course outcomes have been linked to not only Programoutcomes but also ABET outcomes will be reviewed. While discussing the selection of an appropriate evaluationmethod, I will also discuss some of the topics that do NOT lend themselves to timed tests. Suggestions onalternative methods of evaluation for those topics will be offered.This paper will focus on how to prepare good True/False and Multiple Choice questions to test knowledge andskill. It will also present a simplified version of the method psychometricians use to evaluate the quality of thesetypes of exam questions for both difficulty and discrimination. Since many engineering and technology questionsinvolve calculations, a test evaluation method that works for me will be discussed. This
positive teaching experience for the new teacher, and better learning environment andeducation for the students.IntroductionMany new as well as experienced teachers of engineering, science, and technology in collegesand universities often struggle with the teaching component of their jobs. This can be veryfrustrating as these individuals see themselves as highly-intelligent, well-accomplished peoplewho understand the material that they are attempting to teach to students—often undergraduatestudents. When the teaching struggles result in (a) poor teaching evaluations by the students or(b) a significant reduction of time spent developing his or her research program, the teachingproblems can reduce the chances of the faculty member gaining tenure. So
Paper ID #9834Scaffolded Structuring of Undergraduate Research ProjectsDr. Dirk Colbry, Michigan State UniversityDr. Katy Luchini-Colbry, Michigan State University Katy Luchini-Colbry is the Director for Graduate Recruiting at the College of Engineering at Michigan State University, where she completed degrees in political theory and computer science. A recipient of a NSF Graduate Research Fellowship, she earned Ph.D. and M.S.E. in computer science and engineering from the University of Michigan. She has published nearly two dozen peer-reviewed works related to her interests in educational technology and enhancing
National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) administered through Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE). American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 A Survey-Based Study of Students’ Perspective on Different Remote Teaching Styles During COVID-19AbstractAfter the outbreak of the coronavirus in early 2020, most educational institutions worldwide hadto rapidly switch to online learning as a precautionary measure. The sudden change in the teachingstyle had left both the instructors and the students with a lot to do in just a short period of time.Many challenges and obstacles in the new learning environment hindered the
Paper ID #31697Writing Good Reflection Questions: Testing Brookfield’s criticalincident questionnaires effectiveness in improving student learningDr. Elizabeth Payne Tofte, South Dakota State University Education: PhD, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. I am currently an Assistant Professor of Landscape Architecture for the School of Design at South Dakota State University, specializing in Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in interdisciplinary learning environments.Dr. Albena Yuliyanova Yordanova, South Dakota State University Education: University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa; Doctor of Technology with emphasis in
homework seems toincorporate that principle in a manner agreeable to both students and faculty.References 1. A.W. Chickering and Z.F. Gamson, “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education,” American Ass. For Higher Education Bulletin, 29 (1987), 3-7. 2. E. F. Redish, J. M. Saul, and R. N. Steinberg, "On the effectiveness of active-engagement microcomputer- based laboratories”, American Journal Physics, 65 (1997), 45-54. 3. McGraw Hill Homework Manager home page. 4. Wiley Higher Education home page (link to Technology Solutions and Wiley Plus). 5. A. Bright, R. Wang, E102 Advanced Systems Engineering syllabus home page. Harvey Mudd College. 6. S. Servetto, ECE 562, Fundamental
AC 2008-2427: EFFECTIVE TEACHING: THE STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVEAdrian Ieta, Murray State University Adrian Ieta holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering (2004) from The University of Western Ontario, Canada. He also holds a B.Sc. in Physics from the University of Timisoara, Romania (1984), a B.E.Sc. in Electrical Engineering from the Polytechnical University of Timisoara (1992), and an M.E.Sc. from The University of Western Ontario (1999). He worked on industrial projects within the Applied Electrostatics Research Centre and the Digital Electronics Research Group at the University of Western Ontario and is an IEEE member and a registered Professional Engineer of Ontario. He taught at the
well as engineering education, with an emphasis on student learning and educational methods.Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Michelle Wilson (M’89) was born in Chicago, IL, in 1966. She received the B.S. degree in mechanical engineering from Stanford University,Stanford, CA, in 1988 and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, in 1989 and 1995, respectively. She is currently an Associate Professor with the Electrical Engineering Department, University of Washington, Seattle, and she was previously with the University of Kentucky, Lexington, in a similar position from 1996 to 1999. She was also with Applied
Disaster Management Solutions, where he primarily worked as a consultant with Fortune 100 aerospace and pharmaceutical clients. Plumblee’s research interests focus on building a more resilient society, as well as innovation in resource constrained settings (primarily humanitarian technology and delivery). Plumblee founded an international award winning organization (Clemson Engineers for Developing Countries), which has successfully com- pleted over $2 million of infrastructure improvements in rural Haiti. He continues his research to drive innovation of experiential learning within engineering education. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Student and Faculty
