Conference Session

Best Methods for NEEs

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

James C. Squire, Virginia Military Institute; Turk McCleskey, Virginia Military Institute; Elizabeth White Baker, Wake Forest University; Anthony Evan English, Western New England University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Technical Analysis: Matching Time-Displaced Generalized Patterns,” Eastern Finance Association 2001 Annual Meeting, Savannah, April 13-16, 2011.36 Maguire, S. Writing Solid Code, Microsoft Programming Series, Washington, 1993.37 Hara N., Solomon P., Kim S.L., and Sonnenwald D. “An Emerging View of Scientific Collaboration: Scientists' Perspectives on Collaboration and Factors that Impact Collaboration,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 54(10), pp. 952–965, 2003.38 Boice, R. Advice for New Faculty Members: Nihil Nimus, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, p. 184, 2000.39 ibid, p. 188-189.40 ibid, p. 183-186.41 Boyer E. Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, The

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine; William R. Marshall, Alief Independent School District

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

; Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.9. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.10. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American Society for EngineeringEducators, June, 2007.11. National Joint Apprenticeship Training Commission (2008), Course 42, International Brotherhood ofElectrical Workers.12. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”.Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.13. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as Good A Teacher as You Think

Conference Session

Best of the NEE

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Brian M. Wade, U.S. Military Academy; Robert J. Rabb, U.S. Military Academy; R. Clayton McVay, U.S. Military Academy; Peter Hanlon, U.S. Military Academy

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. “Test Preparation and Performance: A Self-Regulatory Analysis,” The Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 70, no. 2 Winter, 2002, 101-113.6. Caudron, S., "Can Generation Xers be Trained?" Training and Development, v.3, 1997, 20-24. Page 25.134.147. Hines, W. W., et. al. Probability and Statistics in Engineering, 4th Ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2003.

Conference Session

Lessons for New Engineering Educators

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9,No 7, 1997 – 1998.7. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.8. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.9. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American Society for EngineeringEducators, June, 2007.10. National Joint Apprenticeship Training Commission (2008), Course 42, International Brotherhood ofElectrical Workers

Conference Session

Mentoring and Development of New Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Andrea Surovek, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Jennifer Karlin, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology; Cassandra Groen, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.4. Brent, R., Felder, R. M., (2000). Helping Faculty Get Off to a Good Start. American Society for Engineering Education 2000 Annual Conference.5. Brent, R., Felder, R. M., Rajala, S. A., Gilligan, J. G., Lee, G., (2001). New Faculty 101: An Orientation to the Profession. 31st ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference.6. Brent, R., Felder, R., Regan, T., Walser, A., Carlson-Dakes, C., Evans, D., Malave, C., Sanders, K., McGourty, J., (2000). Engineering Faculty Development: A Multicoalition Perspective. 2000 ASEE Annual Conference.7. Chesler, N. C., Chesler, M. A., (2002). Gender-Informed Mentoring Strategies for Women Engineering

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade

Collection

2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine; Carl Nelson Blue, University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.8. Marshall, J. and Marshall, J. (2007). In Search of Teaching Excellence. American Society for EngineeringEducators, June, 2007.9. National Joint Apprenticeship Training Commission (2008), Course 42, International Brotherhood of ElectricalWorkers.10. Michaelsen, L., (1998). Three Keys to Using Learning Groups Effectively. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”.Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No 5, 1998.11. Price, P.C., (2006). Are You as Good A Teacher as You Think? Thought & Action, Vol. 14, Fall 2006.12. Gibbs, G., (2001). Changing Student Learning Behavior Outside of Class

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

John Marshall, University of Southern Maine

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

. Page 23.960.103. Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences, New York, Basic Books.4. Spense, L. (2000). Maybe Teaching is a Bad Idea. On line: www.teachingexcellence.org downloaded October 12,2000.5. Dutch, B.J., and Allen, D.E., and White, H.B. (1998). Problem-based Learning: Preparing Students to Succeed inthe 21st Century. “Essays on Teaching Excellence”. Center for Teaching, University of Southern Maine. Vol. 9, No7, 1997 – 1998.6. Bound, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The Challenge of Problem-Based Learning (p. 13). New York: St. Martin’sPress.7. Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-Based Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes andImplementation Issues. Academic Medicine, 68. 52-81.8

