, 2025Reflective Teaching Practices for Equity-Minded Engineering InstructorsAbstractReflection is often cited as a critical component of effective teaching, but the term itself and itsrelated practices often remain ambiguous. Reflecting on one's teaching is an important exerciseto better understand the approaches to and success towards creating inclusive classrooms.Therefore, engineering educators must become aware of reflective practices to be able to employthem in their work. We explored essential elements of highly effective reflection practices forequity-minded educators in a workshop where faculty participants learned about three reflectivepractices: (i) personal reflection, (ii) reflective engagement with colleagues, and (iii) reflectionwith
Paper ID #45182Examining Gender Differences in Engineering Students’ Reflections on CombatingSystemic RacismSakhi Aggrawal, Purdue University at West Lafayette (PPI) Sakhi Aggrawal is a Graduate Research Fellow in Computer and Information Technology department at Purdue University. She completed her master’s degree in Business Analytics from Imperial College London and bachelor’s degree in Computer and Information Technology and Organizational Leadership from Purdue University. She worked in industry for several years with her latest jobs being as project manager at Google and Microsoft. Her current research focuses on
unlike critical pedagogy buton an inward twoness generally and use it to transform their realities. specifically committed to experienced by African Comprised elements are reciprocal collective, not merely individual, Americans. and unidirectional elements of empowerment” (Ladson- reflection and action. Billings, 1995, p. 160). 5Critical Consciousness in Higher EducationThe formal education system reinforces white supremacist
education. Her main goal is to understand how work management and product development practices widely used in industry can be modified and adapted to streamline undergraduate STEM education.Vidya Reddy Madana, Purdue University Vidya Madana is an undergraduate student in the Department of Computer Science at Purdue University, concentrating on machine intelligence and software engineering. She is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in May 2027. Vidya’s research interests include artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data visualization. In addition to her academic pursuits, she has experience in STEM education, robotics, and journalism, reflecting her broad interests and diverse skill set
. Notably, a 9% decrease in DFW rates was observed for engineering and science faculty.The faculty program consisted of several hybrid workshops and small-group sessions thatencouraged critical, reflective discussions, development of individual implementation plans, andadministration of a formative feedback survey to undergraduate students three times per semesterto obtain real-time feedback to promote change in the faculty members’ teaching. The facultyand graduate student PD programs were part of a larger institutional initiative to enhance STEMstudent success at the HSI through systemic changes and policies and aimed to improveundergraduate engineering courses with historically high failing and withdrawal rates.Graduate Student PD Program
traditionalengineering curricula, where creative solutions and innovation do not always positively affectacademic performance. Taylor et al. [19] found that while ADHD traits did not predict students’overall GPA, they negatively predicted students’ engineering GPA. Engineering GPA does notreflect creativity, so the strengths students with ADHD have are not reflected in exam scoreseither, further undermining the value ADHDers bring to engineering. The misalignment ofADHD traits and numerical academic assessment in engineering helps illustrate one way thatengineering is less hospitable to ADHDers.Fostering creative problem-solving in engineering curricula remains an important goal.Attracting and retaining neurodiverse engineering students and faculty, including
: CRITICAL THINKING, TIME MANAGEMENT, EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION.Skill-Building Workshops: A CloserLook• Icebreaker: Introductions and goal sharing to build community.• Critical Thinking: Activities on questioning assumptions and evaluating evidence.• Time Management: Strategies for prioritization, goal setting, and scheduling.• Effective Communication: Role-playing exercises for clear messaging and active listening.• Reflection: Sharing takeaways and planning for skill application.Fostering a Sense of Belonging• Sharing experiences and challenges in a supportive environment.• "Cultural Exchange" activity
identity.Dr. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a Professor of STEM education in the School of Teaching and Learning at the University of Florida and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Think-Aloud Insights: Exploring QuantCrit Challenges and Diverse Survey Responses Among Undergraduate Engineering StudentsIntroductionDiversity in engineering contributes to social and economic advancement in communities byoffering varied perspectives on problems, better reflecting changing demographics, andproviding tangible business advantages. Higher education is vital in
