in the revised Mechanical Engineering curriculum and faculty advisor of the Mining INnovation Enterprise.Dr. Nancy B. Barr, Michigan Technological University As the Communications and Senior Design Program Advisor, Barr developed a multi-faceted technical communications program in the Mechanical Engineering-Engineering Mechanics Department at MTU. She delivers communication instruction to undergraduate and graduate students, assists faculty in crafting critical thinking/communication assignments, and trains GTAs and faculty in best practices in
tools and equipment that can’t be locked downthroughout the curriculum. For example, the freshmen might only need to use PVC cutters andsand paper, while juniors are expected to be able to use the band saw and drill press forfabrication tasks. These tools and skills are taught to students in small groups by Design StudioTAs during class time as needed.4 Impact on StudentsThe impact of the Design Studio on our undergraduate population was assessed as a subcategoryof outcomes in our Department’s standard alumni survey, which is administered approximatelyevery five years as part of the ABET accreditation process. In fall 2015, an online survey wasdistributed to all alumni of the department, both graduate and undergraduate, with active
forquestions during class and asked to submit any MPs to an online forum for every lecture withany questions or confusing concepts that would be reviewed by the instructor and addressed atthe start of the following class. Asking students to write down what was least clear to them is a potentially powerful integrative exercise because it requires students to identify any misconceptions or difficulties they may be having with the material, opening a dialogue with the instructor and allowing students to a more profound learning outcome. Finally, for (7) engaging in experiential learning, the lecture materials offered heavy contextualization, such as emphasizing group work that related to real- world engineering problems. Implementation Surveys
. Whenthis tool is properly integrated with effective pedagogies of engagement (like problem-basedlearning, or experiment-based learning), it can enhance students’ achievement of learning goalsand the development of essential skills such as teamwork, creativity, and digital skills. Also,online collaboration can facilitate peer assessment and peer learning. While it was found thatMiro was an effective learning tool in an engineering laboratory-intensive course, the smallsample size makes for the fact that these results cannot be generalized. A follow-up study withmore participants is required.ConclusionOur study confirms that Miro can be easily employed to facilitate effective online collaboration,thus enhancing student engagement. This is deemed to
, if not expertise in, each of the four mechatroniccomponents.The course described in this paper, MSE 5183 Mechatronic Systems I at Lawrence Tech, servesas an entry-level graduate course for students enrolled in the Lawrence Tech Master of Sciencein Mechatronic Systems Engineering (MSMSE) program as well as a technical elective forundergraduate students in Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineering, and BiomedicalEngineering. For many undergraduate and graduate students, this course serves as a firstexperience with the integration of sensors, actuators, and microcontrollers. Control theory is notintroduced but is instead offered in subsequent courses.Mechatronic Design ProjectBefore discussing course modifications and assessment, the
through project-based assignments. Students were askedif the assignments had helped them in enhancing their technical writing and oral communicationskills and if the assignments promoted teamwork and better relationship building amongst peers.In all three categories, approximately 55-64% of the students agreed that the project-basedassignments enhanced these soft-skills. Development of these skills are also an integral part ofthe learning outcomes outlined by the ABET accreditation board. 1 1 3 0 100 Strongly 23
coaster project allows students to investigate and creatively apply their analytic skillsto an ambiguous, real-world problem that they are highly motivated to explore. It both reinforcesthe underlying curriculum and also helps students develop intellectually, as the project isdesigned to teach that dynamics isn’t so much about looking for the “right answer” as it is aboutchoices and simplifications made in modeling reality.Although roller coaster design projects have been used as the basis for entire undergraduatecourses and also in STEM activities for pre-college students, the author is unaware of a similarproject being included as part of a first course in dynamics. For this project, students in teams ofthree were tasked with designing
packages are widely used in industry thereby making exposure to thistool an essential component of undergraduate engineering education. This paper discusses thedevelopment, implementation, and results of integrating active learning modules (ALM’s)throughout an engineering curriculum with the goal of providing an effective learning resourcethat reinforces fundamental, yet challenging, course concepts without requiring knowledge of therigorous mathematical theory underlying the finite element method. Fifteen ALM’s have beenimplemented into eight courses at six different universities; this paper focuses on four ALM’sthat have been implemented at the University of the Pacific for several years thereby providing asignificant amount of data. Assessment
Mechanism Design app for iOS and Android platforms developed indigenously andincorporated in this class as a technology enabler (Fig 1). The MotionGen enables students toperform kinematic design of planar four-bar linkage mechanisms that can execute desired paths ormotions. In the recent years, Engineering educators havemandated an introduction of design concepts, in-novation, entrepreneurship, and projects early ina student’s education, promote teamwork, and in-troduce modern engineering tools. The NationalAcademy of Engineer’s “The Engineer of 2020”report concludes that the passive, lecture-based in-struction should be replaced or supplemented byactive, integrated, project-based learning with sig-nificant design component.2, 3 It is not