Conference Session

Best of the NEE

Collection

2008 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Edward Gehringer, North Carolina State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Page 13.349.921 This author has requested anonymity.Proceedings of the 2008 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition 8Copyright  2008, American Society for Engineering Education students are pretty much done at the end of class time. It also forces me to really focus on what I 22 want to test them over without asking redundant questions.If you solve an exam ahead of time, you can also pass out solutions to students as theyleave. Wayne Wells23 tells of one instructor who did this: [A]s each student completed the work and turned it in, she handed them a copy of the solutions with the rule

Conference Session

Assessment of Student Learning – New Engineering Educators Division

Collection

2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, Purdue University, West Lafayette (College of Engineering); Hossein EbrahimNejad, Purdue University-Main Campus, West Lafayette (College of Engineering)

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

: Alverno College Institute, 2015.[3] S. L. Post, “Standards-based grading in a fluid mechanics course” in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[4] M. W. Roberts, A. M. Jones, and M. K. Thompson, “Work in progress: using outcomes- based assessment in an introductory structural engineering course” in 121st ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Indianapolis, IN, USA, June 15-18, 2014.[5] M. T. Siniawski, A. R. Carberry, and J. D. Dionisio, “Standards-based grading: An alternative to score-based assessment” in 2012 PSW ASEE Conference, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA, April 19-21, 2012.[6] H. A. Diefes-Dux, “Student reflections on standards-based graded” in 46th

Conference Session

NEE 2 - Strategies to Improve Teaching Effectiveness

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Taryn Shalini Bipat, University of Washington; Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Mitchell Fajardo; Yuliana Flores, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

(pp. 3-17). Springer, Dordrecht. 13Hill, H. C., Beisiegel, M., & Jacob, R. (2013). Professional development research: Consensus, crossroads, and challenges. Educational researcher, 42(9), 476-487.Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and teaching, 23(4), 387-405.Kreber, C., Klampfleitner, M., McCune, V., Bayne, S., & Knottenbelt, M. (2007). What do you mean by “authentic”? A comparative review of the literature on conceptions of authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 58(1), 22-43.Sepp, L. A., Orand, M., Turns, J. A

Conference Session

Leadership Development in Change: A Panel to Explore Experiences, Skills, and Learning in Change Management for New Engineering Educators

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Ella Lee Ingram, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

-startup-skills-you-won-t-learn-in-school.html[10] Ingram, E.L., R.A. House, S. Chenoweth, et al. 2014. From faculty to change agent: Lessons learned in the de-velopment and implementation of a change workshop. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Confer-ence, Indianapolis, IN.[11] Eckel, P.D. & M. Hartley. 2008. Developing academic strategic alliances: Reconciling multiple institutionalcultures, policies, and practices. The Journal of Higher Education 79(6): 613-637.[12] Eckel, P.D., M. Green, B. Hill, & W. Mallon. 1999. On change III. Taking charge of change: A primer for col-leges and universities. American Council on Education, Washington, DC.[13] Tierney, W.G. 1988. Organizational culture in higher education: Defining the

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 1

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Juan C Morales, Universidad del Turabo; Michael J. Prince, Bucknell University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

ImmersionProgram. Proceedings of the 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, IN, June 2014. Page 26.1584.16[12] Brown, S. and Poor, C. Ranking Tasks for Mechanics of Materials. Prentice Hall. 2011.[13] Diez, D.M., Barr, C.D., and Cetinkaya-Rundel, M. OpenIntro Statistics. Available online for free and releasedby Open-Intro under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike.URL: https://www.openintro.org/stat/textbook.php?stat_book=os. Retrieved January 28, 2015,.[14] Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L, and Cocking, R.R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School:Expanded Edition. National Academies Press. Available online for

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators Division Technical Session 2

Collection

2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Monika Rummler, Technische Universität Berlin; Petra Nikol, Technische Universität Berlin

