expertise, particularly concerningSTEM course adaptation. This contrast with Amanda’s experience highlights the variability ininstitutional responses to accessibility, reinforcing the need for more specialized support inhigher education.Research and Development in Accessibility TechnologyThroughout his education, Gene’s lived experiences shaped his commitment to developingaccessibility technology. His roles at the University of Washington, Northeastern University, andthe University of Chicago allowed him to contribute to projects enhancing accessibility,including shape shifting devices and 3D modeling tools. His work on automated knittingmachines producing tactile graphics exemplifies his focus on bridging technology and disability,and he has
changes andconsiderations for collecting data, capturing relevant insights from participants, and documentingthe process to achieve these objectives in four STEM outreach programs held during the summerof 2024.The increasing demand for skilled professionals in STEM underscores the importance ofattracting and retaining students in these fields. According to projections, the workforce needsfor engineers are expected to grow significantly, driven by advancements in technology and theevolving nature of the global economy [2]. However, this anticipated growth presents achallenge: women and minorities remain significantly underrepresented in STEM occupations,despite various initiatives aimed at increasing diversity and inclusion [3]. This lack
integrating group projects and collaborative assignments. • Engaging Content Delivery: The incorporation of surveys, questionnaires, discussion prompts, videos, webinars, and infographics can improve the quality of online lectures. Comprehension and interest can be enhanced by dividing lectures into brief segments and correlating concepts to real-world scenarios. • Updated Resources: The learning experience is improved by maintaining a diverse and current selection of course materials. Ensuring that resources are accessible across devices and that they are updated with the most recent research, trends, and case studies can accommodate a variety of learning styles. Regular student feedback is
systematic literature reviews, includingconducting comprehensive searches of reputable databases, applying pre-determined selectioncriteria, performing an extraction of data, and a determination and report of findings (Borrego etal., 2014). Our processes are described further.Search Procedures and Search StringsA search for information sources to study the gender gap among Middle Eastern femaleengineering students was conducted. Specifically, we used the database Education Source tosearch for articles. We used one database because this was a preliminary project. Based on ourinclusion criteria, we sought to locate articles which were: ● Included college-age participants from a Middle Eastern country, ● Which discussed gendered differences.Given
assistant), professors may opt for assessments that are easier to grade, such as multiple-choice exams or assignments with clear-cut answers, instead of more time-consuming butpotentially more meaningful forms of evaluation, like essays or project-based assessments.My findings overall highlight a misalignment of priorities among faculty. This excessive focuson preventing dishonesty can overshadow efforts to address more impactful aspects of education,such as refining course content, developing innovative teaching strategies, and creating a moreenriching learning experience for students [33], [34].. Instead, faculty should also balance inemphasizing improving test design and preparation strategies, which can be more effective andbeneficial to
not see this as a systemsproblem.Financial barriers to internships and experiential learning. Experiential learning is a hallmark ofthe University’s undergraduate education, but access is very unevenly distributed amongstudents, with UR/US students reporting more barriers to access—such as the need for easytransportation to get to an internship or project site, and the inability to take do co-curricularactivities that are unpaid or after typical class hours, when they need to work. Uneven fundingacross schools and majors contributes to these barriers, making this an institutional barrier.Advising. This study treated advising as an institutional matter, and not as an “academic” matterbecause it happens outside of the formal learning
, making, while business training might prioritize and self-directed learning. Incorporating tools like AI- scenario-based leadership, risk assessment, and assisted personalized learning or experiential projects strategic thinking; bridges abstract concepts with practical significance. These approaches promote motivation and ownership o Public libraries, community centers, and online of learning while reinforcing the development of platforms can host free workshops on digital higher-order thinking skills vital in the modern world. literacy, critical thinking, and cybersecurity awareness to
to worry about food or having a placeto sleep. I’ve always lived like a princess.” His parents offer emotional and financialstability, creating a secure environment that allows him to focus on his studies. As far asacademic guidance goes, Phil appreciates the support provided by engineering faculty,describing a mentor’s role as pivotal in his personal and professional growth. He says,“Professor Patel is easily my favorite professor. I started doing [design] with him, and wedo research projects. You can just tell he's always looking out for his students. he's verypersonal. He, he's kind of, you know, he feels like a, like a family member in some ways.”Here, we can see that while Phil does not receive engineering support from his
model latent variables and relationships to other socioeconomic variablesin tandem. We identified that three latent factors, Parent Educational Involvement, HouseholdEducational Resources, and School Hindrances existed and that differences across the sample arean outcome of broader socioeconomic inequality driven by racism, sexism, and classism. Thispaper discusses the development of this model, our findings, and potential implications for futureresearch, including our larger project which uses the measure to predict engineering studentapplication to, and enrollment and persistence in, engineering.Keywords: low-income students, social inequality, Intersectionality Theory, student successIntroductionLow-income students, referred to henceforth as
their classrooms more inclusive and supportive for allstudents. This includes giving students tools to be aware of the impact of their projects,motivating students from diverse backgrounds, and ensuring that students feel safe in theclassroom. Building a community of equity-minded faculty and learning from peers are alsosignificant motivators. Participants value the opportunity to collaborate with colleagues whoshare a commitment to DEI and create systemic change within engineering education. They seekto center DEI as a driver of innovation and to change the mindset that DEI does belong inengineering. Participants showcase a strong desire to be agents of change by turning DEIawareness into action and addressing structural and societal issues