://nyti.ms/o6JvaR 3. Boyd D, Ellison N (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1): 210-230. 4. Michael Carter, Gerald C. Gannod, Janet E. Burge, Mladen Vouk, Paul V. Anderson, and Mark E. Hoffman (2011). “Communication Genres: Integrating Communication into the Software Engineering Curriculum”, in Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training, IEEE. 5. DiMicco JM, Millen D, Geyer W, Dugan C, Brownholtz B, Muller M (2008). Motivations for social networking at work. In Proceedings of CSCW 2008, San Diego, CA, USA: 711-720. 6. Duffy, J. (2011, December 28). Google users estimated at 62 million. PC
module quizzes and student opinion surveysand the results indicate that there is an increase in student performance and student satisfactionafter having completed the learning modules.Introduction The finite element (FE) method is a widely used tool in industry for analyzing engineering problems. The most basic FE theory and applications are offered primarily as a graduate- level course, or in some cases, as an upper-level elective for undergraduate students. Therefore, the majority of engineering programs do not require coverage of FE theory and application as a component of their undergraduate curriculum. Industry is placing an increased emphasis on the ability to apply this powerful computational tool; so it follows that
AC 2012-4953: MENTORING WOMEN FACULTY IN STEM: A MULTI-PRONGED APPROACHDr. Jenna P. Carpenter, Louisiana Tech University Dr. Jenna P. Carpenter is Associate Dean for Administration and Strategic Initiatives in the College of Engineering and Science at Louisiana Tech University. She is also Wayne and Juanita Spinks Professor of Mathematics and Director of the Office for Women in Science and Engineering. Dr. Carpenter serves as PI for Louisiana Tech’s NSF ADVANCE Program and is on the Board of Directors for WEPAN, as well as SWE Advisor at Louisiana Tech.Dr. D. Patrick O’Neal, Louisiana Tech University D. Patrick O’Neal is an Associate Professor in the Biomedical Engineering program, which is part of the College
PCs and Associated TechnologiesAbstractThe How People Learn framework1, 2 was utilized to redesign the course Advanced FoodChemistry (IA-530), which is part of Universidad de las Américas Puebla (UDLAP) foodengineering master and doctoral programs. Our goal was to improve graduate food chemistryteaching and learning by creating high-quality learning environments that promote an interactiveclassroom while integrating formative assessments into classroom practices by means of TabletPCs and associated technologies. In order to examine how students perceived the use of TabletPCs and associated technologies, we conducted semi-structured interviews with IA-530 graduatestudents that had completed the course. The analysis
ISA, and a member of ASEE. During the 2009-2010 academic year, he was a Fulbright Scholar at Notre Dame University, Lebanon.Dr. Rohitha Goonatilake, Texas A&M International University Rohitha Goonatilake received a Ph.D. in applied mathematics from Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, in 1997 and is currently working as an Associate Professor of mathematics in the Department of Engineer- ing, Mathematics, and Physics at Texas A&M International University. He was a Co-PI for a grant funded by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board for the 2010 Engineering Summer Program to provide enrichment for area middle and high school students to enter into careers in engineering. He is a mem- ber of American
various handy functions and enables group workcapabilities. The paper also provides intervention data in the classroom through the analysisof surveys collected among students.1. IntroductionNowadays, laboratories that work with hands-on experiments are among the core componentsof engineering studies. Hands-on experiments help efficiently digest theoretical concepts andtrain students to rely on the facts according to physical evidence. On the other hand, highequipment cost and the lack of the necessary maintenance and assistance have led to reducedimportance of hand-on laboratories on the curriculum. Software simulators, based onmathematical models, can be an alternative method to replace the traditional hands-onlaboratories; however, the valuable
AC 2012-3203: ENGINEERING STUDENT INVOLVEMENTDr. Kerry Meyers, University of Notre Dame Kerry L. Meyers is a professional faculty member in the College of Engineering at Notre Dame and an instructor and coordinator in the First-year Engineering program, and she is also involved with students at a variety of levels, including a graduate student teaching apprentice program, an undergraduate peer men- toring program, and STEM outreach (Expanding Your Horizon’s program). She has a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Purdue University, M.S. in mechanical engineering from Oakland University, and com- pleted her Ph.D. in engineering education at Purdue University. Meyers has several years of industrial experience in
turn in as a seniorfor college. (Group One) Page 25.856.5D. Application of Math and ScienceThe focus group participants expressed an understanding of the importance of havingopportunities to apply math and science learned in formal learning environments. One participantexplained the integration of the formal and informal learning environments:So as I would do MESA, I would get more encouraged and be wait, this is what I was learning inclass. So where I would learn something in class, I would use it in MESA, and when I wouldlearn something in MESA I would use it back in my class. You're realizing that this isn't justsomething you're doing for
