this ratherunpleasant situation, how may young faculty members of the Arab Gulf Region,overcome these difficulties and survive in this maelstrom of indecisiveness anduncertainty? What is the role of the institution in assisting young faculty inovercoming the initial hurdles at the start of their journey?The paper addresses issues and concerns that beset the majority of young engineeringfaculty in the Arab Gulf Region at the start of their academic career, and argues thatthe introduction, early on, of “well thought out” professional development strategiesof engineering educators would raise their self-confidence as teachers and help inequipping them with the tools they need in disseminating knowledge in theclassroom. This does not mean that
engineering students not seeing the value of reflection, especially in relation to their engineering courses and future career. When students do not see the value of reflection, they may not take it seriously, which in turn makes it difficult for educators to incorporate reflection activities in classrooms. Some educators related this problem to the idea that reflection may be new to many engineering students and because students have not done it before [e.g. Arizona State University FG08, Bellevue College FG07, Bellevue College FG10, Clarkson University FG01]. Educators employed different techniques to help students see the value of reflection and below we present the more salient tips: Provide clear description. Many
companies in the island. Graduate school is also an option as all engineeringspecialties have well-established graduate programs and many prestigious engineering schools inthe continental US come to recruit students, offering full scholarships to the most qualifiedgraduates. Besides, large companies and consulting firms in the US participate in the annual jobfair by the hundreds, in search for qualified Hispanic engineers. Research wise, three fourths ofits faculty has Ph.D. degrees from the most prestigious American and European engineeringschools. The UPRM has a research-oriented culture that resonates in society due to a history ofacademic success, having several NSF’s CAREER awardees among its engineering juniorfaculty and several department
, become demoralized, thus adversely affecting outcome. Given this ratherunpleasant situation, how may young faculty members of the Arab Gulf Region,overcome these difficulties and survive in this maelstrom of indecisiveness anduncertainty? What is the role of the institution in assisting young faculty inovercoming the initial hurdles at the start of their journey?The paper addresses issues and concerns that beset the majority of young engineeringfaculty in the Arab Gulf Region at the start of their academic career, and argues that Page 25.993.3the introduction, early on, of “well thought out” professional development strategiesof engineering educators
university is an extremelyrewarding career choice and this paper concludes by discussing some of the positive experienceswhich were also not anticipated but experienced. By confronting these topics in a frank andpublic manner others may learn from these collective experiences and perhaps find themselvesbetter prepared when they arise.Academic Misconduct Page 24.681.2Aspiring instructors should be aware that academic misconduct (i.e. cheating) is rampant inengineering and many professors are faced with it every year, if not every semester. Thisproblem is ubiquitous and even occurs at highly selective schools such as Harvard7 andvenerable military
, “Interactive Learning Using A Spiral Approach In A Large Required First Year Mechanical Engineering Class,” Jun. 2010, p. 15.789.1- 15.789.25, Accessed: Nov. 12, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/interactive- learning-using-a-spiral-approach-in-a-large-required-first-year-mechanical-engineering- class.[30] J. Everett, J. Chen, S. Farrell, and J. Kadlowec, “Clickers And Freshman Engineering Clinic,” Jun. 2008, p. 13.297.1-13.297.10, Accessed: Nov. 12, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/clickers-and-freshman-engineering-clinic.[31] T. Eschenbach, N. Lewis, G. M. Nicholls, and J. M. Pallis, “The Impact of Clickers on Your Classroom and Your Career,” Jun. 2013, p. 23.1205.1-23.1205.13
partnerships funded through NSF as wellas the stressing of convergence research represent highly impactful strategies.In this contribution, we highlight the approaches taken by an interdisciplinary team of scholarsincluding two early-career scholars and their mentors who form the Renaissance Foundry ResearchGroup (RFRG, the “core team”) as related to seeking and obtaining grant funding as applied toadvancing engineering education. Of particular emphasis is the “scaling of teams” which herein isdefined as the process of knowing when to and actually bringing in additional scholarly voices (i.e.,upscaling) or moving forward just with the core team (i.e., downscaling) to support these activitiesas related to various funding opportunities. As part of this
