Paper ID #28985Toward the Development of a Scale Linking Underrepresented EngineeringFaculty’s Workplace Experiences & Career OutcomesDr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Tech Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University. London is a mixed methods researcher with interests in research impact, cyberlearning, and instructional change in STEM Education. Prior to being a faculty member, London worked at the National Science Foundation, GE Healthcare, and Anheuser-Busch. She earned B.S. and M.S. degrees in Industrial Engineering, and a
(TRB) Committee on Aircraft/Airport Compatibility and is a past member of the TRB Committees on Traffic Flow and Characteristics and Transportation Network Modeling. Stephen is also a member of the Ameri- can Society for Engineering Education (ASEE).Dr. Anne Nordberg, The University of Texas at ArlingtonProf. Wei Wayne Li, Texas Southern UniversityProf. Hanadi S. Rifai P.E., University of Houston ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 An Exploratory Study of Intentionality towards Diversity in STEM Faculty Hiring (Research) Abstract Despite efforts over the past few decades to promote diversity and foster
Paper ID #29030WIP: Mitigating Transfer Shock for Undergraduates in Engineering toIncrease DiversityMrs. Claire Duggan, Northeastern University Claire Duggan is the Director of The Center for STEM Education at Northeastern University. While serving in this role she has supported the design and implementation of multiple National Science Foun- dation initiatives including but not limited to ATE, GK12, ITEST, REU, RET, S-STEM, and STEP grant initiatives.Ms. Rachelle Reisberg, Northeastern University Rachelle Reisberg is the Assistant Dean for for Undergraduate Curriculum and Students in the College of Science at
, Boulder Dr. Wendy Chi is director of ABC Research & Evaluation, as well as a research analyst at Jefferson County Public Schools in Colorado. Dr. Chi holds a Ph.D. in Educational Foundations, Policy, and Practice from the University of Colorado at Boulder. Her research interests include educational equity and access for underrepresented students, with a specific focus on underrepresentation in STEM. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020Developing Meaningful Studies of Student Success with Equity in Mind –Considering Context (Experience Report)AbstractThe National Science Foundation Scholarships in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math(S-STEM) grants are designed to support
-serving community college hasestablished a scholarship program for financially vulnerable community college students whowish to move to a four-year university to obtain a bachelor's degree in a STEM field. Developedthrough a S-STEM grant NSF Scholarship, the program included cooperation between STEMteachers, college employees, administrators, student organizations and industry partners, four-year colleges, local high schools and professional organizations. In addition to providingfinancial support, student access to academic capital was enhanced by an intensive math reviewprogram, tutoring, study groups, additional training, and internship opportunities for research.Access to cultural and social capital was increased by providing scholars with
as an Assistant Professor.Dr. Anidza Valent´ın-Rodr´ıguez, University of Puerto Rico, Mayaguez Campus c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Success Expectations of Low-Income Academically Talented Students in Engineering - A Preliminary Study at a Hispanic- Serving InstitutionIntroductionThis paper describes findings on interviews conducted with Hispanic engineering studentsinterested in participating in an S-STEM fellowship program at the University of Puerto Rico,Mayagüez Campus (UPRM). The program seeks to increase the retention, persistence, andsuccess of Low-Income Academically Talented Students (LIATS) at the College of Engineering(CoE). The
]. New SCCT models were developed to explain vocational satisfaction and well-being [10,11], and career management [9]. At the core of the original SCCT model, and most of the SCCTmodels that followed, are self-efficacy (i.e., confidence in the ability to successfully perform adomain-specific task, like a specific engineering skill), outcome expectations (i.e., anticipatedoutcomes of a particular behavior), interests (i.e., patterns of likes/dislikes for career activities),and goals (i.e., determination for a particular outcome). Taking this one step further, Lent etal.’s [9] integrative social cognitive model of academic adjustment, derived from both SCCT [1,2] and the social cognitive model of academic satisfaction [10, 11], explains how
-profit STEM diversity organization, nation-wide chapter development, reporting, andcompliance program is presented. In the late 2000’s, the program transitioned from the End-of-Year Report (EOYR) to the National Report Program (NRP). Throughout the 2010’s, SHPEunderwent internal infrastructure changes, including an inter-organizational merger, to expand andbetter fulfill its mission to serve the Hispanic community. In turn, the NRP underwent changesfrom the EOYR to via Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats analysis. The currentiteration supplements on the former by targeting chapter growth, development, and managementthrough a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) workforce-preparednesseducational framework. The program has