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 2216561. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.1 Overview of NCWIT’s Philosophy2NCWIT Undergraduate System ModelOrganizational Change Process Communicating for Change Evidence-based tools help establish credibility by explaining a vision ofchange and how it is grounded in theories, best practices, and resources. Creator: https://pixy.org/ | Credit: https://pixy.org/763757/ Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0Use Compelling Evidence “[I have met] an incredible
Reflection 5 Students present their AI projects and participate in discussions about the ethical implications of their work.The camp was designed to give a diverse group of students a strongfoundation in several topics. The students participated in a workshop onethics and how it can drive decisions and were given resources on how to formdebate positions and how to tell an effective story. The program included acapstone project that was judged by local IT leaders.Day 1 The group was provided an introduction to AI with respected educatorsleaders in the fieldDay 2 The day focused on the creating ethical frameworks. The facilitator leda workshop on ethics and making decisions along ethical lines. The studentsalso learned
) identified a significant lack of JEDI-relatedcontent in professional engineering societies, underscoring the urgent need to strengtheneducation in these areas to prepare inclusive and socially committed engineers. Armanios et al.(2021) highlighted how a curricular restructuring led to an increase from 17% to 69% in theincorporation of social justice concepts in students' final reflections, demonstrating the ability toinclude the social impact of engineering decisions. Similarly, Hess et al. (2024) emphasized theconnections between ethics and DEI, identifying the need to integrate and unify strategies thatenable engineering students to address both the social and technical aspects of their profession.Finally, Gupta, Talluri and Ghosh (2024
streamline undergraduate STEM education.Vidya Reddy Madana, Purdue University Vidya Madana is an undergraduate student in the Department of Computer Science at Purdue University, concentrating on machine intelligence and software engineering. She is expected to graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in May 2027. Vidya’s research interests include artificial intelligence, machine learning, and data visualization. In addition to her academic pursuits, she has experience in STEM education, robotics, and journalism, reflecting her broad interests and diverse skill set. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Gender Differences in Global Identity Development: Implications for
cultures. Individual feedback sessions on theirdepartment’s Gallup Q12 results provided personalized guidance, promoting reflection onleadership practices.IntroductionA National Science Foundation ADVANCE adaptation award was received by a smallengineering, science, and technology university located in the US Midwest to developprogramming for faculty and research scientists to increase awareness of implicit biases andpromote pathways to faculty success. The university consists of thirteen departments, twelve ofwhich are Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). The university’sadministrative structure does not include Deans, just Department Heads that oversee academicdepartments and report directly to the Provost. As of 2024, there
fall 2018. The content ofthis faculty ad shows vision, values, and inclusion. The ad has some elements that one would nottypically see in a faculty ad, including (a) departmental values upfront and visibly clear, (b) asection describing our uniqueness and a vision of the kind of engineering program we arelaunching, (c) a section describing a vision of who we want. The ask for the candidates alsodemonstrate inclusion and an invitation to align with the vision and values of the department.Step 2. Forming the Search Committee(s)The Engineering Chair worked to form an appropriate and diverse search committee for eachposition. This diversity is reflected in disciplinary expertise, gender, rank, race, ethnicity, etc.Incredible intentionality was
(Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). Consisting of five statements that respondents rate based on Recent Events Replaced their level of agreement using a 7-point Likert scale ranging with Satisfaction with Life from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). The statements Scale are general in nature and reflect a person’s overall satisfaction with life. Underrepresented Status Impact of one’s minority status within the STEM discipline. (Revised) Likert Scale from 1 (Almost Always) to 5 (Never). How frequently participants experienced micro-affirmations Perspectives on
Environment)• Scaffolding of instruction supports students who have different starting points in their academic preparation, background, and experience.• Graduate student feedback is collected and utilized to support the program in the assessment, reflection, and evaluation.Body of Knowledge Demographic Data – Subject Matter Experts Type of organization Disciplinary backgroundRole on the NSF IGE grant Job focus Terminal degreeBody of Knowledge Process• Collected and refined learning objectives (LOs) for five graduate chemical engineering courses covering six topics: • Thermodynamics, Kinetics and Reactor Design, Transport