, Regarding grading, I often find it useful to retroactively change disasters into extra-credit opportunities. That is, I explain that the problem won't count against anyone's grade, but that those students who managed against all odds to solve (or make substantial headway toward solving) a very difficult (or impossible) problem will be rewarded with extra-credit points.Students should not expect assignments to be perfect. Several instructors made the point that inthe real world, requirements are incompletely specified, change during the project, etc. As KathyRoberson9 put it, Up front, and several times during the semester, I explain to my students that they are preparing for a career where they will frequently be
National Engineering Award in 2003, the highest honor given by AAES. In 2002 she was named the Distinguished Engineering Educator by the Society of Women Engineers. Her awards are based on her mentoring of students, especially women and underrepresented minority students, and her research in the areas of recruitment and retention. A SWE and ASEE Fellow, she is a frequent speaker on career opportunities and diversity in engineering. Page 14.825.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Keeping in Touch with Your Class: Short Class EvaluationsAbstractEspecially for a beginning or fairly new
some pointin the undergraduate career. However, the full benefits of teamwork are not always realized informal project teams. In fact, it is not uncommon for engineering students to complete workindividually and then force fit the pieces together the night before a deadline. Some formalproject teams do work extremely well, providing educational benefits that are unlikely to berealized by students working alone. However, those teams that students develop outside theclassroom, with or without the help of a faculty member, can be just as important for supportinglearning, engagement, and other academic outcomes as more formal project teams organized byfaculty or instructors for specific purposes in individual courses.BackgroundAcademic project
, improving accessibility and creating novel methods that encourage new learning opportunities and foster vibrant learning communities.Prof. Karin Jensen, University of Illinois at Urbana - Champaign Karin Jensen, Ph.D. is a Teaching Assistant Professor in bioengineering at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Her research interests include student mental health and wellness, engineering stu- dent career pathways, and engagement of engineering faculty in engineering education research. She was awarded a CAREER award from the National Science Foundation for her research on undergraduate mental health in engineering programs. Before joining UIUC she completed a post-doctoral fellowship at Sanofi Oncology in
-- INTERVIEWER: Yeah, I see. YI105: Which I think is very relevant for future career stuff, to interact with people who -- who -- yeah, I mean have really good intentions, but maybe have slightly different view that to me surprises me.”YI105 claimed that she was used to a certain “politically correct” way of discussing diversity andwhen people diverged from the norm she was surprised. When YI105 first spoke about diversity, Page 12.558.10she used the acronym PC for politically correct. She also spoke about trying to frame diversity inthe “correct” way, so that people can understand. Several other participants talked about
institutions, designing courses, teaching techniques, solving instructional problems, andanalyze case studies of ethical issues in academic life. Some doctoral students in the PFFprogram choose to complete the Graduate Certificate in College and University FacultyPreparation6, in which they take several courses geared at preparing them for teaching andfaculty careers and which includes a mentored teaching experience.Format of Support Activities: The format of the support activities ranged from individualconsultations with faculty developers to 1-2 year long teaching certificate programs for graduatestudents involving multiple seminar classes and a mentored teaching experience. Less clear fromthe websites was the level to which faculty and graduate
). Remarks by the President at the Announcement of the "Change the Equation"Initiative. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2010/09/16/remarks-president-announcement-change-equation-initiative[8] Glanville, P., & Carl, M. (n.d.). Engineers in politics. Retrieved from https://www.asme.org/career-education/early-career-engineers/me-today/me-today-march-2013-issue/engineers-in-politics[9] Capaldi, Franco. Teaching Mastery in Statics Using the STEMSI Online Learning Environment. ASEE 2013 Fall Page 24.620.21Mid-Atlantic Regional Conference (2013) Washington D.C.