essential for the engineering education community to be knowledgeable of the experiencesof this group in engineering. Using critical race theory and intersectionality frameworks, thisstudy utilizes quantitative and qualitative data to examine the reasons that influenced Blackwomen to leave their engineering positions. Engineering graduates of a large public Midwesternuniversity were surveyed. Ten of the 3,807 graduates identified as a woman and Black or AfricanAmerican. Participants provided information on their career trajectories, including informationon their position(s) held and the reasons that influenced them to leave. Reasons that influencedBlack Women engineers to leave their engineering positions are presented. Preliminary analysesand
the ADVANCE program, although strides have been made at the undergraduatelevel, yet the number of M.S. and Ph.D.’s awarded to underrepresented groups has not increasedappreciably since the mid 1990s [3], [4]. For instance, between 1997 and 2017, the number ofHispanic undergraduates grew from 14% to 24% whereas Hispanic faculty only increased from3% to 5% during the same time frame [5]. Zellers et al. [6] reported in 2008 that less than 10%of the full professors in sciences were women and only 3% of assistant and associate professorswere African American.There were 12,156 doctoral degrees were awarded with Native Americans earning 0.3% of thePh.D.’s, Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders 0.6%, African Americans 4.2%, Hispanics 6% and women23.6% in 2018
, 2019.[2] J. G. Wells, “STEM Education: The Potential of Technology Education,” in 95th Annual Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference, 2008.[3] M. ElZomor, C. Mann, K. D. Snitker, K. Parrish, M. Chester“Leveraging Vertically Integrated Courses and Problem-Based Learning to Improve Students ’ Performance and Skills,” J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract. ASCE, vol. 144, no. 1, 2018.[4] S. Portz, “The Challenges of STEM Education,” 43rd Sp. Congr., vol. 2015, 2015.[5] M. Brzozowy et al., “Making STEM education attractive for young people by presenting key scientific challenges and their impact on our life and career perspectives,” INTED2017 Proc., pp. 9948–9957, 2017.[6] M. ElZomor, K. Parrish, C
, Takeaway(s)/Experience(s), and Program Review. Quotesrelating to the primary theme of connectedness were extracted and interpreted. In addition, theword “network” was a common theme in the responses, and relates to connectedness in abusiness sense, so the quotes were re-read to point out any mention of networking in theMotivation category, where it primarily appeared. Table 2 Qualitative Questions 1. What is your academic status? 2. What was your primary goal in attending this conference? 3. What have you learned during your time in the program? 4. What has been the most memorable part of your program experience? 5. What do you like about the [YU?] Program
studentrelatedness, competence, and trust guide faculty to the culminating experience of the training--identifying a “systemic inquiry project” for a course selected by the faculty member (Salazar andMartinez Berryhill, 2019).On the last day of the institute, faculty are assigned to coaching teams and directed to define asystemic inquiry project which they can implement in a course in the following semester. Thisproject constitutes the second program element--a practical application of CRP in course(s)relevant to the faculty member.The coaching teams meet with faculty throughout the following semester to support faculty intheir projects by sharing progress and providing accountability. When faculty complete theirprojects, they present the results, including
increases culturalcompetence and creates a graduate experience that enhances the success of diverse andinclusive graduates and future faculty: A variety of initiatives have been identified to addressdepartment concerns: (1) Develop a mentor-mentee work/communication styles learning moduleinto the graduate program core course required for all new graduate students, (2) Host aworkshop on how to write and evaluate a job application diversity statement that will trainfaculty and graduate students, (3) Develop a peer mentoring program for graduate students, and(4) Provide conference travel funds for graduate student(s) and/or faculty member(s) toparticipant in a conference URM program/event, (4) To revisit the doctoral qualifyingexamination in
:(please include the specific geographic location(s))What motivated you in college? What motivates you at ? What mattersWhat did you aspire to become? to you?What mattered to you? What do you aspire to become? What was it like coming to the fromWhat was it like coming to from your your high school and/or community, socially andhigh school/community socially and academically? How academically? How did you manage each aspect of thedid you manage each aspect of the transition
