Asee peer logo
Displaying results 421 - 450 of 1574 in total
Conference Session
Mentorship, Retention, Minority Participation, and Examining the Experiences of Women
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Felix F. Udo-Eyo, Temple University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering Division(MIND)
. The NSSE indicators include the following: higher-order learning; reflective and integrativelearning; learning strategies; quantitative reasoning; collaborative learning; discussions withdiverse others; student-faculty interaction; effective teaching practices; quality interactions; andsupportive environments. The definition of these predictors is presented in Table 1. Other factorsthat will be included as variables in the study are the pre-college preparedness of the students, suchas the raw ACT and SAT scores of participants, and the socio-economic status of participants uponentering engineering college. The socio-economic status by proxy will be measured by theparticipant parents’ levels of education. Four success workshops will be
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 7
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kenya Z Mejia, University of Washington; Hailee Kenney, University of Washington; Tiffany Dewitt, University of Washington; Jennifer A Turns, University of Washington
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
University of Washington. Engineering education is her primary area of scholarship, and has been throughout her career. In her work, she currently focuses on the role of reflection in engineering student learning and the relationship of research and practice in engineering education. In recent years, she has been the co-director of the Consortium to Promote Reflection in Engineering Education (CPREE, funded by the Helmsley Charitable Trust), a member of the governing board for the International Research in Engineering Education Network, and an Associate Editor for the Journal of Engineering Education. Dr. Turns has published over 175 journal and conference papers on topics related to engineering education
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 4
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Stephanie Masta, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Janelle Grant, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign; Cara Margherio, University of Washington; Darryl Dickerson, Florida International University; Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Alice L. Pawley, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
qualitativecomments about each other at 4 points during the term. We tracked patterns of coded languageuse [27] amongst selected teams, and did a deep analysis of how coded language increased inintensity across the term. We also assessed how minoritized teammates indicated warnings oftheir marginalization. We have reported some analysis from these data elsewhere [27], [28], [31].Finally, we conducted a diary study during spring 2022, much delayed from our originaltimeline. We conducted in-person initial interviews with diary participants who were recruitedbased on their self-indicated identities as someone from a historically excluded group inengineering, using the device of a career journey map to structure the conversation. We thenasked them to reflect on
Conference Session
Gamification
Collection
ASEE Southeast Section Conference
Authors
Nahid Vesali, The Citadel; Mostafa Batouli, The Citadel
Tagged Topics
Professional Engineering Education Papers
theissues related to control and supervision in this game, and the supervisors of other teams hadfewer direct reports to start feeling overwhelmed by their supervisory role. Table 2: Students’ reflection vs. the intended learning objectives Percent implied correct answers in students’ reflection of the activity Expected Learning Objective CONE 415 PMGT 401 (n=20) (n=10) High Specialization + Fewer issues for specific Narrow Span of worker, therefore fewer 60
Conference Session
Graduate School
Collection
ASEE Southeast Section Conference
Authors
Jill K Nelson, George Mason University; Jessica Rosenberg; Mark Huntington Snyder, George Mason University
Tagged Topics
Professional Engineering Education Papers
designed to give GTAs a basic understanding of active learning, inclusiveclassroom practices and community building, strategies for student engagement, formative andsummative assessment, and rubric-based grading. GTAs were also introduced to academicresources on campus that may be helpful for students in their courses. The workshop format wasdesigned to be interactive with participants engaging in sample inquiry-based learning activitiesand reflecting on their own experiences with inclusive (or not) classrooms.The GTA training workshop described in this paper is part of a larger project that aims to makeactive learning the default method of instruction in highly enrolled gateway courses and todevelop a departmental (and university) culture that
Collection
14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference
Authors
Xinyu Zhang Ph.D, P.E., West Virginia University; Li Wang; Lynette Michaluk, West Virginia University; Robin A.M. Hensel, West Virginia University; Isabel Perez, West Virginia University; Clayton Scott Hammond, West Virginia University; Ian Bush; Ryan George Cao
Tagged Topics
Diversity
receivedcollege-related program information from high school counselors and checked emails regularly.Figure 1 shows top communication channels suggested by students; email and social mediaranked as the top choices. However, it contradicted the results of practice, since in 2021 and2022 AcES adopted both channels yet they did not yield the expected return. Upon reflection,AcES used Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram accounts of the Engineering College and theFundamentals of Engineering Program (FEP), and local Facebook groups that have limitedstudent connections. For example, FEP Facebook only has 206 followers, and most posts haveno likes or comments from prospective students. In addition, given all these social mediaplatforms are follower-based, key
Collection
14th Annual First-Year Engineering Experience (FYEE) Conference
Authors
