situationsthat exist which could be capitalized on by developing a new product or service.Creating a Business from OpportunitiesOnce the survey had been completed and the potential opportunities that exist had beenrecognized by each student, the class came together as a group. The areas of potentialopportunity that each student identified were shared with the class. Each of the ideas werecompared to one another to identify the top ideas with the best potential. One of the nextsteps performed by students is to design the company. Students started from developing thename of the company for the service or product that it provided. This is beneficial because itshowed the students that there are many possibilities for entrepreneurship and it also showedthem
Education and Sustainable Development from Kathmandu University, a master’s in Biosystems Engineering from Michigan State University and a dual-major doctorate in Biosystems Engineering and Environmental Engineering from Michigan State. Dr. Aryal’s research interests are in water quality, hydrology, phytoremediation, agricultural conservation practices, urban best- management practices (BMPs), and ecological engineering. Pertaining to education, his interests are in innovative instructional techniques to enhance student motivation and learning.Gautam Biswas Gautam Biswas conducts research in Intelligent Systems with primary interests in monitoring, control, and fault adaptivity of complex cyber-physical systems. In
ethnically diverse (non-white or Caucasian) and 14% women.Over 40% of the student population is enrolled in one of the three engineering degrees. Whilethe freshmen may demonstrate an interest in the minor and may be targeted for future marketingefforts, they are not eligible to begin the MC minor. Likewise, the seniors are too close tograduation to begin the minor. Therefore, only the second and third year students (sophomoresand juniors) are candidates for the program. As stated previously, the best time for a student toenroll in the MC minor is sophomore year. Of the current junior class (graduating in year 2020),there are 60 engineering students who have a GPA above 2.5, making them eligible to enroll inan academic minor. Of those 60, 22 have
. Saadeddine Shehab, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and informal learning environments. My Research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025WIP: Using a Human-Centered
journey through their education to someone preparing for a standard tripin the section below.Before someone starts on a journey they typically consult a map to make sure they know wherethey currently are and where they are planning to go, so that they can chart a course of traveland best prepare for what is to come. Travelling to their specified final destination is madeeasier by having this sort of awareness. The same could be said of college engineering students,as they seemingly begin their education with the goal of becoming a practicing engineer. Theinstructors whose intentions are to teach and guide the students to this destination, have alreadytraveled to the end point of graduation that students wish to travel to. As such, the
was increased to 5 feet.The additions were: • There were constraints imposed on weight and size of the device and on operator contact with the device. • Multiple performance requirements were imposed (two different targets for which the device had to be pre-calibrated (no practice)). • Constraints (requirements) were placed on performance (five successful launches per eight attempts [four at each target]). • Goals were established (eight successful launches out of eight attempts, and a preference of a gravity-driven, light-weight design).An eight-page document completely describing the project was given to the class onAugust 24th, the first class meeting. The project continued throughout the semester. AnInitial
for graduates mentioned above, it becameclear that a comprehensive overhaul of the curriculum was needed. Over a period ofapproximately two years, the new electronic systems engineering technology curriculum wascreated through a process that involved faculty retreats and multiple cycles of industry feedback.6Throughout the process, an emphasis was placed on ensuring graduates would have the tools andexperiences necessary to be successful in the electronics product and system developmentindustries. This includes design and project management as well as support elements such asapplications development, maintenance and test. Today, the new curriculum has four main areasof focus: Embedded systems: Modern electronic products and systems are
the case if the program had not beenavailable. The SAS program targeted specific areas of concern that had been previouslyidentified by researchers, and the results were strikingly positive for those students who weresuccessful in completing the program. Even though the program implemented many of theknown best practices, there was still a large portion of students who dropped from the STEMprogram or who failed to achieve their academic goals. Some part of the attrition can beattributed to the “normal” erosion experienced by all STEM programs as students becomedisenchanted or lose interest and change to a non-STEM major.There is at least anecdotal evidence that a contributing factor to a student’s failure or success canbe attributed to their