and Engineering website [4]shows the distribution of international students attending higher education institutions within theUnited States in 2018. This graphic tries to illustrate the country or economy of origin for foreignstudents and gives approximate numbers of students from that region. For example, there is more than200,000 Chinese students attending higher education in the United States. This graphic indicates that UShigher education is the system of choice for science and engineering students from around the world. Figure 1: International students enrolled in U. S. higher education institutions, by region, country, or economy of origin: 2018This student selection should be
males, however the males were aware of what the productwas and how it was generally used. Each group was given a handout with seven questions listedhere: 1. How does a hair dryer work? 2. Label the relevant parts of the following image [5] 3. The fan pulls quiescent air from the outside and moves it through the front nozzle. If there is 1 kg/s of air brought in and the air moves at a rate of 10 m/s through the nozzle, how much energy is required to run the fan? It can be assumed that you are holding the dryer horizontally, and atmospheric pressure occurs throughout. 4. If you wanted to increase the speed of the air exiting the hair dryer, how would you change the design? Think of more
Societal Impact and Increase Diversity in Bioengineering.” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Columbus, OH. (2017) [05] M. Mollica, H. Feldner, A. Caspi, K. Steele, S. Israel, and D.G. Hendricks. “Toy Adaptation for Recruitment of Underrepresented Students to Bioengineering.” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Salt Lake City, UT. (2018) [06] M.Y. Mollica, A.M. Spomer, B.M. Goodwin, S. Israel, A. Caspi, H.A. Feldner, K.M. Steele, and D.G. Hendricks. “Engagement in Practice: Toy Adaptation for Children with Disabilities: Engaging the Community through Educational Outreach and Toy Donation”, American Society for
an era of constrained resources, it is far more cost-effective tosystematically replicate effective solution(s); when programs rise to the fore with strong, provenresults, it makes sense to ask whether that success can be institutionalized, reproduced, scaled up,or customized to new settings. In an effort to facilitate the transfer of knowledge aboutsuccessful implementation of strategies and approaches, as well as about evidence-basedpractices, from one state institution to another, this article describes the process of developingand adopting these two programs to support URMs at one state-funded institution.According to the Council of Graduate School’s 2015 Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attritionand Completion Report, “the problem of
] Johnson, M.J., & Sheppard, S. D. (2004). Relationships between engineering students and faculty demographicsand stakeholders working to affect change. Journal of Engineering Education, 93, 139-151.[2] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year singleinstitution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(2), 225-246.[3] Besterfield-Sacre, M., Moreno, M., Shuman, L. J., & Atman, C. J. (2001). Gender and ethnicity differences infreshmen engineering student attitudes: A cross-institutional study. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 477-489.[4] Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: Amulti-year, multi-institution
for Working Families (IIWF) report [3] recommendsaligning education systems with economic development initiatives. Advanced manufacturing andengineering disciplines have key roles in the state of Indiana and the nation’s economic growth.By increasing the number of graduates in both MET and SM, this project supports and enhancesthe economic growth within the state and nationally. Also, being involved in the co-curricularactivities and industry partnerships will help the students improve the very skills the workplacedemands and build on the initial support provided by the scholarship to produce highlyemployable graduates.BackgroundIn fall of 2009, ISU was awarded its first S-STEM program (NSF #0966219) and initially had anundergraduate
possibilities and building a platform for bilingual people to use their uniquevoice, it might encourage the individual to start creating engineering knowledge in differentlanguages to maintain inclusivity among bilingual audiences.AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1826354. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this materialare those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundationReferences[1] P. Levitt and B. N. Jaworsky, "Transnational migration studies: Past developments and future trends," Annu. Rev. Sociol., vol. 33, pp. 129-156, 2007.[2] P. Sánchez and G. S. Kasun, "Connecting