Victoria Bill, New York University Tandon School of Engineering; Rui Li, New York University; Jack Bringardner, Colorado School of Mines; Ingrid Paredes, New York University Tandon School of Engineering
development or professional practice courses, these are typicallyoffered in the junior or senior year [5]. By the senior year, students are expected to have hadprofessional experience. There is a disconnect between the timing of these courses and industryexpectations. More recently, faculty at Vanderbilt University piloted an open elective careerdevelopment course which was promoted to rising sophomores, juniors, and seniors [6]. And,some first-year programs have begun to implement more career preparation through modules andbadging programs [7, 8].Similarly, portfolios as project documentation and career development tools have been adaptedacross engineering education [9-12]. Some first-year courses have implemented projectportfolios as a reflection
Conference Session
Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel Cartuche; victor R viteri; Miguel Andres Guerra, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ; Homero Murzi, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Architectural Engineering Division (ARCHE)
the other hand, theUnited States reflects its competition individually, creating a culture where everyone"strives to be the best they can be" and that "the winner takes all" [26].Uncertainty avoidance in Ecuador is relatively high which means that it uses differentmechanisms to avoid ambiguity, in this culture emotions are expressed openly andconservatism prevails even though the rules are not always respected, about itscollectivist characteristic this also reflects that the traditions of each group are alwayshighly respected [18]. The United States, on the other hand, is below average, whichmeans that its members accept new ideas and try new things; this can also be seen in thehigh level of innovation and creation of new products in the
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Anthony E. Felder, University of Illinois at Chicago; Michael Gordon Browne, University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Biomedical Engineering; Miiri Kotche, University of Illinois Chicago
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
summer of2022, we revised CIP to better validate the needs identified in CIP according to the IDEO modelfor innovation, which examines project desirability, feasibility, and viability [16, 17].Desirability reflects real-world user needs as assessed by primary observation, synthesis, andstakeholder analysis culminating in needs statements similar to our previous versions of CIP.Feasibility assesses the ability of a team to create a solution, including the availability oftechnology and the evaluation of prior art. Viability leverages market analysis and valueproposition to determine the potential of a solution to make a long-term market impact. Themost compelling needs, being validated by this model, were submitted to BME SD fordevelopment. The
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Madalyn Wilson-Fetrow, University of New Mexico; Vanessa Svihla, University of New Mexico; Sherry Hsi, BSCS Science Learning
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No.1751369 and Grant No. 2005784. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of theNational Science Foundation.References[1] V. Svihla, T. B. Peele-Eady, and A. Gallup, "Exploring agency in capstone design problem framing," Studies in Engineering Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 96–119, 2021, doi: 10.21061/see.69.[2] V. Svihla and T. B. Peele-Eady, "Framing agency as a lens into constructionist learning," Proceedings of Constructionism, pp. 313-324, 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.constructionismconf.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/C2020
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hillary E. Merzdorf, Texas A&M University; Donna Jaison, Texas A&M University; Samantha Ray, Texas A&M University; Anna Stepanova, Texas A&M University; Vimal Kumar Viswanathan, San Jose State University; Vinayak Krishnamurthy; Wayne Li, Georgia Institute of Technology; Julie S Linsey, Georgia Institute of Technology; Tracy Anne Hammond, Texas A&M University; Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
, 29 MS theses, and 10 Ph.D. dissertations. Hammond is the 2020 recipient of the TEES Faculty Fellows Award and the 2011 recipient of the Charles H. Barclay, Jr. ’45 Faculty Fellow Award. Hammond has been featured on the Discovery Channel and other news sources. Hammond is dedicated to diversity and equity, which is reflected in her publications, research, teaching, service, and mentoring. More at http://srl.tamu.edu and http://ieei.tamu.edu.Dr. Kerrie A Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Douglas is an Associate Professor in the Purdue School of Engineering Education. Her research is focused on improving methods of assessment in engineering learning environments and supporting engineering students
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ellen Zerbe, Georgia Institute of Technology; Adjo A Amekudzi-Kennedy, Georgia Institute of Technology; Kevin Haas, Georgia Institute of Technology; Donald R. Webster, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
maturity asthe students move through the courses. To create lasting change, the organizational structures must also be supportive. Twoinitiatives took place at this level. First, a School-wide climate study was conducted to assess senseof belonging, engagement, and perception of support in the undergraduate students, graduatestudents, and faculty and staff in the School. Second, modifications to the School’s strategic visionwere made to reflect a mission of EM and holistic education.Results Results presented in the poster represent a work in progress. These are the preliminaryresults and strategies we have used in this ongoing change process.RQ1: How can we develop effective learning environments for knowledge, skills, and
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Katie Evans, Houston Christian University; Marisa K. Orr, Clemson University; Mitzi Desselles, Louisiana Tech University