). Organizational learning and organizational knowledge. Management Learning, 36(1): 49-68. 7. Cooper, A.C. (1973). Technical entrepreneurship. R&D Management, 3: 59-64. 8. Cooke, L., & Williams, S. (2004). Two approaches to using client projects in the college classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 67(2): 139-152. 9. Duch, B., Groh, S. & Allen, D. (2001). The power of problem-based learning. Stylus, Sterling, VA. 10. EGFSN (2007). Expert Group on Future Skills Needs. Available at: www.skillsireland.ie. 11. Elam, E., & Spotts, H. (2004). Achieving marketing curriculum integration: A live case study approach. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(1): 50–65. 12. Forfas (2009). Statement on
engineering and the other from electrical engineering. Bothinstructors had significant interest in the course content, including research projects involvingdesigns for low-resource environments. The course was offered as an Integrated Liberal andProfessional (ILP) course at Western New England University (WNE). Each student at WNE isrequired to complete one ILP course as part of their graduation requirements, thus the coursecounts toward the degree for engineering students as well as other majors.Throughout the semester, students attended lectures on a variety of global health topics including Page 25.728.3major diseases and the collection of data
AC 2012-3600: MIND LINKS 2012: RESOURCES TO MOTIVATE MI-NORITIES TO STUDY AND STAY IN ENGINEERINGDr. Maria M. Larrondo-Petrie, Florida Atlantic UniversityDr. Ivan E. Esparragoza, Pennsylvania State University Ivan E. Esparragoza is an Associate Professor of engineering at Penn State, Brandywine. His interests are in engineering design education, innovative design, global design, and global engineering education. He has introduced multinational design projects in a freshman introductory engineering design course in collaboration with institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean as part of his effort to contribute to the formation of world class engineers for the Americas. He is actively involved in the International
incritical thinking at a high cognitive level. In order to employ metacognitive strategies in theclassroom, teachers must implement the following strategies into their curriculum: (1) furtheringgeneral awareness of the significance of metacognition, (2) enhancing knowledge of cognition,(3) enhancing control of cognition, and (4) encouraging environments that advancemetacognitive awareness. Activities and assignments should be designed in such a way that thestudents are actively thinking and engaging the concepts and principles of the course. Well-organized teaching or the use of developmental strategies may offset large variances in IQ6. One of the most important goals of an instructor is to involve students in the learningprocess, so
AC 2012-3493: AN INITIAL ANALYSIS OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENTWHILE LEARNING FOOD ANALYSIS BY MEANS OF A VIDEO GAMEMr. Jose del Carmen Chin VeraProf. Aurelio Lopez-Malo, Universidad de las Amricas, Puebla Aurelio Lopez-Malo is professor and Past Chair, Department of Chemical, Food, and Environmental En- gineering, at Universidad de las Amricas, Puebla, in Mexico. He teaches food science and engineering- related courses. His research interests include emerging technologies for food processing, natural antimi- crobials, and active learningDr. Enrique Palou, Universidad de las Amricas, Puebla Enrique Palou is Director, Center for Science, Engineering, and Technology Education in the Department of Chemical, Food, and
presentations at numerous conferences, co-authored three text books, and written an invited book chapter and several lab manuals. She is a member of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, the American Society of Engineering Educators, the Materials Research Society, and ASM International. Her primary research interests are in curriculum design for materials education, STEM learning, and acoustic properties of materials.Dr. Sue Guenter-Schlesinger, Western Washington University Sue Guenter-Schlesinger is Vice Provost for Equal Opportunity and Employment Diversity at Western Washington University. Previously, she served 14 years as Assistant Executive Vice President, Equal Op
second stage data analysis5. DiscussionThrough analyzing data related to engineering students’ college experiences on Twitter, wefound a large number of tweets complaining about homework, classes, professors, exams, andstudying. Negative tweets are overwhelmingly more numerous than positive tweets. Thisindicates an imbalance between academic life and social life among engineering students. A poordesign of curriculum is also revealed. For example, many students complain that sociology andhistory classes are useless to engineering majors, and chemistry class is useless to computerengineering majors. These classes need to be better designed and tuned to the needs ofengineering students.As stated in a previous APS study11, if engineering education