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

available.team for examinations, colleagues within the project.The following table describes a model curriculum draft for the qualification of a changeagent´s profile. It is derived from the draft of the recent exemplary curriculum we haveoffered to the first group of change agents. It has been developed in cooperation with theparticipants’ demands and curricular needs and the trainers’ teaching purposes.Table 2. Model curriculum for (teaching) change agentsTime Continuing education Tailor-made offers Support program coaching, peer observation of teaching

Conference Session

Listening and Negotiation

Collection

2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Janet Callahan, Boise State University; Mary E. Besterfield-Sacre, University of Pittsburgh; Jenna P. Carpenter, Campbell University; Kim LaScola Needy P.E., University of Arkansas; Cheryl B. Schrader, Missouri University of Science and Technology

Tagged Topics

ASEE Diversity Committee, Diversity

Tagged Divisions

Continuing Professional Development, Engineering Leadership Development Division, New Engineering Educators, Student, Women in Engineering

,and employing good listening skills, faculty can effectively navigate a variety of career situationsto arrive at a mutually beneficial end.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to acknowledge the review committee for the Women in EngineeringDivision, which encouraged them to formalize the panel discussion into a paper focused onacademic negotiation.References 1. Fisher, R., Ury, W. and Patton, B. (2012). Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Third Ed., London: Random House 2. Harvard Business Essentials: Negotiation, 2003. 3. Kolb, D.M., Williams, J. (2003) Everyday Negotiation, Navigating the Hidden Agendas in Bargaining, Jossey-Bass. 4. Babcock, L., and Laschever, S., (2003). Women Don’t Ask

Conference Session

NEE - 3: Improving Homework and Problem-solving Performance

Collection

2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Alicia Baumann, Arizona State University; Stephanie M. Gillespie, Arizona State University; Nicolle Sanchez, Arizona State University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

becurious about techniques for connecting with students and creating new value, studies need to bedone to evaluate if UGTAs recognize if they gain the skill of entrepreneurially minded thinkingin a professional setting.7. References[1] Kern Engineering Entrepreneurial Network (KEEN), “The Handbook for EML,” KEEN’zine Engineering Unleashed, vol. 5. [Online]. Available: http://online.fliphtml5.com/zyet/ykie/#p=1. [Accessed Jan. 28, 2019].[2] S. J. Krause, J. A. Middleton, E. Judson, K. R. Beeley, and Y. Chen, “Factors Impacting Retention and Success of Undergraduate Engineering Students,” in Proceedings of the 122nd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA, June 14-17, 2015.[3] J. Crowe, R. Ceresola, and T. Silva

Conference Session

Women, Minorities and the New Engineering Educator

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cheryl Allendoerfer, University of Washington; Sharon Jones, Lafayette College; Jaime Hernandez, Texas State University-San Marcos; Rebecca Bates, Minnesota State University-Mankato; Robin Adams, Purdue University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, DC: The National Academies Press. [3] Banks, J. (1982). Teaching for social justice, diversity, and citizenship in a global world. Education Forum,vol. 68(4), pp. 296-305. [4] Grant, C. and Sleeter, C. (1986). Race, class and gender in education research: An argument for integrativeanalysis. Review of Educational Research, vol. 56(2), pp. 195-211. [5] Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American EducationalResearch Journal, vol. 32(3), pp. 464-491. [6] Malveaux, J. (2005). Dimensions of diversity. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, vol. 22(19), pp. 31. [7] Jones, S., Bhandari, A., Clapp, L., Fennell, D., LaPara, T . and Tull, K. (2006). Diversity in environmentalengineering: The good and bad

Conference Session

Off the Beaten Path

Collection

2012 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Cynthia C. Fry, Baylor University; Kenneth W. Van Treuren, Baylor University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

semester were:ECS Core Competencies in Teaching, Academic Integrity Update, and Innovation andCreativity in the Classroom.Seminar 1 – ECS Core Competencies in TeachingThe overall seminar series had four primary objectives: to intentionally refocus on one ofthe ECS’s Core Competencies, excellence in undergraduate teaching; to foster cross-disciplinary discussions within the School of ECS; and to promote the development of “bestpractices” in teaching. This first seminar was aimed at getting the faculty to identify whatcore competencies in teaching should be important for the School of ECS. Teachingexcellence is consistent with Baylor University 's Christian commitment, to do “…whateveryou do, you must do all for the glory of God.” (I Cor 10:31) or