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
specifically designed for the program.ConclusionsHaving concluded the execution of the summer program, the team has started to reflect on NSFproject outcomes. The stated goal of the program was for 80% of the S-STEM Scholars tograduate with a STEM degree within four years. The 4-year graduation rates in STEM forCohorts 1 through 3 were 83%, 53%, and 84%, respectively. Program goals were met in two ofthe three years for which data is available. As mentioned above, the extent to which COVID-19had an impact on retention and graduation is unknown.Program sustainability is a significant challenge given that the scholarship funding covered fullcost of attendance for students, i.e. tuition, fees, books, housing, and meals. Sustaining theprogram will require
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lesley M. Berhan, The University of Toledo; Bryan Thomas Bosch
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
requirements and are admitted to anExploratory Studies major in the university’s University College. Historical data indicates thatapproximately 170 students per year with a high school GPA of 3.00 or higher are admitted toExploratory Studies because they do not meet the College of Engineering admissions criteria. Ofthose, roughly 78 students remain at the University after one year. Of those 78, only about 45students per year transition to College of Engineering majors by the end of their first year, withthe majority of these students transferring to engineering technology majors. The low transferrate for students to the College of Engineering in general and to engineering majors in particulardoes not accurately reflect the ability of these students
Conference Session
Using Computation and Modeling, Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ruben D. Lopez-Parra, University of New Mexico; Ravishankar Chatta Subramaniam; Jason Morphew, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics and Physics Division (EP2D)
find efficient solutionsto the problem. When this logical sequence of steps or instructions are developed to form aneffective procedure, this process can be automated to solve similar problems. Debugging refersto identifying and fixing errors in the algorithm, both during the development of the algorithmand when students attempt to transfer the algorithm to a new context. Iteration is the process ofrevisiting effective algorithms to improve their efficiency until an optimum state is reached.Generalization occurs when the algorithms and CT skills are transferred to effectively addressproblems in other domains. Because iteration and generalization require the problem context toallow sufficient time for reflection and modification of the solution
Conference Session
Computers in Education Division (COED) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Valerie A. Carr, San Jose State University; Jennifer Avena, San Jose State University; David Schuster, San Jose State University; Wendy Lee, San Jose State University; Belle Wei, San Jose State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computers in Education Division (COED)
learningcommunity (FLC) with a local two-year institution to foster a collaborative community andsupport faculty in adopting APEX materials, which included helping them to consider, plan,apply, and reflect on effective practices for integrating computing into their courses. Buildingupon these pilot efforts, we are actively expanding adoption of the APEX program in severalways. First, we have begun holding summer and winter training workshops for faculty at severaladditional community colleges. Second, we are refining and improving the FLC experience aswe initiate new FLCs with these institutional partners. Finally, we will continue to assess theprogram’s efficacy through a research plan that evaluates student and faculty experiences,allowing us to optimize
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Catherine Mcgough Spence, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Emilie A. Siverling, Minnesota State University, Mankato; Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech
Tagged Topics
Diversity, NSF Grantees Poster Session
State University, Mankato. She has a Ph.D. in Engineering Education, an M.S.Ed. in Curriculum and Instruction - Science Education, and a B.S. in Materials Science and Engineering.Dr. Michelle Soledad, Virginia Tech Michelle Soledad, Ph.D. is a Collegiate Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. Her research and service interests include teaching and learning experiences in fun- damental engineering courses, faculty development and support initiatives – including programs for the future engineering professoriate, and leveraging institutional data to support reflective teaching practices. She has degrees in Electrical Engineering (B.S., M.Eng.) from the Ateneo de Davao University
Conference Session
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED) Technical Session 5: Work-in-Progress Part 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Gaurav Giri, University of Virginia
Tagged Divisions
Chemical Engineering Division (ChED)
techniques. A few reasons could explain the results. One, as the students spend a disproportionateamount of time using analytical solutions, they are more likely to recall instances where theirknowledge was limited. Conversely, good programming technique is not utilized heavily in thecore curriculum, so they do not have the chance to continuously struggle with new material, andthus have an inflated sense of knowledge concerning the material. Another reason could be that,it is possible that the coding-heavy nature of the course enabled the students to remember goodprogramming practices, and this is reflected in the subsequent semesters. The lowest self-rating was given to the question “I can code my own numerical solutionsto PDEs
Conference Session
Redefining Manufacturing Education Practices
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ismail Fidan, Tennessee Technological University
Tagged Divisions
Manufacturing Division (MFG)