90% of my students (N=87) strongly agreedthat sharing my teaching philosophy is critical. Additionally, underrepresented students wereempowered and archived more than half the “A”s in my courses. In conclusion, since equal is notalways fair, instructors must make their expectations exceptionally clear to ensure that anystudent can succeed and earn an “A.” I believe it is time for educators to polish their teachingphilosophy, create appealing visual models, and share them with their students.IntroductionDeveloping a Teaching Philosophy Statement (TPS) is central in any academic career [1]. TPSdeclares the educator’s approach to teaching and learning. Creating a teaching philosophyengages educators in metacognitive reflection on what they
required before the assessment is done.Despite the lack of a formal assessment mechanism, faculty would be well advised to explain tothe students what is expected of them, and what scale they will be evaluated on. An independentstudy can be one of the most rewarding parts of a student’s career, but if expectations are notcommunicated carefully, students tend to drift, being driven by other demands on their time, andaccomplish little. Hoskin and Welch2 give sample documents and timetables that can be used totrack student progress.4. Making effective use of independent studiesAs a faculty member, you can wait for students to come to you and suggest projects you areinterested in. Indeed, some independent-study course descriptions seem to assume that
driven engineering issues. Team teaching in this context obviously did notinvolve widely different areas of expertise or disciplines. Neither did it generally involve a Page 12.1092.6blanket separation of teaching duties, e.g. one teaches programming and the other teaches design.This approach might have been less resource intensive, however the authors opted to co-teachmost topics. With minimal formal training in team-teaching, but with a wealth of collaborativeexperience gained over the course of their respective careers, the two faculty membersapproached the design and delivery of the course from the standpoint of ‘what will work best forthese
Page 13.839.4verbiage: “Specify approximate percentage of time/value faculty are expected to devote toteaching, scholarship, Cal Poly service, and community & professional service activities. Forexample, the university might stipulate that untenured faculty devote approximately 60-70% toteaching, 20-30% to scholarship, 5-10% to service, and tenured faculty devote more time toservice and less to teaching. Although faculty might choose different emphases at different timesin their careers, it is not recommended for faculty members to "specialize" in just one area (e.g.,teaching, research, service).” Such specification can eliminate anxiety and focus the efforts oftenure-stream faculty – the only question to be resolved – What is expected in
2006-1066: INCREASING THE CLASS PARTICIPATION EXPERIENCE FORENGINEERSKenneth McDonald, U.S. Military Academy Kenneth McDonald is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering at the US Military Academy. He has served in numerous assignments throughout his military career to include the U.S., Iraq, Germany, Kosovo, and Korea. He is a registered Professional Engineer in the states of Virginia and Wyoming and has a PhD in geological engineering, master’s degrees in geomorphology, city/regional planning and environmental engineering and a bachelor's degree in civil engineering
professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at George Mason University. She earned a BS in Electrical Engineering and a BA in Economics from Rice Uni- versity in 1998. She attended the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign for graduate study, earning an MS and PhD in Electrical Engineering in 2001 and 2005, respectively. Dr. Nelson’s research focus is in statistical signal processing, specifically detection and estimation for applications in target tracking and physical layer communications. Her work on target detection and tracking is funded by the Office of Naval Research. Dr. Nelson is a 2010 recipient of the NSF CAREER Award. She is a member of Phi Beta Kappa, Tau Beta Pi, Eta Kappa Nu
job or inacademic research.Most other kinds of assessment place the student in a passive role. The student simplyreceives feedback from the instructor or TA. Self-assessment, by contrast, forcesstudents to become autonomous learners, to think about how what they should belearning. Having learned self-assessment skills, students can continue to apply them intheir career and in other contexts throughout life.Self-assessment is a useful life skill. In school, students are told what they need to learn,but in the work world, they usually need to figure it out for themselves. Most students donot come into higher education with this skill well developed. But if they are to emergeas graduates who can take responsibility for their own learning, they
level of engagement with the content outside of class.References1. Landis, R. B. Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career. Discovery Press, 2013.2. Chegg.Com. https://prod.cheggstudy.prod2.cheggnet.com/study. Accessed Nov. 13, 2018.3. McCabe, D.L., It Takes a Village Academic Dishonesty. Liberal Education – Washington D.C. 91(3):26-31, 2005.4. Simkin, M. G., Should you allow your Students to Grade their own Homework? Journal of Information Systems Education, Vol.26(2), 2015.5. Simkin, M., Stiver, D., Self-graded homework: Some empirical tests of efficacy. Journal of Education for Business, 2106.6. Wood, T.W., Batouli, M., Michalaka, D., Brown, K., Book, E. K., Perspectives on an Innovative Homework Policy. American