Classroom Teaching Techniques – An Effectiveness Methodology for Aerospace Concepts?AbstractMost engineering courses require some level of work to be done by students using internet. Avast majority of material taught in classes is available online. Theoretically, a student could learnalmost everything they want from the online resources. In this research, a comparative study isdone between students learning and understanding when some basic aerospace concepts aretaught in a traditional lecture based classroom versus when students are told to look for the samematerial on the internet. The results indicate that, although all the material taught in theclassroom is available on the internet, students do not perform better when they
positive stories from the first two GEECS mentor groups have set the stagefor widespread participation of current and future GEECS members.The initial mentorship activities have established a protocol to build from. The program wouldbenefit from continued refinement including further grounding in scholarship on goal setting,monitoring rigorously to ensure a standard implementation, and identifying future participants.We envision the possibility of the mentorship activities becoming integrated into curriculum atuniversities with sustainable engineering education graduate programs, which would provide anopportunity to encourage students outside their comfort zone. For institutions that cannot supportsuch interventions, the program may benefit from
Management of an Industry-Sponsored Multidisciplinary Capstone ProjectAbstractThe Engineering Education Innovation Center at The Ohio State University has offered, throughits Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program a broad range of opportunities forengineering and non-engineering students by incorporating authentic industry-sponsored projectsinto the curriculum. The program provides students the opportunity to apply their education anddevelop professional skills in real-world problems by incorporating different student andindustry interests through its four sub-programs; Industry-Sponsored Projects, Industry-Sponsored Product Design Projects; Social Innovation and Commercialization; and JointMechanical/Bio-medical
AC 2012-3049: FACULTY BELIEFS OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND DE-SIGN EDUCATION: AN EXPLORATORY STUDY COMPARING ENTREPRENEUR-SHIP AND DESIGN FACULTYDr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the College of Engineering at Penn State University. In this role, she provides support to faculty in trying innovative ideas in the classroom. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis in applied testing and measurement. Her current research interests include integrating creativity into the engineering curriculum, development in- struments to measure the engineering professional skills, and using qualitative data to enhance
, vendors, and pricing. Several measurements are requiredfor calculation of efficiency of a fuel cell and several variables could be rather easily controlledin order to determine their effects on efficiency. Therefore, with these considerations in mind,this proposal was accepted. Other factors considered in the selection of this equipment wererelatively easy setup, fairly user-friendly operation, adaptability to small student teams, and theability to be integrated with current laboratory data acquisition hardware and software. In orderto provide the students taking the Experimental Mechanics course with an ill-defined or open-ended problem experience per course objectives, students were tasked, as stated in the projectabstract, to research fuel
a large community ofengineering educators that feels these techniques need to be integrated in the classroom.Research has shown that these pedagogies create an environment that is more engaging to thestudents. However, a possible downfall of these techniques is that they can become timeconsuming and if not integrated properly can become the focus of a course taking away fromlearning the fundamentals.Engineering educators can “fit a project in” on a micro level by the addition of new techniquesperiodically in class. On the macro level, the question is how one can create a complete overhaulof a particular curriculum while maintaining the integrity of the content. To answer this questionwe look to the engineering design process. The same
analysis and integration use modeling and simulation at different degrees3: Page 25.1072.3A model: is a representation of an object.A simulation: is the act of an object or its model performing in an actual or simulated environment. Figure 2 – Different realization tools3As shown in Fig. 2, analysis is performed with mostly simulation and some modeling. Integration isperformed with mostly modeling and some simulation. It is also obvious that both analysis andsimulation are mostly logical and analytical in nature while modeling and integration are more holisticand creative in nature.Realization
campus student organizations.Additionally, the Engineering Department has recently been awarded federal grant funds aimedat strengthening its programs. This includes a Minority Science and Engineering ImprovementProgram (MSEIP) grant from the US Department of Education, an Innovations in EngineeringEducation, Curriculum, and Infrastructure ( IEECI) grant from NSF, and a CurriculumImprovement Improvements Partnership Award for the Integration of Research (CIPAIR) grant.The Cañada College NSF S-STEM program team recognizes the need to increase therepresentation of students from other disciplines, and plans to involve more faculty from thesedisciplines in future recruitment efforts. As an initial step, two new faculty mentors have beenadded to this
