, 2019. [2] A. Osta and K. D. Dahm, “Work in progress: Integrating entrepreneurial mind-set within undergraduate engineering course projects,” in 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2019. [3] E. Davishahl, T. A. Vannelli, M. J. Babcock, and D. Hanley, “The seecrs scholar academy at whatcom community college: Three cohorts of s-stem scholarships later,” in 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, 2021. [4] M. E. Van Den Bogaard, D. Reeping, C. Finelli, and J. Millunchick, “Student experiences with the online learning environment during covid,” in 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2022. [5] M. Mosleh, P. Chandran, A. P. Maclin, J. Harkless, C. J. Robinson, H. Salmani, S. T. Smith, G. Washington
. The plexiglass platform wasexactly what we wanted it to do, while being extremely user initially designed as an L-shape as seen in fig. 2, butfriendly and was an open source platform. was later changed to a square platform for more space. Due to the fact, the low cost remote control car’s steeringmechanism consisted of just a DC motor; we used a motordriver that paired well with the Arduino Uno to turn theArduino signal into a physical action. While the initial prototype completed its intended task, weunderstood our final model would require a higher velocityand a more advanced steering control. This brought us to thebeginning of our senior year. IV. I N -D E P T H D E S IG N C O N
all 50 states of the U.S. Missouri S&T is thestate of Missouri school for providing teacher training, professional development and programinformation for counselors and administrators in the Midwest region. PLTW provides programsto more than 5,000 elementary, middle, and high schools in all 50 states and the District ofColumbia1. As a rapidly growing program, the Missouri PLTW network currently has 238programs in 198 high schools and middle schools [2]. Project Lead The Way (PLTW) [1]currently has PLTW Launch (K-5), PLTW Gateway (Middle), PLTW Engineering (HighSchool), PLTW Biomedical Science (High School) and PLTW Computer Science (K-12)programs [1].There have been several studies comparing academic performance of PLTW students with non
and Health-related Outcomes in a National Sample of College Students,” Am. J. Health Educ., vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 383–394, 2020, doi: 10.1080/19325037.2020.1822242.[4] S. K. Lipson, J. Raifman, S. Abelson, and S. L. Reisner, “Gender minority mental health in the US: Results of a national survey on college campuses,” Am. J. Prev. Med., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 293–301, 2019.[5] E. De Pillis and L. De Pillis, “Are engineering schools masculine and authoritarian? The mission statements say yes,” Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, vol. 1, no. 1. p. 33, 2008.[6] J. C. Garvey and C. V. Dolan, “Queer and Trans College Student Success,” in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research: Volume 36, L. W. Perna, Ed., in
Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions," Educational Psychology Review , vol. 29, pp. 119-140, 2017.[2] G. S. Weissmann, R. A. Ibarra, M. Howland-Davis and R. A. I. M. H.-D. &. Gary S. Weissmann, "The Multicontext Path to Redefining How We Access and Think about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in STEM," Journal of Geoscience Education, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 320-29, 2019.[3] J. S. Brotman and F. M. Moore, "Girls and Science: A Review of Four Themes in the Science Education Literature," JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 971-1002, 2008.[4] H. I. Scutt, S. K. Gilmartin, S. D. Sheppard and S. R. Brunhaver, "Research-Informed Practices for Inclusive
work andthe experiences that prepared them for their global job tasks (RQ3).AcknowledgementsThis material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (EEC-2308607).Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are thoseof the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.References[1] J. M. Grandin and E. D. Hirleman, “Educating engineers as global citizens: A call for action / A report of the national summit meeting on the globalization of engineering education,” Online J. Glob. Eng. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2009.[2] K. A. Davis and D. B. Knight, “Comparing students’ study abroad experiences and outcomes across global contexts,” Int. J. Intercult. Relat
Foundation.References 1. Canney, N. E., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2016). Validity and reliability evidence of the engineering professional responsibility assessment tool. Journal of engineering education, 105(3), 452-477. 2. Murthy, J. N., Lavanya, C., & Kosaraju, S. (2020). Ethics in engineering profession: Pedagogy and practices. In K. Kumar & J. P. Davim (Eds.), Methodologies and outcomes of engineering and technological pedagogy (pp. 296-318). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2245-5.ch0143. Niles, S., Contreras, S., Roudbari, S., Kaminsky, J., & Harrison, J. L. (2020). Resisting and assisting engagement with public welfare in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 109(3), 491