UNM and Northern NewMexico College (NNMC) respectively, belong to Hispanic communities. Moreover, 8% of thestudent population at NNMC comes from Native American Communities in contrast to the 0.2%of Native American students at UNM. Therefore, the potential improvements in educationalaccess for underserved populations and professional networking among faculty and studentsstatewide are promising.This program is designed to create a sustainable model for sharing the expertise and resources ofa Carnegie Research University (classification: Very High) with educational institutions in NewMexico who serve academically underprepared students. New Mexico ranks 43rd in the nation inthe percentage of the population who complete high school, and 35th in
significantly lower level of belonging than major level students, men, andwhite students respectively. By creating a more connected and authentic student communityearlier in their academic career, we aim to increase levels of belonginess among these studentgroups and encourage continued connection and empathetic engagement throughout the students’college and professional experience.Assignment Description & Implementation DetailsThe story sharing assignment is assigned during the second week of a ten-week quarter in anovel introductory engineering course focused on developing a socio-technical mindset [5]. This2-credit course, ENGR 101: Engineering, Design, & Society, is a graduation requirement for allengineering and design students at Western
) workplaces. The RAB decides the themesbased on recent scholarship, interests of the community, and current events. Forexample, the RAB selected the 2019 theme of identity-based harassment given acombination of new reports on sex- and gender- based harassment released by theNational Academies, the #MeToo movement, and the dearth of literature consideringharassment from an intersectional perspective, for example, by looking at gender-based harassment in tandem and intertwined with race-based harassment ratherthan in isolation from one another.These two-day workshops are designed to engage participants in facilitated discussionson current research and practice, identify areas of synergy and unanswered questions,and then prioritize where additional or
of the Center for Educational Networks and Impacts at the Institute for Creativity, Arts, and Technology (ICAT). Her research interests include interdisciplinary collaboration, design education, communication studies, identity theory and reflective practice. Projects supported by the National Science Foundation include exploring disciplines as cultures, liberatory maker spaces, and a RED grant to increase pathways in ECE for the professional formation of engineers.Dr. David Gray, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Gray receieved his B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Virginia Tech in 2000. He then earned a M.S. and a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from Virginia Tech in
Kuchnicki is an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering at York College of Pennsylvania. Previously, he was a postdoctoral research associate at Rutgers University, specializing in computational modeling of dynamic deformations in solids. His areas of technical expertise include solid mechanics, crystal plasticity, vibration, and fluid-structure interaction. He received his PhD from Rutgers University in 2001. Page 15.555.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Experiences of Using Formula SAE as a Capstone Design ProjectAbstractCapstone Design courses are, by their nature, intended
laboratory courses. Dr. Kim and his collaborators attracted close to $1M research grants to study writing transfer of engineering undergraduates. For the technical research, he has a long-standing involvement in research concerned with manufacturing of advanced composite materials (CFRP/titanium stack, GFRP, nanocomposites, etc.) for automotive, marine, and aerospace applications. His recent research efforts have also included the fatigue behavior of manufactured products, with the focus of fatigue strength improvement of aerospace, automotive, and rail structures. He has been the author or co-author of over 200 peer-reviewed papers in these areas.John D Lynch John Lynch received the BSEE degree from the University of Utah in
is a Psychology graduate student at Penn State Behrend. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Assessment of Metacognitive Skills in Design and ManufacturingAbstractMetacognition is the understanding of your own knowledge including what knowledge you do nothave and what knowledge you do have. This includes knowledge of strategies and regulation ofone’s own cognition. Studying metacognition is important because higher-order thinking iscommonly used, and problem-solving skills are positively correlated with metacognition. Apositive previous disposition to metacognition can improve problem-solving skills. Metacognitionis a key skill in design and manufacturing, as teams of engineers must solve