Conference Session

Been There, Done That: Advice for New Faculty

Collection

2010 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Robert Garrick, Rochester Institute of Technology; Scott Anson, Rochester Institute of Technology; Mario Castro-Cedeno, Rochester Institute of Technology; Elizabeth Dell, Rochester Institute of Technology; Christopher Greene, University of Alabama; Carol Romanowski, Rochester Institute of Technology; Michael Slifka, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST); Larry Villasmil, Rochester Institute of Technology; James Lee, Rochester Institute of Technology (CAST)

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

, What the best college teachers do. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004.[3] R. Boice, "New faculty as teachers," Journal of Higher Education, vol. 62, pp. 150-173, 1991.[4] R. Boice, Advice for New Faculty Members. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2000.[5] B. G. Davis, Tools for Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1993.[6] P. L. Fox, S. P. Hundley, and H. O. Yurtseven, "Engineering technology faculty salaries: The past, the present, and the future," in 2000 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition: Engineering Education Beyond the Millenium, June 18, 2000 - June 21, 2000, St. Louis, MO, United states, 2000, pp. 2517-2522.[7] T. K. Grose. (January 2007) 21st Century Professor. ASEE Magazine.[8] J. W

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade in Teaching II

Collection

2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

designsituations. With the conversation as a backdrop, students were then introduced to the notion of adesign rationale and asked to draft a sample design rationale as a way to introduce them to thisconcept.Case 2: Graduate multi-week projectThe journal landscape project was a multi-week project in a graduate level course entitledEmpirical Traditions in Human Centered Design and Engineering. Per the syllabus, the task was Page 22.1116.3as follows: “Working in teams of two or three, you and your teammate(s) will characterize oneyear of articles in a major journal in our field in terms of five to seven dimensions of yourchoosing and then prepare a summary of

Conference Session

Faculty Development: Creating successful NEEs

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Abul Azad, Northern Illinois University; Osman Tokhi, University of Sheffield, UK.

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

(s). ItSubmitted to 2007 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (New Engineering Educators Division), June 24-27, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.is a common practice for the faculty in the US, to mention the text book page numbers thathave been covered for a specific class. Course end student evaluation: Course end student evaluation is also a part ofinternal quality assurance measures in the UK. These evaluation outcomes are notconsidered that seriously to assess the teaching quality. However, in the US, in theabsence of any other continuous monitoring mechanisms, student evaluation is a majorfactor towards measuring one’s teaching quality. Sometimes, these evaluations areidentified as one of the reasons for grade

Conference Session

Effective & Efficient Teaching Skills

Collection

2006 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Eric Larson, Seattle University; Agnieszka Miguel, Seattle University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Conference Session

New Engineering Educators: Tricks of the Trade II

Collection

2007 Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Karen Benitez, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Juan Jimenez, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Yesenia Cruz, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Marta Rosa, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez; Alexandra Medina-Borja, University of Puerto Rico-Mayaguez

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

Conference Session

Tricks of the Trade I

Collection

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Authors

Beverly Kristenson Jaeger, Northeastern University; Kerri Liss, Northeastern University; Bea van den Heuvel; Ellen Wilson, Northeastern University

Tagged Divisions

New Engineering Educators

improvement, consideration, considerations for grading representative(s) ~20 min Instructor clarification and the futureMotivation for further explorationBy guiding peers in their own course activities, Quality Managers offer a unique viewpoint in theclassroom; this study explores the QM perspectives as both assistant educators and as students.Quality Managers are the pivotal elements in the success of this peer-educator initiative becausethey provide a bridge between the professor and the general students. A deeper understanding ofthe QM experience from the Quality Manager’s perspective can be a step to ensuring an efficientand successful