freshmen engineering programs, math success, K-12 STEM curriculum and accreditation, and retention and recruitment of STEM majors. Page 25.1087.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Promoting STEM Faculty Members’ Reflection on their Teaching PracticeAs part of an institutional focus on STEM student success, a group of eight STEM faculty fromacross the STEM disciplines participated in a year-long faculty learning community (FLC). Thefacilitated experience was designed to support the professional development of faculty throughexploration and
engineering training with an emphasis on engineeringdesign, systems thinking, and sustainability. Our goal is to train this engineering versatilist. Webelieve that exposure to engineering design can help students develop their problem solvingskills, teach them to better synthesize information, and exercise skills required to integrate andanalyze knowledge. Consequently, courses in engineering design represent the spine (boldedcourses with a white background in Figure 1) of our integrated engineering curriculum.2Students are first exposed to engineering design during their freshman year with reverseengineering modules in our Introduction to Engineering course. Then, sophomore through senioryear, students enroll sequentially in our six-course design
, Page 25.234.3provided they satisfy all other admission requirements of the institution and program. After beingadmitted, the student will follow a specified “completion curriculum” for the baccalaureatedegree that is founded on the body of knowledge obtained in the associate’s degree. To beentitled to pursue the degree completion curriculum after being admitted, the student mustcomplete the prescribed courses with an overall GPA of at least 2.5, and with no grade lowerthan “C.” No further testing or evaluation will be required.The model Associate of Science in Engineering Science curriculum was developed to providestudents with the foundational knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for successful pursuit ofa baccalaureate engineering
that provide a significant design experience. While most engineering programs around theworld introduce design at distinct points in a curriculum, such as freshman and capstone design courses,we present the concept of a “4-D” design pedagogy, where design is integrated across courses, semesters,years, and extra-curricular activities. This pedagogy, or framework, may be implemented in whole or inpart in any engineering program.Building on this design pedagogy, we present the context of designiettes in terms of educational theories,the I-Engineering, and assessment. We then explore the strategic development and use of designiettes,and present a literature review on small scale design project efforts as they relate to the concept ofdesigniettes
formanufacturability. Through working on this project, students will be able to study a complexengineering and technology system that: (1) exposes them to applied and cutting-edgetechnologies; (2) encourages them to participate in an integrated, interdisciplinary curriculum;and (3) involves them in methods of applied technology and skills necessary to transition fromacademic to professional environments.1. Introduction Rapid advancement in technology has laid a path for the design and manufacture of manyinterdisciplinary integrated technologies. These advancements have provided new avenues forthe engineering educators to better prepare tomorrows global citizens through methods capableof responding to the challenges of tomorrow1. On the other hand, the
students through the lens of identity theory (NSF BRIGE grant), advancing problem-based learning methodologies (NSF CCLI grant), assessing student learning, and un- derstanding and integrating complex problem solving in undergraduate engineering education (NSF CA- REER grant). Her other research interests lie in cardiovascular fluid mechanics, sustainability, and K-12 engineering outreach.Dr. Eric C. Pappas, James Madison University Eric Pappas is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering and Department of Integrated Science and Technology at James Madison University. Email: PappasEC@jmu.edu.Dr. Robert L. Nagel, James Madison University Robert Nagel is an Assistant Professor in the School of Engineering at
Page 25.88.3developed in the SE domain. They are used for workforce development and education. The SECapstone project goals listed below have the numbers of relevant competencies from AppendixA noted: Identify the needs and objectives of key stakeholders including the operational and life-cycle context, and how these shape and set the scope for the development program (2, 4, 5). Demonstrate recognition that the value of a system is largely embodied in the interaction among its components, and not in the components themselves when addressing stakeholder requirements (6, 8). Demonstrate an ability to produce a well thought out system design and well managed interface specifications as critical to successful system integration (6