students for learning digital electronics,” Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 615–630, May 2019, doi: 10.1002/cae.22102.[4] S. Martin et al., “Design of an augmented reality system for immersive learning of digital electronic,” in 2020 XIV Technologies Applied to Electronics Teaching Conference (TAEE), IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6.[5] P. Lucas, D. Vaca, F. Dominguez, and X. Ochoa, “Virtual circuits: An augmented reality circuit simulator for engineering students,” in 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), IEEE, 2018, pp. 380–384.[6] Z. Pan, J. Polden, N. Larkin, S. Van Duin, and J. Norrish, “Recent progress on programming methods for industrial robots,” in ISR 2010 (41st
computing education and its longitudinal impact on ethical decision making. Futurestudies could also measure the framework’s impact on students’ problem-solving abilities,especially when dealing with even more complex, real-world security or privacy challenges.AcknowledgementThis research is supported by the National Science Foundation (Award #: 2335681).AppendixS. Shin, J. Lee, S. Lim, and S. Shin. “Draft of ethical motivation and behavioral intention surveyin engineering education,” American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference,June 22-25, 2025, Montreal, Canada, 2025.Sample Survey Items for Ethical Motivation and Behavioral IntentionWe used a 6-point Likert scale (including “Don’t Know” as an option) for this survey. Thesurvey is
,including during their pre-college careers. Radunzel et al.’s recent study [7, p. 1] found that“students with both expressed and measured interest in STEM were more likely to persist andcomplete a STEM degree than those with either expressed or measured interest only, as well asthose with no interest in STEM.” Furthermore, research is investigating the troubling phenomenaof extended time to finish college and higher drop-out rates for STEM programs as compared toothers [e.g., 8].STEM by the numbersPines [9] writes that “one of the greatest and most enduring strengths of the United States hasbeen its ability to attract global talent in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics(STEM) to bolster its economic and technological competitiveness
. Mosterman et al., “Virtual engineering laboratories: Design and experiments,” J. Eng. Educ., vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 279–285, 1994, doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.1994.tb01116.x.[3] M. Abdulwahed and Z. K. Nagy, “The impact of the virtual lab on the hands-on lab learning outcomes, a two years empirical study,” Proc. 20th Annu. Conf. Australas. Assoc. Eng. Educ. Eng. Curric., no. March, pp. 255–260, 2009.[4] M. D. Koretsky and A. J. Magana, “Using technology to enhance learning and engagement in engineering,” Adv. Eng. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–53, 2019.[5] R. Heradio, L. De La Torre, D. Galan, F. J. Cabrerizo, E. Herrera-Viedma, and S. Dormido, “Virtual and Remote Labs in Education: a Bibliometric Analysis
environmental and biological engineering students for Spring 2020, Fall 2020 and Spring 2021. Table 5.2 and Fig. 5.2 depict the change in the Mean and Standard Deviation of SE and PV for the combined Pre and Post Surveys respectively. Table. 5.1 Trend in the means of the SE and PV of environmental and biological engineering students for the 3 semesters SELF-EFFICACY PERCEIVED VALUEMajor PRE-SURVEY POSTSURVEY PRE-SURVEY POST-SURVEY S’20 F’20 S’21 S’20 F’20 S’21 S’20 F’20 S’21 S’20 F’20 S’21 4.35 3.86
responded topublic health concerns associated with the virus [6]. As a result, “lessons learned” have alreadybeen published about the barriers faced by student and professional teams in the academic andnon-academic workplaces, respectively [3]–[5]. This study is intended to contribute to this emerging body of knowledge about the behavior of virtual and in-person student design teamsoperating under pandemic-induced conditions.BackgroundTeam development can be described in terms of Bruce Tuckman’s four stages, which hedeveloped in the mid-1960’s based on an extensive review of the literature, and re-visited in1977 [1], [2]. These four stages are described in Table 1 below:Table 1: Tuckman’s Team Development Stages and Their Key Characteristics [1
studies may uncover whether such networkconnectivity sustains even after the end of the semester. The study is also inconclusive on howsocial media interactions on a STEM topic may influence knowledge building. The study waslimited to the class of Construction Material and Methods; more efforts are needed to find outwhether such network growth patterns exist in different STEM courses.REFERENCES[1] S. Hasan, S. Ukkusuri, H. Gladwin, and P. Murray-Tuite, “Behavioral model to understand household-level hurricane evacuation decision making,” J. Transp. Eng., vol. 137, no. 5, pp. 341– 348, 2011, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000223.[2] A. M. Sadri, S. Hasan, S. V. Ukkusuri, and J. E. Suarez Lopez, “Analysis of social interaction