) Which mentor qualities aresuccessful in graduate school guidance? and 3) How can virtual activities engage students tobuild leadership skills and confidence in their academic pathways and future careers? Theprogram structure has three key features to enrich the peer mentorship experience: (i) goal settingand reflections, (ii) academic/professional development, and (iii) community building. Weevaluated the program through a series of surveys and interviews to collect information aboutundergraduates’ knowledge on graduate admissions items, reflections on mentoring interactions,and accomplishments made during the program.We recruited participants through in-person promotion during meetings of student organizations,referrals, and written/electronic
conceptualizingand operationalizing “Servingness,” which encompasses the policies and practices aimed atpositioning institutions to reflect and act in their role to ensure representation and engagement ofthe Latin* community (Garcia, 2020; Garcia et al., 2019; Garcia & Cuellar, 2023; Garcia &Koren, 2020).Perhaps as an unintended side effect of their undergraduate-centered definition, current researchon how policies and practices at HSIs impact Latin* student success predominantly focuses onundergraduate students. As a result, little is known about how servingness impacts theexperiences of engineering graduate students and how institutional policies and practices may beaiding or barricading their path to success. As the calls to expand the post
continues to do the work? Future WorkContinue cluster meetings & expand to involveother members of campusExpand to other local universitiesPartner with local and campus organizationssuch as Zora’s House PROPEL in Action“For the master’s tool will never dismantle the master’s house.” - Audre LordeWhat is Important to You? Take a moment to reflect on your ideal working environment. What elements are essential for you to thrive in an environment that centers women of color? Are these elements present in your current work environment? What do you need?Does your institution currently have an affinity groupor space that supports WoC faculty & staff?What current and developing identities do you
foundations, implementation strategies, and assessment methods used to create anadaptive advising system that supports diverse student pathways while maintaining engineeringrigor. Student insights were powerful in informing not only curricular decisions but alsoacademic and career advising. The strategies herein reflect an intentional commitment to Educatethe Whole Engineer by promoting an academic advising model that would both complement thecurricular experiences and align with the evolving personal and professional aspirations ofstudents towards career readiness. The approaches described offer valuable insights for both newand existing engineering programs seeking to transform their advising practices to better serve anincreasingly diverse student
“special education” classrooms in secondary school due to a lack of teachertraining and resources to integrate students into classrooms, which can significantly hamperpreparations for the academic demands of university STEM programs [9]. Thisunder-representation is not merely a reflection of broader societal challenges but also highlightsspecific barriers that DHH students face in STEM higher education, such as the limitedavailability of accessible learning materials and real-time communication tools [10].The World Health Organization estimates that over 5% of the world’s population—approximately430 million people—experience hearing impairment, with this number expected to rise to over700 million by 2050 [11]. Within this population, DHH students
? Remember that youneed to do this over the course of the year. Build in your plan what’s needed at thebeginning of the year, cover in training, then build the remaining components throughoutthe year.CoNECD Presentation 2025 Acker Coley Johnson Sims Page 10 of 24Research indicates that individuals working in Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) rolesexperience higher levels of burnout. Factors contributing to this include low engagement,limited budgets, and insufficient support from management.FORBESWith impending legislative changes, this trend is likely to intensify.In light of this, let's take a moment to reflect: How are your current self-care practicessupporting you?Remember, self-care is more than a personal
stories. This widget has to be made.’” After a pause, Ms. Villegas added, “Funny students may choose these times to be the most subversive.” (Low, 2024, p. 95) 6This quote is taken from a book by David Low (which I'll talk about on the next slide) thatexamines transgressive humor in classrooms. The quote demonstrates several dimensionsof why understanding, analyzing, and reflecting upon humor in classrooms is important.First, it acknowledges that when students use humor, it represents that they understandthings (i.e. "being two steps ahead") instead of the common notion of being(unintentionally) disruptive.Second, it acknowledges the capitalist