,”Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(1):26–36, 1981.3. M. Prince. Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education Washington, Page 26.861.893:223–232, 2004.4. J. Michael. Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances in Physiology Education, 30(4): 159–167,2006.5. Woods, D.R. 1994. Problem-based learning: How to gain the most from PBL. Waterdown, Ontario: Donald R.Woods.6. GM Mason, TR Shuman, and KE Cook. 2013, “Inverted (Flipping) Classrooms – Advantages and Challenges,” inProceedings of the 2013 ASEE Annual Conference, Atlanta, GA, June 2013
UniversityDr. N.M. A. Hossain, Eastern Washington University Dr. Hossain is working as a Professor in the Department of Engineering and Design at Eastern Washington University, Cheney, WA. His research interests involve the computational and experimental analysis of lightweight space structures and composite materials. Dr. Hossain received M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Materials Engineering and Science from South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, South Dakota. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018Investigating Students Performance for Textbook and in House Homework AssignmentsABSTRACTHomework assignments have always been an integral part of learning in all majors and
to studentsLarge classes can improve the student experience in at least four ways.1 The ASEE Engineering Technology listserv, ETD-L@listproc.tamu.edu; SIGCSE-members@listserv.acm.org, forComputer Science educators; and discussion@podnetwork.org, from the Professional and OrganizationalDevelopment NetworkThe first is community. A large class can grow into a supportive learning community. Studentshave more opportunity to partner with, and learn from, other students. Questions are answeredmore quickly on Piazza or a message board. Students can learn from their peers. Clicker-stylepolling provides immediate feedback, regardless of class size. It can even work better in a largeclass, since there is bound to be a critical mass of students who have
the VTADVANCE Program and a doctoral student in the Science Technology Studies program at Virginia Tech. Page 13.287.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Changes in the Nature of Faculty Work in Engineering during the First Three YearsAbstractThe literature frames the socialization process of new faculty members as if they face anidentical set of challenges in each of their pre-tenure years, regardless of discipline. This researchuses a longitudinal research design and interview data to determine if there are differences byyear in the experiences of a cohort pre-tenure faculty in engineering at a research
local industry. The outreach program will constitute animportant part of the author’s promotion and tenure package, and is valued by heradministration.References1. National Science Board. 2012. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington VA: NationalScience Foundation (NSB 12-01).2. B.L. Yoder. ASEE Engineering by the Numbers. 2012. Retrieved from http://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/11-47.pdf3. A.L. Genau, AC 2012-3440: Materials Camp at UAB: Launching Technology to New Heights, ASEEAnnual Conference Proceedings.4. G.L. Winn, AC 2012-3435: Re-assessing the Effects of Summer Camp on STEM Enrollments Using anInnovative Survey Technique, ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings
that define successfuland unsuccessful homework might be uniquely, understood by looking at students’ experiencewith homework in general in the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics)fields, then taking that understanding and adapting it to a single course. We were also interestedin obtaining a broader understanding of how students felt about their experience with STEMhomework assignments at the university level. Getting a comprehensive understanding of students’perspectives about STEM homework could provide insight into how all members of the STEMcommunity could work to make the experience better, which could lead to deeper learning,stronger connections, and increased excitement in students about their STEM
begin to question power dynamics in enabling anddesigning active learning situations within engineering education to shift power to the students.Future workOur experiences with visual notetaking left us with questions for future work as we moveforward in our roles as educators, designers, researchers, and learners. We are left wonderinghow technology might support or hinder the future of visual notetaking. With rising concernsabout sustainability and the clutter involved in taking physical notes, future work could explorequestions around digital visual notetaking (with different digital creation and organization tools).We are also left wondering about the application of visual notetaking in different classroomsoutside of engineering. What might
University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and mathematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for assessment and professional development, implementa- tion of computational tools across the chemical engineering curriculum, and game-based learning.Dr. Allen A. Jayne P.E., University of Delaware Allen Jayne is an assistant professor in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at the University of Delaware. He possesses 28 years of
eye of skepticism. There are many articles in the Journal of Engineering Educationreferencing research projects attempting to answer whether active learning techniques areeffective. The magic is not in the use of the technique but rather all learning is made possible bythe learner making sense of the content for themselves. The techniques, if successfullyemploying the theories and research from the sciences of learning and teaching, are just tools tohelp facilitate greater student learning. The traditional manner by which we teach with lectureand individualized homework sets is largely a cultural artifact of when behaviorism was theleading philosophy explaining how people learn. Today, the boom in technology has caused aboom in research where
Dakota, Michigan Technological University, and Mississippi State University. In addition to his responsibilities as Interim Vice President, he is a tenured Professor of Chemical Engineering, and is the holder of the Earnest W. and Mary Ann Deavenport, Jr. Endowed Chair, held by the Dean of Engineering at MSU. Dr. Schulz has been an active participant in chemical engineering education, and was selected as a Fellow for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2007 in recognition for contributions made to chemical engineering. He has held a variety of offices within the American Society for Engineering Education in both the New Engineering Educators and Chemical