the 4+1program. Another supplementary question was asked to the remaining 16% of students (whowere still not interested following the explanation of the program), to select the reason/s behindtheir decision. Their answers were as follows: 12% due to limited funding, 18% because theyhave not heard or thought about it before, 18% not interested in graduate school, 44% prefergaining experience in industry before pursuing an advanced degree, and the remaining 9% hadlisted other responses.Students were also asked to explain if they recognize any advantages to the program and toexplain why. Approximately 95% of the respondents perceived an advantage to the programwhile the remaining 5% either mentioned that they did not see any advantages to the
community was purposefully expanded to include center and university, parents andwomen of color in STEM to further improve the self-efficacy of the girls [27], [28].MethodologyThis research is part of a larger exploratory, longitudinal, 2-year mixed methods study. Theinitial phase was focused on unveiling areas of challenge in student perception, CT thinkingpractices, and STEM +CT integration. Student voice was optimized to help refine and evolve theintegration of STEM and the CT activities. CT thinking practices were pulled by the universityresearch team from Weintrop et al.’s Taxonomy of CT [15]. Those practices include DataCollection, Data Creation, Understanding a System as a Whole, Understanding the RelationshipBetween Parts of a System
Section 2, the first step above (Establishing the Criteria) is also implemented in the control group, i.e. Section 1. II. List the Criteria in an Online Survey Following the class activity on Day 1, and using the list generated under task interdependence, the instructor creates a survey asking each student to self- identify their potential contribution to the project group, as well as their gender, race, and other aspects of their personality (e.g. collectivism vs. individualism, source(s) of motivation, view on engineering and social justice, etc.). In keeping with the spirit of Potosky and Duck [8], this survey should give
across the US, on average, nearly 40% of students leaveengineering before graduation. This rate is much higher for URM and female engineeringstudents with 70%, 70%, and 50% of female, black and Hispanic students respectively. It is notsurprising that there is a disproportionate representation of the overall URM population and theirrepresentation in the STEM workforce (Figure 1). As shown in Figure 1, Hispanics and Blacks account for approx. 15% and 12% of the USresidential population 21 years or older in 2015, yet they account for only 6% and 5% of thescience and engineering occupation (National Science Board, 2018). U.S. S&E Workforce with a College Degree 70 60 50 40 30 20
. Throughoutthese assessment analysis, it reveals that the workshop can be further improved by designing andimplementing target specified activities (e.g., research oriented vs. career oriented) to servecohorts at different levels.AcknowledgementThis work is funded by USDA National Institution of Food and Agriculture, grant number: 2017-38821-26419.Reference[1] Office of Institutional Research (2019) Central State University Fact Book, 2019 Edition.[2] Mälkki, H. and Alanne (2017) An overview of life cycle assessment (LCA) and research-based teaching in renewable and sustainable energy education, Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews, 69, 218 – 231.[3] Dekker, H. and Wolff, S. W. “Re-inventing Research-Based Teaching and Learning”,European Forum for
/ [Accessed February 1, 2020].[4] J. L. Wood, “Four Hiring Strategies for Increasing Faculty Diversity,” Available:https://diverseeducation.com/article/149878/ [Accessed January 15, 2020].[5] J. Briggs, “Perceptions of African-American Faculty at a Predominantly White College abouttheir Institutions Hiring Policies,” Ed.D. Dissertation, Edgewood College, 2017.[6] E. O. McGee, W. H. Robinson, L. C. Bentley and S. L. Houston, “Diversity Stalled:Explorations into the Stagnant Numbers of African American Engineering Faculty,” 122 ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Paper ID #11934, 2015.[7] M. Currie, “Success Factors of Black Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsFaculty at Predominantly White Institutions,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Mercer
, and Brownell, Sara E, “Buildingbetter bridges into stem: A synthesis of 25 years of literature on stem summer bridgeprograms,” CBE Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 4, p. es3, 1/12/2017.[9] Tomasko, David L, Ridgway, Judith S, Waller, Rocquel J, and Olesik, Susan V, “Researchand Teaching: Association of Summer Bridge Program Outcomes with STEM Retention ofTargeted Demographic Groups,” Journal of College Science Teaching, vol. 45, no. 4, 3/2016.[10] B. Nemelka, J. Askeroth, and J. Harbor, “Summer Start: Supporting Success forConditionally Admitted Students in a Summer Bridge Program,” Summer Academe: A Journal ofHigher Education, vol. 11, pp. 1–13, Feb. 2018.[11] J. L. Taylor and T. Harmon, “Bridge Programs in Illinois: Results of the 2010