aims to encourage continuousimprovement in engineering and technology education and ensure that graduates have thenecessary knowledge and skills to meet industry and society's evolving needs.ABET accreditation holds significant value for students, faculty, and programs, as it proves thatthe program has met rigorous standards and is dedicated to providing quality education.Accreditation by ABET also offers recognition and professional development opportunities forgraduates.2.4. Service LearningService learning is an educational method that blends community service with academicinstruction, reflection on the service experience, and connecting it to personal and social growth.Its aim is to offer students practical opportunities to use their
Conference Session
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Evelyn Hanna, Kent Place School; Suzanne Tracy, Kent Place School
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
;E Department.The school’s mission centers around empowering girls to be confident, intellectual, and ethicalleaders who advance the world. With the school’s mission in mind, the CS&E Departmentdefined a curricular scope and sequence aimed at introducing the various disciplines ofengineering, focusing on engineering as a “helping profession” and cultivating students’engineering habits of mind and identity. The focus of this paper is to zoom in on a 2nd gradelesson that reflects the goals of the CS&E curricular scope and sequence.At the Primary School level, which includes grades K-5, the pre-transformed curriculumenhanced students’ knowledge of and skills with block-based coding and robotics. Building onthis strength, and after a
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Technical Session 5: Preparing the Future Workforce
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John T. Solomon, Tuskegee University; Sadegh Poozesh, Tuskegee University; Hang Song, Auburn University; Karen S. McNeal, Auburn University ; Lauren E. Beckingham, Auburn University; Kelly Lazar, Clemson University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
. In Survey S4.2, students were asked how much they would like to sacrifice for a job position inthe renewable energy industry compared to a traditional company. Sacrifices on salary difference,driving distance, and driving time were given as response options with varying acceptance levels.The sacrifice levels are mapped to a 0-6 scale so that a maximum average score might reflect theirintention to sacrifice more for a renewable job option. The average score for this response is 3.67,indicating that they are willing to sacrifice their salary/driving distance/time to a reasonable extentfor a job in the renewable industry. Fig. 4 Survey response a) S5.1 on sacrifice for a job position in renewable energy whencompared with a traditional company
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 13
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Amy Slaton, Drexel University; Kayla R. Maxey, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Monica McGill, CSEdResearch.org; Jordan Williamson
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
Abstract In order to inform a discussion of silenced communities within systemic processes, we examine the ASEE Diversity Recognition Program (ADRP) as a step towards amplifying re- flexive and critical activities already occurring within ASEE. In light of recent concern over the ADRP as a means of disrupting minority marginalization in Engineering Education1 , we reflect on the origins of the program as well as how to proactively shift the program’s cultural context to one of greater criticality about Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) in engineering, broadly. To investigate this more deeply, our research questions for this study were: What have other organizations used to anoint2 member
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT) Technical Session 3: Projects and Student Learning
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Reap, Quinnipiac University; David Tomczyk, Quinnipiac University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division (ENT)
studies or of augmenting quantitativemethods with qualitative ones in the future. Examination of individual questions in the surveyinstrument hint at improvements in the ability to view problems holistically, consider others’thinking and manage anxiety. Changes in specific GSE and nAch questions may reflect arealization of the challenges presented by the entrepreneurship clients’ more realistic designproblems and by understanding the thinking of others. Factors such as age, presence of a closefamily member with engineering experience, and prior work in engineering significantly affectone or more regressions of nAch, GSE, and ToA values. Lower Initial (p = 0.026) and FinalnAch (p = 0.032) appear for students with prior work in engineering. Those
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - WIPS 2: Advising & Mentoring
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Kelyn Rola, Southern Methodist University; Caitlin Anderson, Southern Methodist University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
transfer status, both out of the school ofengineering and out of SW-PWI. The rosters also included students’ term grade point average(GPA) and term hours completed for Fall 2022, which were used as measures of academicoutcomes. Term hours completed refer to the credit hours that students passed and completed ina semester, and do not reflect students’ initial credit hour enrollment. We selected both GPA andterm hours completed as measurement metrics because SW-PWI uses these variables to measurestudent persistence and to predict students’ retention and graduation.Second, we requested and received access to a retention dashboard at SW-PWI. This dashboardcontains historical retention data both within the school of engineering and at the institution
Conference Session
Equity, Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY) Technical Session 2
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Shauna N. Adams, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Kerrie A. Douglas, Purdue University, West Lafayette ; Philip Goldberg, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Culture & Social Justice in Education Division (EQUITY), Equity