2006-710: A MODEL FOR PREPARING THE NSF CAREER PROPOSALGarrick Louis, University of Virginia Garrick E. Louis is an Associate Professor of Systems & Information Engineering at the University of Virginia. He also holds a courtesy appointment in Civil and Environmental Engineering. His research interests include engineering for developing communities and sustainable infrastructure, particularly the development of policies and programs to assure sustained access to infrastructure-related services in the face of routine, and low-probability high-consequence interruptions from natural and deliberate man-made sources. Garrick’s projects include community-based water, sanitation and
Paper ID #19408Helping Students to Provide Effective Peer FeedbackDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Helping Students to Provide Effective
Paper ID #21561A Study on the Student Success in a Blended-Model Engineering ClassroomDr. Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University Dr. Vimal Viswanathan is an assistant professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at San Jose State University. His research interests include design innovation, creativity, design theory and engineer- ing education.Dr. John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University John T Solomon is an assistant professor in the mechanical engineering department of Tuskegee Univer- sity. He received PhD in Mechanical Engineering from Florida State University, USA in 2010. Prior join- ing Tuskegee
mjeliot@u.washington.edu.Jennifer Turns, University of Washington Jennifer Turns is an assistant professor in the Department of Technical Communication at the University of Washington. She holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology. Her interests include engineering education, learner-centered design, user-centered design, and audience analysis. Dr. Turns is currently working on multiple NSF grants dealing with engineering education including an NSF Career award exploring the impact of portfolio construction on engineering students’ professional identity.Emma Rose, University of Washington Emma J. Rose is a doctoral student in the UW Dept of
AC 2012-3109: ADJUSTING STUDENT TEST PREPARATION THROUGHTHEIR OWN SELF-ASSESSMENTMajor Brian M. Wade, U.S. Military Academy Brian Wade graduated from the U.S.Military Academy (USMA) with a bachelor’s of science in mechan- ical engineering in 2001. He earned a master’s of science degree in aeronautical engineering from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 2009. He is a rated Army aviator and has served in various com- mand and staff positions during his Army career. During his tenure at USMA, he has course directed the introductory thermodynamic and fluid dynamics course.Lt. Col. Robert J. Rabb, U.S. Military AcademyMajor R. Clayton McVay, U.S. Military AcademyDr. Peter Hanlon, U.S. Military Academy
Paper ID #9816Optimizing your teaching loadDr. Edward F. Gehringer, North Carolina State University Dr. Gehringer is an associate professor in the Departments of Computer Science, and Electrical & Computer Engineering. His research interests include computerized assessment systems, and the use of natural-language processing to improve the quality of reviewing. He teaches courses in the area of programming, computer architecture, object-oriented design, and ethics in computing. Page 24.961.1
potential roles of socioeconomic status, ethnicity, gender, and other political identifiers in determining undergraduate engagement across a variety of majors, including engineering.Dr. Denise Wilson, University of Washington Denise Wilson is a professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Washington, Seattle. Her research interests in engineering education focus on the role of self-efficacy, belonging, and other non-cognitive aspects of the student experience on engagement, success, and persistence and on effective methods for teaching global issues such as those pertaining to sustainability. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019
the Virginia Military Institute. He received a B.S. in Mechanical Engineering from the United States Military Academy at West Point, NY. He completed his Ph.D. work at MIT in the areas of computational modeling and multiphase flows. He has over 10 years industrial experience in the modeling of environmental technologies and manufacturing processes. His current interests include numerical analysis, virtual reality modeling for industrial processes, monte carlo methods in numerical radiation modeling, computational modeling of viscoelastic materials, and biological thermofluids. At VMI he teaches energy conversion, computational modeling and virtual design, biothermal fluid mechanics
AC 2008-1483: DAMAGE CONTROL: WHAT TO DO WHEN THINGS DON'TWORKEdward Gehringer, North Carolina State University Page 13.349.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Damage Control: What to Do When Things Don’t Work Edward F. Gehringer North Carolina State University efg@ncsu.eduAbstractWhat should you do when your software breaks, when your labs don't work out, when your testsare bombed, when your homework has errors? These are questions every instructor has faced.This paper brings together a set of tips from dozens of experienced
Paper ID #30569Closing the Homework Feedback Loop using Dual-Submission-with-ReflectionHomework MethodologyDr. Timothy Aaron Wood, The Citadel Timothy A Wood is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at The Citadel. He acquired a Bachelor’s in Engineering Physics Summa Cum Laude with Honors followed by Civil Engi- neering Master’s and Doctoral degrees from Texas Tech University. His technical research focuses on the intersection of soil-structure interaction and structural/geotechnical data. He encourages students pushing them toward self-directed learning through reading, and inspiring
Paper ID #12171Formative Classroom Observations for New FacultyDr. Laura D Hahn, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Laura Hahn is Director of the Academy for Excellence in Engineering Education at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign. She is also an adjunct assistant professor in the Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. She specializes in instructional development and intercultural communica- tion.Chris Migotsky, University of Illinois Chris Migotsky is the Coordinator of Faculty Teaching Programs within the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois. He also has