science, it’s also communication, application, management, etc. It’s using what I know to impact others, for this project I was able to impact teachers and children alike.’ ‘One big impact this experience could make on my professional career is to encourage myself and the engineers I work with to do outreach with the community… We do have the opportunity to learn the latest scientific breakthroughs and read frequently through primary literature. It is our responsibility to share the developments we learn with the public. Keeping others informed is vital for social, economic, and political spheres.’Integrating cross-disciplinary activities into undergraduate courses takes considerable time
studentrelated issues.4 Variawa et. al. studies a program Prospective Professors In Training (PPIT) overa period of six years explaining student development and improvements.5 Bedekar et. al. formulated a pilot program to mentor a postdoctoral associate and a Ph.D.student on modern teaching techniques, pedagogical techniques, student engagement andconnection of dots between classroom and real world.6 Bilen-Green et. al. presented their studyon involvement of mentors for three years of early faculty career in order to help them throughformal as well as informal meetings.7 Meredith helps the instructor understand to prepare a fair,and balanced test of correct length. Authors also identify the program and ABET outcomes suchas students’ increased
international experiencesthroughout their career. For these reasons, awareness of diversity issues, biases, and generalcross-cultural competence are critical professional skills that are not explicitly addressed in mostengineering curricula. Opportunities to authentically expose our students to experiences thatbuild awareness and cross-cultural competence is limited by the diversity (or lack thereof) of ourown classrooms and campuses. Students in classrooms that happen to be less diverse may thusexperience an unintentional impediment to professional development as they prepare for “thereal world.”Technical and professional communication (TPC) is one essential professional skill that is, inmany ways, intertwined with diversity. Organizational demography
feedback given orally during thewalkthrough was sufficient for the instructor and student to agree on the assessment ofcompetency for more than 90% of students completing the walkthrough. This reduction ingrading time and improved feedback was tremendous.summary and conclusions While quantitative data were not collected, the faculty for all three courses found that thenew grading schemes decreased their time spent on grading and provided a more authenticassessment of student performance. Both students and faculty viewed these grading approachesas more representative of the way they will be evaluated in their future careers. Thespecifications grading approach also allowed students to better keep track of their currentstanding in the course
asked tobe involved with assessment of overall program quality, both for institutional accountability andfor accreditation. Thus, it is important for freshman faculty to be familiar with a variety ofassessment techniques as they begin their careers in higher education.Student self-assessment is a technique that can be used together with other techniques tocomprise an assessment effort. Student self-assessment refers to a student rating his/her ownachievement of skills or knowledge. If new engineering educators encounter this technique aspart of a program assessment approach, or if they wish to use it to help evaluate students or theirclass effectiveness, then an understanding of what it is, how it is developed, and why it is usefulis
! I decidedthat if I could not come up with a major professional accomplishment from that year, thenperhaps it was time for a change. By the end of the subsequent year, I had left my job in industryfor a full-time teaching position.The lesson. It takes courage (and sometimes a little bloodshed) to acquire a new skill like story-telling. Also, sometimes it is life’s little events that have significant personal meaning and leadto significant life decisions (like career changes). Page 12.307.3Basics from Big Fish I “Story-telling is first for the benefit of the audience, and only a distant second, for
standardsbetter prepare graduates to work for this company?17. If such a course was offered and required for students would this potentially reduce theamount of on-site employee training?18. Would this company be willing to work with local educational institutions to establish acurriculum in which more focus is placed on implementing education aboutstandardization?19. What types of standards would this company like to see applied within the curriculumto better prepare students for a career with this company or similar companies?20. What type and approximately how much funding would be available to assist?21. If a multinational competition were held for students to demonstrate their knowledgeabout standardization, would this company be willing to help
include thin film deposition, interconnect technology, semiconductor manufacturing technology and radiation hardened nanoelectronics. Dr. Ryan joined JSNN after working at the College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering (CNSE) of the University at Albany as Associate Vice President of Technology and Professor of Nanoscience from 2005 to 2008. At CNSE, he managed the cleanrooms and numerous consortia involving CNSE and its industrial partners such as IBM, TEL, AMAT, ASML and others. Dr. Ryan joined CNSE after a 25 year career with IBM. From 2003 to 2005, he was a Distinguished Engineer and Director of Advanced Materials and Process Technology Development and served as the site executive for IBM at Albany Nanotech