integration of previous theoretical knowledge. Besidesthe technical aspects, the group of students must secure funds by contacting sponsors andnegotiating with them. The projects provide a good motivation for the students and an excellenttool for assuring knowledge integration, team work, management experience, and self-confidentstudents, plus a way to obtain funds for investment into quality teaching3. Intercollegiate designprojects are a great means to engage students in engineering design projects beyond the curriculum,where they put their coursework into practice. Design competitions give the students hands-onexperience as well as build student enthusiasm. The experience of designing, building and testinga vehicle gives the students a real world
early museumaround the world and you will come upon artifacts holding scientific, artistic, and historicalimportance largely created by persons who apprenticed under others in their community. Eventoday, training in trades (e.g., bricklayer, carpenter) relies on apprenticeship. In academia,apprenticeship performs an integral role in many pedagogical activities and continues to evolve.In the last decade, there has been a focused shift to improve pedagogy, especially for STEMdisciplines. 3, 4 In order to compete in a rapidly changing, globalized world, educators need tocritically reexamine what skills engineers and scientists need in the future – and then designlearning environments that cultivate those skills. Our review of the literature
Paper ID #14448Design, Build, and Installation of an Automated Bike Rental System as a Partof Capstone DesignDr. Scott F. Kiefer, York College of Pennsylvania Scott Kiefer has spent the past fifteen years teaching mechanical engineering at four institutions. As an exemplary teaching specialist in mechanical engineering at Michigan State University, Scott received the Withrow Award for Teaching Excellence, given to one faculty member in the College in Engineering for outstanding instructional performance. Scott specializes in machine design, vibrations and controls, and mechatronics. He started his career at the University
School of Engineering at Grand Valley State Uni- versity. He received his BSE and MSE degrees in Aerospace Engineering at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University and his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering at the University of Cincinnati. His research inter- ests are in the thermo-fluids area and also focuses on promoting graduate education among undergraduate students via research collaborations. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 The Effectiveness of Dimples on a NACA Airfoil: A Numerical Investigation Conducted via an Independent StudyAbstractThis paper integrates research and education in an effort to enhance the critical thinking
designer in the Russ College of Engineering and Technology at Ohio University, Athens, Ohio. She works with faculty to design and redesign courses while following best practices in technology integration. Her research interests include learning aptitudes and facilitating class- room communication. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Interdisciplinary Project-Based Service Learning and Action Research Project with Mechanical Engineering and Speech-Language Pathology StudentsAbstractThe current paper addresses an imminent need for an action research study to systematicallyinvestigate the effectiveness of an interprofessional project-based service
. Students in the BSME program complete a rigorous,project-based curriculum [7] designed to engage students in the engineering design-build-testprocess during all four years of undergraduate study. Program highlights include small classsizes, access to faculty, and an integrated study abroad option.The University of Evansville has implemented both admissions processes mentioned in theintroduction. Students entering the program directly from high school must meet admissioncriteria for ME Lower Division. After completing the required Lower Division courses with agrade of C- or better, students must apply for ME Upper Division status to complete the final twoyears of study.Lower DivisionLower Division is classified as the first two years of
depends strongly on theparticular design project selected.Capstone projects are an important component in the engineering curriculum that combinevarious aspects of students’ learning into an integrated team project to address real-world,complex problems. Capstone projects frequently involve multiple elements including design,simulation, fabrication, validation, and cost analysis. This complexity requires system thinkingand can easily become interdisciplinary [1, 2]. Due to reporting requirements, interaction withcustomers and sponsors, and collaboration among different team members, these projects alsoprovide an excellent opportunity for practicing and improving written and oral communicationskills [3]. Capstone projects are considered an
Apply systematic design procedures to open-ended problems Design solutions to meet desired needs Test potential solutions to an engineering problem Apply engineering skills and tools (e.g., software, experimentation, measurement devices) in engineering practice Integrate engineering skills and tools to solve real-world problems Consider contemporary issues (economic, environmental, technical, etc.) at the local, national, and world levelsData Import and CleaningPre- and post-survey responses were downloaded in comma delimited format (CSV) as bothcharacter and numeric data. The primary difference between the two formats are thetransformation of Likert-type scales (i.e. No ability, Some