engineering professors will often tell a student, “You HAVETO be superior at math to be an engineer.” This statement also implies that you have totake advanced placement math and AP Calculus in high school to succeed in anengineering college. Are these statements really true? And what impact do they have onthe student’s career choice?The authors suggest that it is a myth that students HAVE TO be excellent at math to bean engineer. Clearly math is a very important tool for engineers. All engineers musthave some level of competency at math. However, once students are no longer takingclasses at a university, the amount of math used in engineering positions varies widely.For many B.S. level engineers in the workplace, advanced math is not a regularly
designs andbuilds custom apparatuses, such as a rig for 2 DOF torsional system developed by Souza et al.4Also, with a custom apparatus, custom instrumentation and transducers are required – which mayor may not be research caliber instruments. One unique apparatus that the author experienced asa graduate student at The Pennsylvania State University in the 1990’s used an air-hockey liketrack to connect mass elements with springs and measured using accelerometers and a 2-channelHP analyzer. It worked well, but a leaf-blower like device was required to produce enough airflow, which was noisy and sometimes would break down. When parts break down on customapparatuses, repair or replacement is usually more difficult than a commercially
have gone on to be hired as Graduate Teaching Assistants forECE’s technical communication-focused courses after being accepted into the School’s graduateprogram. Initial plans are underway to codify the peer leader pipeline into a fellowship program,institutionalizing the culture of peer mentorship that has been established.While student feedback following the first academic year in the intended residential, studioformat has been overwhelmingly positive, we continue to look for themes in course feedback topositively adjust the course moving forward. Course design is never truly done when relying onevidence-based practices. The future of ECE Discovery Studio is bright, paving the way tocrucial research as we learn more about discipline-specific
Paper ID #35741Finite Element Analysis and Design as a Degree Requirement inUndergraduate Mechanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Shield B Lin, Prairie View A&M University Shield Lin received his Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering from Texas A&M University in 1986. He has worked as an engineer in a tire manufacturer and served as a consultant for an automobile company and a projector manufacturer. As a professor in mechanical engineering at Prairie View A&M University, he teaches courses in Dynamic Systems and Controls, and Finite Element Analysis and Design. In addition to teaching, he conducts research in
factors and solutions to overcomebarriers. Thus, the following research question guided this portion of the research study: • What do engineering educators take into consideration when making teaching-related decisions?As part of our research, we have chosen to use a qualitative interview approach to understandengineering educators’ teaching-related decision making. We focus our first analysis on half ofthe dataset (10 interviews), in order to identify hypotheses and themes that can be tested againstthe rest of the dataset. This focused analysis of the collected interview data revealed thatengineering educators in our sample utilized a range of factors that may impact their teaching-related decisions making. For the purpose of this
at a job site. Further, these jobs take place during thesummer, and involves full-time, paid work with a variety of companies. Internships andcooperative opportunities (although the latter are not discussed in this paper) have long beenlauded as a meaningful practice for increasing student retention in computer science andengineering [14]. In fact, some research has found that a single internship experience cansometimes mean the difference between taking a job after graduation or choosing another field[15]. Generally, these experiences are representative of what a student might be doing in thefield as they learn the various tools, practices, and workflows of industry. Beyond hands-onpractice in the field, in a 2013 study, Samuelson and
established in 2001 as a traditional program of study,with most of the freshman directly graduated from high school. The program underwent ABETaccreditation during the 2006-2007 academic year for the first time, and the first cohort ofstudents graduated from the program in May 2006.Senior Design was initially a one-semester course with multiple teachers. Each teacher taught adistinct section. Each student selected his own teacher/section. Generally there were 3 or 4sections, each section having only 1 to 3 students. One problem with this initial structure wasthat the sections were very non-uniform. Another problem was that the class focused almostexclusively on building a working prototype, and neglected the overall process of design(especially soft