education facultymembers, industry practitioner(s), context experts, instructional specialists, and graduate and/orundergraduate teaching assistants. X-teams use an iterative design thinking process andreflection to explore pedagogical strategies. X-teams are also serving as change agents for therest of the department through communities of practice referred to as Y-circles.Y-circles, comprised of X-team members, faculty, staff, and undergraduate and graduate studentsin the department, are contributing to an organizational culture that fosters and sustainsinnovations in engineering education through an agile framework that blends severaldocumented change theories, including collaborative transformation, crucial conversations, andessential tension
and places it for assembly 3) Robot 3 assembles the cap on the markerworking of multiple robots controlled safely with the PLC. Three teams work on three differentrobots to program individual tasks.The color of the markers, blue, red and pink are chosen in the increasing order of contrast. Thebelt being black in color makes it difficult for the robot to detect the dark colors such as blue.The students have to adjust the environment lighting and create enough brightness for the camerato detect the blue contrast. The caps are placed in the search region of robot 3 and the openmarkers are placed in the region of robot 2. The robot 2’s vision system detects the markersposition and orientation in ascending order of contrast (blue, red and pink
things in nature (e.g., butterflies, rocks) Page 26.1552.5 star Observed or studied stars and other astronomical objects group Participated in science groups/clubs/camps comp Participated in science/math competition(s) nonfic Read/Watched non-fiction science Abbreviation Reported Interest/Experience scifi Read/Watched science fiction game Played computer/video games prog Wrote computer programs or designed web pages talk Talked with friends or family about scienceResults and
teachers.References1. Kermanshachi, S. and Safapour, E. (2017), “Assessing Students' Higher EducationPerformance in Minority and Non-Minority Serving Universities,” Proceedings of Frontiersin Education (FIE), IEEE, Indianapolis, Indiana, October 3-6, 2017.2. Jahan Nipa, T., and Kermanshachi, S. (2018), “Analysis and Assessment of GraduateStudents’ Perception and Academic Performance Using Open Educational Resource (OER)Course Materials”, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City,UT, June 24-27, 2018.3. McCarthy, J. P. and Anderson, L. Active Learning Techniques Versus traditionalteaching styles: Two experiments from history and Political Science. Innovative highereducation, 24 (4), 2000.4. Kermanshachi, S
” -pu ex d pe an ns cta e m io ti on s “d ta t c pe ex Figure 1. Triangular Perspectives of the “Stakeholder” PopulationsIn summary, the current research project seeks to answer those questions by presenting amethodological approach to define an expert
inboldface for purposes of explanation in this paper, but boldfacing is not a part of the SDLlanguage.) The similarities between SDL syntax and VHDL syntax are obvious. -- Listing 1. An SDL circuit description file for a half-adder. circuit HALFADD port(x,y: in bit; s,c: out bit) begin s = xor(x,y) c = and(x,y) end HALFADDOutputs. When the student opens a circuit description file in the SDL analyzer, he sees acopy of it in the program’s "circuit" window, and several command buttons representingavailable action options. Clicking on the "Truth Table" command button produces thetruth table of the circuit in the "results" window. Clicking on the "Interactive" commandbutton puts the program into its interactive mode
included adoption of contextualculturally relevant teaching practices, recognizing indigenous worldviews, respecting communityand family, and supporting indigenous knowledge systems.MethodologyKhan et al. established a process for conducting a systematic literature review: [6] (1) frame thequestion, (2) identify relevant work, (3) assess study quality, (4) create a summary, and (5)interpret findings. We have framed the question in the previous section. Khan et al.’s final twosteps, summary and interpretation, are found in the Results and Discussion sections below.In addition to following the Khan et al. methodology, we also observed the guidelines found inthe PRISMA 2020 statement, [7] specifically the paper and abstract checklists. Figure 1 is
alumni of our graduate program who have developed new ways of thinking and acting through our leadership development process.Data on Engineers Moving into Management Figure 1. S&E bachelor‟s degree holders in management jobs by years since degree (NSF 2003)National Science Foundation SESTAT 20031 data (Figure 1) shows that increasing numbers ofengineering graduates leave the direct practice of engineering over time and move intomanagement. This NSF report also shows that there is a corresponding fewer number of Page 22.1546.2engineering graduates whose major work activity is R&D as they progress in their careers(Figure 2