the current state of technology byperforming research on an engineering topic, communication skills, lifelong learning, etc.A survey was conducted with participants of the workshop and students who did not participateas participation in the workshop were voluntary. The survey questions were carefully prepared todetermine whether there is a correlation between how students view the importance ofprofessional skills and if they are satisfied with how the current engineering curriculum ishelping them develop professional skills.Literature Review:The Tandon School of Engineering of New York University developed a series of workshopscalled Student to Scholar, to prepare students with professional skills [2]. A survey wasconducted after the workshop
description of thesecourses to include the topics covered in the training sessions, thus making them an essential partof the course content.What We Hope to Achieve: We want to expose our students, faculty, and staff to inclusion anddiversity issues of which they might not be aware. By requiring students to go through training inboth the sophomore and seniors years, we hope to achieve maximum impact. The early exposureas sophomores will give the students a chance to apply the concepts they learn throughout theiracademic careers, while the second round of training as seniors will serve as a refresher coursebefore they begin their team-based senior projects and, later, enter the engineering workforce.We specifically designed this training curriculum to
laboratory equipment has been found to be robust and durablegiven being subjected to undergraduate students performing hands-on experiments of complextheories often for the first time. An overview of some of the experiments which have been used Page 26.833.5in the curriculum in various course offerings is provided in Table 1. Table 1: ECP Systems Experiments [1-3] 205 210 220 System Identification X X X Rigid Body PD and PID Control X X X Disturbance Rejection
Lafayette Amy S. Van Epps is an associate professor of Library Science and Engineering Librarian at Purdue Uni- versity. She has extensive experience providing instruction for engineering and technology students, including Purdue’s first-year engineering program. Her research interests include finding effective meth- ods for integrating information literacy knowledge into the undergraduate engineering curriculum. Prof. Van Epps has a BA in engineering science from Lafayette College, her MSLS from Catholic University of America, a M.Eng. in Industrial Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and is currently working on her PhD in Engineering Education at Purdue.Dr. Michael Thomas SmithDr. Sorin Adam Matei
country.MethodsTo develop team-based learning curriculum and its evaluation in Japanese engineering education,we first replicated Ohashi’s survey [2], “What is an Engineer?.” The answers to the questionnairereflect the sociocultural value of engineering in Japan from the perspective of future engineers. Morespecifically, we asked a hundred freshmen in the Department of Mechanical and SystemsEngineering at Kogakuin University, the following question, “Who do you associate with the word‘Engineer’? Please write down the names of three people. If the person is not popular, please add abrief explanation.”In response to the lack of interdisciplinarity in the pipelines of our default educational system, wedeveloped a high-quality interdisciplinary curriculum for
. 2014) due to the flexibility afforded to individual studentsfor engaging with the curriculum. Various approaches are adopted to improve student participation, suchas integration of quizzes in the instructional lectures, use of discussion boards, and offering synchronousreview sessions. One of the aims of our study is to identify the elements of the online course with whichstudents more effectively engage.Safe Environment for Discussion: the establishment of a safe platform to share and discuss questions isessential to the success of online courses. Instructors can foster a safe environment by encouragingparticipation and creating pathways for students to discuss their challenges and questions throughout theirstudies. It is the instructor’s
, “On the development ofa professional identity: Engineering persisters vs. engineering switchers,” Proceedings ofFrontiers in Education Conference, San Antonio, TX: FIE, 2009.[14] S. E. Cross, and N. V. Vick, “The Interdependent Self-Construal and Social Support: TheCase of Persistence,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 27(7), pp.820-832, 2001.[15] A. L. Kristof, “Person-Organization Fit: An Integrative Review of its Conceptualizations,Measurement, and Implications,” Personnel Psychology, vol. 49(1), pp.1-49, 1996.[16] O. Pierrakos, N. A. Curtis, and R. Anderson, “How salient is the identity of engineeringstudents? On the use of the Engineering Student Identity Survey,” Proceedings of Frontiers inEducation Conference, Erie, PA
in the engineering department by a mechanical engineering faculty member, who’sresearch background is in computational fluid dynamics. The curriculum employs many of thenewer pedagogical approaches including a pseudo flipped classroom4, Process-Oriented GuidedInquiry Learning (POGIL) method5, clicker questions, and kinesthetic lectures6. In addition,traditional techniques are still used such as an abbreviated, concise board lectures and hand-written exams.Aside from the peer learning methods implemented and discussed in this paper, the othersignificant change that was made from Spring 2013 to Spring 2014 is the total amount of in-classcontact hours. As of Spring 2014, the course meets twice per week for 1 hour and 50 minutes,which is an
. J., 2005, “The Role of the Laboratory in Undergraduate Engineering Education,” Journalof Engineering Education, 94, p. 121-130.11. Steif, P., & Dollar, A. 2004, Reinventing The Teaching Of Statics, ASEE Annual Conference, Salt Lake City,Utah12. Kaul, S., & Sitaram, P. 2013, Curriculum Design of Statics and Dynamics: An Integrated Scaffolding andHands-on Approach ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, Georgia.13. Ramming, C. H., & Phillips, J. J., 2014, June, Improving Retention of Student Understanding by Use of Hands-on Experiments in Statics ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana.14. Hennessey, M., 2008, Statics and Dynamics Projects Emphasizing Introductory Design and Manufacturing, inProc. ASEE Annual Conf. & Expo