reflect upon and critically engage with these issues.Space Grant has also identified that current relationships with affiliated institutionsand among members are mostly transactional in nature. This presents an opportunityto enhance resource sharing and operate more effectively as a consortium, where allaffiliates view each other as peers. Currently, while each affiliate performs its workexceptionally well, there’s a sense of disconnect—many are unaware of what othersare doing and don’t fully feel part of a larger, unified organization. It's important toemphasize that Space Grant is not just a funding source; it is a partnership. Theprogram uses a competitive subaward structure that allows institutions to choose amission directorate aligned
. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 Development of a measure of intersectional socioeconomic inequality that extends beyond incomeAbstractIn this research paper, we describe our initial development of a more holistic socioeconomicinequality measure, the Model of Intersectional Socioeconomic Inequality. Our development ofthis model is in response to the urgent need for a more comprehensive understanding of inequalitythat goes beyond income disparities. Traditional socioeconomic measures do not reflect therealities of inequality. Particularly, they do not recognize the complex sociological processes thatimpact low-income students and their access to resources necessary to be successful in STEM.Thus, a
activities and programs, he revealed, How do you get engineering students who are already spending way too much time outside of the classroom and the lecture hall studying to give up even more of that little bit of time off. SteveAll three quotes reflected the academic environment that students experience in engineering atthis particular institution and suggest that institutions rarely recognize or address issues likecommunication gaps and the misalignment of students’ expectations around learning methods andgoals.A second aspect has to do with the use and implementation of technology in courses. Twostudents noted how for some departments and students adding technological innovation can bedifficult. On the one hand, a graduate student
recognitioncommensurate with such achievements and contributions [1], [2]. However, this belief is oftenoverly idealized and may not always reflect the complexities of reality, as it fails to fully accountfor the barriers, biases, and inequalities that impact who succeeds and how recognition isdistributed. [3], [4], [5]. For many, in particular women and underrepresented and minoritized(URM) students, the STEM space—the early stages of pursuing an engineering degree or later intheir professional careers—frequently experience overt sexism, gender bias, racism,discrimination, stereotyping, and isolation [4], [6], [7].National concern and acknowledgment of barriers faced by women in STEM is longstanding andwell-documented [1], [3], [8], [9]. According to the
alsoaware of the need to critically reflect on their own teaching practices, motivated by the desire tobe change agents with respect to structural and societal issues within engineering, which areconcerns for the participants. However, addressing structural inequities in the engineeringcurriculum requires further development of their understanding of how to integrate criticalconsciousness into their teaching. Three categories of themes resulted from the analysis of thefaculty’s motivations and alignment with CRP: (1) Promoting Students’ Academic andProfessional Success through Equitable Teaching, (2) Fostering Cultural Awareness throughInclusive Pedagogy, and (3) Developing Critical Consciousness for Addressing Societal Impactin Engineering
mentoring. She serves as an instructor for core first-year engineering courses such as E101: Introduction to Engineering & Problem Solving and E102: Engineering for the 21st Century. Her commitment extends to undergraduate and graduate-level research courses, where she fosters an environment of innovation and discovery. She established the study abroad program for E101 for Quito, Ecuador for Spring 2024 and is now the program director for the study abroad program for E101 for Prague, Czech for Spring 2025. Dr. Qaqish’s academic journey reflects her dedication to learning and excellence. She earned her Bachelor of Science in Biomedical Engineering from Boston University, followed by a Master of Science in
strongly agree (5). To mitigate response bias, theoriginal instruments contained some items that were worded such that the responses had to bereverse coded; we retained that wording.The scales were developed for K-12 education; therefore, we edited some of the terms to makethem applicable to higher education (e.g., faculty instead of teachers, institution instead ofschool). Because we were interested in STEM education, we also modified some of the languageso it was specific to STEM instead of using general references. For example, an originalprofessional beliefs item was: “Historically, education has been monocultural, reflecting onlyone reality and has been biased toward the dominant (European) Group” (Pohan & Aguilar2001). We reworded it as