questions measure the constructs as intended by the authors. However, themajority of validation studies in engineering education do not look at how items function forsubgroups of learners, particularly different racial, ethnic, and cultural groups [1]. Evenframeworks designed to improve the validity evidence provided regarding an assessment’s score,still leave out evaluations of fairness [2]–[4]. To gain a better understanding of how wellengineering assessment contexts are reflective of the diverse experiences of engineering studentsin the U.S., this work-in-progress paper explores the contexts of concept inventories from asociocultural perspective. The purpose of this WIP paper is to identify contexts that are used in three
Conference Session
Teaching Mechanics: Modes and Methods
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Robert A. Hume, P.E., United States Military Academy; Adrian Biggerstaff, United States Military Academy; Eric B. Williamson, U.S. Military Academy
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Mechanics Division (MECHS)
be better. I felt like I was just correcting mathematical errors, perhaps this method will improve my scrutiny over time but it is hard to tell from one problem set.Students were similarly neutral to positive in their comments at the end of the semester, thoughfar fewer focused on the mechanics of working through the self-revision process. Most studentsfocused their comments instead on the outcomes of the process: The self-revised method reduced study time and helped me work through my thought process on mistakes, helping me to solidify how to overcome those particular problems. I was better able to reflect on my mistakes using this method. This is because, for the regular problem sets, I rarely look at
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 3: Evaluation & Assessment
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Clodagh Reid, Technological University of the Shannon: Midlands Midwest; Sheryl A. Sorby, University of Cincinnati; Gibin Raju, University of Cincinnati; Jeffrey Buckley, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH); Niall Seery, Technological University of the Shannon
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
before submission oftheir “final” product [7]. This would be to the benefit of both faculty and students as it wouldreduce the burden on faculty to provide feedback to all students in a large group while alsoincreasing the feedback and timeliness of the feedback that students receive. Arguably for anassessment mechanism the most important factors considered are the reliability and validityof the assessment tool. The validity of ACJ refers to the validity of the rank-order that isproduced and is directly tied to the cohort of judges which is assembled [18]. The reliabilityof ACJ sessions is described by the Scale Separation Reliability (SSR) coefficient which, inthe context of comparative judgement, has strong indications that it reflects an
Conference Session
First-Year Programs Division (FYP) - Technical Session 11: Projects
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Fethiye Ozis, Carnegie Mellon University; Kelly Salyards P.E., Bucknell University; David A. Saftner, University of Minnesota Duluth; Tanya Kunberger, Florida Gulf Coast University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
First-Year Programs Division (FYP)
notstraightforward.In this study, the authors surveyed faculty teaching introductory courses in engineering toexplore the range of projects already developed, the basic details of the projects, and topicsaddressed in each. The online survey was utilized to collect faculty members’ teachingapproaches, preparation, activities, and materials needed, as well as self-reflection. Data analysiscategorized first-year engineering projects (N=32) by the project outcomes, themes, extentwithin the course coverage, grading system, institutions’ educational model, and the projects’inclusivity of other power/holistic skills. There were common features among the first-yearintroductory engineering courses including the engineering design process, teamwork, andprofessional
Conference Session
Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT) Technical Session 4
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Computing and Information Technology Division (CIT)
simulation is running in Tinkercad Circuits. However, the output in the serialmonitor will reflect whichever Arduino was selected at the beginning of the simulation start. Forexample, while interacting with the potentiometer, only the analog circuit (lower one in Fig. 2)will display output in the serial monitor. In contrast, if the student clicks on the upper arduinobefore clicking the StartSimulation button, s/he will notice the serial monitor starts displaying0 (the default digital output when push button is not pressed) on the serial monitor. As soon ass/he presses the push button, the serial monitor will print 1 and then go back to the default 0state.Graph Output: Tinkercad allows to visualize the circuit output data in graph format. Though
Conference Session
Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON) Technical Session 3
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Matthew Baideme P.E., United States Military Academy; Kathryn Blair Newhart; Cristian Robbins; Michael A. Butkus P.E., United States Military Academy; Andrew Ross Pfluger P.E., United States Military Academy
Tagged Divisions
Environmental Engineering Division (ENVIRON)
methodologies were examined within a large enrollmentcourse, it was concluded that students who selected their own teams earned grades that mirroredtheir overall course grade. Lower performing students who were randomly assigned, orpurposefully grouped with higher performing students based on previous performance, typicallyearned higher grades on the group assignment than other events in the course. However, theincreased grade in these cases did not consistently reflect improved individual performance.Keywords: team grading; team-based learning; team selection; group projects; assessment1. IntroductionGroup work, commonly referred to as cooperative learning [1], is an essential aspect of anundergraduate engineering experience because it is required to