backgrounds and disciplines. 7 Leadership and management skills. 8 High ethical standards and a strong sense of professionalism. 9 Dynamic/agile/resilient/flexible. 10 Ability to learn and use the techniques and tools used in engineering practice. Ability to recognize the global, economic, environmental, and societal impact of 11 engineering design and analysis. Table 12: Mentor‐Self Assessment Skill Areas Proceedings of the 2011 PSW American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2011, American Society for Engineering Education
: From Molecules toOrganisms: Structures & Processes, ETS1: Engineering Design, and ETS2: Links AmongEngineering, Technology, Science & Society. The NGSS 8 practices of science and engineeringthat are essential for all students (Appendix F, 2013) were also included. Attention to theengineering design cycle was highlighted several times within the unit. The researchers were tasked to create a standards-based unit that successfully exposedstudents to engineering practices and attitudes with the hope that these students will enter theengineering field as adults. Preparing students to think and act like an engineer is an importantskill set that must be taught. Engineering in high school was noted to provide students with
Alliance members are still figuringout how research will inform the selection and/or design of the high impact practices and in turncontribute back into the collective knowledge. Participants’ comments range from lookingentirely to external sources to co-creating equity solutions.Ongoing CommunicationsOngoing Communications involves a range of approaches to strategically disseminate ideas andinformation and to educate stakeholders and decision makers to advance equity. The lack of timeto discuss problems and solutions during meetings is a major obstacle for the Alliance. Membersreflected that they are not able to have meaningful conversations about the issues they face anddevelop solutions that can help the Alliance move forward. This lack of
, June 13, 2010.13. McHenry, A., Depew, D., Dyrenfurth, M., Dunlap, D., Keating, D. Stamford, T., Lee, P. and Deloatch, G. (2005). “Constructivism: The learning theory that supports competency development of engineers for engineering practice and technology leadership through graduate education,” Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.14. Prince, M. and Felder, R. (2006). “Inductive teaching and learning methods: definitions, comparisons, and research bases,” Journal of Engineering Education,!95(2), 123-138, pp. 123-13815. Ohland, M., Pomeranz, H. and Feinstein, H. (2006). “The Comprehensive Assessment of Team Member Effectiveness: A New Peer Evaluation Instruments
Swarthmore College in 1980. She went on to earn an MS in Operations Research from Stanford University in 1981 and a Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University in 1984. After 30 years at Georgia Tech in a variety of roles, Donna became the Executive Director of the new Institute for STEM and Diversity Initiatives at Boise State University in January 2015. Donna’s current interests center around education issues in general, and in particular on increasing access and success of those traditionally under-represented and/or under-served in STEM higher education.Ms. Ann Delaney, Boise State University Ann Delaney graduated in 2016 with her Masters in Materials Science & Engineering with an interdisci- plinary
PhD in Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology from the Indian Institute of Technology. Arthur is a recipient of the EPA’s Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Award and has served as a faculty in the Chemical Engineering Summer School. Arthur is actively involved in engineering education research with particular emphasis on teaching engineering to non-engineers, and including industry practices in university education. Arthur is a member of American Society for Engineering Education.Dr. Igor Kourkine Page 24.103.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014A Sequence
Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University. Her research focuses what factors influence diverse students to choose engineering and stay in engineering through their careers and how different experiences within the practice and culture of engineering foster or hinder belongingness and identity development. Dr. Godwin graduated from Clemson University with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering and Ph.D. in Engineering and Science Education. Her research earned her a National Science Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning, to understand engineering students’ identity devel- opment. She is the recipient of a 2014
Yi-Ching Liao, University of Texas, San Antonio Yi-Ching Liao is a master’s student in advanced manufacturing and enterprise engineering at the Univer- sity of Texas, San Antonio (UTSA). She is also a Graduate Research Assistant at the Sustainable Manufac- turing System Laboratory at UTSA. She received her B.S. in system and naval mechatronic wngineering from National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) in Taiwan. Her research interests include lean systems design and implementation, simulation and gaming, and engineering education.Dr. Glenn Kuriger, University of Texas, San Antonio Glenn Kuriger is a Research Assistant Professor at the Center for Advanced Manufacturing and Lean Sys- tems (CAMLS) and the Department of