Development, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 385-401, 2017.[6] E. Cech and T. Waidzunas, "“Engineers Who Happen To Be Gay”: Lesbian, Gay, And Bisexual Students’ Experiences In Engineering," in 2009 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2009.[7] E. Cech and T. Waidzunas, "Navigating the heteronormativity of engineering: the experiences of lesbian, gay, and bisexual students," Engineering Studies, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-24, 2011.[8] A. Haverkamp, "The Complexity of Nonbinary Gender Inclusion in Enigneering Culture," in ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, 2018.[9] A. Haverkamp, A. Butler, N. S. Pelzl, M. K. Bothwell, D. Montfort and Q.-L. Driskill, "Exploring Transgender and Gender Nonconforming Engineering Undergraduate Experiences
based learning environment. She was previously an engineering education postdoctoral fellow at Wake Forest University supporting curriculum development around ethics/character education.Dr. Diana Bairaktarova, Virginia Tech Dr. Diana Bairaktarova is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Through real-world engineering applications, Dr. Bairaktarovaˆa C™s experiential learning research spans from engineering to psychology to learning ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Empathy and mindfulness in design education: A literature review to explore a relationshipAbstractLearning to design in undergraduate
. Theexosystem follows, encapsulating indirect environments (e.g., experiences of roommate ingraduate school but in a different degree program and conversations with the individual aboutthese experiences). The macrosystem level includes social and cultural values, whereas the finalchronosystem level pertains to transitions in environment(s) over time, respectively [21]. It isimportant to note that there is a bidirectional relationship between a person and theirenvironment; that is, they both can impact one another (discussed via the process-person-context-time [PPCT] language) [5].Godfrey & Parker’s Culture of Engineering Education Framework (CEEF)CEEF was used to provide context to the environment and systems engineering graduatestudents
discipline. This analysis willassist the authors in critically reviewing the design of the VR lessons from the aspect of the fourdimensions to identify improvement strategies.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Honghe Wang, Dr. Mandoye Ndoye, and Dr. ChitraNayak for developing and implementing the VR lessons in biology, electrical engineering, andphysics. This work was funded by NSF Grant # 1912047.References[1] [Online]. https://www.verdict.co.uk/history-virtual-reality-timeline/ [Accessed on Feb 2022].[2] [Online]. https://virtualspeech.com/blog/history-of-vr [Accessed on Feb 2022].[3] [Online]. https://www.viaccess-orca.com/hubfs/VR%20Timeline.pdf [Accessed on Feb2022].[4] H. Cherni, S. Nicolas, and N. Metayer. “Using
engineersLanguage ScaffoldsMany youth, including ELs, are developing language proficiency. Few STEM and engineeringcurricula have been designed to scaffold participation and language development. The YES teamreviewed research and best practices and consulted with experts to generate a set of research-based approaches that invite meaningful participation by ELs. The embedded scaffolds andstrategies are designed to support language development across reading, writing, listening, andspeaking domains and include: • Discussion strategies • Content presented multimodally • Encouragement of home language(s) • Vocabulary presented in context • Strategic groups • Scaffolded writing • Hands-on exploration • Key sentence frames • Multimodal
and Computer Engineering. Her research focuses on shifting the culture of engineering via the study of engineering identity which centers students of color and examines systemic change.Peter C Nelson (Professor & Dean)Jeremiah AbiadeDidem Ozevin (Dr.) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com An Integrated Program for Recruitment, Retention, and Graduation of Academically Talented Low-Income Engineering Students: Lessons Learned and Progress ReportAbstractThis paper provides the status report of an NSF S-STEM program that is currentlyin its fourth year in the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois atChicago (UIC), a
) creating examples and projectsis one delivery mechanism but there could be a steep learning curve student will encounter [27], 6) currentdemands from larger employers who may not all use these techniques, and lastly [28]; 7) Creating newtracks is possible but requires new resources and faculty to teach them. Given these benefits and challenges,many engineering students are still often pushed to take computer science course(s) to compensate for theirlack of in-department offerings. This research looks to help overcome several aspects of these barriers inthe discipline specific domains of architectural engineering (AE) and material science and engineering(MATSE). Both fields were selected given their renewed emphasis and need for more data skills as